Joy Behar is on the 'spectrum of mental'

On "The View" Monday, co-host Joy[less] Behar went off the grid and onto the "spectrum of mental." She cussed out co-host Meghan McCain and was threatening to do what she has done in the past: walk off the stage if she didn't like what she heard.

The topic was about the death of President George H.W. Bush who died on Friday at the age of 94. Instead of honoring the late president, Behar found another excuse to attack President Trump and the topic she attacked him on was totally irrelevant to the discussion. It was when McCain, who had recently lost her own father, a war hero like Bush, to cancer, interrupted the crazed Behar asking her to stop talking about President Trump and focus on President Bush.

The exchange devolved into an on-air shouting match.

Behar apparently lost control, cussed out McCain, and referred to her as an "entitled b**ch." Behar then threatened to quit the show if McCain was not put "under control."

Behar's words were: 

"This president that we have now is trying to unravel everything that [Bush] did and Obama did. And if I ever become a one-issue voter, it will be about pollution and the greenhouse effect."

McCain immediately jumped in: "Can we focus on [Bush], please? I don’t want to talk about Trump," she interrupted. "We're honoring a great president who passed."

"Excuse me," Behar attempted to defend herself. "Excuse me a second, please, I want to talk about the differences!"

"I'm not interested in your one-issue voter --" McCain began.

"I don’t care what you’re interested in, I’m talking!" interrupted Behar.

Meeting Behar's tone, McCain shot back, "I don't care what you’re interested in, either!"

Co-host Whoopi Goldberg quickly ended the segment and threw to commercial break as Behar and McCain are seen still shouting at one another at the round table.

According to sources at The Daily Mail,  that's when the incident really devolved. Producers hurried to turn off Behar's mic and tried to calm her down as she cussed out McCain and threatened to quit. The audience also heard and saw the lunacy:

Behar threw her hands in the air, yelled "My God!" and "Get this b**ch under control."

"If this s**t doesn't stop I'm quitting this damn show. I can't take this much more," Behar allegedly yelled.

Producers ran to the stage in an attempt to deescalate the situation, but Behar continued to rant, the source said.

"I've tolerated a lot of s**t on this show but I'm at my wits' end with this entitled b***h. Enough already! Enough already! I'm not playing nice any longer," Behar shouted, apparently under the illusion that she has 'played nice' before.

"I don't know why she's so upset," McCain reportedly said calmly. "I just wanted her to focus on President Bush and not bring Trump into this for once."

"Everyone was frantic," a source reported. "The last thing they wanted was for Joy to walk off the show. She's done that before. Remember the Bill O'Reilly situation? She appeared just as disgusted as she did that day and they only had two minutes to contain this explosion on set and get everyone positioned to return for the next live segment. It was utter chaos on set."

Looks like someone needs a time out. . . . or a nice firing. She is living proof that leftism is a mental disorder and that you don't need to be smarter than Scully H.W. Bush to be on "The View."

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow or not. I hope you do. Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah.



Tweet

Bill O'Reilly gone from Fox News

(Photo: Fox News Channel)

Bill O'Reilly is no longer going to be the Fox News icon--he's done. He has been forced out as a prime-time host after it has been disclosed that multiple settlements involving sexual harassment allegations have been made against him.

O'Reilly's ouster ends his two-decades as the most popular and influential cable TV commentator.

"After a thorough and careful review of the allegations, the company and Bill O'Reilly have agreed that Bill O'Reilly will not be returning to the Fox News Channel," 21st Century Fox, the parent company of Fox News, said in a statement.

To the credit of Fox News Channel, they stood by O'Reilly even after the allegations of sexual harassment were piled on. He reached settlements with five women to the tune of around $13 million.

Apparently, after more than 50 advertisers abandoned O'Reilly's show, "The Factor," it was time for Fox to call it quits. 

The New York Times reported that inside the company, women were outraged and questioned whether Fox executives were "serious about maintaining a culture based on 'trust and respect,' as they had promised last summer when another sexual harassment scandal forced the ouster of Fox News' chairman, Roger Ailes."

(Photo: Fox News Channel)

O'Reilly, 67, didn't comment on his status since he left on vacation last week, but his attorney issued a statement Tuesday calling it a "smear campaign" by liberal opponents. It said that Mr. O'Reilly "has been subjected to a brutal campaign of character assassination that is unprecedented in post-McCarthyist America.

With the 8 p.m. spot empty, Fox will move Tucker Carlson in that time-slot and move "The Five" from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Beginning May 1st, Eric Bolling will debut a one-hour program at 5:00 p.m. Martha MacCallum's show, "First 100 Days" will remain permanent. Perhaps they will rename it "First 1461 Days" to cover President Trump's first term in office.

O'Reilly's departure follows that of Roger Ailes who, nine months ago, was forced out as chairman after a sexual harassment lawsuit by former host Gretchen Carlson and at least six other women, all of which he denied. One of those women is Megyn Kelly who also clashed with O'Reilly and has since left Fox for liberal NBC last December.

The message that Rupert Murdoch and his sons are sending is that there is now a change in the company's culture and harassment is unacceptable.

To follow Brain Flushings, please click the Follow button in the right margin


Tweet

More ads pulled from "The O'Reilly Factor"

Bill O'Reilly is under assault by five women who claim he sexually harassed them. He paid them off in $13 million settlements. To some, that makes him guilty even without a trial--to those who think that way, I suspect you'd change your tune if you were in the same boat. 

Now companies are pulling their commercials from his show, "The O'Reilly Factor" after the settlements were discovered.

According to a report by CNBC, a news outlet with as much credibility as Susan Rice, said that more than 30 companies have called to pull their ads. These companies are: Subaru, Jenny Craig, Mercedes-Benz, Bayer, BMW of North America, Hyundai, Mitsubishi Motors, Lexus, Orkin, Constant Contact, Allstate, Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Untuckit and Credit Karma, to name a bunch.

Thankfully, we'll still get to see "Hi, I'm William Devane."

Although O'Reilly didn't address the report on Monday night, he said in a statement over the weekend that the settlements were made "to put to rest any controversies to spare my children." 

O'Reilly has two teenagers.

"Just like other prominent and controversial people, I'm vulnerable to lawsuits from individuals who want me to pay them to avoid negative publicity," he wrote. "In my more than 20 years at Fox News Channel, no one has ever filed a complaint about me with the Human Rights Resources Department, even on the anonymous hotline."

President Trump, who probably should spend less time dealing with these matters, said in a New York Times interview that O'Reilly is "a good person" who "shouldn't have settled" in the lawsuits made against him.

Fox News Channel said in a statement that ads were going to be shifted to other programming.

Remember, even Bill O'Reilly has said that a man is presumed innocent until proven guilty. 

Do not judge as you would not be judged.

Leave that to other twits on Twitter.


Tweet

Dem mayors want dem illegal immigrants

Liberal mayors in seven major cities have reaffirmed their commitments to break the law by sheltering illegal aliens from federal law enforcement after President-elect Trump said he'd block federal funding for these so-called "sanctuary cities."

While liberals pretend to be the moral party, they are not--they are protecting unvetted foreigners from being held accountable for their actions and leaving innocent Americans vulnerable to some of the miscreants who come here.

Although sanctuary cities vary in their policies, what generally happens is that local police refrain from working along with federal authorities who would identify and deport those who have broken local laws, except in cases where serious crimes have been committed.

Democratic mayors in cities such as: New York, Chicago, Seattle, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Providence, R.I. said they would challenge Trump (and evidently the U.S. Constitution) on his attempt to crack down on illegal immigration.

San Francisco would lose a billion dollars annually from the federal government, and the way Democrats run things, it would screw things up even more. The plan these mayors may have is to blame Trump for their dire straits and the gullible liberals will believe that.

The Trump administration would have greater ability to slow down or even suspend the allocation of discretionary grants, especially those related to criminal justice and dispensed by the Justice Department or the Department of Homeland Security, according to Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University.

Turley believes that "there's a great deal the Trump administration could do to carry out the threat." He said that Trump's administration could steer more grant money to cities that cooperate with federal immigration laws, but added that cities could take the administration to court to fight it.

Some city officials argue, "It's not my job, man," regarding how immigration laws sows distrust between illegal immigrant communities and the police.

L.A. doesn't turn over illegal immigrants arrested for low-level (illegal) behavior known as crimes to ICE. You practically have to kill someone before they think about deporting you. Philadelphia allows illegal aliens to commit non-violent crimes (by their definition) before turning them in to ICE. 

What's clear is that Democratic mayors and other authorities believe that their definition of what is moral trumps (no pun intended) the law. That's why nothing was done about "Kate's Law" proposed by Bill O'Reilly of Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor." 

Kate's law would demand:

 1. a 10-year maximum prison term for an alien who reenters the U.S. after being denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed on 3 or more prior occasions; and

2. a 5-year mandatory minimum prison term for an alien who reenters after being removed following a conviction for an aggravated felony or following 2 or more prior convictions for illegal entry.

The law was voted down by the Democrat majority Senate when it failed to reach a supermajority needed to defeat a filibuster (60 votes).

The law should be considered a "no brainer" but the liberal brainless refused to pass it.


Tweet

What does Trump really believe?

Donald Trump changes his opinions more often than a chameleon changes its cable carrier. When asked about his opinion on bringing in skilled foreign labor for example, his opinion seems to depend upon which TV network the interview is being conducted.

He admits he changed his mind on this issue when questioned at the debate, but you have to wonder if he would have revealed his change of mind if he wasn't asked what his new opinion happens to be.

By the way, politicians call it evolving when they do it, and flip-flopping when others do it.

The Donald even changes the changes of his mind that he has made when he makes additional changes.

 Let's look at some of these multiple changes.

On Obamacare: 

In his June 16, 2015 campaign announcement, he wanted to get rid of Obamacare and "replace it with something much better."
July 29, 2015. On CNN Trump tells Bash, "I want to take care of everybody. You know, you have a group of people that aren't able to take care of themselves." 
Bash: "How are you going to do that?"
Trump: "We're going to have to work out some kind of deal with hospitals where they can get some help, when they are sick, when they have no money and they are sick . . . "
Bash: "How do you do that though?"
Trump: "We're going to have to work out some kind of very, very smart deal with hospitals around the country."

In February 2016,  Trump said he liked the mandate, now he wants to abolish it.

On ISIS: 

Last June 16, at his presidential campaign kickoff speech: "Within our military I will find the General Patton or I will find General MacArthur. I will find the right guy. I will find a guy that's going t take that military and make it really work."

Same interview on O'Reilly Bill asked, "Are you telling me you are going to send American ground troops into Syria?" 
Trump's response was, "Im not telling you anything." 
His secret was kept safe for several minutes until, "I will tell you what my plan will be--you have to go in. You have to go in." 
O'Reilly then asked, "With ground troops?"
Trump: "Well, you  bomb the hell out of them and then you encircle it, and then you go in."
And the interview went back and forth as Trump's opinions changed faster than a speeding bullet.

On immigration: 

July 23, 2015. "The first thing we have to do is strengthen our borders. And after that, were' going to have plenty of time to talk about it."

July 24, 2015. "Work something out so the good ones can stay. If somebody's been outstanding, we try and work something out."

July 26, 2015. "We're going to do what's right; some are going to have to go. And some, we're just going to see what happens."

July 27, 2015. "But the good ones--of which there are many--I want to expedite it so they can come back in legally."

July 29, 2015. On a CNN interview with Dana Bash, she asks, "What about the 'Dreamers'? What about people who came here when they were children, they didn't know what they were doing, they came with their parents who brought them here illegally? Should they have to leave too?"
Trump responded: "They're with their parents? It depends."

On Meet the Press, Sunday, Chuck Todd discussing the 'Dreamers' asked, "You're going to kick them out?"
Trump: "They have to go."

In the March GOP debate, Trump said he would have the military commit war crimes. Specifically, the crimes in question have to do with killing the families of terrorists, and use interrogation techniques like waterboarding and worse.
Trump: "They're not going to refuse me. If I say do it, they're going to do it."

He has since changed his opinion on this.

What I believe we're seeing is a candidate who knows what to say to the audience in front of him but knows little about the Constitution and the law. If Trump is evolving, then he's too much of a neophyte to be running the nation.

If he has a hidden agenda beyond serving his ego needs, than is he any better than a Barack Obama?

Still, if Trump won the GOP nomination, I would vote for him in a heartbeat. When George Burns, in his 90s was asked how it felt to be old, he said something like, "I prefer this to the alternative."

George also said, "When I was young, the Dead Sea was only sick."

I am thinking of the alternative.



Tweet

O'Reilly Obama Omaha Omahahaha

"It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit"--Noel Coward

Yesterday's interview by Bill O'Reilly of President Obama showed more defense than the Denver Broncos had at the game. In the ten minute interview that aired  before the Superbowl, O'Reilly asked a series of pointed questions, which, I believe, were quite relevant, but the answers Obama gave were nothing more than the typical filibuster you expect to hear from him. They did not answer even one of the questions posed, and what came out of the "confrontation" was an attack on Fox News and O'Reilly. This was a perfect example of Saul Alinsky's Rule number 5 (in his "Rules for Radicals") which states: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." Unfortunately, O'Reilly had no choice but to be respectful to the Socialist in Chief, and his comebacks were more powder-puff than hardball (excuse the expression--it was not intended to give Chris Matthews any credit). If you would like to see the interview on the Fox News Network along with Howard Kurtz's thoughts go here 

Why Fox News Lose Views

Seriously, it's getting frustrating and downright annoying to watch Fox News lately. I understand the fair and balanced part, but I'm not a fan of liberals cutting off the conversation whenever a conservative begins to speak. I know conservatives do the same thing, only less frequently, and since I'm a conservative, I find it less irritating when the conservative is guilty. I don't watch Fox to see some libtard shut down the truth with their "Obama is a perfect human being and conservatives are wrong about everything." 

Stealing Our Privacy With a Smile and a Lie

Obama spoke at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose, CA today. The topic was the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, aka the Not Really Affordable Care Act, and after the smoke and mirrors, he took a prearranged question from a reporter, if you can call them reporters anymore. The question was obviously about the most recent scandal to hit the public's attention: the records subpoenaing of all Verizon customers in the United States of America--and that's just what we're aware of at this time.