Charlize Theron lets her 7-year-old make life decisions

Charlize Theron is an open comic book about her family life. She thinks her 7-year-old son is a girl because he thinks he's a girl in spite of the fact that his penis and chromosomes tell a different story. When he was three years old, he told his mother that he was a girl and she believes him because she evidently failed or never took biology in school.

“Yes, I thought she was a boy, too,” the 43-year-old idiot admitted to The Daily Mail. “Until she looked at me when she was three years old and said, ‘I am not a boy!'” Rather than correcting him she must have thought hey, I don't want any trouble.

“So there you go! I have two beautiful daughters who, just like any parent, I want to protect and I want to see thrive,” the woke "Atomic Blonde" actress said. “They were born who they are and exactly where in the world both of them get to find themselves as they grow up, and who they want to be, is not for me to decide.”

Theron adopted Jackson in 2012 and her second daughter, August, in 2015. She is allowing them to make all their important life decisions, being totally unaware that most kids with gender confusion at that age, eventually see themselves as their biological gender.

“My job as a parent is to celebrate them and to love them and to make sure that they have everything they need in order to be what they want to be,” she added, “and I will do everything in my power for my kids to have that right and to be protected within that.”

Her job as a parent is also to guide her child in their behavior and decisions. A three-year-old's brain is not sufficiently developed to make decisions like deciding their gender.

Transgender boy who thinks he's
a girl

She credits her mother for teaching her how to be a tolerant and accepting person. So it's clear that if her mother meant that she should be tolerant of the misconceptions of their children, she too sucked at motherhood and it shows in Charlize Theron's thinking.

What if her son thought he was a puppy?

“You know, I grew up in [South Africa] where people lived with half-truths and lies and whispers and nobody said anything outright, and I was raised very specifically not to be like that,” Theron said in a serious voice. “I was taught by my mom that you have to speak up; you have to be able to know that, when this life is over, you’ll have lived the truth you’re comfortable with, and that nothing negative can come from that.”

Theron has been an LGBTQ activist for many years. In 2009, she announced on "The View" that she wouldn't get married to her then-boyfriend Stuart Townsend until everyone in the United States had a right to marry, demonstrating just how unsure she was of Townsend.

"I have so many friends who are gays and lesbians who would so badly want to get married, that I wouldn’t be able to sleep with myself,” she said seriously once more.

How can you not sleep with yourself?

Theron is abusing the privacy of her family situation to show us all just how woke she is. Are you convinced her son is a daughter?


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Kyrsten Sinema rejects family values; claims stay-at-home moms 'leech off their husbands'

Arizona socialist and Democratic senatorial candidate Kyrsten Sinema once agreed that it was just fine for Americans to join the Taliban. She accused of President George W. Bush of "Crowning himself King of the World for Life," and of putting arsenic in the nation's drinking water, and referred to Arizona citizens as "racists."

Now she has made it clear of her contempt for stay-at-home mothers.

In a 2006 interview with Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944, the socialist went berserk when describing women who stay at home to care for their children and run a household. "These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bullsh*t. I mean, what the f**k are we really talking about here?"

Well, for one thing, we're talking about what was once traditional in a standard household--the mother stayed home, took care of raising the kids to a degree, cooked and cleaned while the father was out earning a living.

Good fathers would help their wives with doing things around the house, but there were gender roles and nobody had a problem with that until the second wave of feminists came around to tell women how to think.

Sinema was once married to a BYU classmate but later divorced him. [Lucky guy.] Fortunately, she has no children and is a strong advocate for killing babies in the womb if they pose an inconvenience. She co-sponsored the Women's Health Protection Act, which has almost nothing to do with women's health, but almost everything to do with allowing mothers to kill their baby while it was still growing in the womb.

Carol Tobias, president of the National Right to Life Committee told the Senate Judiciary Committee:

We find the formal title or marketing label, "Women's Health Protection Act," to be highly misleading. The bill is really about just one thing: stripping away from elected lawmakers the ability to provide even the most minimal protections for unborn children, at any stage of their development. The proposal is so sweeping and extreme that it would be difficult to capture its full scope in any short title. Calling it the "Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act" would be more in line with truth-in-advertising standards.

The bill would subject any law or government policy that affects the practice of abortion, even indirectly, to an array of sweeping legal tests, designed to guarantee that almost none will survive. The general rule would be that any law that specifically regulated abortion would be presumptively invalid. The same would be true of any law that is not abortion-specific but has the effect or claimed effect of reducing access to abortion. It is apparent that those who crafted this bill believe that, where abortion is involved, immediate access to abortion, or any stage of pregnancy, is the only thing that matters.

In her 2009 obscure book, "Unite and Conquer: How to Build Coalitions That Win--And Last,"  Sinema wrote: "I don't mean that we should all of a sudden abandon our principles and adopt moral relativism. I just mean that we should consider the idea that perhaps people with views different from our own come about those ideas honestly and that those ideas aren't inherently evil."

As long as those ideas are the same as hers and aren't about mothers raising their children in the centuries old way.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet