![]() |
AOC learns to spell zephyr |
On Saturday, Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex and her advisers began running a full-scale operation to distract and deflect from criticism of the "Green New Deal," initially lying that conservatives had circulated a handful of "doctored" versions of her FAQ, and then, when that line of attack failed once their lie was exposed, the lie being that the posted FAQ, which suggested, among other things, a universal income even for those "unwilling" to work, was an irrelevant "early draft."
That, of course, was a disgusting lie, the signature kind of lies of the Democratic Party and their media.
But instead of laying the blame where it belonged — squarely at the feet of Obviosa-Communista and her morally challenged advisers, who clearly botched their own Green New Deal rollout — the media immediately blamed conservatives for "pouncing" on the Communist's plan, because they cannot keep themselves from defending to the death a leftist idea.
Leftist digital toilet tissue, Business Insider, provided the most egregious example, accusing conservatives of unfairly "attacking" AOC for "accidentally" leaking a document posted to her website and delivered directly to several members of the news media.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b67/a7b67f4f733fe3d4731405452b16ed33b7a7a19e" alt=""
Josh Jordan
✔@NumbersMuncher
Business Insider was ultimately forced to rewrite the headline, which nobody read, and issue a new tweet, which nobody read, after real reporters pointed out that the leak appeared to be far from "accidental."
AOC's team posted the FAQ to the congresswoman's official website, and members of her press team sent a pitch containing the FAQ to a number of high-profile media outlets, including National Public Radio, which posted the document in full on its website as soon as the congresswoman's embargo on the material lifted.
Even The Washington Post, which could not deny that the FAQ appeared in multiple outlets on Thursday and Friday, tried to sow skepticism about the document's validity, calling the sheet a "mystery."
And they wonder why nobody trusts them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcf7a/bcf7a0d3c8f15d5bd76e30b562e8871de0acbd45" alt=""
Jeff Stein
✔@JStein_WaPo
The only "mystery" was how the congresswoman was ever elected to office--oh, yeah, she's from New York City. There was no "mystery" because it came directly from AOC's office. But the mainstream media appears not simply unwilling to admit the cutie pie's mistake — or, even, perhaps, the full intent of the "Green New Deal" itself — but that Americans might have been shocked at the official piece of legislation, and not merely a conservative rewrite.
Unable to take the hit, ultimately, Obviosa-Communista and her advisers took partial blame for the document, claiming it was merely a "draft" FAQ that was posted and sent to reporters by mistake. They have promised a more accurate rundown of the Green New Deal legislation.
So the idiot puts drafts on her website? Now that's just as stupid as the "draft" itself.
It's a good thing for the left that they own most of the mainstream media or they would never get elected--even the dog-catcher would be wearing a MAGA hat.
I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment