Trump winning NY Jewish vote

Past polling claimed that "70% of Jews" voted for Obama and Biden, but this comes from leftist or liberal groups that wouldn't vote for a Republican under any circumstances, including one in which the Democrat opponent was barely sentient.

Except for Siena College, no other independent polling of New York Jews was done.

As it now stands in the latest Siena College poll, former President Donald Trump is beating Kamala Harris in New York by 50-49.

Forty-three percent of Jews have an unfavorable opinion of Harris and 42% unfavorable view of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D).

Jews who are prepared to vote for Republicans in their congressional district are at 42%.

These numbers are actually independent polling data as opposed to the "70% of Jews" who voted for Biden as seen in fairy tales written by Democrat pollsters.

Kamala is underwater among Jews in New York and it's only going to get worse as she continues kissing the butts of Hamas supporters and selling out the Jews.

Tweet

New poll shows Biden's blunder attacking Americans in his speech

It was probably not a great idea for Biden to use September 1st for his speech as it was the 83rd anniversary of Adolf Hitler's invasion of Poland. But as a guy who graduated in the lower half of his class, with a 1.9 Grade Point Average [where 3.0 is average] old Joe probably isn't much of a history buff as much as he's a buffoon. Yes, he graduated 506 out of 688 in his class, not she sharpest knife on the tree.

Trafalgar Group, in partnership with the Convention of States, has a new poll out,  showing just how boneheaded Biden and his handlers were with the latest tactic in which he demonized 75 million MAGA Americans, calling them a "clear and present danger" to the country.

For over a week, the so-called President went hard against conservatives and ended it off with his Hitlerian primetime speech last Thursday. However, when he heard how the nation reacted to his speech, he backpedaled the next day denying that he meant all Republicans. His speech was so grotesque that even the Compromised News Network (CNN) called out his use of Marines standing ominously in the background. 

Incompetent White House lesbian-of-color Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked if Biden was planning to apologize for what he said--she had no answer.

Now the numbers are in, and they show what a stupid move this tactic was. Biden obviously did this to try and whip up his base–hoping that they would get out and “vote, vote, vote”–as he implored them to do during the gaslighting speech they claimed was “non-political.” [When a liberal tells you one thing, believe the opposite to be true.]

Likely voters were polled over what they thought about an American president accusing his political opponents of “an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”

The majority of likely voters (56.8%) believes the speech  “represents a dangerous escalation in rhetoric and is designed to incite conflict amongst Americans.” While that sounds like a healthy number, it's hard to believe that more people failed to see it that way as 35.5% said the speech was an "acceptable" campaign message in an election year. Hey, I thought the speech was not political. 

Of that 35.5%, most (70.8%) were Democrats who saw no problem with the Biden bile.

In the polling, 89.1 percent of Republicans said it was a “dangerous escalation,” with 4.7 percent saying it was acceptable, which is not very Republican. 

Most importantly, independent likely voters in large part (62.4%) called Biden's speech a "dangerous escalation." Biden is circling the bowl with this group and that's good news for Republicans, and matches the new YouGov poll that found him tanking with these voters in approval generally, at only 26.7 percent approval and 64.1 percent disapproval.

“These numbers reveal that most voters were sickened and deeply disturbed by what they saw last week. When you couple this finding with previous polling we did indicating a majority of voters also hold President Biden responsible for America’s divisions—it’s clear that the man who promised to unite the nation has become the most divisive President in American history,” said Mark Meckler, President of the Convention of States.

“When voters tell you they think that the prepared remarks of a sitting President of the United States is a dangerous escalation and was designed to incite conflict, we are living in terrifying times. Perhaps even more terrifying is the fact that a huge majority of Democrats think this was just a routine, election year stump speech,” Meckler said.

“This is the tyranny the founders of America foresaw, and it’s why they included an emergency provision in Article V that empowers the states to reign in an out-of-control federal government. A Convention of States needs to happen and urgently,” he added.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Whoever the ideologue is that's behind Biden's speech and actions [and we know he isn't doing anything on his own aside from hair-sniffing and crapping himself] they did not get the result they hoped for in this speech.

Tweet

CNN's Stelter has 'sexist' interview with Jenna Ellis: Trump wants apology

Compromised News Network (CNN) host Brian "The Bald-headed Stooge" Stelter went on a "sexist and demeaning" attack in an interview Sunday with Jenna Ellis, the Trump's senior legal adviser. The administration is seeking an apology from the anti-Trump network with the chance of that forthcoming about the same as seeing a unicorn eating a banana.

Stelter began to discuss President Trump's use of the term "fake news media," and evidently took it personally for good reason. Ellis praised Trump's courage to go up against the anti-Trump press which got Stelter to clutch his pearls.

Stelter responded, “You understand that someday you’re going to regret this, right?” he said. “Someday you’re going to regret this when your kids and your grandkids look back at this time.” 

Such great "reporting" from such a great "journalist."

Ellis, clearly intellectually superior to Stelter by leaps and bounds, and is a constitutional law attorney, fired back, “Oh, now you’re going with personal attacks, that’s when you know you lost the debate, Brian.”

Stelter, a "Just for Men" dropout and frequent Twitter user, later tweeted that his “Twitter mentions are still exploding” along with his digestive tract, and retweeted David Brody, the chief political analyst, who said, “Did you see @brianstelter getting totally destroyed by @jennaellisesq today on @CNN? It was thorough domination. She called him an activist, not a journalist.”

Ellis said that Stelter has an agenda, which is "anti-Trump," and said that makes him an activist, not a journalist.

In a feeble attempt to defend himself and unclutch his pearls, the Bald-headed Stooge and host of "Reliable Sources" [an obvious oxymoron] retweeted a political reporter at CNN who said that Stelter made the [sexist] comment after Ellis lied.

"Note that Ellis was lying about CNN’s poll," Eric Bradner, a leftist political reporter, tweeted. "The 14-pt Biden lead is among registered voters."

CNN recently reported that the Trump campaign demanded the [so-called] news outlet retract a poll that showed him trailing by 14 points among registered voters. CNN said it stood by the poll.

Ms. Ellis and Michael Glassner, the chief operating officer for the campaign, told the network in a statement earlier this week that, "It's a stunt and a phony poll to cause voter suppression, stifle momentum and enthusiasm for the President, and present a false view generally of the actual support across America for the President."

Ellis said on Sunday, “The only reason CNN published this because it’s junk science." She said, “No pollster in the world would stand behind this as a legitimate poll, according to industry standards.”

“That’s a normal polling procedure,” Stelter falsely claimed, as the numbers and timing of the poll was skewed to favor Joe Biden.

The poll was among a sample of 1,259 respondents and conducted via phone from June 2-5, 2020, according to CNN. Fifty-five percent of responders said they would vote for Biden, compared to 41 percent for Trump. What the poll did not mention was that only 25 percent of respondents were Republicans and conducted prior to Trump's positive economic numbers that were released on Friday. And, of the 1,259 adults, 1,125 were actually registered to vote.

Ellis later tweeted that no other poll shows such "false numbers" as CNN's.

Pardo wrote that she has had enough of these “liberal activists masquerading as journalists” who constantly insult conservative women “for having the audacity to think for ourselves and go against the fake news narrative they are pushing that day.”

Remember, if you don't vote for Biden, you ain't black, he said. 

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

MSNBC's Distrust of NBC and American Public

Most Americans agree with the CIA's Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT) according to an NBC poll. Yes, I said NBC. Fully 51% of respondents to the poll believe that interrogation techniques used on the Bush administration were acceptable. Only 28% said EIT went too far.

One American who actually works for the network, didn't appear to believe her own network's poll. Andrea Mitchell, wife of Alan Greenspan, and host of her own MSNBC show apparently didn't like the numbers in the poll. 

But Mitchell is an uber-liberal and uber-liberals don't need actual data to tell them what is real and what they believe is real.

Speaking to NBC's chief foreign so-called correspondent, Richard Engel, she warned her audience of 57 (same as the number of states in the Union, according to Barack Obama) that polling is "always an imprecise measure because of the way questions are asked." 

She might have wanted NBC to phrase the question: "If it was your aunt Minnie or any loved one was being tortured by waterboarding and sleep deprivation, would you have approved of those methods?"

Engel, Mitchell's 'yes man,' agreed with her. He said that those responding to the poll were simply responding emotionally (not that emotions have anything to do with libtard thinking) and that they might have been proven morally wrong by "history." 

They might have been proven factually necessary by current events if they had not been used and we had another 911.

But nothing stops an uber-liberal from opining. Mitchell showed how she feels about democracy when she asked, "Should pubic opinion really be setting policy?"

No Andrea. Your husband set interests rates without asking us. Why shouldn't you set policy?

Engel, ever the butt-boy, agreed with her saying, "Exactly."

Now you know why MSNBC leaves a sucking sound on your TV when you turn it off.



Tweet