Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts

Saturday, February 24, 2024

UPDATE: Trump v Haley in the South Carolina Primary: the votes are in!


Correction: The original post said 99% of the votes were in but this was misread and was only 4%. However, it looks a lot like he's going to win.

In the primary race between Donald Trump and Nikki Haley it looks like the former President is going to win. The polls have just closed by Trump has 64% to Haley's 36% .

Trump had.The SC Governor Henry McMaster spoke and kept it brief. Then Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and he was even briefer because the crowd tended to boo him.

Now the quick vote reading is trump 68% to Haley's 32%. at 7:25 p.m. as he gave kudos to firebrand Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-GA) along with others.

7:30 p.m. 54% to 45% Trump v Haley respectively as Trump's speech ended with 4% of the vote in. 

So he will likely win.

UPDATE: With 36% of the vote in, Trump 59% Haley 40%

Thursday, February 8, 2024

After Haley loses Nevada, says "Trump rigged it"


Former Republican and current mystery, Nikki Haley spoke in an interview Wednesday regarding her loss to "none of these candidates" in the GOP presidential primary. She said that the process was "rigged" by former President Donald J. Trump.

It's amazing how some people claim that he's incompetent, but these same folks believe he can cause the planted to heat, the tides to rise, and half the nation rise up in an insurrection. Now we have a so called Republican presidential hopeful who blames Trump for a "rigged" Arizona primary. 

Haley won 31% of the vote in the state, while 63% of those who participated in the primary chose “None of These Candidates,” with 89% of the vote counted, according to The New York Times. No delegates are awarded in the state’s primary, only the state’s caucus, which she didn't sign up for.


When asked if the loss to the none vote “hurt,” Haley responded: “No, I mean, Nevada, it’s such a scam. They were supposed to have a primary. Trump rigged it so that the GOP chairman, who’s been indicted, would go and create a caucus. We knew months ago that we weren’t going to spend a day or a dollar in Nevada, because it wasn’t worth it.”

C'mon, Nikki. Be real.

“And so we didn’t even count Nevada. That wasn’t anything we were looking at,” she said. “We knew that was rigged from the start. Our focus is on South Carolina, Michigan, and Super Tuesday. So, if you look what we did in Iowa and you look at what we did in New Hampshire, we’re continuing to grow. That’s what matters, I think, more than anything else.”

“But look at what happened this week,” she continued. “Here you have, Republicans lost a major vote on the border, Republicans lost a major vote on Israel. Donald Trump was found that he will not have immunity in all of these court cases coming up. The RNC chair is fired. All of this chaos is happening around us and Donald Trump’s fingerprints are on every bit of it. We can’t continue as the Republican Party to go forward with this chaos. You don’t defeat Democrat chaos with Republican chaos. And that’s why we’ve got to see a change.”

I liked her when she was our ambassador to the U.N. She stood her ground against the Islamic anti-Semites and refused to back down and side with them against Israel.

But that was then and this is now.

I suspect she's thinking that Trump may be in enough legal trouble, perhaps even in prison, and she could just waltz right in and be the candidate. I don't think she really knows Trump and his magic tricks.

Wednesday, January 24, 2024

Nancy "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi blasts Trump for 'cognitive' issue, then mixes up Biden with Trump


You can't make this stuff up. First our barely sentient President Biden attacked former President Trump for seeming to mix up Nikki Haley with Nancy Pelosi. Now we have Pelosi challenging Trump's cognitive abilities and got him confused with Joe Biden. 

The former House Speaker said she wouldn't get involved with discussing Trump's "cognitive disorders" on Tuesday before briefly confusing President Biden with 'The Donald.'

MSNBC's comrade Rachel Maddow asked Pelosi about Trump's attempt to attack the former speaker over the response to Jan. 6, but appeared to confuse Pelosi with GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley. "We’ve heard what Nikki Haley thought about that, that confusion, that mistake by Donald Trump. But I don’t know what you thought about it, and I’m curious," comrade Maddow said.

Pelosi said she wouldn't spend too much time on Trump's "cognitive disorders" before having a brief slip-up herself.

"Well, let me just say, I’m not going to spend too much time on Donald Trump’s cognitive disorders," she said. "He tried to say that Nikki Haley did not allow the National Guard to come, but it was Nancy Pelosi. It was nobody. It was Joe – it was Donald Trump. He knows, and you know, that Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, and I begged for hours for the National Guard to come."

The slip-up of "Joe's" name is likely an unconscious trigger based upon Biden's obvious cognitive decline. It's therefore easy to confuse him with someone who she was trying to blame for the slip-up. 

"He knows that we don’t have the authority to bring the national guard, the president does. Sad to say to the District of Columbia, because every other state, the governor has that power. So, I’m more concerned about what he was trying to accuse her of, and again, his many misrepresentations. But don’t spend so much time on him. We don’t agonize about him," Pelosi said, her hands nearly a blur as her dentures did the Electric Slide.

So we have the pot calling the kettle cognitively impaired. Nancy Pelosi is not a rocket surgeon, that's for sure.

Monday, January 22, 2024

Biden mocks Trump for mixing up names: POTUS too demented to see the irony


Um

President Joseph Robinette Biden in a brief moment of clarity, remembered that he will likely be running against former President Donald J. Trump “some day.” So on Sunday he went after Trump in a most ironic way.

Trump seemed to mix up Nikki Haley, his Republican (RINO) rival with former Speaker Nancy “Dances with Dentures” Pelosi,  Democrat. One might say that the mistake is understandable since Haley seems more like a Democrat than a Republican, but still it’s a mistake.

But for Biden to point fingers at Trump for misspeaking is hilarious.

“I don’t agree with Nikki Haley on everything, but we agree on this much: She is not Nancy Pelosi,” Biden posted on X, attaching a campaign ad that knocked Trump for the mix-up and highlighted concerns about his mental fitness.

However, Biden attacking anyone over their mental fitness is like Joy Behar attacking Melania Trump for being ugly, or Sunny Hostin attacking Sen. Tim Scott for being “too white."


The ad included remarks from Haley, the former governor of South Carolina and UN ambassador, reacting to Trump’s comments made on Friday.

In the ad, Haley’s comments from a Saturday rally were interspersed with moments from Trump’s rally on Friday and from earlier rallies.

“Last night, Trump is at a rally. And he’s going on and on, mentioning me multiple times as to why I didn’t handle January 6 better. I wasn’t in office then. They’re saying he got confused,” Haley said in the ad.

“He got confused. He got confused and said he was running against Obama. He never ran against Obama. Don’t put our country at risk like this,” she said.

Biden had referred to himself as the Vice President when he was President, and Kamala Harris as President. So there’s that.

As Trump has correctly said, Biden can’’t string two sentences together.



And everyone knows how lost he gets after fumbling a speech off a teleprompter and tries to find his way off stage.

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Nikki Haley comes off like a politician who can’t even say if a man can become a woman


I used to like Nikki Haley when she was the US Ambassador to the UN, but slightly less so when she was governor of South Carolina when she didn't oppose males from using female bathrooms or locker rooms.

Those were the days she seemed to stand for something, especially when the UN, as usual, attacked Israel. But she apparently changed or else her true nature has floated to the surface.

Haley was asked Monday whether she believe a man can become a woman. The obvious answer "no" never left her lips. Instead, she tap danced around the question by first discussing former President Trump and deflected from answering the question.

She was asked, "A lot of the stuff that Trump does, you know, and says, really bothers me, and I’m concerned about it. You know, one thing I saw him do was, he said that, uh, he had trouble answering the question, could a man become a woman? And I’m just wondering what, what your response to that question is?

Haley began by talking about Trump, which was totally irrelevant to the question. It felt like she wet her finger and stuck it up to see which was the political winds were blowing and pandered to the liberals.

"Look, I mean, I have said, I want to start with Trump and then get to the question. You know, this is a hard truth on my part. I believe Trump was the right president at the right time. I agree with a lot of his policies. But rightly or wrongly, chaos follows him. And everybody on this call knows that. And we can’t be a country in disarray and a world on fire and go through four more years of chaos. We won’t survive it."

Okay, whether you agree with her or not, how does that come close to answering whether a man can become a woman? 

Then she went into a discussion about surgeries for minors, which she opposes. But duh? That is also irrelevant to the question.

"Now, can a man become a woman. There’s been a lot that’s been talked about when it comes to all of these roles and all of these issues. I strongly believe that we should not allow any gender change surgeries to anyone before the age of 18. Period. We– kids now can’t get a tattoo until they’re 18. We shouldn’t have them permanently change their body until they’re 18. And that includes puberty blockers, that includes any sort of hormones that would do that.

"After the age of 18, we want to make sure people can live any way they want to live. I don’t think government needs to be in control of anybody’s life. You go live the way you want to live, you should be free to live the way you want to live, and every– government and everybody else should stay out of your way."

But Haley, do these surgeries, like cutting off a man's twig and berries and reshaping skin make him a her? Or does taking skin from a woman's arm or butt and shape it into a twig and berries make her a him? An inquiring mind wants to know. 

It's a simple question.

Megyn Kelly responded to Haley's jabbering and wasn't very happy about it.
This is utter bullshit. The WRONG ANSWER & an unnecessary weird pander to the rabid trans lobby.
The answer is NO, A MAN CANNOT BECOME A WOMAN. https://t.co/NAL7BrRHqb— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) January 15, 2024
If Haley cannot answer that simple question, how strong would she be when having to make tough decisions?

By the way, the answer is "no." 

Thursday, November 9, 2023

GOP candidates give their positions on Israel


The five Republican presidential candidates gave their positions regarding Israel on Wednesday night's third debate and the role the U.S. should play in the Israel-Hamas war. 

The debate was hosted by NBC News and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was first to reply about the strategy he would take against Hamas, who on October 7th killed 1,400 Israelis, wounded over 5,000, and took 241 hostages of all ages in a brutal and sadistic attack. 

“I would be telling [Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu], finish the job once and for all with these butchers, Hamas,” he said. “They’re terrorists, they’re massacring innocent people, they would wipe every Jew off the globe if they could — he cannot live with that threat right by his country — that Hamas should release every hostage and they should unconditionally surrender.”

“I’m sick of hearing the media, I’m sick of hearing other people blame Israel just for defending itself,” he continued. “We will stand with Israel in word and in deed, in public and in private. And I can tell you, as governor, I actually did something about it. Biden’s neglect has been atrocious. We had Floridians that were over there after the attack. He left them stranded. They couldn’t get flights out. So I scrambled resources in Florida. I sent planes over to Israel, and I brought back over 700 people to safety. There could have been more hostages had we not acted.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the UN and South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley answered next as she is the second ranked presidential candidate for the GOP [not including former President Trump, who is first].

“The first thing I said to him when it happened was I said, ‘finish them, finish them,'” Haley said. “And the reason is, I worked on this every day when I was at the United Nations. And we have to remember that they have to one, eliminate Hamas, two, support Israel with whatever they need whenever they need it, and three, make sure we bring our hostages home.”

“We need to be very clear-eyed to know there would be no Hamas without Iran, there would be no Hezbollah without Iran, there would not be the Houthis without Iran,” she continued. “And there wouldn’t be the Iranian militias in Syria and Iraq that are trying to hit our military men and women if it hadn’t been for Iran — and who is funding Iran right now? China is buying oil from Iran; Russia is getting drones and missiles from Iran; and there is an unholy alliance. We need to be clear-eyed, the last thing we need to do is to tell Israel what to do; the only thing we should be doing is supporting them in eliminating Hamas. It is not that Israel needs America. America needs Israel. They are the tip of the spear when it comes to this Islamic terrorism. And we need to make sure that we have their backs in that process.”

Vivek Ramaswamy was the next candidate to answer the question. He said that he would not provide support for Israel's war effort as he wanted to “avoid making the mistakes” of spending money in foreign wars, which is not the typical way to treat allies. This writer believes that it's a mistake not to support our allies in foreign wars, especially Israel, as the Jewish State is our closest ally and is strategically located in the Middle East where Islamic nations hope to eventually destroy the West and create a world caliphate. All one needs to do is consider the UK and France as bellwethers. 

“The founding vision of Israel was based on the idea that they don’t want to depend on anybody else’s sympathy or direction in defending themselves,” Ramaswamy falsely claimed. “So what I would tell Bibi is that Israel has the right and the responsibility to defend itself. I would tell him to smoke those terrorists on his southern border. … That’s his responsibility.”

Yes, he's correct in part, but while Iran provides weapons to the enemies of the little nation of Israel, the United States, as an ally, has at the very least, a moral responsibility. Ramaswamy is a smooth talker but he's not presidential material in my humble opinion.

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) said that Netanyahu has a responsibility to wipe Hamas off the map and that the U.S. would support Israel in its efforts. He added that alleged President Biden must be willing to strike Iran to stop the attacks from its terrorist proxies on U.S. forces in the region. However, while his idea makes sense, this might ignite an all-out World War 3 and that's a problem for me.

“If you want to make a difference, you cannot just continue to have strikes in Syria on warehouses, you actually have to cut off the head of the snake, and the head of the snake is Iran, and not simply their proxies,” he said. “In order for us to have a powerful response from America, we have to be in a position of strength. As President of the United States, my foreign policy is simple: you cannot negotiate with evil, you have to destroy it.”

Former New Jersey Governor and Trump-hater, Chris Christie said that he would provide any level of support that Israel needed to preserve its sovereignty. Good answer but he has as much chance winning the GOP nomination as a Rachel Levine would have as a fan dancer in Gaza. 

“Remember that Hamas’ main goal is to get rid of Israel, is to get Israel absolutely off the map,” the big guy said. “Now, there are three things I think I would say to him when he asked for advice. The first I would say is that it is absolutely your obligation to protect the territorial integrity of Israel. Secondly, to make sure you protect the security and the safety of your people. Every time something happens to compromise either one of those things, it creates greater unrest in the entire region.”

He said that Netanyahu must make sure that Hamas can never do this again and that he needs to be focused on Iran and working with Western nations and the Gulf States to isolate Iran “so their only friends in the world are part of the evil foursome of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.”

I agree with Christie but would never support him for the nomination because I don't trust him.



Tuesday, May 16, 2023

DeSantis endorses Kelly Craft in KY governor's election: Trump won't like it



Lexington, Kentucky where horseshoes are lucky -- Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) sounds as if he's going to move forward with the 2024 election run because on Monday, he used his popularity to endorse for Kentucky governor the former U.N. Ambassador Kelly Craft. She will be attempting to unseat a redstate Democratic governor, Andy Beshear in the November general election.

"Hello, this is Governor Ron DeSantis, coming to you from the free state of Florida. You've had a woke, liberal governor who's put a radical agenda ahead of Kentuckians. The stakes couldn't be higher. I know what it takes to stand up for what's right, and Kelly Craft's got it. She's proven it," DeSantis said in a recorded statement. 

DeSantis continued, "[I]'m strongly encouraging you to go out and vote for my friend, Kelly Craft. Kelly shares the same vision we do in Florida. She will stand up to the left as they try to indoctrinate our children with their woke ideology. Kelly will fight against crazy ESG policies that are trying to end the coal industry in Kentucky. And Kelly's going to do everything in her power to end the fentanyl crisis that is hurting Kentucky families." 

"When you vote tomorrow, Tuesday, May 16th, vote for my friend, Kelly Craft, and get Kentucky on the path to becoming a free state like Florida," he said.




So it looks as if DeSantis and former President Trump are going to go toe-to-toe in the presidential nomination race via dueling endorsement power. Trump had backed Craft's opponent Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron early on, and stayed with Cameron even though she was his ambassador to Canada and then U.N. ambassador after Nikki Haley resigned and is now another GOP candidate. Of course DeSantis has yet to announce, and that appears to be coming soon.

Trump held a tele-rally supporting Cameron earlier this week but has not appeared in person even though this race is seen as a bellwether for the GOP chances of kicking Biden out of the White House and winning back the Senate in 2024. 

Others who have put their support behind Craft is Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY), and National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd.

Craft and Cameron face an additional ten Republican candidates.


Saturday, April 22, 2023

BREAKING:Biden will launch 2024 re-election campaign--report

"Let me be clear, bazibatiman plamitom cosblat"


According to the NY Post, our so-called President Joe Biden, is probably going to announce the launch of his presidential re-election campaign next week, according to multiple reports. If true, Biden will be the oldest and most decrepit person to run for that office, and if he wins, would be the least competent to be in that position. But not to worry, he really isn't running the country anyway.

The 80-year-old geriatric and his team are finalizing plans to release a video announcement on April 25 — the four-year anniversary of the start of his successful 2020 campaign, the Washington Post reports. The GOP can hardly wait to see the number of edits the video will produce as it's obvious Biden can't string two sentences together without a gaffe.

Due to Biden's mental decline, the Post reported that those who know of his plans, the campaign kick-off could be delayed even further.

Do the math: as the oldest president in US history, if he actually gets re-elected, he would be 86 when he leaves, if he doesn't leave in a box first. But he has been saying many times that he intends to run for re-election, and his eminent wife, Doctor Jill Biden, said in February, that he aging husband would seek a second term [or face her wrath].

Doctor Jill Biden reportedly began preparations for Joe's run, with or without his knowledge, in September of last year, along with White House advisers Anita Dunn, Mike Donilon and Jen O’Malley Dillon. It apparently came as a pleasant surprise to Joe who flashed his signature smile and waved at people in the jasmine of his mind.

The timing of when to announce Biden’s 2024 run has reportedly been a source of debate among his inner circle of Chinese oligarchs. 

Others, including advisers and close allies told Axios earlier this month that they didn’t expect the president to formally announce his candidacy before this summer, with some members of his team reportedly pushing to hold off until sometime after the start of the third political fundraising quarter on July 1, which, coincidentally, is also Canada Day.

Late last year, it was suggested that Biden would and should announce soon after the start of 2023 so as to give the Democrats time to come up with another crisis that would force him to stay out of the public's scrutiny. Going to war with a weak country was a possible consideration.

The second political fundraising quarter ends June 30, giving Biden just over two months to reap post-announcement donations if his campaign launches next week. 

A re-election bid by Biden has the potential to set up a 2020 rematch with former President Donald Trump, who announced his third consecutive White House bid on Nov. 15 and has apparently been slowly moving over to the left. 

In an interview with Tucker Carlson of Fox News, Trump said, "[I] used to get along great with Gavin Newsom." 

Tucker was obviously surprised and asked, "Wait, you got along with Gavin Newsom?"

Trump: "He was always very nice to me. He said the greatest things."

Tucker: "About you?"
Trump: "About me." pic.twitter.com/qO6ebk307V
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 12, 2023

I know I might sound like a RINO but there's more about Trump that's disturbing. For example, he endorses Stacy Abrams over Brian Kemp:

"Of course, having her [Stacey Abrams] might be better than having your existing governor [Brian Kemp]."pic.twitter.com/XLSd9ogyM8

— Facts Nordau (@MaxNordau) April 12, 2023

Trump even took the Bud Light side because it went against Ron DeSantis, and the former president said that he is committed to "no federal role" on the abortion issue:
Donald Trump just committed to "no federal role" on the issue of abortion.

In other words, he's pro-choice now.https://t.co/ogefjF5hxK
— Jon Schweppe (@JonSchweppe) April 20, 2023
Now let me be very clear; if it came down to Trump and any Democrat, Trump gets my vote. But don't believe that he's a true conservative because facts matter. But pro-lifers have always supported Trump and are probably going to feel abandoned. While they will likely not vote for a Democrat, they are likely to be adamant about voting at all, which might mean that we will have another four years of a brain addled POTUS.

Whatever happens, things are going to get interesting over the next several months. We have Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaxxer and Marianne Williamson, a flaky self-help guru running on the left, and Trump running against Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswami running on the right, with Ron DeSantis not yet declaring his candidacy. 

Buckle up.


Monday, March 27, 2023

Ron takes lead over Don in early Iowa, NH polls



Although he has yet to declare his candidacy for the 2024 presidential primary race, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is outperforming former President Donald Trump in Iowa and New Hampshire, according to surveys conducted by top Republican firm Public Opinion Strategies. Both states have early voting so this is where voters in other states pay close attention.

The results of the surveys, which were provided to Axios, were conducted from March 21 to 23 for an outside client — not a candidate or super PAC. It found that DeSantis is ahead of Trump by eight points (45% to 37%) in Iowa and tied with Trump in New Hampshire (39% each).

The other candidates who have announced their intention to run, including Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy and Mike Pence, are well-behind both DeSantis and Trump.

DeSantis had a significant advantage over Trump in the 'favorability' vs. unfavorability' category, where he rated 81% - 11% while Trump trailed him 74% - 24%. Haley's favorability/unfavorability was 60% - 19% and Pence's was 59% - 35%.

In the Granite State DeSantis' favorability rating was 77% - 15% while Trump's was 69% - 29%; Haley's was 54% - 23%; Pence was 50% - 43%.

In spite of DeSantis' high numbers, a significant number of Republicans said they didn't see him as "the best candidate to defeat Joe Biden," even though a box of dead bunnies has a higher intellectual capacity than the current alleged POTUS.

In New Hampshire, only 48% of respondents said DeSantis was the clear candidate to defeat the brain addled Biden, while only 46% thought Trump was more electable.

However, in Iowa, DeSantis fared better with 54% saying they believe him to be more electable than Biden; while Trump had 44% saying the same thing about the former president.

Similarly, 68% of Iowa Republicans said they believe DeSantis has a better temperament than Trump. Of those surveyed in New Hampshire, 71% agreed. 

Things will likely change as they always do in time before the primaries, but once DeSantis announces his candidacy, which he almost certainly will, it should not surprise us to see blood in the water and changes in the numbers.

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Doctor Jill Biden says it's "ridiculous" for an elderly US President to undergo a cognitive eval just because he is often forgetful and confused

Doctor Biden just told her husband the number of remaining neurons he still has

One of America's top doctors, according to the brain trusts of "The View," Doctor Jill Biden spoke about her fully intact husband and alleged President Joe Biden after she was asked whether he should take a competency exam for old politicians.

The idea that elderly politicians such as Biden and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) who is 89, and who barely seem to be oriented to person, place and time should be tested seemed repugnant to Doctor Biden, perhaps because it would not only confuse them, but make them feel unsafe and vulnerable.

It was Republican Nikki Haley who proposed the idea of testing all politicians over the age of 75. 

Haley is running for the 2024 presidential nomination and has experience as the Gov. of South Carolina as well as United Nations Ambassador for the US, both positions handled extremely well. Her age proposal for cognitive testing may have also been a shot at Donald Trump, who also will be running and is currently the person to beat for the GOP.

During a Democrat-friendly interview, Doctor Biden called the proposal by Haley, a “ridiculous” idea.

“We would never even discuss something like that,” she added when asked if her husband would consider such a test, according to CNN.

Of course Joe Biden wouldn't discuss that, nor consent to it because he has difficulty discussing things using words, while on some level he is able to recognize that cognitive tests aren't totally multiple choice.

"It's ridiculous," Doctor Biden repeated. 

At 80, Joe Biden is the first and only President in history to ever match his IQ with his chronological age.

Democrats know that if Joe Biden takes a written cognitive test, he is very likely to eat the paper and this would only serve as fodder for Russian President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders who enjoy making fun of him.

Sadly, Biden even has difficulty figuring out how to walk up stairs, although his descents have mostly been spot on. 

* * *

Sex!? Yes, sex sells but so what? If you enjoy reading this blog, please check out the ads on this page. There is absolutely no obligation to buy anything [this isn't Communist China or Russia, after all] but simply clicking on an ad brings sweet, sweet revenue to my blog and helps in the fight against fascism. But sex is still okay, right?

* * *

And let us not forget about Sen. Bernie Sanders (Communist-VT) who is 81 and as fresh as a once-used fabric softener paper. He called Haley's proposal "absurd." He encouraged people to fight against "ageism" even when it comes to being a commercial airline pilot "or a pawn star."

Doctor Jill Biden says that it's Joe's decision whether or not to take a cognitive test, but should it be? I mean, isn't decision-making the point?


Friday, February 12, 2021

Nikki Haley breaks with Trump: "We should have never followed him"



Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, was interviewed by Politico in which she said that the former President "let us down." 

Haley explained that "He [Trump] went down a path he shouldn't have, and we shouldn't have followed him, and we shouldn't have listened to him. And we cant let that ever happen again."

This is coming from someone who initially referred to former President Trump as her "friend."

Haley's anger comes from Trump's refusal to concede the 2020 election to Joe Biden, and she told Politico that she hasn't spoken to Trump since the January 6 riot. She also added that much of her anger comes from Trump's negative comments about former VP Mike Pence.

“When I tell you I’m angry, it’s an understatement,” Haley said. “Mike has been nothing but loyal to that man. He’s been nothing but a good friend of that man. … I am so disappointed in the fact that [despite] the loyalty and friendship he had with Mike Pence, that he would do that to him. Like, I’m disgusted by it.”

As to what she thought of the ongoing impeachment proceedings, Haley said that it was a  “waste of time,” adding that Trump will never run for office again.

“I don’t think he’s going to be in the picture,” she said. “I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far.”

Politico claims Haley is positioning herself for a 2024 presidential run. The prediction is likely based on the fact that she recently announced a new political action committee named after her Stand for America advocacy group.

According to Haley, Trump had radically changed toward the end of his term in office.

Now she asks the Republican Party to go forward, to move on from Trump and return to being a "good, valuable, effective party."

“I mean, I’m deeply disturbed by what’s happened to him,” she said.

Please comment about your thoughts on Haley's position in the comment section.


Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.




Friday, January 8, 2021

Nikki Haley views Trump Twitter ban as act of Communism, others see Jack Dorsey as a Nazi


Banning President Trump from Twitter and Facebook is worse than Watergate. Throw in Instragram, and Twitch and now it's worse than Hitler. The Apple Store went so far as to remove Parler's app from its store. Parler is the free speech alternative to Twitter.

Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley went on Twitter, where Trump no longer treads, and slammed the tech giants in their attempts at "silencing people" akin to "what happens in China, not our country."

Well, evidently it just happened in our country and it's probably going to get worse.

Haley's tweet was posted soon after Twitter announced it was going to permanently ban our duly elected American President from it platform.

Like Trump or hate him, if this doesn't scare you and piss you off, you are either stupid, the legacy media, or a leftist, but my redundancy is showing.

Haley's tweet:
Silencing people, not to mention the President of the US, is what happens in China not our country. #Unbelievable

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) January 8, 2021
But there's no question that it's believable.

Just this past November, Twitter flagged Haley's tweet about election fraud. She called out the Twitter scumbags for ignoring a tweet casting doubt on the Holocaust by Iran’s Ayatollah.
Wow. When Iran’s Ayatollah says the Holocaust didn’t happen, Twitter doesn’t say “this claim is disputed.” When I say ballot harvesting makes election fraud easier Twitter says that’s disputed. Wonder why conservatives don’t trust big tech? pic.twitter.com/5SGkqyOhUe

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 13, 2020
It looks like the country is splitting in half and this is a trend that has been taking place most obviously in the Obama administration after he promised to bring the country together and instead, did the exact opposite.

The left basically owns the media along with big tech. They own the message and they still want to shut us up because their message is weak and false. Everything is seen with a patina of racism and identity politics because their economics and basic human rights ideas are failures and falsehood respectively.

Joe Biden is a liar and so is Harris. The Capitol riots were horrible but they had nothing at all to do with racism. Somehow they think the American people have short memories and are too stupid to know when we are being gas lighted.

I hope you will take this small piece of advice: support websites like Daily Wire, Louder with Crowder, Washington Times, Washington Examiner, One America News Network, Newsmax, The Daily Caller, and yes, even Fox News. I know you may be having problems with Fox, but they are still the only cable network that has a few good people doing good work. Support conservative thought and I hope you continue to read Brain Flushings too.


C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.




Sunday, December 9, 2018

Lame-stream media slams POTUS for Fox News pick for UN job

If President Trump chose not to attend the funeral of George H.W. Bush the media would have called him insensitive and probably something like adolescent. He attended and all they could talk about was how he should not have been there.

Now the lame-stream media is blasting Trump's pick to replace Nikki Haley as UN Ambassador. Heather Nauert was the person he nominated and now they're questioning her qualifications and point out that he typically picks people who have worked at, or are currently working at Fox News.

It was okay when Obama nominated another journalist/communist, Samantha Powers, in 2013, for the same position, but hey, this is Donald Trump, and anything he does will be slammed by the leftist media.

Powers, 48, was a war correspondent for four years. She covered the Yugoslav Wars for the Boston Globe and U.S. News & World Report, as well as other publications. She was a columnist for Time while being director of a human rights center at Harvard.

She joined the Obama campaign in 2008, but was quickly forced to resign after she correctly observed Hillary Clinton to be a "monster" who was "stooping to anything" to win.

After Powers' nomination to the U.N. position, many Republicans supported her nomination such as Sens. Lindsey Graham, John McCain and independent Joe Lieberman. She was confirmed by a vote of 87-10 and served for over three years then succeeded by Nikki Haley.

But now that Trump has nominated as Haley's replacement Heather Nauert, a former Fox News journalist, the media has a problem with that.

Nauert has worked as a journalist for twenty years and also served as a government affairs consultant, working on issues such as Social Security, insurance and taxes, as well a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

This is not "What About-ism," it's about media bias.

In April last year, the U.S. Department of State announced that Nauert would become the department spokesperson. This past March, she was named Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.

But Trump nominated her so the media has a problem with that.

The geniuses at the Comedy News Network (CNN) immediately called into doubt Nauert's skills. In a section of a news piece titled "Qualifications questioned," CNN cited a "senior diplomat" who said, "This is extraordinary. Especially in the footsteps of the former ambassadors: Madeleine Albright, Susan Rice."

Susan Rice? She went on the weekend morning shows lying about Benghazi being sparked by a video when, in fact, she knew it was a lie.

In a Washington Post piece headlined "The Foxification of the Trump White House, visualized," the super-liberal rag complained about the "remarkable bit of interplay between the administration and the network that is also the only one Trump has praised regularly since taking office ..." And Obama and the left constantly attacks.

In other words, it's really getting to them.

Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, who served under George W. Bush, noted the hypocrisy. "More than 26 reporters went into the Obama Administration. I guess that was fine with the press back then, but not now," he tweeted.

Erik Wemple, a Washington Post "reporter", responded to Fleischer's tweet: "All right: Were they from the same cable-news network -- the same cable-news network that the president watches for hours and hours each day, and gets bogus information from?"

Fleischer ate his lunch, responding: "No, silly. Barack Obama had his pick of reporters from every network, newspaper and magazine. They almost all fell for him, and those who didn’t join his Administration loved him and gave him soft coverage for 8 years."

Bite it, Wemple.


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah.




Thursday, December 6, 2018

Trump was right about Iran

Western European leaders are finally realizing that President Trump made the right move about getting rid of the Iran nuclear deal. Some of the statements he made on the deal were:
"The fact is this was a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made. It didn't bring calm, it didn't bring peace, and it never will."

"At the heart of the Iran deal was a giant fiction that a murderous regime desired only a peaceful nuclear energy program. Today, we have definitive proof that this Iranian promise was a lie."
Diplomats on Tuesday, from the U.K., the Netherlands and France expressed concerns with the Saturday medium-range ballistic missile test Iran performed.

U.S.  officials stated that the latest missile Iran tested could reach Europe and the Middle East.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, said that the missile could carry multiple warheads and that it violated Security Council Resolution 2231, which instructed Iran to refrain from “any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology.”

That resolution was the implementation of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA).

President Trump walked away from the deal last May, but China, France, Germany, Russia and the U.K. stayed with the deal.

However, after the missile test, the U.K. and France called a closed-door meeting of the Security Council. The government of France stated that, “France is concerned by the launch of a medium-range ballistic missile by Iran on Saturday. It condemns this provocative and destabilizing act. France reiterates that the Iranian ballistic missile program is not in compliance with UNSCR 2231 (2015). It calls on Iran to immediately cease any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be able to carry nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology.”

Finally, France removed its collective cranium from its deepest recesses of its collective nether regions.

As Fox News reports, the European ambassadors joined in expressing their concern:

U.K. Ambassador Karen Pierce called the actions "part and parcel of Iran's destabilizing activities in the region."

Her words echo U.K. Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, who on Saturday admitted that he was “deeply concerned by Iran’s actions," even as he reiterated support for the nuclear deal to avoid having to look like the U.K. was stupid to go along with it. “Provocative, threatening and inconsistent with UNSCR 2231. Our support for JCPoA in no way lessens our concern at Iran’s destabilizing missile program and determination that it should cease,” he tweeted.

Dutch Ambassador Karel van Oosterom added, “This kind of ballistic missile activity is inconsistent with the JCPoA , especially Annex B which calls on Iran not to engage in these kinds of activities.”

So Trump was right--the deal was a waste of paper and a lot of U.S. currency.

Even French Ambassador François Delattre avowed the test was "inconsistent" with the resolution, and he urged the terrorist nation to "immediately cease any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be able to carry nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology."

To which Iran replied: "Allahu Akbar!"

Still, the group displayed its usual wussyshistic  attitude toward Iran, with the resolution stating it only “calls upon” Iran to stop its ballistic tests instead of demanding a cessation. Adding: "Please don't get mad at us."

On Tuesday, U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley, in her typically gutsy manner, said the ballistic test was "dangerous and concerning, but not surprising" adding, “The United States has repeatedly warned the world about Iran’s deliberate efforts to destabilize the Middle East and defy international norms. The international community cannot keep turning a blind eye every time Iran blatantly ignores Security Council resolutions. If the Security Council is serious about holding Iran accountable and enforcing our resolutions, then at a minimum we should be able to deliver a unanimous condemnation of this provocative missile test."

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), whose father did not take part in any assassination attempts said, “The United States has only begun to reverse the damage done by Obama's Iran nuclear deal, which gave the Ayatollahs the resources and diplomatic breathing room to build more and better ballistic missiles. The last round of sanctions, while important, clearly failed to deter Iran from advancing their missile program. It's time to totally cut off Iran from the global financial system and deny them the resources they're using to threaten us and our allies.”

What do you think?


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow or not. I hope you do. Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah.



Thursday, October 4, 2018

Nikki Haley: No love? No money!

Nikki Haley issued a global warning to those countries that hate us: the Trump administration will no longer fund you if you hate us.

Think about it--why would anyone reward anyone else who hates them? Why give countries like Iran, who wants "Death to America" and to our ally, Israel, money to fund their ambitions?

A bigger question is: why is Trump the first president of the United States to think this way when it seems to be a fairly logical conclusion?

This is a promise Trump made on the Trump stump when he vowed to cut funding to countries that hate us.

U.N. Ambassador Haley appeared on the Brett Baier Fox News' "Special Report" on Wednesday. She spoke of the Trump foreign policy perspective in that blunt Haley way she is known for saying, "We are no longer going to give money to people who are against the U.S., or say, 'Death to America,' or do anything that would be anti-U.S."

Freaking Bravo! It's about time.

She began by speaking of the change in world attitude engendered by the foreign policy initiatives of President Trump:
"I think he's actually done a lot on foreign policy but in different ways. If you look at what he's done with North Korea, it's really led the international community to isolate North Korea to where they decide, they realize they have a decision to make. He led on the fact that he pulled out of the Iran deal. He's forcing the entire world to admit the fact that Iran was not behaving properly. He's led in Syria to make sure that chemical weapons are not being used and he's warned against them being used again."
Haley then discussed the president's attitude toward South American countries that are anti-American:
"I think that if you look in the Western Hemisphere, which we've spent the last two weeks focused on, whether it is Venezuela or Nicaragua, the messages are being sent that we are not going to support dictators."
She used that sentiment to globalize the new policies:
"We are now going to strategically start to work with our friends, and we are no longer going to be giving handouts for those who go against us."
Can I get an Amen.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tuesday, June 19, 2018

US pulls out of UN Human Rights Council: Haley disgusted with political bias

The Trump administration has withdrawn the US from the United Nations Human Rights Council. Our U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley called the 47-member council "a protector of human rights abusers, and a cesspool of political bias."

Well of course they are--they're made up of Islamic states and therefore are dedicated to anti-Zionism.

Haley said the move comes after a year where "we did not see any progress." She threatened to pull-out last year, citing years of U.S. complaints that the council is biased against Israel. [For more information as to why Islamic nations are biased against Israel and the Jews, see the Koran and Sunna.] This move, it must be noted, comes a day after the U.N. human rights chief denounced the Trump administration for separating migrant children from their parents in Obama and G.W. Bush style.

"I want to make it crystal clear that this step is not a retreat from our human rights commitments. On the contrary. We take this step because our commitment does not allow us to remain a part of a hypocritical and self-serving organization that makes a mockery of human rights," Haley said. "We did not make this decision lightly. When this administration began 17 months ago, we were well aware fo the enormous flaws in the Human Rights Council. We could have withdrawn immediately. We did not do that. Instead, we made a good faith effort to resolve the problems."

Trump has long been rightly critical of the UNHRC as it has shown a bias against Israel.

Haley slammed the Council for its "relentless, pathological campaign" against Israel.

I wouldn't call it pathological unless you consider orthodox Islam as such. It is clear in Islamic scripture that the Jews are to be hated and have been compared to apes and pigs. Israel is symbolic of the Jews and this is why many Muslims want it destroyed and all the Jews annihilated.

National Security Adviser John Bolton opposed the creation of the Council when he served as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. under George W. Bush.

"The U.N. Human Rights Council is headed up by some of the worst human rights violators in the world. They are actually in the leadership of the Council year after year after year," said Sen. James Lankford (R-OK). "They are anti-Israel, over and over again. That is their constant drumbeat. So, I get it, we can try to be there, so we can try to be a participant in it. But when you are there, we vote no ever time, and it just becomes a problem every time as well. So it doesn't seem to make a difference whether we are there or not there."

According to one senior official, the U.S. gave the UNHRC a year to reform and fix up its act, but it failed to do so. The official said the Council actually protects human rights abusers, allows them to serve on the Council and is clearly bias in rendering decisions. Countries such as China, Russia and Egypt have worked to undermine U.S. efforts and the Council has passed more resolutions this year condemning Israel than it has condemning Iran, Syria and North Korea COMBINED!

The Trump administration no longer wants to remain in the Council as it lends them credibility. We will only rejoin if it reforms, and the chances of that happening is practically zero to none.

To follow Brain Flushings, click the button in the margin. 


Monday, February 5, 2018

Palestinian 'peace negotiator' tell Nikki Haley to 'shut up'

Oxymoron: a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction (e.g., Palestinian peace negotiator).

A senior Palestinian official accused the Trump administration of attempting to spark a "coup" of Palestinian leadership and slammed the United States' UN Ambassador Nikki Haley. 

Saeb Erekat, a so-called "peace negotiator" for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, told Ambassador Haley to "shut up." Apparently Erekat is no less typical of many Muslim men who see women as half as intelligent, and half as valued as men, as the prophet of Islam, Mohammad, said years before he was poisoned by a woman.

Erekat is the P.A.'s head peace negotiator, a laughable oxymoron of a position for a group of radical Muslims whose idea of peace will come when all the Jews are slaughtered and Palestine takes over Israel. He complained in an interview with the Palestinian fake news agency al-Watan that Haley had "called for overthrowing the democratically elected Palestinian president."

What actually happened was that Abbas gave a speech last month that denied the Jew's historical connection to Israel, which is denying the history of the Jewish religion as depicted in the Old Testament. Abbas blasted the Trump administration's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital and Haley responded in a speech at the U.N. saying:
"A speech that indulges in outrageous and discredited conspiracy theories is not the speech of a person with the courage and the will to seek peace."
Erekat then claimed Haley's remarks amounted to a "coup" against the "Palestinian political system" and that the U.S. and Israel wanted to "undermine the Palestinian national project." [The project's slogan is: "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," meaning that all the Jews will be gone from Israel.]

"Nikki Haley needs to shut up and realize that the Palestinian leadership is not the problem," Erekat said. "Instead, the problem is the Israeli occupation and the policies it continues to pursue. I'm not saying that we don't make mistakes; every society and every government makes mistakes."

And a so-called 'peace negotiator' who tells a United States ambassador to the U.N. to 'shut up' has made the mistake of messing with the wrong country and the wrong woman using the wrong tactic.



Friday, January 26, 2018

Michael Wolff is having an affair with Michael Moore

Stupid in a suit
"Fire and Fury" author Michael Wolff is having a homosexual affair with famous fat man, Michael Moore. I can't prove it, but it rings true for me, so it has to be true, according to slime-ball Wolff's own words.

I am able to imagine Wolff and Moore cuddled up in a massive bed, all tangled up together in a disgusting knot of sweat and hair, Wolff blowing into Moores bulbous ear as he whispers, "You're my man."

It rings true.

Wolff is now accusing United States Ambassador Nikki Haley of having an affair with President Trump. That doesn't ring true to me and I believe he made that bull crap claim to sensationalize his book, a novel that has hardly any actual facts to substantiate any of Wolff's claims.

Nikki Haley, of course, flatly denied Wolff's gossip calling it "highly offensive" and "disgusting." 

"It is absolutely not true," she said. And I totally believe her because it doesn't ring true.

When asked in an interview with Bill Maher regarding the evidence of Wolff's claim about Haley, he replied: "My evidence is the book. Read the book," Wolff said, hoping to make a few more dollars from it.

"If it makes sense to you, if it strikes a chord--if it rings true, it is true."

What utter nonsense. He's implying that if it feels true then it is. Very scientific, eh?

If you use Wolff's method of how you go about exacting facts, you can consider yourself an idiot or a liberal . . . but I repeat myself.


Friday, December 22, 2017

'Morning Joe' The Hypocritical Schmoe

"The Hypocritical Schmoe"
"Morning Joe" The Hypocritical Schmoe, Joe Scarborough, slammed UN Ambassador Nikki Haley on Friday for "threatening" the General Assembly. 

Of course, when The Hypocritical Schmoe was himself a Congressman, he wanted the United States to withdraw from the United Nations altogether--he didn't mention that when he spoke about our ambassador.

Haley threatened to pull funding over the U.N. vote condemning President Trump's recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Scarborough, as liberal hypocrites go, didn't like that idea.

Joel Pollak of Breitbart News found the bill the former make-believe Republican Congressman introduced in 1995--it would have ended U.S. membership in the U.N. which is obviously more radical than what Haley said.

The hyper hypocrite Scarborough said that Haley was "no diplomat" and "an embarrassment to the United States" because of her warning to the UNGA that we will remember their lack of support the next time they need money.

But Scarborough, ever the flaming hypocrite, probably didn't think anyone would remember what he wanted to do regarding our U.N. membership. Oops.

"The United States will remember this day in which it was singled out for attack in the General Assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation," Haley said. "We will remember it when we are called upon to once again to make the world's largest contribution to the United Nations and we will remember it when so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit."

Pissed off, Scarborough said, "We're going to need them on Iran. We're going to need their help on North Korea. We may need their help again in Syria. We're going to need their help in a thousand places. And yes, they're going to need our help too. And guess what?" he asked, mimicking Dennis Rodman's famous line, "We're not going to work together if Nikki Haley is going up there humiliating the United States of America by threatening our allies over a non-binding resolution. It's just like Donald Trump's tweets," the hypocritical disrespectful scumcrumpet said. "Every response has to be a nuclear response. There is no subtlety of thought."

But what Haley may lack in subtlety, Scarborough lacks in intellect. We've used subtlety in the past with the UNGA, and with the anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic Organization of Islamic Cooperation and nothing ever changes. 

Presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama and George W. Bush have each said they would declare Jerusalem the rightful capital of Israel, but only President Trump has said it and followed through on the promise.

Joe The Hypocritical Schmoe Scarborough's bill was known as the United Nations Withdraw Act of 1995.

"Effective four years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Mission to the United Nations shall be closed and all staff and any remaining functions of such office shall be carried out through the Secretary of State and the Department of State," the hypocrite's bill stated.

Like "Morning Joe," the bill failed and he resigned in 2001. Now all he needs to do is resign in 2018.



Thursday, December 21, 2017

UN approves Turkey's anti-Zionist resolution regarding Jerusalem

The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voted in overwhelming numbers to condemn President Trump's decision to stop pretending that Jerusalem is anything but the capital of Israel as it has been written in the Old Testament thousands of years ago.

The 128 member states of the UNGA voted to condemn Trump's move and only 7 other states joined the U.S. and Israel in voting against the resolution. Thirty-five countries abstained, which effectively supports the U.S.

The vote came soon after U.S. ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, warned those states who support the resolution that there will be consequences, and reminded the General Assembly of the money we provide to the UN and many member states. Haley said the U.S. will be "taking names," a sort of military euphemism derived from "kicking ass and taking dog tags."

"We will remember it when we are called upon once again to make the world's largest contribution to the United Nations," Haley said. "And we will remember when so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit."

But they called our bluff because they know we depend on these Islamic countries to help us deal with global terrorism and they believe we will back down on the promise.

Sadly, I believe they may be correct.  I cannot imagine the U.S. cutting off all foreign aid to, say, Pakistan. They need the money to fund their military while doing what they can to aid the anti-Zionist cause.

The resolution was co-sponsored by anti-Semitic Turkey, chair of the summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, another anti-Semitic group, and chair of the Arab Group at the U.N.

They hate Israel because they hate Jews. It's there in their so-called "holy" book, the Koran.

The world has been pretending that Jerusalem is somehow not the capital of Israel when, in fact, it has been so since Israel was first discussed in the Old Testament, long before Islam was invented.

Both Democratic and Republican presidents have long said that Jerusalem is Israel's capital, but not one of them had the testicular fortitude to stand by their words until Trump came along. Like him or not, he is the only U.S. president with the courage of his convictions.

The spoils of war go to the victor and Israel was the victor against all surrounding nations who wished and failed, to destroy them.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Jerusalem is Israel's capital regardless of the outcome of the vote.

And Bibi is right.


Trump’s New Press Secretary Lasted Days Before Her Credentials Became the Story

The White House press secretary ’s job is to defend the president, handle hostile questions from the press, and explain the administration’s...