Showing posts with label Christian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2026

State takes kids away from Christian couple who refuse to agree their daughter is a boy



A Christian mom and her husband are fighting back in court after Oregon’s Department of Human Services determined that they caused “mental injury” to her daughter by refusing to “affirm” her transgender identity.

“It has destroyed our lives,” Nicole Calaway, the mother of two daughters who are now estranged because they both claim a transgender identity, told the Daily Signal in an interview Sunday. Child Protective Services took custody of her then-15-year-old daughter, K.A., on July 18, 2024, one day after Calaway and K.A. terminated the services of K.A.’s therapist, Jennifer Forster. 

According to court documents, Forster filed the complaint that resulted in K.A.’s removal. ODHS notified the Calaways that the agency considered them “responsible for the mental injury” of K.A. “Your adverse reactions to [K.A.] expressing their gender identity have caused serious harm to [K.A.’s] psychological functioning,” ODHS caseworker Rachel Woods wrote in a Sept. 13 letter. 

Calaway’s older daughter had already moved out. “I was so distraught, it felt like I was gutted,” the mother said. “Both my daughters were gone. I took myself to the hospital and admitted myself for a week because I couldn’t handle it.”

The mother remains estranged from her daughters, and Oregon has ordered her not to contact K.A. Yet the state’s findings haven’t just affected her maternal relationship. A Black Mark on the Parents’ RecordsThe “mental injury” finding constitutes a child abuse ruling on Calaway’s permanent record, and on the record of her husband, David. 

But seriously, what are the chances that both female siblings would believe they were males? That only seems to happen in the Hollywood crowd. 

The stigma of a state agency finding the two guilty of child abuse has followed them across state lines after their move to Florida in July 2025. “In Oregon, if they were to do a background check, I could have lost my notary license, I still cannot, even here, volunteer with the church, anything to do with children,” the mother told the Daily Signal.

The stigma may be even worse for her husband. Months after the two moved to Florida, the disgusting Oregon Department of Human Services determined that David Calaway had “exhibited a pattern of inappropriate grooming behaviors to include making inappropriate sexual comments while [K.A.] was in his care.” 

The husband vehemently contested the claims, saying he is innocent and was not given an opportunity to appeal. While the office made the determination in December 2025, he did not receive notification of it until May 12. 

The husband told the Daily Signal that his employment has yet to be affected by the matter, but he highlighted this message from the notice: “This abuse finding could have an impact on David Calaway’s ability to volunteer or to obtain or retain a professional license or certain types of employment.”

“If I was being accused of sexual abuse, wouldn’t there be a police record? Wouldn’t I be arrested? Wouldn’t I be in jail?” the husband asked. [I believe him.] 

“It’s like we’re guilty until proven innocent,” the mother said. The couple filed a lawsuit earlier this month, accusing the therapist, Forster, and ODHS agents of violating their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments

The lawsuit states that ODHS had previously screened out one child abuse referral against the Calaways and found a second referral unfounded, both in 2023. K.A.’s father, Keith Allison, who sought custody of the daughter, claimed that K.A. was in immediate danger, but the court denied two of his motions in 2024. 

“On essentially the same facts later used to remove K.A., a neutral court had twice declined to find immediate danger, and ODHS had already once found the mental-injury allegation unfounded,” the lawsuit states. 

On May 23, 2024, K.A. left school with a friend and did not notify her mother. She told school staff that she did not feel safe at home because her mother had showed her videos opposing transgender ideology the night before. School staff insisted she be taken to a stabilization center. Later, K.A. apologized to her mother and thanked her for helping her “acknowledge reality.” 

On July 17, Nicole Calaway and K.A. spoke on the phone with Forster, and terminated her services. Both K.A. and her mother accused the therapist of hiding information from the mother. According to the lawsuit, ODHS caseworker Rachel Woods recommended Forster call the Child Protective Services hotline shortly after this call. Forster called the hotline the next morning, and made many claims the lawsuit describes as false.

The therapist said that the mother had “presented as aggressive and angry,” and that she said K.A. “would no longer have support.” 

Forster would also write that the mother terminated counseling out of a “desire to manage client’s mental health without counseling support.” The lawsuit claims these statements were false but gave ODHS a “fabricated appearance of urgency.” 

On July 18, ODHS and law enforcement officers removed K.A. from the Calaways’ home for “mental injury.”According to the lawsuit, ODHS concluded that Nicole Calaway’s decision to show her daughter videos presenting arguments against transgender ideology harmed her daughter’s psychological functioning. The Calaways dispute this, saying the agency treated disagreement with the ideology as child abuse. “When did the truth become mental injury?” David Calaway asked in an interview with the Daily Signal.

The Calaways appealed the decisions, but ODHS stood by the finding. In November 2024, ODHS voluntarily withdrew the dependency petition, by which the department had removed K.A. from the Calaways’ home. While the department had dismissed the underlying claim, it nonetheless maintained the child-abuse findings against the Calaways. The plaintiffs argue the dismissal undercuts the state’s justification for removing K.A. from their home. 

“It began with them accusing us because we’re conservative Christians, and we don’t affirm her transgender ideology, that we provided hours of lectures to teach her daughter that this ideology isn’t right for her, and isn’t healthy for her, and they come and remove her from the home, and that was their reasoning,” the husband told the Daily Signal. 

According to the lawsuit, the Calaways refused to “affirm” K.A. as “transgender” due to their conservative Christian convictions that “a person cannot change from one sex to the other” and their view “that so-called ‘gender-affirming care,’ including ‘social transition,is harmful to children and teens and has never been proven safe or effective.” 

The lawsuit cites the United Kingdom’s Kass Review and the Department of Health and Human Services’ study finding little evidence for positive impacts from sex-rejecting procedures. The lawsuit accuses Forster of engaging in therapeutic malpractice because she “knew, or in the exercise of reasonable professional care should have known, that so-called ‘gender-affirming care,’ including social transition, is not a proven, safe, or effective treatment for an adolescent girl and is psychologically harmful.” 

Nicole Calaway told the Daily Signal she presented multiple videos to her daughter, including testimonials of detransitioners, “because I wanted her to make an informed decision. I did not want her to ruin her body. I still do not want her to ruin her body.” 

The Calaways’ lawsuit cited 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming deprivation of rights under the color of law. They claim that the therapist and ODHS official conspired to use the power of the state to interfere with Nicole Calaway’s right to direct the care, custody, and upbringing of her child under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Calaways also claim defendants violated their rights to free speech and religious freedom under the First Amendment by attempting to force them to support transgender ideology. The lawsuit also claims that ODHS directed school officials to deny Nicole Calaway access to her daughter’s educational records, even though no court order restricted her parental rights.

The Christian couple seeks compensatory and general damages of at least $5 million, special and economic damages, punitive damages, a declaratory judgment in their favor, attorney’s fees, and an injunction removing them from a child abuse registry or a sex offender registry. 

This is yet another shining example of the progressive orthodoxy machine grinding up families that dare to notice biological reality. Oregon bureaucrats decided that a Christian couple’s refusal to play along with their daughter’s sudden identity crisis counts as “mental injury.” Because nothing says child protection like yanking a teenager out of her home the day after mom and daughter fire a therapist who was apparently more interested in ideology than actual therapy.

The Calaways get branded as abusers on their permanent records for the high crime of showing videos that challenge the prevailing dogma. Dad even gets hit with a late-breaking “grooming” accusation that somehow never involved the police, an arrest, or a jail cell. Funny how that works. Meanwhile the state shrugs off earlier findings that the claims were unfounded and a court that twice refused to declare the kid in immediate danger.

When the dependency petition gets quietly withdrawn months later, the abuse findings stay on the books like a scarlet letter that follows the couple all the way to Florida. Mom can’t volunteer at church. Dad wonders out loud if actual sexual abuse accusations usually skip the part where you get arrested. 

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

“It’s like we’re guilty until proven innocent,” she said, which is a pretty accurate description of how these systems operate once the sacred “gender identity” trigger gets pulled. The couple’s lawsuit lays it out plainly: they wouldn’t affirm something their faith and common sense both reject, and the state treated that as grounds to seize their child. They pointed to the Kass Review and the HHS study that found precious little evidence that “gender-affirming care” helps anyone, let alone adolescent girls. 

The therapist is accused of malpractice for pushing the opposite. 

Mom simply wanted her daughter to see the detransitioner stories before making irreversible decisions about her own body. This is what happens when the administrative state decides that disagreement with transgender ideology is itself a form of child abuse. Parental rights, free speech, and religious liberty get treated as optional suggestions once the orthodoxy is challenged. 

The Calaways are asking for damages and to have their names scrubbed from the registries. In a saner country that wouldn’t even be a close call.

Monday, September 22, 2025

Islamist slaughter of Christians is spiking in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and it’s as brutal as it gets





The latest bloodbath went down on September 8 in Ntoyo village, North Kivu, where monsters believed to be from the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) butchered at least 64 people. These thugs proudly wave the ISIS flag like it's their local franchise of terror.

According to locals spilling the grim details to Catholic charity Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), the attackers didn't just kill; they torched homes and smashed skulls with guns and hammers. Many of the victims were gunned down or bludgeoned while mourning at a wake. That's the kind of heartless evil that we saw in Israel on October 7, 2023 against Jews.

This isn't a one-off. The DRC's Christians are being hunted. 

Mid-August saw 52 Christians massacred in North Kivu by the same ADF scumcrumpets. In July, 43 were slaughtered at a prayer vigil. And at the start of the year, 70 Christians were found beheaded in a Protestant church. Beheaded! That's how jihadis roll.

Bishop Melchisédech Sikuli Paluko of Butembo-Ben, speaking to ACN, tried to offer some comfort amid the carnage: "To all the families affected by this umpteenth and horrible carnage … and to all the faithful of the parish, we express our spiritual closeness. May God, the Master of Life, strengthen us through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, consoler of the afflicted, and lead us beyond the desert of present-day suffering to lasting peace." 

Noble words, but they underscore a sickening truth: this is happening over and over to Christians and Jews.

It's not just the DRC. Nigeria's Bishop Wilfred Anagbe told the British House of Lords earlier this year that massacres of Christians during festivals like Christmas have become "customary" in parts of his country. Customary. As in, just another Tuesday for these jihadist scum. Nigeria, despite its massive Christian population, ranks seventh on Open Doors' list of worst places for anti-Christian persecution, thanks to relentless Islamist violence.

The DRC is no picnic either as it's climbed to No. 35 on the same list, up six spots from last year, because the body count keeps rising. This isn't merely a statistic, it's a religious war, and it's getting uglier by the day.

If you would like to support my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I would genuinely appreciate it, but no pressure.

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

France's 'Christian terrorist' is not Christian


A crazed stabber in France shouted "In the name of Jesus Christ" as he went about his nefarious business of indiscriminately stabbing people and claiming to be Christian. Finally, the Left had the Christian terrorist they were looking for and the Western media went full-bore into the story.

But . . . the media's narrative got destroyed.

A Frenchman, Henri d'Anselme, heroically intervened to stop an attacker's stabbing rampage. In a recent episode of the popular French podcast, Legend, d'Anselme explained that a magistrate informed him of the attacker's true identity. The magistrate stated, "The perpetrator was not a Christian but a Muslim who had previously served in Bashar al-Assad’s army in Syria and later with the Islamic State." 

The attacker had deceitfully claimed to be a Christian in order to secure asylum in Europe but his jihadi tendencies kicked in and he couldn't help himself.

Below is a rough translation of what d’Anselme says in this video, starting at 56:41. D’Anselme began by recounting his encounter with the attacker in mid-attack:

…so he shouts “in the name of Jesus Christ,” he starts to say, “My wife, my —” I don’t really know what, finally, I don’t remember very well, and I answer, “No, no, no, not Jesus Christ, you have nothing to do with Jesus,” just, in fact, I tell him NO, I shout that. “To me, you have nothing to do with Jesus Christ, you are the devil,” I said that “you are the devil,” and that’s what I said.

That was true enough, but the next day, d’Anselme woke up to find himself in the media crosshairs. They had found their Christian terrorist at last and were anxious to get the word from someone who had been on the scene. D’Anselme recounted:

The next morning, when I was asked, “But what do you think of a Christian who shouted ‘In the name of Jesus Christ?’” I told them then, “I don’t know if he is a Christian or not, it’s almost — don’t look at — what I know is that what he did is fundamentally anti-Christian. We can’t kill children, who are innocence and purity, especially in the name of Jesus Christ, who offered himself as a sacrifice for you. See, it’s not possible, it’s against everything, it’s against the whole Bible.”

This response, of course, made no impression on the media at all. Le Monde’s headline displayed their true fake news agenda: “Annecy knife attack: Suspect Abdelmessih H. is a Christian Syrian refugee who arrived from Sweden.” 

Henri d’Anselme, however, was later given additional information that wasn’t given to the media. He continued:

"We had answers to this question since then. Yes, yes, the guy’s file is known now. I met, moreover, the magistrate who had taken care of his file. He was a former member of Bashar al-Assad’s army, a deserter, affiliated with the Islamic State, who did stupid things with the Islamic State, who found after a while that it wasn’t very funny, who therefore wanted to ask for political asylum in Europe. But he was told that to be able to have political asylum in Europe, you have to be either an Eastern Christian or homosexual, declaring as an Eastern Christian or declaring as homosexual will make the process easier for you. Therefore, he declared himself an Eastern Christian, so in fact he faked his identity in Turkey, and in fact, after that, he began a relationship with a real Christian. Suddenly he rebuilt his life with her in Sweden, but after a while the girl realized the deception. They still had a kid together and so on, but he never went to mass…."

So here we see taqiyya in full swing. Say anything, any lie, as a way to further Islam.

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Buttigieg doesn't understand how Christians can support Trump

Presidential candidate and far-left former South Bend, Indiana mayor Peter Buttigieg on Tuesday said he cannot understand how a Christian, any Christian, could support President Trump and suggested that there is no "compatibility" there.

Comedy News Network's (CNN) Erin Burnett serving as a powder puff moderator asked Buttigieg, “Do you think it is impossible to be a Christians and support this president?”

“I’m not gonna tell other Christians how to be Christians,” the man who is married to another man responded. “But, I will say, I cannot find any compatibility between the way this president conducts himself and anything I find in scripture.”

Buttigieg often speaks as if the rest of the Christian world is comprised of sinners because they refuse to believe in a woman's right to kill her baby in her womb or immediately upon exiting that womb. Earlier this month, while appearing on “The View,” he refused to denounce the murder of the unborn post-birth, or infanticide. 

The Daily Wire reported:

“It obviously in my circles was passed around everywhere because, I think, the interpretation from pro-life people like me was that you meant a baby actually being born and then possibly you know there’s a lot of controversy with Governor Northam and what it means and what time a woman should be able to have an abortion,” [co-host Meghan] McCain said. “I just wanted you to clarify because I found that statement to be pretty radical.”

[…] “But what if a woman wanted to, I don’t know, invoke infanticide after a baby was born, you’d be comfortable with that?”

“Does anybody seriously think that’s what these cases were about?” Buttigieg lashed out, avoiding a direct answer.

“There are people pushing for that, yes,” McCain noted.

Buttigieg responded by refusing disavow infanticide, because he is a "Cafeteria Christian" and by no means a moderate, as the left likes to label him.
Not in scripture
“Think, think about the situation, if this is a late-term situation, then by definition it’s one where a woman was expecting to carry the pregnancy to term, then she gets the most perhaps devastating news of her life,” Buttigieg said, using a strawman situation. “We’re talking about families that may have picked out a name, may be assembling a crib, and they learn something excruciating and are faced with this terrible choice, and I don’t know what to tell them morally about what they should do; I just know that I trust her and her decision medically or morally isn’t gonna be any better because the government is commanding her to do it in a certain way.”

Except that isn't the typical situation when a mother decides to kill her baby in the last trimester and Buttigieg knows it.

President Trump, on the other hand, has continuously supported the pro-life movement, which is a lot more Christians than Buttigieg's balderdash. 

In fact, Trump was the first president to deliver in-person remarks at the annual pro-life March for Life.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Friday, May 10, 2019

Pro-Life Philly Rally Garners over 1,000 Participants in Response to Sims' Bullying and Doxxing

Rep[ulsive] Brian Sims (D-PA) live-streamed himself bravely bullying three teenage girls and an elderly woman in front of a Philadelphia Planned Parenthood infanticide facility over the weekend. As they prayed for the lives that were being extinguished inside the building, Sims ironically told the girls and women that THEY should be ashamed and that they were not real Christians. For Sims, killing babies in the womb because of the inconvenience they may cause to the mother is the Christian way to go.

But alas, his scumbaggery was met with peaceful resistance when over 1,000 people showed up in front of the slaughterhouse at the urging of the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh, who organized the rally.

The people involved probably weren’t expecting that many folks to show up for the last-minute rally, but that’s exactly what happened.

Matt Walsh was one of the speaker’s at the successful gathering and said he was humbled by the turnout. “Pro aborts could never do what we did today. They'd never get such an energetic and overwhelming response and attendance on such short notice, or any notice. Just like they'll never hold a march as big as the March For Life. The pro-abortion movement is a sad and lethargic thing,” the prominent pro-life voice and religious Christian tweeted.

One of the highlights of the day was from “Unplanned” author Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood executive turned pro-life advocate. The movie was based on her experience having worked for PP.

Speaking to the energetic crowd, Johnson emphasized that both the mother and the child must always be treated with dignity.

“It is time to refuse to ‘choose.’ We will not choose between one or the other. We will respect both women and their children, and their femininity, and their reproduction, and their fertility. And we will continue to do it until clinics like this no longer exist, and every women who walks into a physician’s office is actually treated with love and respect and care,” she told the audience, mostly comprised of women.

Another moving moment came when the attendees prayed for the unborn.

Nate Madden of The Blaze noted that the prayer outside the clinic comes just days after the execrable Sims live-streamed himself harassing teen girls for praying outside that very clinic.

Sims was addressed directly by Walsh at the rally, too: “We are sending a message to bullies like Brian Sims. We will not be intimidated, we will not be silenced. If you try to shut us up, we are only going to get louder. If you try to shame us, we are only going to stand taller,” he told the crowd.

Though Sims was invited to attend the rally, he did not show due to his fear of grownups under the age of 60.

Ashley Garecht, the mother of two of the teenage girls Sims bullied and attempted to dox was there as well.

“I am so grateful because we are here today to witness the tangible fruit of incredible effort. And I know, I know, that there are people who have been doing this work for decades and they are not always given the gift of seeing the tangible fruit of their work,” Garecht said.

“God is moving in incredible ways and we’ve just along for the ride; we are standing on the side of angels,” she added.

Garecht and her husband have helped raise over $118,000 for the Pro-Life Union of Greater Philadelphia since Monday, so stick that in your pussy-hat, Sims.

The impressive rally was made possible by the pro-life movement teaming together and by individuals getting out and putting their feet in motion for what they believe in.

Thank you, Rep. Sims for doing all that you did to bring us together and help raise money for the plight of the unborn. Did you know that the most dangerous place for a black baby to be in New York City is in his/her mother's womb?


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.





Tuesday, April 23, 2019

What we know about the Sri Lanka attacks

Colombo, Sri Lanka -- Authorities in Sri Lanka said, weeks before the attacks that killed at least 290 Christians and hotel guests, that they had received warnings from the U.S. and India about the possibility of an attack. Squat was done to prevent them.

Some of the suicide bombers and others who lived to be arrested were linked to an Islamist group known as National Thowheeth Jamath. The government singled out the group to police for monitoring as a possible threat after foreign security services warned the island nation.

Squat.

It's likely the sophisticated and closely-timed Easter attacks were carried out with help from experienced international terrorists such as al Qaeda or ISIS, according to Sri Lankan officials who did nothing upon receiving the warnings.

“We have found that NTJ was involved in the attacks,” said Rajitha Senaratne, a government spokesman and the country’s health commissioner, using an abbreviation for what he called “a local organization,” in the spirit of the UK who calls Muslims "Asians" and pretend they have no problem.

Senaratne said the government also believes a more sophisticated international terrorist group played a part in planning and executing the bombings.

Islamic State has now publicly claimed responsibility for the attacks, which have triggered public outrage over the government’s failure to stop them.

The Sri Lankan government said it received warnings from security officials in India and the U.S. on April 4 that they had picked up indications that attacks were being planned in Sri Lanka. While those warnings didn’t include the name of a group, Sri Lankan security officials linked them to National Thowheeth Jamath in a circular it distributed to police authorities on April 9.

After an emergency meeting of the country’s security council, President Maithripala Sirisena said he would establish a special committee, led by a supreme court judge, to examine why the early warnings didn’t lead to more action to head off any attacks.

Mr. Sirisena announced a state of emergency taking effect at the end of Monday and a new curfew from evening to morning. The emergency declaration allows the military to make arrests and hold those arrested without charges or appearances before a court for more than a day. A ban on social media remains in effect in the country and there will be a ban on the wearing of burqas.

Police said they discovered 87 detonators, apparently abandoned, at a private bus stand in the capital. Two more explosive devices were also discovered, one late Sunday near the airport and another on Monday in a van near the location where one of at least eight blasts occurred on Sunday. Police conducted a controlled detonation of the device found on Monday, causing no injuries.

The group, whose name translates to National Unification Group, is known to have expressed hard-line views. The local Islamist group originated in 2009 on Sri Lanka’s east coast, where it preached a conservative form of Islam known as Salafism. The group last year came to be known for defacing Buddhist imagery and inciting religious conflict.

Had the terrorist group been located in the United States of America and Bernie Sanders became president, he would have allowed them to vote along with the Boston Marathon bomber because he knows they'd vote on the Democratic Party line.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Buttigieg shows his true BS factor



Democratic presidential hopeful, Pete Buttigieg [pronounced "Butter Judge" with a Brooklyn accent] started out his campaign sounding like a reasonable leftist whose policies would destroy America, but weren't quite on par with those of Alexandria Obviously-Comatose's socialism. Most of us on the right didn't like the ideas, but the guy seemed honest and possibly even ethical--for a leftist.

The guy even showed a little normalcy when he took a moderate position on identity politics speaking about his love for Chick-fil-A.

"I do not approve of their politics, but I kind of approve of their chicken," Buttigieg said on an interview with the Breakfast Club. "So maybe if nothing else, I can build that bridge. Maybe I’ll become in a position to broker that peace deal."

Pretty normal for a leftist.

But suddenly his self-righteous attitude toward Christians and Mike Pence in particular, was incredibly appalling. 

And it was based on BS.

The media has been moist over Buttigieg as a potential 2020 contender despite the fact he made the political screw-up of insulting voters by accusing Evangelical Christians of hypocrisy for supporting President Trump.

"It's something that really frustrates me because the hypocrisy is unbelievable," Buttigieg said on "Meet The Press." "Here you have somebody who not only acts in a way that is not consistent with anything that I hear in scripture in church."

Soon thereafter, Buttigieg, who is gay, gave a speech at the LGBTQ Victory Fund National Champagne Brunch in Washington where he called out "the Mike Pences of the world" for believing homosexual actions were sinful.

"If me being gay was a choice, it was a choice that was made far, far above my pay grade," Buttigieg said, implying G_d made the decision for him. “And that’s the thing I wish the Mike Pences of the world would understand. That if you got a problem with who I am, your problem is not with me ― your quarrel, Sir, is with my creator."

Except Mike Pence never had a problem with Buttigieg and the only times he spoke with him was to wish him well. The creep was using a straw man argument to make a BS point. See, Buttigieg is a white man and that's a negative in the small minds of the woke. 

But he's also a gay man, and that's points on his victimhood status, which is a positive in the small minds of the woke, so he's using it to get votes.

According to Michael Knowles of the Daily Wire, Buttigieg had to make the pivot and use his gayness as an issue because, according to Knowles, he has no choice but to play the victim card if he wants to stand out among the 2020 contenders.

"To stand a chance in 2020, the elite young mayor must somehow portray himself as an aggrieved victim," Knowles said. "That leaves Buttigieg only one option at the moment: to make his sexuality the central issue of his campaign, and to make his case in bad faith."

See, Democrats don't actually vote on national issues, they vote on intersectional victimhood status. 

Buttigieg is hardly a victim, however. He went to Harvard and Oxford Universities, and both of his parents are professors at the University of Notre Dame. 

To his credit, he served in the U.S. Navy Reserve as a Lieutenant and was deployed to Afghanistan in 2014.

But he's a liar and a purveyor of BS.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Wednesday, December 26, 2018

Hamas kills Christmas for Christians in Gaza

Like all good jihadis the Palestinian Hamassholes continue to make life miserable for Christians in Gaza living under their rule while their mortal enemy, Israel, continues to facilitate their right to religious freedom.

Islamic terrorists in the Gaza Strip have warned local Christians against celebrating their end-of-the-year holidays. In other words, celebrate at the risk of life and limb.

The Popular Resistance Committees, a name that sounds like a group college kids upset with a statue or some such nonsense is actually a coalition of armed Palestinian terror groups. They published a flyer just before the holidays featuring a burning Christmas tree and threats in Arabic forbidding the Christian celebrations, according to The Jerusalem Post.

The flyer from the Al-Nasser Salah al-Deen Brigades features a verse from the Quran, warning Muslims “not to go the way of the Jews and the Christians” because “indeed God is not for the evil people.”

But it seems that the Islamic concept of G_d is a being who went ahead and created a world majority of people he hates and has to have Muslims to oppress and kill them because he can't do it himself. I'd like to see Allah's resume.

The terror organization cautioned that it is “absolutely forbidden” to celebrate the holidays in any capacity, and The Jerusalem Post cited a Gaza government source as saying that the flyer was aimed at both Muslims and Christians living in Gaza.

The eternally angry Hamas, the Islamic terror group that rules the Strip, has in previous years issued notices to restaurants and hotels, banning establishments from throwing New Year’s Eve celebrations because they weren't invited and they eat like slobs.

Before the eternally angry Hamas terrorists took over Gaza in 2007, the Christian population was just over 3,000. Today, only 1,000 Christians remain, most of them Orthodox.

Christians and their property have occasionally come under attack since Hamas seized power.

While the Christian population is shrinking under Palestinian rule, it is steadily growing in Israel, the only country in the Middle East that safeguards Christians and enables them to practice their faith freely and safely.

Israeli authorities have worked to facilitate Palestinian celebrations, easing security restrictions in honor of the season’s holidays. But it never goes the other way.

Please share this with your contacts and visit the ads on this page. 

Have a safe, Happy New Year celebration!

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Bake the Cake but Don't Eat Chick-fil-A

Twitter Cowardly Executive Orifice (CEO) Jack Dorsey chickened out over Chick-fil-A after virtue signalers on the left told him he was wrong to eat at the Christian-owned franchise due to their religious views on gay marriage.

Now even food has become political. How stupid.

Dorsey [no relation to novelist Tim Dorsey, thankfully] tweeted a photo of a purchase he made at Chick-fil-A using a mobile application.

After liberal 'better-than-thou' twits bashed Dorsey for eating at an establishment whose ownership follows the precepts of Christianity and does not acknowledge the legitimacy of same-sex marriage, the chicken-poop CEO folded and apologized for removing the hand up his butt that controls his actions.

The left hand is once again up high into his nether regions.

The "biblical definition of a family," as Chief Executive Officer (the other CEO) Dan Cathy said in 2012, is between one man and one woman.

The Certainly Not News (CNN) network's Soledad O'Brien was among the most prominent idiots to call out Dorsey for having the audacity to not make every aspect of his life into a political statement. She indicated that Dorsey "sinned" publicly by eating at the Christian-owned franchise.

"You're right," Dorsey said in a meek, mouse-like tone. "Completely forgot about their background."

Ironically, in 2012 at an event, O'Brien had Chick-fil-A as her sponsor.

What a putz!

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Canada: Former mayoral candidate charged with hate for criticizing Christianity

Photo: Global News
Ontario, Canada -- A former Mississauga mayoral candidate Mohammed Mahmoud Muhamed, 45, whose online posts targeting Christians prompted complaints, was arrested for "hate-motivated crime," Peel Regional Police said.

Muhamed was charged with a single count of willful promotion of hatred following what a statement called "a lengthy investigation into numerous incidents reported to police."

The Democracy Can Go To Hell Report website where Muhamed posts his radio-host style videos, many of which are aimed at the Christian faith, particularly the Amish, remained online after the arrest.

The last episode, which broke his camel's back so to speak, was a rant he made about the disgusting behavior of the Amish regarding 'sparking,' a practice many Muslims want to ban but are afraid of the consequences they might have heaped upon them by angry Amishists.

Amish terror in Canada is clearly on the rise, eh.

The devout Muslim man was charged under a section that outlaws the promotion of "hatred against any identifiable group" other than in private conversation and determine by any individual who feels 'unsafe' and cannot find his or her 'safe space.'

If convicted, Muhamed (who likes to be called "Mohammad" with an 'a') faces up to two years imprisonment if convicted.

The charge was approved by the Ontario Attorney General's office, which has the final say as to how they feel about hate crimes prosecutions. Muhamed is scheduled to appear in Brampton court on Monday and Christians, particularly Amish, have been holding vigils near the courthouse.

"This charge is long overdue," said John Smith, executive director of the National Council of Canadian Christians. "We welcome this development as an important step towards safeguarding our communities from unchecked hatred that both harms social cohesion and threatens the safety of community members, especially the Amish ones.
The future problem?

Muhamed couldn't be reached for comment but a recorded message on his phone merely mentioned that his Twitter and YouTube accounts have been suspended.

In recent months, Muhamed has become known for his remarks about Christians, particularly in his opposition to weekly Christian prayers in Peel district schools. In fact, Muhamed first offered a reward of $1,000 and then $2,500 for a recording of "hate speech" during or after "The Lord's Prayer."

"Today the Christian community of Peel can sleep safer knowing that there are consequences for promoting hatred and inciting violence against us," Father John Bishop said. "We hope that these charges will serve to deter future Islamic assaults on our community."

For the real story, as opposed to this satirical piece, click here.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Madeleine Albright, Trump's secret weapon

Former Secretary of State under Bill Clinton (but not in "that way") Madeleine Albright just may be President Donald Trump's secret weapon.

Ms. Albright has threatened to "register as Muslim" over Trump's immigration policies but we know that he doesn't really plan to register Muslims in the first place, but this supposed plan is made up by the media to stir up opposition to Trump's real policies.

But what if Albright really does become a full-blown Muslim? Wouldn't that discourage young men who may have thought of converting to Islam from pulling the trigger, so to speak? Is this the reward extremists will get from self-detonation? 

Is she the typical "virgin?" 

Trump never said that he plans to register Muslims--that's fake news--this is important to remember.

But Albright threatens to 'register' as a Muslim, as does Mayim Bialik, the actress on "The Big Bang Theory. Bialik is Jewish and Albright discovered later in life that she too has a Jewish background.

Neither Albright nor Bialik (who holds a PhD in something) seem to realize that as Jews or Christians (in Albright's case) they are described as apes and pigs in Islamic scripture and are hated.

To get a better picture of just how barbaric the religion of peace can be toward Christians and Jews, click here

What is wrong with Trump holding off for 120 days before we begin "extreme vetting" of people coming from countries that are known for breeding and harboring terrorists?

The only thing I would say that Trump is overlooking is that there are countries not on the list for which he wants to temporarily freeze visas and immigration. These countries include Saudi Arabia, the hub of the extreme Wahhabism that encourages violent jihad; as well as Lebanon, Jordan, Bangladesh and Pakistan. 

Ironically, all of these countries are primarily Islamic. But where Christians and other non Muslims are being persecuted and killed, Trump should make it easier for those people to gain refugee status.

In the meantime, Albright and Bialik need to remove their heads from their nether regions and acknowledge the disregard to democracy, law and order and human rights that Europe has caused to befall itself by opening its borders to poorly vetted refugees who often enough, wish them harm.

Bialik is just a stupid person with a lot of education, while Albright is more sinister.

Albright favored war with Saddam Hussein and was trying to find an excuse to start that war. In his book, Gen. Hugh Shelton (ret) then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave an account in his memoirs of an exchange had with Albright. He describes a disgusting conversation they had where she states:
"I know I shouldn't even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event--something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough--and slow enough--so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?"
Shelton writes: The hair on the back of my neck bristled, my teeth clenched, and my fists tightened. I was so mad I was about to explode. I looked across the table, thinking about the pilot in the U-2 and responded, "Of course we can . . . " which prompted a big smile . . .
"You can?" was the excited reply. 
"Why, of course we can," I countered. "Just as soon as we get your ass qualified to fly it, I will have it flown just as low and slow as you want to go." 
This is the way liberals think. Let someone else do it. Let someone else pay for it. Let someone else defend me.



Sunday, January 22, 2017

Germany rejects "almost all" asylum applications from Christians

It isn't as if Germany is doing anything the United States wouldn't do--or didn't do under Barack Obama. 

Just like we admitted thousands of Muslim refugees and only a couple of Christians, German Chancellor Angela Merkel's government is doing the same social engineering than actual humanitarian relief. She wants to "fundamentally transform" German society by bringing in a refugee contingency among whom are covert Islamic extremists and Sharia supremacists, and she is doing it in droves. 

One can say that Merkel has blood on her hands from jihadi attacks like the one in Berlin on December 19th last year killing 12 and injuring dozens more. 

But the really disturbing fact is that Germany is rejecting "almost all" applications for asylum of Christian refugees and this is the one group that is most victimized in the world right now.

Christian refugees thought the found a safe refuge when they fled their homelands and arrived in Germany, but what they learned was that their hopes for asylum are being "hijacked" in "kangaroo" courts as they face deportation back to the horrors that drove them out of their countries in the first place, explained Dr. Gottfried Martens.

Martens is pastor at Trinity Lutheran Church in Berlin and he revealed that the German government is rejecting almost all applications for asylum from most of his church's Afghan and Iranian refugee congregation. 

They have waited years for the government to hear their cases but many are now receiving deportation notices. So while Merkel, like Obama, pretends to be a humanitarian, she is not showing it toward Christians.

Pastor Martens said that if migrants can show that they would face persecution if sent home to a Muslim country, it increases their chances of staying. They can do this by simply proving they are Christian or have converted to Christianity. 

But the problem with this is that the Muslim translators are "hijacking" their asylum applications by deliberately misquoting them during their "kangaroo court" asylum hearings, making it look as if their conversion was fake. This then leads to an application rejection and subsequent deportation. 

Taqiyya . . . Google it.

Martens explained how Christian migrants are harassed and often violently attacked in refugee shelters. This is especially true for Muslim converts to Christianity. The Koran tells Muslims to kill apostates.



Monday, January 16, 2017

Glasgow church service uses Koran reading


Scotland is doomed. 

When passages from the Quran that explicitly refutes the divinity of Jesus is read in Arabic from the lectern during an Epiphany service in a Scottish cathedral, a service which celebrates the arrival of three kings bearing witness to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, something is terribly wrong.

To have the passages from Islamic scripture read as part of the service is obscene to religious Christians, particularly those that clearly reject the divinity of Jesus at a ceremony during a festival that Christians believe marks the revelation of Christ's divinity to the world.

The church has since receive over 10,000 messages from angry Christians outraged by this outrageous occurrence. 

"Christians should know what their fellow citizens believe and this can include reading the Quran for themselves, whether in the original or in translation," the Right Rev. Michael Nazir Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester told the BBC regarding the reading. "This is not, however, the same thing as having it read in church in the context of public worship. The authorities of the Scottish Episcopal Church should immediately repudiate this ill-advised invitation and exercise appropriate discipline for those involved."

If it had been a mosque, instead of a Christian church, and Allah or Muhammad were rejected by a reading therein, heads would roll.

The dhimmie who organized the event, the Not Very Rev. Kelvin  Holdsworth, said they received so many threatening messages that they were forced to call the police. [Better them than the Taliban.]

Holdsworth hit back saying the church had been involved in a number of different interfaith events in the past and that Quran readings have been conducted at the church in the past without incident. But he didn't say which verses were read and by whom.

Holdsworth also did not say whether he would attempt to get his church to do a reading of the Bible at a local mosque, but spreading the word of the Bible doesn't appear to be a big priority for the dhimmie.

He then went on to use the Muslim Brotherhood invented term 'Islamophobic,' and blame the 'far-right media' for the problem.

Since Christianity has been around longer than Islam (although Muslims lie and say that Islam has always existed, but it was just practiced the wrong way until Mohammed came around) it should be Muslims who get to hear the Not So Very Rev. Holdsworth preach to them.

Somehow, I don't see that ever going to happen. 



Tuesday, December 27, 2016

"No Nazi Trump voters allowed"

It's strange--if you're a Christian baker and feel that it goes against your beliefs to cater a gay wedding, you can be forced to do so. Thus you do not have freedom of association.

But if you're a liberal cafe owner in Honolulu, no problem. Be as intolerant as you like.

The Honolulu Cafe has a bright yellow sign that tells potential customers they cannot eat at the establishment if they voted for Donald Trump. The color of the sign is totally appropriate.

The sign says: "If you voted for Trump you cannot eat here! No Nazis."

The sign is posted on the cafe's Facebook page and has received at least 40 "likes."

One FB person wrote: " . . . The next time you're in Honolulu, eat lunch here, not only are they on the right side of things, the food is delicious and reasonable."

Being on the "right side of things" in politics is strictly a matter opinion. You can hate Trump for what he said about women so many years ago in a "locker room talk" type situation. Or you can hate Clinton for her lies about Benghazi and her illegal private server which compromised national security.

It's up to you to decide which is worse, and overall, Americans across the nation decided on Trump.

One person commented on the sign in an email saying: "It's childish and very unprofessional . . . "The restaurant owner doesn't have to worry . . . I will not be stepping foot in that establishment."

Another said it was in "extreme poor taste."

And it is, if you believe that calling everyone who voted for Trump a Nazi. That's disgusting to conflate what the Nazis did to people who merely thought Trump would actually be better for the country than Clinton, whose likability was in the tank. But then again, she called Trump voters "deplorables," so what's the difference?
Not a Trump voter

Why is it okay for liberals to force religious conservatives to provide services that go against their beliefs, but not for liberals to have to do the same?

Willes Lee, the former chairman of the Hawaii Republican Party and current president of National Federation of Republican Assemblies, told FoxNews.com the sign is discriminatory and harkens back to "racist and hate-filled" days before statehood.

"Remember when Filipinos couldn't go in certain places, or Japanese wouldn't be allowed [in] many homes? And, it didn't matter who they voted for," Lee said, who is of Japanese descent.

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser said the cafe was founded by Robert Warner, a former hair stylist along with his wife Jali, who downplayed the "ban."

Jali told FoxNews.com that the cafe isn't asking customers if they voted for Trump, and claimed that even if they see a customer with a Trump shirt, "we don't put anything different [in] your food." 

Jali refused to say whether this meant that they spit in everyone's food, just in case they voted for Trump.

Everything has become political. Everything. And it's getting disgusting--even the holidays bring political arguments to the table.

Some customers say that while Jali is soft-spoken, Warner is known to channel the "soup Nazi" persona of New York City Seinfeld fame. " . . . throwing pots and pans," "telling off customers," and "hanging not-so-friendly reminders on butcher paper for his customers to read."

One Yelp reviewer took issue with the sign and wrote: "It was funny on Seinfeld, but this place can rot away. Stay away. Hawaii ain't like this. There's a lot of better places on the island than to have to deal with extra crap like this."

But the hypocrisy is palpable--liberals would be suing the cafe if Clinton's name was substituted for Trump on the sign.


Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Another possible Islamist attack in Australia

A van loaded with gas bottles crashed into the Australian Christian Lobby office in Canberra on Wednesday and then exploded.

No staff members were hurt but the condition of the driver is unknown Lyle Shelton, Lobby manager, tweeted. Along with Shelton's tweet was an image of the burnt out vehicle and he called it a "car bomb."

The blast was powerful enough to destroy several building windows and damaged an extensive amount of property.

The van headed toward the front of the building, a police spokesperson confirmed. 

Of course, no determination as to whether the event was intentional or accidental was made, but it's a Christian building, it's almost Christmas, the van was packed with gas and the incident comes only hours after another minivan drove into a farmers market in Beijing and few days after a Christmas market in Berlin was attacked by a jihadist with a truck.

No screams of "Allahu Akbar" were heard, but that doesn't mean they weren't screamed.

"There are no public safety issues and ACT are seeking any witnesses to the incident," the spokesperson said.

Please have a safe and happy Christmas and Hanukkah. 


Thursday, December 8, 2016

Muslims protest Christian governor in Jakarta for "insulting" a book

Jakarta -- Thousands of angry intolerant members of the religion of peace flooded the streets of Jakarta Friday. They are calling for the arrest of the city's ethnic-Chinese Christian governor Basuki Tjahaja "Ahok" Purnama. They are claiming he insulted a book.

Meanwhile, there are others who are demanding that Purnama also apologize to a rock that he cursed at after stubbing his toe.

Seriously--they say Purnama didn't like a book or something and they want him to be "dealt with."

More than 150,000 crazed Muslims are set to take part in the "Off With His Head" protest but that's a very conservative figure, which may go as high as 350,000. This demonstration may break the all-time Jakarta demonstration since the ones preceding the end of the Suharto regime in 1998. They are planning to have about 20,000 security personnel on hand as a safeguard for probably violence and terrorism.

An Islamic group demanded the arrest of the governor because, they say, he insulted the Koran, an Islamic book written by a man named Mohammed, who claimed to be a prophet and invented the religion that's making a big splash across the world and is not dissimilar to the "Roach Motel" where you can come in, but you can't get out--at least in once piece.

The demonstrators marched toward the National Monument in central Jakarta and conducted Islamic "prayers" there. The government isn't calling the demonstration a demonstration (with the accent on 'demon') but are instead calling it a "mass prayer."

An earlier "mass prayer" calling for Purnama's arrest was held in early November and turned predictably violent (as is often the way angry Islamic gatherings are wont to do). One of the faithful was killed and 350 people were injured including security personnel. 

Purnama is Jakarta's first Christian governor since the 1960s and the first of Chinese ancestry. He was deputy governor to Joko Widodo for two years and replaced him as governor when Widodo became president in 2014.

Purnama fought hard against corruption and worked to ease Jakarta's traffic problems. He has taken a tough stance on squatters, which has hurt his approval ratings as does his being Christian, which often hurts Christians in Muslim countries.

The governor is presently on leave as he prepares for the upcoming election in February.

Let's hope that cooler heads prevail in Jakarta and that Purnama is allowed to keep his on his shoulders.



Thursday, December 1, 2016

School district bans Santa Claus et al

As a way to show respect to all religions, an Oregon school district has moved to ban all religions from receiving their respect. That is, all religious-themed decorations, Christian and Jewish, have been banned during the Christian and Jewish holidays.

This brilliant politically correct decision was revealed Tuesday and bans decorations with images such as that powerfully Biblical figure from the New Testament, Santa Claus. Oh, wait--that's not right--Santa isn't a religious figure anymore than a pine tree with lights is a religious monument.

The brilliant notice to staff regarding the ban read: 
"You may still decorate your door or office if you like, but we ask that you be respectful and sensitive to the diverse perspectives and beliefs of our community and refrain from using religious-themed decorations or images like Santa Claus."
Thankfully, the school district still allows one group of students to pray several times a day in rooms provided along with prayer mats. 

Ironically, it is rumored that it is the parents of these students who are grossly offended by religious objects--especially Jewish objects.


Friday, November 18, 2016

Translator reveals Muslim hate and how they want to "Islamize" Germany

A 39-year-old female translator originally from Eritrea came to Germany in 1991 as a refugee herself. She eventually volunteered at refugee asylum centers to "give something back." She claims that Muslim migrants hate Christians and want to Islamize Germany.

The Arabic-speaking translator said that what she discovered over the past five years working with migrants shocked her after hearing Muslim refugees preaching "pure hatred" of Christians.

She said that Muslim kids are ordered by their parents not to play with Christian kids, and she was told by a refugee that it is a sin for her to help feed and defend Christians.

The translator told German Catholic website Kath.net that "They want Germany to be Islamized. They despise our country and our values." She explained that many of the migrants showed their "true colors" when only around other Muslims. "Pure hatred against non-believers is preached, and children are brought here from an early age here in Germany.

"It's very similar in asylum housing, where Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians.

"Some woman told me, 'We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it's the only way we can destroy them here.'"

The translator also said that other translators were part of the problem because they prevented Christian refugees from claiming permanent asylum because they never told them they were entitled to have their questionnaires translated.

Anyone who is surprised by this situation in Germany just isn't paying attention to what's going on in the world. The goal of Islam is total globalization in the form of a world caliphate where the only religion is Islam in order for there to be peace.

Thank you, Angela Merkel.

Friday, September 2, 2016

The score: Muslims 10,745, all others 56

Barack Hussein Obama reached his goal of admitting 10,000 Syrian refugees into the United States this year. In fact, the total number of refugees was 10,801. Of these, 17 are Yazidis and 41 are Christians. 

Christians comprise 0.5% of a population that makes up 10% of Syria's religions. 

Of the non-Muslim refugees, 56 were religiously oppressed in Syria (unlike Colin Kaepernick's definition of the word).

But the irony is, the reason for the oppression of Christians and Yazidis is due to their religion, and the oppressors are Muslims who are religiously commanded to oppress them. It's how Islam rolls.

There is absolutely no doubt that not enough is being done for Christians in the Middle East. They are being killed or banished by their Islamic neighbors and the West is doing nothing to stop the carnage or the oppression.

Since the civil war began in 2011, about 500,000 to 1 million Christians fled Syria and many have been specifically targeted and slaughtered by the Islamic State. Secretary of State John Kerry doesn't want the media to talk about terrorism, but there we go again, doing just that.

In March, Kerry said the U.S. had determined that ISIS has committed genocide against minority religious groups, including Christians and Yazidis, as instructed in the Koran. Of course, Kerry never mentioned the Koran, but I thought someone should.

"In my judgment, Daesh is responsible for genocide against groups in territory under its control, including Yazidiz, Christians and Shia Muslims," the intellectually challenged and follicle-gifted Kerry said. 

He likes to call the Islamic State 'Daesh.' It makes him feel intelligent, like when he doesn't crash on his bicycle, or when he remembers to say, "Please pass the Heinz."

Kerry accused ISIS of "crimes against humanity" and "ethnic cleansing," but the administration does nothing more than provide lip-service to the problem while infidels are dying across the globe.

In spite of Kerry's mentioning Christians and Yazidis, hardly anything has been done to bring these minorities to the U.S. as refugees. A State Department flunkee said that religion was only one of many factors used to determine a refugee's eligibility for entry into the country.

So in order to determine eligibility, the Department of Homeland Security  talks about a person's need to escape their home country for reasons of safety and freedom, etc. If any group of people deserve refugee status, according to DHS, it's Christians, Yazidis and other minorities in Syria. Those are the people in the most danger.

This administration is pretending that religion isn't a primary factor, but it is the primary reason that non-Muslims are being forced out of their homes. To turn a blind eye to this problem is to act as if Islam in the Middle East is tolerant of infidels.

Sadly, the total opposite is true and the facts prove it. In a 2014 article in Jihad Watch which admittedly is outdated, the changes in Muslim vs. Christian populations are discussed. The situation has worsened since then for Christians, but the article is insightful.



Friday, June 3, 2016

Mut'a Marriages by ISIS = rape

An Iraqi Christian woman told how ISIS fighters 'married' her over and over so they could rape her--or have sanctioned Islamic sex with her. It's called a  mut'a marriage and it is as Islamic as Halal jerked chicken.

The woman, who escaped from ISIS in Mosul says that she was "married and divorced" as many as nine times a night so that her captors could have 'justified' sex with her--according to the religion of peace.

In the hadith and other early Islamic balderdash, the word 'mut'a' is the preferred Shi'a term for temporary marriage because the Koran refers to this kind of marriage and uses a term derived from the same root word. And while the act of mut'a rape (which this is) is usually ascribed to the Shi'ites, the Sunnis, like ISIS, also use it to justify their behavior.

Fox News and other media have reported on it as the woman testified to the nonprofit group In Defense of Christians (IDC). They almost appeared to have disbelief that a so-called religion would allow such a horrible atrocity to be part of its practice. 


That's because even conservative news outlets don't want to believe that ISIS is following Islamic scripture with complete orthodoxy. 

That's what's wrong with our society. 

Donald Trump may turn out to be a terrible president, but he's not the danger to the USA that Hillary Clinton screeches he is--Islamic jihad with the goal of establishing a world caliphate is the danger and we had better wake up before we don't wake up.


IDF seizes huge Iran terror axis arsenal but the fingerprints on them are damning

Israel’s capture of a vast arsenal from Iran’s terror proxies reveals an axis with the most unexpected originsAmong the weapons taken from H...