Mohammed Hijab declares bankruptcy after legal loss to Douglas Murray and The Spectator

In August 2025, Mohammed Hijab (his real name is Mohammed Hegab but he evidently wanted to show his Muslima feminine side), a prominent Islamic influencer and debater, lost a high-profile defamation lawsuit he brought against Douglas Murray and The Spectator magazine.

The case stemmed from a 2022 article by Murray that linked Hijab to inflammatory rhetoric during the Leicester riots (involving tensions between Muslim and Hindu communities). The High Court ruled in favor of Murray and The Spectator, finding the article "substantially true" and determining that Hijab had "lied on significant issues" in court, rendering his evidence "worthless."

Can you say "taqiyya" guys?  

His appeal was later rejected by the Court of Appeal in October 2025. 

As the losing party, Hijab was ordered to pay the defendants' legal costs, with estimates circulating around £670,000 to £850,000 (including his own fees and the awarded costs). On or around January 23, 2026, Douglas Murray publicly stated on X that Hijab had declared himself bankrupt following the failed case. Douglas was kind enough not to add that Hijab is mentally bankrupt as well.

This situation has been widely discussed and shared across X, with multiple posts referencing the bankruptcy filing as a direct consequence of the massive legal bill. Hijab has responded on X in threads (including quoting hadiths about spiritual "bankruptcy" on Judgment Day and questioning the enforceability of payments post-bankruptcy), but he has not denied the declaration itself.

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, and check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free.

This development has drawn significant attention, mockery from critics, and commentary on the risks of unsuccessful libel actions in the UK (where losers like Hijab typically pay costs). 

Bankruptcy in such cases can limit immediate enforcement of debts but does not erase all obligations, and assets may still be pursued by an insolvency practitioner. 

The story highlights broader issues around free speech, press freedom, and the high costs of defamation litigation in the UK.

Tweet

Hamas says they'll accept exile of leaders and stop smuggling of weapons: yeah, sure

The grim farce of Middle Eastern geopolitics lurches on, and now we are told that Hamas, that paragon of moral decrepitude, is flirting with a ceasefire proposal in Gaza. I trust them as much as I trust gas station sushi.

According to the Saudi outlet Asharq, the terrorist group, ever adept at cloaking its barbarism in pragmatism, has signaled a willingness to bend on two of Israel’s three non-negotiable demands: disarmament and the exile of its leadership. One might be forgiven for raising an eyebrow at this apparent outbreak of reasonableness from an organization whose raison d’être is the annihilation of the Jewish state and Jews across the globe.

Let us dissect this with the skepticism it deserves. 

Hamas, we are told, is prepared to offer “guarantees” to halt arms smuggling, shutter its weapon production sites, cease its obsessive tunneling, and, most risibly, store its weapons, as though they were mere heirlooms to be mothballed. This, we are meant to believe, constitutes a de-facto demilitarization. A charming notion, but one that assumes Hamas, an outfit steeped in blood and betrayal, can be trusted to honor such pledges. Based on its history, one would have to be a complete dolt to think this is going to work in the long run.

The group is also reportedly open to the “symbolic and temporary exile” [aka make believe exile] of a handful of its senior figures, a gesture as hollow as it sounds. 

Israel, quite sensibly, has demanded the permanent removal of Hamas’s leadership from Gaza as a condition for ending the war. Yet the details of who might be exiled, and for how long, remain conveniently vague. One suspects this is less a concession than a performance, as usual.

President Donald Trump said on Thursday that Hamas’s response to the latest ceasefire proposal could arrive “within 24 hours.” He claims to want “safety for the people of Gaza” and has been leaning on both Israel and Hamas, via Qatar and other mediators, to strike a deal. 

One wonders if Trump’s optimism is born of naivety or calculation, for the notion that Hamas, whose charter drips with genocidal intent, cares a fiddler's fart for the safety of Gazans is as credible as a fairy tale. 

The three Israeli conditions are clear: an end to Hamas’s rule in Gaza, its disarmament, and the exile of its key leaders. Full compliance, as Asharq notes, “appears unlikely,” yet the reported flexibility on disarmament and exile is being spun as a “potential shift in stance.” The shift is merely a means of survival, one might believe.

Further details only deepen the cynicism. Hamas, we are told, may agree to stop its terrorists from parading about in uniforms, as though this sartorial restraint signals a retreat from their martial ambitions. Meanwhile, their internal enforcement unit, the so-called “Arrow Unit” (Sahem), is gearing up for a post-ceasefire purge. They have issued warnings that, once a truce is declared, they will unleash retribution on “traitors,” a category that conveniently includes drug dealers, informants, and anyone else they deem insufficiently loyal. The unit reportedly has lists of names. 

This is not the behavior of a group preparing for peace; it is the reflex of a mafia statelet girding itself for control.

On the security front, Israeli intelligence points to Az al-Din Haddad, a figure close to the late and sinister Yahya Sinwar, as the new operational head of Hamas in Gaza. Egypt and Qatar, those tireless mediators, reportedly see Hamas as the only viable policing force during a transitional phase, an admission that reveals the paucity of options in a region where governance is often a synonym for thuggery. 

The ceasefire proposal itself is a staged affair: Hamas would release roughly half of the living hostages and half of the remains of deceased captives over five phases spanning 60 days. If “serious talks” on ending the war are underway, the U.S. may offer guarantees to prevent a return to hostilities. One might ask what such guarantees are worth when dealing with an entity that regards truces as tactical pauses.

Israeli officials close to Prime Minister Netanyahu describe him as “very eager” for a deal, viewing the current diplomatic climate as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity.” Maybe, but eagerness must not be mistaken for gullibility. [Taqiyya much?]

Hamas’s history is a litany of broken promises and blood-soaked opportunism. To believe they are now ready to abandon their arms or their grip on power is to indulge in a fantasy that defies both reason and experience. The people of Gaza, caught between Hamas’s fanaticism and Israel’s resolve, deserve better than this charade of diplomacy. Yet here we are, parsing the nuances of a terrorist group’s “flexibility,” as though it were a legitimate government negotiating in good faith. The tragedy is not just in the bloodshed, but in the lies we tell ourselves to make sense of it.

Hey amazing readers! If you love the content you find here please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

Communist NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani Unmasked on 'Meet the Press'

Grok 3 defines the term intifada as: 

"The term "intifada" is an Arabic word meaning "uprising" or "shaking off." It is most commonly associated with Palestinian resistance movements against Israeli occupation.   First Intifada (1987–1993): A grassroots uprising in the occupied Palestinian territories, characterized by protests, civil disobedience, and violence, including stone-throwing and clashes with Israeli forces. It led to the Oslo Accords.
Second Intifada (2000–2005): A more violent uprising triggered by Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa Mosque. It involved suicide bombings, armed attacks, and Israeli military responses, resulting in significant casualties on both sides.The term can also be used more broadly to describe other popular uprisings or revolts in different contexts, but it is most often tied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

The American Jewish Committee defines the term "Globalize the intifada" as:

“. . . a phrase used by pro-Palestinian activists that calls for aggressive resistance against Israel and those who support Israel. The most prominent expressions of intifada have been through violence so this phrase is often understood by those saying and hearing it as encouraging violence against Israelis, Jews, and institutions supporting Israel. While the intent of the person saying this phrase may be different, the impact on the Jewish community remains the same."

A proponent of the intifada, Zohran Mamdani, is running for New York City mayor on the Democratic ticket, although he is clearly a communist. The word 'communist' is still taboo in most of American society, so like Bernie Sanders, AOC, and many others in the Democratic Party, he calls himself a Democratic Socialist.

Zohran Mamdani is handing Republicans a golden ticket on a silver platter. As James Carville, the grizzled Democrat strategist, recently put it, Mamdani’s campaign has been “a gift to Republicans,” and now that he’s clinched the primary, that gift just keeps on giving. The guy has establishment Dems in New York sweating bullets, and it’s not hard to see why. 

Mamdani’s anti-Semitic baggage is piling up faster than garbage during a New York City sanitation strike. Heavyweights like Senate Minority Leader Chuck 'Nostrils' Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries aren’t exactly tripping over themselves to slap their names on his campaign posters. Why? Because Republicans are having a field day painting Mamdani as the new face of the Democrat Party, and he’s making it way too easy for them.

Mamdani’s Pro-Hamas Problem

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: Mamdani’s stance on the Israel-Hamas war. Calling him pro-Hamas is like calling the Hudson River wet. 

Since the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians, Mamdani’s been cozying up to the “globalize the intifada!” mobs that keep popping up in NYC like roaches in a dive bar. His rhetoric screams one thing loud and clear: he’s not just sympathizing with the cause, he’s all in. Now that he’s got the primary in the bag, Mamdani’s got a new problem: convincing New York City’s sizable Jewish and pro-Israel voter base that he’s not the radical they think he is. Good luck with that, pal. 

His performance on Meet the Press this past Sunday, where he was grilled three times about the phrase “globalize the intifada,” was a masterclass in taqiyya, but ended in him weaving, and stepping on rakes. 

Taqiyya is an Islamic term referring to the practice of precautionary dissimulation or concealment of one's true beliefs, particularly in times of danger or persecution, to protect oneself or the Muslim community. Rooted in Islamic jurisprudence, it is primarily associated with Shia Islam but is also recognized in some Sunni contexts. The concept originates from Quranic verses (e.g., Surah Al-Imran 3:28) and hadiths that permit hiding faith to avoid harm, such as during oppression or threats to life.In practice, taqiyya allows a Muslim to outwardly deny their faith or act contrary to Islamic principles if their life, safety, or community is at risk, while inwardly maintaining their beliefs. Historically, it was used by minority Muslim groups, especially Shia, under hostile rule. The scope and permissibility of taqiyya vary across Islamic schools of thought, with some limiting it to extreme circumstances and others allowing broader use for communal benefit. Misconceptions often portray taqiyya as deceit for malicious purposes, but in Islamic tradition, it is a defensive mechanism, not a tool for deception in everyday affairs.

Here’s how it went down with moderator Kristen Welker, and trust me, it’s not just what Mamdani said, it’s what he didn’t say that’s got people’s jaws on the floor:

KRISTEN WELKER: I want to ask you about an issue that has divided some New Yorkers in recent weeks. You were recently asked about the term “globalize the intifada,” if it makes you uncomfortable. In that moment you did not condemn the phrase. Now, just so folks understand, it’s a phrase that many people hear as a call to violence against Jews. There’s been a lot of attention on this issue, so I want to give you an opportunity to respond here and now. Do you condemn that phrase “globalize the intifada?

ZOHRAN MAMDANI: That’s not language that I use. The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights. And ultimately, that’s what is the foundation of so much of my politics, the belief that freedom and justice and safety are things that, to have meaning, have to be applied to all people, and that includes Israelis and Palestinians as well. Swing and a miss, strike one.

Here’s strike two when he was pressed by Welker:

ZOHRAN MAMDANI: I’ve heard from many Jewish New Yorkers who have shared their concerns with me, especially in light of the horrific attacks that we saw in Washington, D.C. and in Boulder, Colorado about this moment of anti-Semitism in our country and in our city. And I’ve heard those fears and I’ve had those conversations. And ultimately, they are part and parcel of why, in my campaign, I’ve put forward a commitment to increase funding for anti-hate crime programming by 800%. I don’t believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech in the manner, especially of that of Donald Trump, who has put one New Yorker in jail, who’s just returned to his family, Mahmoud Khalil, for that very supposed crime of speech. Ultimately, what I think I need to show is the ability to not only talk about something but to tackle it and to make clear that there’s no room for anti-Semitism in this city. And we have to root out that bigotry, and ultimately we do that through the actions. And that is the mayor I will be, one that protects Jewish New Yorkers and lives up to that commitment through the work that I do. [In the famous words of Greta Thunberg: blah, blah, blah.]

And here’s the hat-trick of non-answers:

ZOHRAN MAMDANI: My concern is to start to walk down the line of language and making clear what language I believe is permissible or impermissible takes me into a place similar to that of the president, who is looking to do those very kinds of things, putting people in jail for writing an op-ed. Putting them in jail for protesting. Ultimately, it’s not language that I use. It’s language I understand there are concerns about. And what I will do is showcase my vision for this city through my words and my actions.

Three Strikes, You’re Out!

Three chances to condemn an anti-Semitic battle cry, and Mamdani whiffed every single one. Why? Because, as Avi Mayer pointed out in a June 29, 2025, X post, “He won’t condemn it because he’s led marches galvanized by it. This is who he is.” Dang, that’s the kind of truth bomb that leaves a mark.

Before the primary, Mamdani was out here spinning “intifada” as some noble “struggle” for Palestinian rights, not the call for Jewish annihilation it’s been understood as for decades. [See above explanation of the term 'globalize the intifada.] Now that he’s got the nomination locked up, he’s pivoted to this mealy-mouthed “that’s not language I use” nonsense. Why the switch? Easy. The primary’s over, and he’s trying to play moderate for the general election. But you don’t get to march with the “intifada” crowd and then act like you’re just a humble advocate for “universal human rights.” 

The Speech-Policing Sleight of Hand

Here’s where Mamdani really steps in s**t. He tries to dodge the “globalize the intifada” question by crying “speech policing” and dragging Donald Trump into the mix, slickly implying that condemning hate speech against Jews is somehow akin to throwing people in jail for writing op-eds. 

That’s not just a dodge, it’s a deliberate misdirection, and it’s as transparent as Kanya's feelings about Jews.

He is trying to paint himself as a free-speech martyr while conveniently ignoring his own track record. Mamdani’s got no problem calling out what he sees as anti-LGBTQ or anti-Palestinian “hate speech.” He’s been vocal about “bigotry” against transgender folks and his allies in the Israel-Hamas debate. But when it comes to chants that many interpret as calling for violence against Jews? Crickets. 

Apparently, his “speech policing” principles kick in only when it’s Jewish safety on the line, not when it’s his own pet causes. That’s not a principle—it’s a preference, and it’s a damning one.

Mamdani’s handed his rivals, leftist holdovers like Cuomo and Adams, a playbook thicker than a Katz's Delicatessen sandwich. If they don’t spend every waking minute from now to Election Day hammering him on this, they’re basically begging to lose. This isn’t just a political fumble; it’s a full-on interception returned for a touchdown. Mamdani’s refusal to condemn “globalize the intifada” isn’t just a bad look, it’s a billboard screaming “unelectable” in neon lights.

Let's just hope they keep running on it.

Hey amazing readers! Love the content you find here? Your support keeps this blog thriving! A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

Hezbollah now rebuilding miilitary and financial resources back merely a week after ceasefire

Hezbolah has already begun getting back to its roots as they rebuild their military and financial capabilities in order to kill the, you know, the Jews! It's only a week since the ceasefire with Israel went into effect after 13 and a half months of war, as the New York Post reports.

While the Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) attacks from the air and on the ground have significantly harmed Hezbollah's setup and fighters, U.S. intelligence suggests that the group has begun to recruit new members, increase its own weapons manufacturing, and seek ways to keep smuggling weapons through Syria.

Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing a senior U.S. official, an Israeli official, and two U.S. lawmakers who were informed about the intelligence.

Under the terms of the ceasefire agreement on November 27, Hezbollah is not allowed to rearm.

According to U.S. assessments, Hezbollah lost over half of its weapons and thousands of fighters during the conflict with Israel. Despite these losses, it hasn't been completely wiped out. The sources mentioned that Hezbollah still possesses thousands of short-range rockets and plans to rebuild by using weapon manufacturing facilities in nearby countries, with routes leading into Lebanon.

One of the lawmakers told Reuters, "Hezbollah has been 'temporarily weakened' and its command-and-control capabilities diminished." However, the lawmaker added, "This organization is built to withstand disruption."

Washington is especially worried about what's happening in Syria, where groups of terrorists backed by Turkey have recently attacked in Aleppo and Hama, posing a big challenge to the Assad government, which is supported by Iran and Russia. Israel keeps hitting Hezbollah's smuggling paths in Syria and along the Syrian-Lebanon border to stop Iranian weapons from getting through.

A high-ranking U.S. official disclosed that the U.S. is pushing Syrian President Bashar Assad to limit Hezbollah's actions, with help from other countries in the region. Reuters mentioned earlier this week that the U.S. and the United Arab Emirates talked about possibly removing sanctions on Assad's government, but only if he stops the flow of weapons to Hezbollah, among other conditions.

Hezbollah officials claim they will keep up their "resistance" against Israel [aka those Jews, Christians,  and Arabs]. However, sources in Lebanon suggest that right now, Hezbollah's main effort is on rebuilding and fixing homes that were damaged by Israeli airstrikes in Southern Lebanon and Beirut.

Regarding Hezbollah's financial situation, Saudi-owned, London-based pan-Arab newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat reported that the terror group has begun assessing repairs to its financial arm, Al-Qard al-Hassan, which was heavily damaged by Israeli attacks during the war.

The Iranian-supported group is planning to give housing grants through a bank to help fix the homes of families affected by the war. Each family could get $12,000 to cover rent and repairs.

Even after a major Israeli air strike on October 21, the bank managed to restart its services just one week after the ceasefire began.

A Saudi newspaper noted that "the bank starting up again shows that Israeli reports of its destruction were not true." But, someone close to Hezbollah revealed that the group experienced big financial hits during the war. This insider also said that the money for rebuilding wouldn't come from Al-Qard al-Hassan, but from new funds Iran sent to Hezbollah.

On the first day of the ceasefire, Iran sent $1 billion through a local middleman, which Hezbollah intends to use for recovery projects.

So is anyone surprised that Hezbollah constantly lies to their enemies? It's known as taqiyya in Islamic scripture--lying for the sake of Islam, and mostly associated with Shia Islam. It allows for deception or dissimulation under certain circumstances and Hezbollah seems to make taqiyya-supporting circumstances up as they are needed.

Sneaky is as sneaky does.

Tweet

Hamas and Al Jazeera walk back claims of sexual assault by IDF

The Qatari mouthpiece Al Jazeera had run a story claiming that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) was raping Palestinian women, but has since deleted that page. This act of rape, which Hamas did and admitted to doing to Israelis on October 7, was allegedly done during the IDF's fight against Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists who had barricaded themselves inside the terror headquarters, formerly known as the Shifa Hospital, in Gaza. 

Al Jazeera [aka "The Toilet Paper"] deleted the story after it had run for a day, but they have not admitted to the retraction.

Al Jazeera propagandist and former director Yasser Abuhilalah also tweeted, admitting that “It was revealed through Hamas investigations that the story of the rape of women in Al-Shifaa hospital was fabricated… The woman who spoke about rape justified her exaggeration and incorrect talk by saying that the goal was to arouse the nation’s fervor and brotherhood,” adding critically that “As if more than thirty thousand martyrs, ninety thousand wounded, about a million displaced people, and comprehensive destruction were not enough!”

Jihad Khelles, a pro-Hamas preacher from Gaza whose parents had no imagination when it came to naming him, also tweeted that it became evident that there was no proven evidence for the events and that the ‘witness’ told a story that she had heard and not witnessed, also adding that “this creates panic and fear” and “makes [Palestinians] feel despair and frustration at a time when we are most in need for stability and reassurance.”

The Toilet Paper HQ

At least they're admitting the claim was balderdash and could prove embarrassing to the outlet.

The original story published by Al Jazeera featured a “testimony” by Jamila Al-Hessi, a Gazan woman who claimed that while she was under siege in the area of the hospital complex, she witnessed IDF soldiers “raping women then killing them and burning entire families alive.”

Al-Hessi was a liar but she did it for the sake of taqiyya. Her lies went viral, causing many to rage against Israel and what they said was the Arab failure to protect the honor of Palestinian women even asking where Hamas and the resistance had gone. 

However, Israeli news blogger and Middle East expert Abu Ali Express also reported that the viral fake testimony also had unexpected reverse ripple effects, leading many Gazans to flee their homes in the northern Gaza strip southwards, which may explain the unusual event of a Hamas investigation into the details.

It turns out Al-Hessi, in a live interview on Al-Jazeera, admitted she wasn't even at the Shifa hospital.

She also claimed that they had been calling for aid for six days, adding, “who is the Red Cross? Are they Jews, our enemies?” also accusing the organization sees itself as “more than us [Gazans]” and wondering how come they have food and water, but the Gazan citizens don't.

The Qatari royal family founded Al Jazeera, [aka The Toilet Paper] which has serves as a mouthpiece for the regime and provides lavish asylum for the leaders of the terrorist Hamassholes.

The regime's Arabic-speaking language outlet is known for spreading anti-Semitic rhetoric and holocaust denial, as well as operating a Western-facing outlet, AJ+, which reportedly propagates divisive and inflammatory content while flouting registration under the FARA act for several years.

Al Gore (D) and former Vice President, co-founded Current TV, which was eventually sold to Al Jazeera. Gore reportedly made a substantial profit from the sale and is beheading-proof for now.

Tweet

IDF kills group of terrorists crossing border from Lebanon: is Hezbollah joining Hamas?

Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) shot and killed a group of terrorist gunmen who tried to infiltrate Israel through the shared border on Monday.

The number of gunmen in the group was not released by the IDF, and Hezbollah denied the scumbags were theirs, possibly a claim known in Islam as taqiyya, or lying for the sake of defending Islam. They instead claimed the terrorists were part of the Al-Quds Brigades, a military terrorist wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad,

Some, like myself, believe that Hezbollah was involved with this group who are situated to the north of Israel. But if Hezbollah [and therefore Lebanon] was involved, Israel will respond with shock and awe and Hezbollah knows this.

Meanwhile, US President Joe Biden, who is barely sentient, is reportedly trying to negotiate with Hamas but it's too late for making nice to these immoral and disgusting pieces of human excrement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is clear that this is not going to happen. You don't kidnap, murder, rape and mutilate innocent civilians and think that Israel is going to now call for peace. 

Of course there will always be anti-Semites who will not even consider Jewish babies, much less adults, innocent, because to them, all Jews must die. 

What Hamas committed was totally reminiscent of what the Nazis did, and anyone who throws around the word 'Nazi' simply for the purpose of an insult, is ignorant of what they did and now what Hamas has done.

The IDF is maintaining a heavy presence along the northern border as a warning against further aggression.

And speaking of Hezbollah, on Sunday they fired a dozen rockets into Israel to "send a message," according to Hashim Safieddine, a Hezbollah scumbag.

It's time for Israel to reply to that message with a response so hard, their dead ancestors will feel it.

Never again.

Tweet

ISIS wannabe bagged but now wants leniency

Dayton, OH -- An Ohio wannabe terrorist who tried to join ISIS simply to behead, shoot and immolate infidels is asking for leniency, "you'll never regret it," he claims.

U.S. District Court Judge Walter Rice will decide on this case and if he falls for this crap he'll be putting the lives of innocent infidels in real danger.

“I just want to ask you for mercy and leniency for me. … you will never regret it.”

I disagree. If he is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, it still wouldn't be enough to match the punishment to the attempted crime.

And it would be “Islamophobic” to bring up Muhammad’s formal pronouncement that “war is deceit” (Bukhari 4.52.268) in this context.

The wannabe terrorist, Laith W. Alebbini, 28, readily admits that he agrees with the Islamic State’s agenda, although he claims to reject its violence. Alebbini has almost certainly heard that [taqiyya] saying of Muhammad.

The Dayton Daily News, March 9, 2019 [my comments in brackets] reported:

A Dayton man convicted of conspiracy and attempting to fly overseas to join ISIS said a federal judge would “never regret” giving him a sentencing break. 

Laith W. Alebbini, 28, told U.S. District Court Judge Walter Rice on Friday afternoon what motivated him to try to get to Syria was to see if ISIS was the right group to join to fight the Bashar al-Assad regime. [He saw the video of ISIS terrorists burning the Jordanian pilot to death in a cage and he figured, "Hey, I can do that."]

“Maybe I was confused, but my intent was to be part of the solution,” Alebbini said, [meaning something akin to the final solution, but not just with Jews, Christians and other infidels too]. “I just want to ask you for mercy and leniency for me. … you will never regret it.” 

Addressing the court during a sentencing hearing, Alebbini disputed prosecutors’ characterizations of his thinking and said he admires the United States and hopes for a United States of Arabia. ["Just don't kill me, please. You won't be sorry. I'll do anything, anything to make it up to you."]

Alebbini said many Islamic groups like ISIS favor that ideology.

“I would never kill innocent people because of that,” he said. “I agree with the agenda but disagree with the violence.”… [Those who don't believe in Allah and Muhammed as his prophet, and who are not Sunni Muslims, are not innocent in the eyes of ISIS terrorists, and therefore must be killed.] 

Alebbini’s federal public defender Thomas Anderson has advocated for a sentence of time served (nearly two years) and denounced the 30- to 40-year range he said has been proposed by pretrial services and prosecutors…. [I agree with Anderson about the 30- to 40-year sentence. He should get life without parole.]

A cousin who grew up with Alebbini in Jordan testified by telephone from Canada. Mohammad Ababneh said Alebbini was “all talk” and “incapable” of violence. Alebbini has no criminal history. [Read more about taqiyya. And let's remember, there's a first time for every terrorist's beheading of an infidel.]

Ababneh said Alebbini had been depressed over being unemployed, was smoking marijuana regularly and felt like a “major disappointment” to their family…. [Yeah, whenever I'm down on my luck and feeling blue, I smoke a joint and kill a Jew--hey it rhymes.]

I believe there should be no easy consequences for people who join a terrorist organization. It isn't as if the wannabe terrorist is clueless about the atrocities they commit. Had this scumcrumpet not gotten caught, he would have likely engaged in the same atrocities "to make a difference in the world."


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

More arrests made in gutsy statue mugging

Two additional socialists were arrested Wednesday for destroying a century-old statue of a Confederate soldier in Durham, North Carolina. 

Dante Strobino and Ngoc Loan Tran were arrested as they stupidly attended a court hearing for another socialist-anarchist woman who was charged Tuesday for climbing a ladder and attaching a rope to the bronze statue, in a move reminiscent of ISIS destroying Christian statues.

The Durham County Sheriff's office said the two were charged with two felonies related to inciting and participating in a riot that damaged property.

The ladder-climbing woman, Takiyah Thompson, was charged with the same counts the previous day. 

Fun Fact: Takiyah, usually spelled 'Taqiyya' means to lie in the service of Islam.

Thompson is a student at North Carolina Central University, allegedly majoring in lesbian dance theory.

All three anarchists belong to the Workers World Party, a communist party in the United States founded in 1959 and led by Sam Marcy of the Socialist Workers Party. The group helped organize the Durham protest in response to the deadly violence in Charlottesville, Va. over the weekend.

Thompson allegedly climbed up and attached a rope to the statue and her colleague commies pulled it down.

After the statue fell, protesters thought it safe to kick the Confederate soldier while he was down. Some spit at it, others flipped him "the bird."

"I'm tired of white supremacy keeping its foot on my neck and the necks of people who look like me," Thompson said at a news conference. "That statue glorifies the conditions that oppressed people live in, and it had to go."

Yes, the anarchists are tired of waiting for lawful change--blame it on faster internet and leftist attention deficit disorder.

Insofar as white supremacists putting their feet on the necks of people like Thompson, there has never been a time in the United States, with more opportunities in education and employment than now. 

The number of neo-nazis and white supremacists in the U.S. is relatively quite low, however, it seems that the number is on the rise. On the other side we have the alt left, Antifa and other forms of mental illness.

The Durham anarchy event was in response to a white supremacist rally held in Charlottesville, Va. over the weekend, which led to three deaths. While Charlottesville sparked new debate by government officials over removing symbols of the Confederacy and slavery around the South, the state of North Carolina has a 2015 law protecting their monuments--not that it made any difference to the actual law enforcement officials who sat on their hands while the statue of a Confederate soldier was being pulled down. The law prevents removing such monuments on public property without permission from state officials.


Durham County Sheriff Mike Andrews said Tuesday that his deputies got off their butts and are now working on finding out who was involved in the incident that they could have prevented by upholding the 2015 law. The department plans to pursue felony charges against those perpetrators.

Late Tuesday, NC Gov. Roy Cooper suddenly realized after all his years on the planet, that the remaining Confederate monuments on state property ought to be removed and directed officials to study the cost and logistics of moving them to historical sites or museums. He also tallied up the likely number of votes, both plus and minus, such a move would render him come next election.

"We cannot continue to glorify a war against the United States of America in the defense of slavery," Cooper said in a statement. "These monuments should come down."

So where this epiphany come from, Gov?

It's all politics. Everything has become politics. Everything has become us against them.

Sad!


Tweet

Where in hell is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?

It's been three years since the head scumcrumpet of the wannabe caliphate, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, gave his sermon at the Great Mosque of al-Nuri in Mosul. He had just captured the city and declared it a "caliphate."

When sl-Baghdadi captured Mosul, he controlled a region about the size of the UK. But now the Muslim jihadists are retreating, killing women and children among others as they run away, and al-Baghdadi is nowhere to be found.

Since the three years have come and gone, ISIS no longer controls very much area and the bloody bast**d is not to be found. And the dude has a $25 million bounty on his beard.

There are rumors that Baghdadi is dead. In fact, Russia's deputy foreign minister said it was "highly likely" that Baghdadi was killed in a Russian air force strike on Raqqa on May 28th. Last week, an Iranian official was emphatic that he was "definitely dead."

But the U.S. isn't buying it yet. 

A video from Raqqa a week after the Russian report came out, ISIS jihadis referred to "our sheikh" without mentioning Baghdadi by name. This gives one pause as to the accuracy of the Russian claim. However, it could also be a taqiyya ploy--a lie to further the Islamic agenda.

The Taliban and al-Qaeda hid the death of Taliban leader Mullah Omar (pronounced "Tahleebahn" by Barack Hussein Obama, and he should know) for two years.

Hopefully, Islamic State is hiding the death of the POS Baghdadi.

Tweet

big surprise--the Palestinian Authority lied

While in Washington Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas assured President Trump the PA had stopped funding terrorism. That's called 'taqiyya,' or a lie for the sake of Islam. 

However, during their meeting in Bethlehem, Trump demonstrated he had evidence provided by Israel, that the Abbas government was still sponsoring terrorism, big league.

One of the main issues President Trump demanded of the PA was for them to stop funding terrorism. They said they would--taqiyya kicked in--they lied.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson testified on Tuesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and said the PA is no longer rewarding terrorist acts by paying terrorists and their families when they go all to pieces over their work. "They have changed that policy and their intent is to cease the payments to the families of those who have committed murder or violence against others," Tillerson said. "We have been very clear with them that this is simply not acceptable to us."

I blogged about this several days ago and didn't quite believe Abbas then--for more on that click here.

Another major demand Trump made was for the PA to totally stop the incitement of violence and glorification of acts of terror and martyrdom. 

Israel says the PA continues to promote violence against the Jews. In fact, there has been an increase in anti-Israel propaganda and recruitment for further acts of terror.

The official Israeli response: "Israel does not recognize any change in Palestinian policy that continues to pay the families of terrorists. The Palestinian Authority continues to praise, incite and encourage terrorism through payments.

But Israel is doing something about it. According to the Camp David Accords, all products coming in to the PA come in via Israeli ports, at which time they're taxed and Israel hands over the money to the PA.

Israel will now calculate how much the PA pays to reward terror and will then subtract that amount from the taxes they collect and give the remainder to the PA.

As it now stands, the Times of Israel calculated the PA has paid out $1.2 billion to terrorists and their families over the last four years. One of the highest-paying positions in the PA went to a terrorist and there's even a ministry dedicated to paying terrorists called the Ministry of Prisoners' Affairs. It deals with terrorist prisoners in Israeli jails and the families of terrorists.

Issa Karaka, the Palestinian minister of Prisoners' Affairs, said that calling for the stopping of these payments was an act of war. [LOL-as if the PA hasn't been waging war with Israel all this time].

"The Palestinian society is made up entirely of families of prisoners and shahids, and they are all victims because of the Israeli occupation," he said, directing his words against the U.S.

"This demand to stop payments for prisoners' families," Karaka continued, "is no small matter, but something very big with social ramifications. No one in the Palestinian Authority could make such a move. It would be very difficult for the Palestinian Authority to stop the humanitarian aid to the families of prisoners and shahids."

A shahid is a "holy martyr." 

Why is it that so many Muslims who say they're killing Jews for Allah are perverting Islam when it's advocated in the Quran?




Tweet

Anti-Zionist Sarsour to spew her bile at CUNY if Cuomo allows it

The pro-Israel group Zionist Organization of America's president Morton Klein wrote a letter to far left New York Governor Andrew Cuomo urging him to rescind an invitation to have Muslim "civil rights" anti-Semite Linda Sarsour spew her hatred of Israel and Jews at a City University of New York (CUNY) commencement ceremony.

The letter by Klein correctly refers to Sarsour, the keynote speaker at the CUNY Grad School for Public Health graduation ceremony on June 1st, as "a bigot and divider." He said that she is an "extremist" who supports the "anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

"Sarsour claims to care about bigotry--except when it is directed against Jews," Klein told Cuomo. He also cited Sarsour's social media postings including a tweet that said "nothing is creepier than Zionism."

In a taqiyya-laden statement (lying for the advancement of Islam) CUNY School of Public Health Dean Ayman El-Mohandes (aka Al Lou Akbar) defended Sarsour's selection saying that she opposes all discrimination, including anti-Semitism.

Yeah, some of her 'best friends are Jewish.' 

One of Sarsour's tweets (written on 3/8/11) about anti-Sharia speakers Brigitte Gabriel and Ayaan Hirsi Ali said: 

"Brigitte Gabriel= Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She's asking 4 an a$$ whippin.' I wish I could take their vaginas away--they don't deserve to be women." 

Sarsour has always had a pro-Sharia (Islamic law) view. On September 22, 2011 she tweeted:

"Sharia law is reasonable and once u read into the details it makes a lot of sense. People just know the basics."

On May 12, 2015:

"If you are still paying interest than [sic] Sharia Law hasn't taken over America. #justsaying."

Sarsour pushes the "Islamophobia" myth like the Democrats pushing abortion. She even  claimed that "Muslim kids" are being "executed" in the United States and pushed leftist Mayor of New York City, Bill de Blasio, to end legal and necessary surveillance in Muslim communities in there.

This vicious purveyor of hate gets praise and a platform from CUNY while true pro-freedom speakers get brutalized, shouted down if they're even allowed to speak (which is rare) and often just canceled from appearing by the leftist authorities on campus.

I believe Sarsour should have the right to speak, but to make her a keynote speaker is objectionable on many levels. I guess if you call yourself a liberal, university leaders will fawn all over you.



Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the right margin.

Tweet

Iran: "We will not ask the West: 'Infidels, may I'"

Screen grab: Fox News

Iran's President Hassan Rouhani, in a defiant message to President Trump, said that Iran will seek "no one's permission" to build missiles. 

He then went on to say that "The strengthening of the capability of the Iranian armed forces . . . is only for defending the country and we will ask no one's permission to build up the armed forces, and to build missiles and aircraft." 

This is what is known as 'taqiyya' or 'religious deception' in the language of Islam. It is the systematic lying to the infidel and should be considered an integral part of Islamic tactics. A good example is the statement that "Islam is a religion of peace."

The actual root meaning of the word 'taqiyya' is:  to remain faithful, but in effect means "dissimulation." Quranic authority (3:28 and 16:106) allows Muslims to conform outwardly to the demands of non-Islamic government, while internally "remaining faithful" to whatever the Muslim conceives to be proper Islam as he waits for Muslims to gain in strength and are able to fight the infidel. 

Even Mohammad said "War is deceit;"  Rouhani knows this. In fact, taqiyya has its origins in Shi'a Islam, although it's practiced by non-Shi'a too.

Rouhani added that Iran never had "aggressive aims, but peace is not a one-way road and if we decide to be peaceful the other party . . . may not. So there is a need for vigilance."

When Rouhani retires, he could get a job on a farm as a manure spreader.

Chants of "Death to America!" "Death to Israel!" are not a road to peace. But when the Twelfth Imam (aka Muslim messiah; aka Imam Zaman) returns, there will be peace, Shi'a Muslims believe.

An article in the Daily Caller (March 16) by Reza Kahlili, says that a leading Iranian ayatollah, [Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani] stated that the "Islamic messiah 'will behead Western leaders.'"

Iran's leaders want to speed up the return of Imam Zaman so that in the end of times, there will be peace in the world.

Of course there will be--no life .  .  .  no sounds .  .  .  just peace.

Credit: Time Magazine

On a happier note, Rouhani is facing reelection and needs to show the voters that he's willing to go up against the West because of the criticism he received saying he was too willing to appease the world after the Tehran deal to curb nuclear power in exchange for lifting economic sanctions.

On a less happier note, the man running against him is likely to be Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a Holocaust denier and staunch hater of Christians, Israel, Jews, the U.S., the West, gays, lesbians and puppies.


Tweet

Imam debunks Michigan man's claim that travel ban killed his mom

Dearborn, MI -- A Muslim man who claimed his mother died due to President Trump's travel ban that prevented her from returning to the US for medical treatment was merely using taqiyya (i.e., lying) to the media, according to the imam of a local mosque.

Mike (possibly an Americanization for Mohammad) Hager told TV stations in Boston and Detroit he tried to bring his mother back from Iraq last Friday but she wasn't allowed to enter the U.S. because of the Trump travel order restricting entry from seven countries known for spawning terrorists.

He also told Fox2: "Since I lost my mom I've been on heavy medication--I can't even sleep. I did not make anything up."

The last part should have been the clue that he was lying.

But Imam Husham Al-Hussainy said that Hager's mother actually died January 22nd, five days before the travel restrictions went into effect. The imam told the news station prayers for the woman at the Karbalaa Islamic Foundation Center in Dearborn.

So it looks like "Mike" won't be getting compensated for his anti-depressants or be able to sue Trump for the travel ban that he said killed his mom.

In fact, Hager posted on Facebook a memorial statement for his mother on January 22nd which he since deleted.

Al-Hussainy said he first learned that the woman died after members of his mosque and family's Facebook posts. A funeral was held for the woman at a nearby mosque last weekend.

Hager's claim was that he was a U.S. citizen but his mother and other family members who traveled to Iraq were not. The others were not allowed to return, he claimed.

How disgusting of anyone who would use the death of a parent to further a geopolitical and religious cause.

But it's comforting to know that there are imams and other Muslims who are patriotic.

Tweet

Fake News: Muslim girl lies about being pushed onto tracks

Vienna, Austria -- Birthplace of Dr. Sigmund Freud, an appropriate place for this crazy story to take place. But perhaps it isn't as crazy as it seems, for it seems that these kinds of lies are fodder for the Islamic propaganda gristmill. 

A 14-year-old Muslim girl (let's call her Ayisha as that was the prophet's 6-year-old wife's name) has created an outrage on social media. She claimed that a bystander pushed her onto the railway tracks yelling "terrorist" at her.

According to her story, she was saved by another bystander who pulled her back onto the platform "at the last second," and ran off to the hospital. Her Turkish native parents filed a criminal complaint stating she was assaulted.

Naturally, the social media went berserk. Without any evidence, an anti-discrimination and racism group immediately went political and blamed Austrian Foreign and Integration Minister Sebastian Kurz for the attack. It was his fault because he said on Friday that he wanted to ban public servants, including teachers, from wearing the hijab or Islamic headscarf.

The proposed ban caused discontent as it was stricter than even France's laws where only the full anti-Muslim-rape cloth full-body armor is banned, better known as the burqa. 

But now the girl is being accused of lying. Investigators couldn't find a shred of evidence of the alleged assault after combing through CCTV at the time and place the alleged incident occurred at the S-Bahn train station.

Police spokeswoman Irina Steirer said: 

"We have looked through the CCTV and at the time when the incident is alleged to have occurred, nothing can be seen on the records . . . Both the alleged victim and the accused are captured on CCTV, but nothing ever happens and they are both simply getting on the train."

The girl will be brought in for questioning "as soon as possible," and she could be charged with slander and filing a false report.

She should have just made a fake bomb for "Show and Tell." Who knows, maybe she could get to meet the President of Austria.


Tweet

Germany rejects "almost all" asylum applications from Christians

It isn't as if Germany is doing anything the United States wouldn't do--or didn't do under Barack Obama. 

Just like we admitted thousands of Muslim refugees and only a couple of Christians, German Chancellor Angela Merkel's government is doing the same social engineering than actual humanitarian relief. She wants to "fundamentally transform" German society by bringing in a refugee contingency among whom are covert Islamic extremists and Sharia supremacists, and she is doing it in droves. 

One can say that Merkel has blood on her hands from jihadi attacks like the one in Berlin on December 19th last year killing 12 and injuring dozens more. 

But the really disturbing fact is that Germany is rejecting "almost all" applications for asylum of Christian refugees and this is the one group that is most victimized in the world right now.

Christian refugees thought the found a safe refuge when they fled their homelands and arrived in Germany, but what they learned was that their hopes for asylum are being "hijacked" in "kangaroo" courts as they face deportation back to the horrors that drove them out of their countries in the first place, explained Dr. Gottfried Martens.

Martens is pastor at Trinity Lutheran Church in Berlin and he revealed that the German government is rejecting almost all applications for asylum from most of his church's Afghan and Iranian refugee congregation. 

They have waited years for the government to hear their cases but many are now receiving deportation notices. So while Merkel, like Obama, pretends to be a humanitarian, she is not showing it toward Christians.

Pastor Martens said that if migrants can show that they would face persecution if sent home to a Muslim country, it increases their chances of staying. They can do this by simply proving they are Christian or have converted to Christianity. 

But the problem with this is that the Muslim translators are "hijacking" their asylum applications by deliberately misquoting them during their "kangaroo court" asylum hearings, making it look as if their conversion was fake. This then leads to an application rejection and subsequent deportation. 

Taqiyya . . . Google it.

Martens explained how Christian migrants are harassed and often violently attacked in refugee shelters. This is especially true for Muslim converts to Christianity. The Koran tells Muslims to kill apostates.



Tweet

ISIS flag okay in Sweden

In Sweden, it's perfectly okay to fly the Islamic State flag and it isn't considered an incitement to racial (read 'religious') hatred, according to a Swedish cretin who happens to be a lawyer.

A 23-year-old Laholm man, a Syrian refugee and a fan of ISIS, avoided prosecution after allegedly posting a photo of himself with the flag of the Islamic State and used it as his Facebook profile photo. 

The photo was reported to authorities in March and the Muslim man was investigated for incitement of racial hatred (which is always confusing in that Islam is not a race, it's obviously a religion which makes it an ideology). 

The man denied the charges which is known in jihadist circles as "taqiyya." Google it.

He said he isn't a supporter of ISIS and claimed the flag has been used as an Islamic symbol for hundreds of years and then abused by ISIS, his defense attorney Bjorn Nilsson told Swedish newspaper Hallandsposten.

The prosecutor Gisela Sjovall decided not to prosecute, saying the issue was whether the ISIS flag could be considered a hate symbol, such as the Nazi swastika could be considered an incitement to racial hatred.

Ms. Sjovall said waving an ISIS flag cannot be considered hate speech (perhaps because flags by themselves cannot speak). She said that waving the ISIS flag "is not an expression of disrespect towards any ethnic group" because ISIS is "against everyone except those who belong to ISIS."

So it's okay, according to Sjovall to hate all ethnic groups as long as you don't single out one. Makes perfect sense.

The ISIS flag is also used by al-Shabaab in Somalia and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. It's also used by other terrorist groups. In other words, it isn't unique to ISIS, it's unique to jihad groups.

Ironically, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg would be the first in line to be beheaded by any jihadist group when the caliphate comes to town, because the religion of Islam is anti-Semitic according to its scripture.  It also doesn't work and play well with Christians, gays, lesbians, atheists, and other religions.

It's time to stop their propaganda on social media and stop them completely from killing the innocent "non-believers."

Tweet

Orthodox Muslim convicted of war crimes in Timbuktu

The Hague, Netherlands -- Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi (aka "Al") is an orthodox Muslim who was found guilty of a war crime by overseeing the destruction of historic mausoleums in the Malian desert city of Timbuktu. The man with the not-so winning smile and Little Orphan Annie hair, was sentenced to only nine years in prison where he will be provided with a glove-handled Koran, prayer mat, Halal food and soccer pitch.

Ahmad, a former teacher, pled guilty and expressed remorse for his role in overseeing the destruction of nine mausoleums and a mosque door by ax-wielding rebels in June and July of 2012.

His trial began this August and was a landmark for the International Criminal Court since its establishment in 2002 and the first conviction for destruction of religious buildings and historic monuments. It was the first guilty verdict delivered against a Muslim extremist.

Al Qaeda-linked rebels occupied Saharan city of Timbuktu in 2012 and enforced a literal interpretation of sharia law which included destruction of idols, or in this case, the mud-brick tombs they considered idolatrous. Al Mahdi (his friends call him "Mad Al") was the leader of one of the "morality brigades" (which is perhaps the sickest oxymoron ever) set up by the new rulers of Timbuktu.

Wearing a plain gray suit and striped purple tie (the color most preferred by schizophrenics) Ahmad remained silent after the verdict and sentencing was given. Earlier in the trial, the Islamist urged Muslims around the world not to do what he had done. This is what Islam refers to as taqiyya, or lying for the promotion of Islam. He said of these acts that "They are not going to lead to any good for humanity."

Al Mahdi faced up to 30 years in prison for destroying the World Heritage-listed sites, but the presiding judge Raul Pangalangan bought into the taqiyya bull and claimed that many factors argued for a lesser sentence, such as Mahdi's apparently sincere admission of guilt.

I wonder how Raul would feel if Al Mahdi planned to live next door to him after he's free. Kind of like how Obama would feel if he had to live next door to illegal immigrants, I bet.


Tweet

Clock Boy sues: money for nothing

Mohamed X2, (aka Mohamed Mohamed) father of Ahmed Mohamed, aka "Clock Boy," aka "Clockmahd" sued Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro, Fox News and Glenn Beck for defamation among other things. In fact, I need to be careful he doesn't sue me for my freedom of speech, but the little diaper dump needs to find me first.

Back on September 14, 2015, when the young Islamist was a mere 13-years-old, he brought a clock to school which he claimed he "built." That was a lie, but when you're Islamically inclined, you call it taqiyya and Allah will forgive you.

By the way, ever notice how it's generally okay to be satirical about Allah but never about Mohamed? They kill you for even drawing a playful cartoon of the pedophile.

Anyway, the clock looked a lot like an explosive device, kind of like it was planned to look and it scared school authorities enough to call him out of class and call the police.

It was found to be merely a clock, not a bomb. Clock Boy claimed he designed it himself, but it was later learned that he lied and got the clock from Radio Shack. He had no real skills other than lying. 

The police temporarily held the kid, worried that he had constructed a "hoax bomb," before releasing him. 

In spite of the lie, Clock Boy made a big stink with the help of his father Mohamed Mohamed (or Mohamed X2) and cried Islamophobia. Because it was about a Muslim person, it got Obama involved and he had the liar to the White House as his personal guest.

Now Mohamed X2 is suing multiple media companies and personalities for defamation and in order to make some easy money. 

Included in the suit as mentioned is Ben Shapiro. Ben appeared on Fox News' The Kelly File, where he said the entire incident was "a hoax, this was a setup and that President Obama fell for it because it confirms a couple of his pre-stated biases against police and against people who he perceives to be Islamophobic." He also added that Obama was "constantly shooting first and asking questions later" regarding the police, and that "the story didn't hold water from the beginning. Within the first forty-eight hours it was clear that this was a bit of a set-up and it was clear that the story didn't hold together."

Shapiro figured that Mohamed "literally took the guts out of an old clock, the wiring, and he put it inside of a pencil box and proceeded to bring that into the school and this is not the first family incident that has been like this. His sister had an incident in 2009 that was somewhat similar," he said, referring to a Breitbart News report that "the sister of the boy who brought a suspected hoax-bomb to his Texas high school said she was suspended from a school in a prior bomb scare.

The suit against Shapiro, Fox News and other commentators demands an apology. But the family also sued the city of Irving, Texas and the school district for about $15 million and apologies.

In a similar incident at the Sandy High, Oregon High School, a student named Levi Frunk was suspended and will miss playing in his homecoming football game, because he invented a homemade phone charger and used it in school. He was suspended for not being Muslim, but instead is Jewish. I'm not suggesting they suspended him because he is Jewish, but if he was Muslim, I have a suspicion the school would have let it slide.

Ironically, hate crimes against Jews is about 60% while it's about 11% for Muslims.

Ironically, Frunk didn't take a digital clock apart (like Ahmed admitted in an interview) he actually invented something. 

Unlike Ahmed with his checkered school record, Frunk had an exemplary record. He was at the top of his class, considered one of the brightest kids.

Frunk cooperated with school authorities and answered all their questions. Ahmed did not cooperate--he suddenly went mute.

But unlike Ahmed, Levi didn't get to meet with President Obama. 

What's wrong with this picture?

Tweet

Syrian rebels deny killing Hezbollah commander

Hezbollah said their head military commander, Mustafa Badreddine, was killed on May 12th in rebel "artillery shelling" at Damascus International Airport--you can read about the claim here and here. 

But an independent news organization that monitors the Syrian civil war said there was no artillery strikes against the airport at the time the claim was made and no rebel group claimed responsibility for killing the top scumcrumpet in Hezbollah's military. Thus, the probability was that Badreddine was killed in an Israeli airstrike.

So great is the hatred of the Jews by Islamists that they refused to give Israel the credit for blowing up the guy whose nom de guerre is Sayyed Zulfiker (aka Badreddine). Instead, they blame his "martyrdom" on Takfiri groups. 

To Hezbollah, 'Takfiri' means "not the right kind of Muslim."

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) called Hezbollah's claim false, claiming that they didn't observe any artillery attacks on the airport, and their sources embedded with the Syrian military as well as rebel groups, denied the shelling occurred at the airport.

Islamic Mujahideen have been known to tell lies, it's part of their Islamic war strategy and goes by the term "taqiyya."

SOHR's Facebook page read: "SOHR was informed by reliable sources in rebels in Eastern Ghouta and by sources in regime forces, that rebels didn't fire any single shells or rocket on the international airport of Damascus during the past few days, as no shells have been observed targeting the area by the SOHR."

"There is no truth about what have been published by Hezbollah about the assassination of its military commander in Syria "Mustafa Bader" (aka Master Bader) by rebel shells near the international airport of Damascus," SOHR concluded.

Hezbollah's response was to "unfriend" SOHR and make up vicious lies about the members. That is another Islamic strategy known as ad hominem attacks.

Since no rebel group bragged about killing Badreddine, and any rebel there would have loved to kill him, it's more likely the Israeli airstrike theory is correct. 

In any case, it's good riddance to the jihadist who had forty years of Hezbollah terrorism experience. He started out as an explosive expert and was responsible for the 1983 Marine Barracks Bombing in Beirut which killed 241 of my brother Marines.

The Israeli government and military aren't claiming credit for killing him--they just do their jobs and leave.

Badreddine was involved in planning military operations against the IDF in Lebanon from 1992 to 2010 when the IDF left. He killed 12 elite Israeli commandos from the Shayetet 13. The Israelis had good reason to kill the guy--I can imagine the smile on the pilot's face when learning what he accomplished.


Tweet