Gay man makes viral claim that he was set on fire in attack, but it looks like he was just blowing smoke

Allegedly attacks pregnant woman, pretends he was attacked by 2 men

In the spirit of another gay guy, Jussie Smollett, a man in San Diego claimed he was set on fire because he was gay, but now he is the one being portrayed as the instigator of what occurred, which started as an alleged assault of a pregnant woman. [Fun Fact: Only women can get pregnant.]

On Monday, Scotty Rowin, 39, told KGTV-TV he was assaulted days earlier while going for a walk.

In an interview, Rowin said a man in his 20s or 30s was one of two men yelling gay slurs, and that a liquid then was thrown on him, but they didn't have a hangman's noose nor shouted "this is MAGA country!" so the story isn't exactly the same as Smollett's.

“Immediately after that, I went up like coals on a barbecue. It started off really big,” Rowin claimed, adding that he used the “stop, drop, roll and a snap, snap, snap” technique to put out the flames.

“Just in survival mode. Just in the zone, I have to save my life,” he told KGTV.

HATE HOAX EXPOSED: #Antifa, leftists & media have been spreading claims that a gay San Diego man was set on fire by homophobes. Scott Rowin says he was called a fa—ot by two men before being set aflame in Hillcrest, San Diego’s gay neighborhood.@SanDiegoPD are investing & have… pic.twitter.com/XSdlV4lzvM

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo)

Rowin said he suffered second-degree burns, primarily on his side and back. He said he doesn’t know if he’ll need surgery but hopes the surgeon is cute.

“This is absolutely a hate crime. The slurs were hate-filled,” the gay fairy tale telller said, suggesting that whoever attacked him was looking for a victim.

“Nobody walks around with flammable liquid like without an agenda. In my opinion, they were obliviously out there targeting the LGBT community.

“This can still happen in 2023. There are still a lot of haters out there. I don’t want this to happen to anyone else.

“This time it was fire. What will it be next time?”

A Subway sandwich.

However, on Wednesday, the San Diego PD offered a bit more detail to the tale, saying that there is video evidence that shows Rowin assaulting a pregnant woman, according to KGTV.

Police said the assault took place just after 10:40 p.m. on June 12, the day Rowin claims he was attacked.

What a piece of crap. He seems to have used the story as an alibi for his assault.

“Officers were dispatched and arrived within minutes, but the suspect had already fled the scene,” police said, referring to the pregnant woman’s attacker.

The department said the woman was injured and bleeding when officers arrived. She was taken to a hospital for treatment.

Then came the report of the man being set on fire.

“Investigators determined that this man was the suspect who battered the woman from the earlier incident at 900 6th Avenue,” police said.

“Investigators have since determined the pregnant female was responsible for the burn injuries.”

Police said security footage shows the “initial physical assault by the man on the pregnant woman and the subsequent use of fire as a weapon by the pregnant woman on the man.”

Too bad she wasn't carrying something other than a child, if you get what I mean.

Scott Rowin needs to be charged with filing a false police report. And he should pay for the police resources used to investigate his claims.

— Fr0hickey (@fr0hickey) June 22, 2023

The department withheld further details.

“This is a complex investigation, and detectives are examining all aspects and allegations. The San Diego Police Department takes all crimes of violence extremely seriously. We recognize the community’s interest in this case and are working to balance transparency with protecting the active criminal investigations,” police said, according to KGTV.

No charges have been filed at this time.

Tweet

Shifty Adam Schiff censured by House for "false" allegations (i.e. lying) about Trump-Russia collusion

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to censure repulsive Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) for fostering lies that former President Trump's 2016 campaign colluded with Russia and told the public he had the facts on the case. Schiff is now the third House member to be censured since the turn of the century. 

In other words, he did not get fired, imprisoned, or made to apologize in public for what he had done to an innocent man, he simply got a finger-wagging because he is a member of the privileged class. [See also Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Eric Holder.]

The resolution for the finger-wagging passed 213-209 in a vote. While all GOP members voted in favor of the censure, six cowards abstained and voted "present" and every Democrat sided with the liar and voted against the resolution because they hate Trump and if they could get him with lies, then Schiff is their go-to guy.

This was the second time the House tried to censure Schiff, the first was when Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (FL) penned a resolution last week recommending a $16 million fine as well as a stern glance and wagging fingers, which was opposed by all Democrats and 20 Republicans who fear the same thing could happen to them.

Once money was out of the picture, the vote passed.

"As chair of the House Intelligence committee, Adam Schiff launched an all-out political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting U.S. president, at the expense of every single citizen in this country and the honor of the House of Representatives," Luna said prior to the vote. "With access to sensitive information unavailable to most members of Congress and certainly not accessible to the American people, Schiff abused his privileges, claiming to know the truth while leaving Americans in the dark about his web of lies… lies so severe that they altered the course of the country forever."

Schiff, along with his crazy eyes, spoke in his own defense. He arrogantly thanked the GOP for bringing the resolution for a vote once more saying, "To my Republican colleagues who introduced this resolution, I thank you. You honor me with your enmity you, you flatter me with this falsehood," Schiff said, lying about the fact that it was a falsehood. [He just cannot stop lying.]

"You, who are the authors of a big lie about the last election, must condemn the truth tellers," he said. "And I stand proudly before you. Your words tell me that I have been effective in the defense of our democracy, and I am grateful."

So Schiff implied the Russian collusion was not a hoax despite it being proved that it was. Sadly, there is no such thing as a double-censure, because if there was, Schiff would have made history. Democrats mistakenly think that making history is always a good thing--first black lesbian, incompetent White House Press SecretaryKarina Jean-Pierre is an example of that when she bragged about how she is an historical figure.

Schiff led Trump’s first impeachment proceeding, which was launched over a phone call made to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which he tried to leverage U.S. military aid in a bid to get him to announce an investigation of now-President Biden. Schiff would have sold his mother to get Trump impeached and imprisoned. Get Trump in front of a firing squad, and he would have even sold his wife for the deal.

Democrats tried to table the censure resolution on Wednesday but failed in a 218-208 vote along party lines.

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not mince words when she accused Republicans of doing Trump’s bidding and told them they looked "miserable" in the process. Someone recommended she buy a mirror.

Tweet

Trump's tax returns reveals a lot about the Democrats

The Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee loaded their guns and shot their load in the final days they remain in the majority to release six years of tax returns connected to former president Donald J. Trump. It turns out, their guns were loaded with blanks, unlike that of Alec Baldwin.

The committee Republicans condemned this unprecedented move because that's what they do in banana-republics, but the Democrats are as shameless as Whoopi Goldberg at a bar mitzvah.

Dick Neal (D-MA) the committee chairman put most of the blame on the IRS for failing to audit Trump enough when he was president. As hard as the Democrats tried to illegally leak Trump's tax returns [a felony] it took them this long to get their felonious-like wish granted and now the returns are public and this sets a terrible precedent which should, therefore, allow the public to see Joe and Hunter Biden's tax returns. All is fair in love and politics.

Regarding Trump's tax returns, according to expert auditors, his return is incredibly complicated, and that is totally understandable. But in order to show fraud, one needs a full audit, not a mere tax return and that doesn't even show net worth, just tax income or loss in a given year.

Ryan Ellis wrote in the National Review, "[T]ax returns are supposed to be secret, and revealed only voluntarily. Reading tax returns forcibly extracted from any taxpayer made me feel dirty, and a little sad for the integrity of the tax system going forward. But there is no smoking gun here, nothing that will finally “get Trump.” Nonetheless, below is a report of what I found."

Ellis then goes on to describe what he saw: dozens of individual ventures organized as its own LLC such as the "old Trump hotel in D.C., each Trump golf course, etc."

Other revelations show that Trump gave a lot of money to charity, [unlike Joe Biden]. He also loaned money to his children and they paid him back with interest that was rounded off. Terrible--he should go to prison for that and serve a life sentence, unlike Sam Bankman-Fried, who you might imagine will get a legal slap on the wrist because of his huge donations to the Democratic Party.

It turns out that Trump's tax returns easily adds up to over 1,000 pages of annual filed tax returns, not even including the LLCs.

But it's fake news to think that Trump was getting away with paying no taxes.

Ellis explains that from 2015 to 2020, Trump paid federal profit and "other" (e.g. self-employment, household employer, etc.) taxes every single year. In those years, Trump had a cumulative "total tax" of $4.4 million, ranging from $285 thousand in 2017 to a high of $2.1 million in 2018. The best indicator of tax liability, Ellis says, is the "total tax" line, which accounts for federal income tax and "all the things that proxy for federal income tax on a 1040.

Suffice it to say that Trump did not do anything anyone else in a similar situation would not do. Ellis describes him as a man who likes to create new ventures, perhaps make a profit, and then move on to another venture.

To the utter dismay of the Democrats, his returns were not fraudulent. Trump, over the years, created myriad businesses, some of which had lost money, cancelling out those that made profit. The tax burdens all fall upon the shoulders of the business owner. If you think Trump should pay more, than you must also think that a person's business losses should offset his business profits, and that is totally unfair.

So, like the "fine people" hoax and the "drink bleach" hoax, this entire exercise by the party of the jackass was another total fake news hoax.

Tweet

BREAKING: 11 Sets of Documents Removed from Mar-A-Lago by Feds: some marked "Top Secret"

Photo: Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Federal law enforcement agents removed eleven sets of documents from former President Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago residence in Florida over the week.

The Wall Street Journal reported that some of the materials removed were “marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities.”  This report was also confirmed by Fox News and said the warrant gave permission to search “the ‘45 Office,’ all storage rooms, and all other rooms or areas within the premises used or available to be used by POTUS and his staff and in which boxes or documents could be stored, including all structures or buildings on the estate.”

Four sets of top secret documents were recovered along with three sets of secret documents and three sets of confidential documents, according to the report. Around 20 boxes of items were removed from the property and U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland approved the search warrant and continues to suck both at his job and as an individual.

“Just now the Justice Department has filed a motion in the southern district of Florida to unseal a search warrant and property receipt relating to a court-approved search that the F.B.I. conducted earlier this week” at Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago, Garland said. “The department filed the motion to make public the warrant and receipt in light of the former president’s public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances, and the substantial public interest in this matter.”

“I personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter,” Garland added. “Second, the department does not take such a decision lightly. Where possible, it is standard practice to seek less intrusive means as an alternative to a search and to narrowly scope any search that is undertaken.”

The Washington Post claimed in a report on Thursday that officials were allegedly searching for highly classified documents on “nuclear weapons” when they searched the property. The feds evidently worried that the former President would use the plans to build a nuclear weapon to become "Ruler for Life" of the United States.

The report said that those familiar with the matter did not offer any specific details on whether the alleged documents on nuclear weapons were about weapons that were possessed by the United States or a foreign nation, and they did not disclose what was recovered during the search. This is mainly due to the fact that there has not been enough time to come up with believable "specific details."

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

If this turns out to be a "nothing burger" as the previous hoaxes did, the press will scramble to provide cover for these scumcrumpets who have a target and are in search of a crime. But this just might be the biggest mistake they've made other than all the others.

Tweet

The 10-year-old abortion story: here's the truth

"I love my 10-year-old girls. They should all be able to get an abortion."

First it was the Russian hoax, then it was the bleach hoax, now it's a story about a 10-year-old Ohio girl who got pregnant from being raped and it comes just at the right political time in the wake of the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court.

Supposedly, this little girl was unable to get an abortion in Ohio and the mainstream media ate the story up like Brian Stelter being let loose at a donut factory. The story's only source came from the account of an abortion doctor, and she provided not one source to corroborate any of the details. But that didn't bother our alleged president, who used the story to make his point and blame Republican abortion bans that would then force the child to give birth to the child inside her. 

Biden said, "imagine being that little girl" while claiming Ohio forces raped children to go through with the pregnancy.

At least not everyone believed the story and the story clearly appears to be just that: a story, just like the hoaxes mentioned above.

Ohio attorney general Dave Yost spoke with FOX News' Jesse Watters on Monday and stated that there have been no reports of a 10-year-old girl being raped. There exist zero crime lab results from a rape kit, and no police report, which would be mandatory if this actually occurred. 

Yost also explained that Ohio's heartbeat law does not prohibit a minor who was raped from obtaining an abortion, so once again, Joe Biden was talking out of his nether regions. And the mainstream media knows this but chose not to mention it because it doesn't fit their narrative.

BREAKING: Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost says there is "not a whisper" that a 10-year-old child was raped and impregnated, there has been no request for crime lab results, and that Ohio's heartbeat law would have allowed such a young girl to get an abortion in the state. pic.twitter.com/oIhJzNiq52

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) July 11, 2022

The Ohio doctor did not report a rape and by Ohio law she is mandated to report the rape of a minor if she seeks an abortion. Therefore the doctor either broke the law or has a poor relationship with the truth. I suspect the latter to be the case.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Anyone with a functioning cortex should have questioned the veracity of this story, but let's not forget that we have a president who lacks that organ.

Tweet

Jussie Smollett blasts prosecutor for quoting him using the N- word

Alleged hoaxer and race baiting actor Jussie Smollett denied under oath all allegations that he had the Osundairo brothers go with him on a "dry run" rehearsal of his attack two days before an actual attack supposedly took place.

The actor's testimony ended Tuesday after the defense redirected prosecutor Dan Webb's line of questioning. 

Smollett’s attorney Nenye Uche focused on the Instagram messages that Webb alleged helped prove that he was keeping Bola Osundairo up-to-date on his whereabouts the night of the attack so he would know when and where to find him. 

Smollett said that “tons” of his followers responded to an Instagram story he posted about his flight being delayed and the incoming Polar Vortex in Chicago, which automatically begins a private messaging conversation on the app. 

The Polar Vortex, of course, is conducive for all 2 MAGA supporters in Chicago to wander out in the dead of night in red baseball caps, a noose and a container of bleach, just in case they happen to run into a gay Democrat. And of course they would recognize Jussie Smollett because they are big fans of "Empire" like all conservatives are, and probably of MSNBC too.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Uche also focused on Smollett’s allegation that the brothers reached out to him after the alleged real attack to try and extort $1 million each in exchange for telling the police that they did not plan the hoax. Under another redirect from Webb, Smollett noted that the brothers did not reach out to him about the money personally but did so through their representatives to his attorneys.

In attempting to prove Smollett was lying, Webb showed and read from private Instagram messages between Bola Osundairo and Smollett showing that the latter kept updating Bola on his whereabouts and flight delay information on the night of the attack. This makes the case that Smollett was working with Bola to time out the planned attack. Some of the messages included the use of the N-word, prompting Smollett to interrupt the prosecutor to ask him to spell or abbreviate the word so as not to offend "every African American in this room."

It's okay to use the N-word conspiratorially but not publicly because you might offend black people who are also allowed to use the N-word in private. 

Webb said that Smollett was welcome to read his own messages to the court but that he would not censor the quotations of the actor's messages. Smollett complied and the two moved on.

The remainder of the cross-examination saw Webb call key details of Smollett’s story of both the night of the attack and the alleged dry run into question, with Smollett denying throughout that he orchestrated anything with the Osundairo brothers, throwing them under the proverbial bus and referring to the siblings as “liars.”

Now we cannot know with absolute certainty that Jussie Smollett  is guilty of a racially-charged hoax but anyone who is being honest in their assessment has to consider the circumstances [Polar Vortex, MAGA people in the wee hours of the morning in Chicago, a city that voted 83% Democrat, having a noose and bleach handy, just in case, a signed check by Smollett to the brothers] and conclude that Smollett is a liar and not a very good friend, and should go to prison where he can make new friends.

But let's wait for the verdict and respect the law. 

Tweet

Jussie Smollett: victim of 'media gang-bang' his lawyer claims

It's a strategy that often works: when you are caught lying, blame your accuser(s) of trying to smear your integrity and play the victim card.

A grand jury's decision to indict Jussie "Something Smells" Smollett  on 16 felony counts was "outrageous," the defense lawyer for the alleged hoaxer said.

Such charges have never before been filed on a "victim of a hate crime," attorney Mark Geragos told anchor Anderson Cooper on CNN's "AC360," proving they are probably long overdue and should have been filed against Brett Kavanaugh's accusers.

“What is happening here is, frankly, a media gang-bang of this guy of unprecedented proportions," Geragos said., using the word 'frankly' to sound serious. "And that’s the reason I got into this. I’ve never seen a media pendulum swing more quickly and viciously and rob somebody of their presumption of innocence like this case. It’s startling the way people assume that he’s guilty." But less startling in the Donald Trump case, the Brett Kavanaugh case and practically any case involving anyone not on the intersectional left.

The indictment released Friday details Smollett’s disorderly conduct charges for allegedly fabricating a hate crime on January 29th in Chicago.

Geragos criticized Chicago investigators, who he insisted did not speak to anyone at 20th Century Fox or from the "Empire" television series over Smollett’s supposed salary frustrations. The network had no comment Friday.

But investigators did speak to the two "white" men who were paid with a Jussie Smollett personal check to were allegedly hired by the gay actor/singer to fake an attack on him.

Smollett claimed he went out for a Subway sandwich at 2 a.m. during a polar vortex, when two white men in MAGA hats happened to be carrying a rope, some fluid and fought with him. Somehow they knew his sexual orientation as they allegedly shouted "This is MAGA country" and used racial and sexual slurs as brave Jussie fought them off and they simply left.

The actor then went back to his apartment, rope still around his neck, sandwich still intact [he bravely held onto his Subway sandwich] waited for 40 minutes before calling police, told them he was on the phone [at 2 a.m.] with his manager when the attack occurred, and refused to let Chicago PD see his phone when they requested it.

The alleged hoaxer's lawyer also slammed the Chicago PD over alleged leaks to the media, saying “all of the information that was being leaked was false.”

When Smollett's account of the attack first emerged, he had defenders coming out of the walls: in Hollywood, the media, and among Democrats seeking the presidency in 2020, including U.S. Sens. Kamala Harris of California and Cory Booker of New Jersey, both of whom called the alleged attack a “modern-day lynching,” before Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, a black man with no ax to grind, went public with his investigators’ findings.

Smollett has reportedly been written off the final two episodes of the current season of “Empire.” It was unclear whether he will return next season.

It's unlikely that Smollett will actually serve any time in prison for his crime, in spite of the notion that if the police came up with two white men on video in the area at the time, that Smollett would have probably pointed the finger of guilt at them and let them go to jail.

But his lawyer is blaming everyone else, as lawyers must do, to take the focus off of the alleged hate hoaxer.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Linda Sarsour still holds most of the money she raised for Jewish gravesite desecration

She has the face heart of a serpent and a face of a weasel--Linda Sarsour--and it comes as no surprise that the anti-Semitic wench staged a publicity stunt after hundreds of Jewish gravestones were desecrated and destroyed at various cemeteries, [with a good possibility by her Islamic jihadist comrades] where she grabbed the news story and made it hers.

Sarsour jumped on a campaign to raise money to repair the the vandalism (and her reputation due to her long history of antisemitism), and began a campaign — named “Muslims Unite to Repair Jewish Cemetery” which raised $162,468 through the Muslim crowdfunding site LaunchGood, far beyond its set goal of $20,000.

Yet it's no surprise that only 30% of the proceeds were disbursed, while designated cemeteries pleaded for promised funds. Their calls were met with deafening silence and a hijab-covered sneer by the rodent-face Sarsour.

She hijacked the horror for her own aggrandizement, and the elite media ate it up. That's what the media does because they seem to either be afraid of being labeled Islamophobic or hate the status quo of our nation so much that they are willing to support anyone who goes against it.

But this wasn't the first time that the witch defrauded people before with hoaxes. She used the Islamophobic ploy to her benefit and cashed in on unfounded guilt.

However, exploiting dead Jews was a new low, even for that lowlife who's used to going low and will probably do it again as the media supports her as much as she supports the anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.

No surprise that the Women's March local chapters are distancing themselves from her and her ilk.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Clock Boy's "hate crime" lawsuit dismissed

Ahmed Mohamed, aka "Clock Boy" is best known for bringing what looked to be a bomb to his Irvine, Texas middle school in September 2015 and scaring the hell out of the staff with a bomb scare. 

The kid was subsequently suspended from school.

Ahmed Mohamed's father, Mohamed Mohamed (I have a feeling I can guess dad's middle name) filed a defamation case against Jim Hanson and the Center for Security Policy (CSP) due to the suspension, and alleged that Islamophobia was perpetrated on young Ahmed Mohamed.

The American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) and local counsel Peter Rowe, filed a motion to dismiss the case which also named Glenn Beck and Beck's production company and the local Fox affiliate.

Mohamed Mohamed had sued Hanson and CSP for statements Hanson made on Glenn Beck's show and the connection between the Clock Boy bomb hoax incident, the media frenzy that followed created mostly by Mohamed Mohamed, the Counsel on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front group that promotes "civilization jihad" in the USA.

During the hearing, Judge Moore pressed Mohamed Mohamed's lawyer, Fort Worth attorney Susan Hutchison, to provide any facts that would suggest Hanson and the other defendants had said anything that was defamatory or false about Mohamed Mohamed or his son Ahmed during the TV broadcast on Beck's show.

Well, Susie shuffled off to Buffalo through papers and after a full 15 minutes came up empty. There was no evidence--it was like a Judge Judy moment. The courtroom was so quiet, you could hear a Koran drop.

After the hearing ended, Judge Moore took the matter under advisement but told the parties that she would rule by day's end.

Judge Moore dismissed the lawsuit against Hanson and CSP with prejudice.

David Yerushalmi, the lawyer for AFLC, on leaving the courtroom said: "This lawsuit filed by Clock Boy's father is yet another example of Islamist lawfare, which is a component of the Muslim Brotherhood's civilization jihad."

Yerushalmi said the purpose of these lawsuits, formally labeled Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) is to intimidate into silence those who might comment publicly on the connection between jihad, terrorism, sharia and Islam.

He added: "The Islamists employ the progressive mainstream media to label any public criticism of a sharia-centric, jihad-driven Islam as 'Islamophobic,' and they add fear and financial ruin to the equation by utilizing the legal system to file SLAPP actions."



Tweet

Clock Boy sues: money for nothing

Mohamed X2, (aka Mohamed Mohamed) father of Ahmed Mohamed, aka "Clock Boy," aka "Clockmahd" sued Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro, Fox News and Glenn Beck for defamation among other things. In fact, I need to be careful he doesn't sue me for my freedom of speech, but the little diaper dump needs to find me first.

Back on September 14, 2015, when the young Islamist was a mere 13-years-old, he brought a clock to school which he claimed he "built." That was a lie, but when you're Islamically inclined, you call it taqiyya and Allah will forgive you.

By the way, ever notice how it's generally okay to be satirical about Allah but never about Mohamed? They kill you for even drawing a playful cartoon of the pedophile.

Anyway, the clock looked a lot like an explosive device, kind of like it was planned to look and it scared school authorities enough to call him out of class and call the police.

It was found to be merely a clock, not a bomb. Clock Boy claimed he designed it himself, but it was later learned that he lied and got the clock from Radio Shack. He had no real skills other than lying. 

The police temporarily held the kid, worried that he had constructed a "hoax bomb," before releasing him. 

In spite of the lie, Clock Boy made a big stink with the help of his father Mohamed Mohamed (or Mohamed X2) and cried Islamophobia. Because it was about a Muslim person, it got Obama involved and he had the liar to the White House as his personal guest.

Now Mohamed X2 is suing multiple media companies and personalities for defamation and in order to make some easy money. 

Included in the suit as mentioned is Ben Shapiro. Ben appeared on Fox News' The Kelly File, where he said the entire incident was "a hoax, this was a setup and that President Obama fell for it because it confirms a couple of his pre-stated biases against police and against people who he perceives to be Islamophobic." He also added that Obama was "constantly shooting first and asking questions later" regarding the police, and that "the story didn't hold water from the beginning. Within the first forty-eight hours it was clear that this was a bit of a set-up and it was clear that the story didn't hold together."

Shapiro figured that Mohamed "literally took the guts out of an old clock, the wiring, and he put it inside of a pencil box and proceeded to bring that into the school and this is not the first family incident that has been like this. His sister had an incident in 2009 that was somewhat similar," he said, referring to a Breitbart News report that "the sister of the boy who brought a suspected hoax-bomb to his Texas high school said she was suspended from a school in a prior bomb scare.

The suit against Shapiro, Fox News and other commentators demands an apology. But the family also sued the city of Irving, Texas and the school district for about $15 million and apologies.

In a similar incident at the Sandy High, Oregon High School, a student named Levi Frunk was suspended and will miss playing in his homecoming football game, because he invented a homemade phone charger and used it in school. He was suspended for not being Muslim, but instead is Jewish. I'm not suggesting they suspended him because he is Jewish, but if he was Muslim, I have a suspicion the school would have let it slide.

Ironically, hate crimes against Jews is about 60% while it's about 11% for Muslims.

Ironically, Frunk didn't take a digital clock apart (like Ahmed admitted in an interview) he actually invented something. 

Unlike Ahmed with his checkered school record, Frunk had an exemplary record. He was at the top of his class, considered one of the brightest kids.

Frunk cooperated with school authorities and answered all their questions. Ahmed did not cooperate--he suddenly went mute.

But unlike Ahmed, Levi didn't get to meet with President Obama. 

What's wrong with this picture?

Tweet