Former Planned Parenthood Director Kills Himself While Under Investigation in Child Porn Case

Tim Yergeau

Tim Yergeau, 35, was found dead in his apartment in New Haven, CT on Tuesday, just five days after the police screwed up a raid on his apartment and breached the wrong door, The Middletown Press reported.

Yergeau, a former Planned Parenthood director for a company known for killing babies, killed himself earlier in the week as law enforcement was investigating him in a child pornography case.

“The person who died was definitely the suspect in a child pornography investigation and the person who committed suicide,” New Haven Police Chief Karl Jacobson said Wednesday. So Yergeau was likely guilty and issued his own sentence. 

The search warrant allows police to look at Yergeau’s electronic devices, but he was not arrested at the time of the police raid.

“It was an open investigation, so he knew he was going to be arrested,” Jacobson said.

At the time of his suicide, Yergeau worked at the Long Wharf Theatre. However, he previously held the position of director of strategic communications for the Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, The Blaze reported and he had also worked for the New Haven Free Public Library Foundation.

Yergeau was a true woke leftist who promoted LGBTQ+1KBG causes on his social media.

In one Instagram post, he proudly showed a picture of Planned Parenthood buttons with rainbows on them. Another photo showed Yergeau sporting a shirt with the common pro-abortion talking point, “Bans Off Our Bodies,” printed on it. 

So killing babies and engaging in child pornography was his modus operandi. 

In December 2018, the alleged sexual deviant posted, “Excited to announce that today I start a new job on the marketing/communications team at Planned Parenthood of Southern New England. Excited to be working on issues I’m passionate about: healthcare access, reproductive and sexual health, diversity and inclusion, civic engagement, and voting rights.”

When police arrived to serve out a search warrant at Yergeau’s apartment, cops mistakenly broke down his neighbor’s door and handcuffed a woman before they realized their screwup. 

“I started running down the hallway; it was just like a movie. They had guns and flashlights on me,” the neighbor Stacey Wezenter said. “They put me against the wall and handcuffed me. I was crying and saying, ‘What’s happening?’”

Wezenter, whose 20-year-old and 4-year-old children were home when police breached her door, said she relives the moment every time she walks down her hallway, so she's probably going to sue.

“What if I had a gun permit? What if I came down the hallway with a gun? Would I have gotten shot? What if my 4-year-old had woken up? Would they have shot him?” Wezenter said Wednesday. “You just don’t do that to people.”

New Haven police apologized for breaching the woman’s apartment and said it had launched an investigation into how the mistake happened.

“Unfortunately, a mistake was made,” Chief Jacobson said. “We feel for the woman and we’re going to do everything we can to make it right.”

Meanwhile, Yergeau is dead and the child pornography case is solved.

Tweet

Suspended Snopes co-founder caught plagiarizing 54 articles

The leftist "fact-checker" website Snopes retracted several dozen articles after David Mikkelson, its co-founder, was snagged plagiarizing 54 articles occurring between 2015 to 2019. BuzzFeed News was the first to expose the scandal of the website. 

[H/T The Blaze]

Mikkelson, also the executive editor reportedly was responsible for "handling everything from researching and writing articles about urban legends to managing the site's technical infrastructure." 

Mikkelson, who founded the fact-checking site in 1994 along with his ex-wife, is now suspended from his own website after the plagiarism claims surfaced, and that's a fact. He used his own name, a pseudonym "Jeff Zarronandia," and "Snopes Staff" as his byline.

Some of the outlets he used for his articles were LA Times, The Guardian, and Reuters, according to BuzzFeed News, who also reports they obtained emails and Slack messages that pointed the finger at Mikkelson.

In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Mikkelson cited ignorance for his plagiarism claiming that he didn't come from a journalism background. But that's like crashing a car into a crowd and say you didn't learn how to drive because you never took a driving lesson.

Snopes' vice president of editorial and managing editor, Doreen Marchionni, suspended Mikkelson from his duties pending a full investigation, but he still remains a 50% shareholder of the propaganda machine.

Snopes plans to retract all of the plagiarized articles, but "the page itself will remain accessible" and feature an editor's note to explain the "source-attribution problem in the original story and link to the original news source(s)."

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

While Democrats push for voting by mail, some get busted for a voter fraud scheme

Michael Jackson [L] Alex Mendez [R]

New Jersey politicians have been charged in a massive mail-in voter fraud scheme and face serious prison time.

[H/T: The Blaze]

New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal filed voter fraud charges against four men, including two Paterson City officials, who allegedly engaged in a mail-in ballot scheme during last month's special election.

Grewal charged Paterson City Councilman Michael Jackson, Councilman-elect Alex Mendez, and two other scumcrumpets after the U.S. Postal Inspection Service alerted his office that it had found hundreds of ballots in a single Paterson City mailbox, according to InsiderNJ.

Over 3,000 ballots were set aside over voter fraud concerns in the Paterson City Council election, according to WNBC-TV. In all, they received 16,747 ballots, but only 13,557 were deemed legitimate.

Thus, 19% of the ballots were rejected, and over 800 of those were found tethered together in mailboxes. Unless a huge family of 800 individuals mailed their ballots in a family stack, the tethered ballots were fraudulent.

The alleged fraud is very significant in that election as the incumbent councilman only kept his seat by eight votes and Mendez was elected by less than 250 votes.

Jackson was charged with four crimes, including fraud in casting mail-in vote and falsifying records.

The Attorney General's office stated:

It is alleged that Jackson violated state election laws as a candidate by approaching one or more voters in Paterson in the district where he was running and collecting their official mail-in ballots for delivery to the Passaic County Board of Elections. It is further alleged that these mail-in ballots were delivered to the Board of Elections without information identifying the bearer, in violation of state election laws. In addition, Jackson allegedly procured and had in his possession more than three official mail-in ballots which were neither his own ballots, nor ballots for which he was identified as an authorized bearer. Lastly, Jackson allegedly received the official mail-in ballot of one voter without the ballot having been voted or sealed, and that ballot was subsequently delivered to the Board of Elections in a sealed envelope without information identifying the bearer.

Mendez was charged with six criminal charges, including election fraud and falsifying records.

From the Attorney General's Office:

It is alleged that Mendez violated state election laws as a candidate by approaching one or more voters in Paterson in the district where he was running and collecting their official mail-in ballots for delivery to the Passaic County Board of Elections. It is further alleged that these mail-in ballots were delivered to the Board of Elections without information identifying the bearer in violation of state election laws. In addition, Mendez allegedly procured or submitted one or more voter registration applications, which he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, in that he knew the person for whom the application was procured was not eligible to vote in the election district identified on the application.

"Today's charges send a clear message: if you try to tamper with an election in New Jersey, we will find you and we will hold you accountable," Grewal said. "We will not allow a small number of criminals to undermine the public's confidence in our democratic process."

Jackson faces more than 10 years in prison while Mendez faces more than 31 years in prison. It will be a veritable miracle if either man serves anything close to that amount of time in the slammer.

Democrats continue in their nationwide push for mail-in voting as a method, along with massive public protests in the streets, to reduce coronavirus spread.

Republicans generally oppose mail-in voting and the destruction of property, arguing the former opens the door to voter fraud while the latter is anarchy.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Pro-Life Philly Rally Garners over 1,000 Participants in Response to Sims' Bullying and Doxxing

Rep[ulsive] Brian Sims (D-PA) live-streamed himself bravely bullying three teenage girls and an elderly woman in front of a Philadelphia Planned Parenthood infanticide facility over the weekend. As they prayed for the lives that were being extinguished inside the building, Sims ironically told the girls and women that THEY should be ashamed and that they were not real Christians. For Sims, killing babies in the womb because of the inconvenience they may cause to the mother is the Christian way to go.

But alas, his scumbaggery was met with peaceful resistance when over 1,000 people showed up in front of the slaughterhouse at the urging of the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh, who organized the rally.

The people involved probably weren’t expecting that many folks to show up for the last-minute rally, but that’s exactly what happened.

Matt Walsh was one of the speaker’s at the successful gathering and said he was humbled by the turnout. “Pro aborts could never do what we did today. They'd never get such an energetic and overwhelming response and attendance on such short notice, or any notice. Just like they'll never hold a march as big as the March For Life. The pro-abortion movement is a sad and lethargic thing,” the prominent pro-life voice and religious Christian tweeted.

One of the highlights of the day was from “Unplanned” author Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood executive turned pro-life advocate. The movie was based on her experience having worked for PP.

Speaking to the energetic crowd, Johnson emphasized that both the mother and the child must always be treated with dignity.

“It is time to refuse to ‘choose.’ We will not choose between one or the other. We will respect both women and their children, and their femininity, and their reproduction, and their fertility. And we will continue to do it until clinics like this no longer exist, and every women who walks into a physician’s office is actually treated with love and respect and care,” she told the audience, mostly comprised of women.

Another moving moment came when the attendees prayed for the unborn.

Nate Madden of The Blaze noted that the prayer outside the clinic comes just days after the execrable Sims live-streamed himself harassing teen girls for praying outside that very clinic.

Sims was addressed directly by Walsh at the rally, too: “We are sending a message to bullies like Brian Sims. We will not be intimidated, we will not be silenced. If you try to shut us up, we are only going to get louder. If you try to shame us, we are only going to stand taller,” he told the crowd.

Though Sims was invited to attend the rally, he did not show due to his fear of grownups under the age of 60.

Ashley Garecht, the mother of two of the teenage girls Sims bullied and attempted to dox was there as well.

“I am so grateful because we are here today to witness the tangible fruit of incredible effort. And I know, I know, that there are people who have been doing this work for decades and they are not always given the gift of seeing the tangible fruit of their work,” Garecht said.

“God is moving in incredible ways and we’ve just along for the ride; we are standing on the side of angels,” she added.

Garecht and her husband have helped raise over $118,000 for the Pro-Life Union of Greater Philadelphia since Monday, so stick that in your pussy-hat, Sims.

The impressive rally was made possible by the pro-life movement teaming together and by individuals getting out and putting their feet in motion for what they believe in.

Thank you, Rep. Sims for doing all that you did to bring us together and help raise money for the plight of the unborn. Did you know that the most dangerous place for a black baby to be in New York City is in his/her mother's womb?


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

Harlem Shake tells leftist prof 'Get your burgers somewhere else'

Here's an interesting concept: white people can be racist regarding white people. In fact, any racial group can be racist, be it against other racial groups, or their own.

A white Rutgers University professor was called out for his racist rant about white people by the owners of the Harlem Shake Restaurant, in Harlem, New York.

James Livingston a liberal professor of history posted an anti-white racist rant on his Facebook page on May 31 because he became angry over the behavior of white children at the Harlem Shake restaurant where he frequents, saying that he wanted to "resign" from being white. Unless you're like Rachel Dolezal, you can't actually resign from your biologically assigned race, but that's another story.

"OK, officially, I now hate white people," Livingston posted. He removed the Facebook post but it was captured in a screen shot by The Daily Caller. "I am a white people (sic), for God's sake, but can we keep them--us--us out of my neighborhood?"

The owners of Harlem Shake told the racist idiot that in no uncertain terms is racism welcome in their establishment--including white people who cannot stand white people.

"Slide around the floor, you little s**thead, sing loudly, you moron. Do what you want, nobody here is gonna restrict your right to be white," he said. [How is that even possible?]

"I hereby resign from my race. F**k these people. Yeah, I know it's about access to my dinner. F**k you, too."

The owners of Harlem Shake certainly didn't want their establishment associated with a racist rant and issued a statement to The Blaze addressing Livingston directly, and advising him to "get your burgers somewhere else."

Partners Jelena Pasic and Dardra Coaxum wrote: "For five years and counting, we built our business on a prerogative [of] cherishing diversity within our ownership, staff and customers in our beloved Harlem COMMUNITY.

"We refuse to be sucked into your racist rants, so if you wish to name drop, please use names of those with similar views.

"We ask that our name is removed from your rant because we do not want to have anything to do with you. And yeah, we ask that you get your burgers somewhere else. We do not tolerate 'racism' either. We thrive on equality and fairness and have full intentions to keep it that way!"

Separately in Instagram the two women made their point separately and clear: "We proudly have diverse ownership, staff and most importantly, customers!"

Livingston is a radical leftist and loves big government. He wrote an op-ed for the failing New York Times in 2011 about how little private investment matters to economic growth. It's obvious he should stick to teaching history or something that requires rote memory rather than deeper thinking.

According to Fox News, Livingston is currently under investigation by the Rutgers-New Brunswick campus for violations of university policy against discrimination and harassment in connection with this case.

"There is no place for racial intolerance at Rutgers," spokesperson Dory Devlin told Fox News.


Tweet

NY Public Schools promote course justifying suicide bombing

Aftermath of Jerusalem bus bombing(Photo: Menahem Kahana/AFP/Getty Images)

The New York State "Education Department" has developed and promoted a lesson plan called "Dying to be a Martyr." There is a video in the course that explains why it's Kosher to kill Jews, taking the perspective of an Islamic jihadi. 

The plan has been offered to teachers over the last ten years and it's financed through taxpayer-funded Public Broadcasting Service's "LearningMedia" website. The website offers a "media-on-demand service offering educators access to the best of public media and delivers research-based, classroom-ready digital learning experiences."

The lesson plan is aimed at high school students and contain no instructions for teachers to criticize these views nor videos featuring Israeli response to the bogus claims.

One teacher instruction is thus: 

(Mohanned feels he would rather die and be a martyr than live his life, sees his life as hollow--in contrast he sees Israelis as happy, going out, having fun, traveling.) Ask your students why Mohanned may feel that way (Answers may include: Palestinians have less land, fewer privileges, cannot come and go as they please.)

 When the story was investigated by The Blaze, the lesson plan was promoted by the New York State Education Department (NYSED), a request was made for comment by state officials at which time NYSED's website dumped the lesson plan.

But the lesson plan was listed on a different NYSED website and it also promoted a video titled "Story of Islam: A History of the World's Most Misunderstood Faith."

It's true: many people still believe that Islam is a religion of peace--it obviously is not.

Of all the 40 lesson plans on the website, only "Dying to be a Martyr" was listed in complete form.

Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab.



Tweet

Tomi Lahren apparently needs a warm butt to think

(Photo: Heat Street)

Tomi Lahren, the 24-year-old pseudo conservative used to be an anchor at The Blaze until she announced on national TV that she was pro-abortion. She was then told that she would no longer appear on the conservative network and decided to sue them for wrongful termination. 

I'm not a lawyer but it seems to me that if your values are contrary to the network you work for, and you make them public, the network has the right to take you off their payroll. I may be wrong, but it certainly makes sense and I believe Lahren is going to lose her case, which I hope she does.

Killing babies is not a conservative ideology.

But the latest dirty laundry to reach the noses of the public is how Lahren treated other employees at The Blaze. 

According to The Daily Caller, Blaze staff didn't appreciate how Lahren treated them. In fact, according to The Daily Caller, she made them heat up her "butt warming pads" in the microwave before every shoot. 

(Photo: Amazon)

For some reason, the staffers found that humiliating, but Lahren probably needed the butt stimulation to help her think since her pronouncement on abortion clearly came from her nether regions.

For those folks out there who, like Lahren, think with their butts, these warming pads can be found on Amazon under Thermalon Microwave Activated Moist Heat Pad. 

But a DIY version can be easily made by taking a small pillow, stuffing it with raw oats and sewing it shut. It can be microwaved for 4 minutes and provides at least 20 minutes of moist heat to get those derrière neurons kicking right in.

It's also great if you pull an ass muscle, like when liberals think too hard.


Follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow button in the right margin


Tweet

Tomi Lahren sues Beck & The Blaze over wrongful termination

Pseudo conservative Tomi Lahren, is suing conservative media outlet, The Blaze, and her former boss, Glenn Beck for wrongful termination over her pro-abortion comments.

The lawsuit was filed Friday in Dallas County and says The Blaze cancelled Lahren's allegedly conservative show after she "made a controversial abortion statements last month on The View. 

The suit said The Blaze wanted to continue paying Lahren, "presumably hoping they could find an exit strategy to sanitize their unlawful conduct" in breaking her two-year employment contract, which was to continue through September 30th. 

The Blaze said Friday that Lahren hadn't been terminated.

"It is puzzling that an employee who remains under contract (and is still being paid) has sued us for being fired, especially when we continue to comply fully with the terms of our agreement with her," a Blaze spokesman said, adding that Beck wouldn't comment directly on the suit.

Lahren's suit alleges that the turmoil over her non-conservative comments was "a public smear campaign" orchestrated to "inflate Beck's profile, from what has become a mediocre following, all at [Lahren's] expense."

According to the suit, The Blaze isn't allowing Lahren access to her Facebook page, with its 4.2 million followers. Supposedly, this has "irreparably harmed" her.

How do they know it's 'irreparable'? 

"I can't sit here and be a hypocrite and say I'm for limited government but I think the government should decide what women do with their bodies," she told the audience of The View.

"No one told [Lahren] that her statements on The View were improper or inappropriate; and, indeed, that [Lahren's] point of view is just that--her point of view and freedom of expression," the suit states adding that Beck and The Blaze knew of her pro-choice position, which she had expressed before, and "never took any issue with it."

Except that it's not true. Last year Lahren appeared to take a pro-life view on abortion, so what are her lawyers talking about? It's on YouTube. [See video below.]

Beck said that Lahren's claim of being libertarian clashes with her support of President Trump's executive orders and health care proposals, implying she doesn't know what she's talking about.

The suit alleges that The Blaze's resources director called Lahren and told her that "her employment was terminated, she would have no more shows," solely due to her pro-choice comments.

While [Lahren's] case appears to be based upon her freedom to choose, it doesn't take into account that the views she expressed to the public on TV is contrary to the ideology of her employer and thus, would tend to damage the employer's product. (This is similar to President Trump appointing Ivanka and Kushner, both extreme liberals, into his administration--this may turn off many true conservatives.)

Brian Lauten, Lahren's lawyer, said, "She's like an eagle that feels like it's had its wings clipped." Seriously, he said that and even added: "She's ready to pursue her career and reconnect with her millions of followers."

Lahren may be a bird, perhaps the seductive cuckoo, but she's certainly not an eagle. 

She's asking for attorney's fees and costs, but I would hope that if she loses, and she should it seems, that she would have to pay the fees for The Blaze. Why should they have all the risks? 

And why should they retain someone whose job it is to disseminate the political and ideological position of her employer when her views oppose that position?

Tweet

Pro-choice Tomi Lahren: suspended and a hypocrite

She may be pretty but she's also pretty lame. Tomi Lahren has been suspended from The Blaze, where she works as a so-called conservative anchor. The Daily Caller was first to report the story.

Lahren caused a cow-chip storm when she revealed on The View that she is pro-choice when it comes to killing babies inside the womb. 

It isn't yet known if this was the reason for her suspension, but it's a really good reason to assess her actual political ideology and her understanding of conservatism. 

Right-leaning talk-show hosts and conservative pundits lashed out at the little blonde cutie, including Glenn Beck, the network founder of The Blaze. 

Beck promised to address the situation on his radio show Monday but before it was to happen it was learned by the Daily Caller that Lahren would not be returning to her time slot until next week at the earliest.

It was reported that there was tension between her and some of her colleagues, including head-lining hosts. Lahren is no stranger to controversial statements and no stranger to flip-flopping when it suits her or when she forgets what she'd already stated on a position.

She's about as conservative as Bernie Sanders.

Here's what she said on The View: 

"I'm pro choice, and here's why. I am a constitutional, y'know, someone that loves the Constitution. I'm someone that's for limited government. So I can't sit here and be a hypocrite and say I'm for limited government but I think the government should decide what women do with their bodies. I can sit here and say that, as a Republican and I can say, you know what, I'm for limited government, so stay out of my guns, and you can stay out of my body as well."

The audience, equipped with a 105 IQ collectively, applauded like trained monkeys. 

The issue of abortion has nothing to do with limited government--she conflated the two and was playing to the choir.

When it comes to the abortion issue, the fake conservative flip-flopped like a freshly caught trout at the edge of a stream. 

In an article by Red State, a video shows her on her show, "Final Thoughts" in a segment where she went full-throttle after Lena Dunham who had stated on her podcast that she wished she had an abortion. Lahren's response was a lot different back then: 

"This woman, and I use the term loosely, single-handedly kills legitimacy of the modern-day feminist movement every time she speaks . . . does she realize how damaging she is to her own narrative? Think about it: the 'pro-choicers' are supposed to be about rare and safe abortions. That's how they avoid sounding like straight-up baby killers . . . then we have Lena freaking Dunham out there wishing she could have murdered a fetus. Wishing for the option to kill your child doesn't exactly say much about the cause, her character, or the pro-choice movement. . . "

Lahren probably forgot that anything you say in the media is going to be recorded and your words may come back to haunt you. Her words: "Wishing for the option to kill your child doesn't exactly say much about the cause, her character, or the pro-choice movement." 

But that was then.

There's talk that Lahren wants to move up in the conservative world, and even Sean Hannity thinks she's the grooviest thing since LP records. President Trump reportedly called to congratulate her after she defended him on Hannity's show.

Perhaps Mr. Trump will hire her for her support of him against the "fake news" media. That sounds like her plan.


Tweet

Is Iran Getting Ready for War?

In an article on 4/6/15 by Sharona Schwartz in The Blaze, the author reported that Middle East intelligence agencies think Iran may be preparing for war if the ridiculous nuke efforts go bad. This was reported by Israel's Channel 10 last Sunday.

According to the TV station, Arab intelligence conveyed a message to the U.S. along with Britain and France, both nations are included in the so-called negotiations, saying that Iran is concerned about the messaging that was taking place between Lurch and Ernest Moniz with them, that they are preparing their Revolutionary Guard for armed conflict if the talks begin to circle the drain. 

The next "deadline" (LOL) is for June 30th.

The terrorist nation of Iran is reportedly going to close the Strait of Hormuz, where international oil is shipped from, and this could effect efforts to counter the Shi'ite terrorists in a conflict as it would negatively impact on military fuel needs.

According to Channel 10, the Saudis are critical of the deal (as anyone with a brain should be) and are especially worried about the ability to actually monitor these sneaky terrorists with unannounced inspections.

The Wall Street Journal reported that during the negotiations, the Pentagon "upgraded and tested the largest bunker-buster bomb in the U.S. arsenal . . . readying a weapon that could destroy or disable Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear facilities should a nuclear deal fall apart and the White House decide to take military action."

It's hard to imagine Obama taking any kind of serious action against a Muslim nation, especially a military action.


But Iran is getting its target practice in on a mock-up of a U.S. aircraft carrier. We should be practicing on mock-ups of Ayatollahs.

Iran may or may not be getting ready for war in the near future, but you can bet your Bible that if they get the bomb, they will not hesitate to use it. After all, it isn't like jihadists are afraid of blowing themselves up for a bunch of hairy virgins.

Tweet

The New Culture of Anti-Semitism

If you want to run for student government at UCLA, it's best you're anti-Semitic if you really want to win.

Sharona Schwartz, of The Blaze, reports that candidates planning to run for undergraduate student government are being asked to vow that they will refuse to go on a free or sponsored trip to Israel. According to the Daily Bruin, the UCLA newspaper, most of the candidates have signed the pledge.

The anti-Semitic group, Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace, along with the Armenian Students' Association drafted the absurd pledge. What the Jewish Voice for Peace does not seem to realize is that the only way the Palestinians want peace for the Jews, is for them to no longer have voices--the dead cannot speak.

Take a guess whether or not the Muslim Students Association supported this bizarre measure.

The Students' Association Ethics statement requires council members to not go on trips to Israel that are paid for or even partially sponsored by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) the Hasbara Fellowships, and the Anti-Defamation League, the Daily Bruin stated. But students are free to travel to Israel with Palestinian mosque or church groups.

It's almost as if a large part of the United States is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome

For the full article go to The Blaze

Tweet

First Amendment: What, He Worry?

Should the Federal Communications Commission have the right to monitor American newsrooms? Sure, if you believe they have the right to redefine the US Constitution. Think of the FCC as your Big Brother who knows what's best for you. Not.

Here's the deal. The FCC wants to launch a new study so that they can decide what you news you "need" to hear. Your opinion doesn't matter. These FCC clowns will conduct a "General Population Survey" to "measure what your real needs are versus what you think they are." So, what you perceive you need to know is not the same as what the GOVERNMENT says you need to know.