Kerry Defends the Stupidly Bad Deal

Hairplugs McGoo and his comical sidekick

John Kerry, our so-called Secretary of State, showed just how bright he is: the "anytime--anywhere" inspections were never on the table. Why weren't they on the table? Because the Obama administration is about as professional as a Kindergarten kid.

Kerry is so stupid, he actually believes that snap inspections should not be part of the agreement, and worse, that the United States should be part of the team doing the inspecting. What a bunch of amateurs we have in this clusterfart of an administration. 

Ronald Reagan said, "Trust, but verify." Who is going to verify the absence of Iranian nuclear weapons for us--another Islamic nation? And why are we not allowed to be part of the inspection team?

Kerry told Fox News that "There is no such standard within arms control inspections. We never had a discussion about 'anywhere, anytime' managed access."

Why not, Mr. Hairplugs? 

Plugs McKenzie and Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz claim that International Atomic Energy Agency inspections within 24 days of a request will be sufficient to detect nuclear activity.

Sorry, I don't believe them. In fact, I don't believe Iran will tell the inspectors where all the sites are located and I believe that this administration is the most dangerous bunch of fools this country has ever had the misfortune to have in power.

Iran still chants "Death to America, death to Israel." Does Obama think they're kidding or does he have more covert intentions?

Kerry couldn't negotiate a chocolate bar away from a 5 year old. Our Americans remain in captivity, Iran remains a terrorist state, and Obama cares more about his crappy legacy than the safety of the American people. 

Tehran was granted a last-minute request to lift the arms embargo and we still have four Americans being held by Iran. Kerry's excuse was: "Every single meeting, everywhere in the world that ever took place with the Iranians, we have raised the issue of the American citizens. And we are working on the issue of the American citizens even now."

Raising an issue and raising hell with Iran are two different things. We needed to be tough, unlike Kerry and his sideshow clown. We needed to tell the ayatollah that if they don't release our people, we will make the current sanctions seem like high school detention compared to what we'd do next.

The Iranians are laughing at our Kerry clown and his sidekick. The Iranians got everything they wanted and Obama got to say he has a deal. What a loser we have running the country; it's embarrassing. 



Tweet

Poor Iran is the real victim

Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif is telling world powers to stop the "coercion and pressure," at the nuclear talks. 

"Like dude, if you just go along with us and let us build secret electricity plants, we can electrocute the bad Muslims in the Middle East. It's a win-win for everyone except ISIS. And hey, I almost forgot, death to Israel!"

Zarif didn't mention the U.S. specifically, but we all know who he was talking to--Barry and the left--and as it now stands, a deal would end sanctions on Iran and allow them to build the damn bomb in peace.

The West is afraid that Iran might develop a nuclear weapons program under the present circumstances. Let me assure the West, they will definitely develop nukes if we so much as take a small hit of Nyquil for that burning, aching, gotta go to bed feeling.

To think otherwise is not only naive, it's downright suicidal.

So-called Secretary of State John Swiftboat Kerry and Zarif met yet again on Friday as U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz met with Iran's atomic energy agency chief Ali- Akbar Salehi (his friends call him Allahu Akbar and blow  something up).

Kerry said the talks "are making progress," but added that there is yet "a lot of work to do." Then again, Kerry claimed that his war medals are legitimate but that is highly doubtful and certainly open to scrutiny.

John Kerry must be disappointed with the way the talks have been going. He told Zarif that he wished the United States had a leader more like the Ayatollah. That's according to the Iranians.

Tweet

Is Iran Getting Ready for War?

In an article on 4/6/15 by Sharona Schwartz in The Blaze, the author reported that Middle East intelligence agencies think Iran may be preparing for war if the ridiculous nuke efforts go bad. This was reported by Israel's Channel 10 last Sunday.

According to the TV station, Arab intelligence conveyed a message to the U.S. along with Britain and France, both nations are included in the so-called negotiations, saying that Iran is concerned about the messaging that was taking place between Lurch and Ernest Moniz with them, that they are preparing their Revolutionary Guard for armed conflict if the talks begin to circle the drain. 

The next "deadline" (LOL) is for June 30th.

The terrorist nation of Iran is reportedly going to close the Strait of Hormuz, where international oil is shipped from, and this could effect efforts to counter the Shi'ite terrorists in a conflict as it would negatively impact on military fuel needs.

According to Channel 10, the Saudis are critical of the deal (as anyone with a brain should be) and are especially worried about the ability to actually monitor these sneaky terrorists with unannounced inspections.

The Wall Street Journal reported that during the negotiations, the Pentagon "upgraded and tested the largest bunker-buster bomb in the U.S. arsenal . . . readying a weapon that could destroy or disable Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear facilities should a nuclear deal fall apart and the White House decide to take military action."

It's hard to imagine Obama taking any kind of serious action against a Muslim nation, especially a military action.


But Iran is getting its target practice in on a mock-up of a U.S. aircraft carrier. We should be practicing on mock-ups of Ayatollahs.

Iran may or may not be getting ready for war in the near future, but you can bet your Bible that if they get the bomb, they will not hesitate to use it. After all, it isn't like jihadists are afraid of blowing themselves up for a bunch of hairy virgins.

Tweet

Dealing with dingbats

 Having the Obama administration negotiate a deal is not so different than having a spoiled rich kid negotiate the price of a prostitute. All the Obama administration wants is the deal; all the kid wants is sex.

In the end, they will both be screwed.

But along with Obama, we also stand to lose a lot and Israel stands to lose it all. Iran has made their anti-Semitic intentions known worldwide and our so-called president seems to be on the wrong side on this issue.

Obama is saying that the skeptics and our allies should back the deal (which is really just a preliminary agreement without even a handshake) because it is a "forever agreement" that would block the steps for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, and it that it would allegedly set tough international inspections with no end date.

Energy Secretary and frustrated piano virtuoso, Ernest Moniz, made a White House appearance. "I want to say this is not an agreement for 10 years or 15 years or 20 years. It is a long-term agreement with a whole set of phases," said Moniz as he brushed back his Lord Fauntleroy quaff. "And if Iran earns over this time period trust and confidence in their peaceful objectives, well then over time the constraints will, in phases, ease up, but never get lower than the additional protocol and all of the access that it provides."

Think of Moniz, a nuclear physicist, as you would Sheldon Cooper of the Big Bang Theory. Imagine Sheldon negotiating with the likes of Iran, a country who calls for Death to America every Friday morning and seeks the total annihilation of Israel.

 "So that's the way we're thinking about it," Moniz said. "It's not a fixed-year agreement. It's a forever agreement in a certain sense, with different stages."

That 'certain sense' he speaks about, is likely dependent upon the time frame that Iran takes to violate the deal in secret.
 
So now you understand why this deal would in all probability end in a big bang, but not in theory.

In any case, the deal supposedly includes a) a commitment by Iran to reduce the number of its centrifuges by two-thirds and enrich uranium with 5,060 of these centrifuges for 10 years; b) a commitment by Iran not to enrich uranium at the Fordo facility (where they did so in secret) for at least 15 years; and c) a commitment by Iran not to build any new facilities to enrich uranium for 15 years.

I could go on, but my unicorn just arrived and I have to be heading out to Andromeda. 



Tweet