'Big Bang Theory' creator Chuck Lorre mocks Sarah Sanders' looks and Christian faith because he sucks

Chuck Lorre is the creator of the CBS sitcom "The Big Bang Theory" and because he isn't man enough to confront Sarah Sanders directly, the coward snuck another anti-Trump message into the popular show’s credits on Thursday night. This time the creep went after Press Secretary Sarah Sanders’ appearance and Christian faith.

How very mature of him to go after her looks. It isn't like he's a freaking model, unless he's modeling a horse's butt.

 The on-screen message during the show’s closing credits read:

"God told me he hasn't spoken to Sarah Sanders since she was fourteen years old and praying for her skin to clear up. I have no reason to doubt Him,”

Seriously?  This is your courageous attack on the White House Press Secretary and Christianity? You make fun of her skin? What are you, four?

Media Research Center (MRC) contributor Rebecca Downs, who noticed and captured the message, wondered if a Democrat would be treated this way. Gee, who knows? They really went after AOC on her Green New Deal and how we're going to get rid of farting cows and planes. 

Oh wait, no they didn't.

Chuck Lorre

“It’s also been established that it’s sexist and wrong to go after women for their looks,” MRC's Downs wrote. “Is it only liberal women that this applies to?”

CBS did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment because they, like Lorre, know that Sanders has a decent relationship with that network, and they worry she'll find them and kick their collective butts.

Lorre frequently mocks Trump and members of his administration from the safety of his bathroom. Last October, a message urged “God” to increase midterm voter turnout to combat a “fascist, hate-filled, fear-mongering, demagogic, truth-shattering, autocratic golf cheater." 

Chuck Schumer was unavailable for comment but judging by the flaring of his nostrils, it was obvious the insult bothered him.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment but Sanders challenged Lorre to a fistfight in back of a school. Lorre declined and has not been seen in over a week.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Dealing with dingbats

 Having the Obama administration negotiate a deal is not so different than having a spoiled rich kid negotiate the price of a prostitute. All the Obama administration wants is the deal; all the kid wants is sex.

In the end, they will both be screwed.

But along with Obama, we also stand to lose a lot and Israel stands to lose it all. Iran has made their anti-Semitic intentions known worldwide and our so-called president seems to be on the wrong side on this issue.

Obama is saying that the skeptics and our allies should back the deal (which is really just a preliminary agreement without even a handshake) because it is a "forever agreement" that would block the steps for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, and it that it would allegedly set tough international inspections with no end date.

Energy Secretary and frustrated piano virtuoso, Ernest Moniz, made a White House appearance. "I want to say this is not an agreement for 10 years or 15 years or 20 years. It is a long-term agreement with a whole set of phases," said Moniz as he brushed back his Lord Fauntleroy quaff. "And if Iran earns over this time period trust and confidence in their peaceful objectives, well then over time the constraints will, in phases, ease up, but never get lower than the additional protocol and all of the access that it provides."

Think of Moniz, a nuclear physicist, as you would Sheldon Cooper of the Big Bang Theory. Imagine Sheldon negotiating with the likes of Iran, a country who calls for Death to America every Friday morning and seeks the total annihilation of Israel.

 "So that's the way we're thinking about it," Moniz said. "It's not a fixed-year agreement. It's a forever agreement in a certain sense, with different stages."

That 'certain sense' he speaks about, is likely dependent upon the time frame that Iran takes to violate the deal in secret.
 
So now you understand why this deal would in all probability end in a big bang, but not in theory.

In any case, the deal supposedly includes a) a commitment by Iran to reduce the number of its centrifuges by two-thirds and enrich uranium with 5,060 of these centrifuges for 10 years; b) a commitment by Iran not to enrich uranium at the Fordo facility (where they did so in secret) for at least 15 years; and c) a commitment by Iran not to build any new facilities to enrich uranium for 15 years.

I could go on, but my unicorn just arrived and I have to be heading out to Andromeda. 



Tweet