Breaking: Video Shows Kenji Goyo Beheaded by ISIS

It appears from an online video that Jihadi John, of the Islamic State, has beheaded the Japanese journalist, Kenji Goto.

The video was released late Saturday and shows an orthodox Muslim man with a British accent beheading the non-Muslim, ergo infidel, but its authenticity could not yet be confirmed by the Associated  Press.

Japan's deputy foreign minister, Yasuhide Nakayama told the press yesterday that Japan's efforts to free the hostage were "in a state of deadlock."

Fox News National Security Analyst, KT McFarland spoke about the failed trading of the hostages for Sajida al-Rishawi, a terrorist imprisoned in Jordan for her role in the murder of 60 Jordanians in 2005. "You can't trade, you can't negotiate with terrorists, you can't pay ransom for hostages," said McFarland. "This is the new normal in the region and they have now got the momentum."

Kenji Goto

She said that we know there are more hostages being held by ISIS, including an American woman, and that ISIS is going to try making deals, but she believes that we need to "switch the momentum, seize the momentum and what we in the West must say, the Americans, the British, the Japanese, anybody else who has hostages who have been beheaded or who are still being held, we should say 'no more ransom; no more negotiations; no more terrorist swaps for hostages. Here's the new deal: we are going to put money into a pool, we're going to raise $200 million and we're going to use that money as a bounty on your heads.'" 

I think she has a good idea here. Nothing is going to stop them, and no Muslim is going to come forward unless there's enough money involved to make it worth their while.

And while we're at it, can we not do any further deals with Taliban terrorists and American traitors?




Tweet

Obama al-Jazeera bin Lyin

How different is Al-Jazeera's whitewashing of Islamic barbarism from the Obama administration's? Answer: as different as identical twins.

Al-Jazeera America began by pretending it would cover the news honestly and in depth, but it apparently has as much depth as the snake oil salesman, Al Jazeera Gore, who sold them the slot in 2013 from Current.

The National Review obtained an email that directed Al Jazeera's propagandist "reporters" to not use terms such as "jihad," Islamist," and "terrorist." A top executive for the company, Carlos Van Meek, wrote to the New York and Washington newsrooms about how words can become problematic and also said, "One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter."

"Freedom fighter" shoots unarmed cop

Or "activist," if you work for CNN, as Christiane Amanpour called the Charlie Hebdo terrorists who massacred the staff at the newspaper. 

Scum buckets who kill children, behead journalists and others while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" are not freedom fighters. The children and journalists they kill are not in any way compromising their freedom. They are terrorists, and Islamic terrorists to be clear. The people who killed 3000 Americans and others on 911 were not freedom fights or militants; they were terrorists, of the Islamic kind.

Van Meek, who fits his name, said we should call terrorists "militants," or "fighters." He said that calling them extremists is forbidden. "Do not use the term Islamist," he said, because it's a "simplistic label."

Van Meek's level of political correctness has reached a point of pandering to Islamic terrorists. Al Jazeera is a champion at pandering--before they pandered in America, they pandered to Osama bin Laden and his terrorists of the Islamic kind. 

But don't fret, patriots, Al Jazeera has about as many prime-time viewers (18,000) as an Al Sharpton anti-white march.

So what about Obama and the boys on the left? Well, they're trying to convince us that Jordan's plan to swap Sajida al-Rishawi the terrorist, for Muath al-Kaseasbeh, the Jordanian pilot, is not the same as the Bergdahl trade last year. 

Bergdahl, a deserter at best, and a traitor at worst, was traded for the release of 5 Taliban terrorists at worst, and Islamic terrorists at best from Gitmo. 

Eric Schultz from the State Department made the case that the Taliban is not a terrorist group but an "armed insurgency." This Obama butt-boy claimed that "we don't pay ransom, we don't give concessions to terrorist organizations." So by this logic, the Taliban cannot be a terrorist organization because we made a concession. That's what we call an argument from fallacy:

We only make concessions with non-terrorist organizations.
We made concessions with the Taliban.
Therefore, the Taliban is a non-terrorist organization.

What we need to consider, in order to determine whether or not the Taliban is a terrorist organization, is our observations and the answers to the following questions:

1. If the Taliban was designated a terrorist organization during the Obama administration in 2010, and identified Hakimullah Mehsud and Wali ur-Rehman as specially designated global terrorists, has anything changed to declassify the Taliban as terrorists?

2. Does the killing of 141 people, 132 of them children at a Peshawar school by the Taliban, qualify them as terrorists?

3. Does the use of Improvised Explosive Devices, used to indiscriminately kill human beings, qualify the users of such devices (i.e., the Taliban) as terrorists?

If you still think the Taliban is merely an "armed insurgency," you might be a lberal.

Tweet

Islamic State Threatens Obama--Vows to Make USA a Muslim Province

In a new grisly beheading video, ISIS threatened our so-called president and said it would make our country into a Muslim province. But no worries--the Islamic State isn't Islamic so they would likely screw it up and make us into an Amish state, or maybe a Jewish state.

The dickwad in the video says they will kill Jordanian and Japanese hostages if the hostage held in Jordan is not freed. 

That isn't a girdle

Who is this Muslim, you ask. Her name is Sajida al-Rishawi, aka "sister of the Caliphate" as she is called by ISIS. She was sentenced to death in 2006 but a Jordanian moratorium on the death sentence saved her terrorist butt. She admitted her role in the deaths of 57 innocent people at the Amman hotels. ISIS wants her to be released. She has been incarcerated for 9 years.

The dirtbag behind the Kurdish hostage in the video, hidden beneath a balaclava, spoke in Arabic, the language of the Koran, and said, "Know, oh Obama, that we will reach America. Know also that we will cut off your head in the White House, and transform America into a Muslim Province."

Barack Hussein Obama did not actually reply, but if he did, he might say this:

"Know ye, oh ISIS mujahedeen. You need not fret and frown over my residence in the White House for I am personally transforming America into a Muslim Province, but it's going to take some time. I ask that you be patient, but if you have to cut off a couple of heads along the way, you have my blessings, Inshallah."

If the American people, the patriots I mean, could reply, we might say:

"Know ye, oh scumbags in rags, that we will not rest until each and every one of you is killed, put in a pigskin sack, and buried upside-down with bacon in your mouth and a Koran shoved up your nether regions.

"You might kill some of us, but you cannot kill us all, and you cannot kill our spirit and our resolve. If you think you can take over the United States of America, Molon Labe, assholes."

We don't hide our faces

I think we have all reached a point where we know who the enemy is, and it isn't simply radical terrorists. They are radical Muslim terrorists who strictly follow the teachings of the Koran. It's time to stop lying to the American public and pretend that Islam isn't the problem or that the Islamic State has hijacked Islam. 

Everything al-Baghdadi is doing would be duplicated by the prophet of Islam, Muhammed, even though al-Baghdadi has a PhD in Islamic studies and Muhammed was an illiterate, Jew-hating, slave-owning, thieving, pedophile. What is al-Baghdadi doing any differently?


Tweet