Showing posts with label Think Progress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Think Progress. Show all posts

Saturday, April 6, 2019

UPDATE: Muffet McGraw Notre Dame women's basketball head coach will not hire men

Photo: AP
UPDATE: Notre Dame women's basketball lost to Baylor in the finals and McGraw is now looking for a few good women.

Notre Dame women's basketball head coach, Muffet McGraw, spoke in a recent interview with  Think Progress, and explained her position on why she will never hire another biological male assistant coach. She believes that women can do more to help each other.

Think Progress asked her the question on hiring she emphatically said "no." She has had an all-female staff for the past seven years.

“Women need the opportunity. They deserve the opportunity,” she said.

On Thursday, McGraw was asked about her recent comments.

"Did you know that the Equal Rights Amendment was introduced in 1967 and it still hasn't passed?" she replied. "We need 38 states to agree that discrimination on the basis of sex is unconstitutional. We've had a record number of women running for office and winning, and still we have 23 percent of the House and 25 percent of the Senate."

Well, historically she's a bit off. 

The Equal Rights Amendment designed to guarantee equal rights for all Americans regardless of sex, and sought to end legal distinctions between men and women was introduced to Congress in 1921. It had support from middle-class women but many women of the working class opposed the amendment because it suggested that employed women needed special protection regarding working conditions and employment hours.

With the Women's Movement of the 1960s, ERA gained support and was re-introduced by Rep. Martha Griffiths (D-MI) in 1971. The House approved the amendment in October of that year, and on March 22, 1972, the Senate approved it. Now all the amendment needed was for 38 states to ratify it and "boom," it would be law as specified in Article V of the U.S. Constitution.

But by 1977, the amendment got only 35 of the required 38 state legislature votes to ratify it, and it had bipartisan support.

Phyllis Schlafly mobilized conservative women to oppose the amendment because she believed it would harm women in cases of child custody and alimony support, and it would leave them open for the military draft.

However, it wasn't only conservatives who opposed the amendment. Labor feminists were also against its passage because they too believed it would eliminate the protection of women in the work force.

Five of the 35 states that signed on with the amendment [ID, KY, NE, TN, and SD] voted to revoke their original ratification. 

In fact, in 1960, the Democratic National Committee rejected the proposal after the AFL-CIO, ACLU, the American Federation of Teachers, Americans for Democratic Action, American Nurse's Association, and other equally liberal-minded organizations, were dead set against the amendment.

But to listen to argument in the media, you'd never know that ERA has been opposed by the liberal left, the people who supposedly fight for women's rights.


"Girls are socialized to know when they come out, gender rules are already set. Men run the world. Men have the power. Men make the decisions. It's always the man that is the stronger one,” she said, not taking into account that women are the majority of voters.

This isn't an argument against McGraw hiring only women. That works for both genders and it's understandable from her perspective.

However, to say that women basically don't have equal rights as men simply dismisses the current discrimination laws.

The Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Family Housing Act have guaranteed people equal rights to all regardless of sex. The main reason that ERA has been difficult to pass is because of actual biological differences between the sexes and the fear of actually losing some of their rights and social outcomes [e.g., child custody].

So, by all means Ms. McGraw, don't hire men if you believe that women understand women's basketball and the players better than men. But please don't have women play the victim--we've got Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for that.

Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Wednesday, September 20, 2017

ESPN freaking out over Hill's racist attack

ESPN host Jemele Hill called President Trump a "white supremacist" and people are getting sick and tired of being blamed and labeled for being white. Now the sports network is in "crisis mode" according to a recent report.

The news website Think Progress reported that "a top executive at ESPN" ordered Hill to go home and she was seen in the parking lot when production meetings for her show are usually scheduled to take place.

On Thursday, Think Progress posted that ESPN tried to replace Hill with another black host for her show on Wednesday night. Naturally, ESPN denied the claim and told other media outlets that it "never asked for any other anchors to do last night's show. Period."

Whenever you hear the word 'period' you can be fairly certain that what preceded it was a lie. 

Think Progress hit back Friday with a follow-up piece reporting that the sports network is in "crisis mode" and its statement was "highly misleading."

According to the website, Hill was sent home on Wednesday morning and her co-host, Michael Smith, refused to do the show without her. So ESPN tried to reach out to other anchors and check their availability to host the edition of "SportsCenter" that is typically anchored by Hill and Smith--but they eventually decided to allow the show to go on without sidelining Hill.

It all began earlier in the week when liberal Hill tweeted anti-Trump statements.
"Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has surrounded himself with other white supremacists."
She didn't provide other names.

Next, she called him "the most ignorant, offensive president of my lifetime." And also called him a "bigot" and "unqualified and unfit to be president." Then said, "If he were not white, he never would have been elected."

The exact opposite of Barack Obama's situation and lack of experience.

Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said that she thinks Hill's comments are a "fireable offense" but added that it isn't her job to make that sort of decision. 

Trump himself had to get into the act after his ego was assaulted by Hill's words and asked ESPN for an apology. He is not holding his breath.
"ESPN is paying a really big price for its politics (and bad programming). People are dumping it in RECORD numbers. Apologize for untruth!"
Trump really needs to lay off the exclamation points!

Hill stands behind her words but regrets painting ESPN as an anti-white, bigoted and leftist media outlet. She refuses to apologize.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday, President Trump is attending a luncheon honoring black leaders.

Trump is a New York businessman. He works with all races and doesn't give a fig the race or political party of the people he works with--he only cares if they can advance his needs.

Calling Trump a white supremacist is either naive or racist in itself, and that's the problem with the Democrats--they see everything in terms of race, which, in itself, is racist because they shoot before they know the target.


The Mayor Who Cannot Name the Murderers

There are occasions when a politician is required to say what happened. September 11 is one of them. Nearly 3,000 people were murdered by Is...