Tehran's top cop airstruck and is out of luck

According to multiple reports exploding across X and other platforms today (March 7, 2026), Brigadier General Abbas-Ali Mohammadian, commander of Tehran's police force (فرمانده انتظامی تهران بزرگ), has reportedly been blown to smithereens in joint U.S.-Israeli airstrikes hammering Iran.

These claims are blasting out from pro-Israel accounts, anti-regime voices, and freedom-loving patriots on X, Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit, complete with those glorious "ELIMINATED" graphics and zero sympathy for a guy accused of ordering the slaughter of protesters. 

We're talking the 2022 Mahsa Amini uprising and the fresh waves of unrest where his forces allegedly racked up hundreds (some say thousands) of dead and injured Iranians just trying to breathe free.

The man was already sanctioned up the wazoo by the U.S., EU, and others for human rights abuses tied to crushing demonstrations. Before Tehran, he ran the show in Alborz province, overseeing more of the same violent crackdowns that left bodies in the streets.

This fits the bigger picture of escalating U.S. and Israeli operations targeting Iranian military brass, security heavies, and command structure, IRGC bigwigs, defense minister-level figures, and higher have been in the crosshairs too.

Posts are framing it as straight-up justice or good riddance, with a lot of folks tying it to the regime's collapsing grip after massive leadership losses. 

But here's the latest skivvy: As of this moment, nothing confirmed from major Western outlets, Iranian state media, or official channels on Mohammadian specifically. 

Tehran has admitted heavy hits from the strikes and big casualties among top ranks, but they're mum on this one. In hot war zones like this, social media moves at warp speed, sometimes with fog-of-war misinformation, so treat these reports as preliminary and explosive until rock-solid independent verification drops.

If official word or more details break (and in this fast-moving chaos, it could happen any minute), the picture will sharpen quick. Stay sharp, folks.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Tweet

BULLETIN: Fake report from Iran says IDF spokesperson and "mass resignation" goes viral

IDF Spokesman Daniel Hagari in Tel Aviv media briefing Oct. 16, 2023

Iran is as believable as the claim that a certain female Vice President is a brilliant orator. 

IDF Spokesman Daniel Hagari and his unit are unperturbed by the balderdash being spewed by Iran's Ministry of Bull Crap stating that several high ranking Israeli officials have announced their retirement from the IDF in spite of the war in Gaza. The reports were made on Israel's right-wing Channel 14 and was immediately reported on Iranian media.

[H/T Jerusalem Post.]

Channel 14’s Tamir Morag reported on Sunday night that several high-ranking officials in the IDF spokesperson’s unit announced their resignations around the same time amid the war.

Among them was “number two in the IDF spokesperson’s unit, Col. Shlomit Muller-Butbul,” who, according to the report, “is in the resignation process.”

“She was supposed to leave the week that the war broke out, but then, because the war broke out, she stayed a little,” an IDF source told The Jerusalem Post.

The Channel 14 report also claimed that “Moran Katz, a civilian employee of the IDF in the spokesperson’s unit at the colonel rank, quit after things didn’t work out ‘professionally and personally.’”

In reality, according to the source close to the matter, “Moran completed her contractual obligations and did not extend [her contract.]” This after over four years in her position.

Col. Tzofiya Moshkovitz was also reported as having resigned – but that's completely false.

“Tzofiya isn’t leaving at all,” the source said. “She didn’t agree to resign and is far from resigning. There is no one replacing her, and she isn’t replacing anyone. This is an outright lie.”

The report also claimed that IDF spokesperson to foreign media Col. Richard Hecht is resigning – this is true. However, the report claimed that he resigned after someone was positioned to “oversee him,” which was never the case.

Col. Merav Granot Stoller, also reported as having resigned, has simply “reached retirement age,” the source explained. "Even that wasn’t agreed upon; she simply reached the relevant age."

"Because we know the truth, we aren't phased by this report, truly," the source concluded.

Morag, the author of the report, claimed, in a post on X clarifying the report, that the media "avoids dealing with these issues because they eat out of the IDF spokesperson’s unit’s hands and depend on it."

This is completely untrue: the Israeli media uses plates and utensils to eat.

“The dependence of military reporters on the IDF spokesperson’s unit is a unique and very unhealthy phenomenon that does not exist in other fields of coverage,” Morag claimed.

The false report went viral on different media sources and social media and even I was initially taken in but decided to do a check of the story.

Despite being false, the report has been shared vigorously on posts throughout social media sources, including Reddit, Threads, X, and Facebook.

The report has also been posted on London-based Arab media source Middle East Eye, which has over 1.6 million followers on Instagram, as well as Turkish news website TRT World, which has 2.1 million followers. [Brain Flushings . . . not so much.]

Predictably, after the fake news hit social media, the game of "Telephone" went into effect and people began altering the actual story claiming the resignations had to do with the war in Gaza.

Some have also falsely reported, such as Al Jazeera, as they so often do, that IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari himself has resigned from his position. The Al Jazeera rag since retracted their statement after tens of thousands had read it and never got to read the retraction, as is usually the case.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is still apparently alive, much to the dismay of the Democratic Party.

Tweet

Uncovered: CNN contributor praised Hitler

Freelance contributor Adeel Raja has written scores of articles for CNN. However, it was recently discovered on social media that Raja, in a now-deleted tweet wrote: "the world today needs a Hitler." This was just one of several pro-Hitler messages this anti-Semite posted, but he remains on Twitter while Trump does not.

During the 2014 FIFA World Cup, Raja wrote: "The only reason I am supporting Germany in the finals - Hitler was a German and he did good with those Jews!" 

He last wrote for CNN on Sept. 16, 2020. But he still lists his affiliation with CNN on LinkedIn, and CNN doesn't seem to have a problem with that.

"Hail Hitler!" he wrote the following day. Twitter users shared screenshots of the messages.

CNN "Bürgermeisterin"  Matt Dornic [just kidding] told the Washington Examiner that he "never heard" of Raja, but he heard of Hitler and he's "looking into it."

Raja's anti-Semitic comments come amid unprovoked rocket attacks by Hamas at Israeli citizens. Hamas has thus far fired over 3,000 rockets, paid for by Iran, at Israel, and most have been destroyed by the Iron Dome defense system. Israel has now responded in defense of its people and have killed top Hamassholes in retaliation.

"In response to HUNDREDS of rockets in the last 24 hours, the IDF has struck a number of significant terror targets and terror operatives across the Gaza Strip, marking our largest strike since 2014," the Israeli Defense Forces wrote on Twitter. "We are currently striking more terror targets in Gaza."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Hamas that there will be more retaliation where that came from.

"We'll do whatever it takes to restore order and quiet, and the security of our people and deterrence," Netanyahu said on "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "We're trying to degrade Hamas' terrorist abilities and to degrade their will to do this again."

Meanwhile, CNN still sucks and continues to put out the garbage.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Harvard grad refuses to take responsibility for her words, guess who she blames

A Harvard graduate, Claire Janover, posted a video online Wednesday in which she says that she lost her job with the accounting firm Deloitte, after stupidly saying in a previous video that she would "stab" anyone who told her "all lives matter."

So for Janover, it's over for her at the prestigious company, but she apparently takes no responsibility for her hateful word, and is oblivious to the notion that words really matter and have consequences. Harvard should give her a refund because they have taught her nothing of true importance, obviously.

“Standing up for Black Lives Matter put me in a place online to be seen by millions of people,” Janover says in the tearful new video. As a result, “The job that I’d worked really hard to get and meant a lot to me has called me and fired me because of everything.”

No, young idiot. They fired you because your words could hurt their brand. They were smart; you, not so much.

Janover also says supporters of Trump shared in the blame for her losing the gig because nothing could ever be the fault of a Harvard graduate who threatens people's lives over their First Amendment rights.

“Trump supporters took my job away from me,” she stupidly says. “I have gotten death threats, rape threats, violent threats. It was OK, but now my future’s entirely compromised because Trump supporters have decided to come for my life.”

Well okay; death threats and rape threats are disgusting and place those who say such things in the same category as Ms. Janover. [May we call her "Ms" without clarifying to which genders she identifies?]

The graduate with a degree in government and psychology claims Deloitte let her go despite a company claim of standing “against systemic bias, racism and unequal treatment.”

So badmouthing the company had nothing to do with her firing, it was all about bad orange man's supporters. Sounds like mental calisthenics.

She also warns Trump supporters and Deloitte that she won’t be defeated by her personal defeat--something she learned to say in Psych 101.

“I’m too strong for you. I’m too strong for any of you ‘All Lives Matter,’ racist Trump supporters,” she says. “It sucks. But it doesn’t suck as much as systemic racism. And I’m not going to stop using my platform to advocate for it.”

She did not clarify which systems of racism she referenced. The Black Lives Matter crowd tends to keep that claim rather vague.

“I’m sorry, Deloitte, that you can’t see that,” she adds, taking another swipe at the company that preemptively released her in order to avoid swipes from employees who would likely make trouble for the company. “That you were cowardice [sic] enough to fight somebody who’s going to make an indelible change in the world and is going to have an impact.”

'Cowardice enough?' 

Janover’s LinkedIn account had listed her as an “incoming government and public business service analyst” at Deloitte, according to the New York Post.

In her original viral video, Janover had issued a warning to anyone with “the nerve, the sheer entitled Caucasity to say, ‘all lives matter.’” As if being white is somehow evil and white people are to blame for our immutable melanin levels.

“I’ma stab you,” she brilliantly said. “I’ma stab you, and while you’re struggling and bleeding out, I’ma show you my paper cut and say, ‘My cut matters, too.’”

Now can you see why Deloitte ditched her? She's really not smart, on so many levels.

She later claimed the clip was “clearly” an “analogous joke,” [emphasis on ANALogous].

“For legal reasons this is a joke,” she added after the fact. “And people are like reporting me for domestic terrorism, tagging the FBI, Harvard, Cambridge police.”

Maybe, like, you know, that's just another like, reason Deloitte sees you as trouble.

Your degree in government and psychology apparently taught you as much about those subjects as Alexandria Obviously-Comatose's degree taught her about economics.

Yes, Claire, all lives matter. Now you can go protest and riot at all hours and not worry about missing work.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Trump threatens to 'strongly regulate' or shut down social media platforms

President Trump became POTUS because of the way the media treats conservatives, libertarians and Republicans. He doesn't take any guff from reporters and seems to enjoy scuffling with them. But let's not pretend he never says things on Twitter that would best be left unsaid. If you think he's never wrong to say some of those things, then there's nothing I can say that would convince you otherwise.

On Wednesday morning, Trump threatened to "strongly regulate" or actually shut down Twitter and other social media platforms after Twitter "fact-checked" him for the first time. I used scare quotes around the term because their fact-checker needs to be fact-checked as he got things terribly wrong.

There's no question in the mind of any sentient Republican that social media platforms act as publishers when it comes to their postings and basically work as Democrat shills for the left--this is obvious to anyone with more than two brain neurons to rub together.

President Trump took to Twitter to attack Twitter:

Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. We saw what they attempted to do, and failed, in 2016. We can’t let a more sophisticated version of that….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)

Trump said social media platforms are silencing “conservative voices,” a legitimate charge that has been leveled against other platforms like Facebook.

Trump later added:

“We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. Social Media. Clean up your act, NOW!!!!”

No U.S. President has the power to unilaterally shut down a company, and that's a good thing. If it was true that a president could have this power, Obama would have probably shut down Parler in a heartbeat.

The whole thing began when the President sent out a tweet claiming that instituting a mail-in ballot system for voting in the U.S. would lead to widespread voter fraud.

Twitter attached a fact-check message to Trump’s tweet allowing users to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots.” The link leads to a fact-checking page that describes Trump’s mail-in voting claim as “unsubstantiated.”

But the facts about mail-in ballots isn't as clear as Twitter and others would have us believe.

An article in the National Review discusses how the wholesale use of mail ballots are not closely scrutinized. "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud," they wrote, explaining that this was "the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker," both Democrats.

The article continues: "In 2012, a Miami–Dade County Grand Jury issued a public report recommending that Florida change its law to prohibit 'ballot harvesting' unless the ballots are 'those of the voter and members of the voter’s immediate family.' "Once that ballot is out of the hands of the elector, we have no idea what happens to it,” they pointed out. 'The possibilities are numerous and scary.'”

But while it's important to note that President Trump makes a good case for in-person voting, especially since people are able to get out of the house more, he is not correct about being able to shut down private businesses. In other words, he will need a different line of attack if he want to change the way Twitter and others operate.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Wuhan Coronavirus daredevil crashes and burns with the virus

Like a female version of the late Evel Knievel, Ireland Tate, a 21-year-old Tennessee woman tried to cheat the Wuhan Coronavirus by exposing herself to the possibility of contracting the deadly virus. [H/T New York Post]

With sheer guts and what is perceived to be a low IQ, Tate put herself out there in crowds amongst other idiots who may have been infected with the virus. She simply did not take the pandemic seriously.

The barely legal Tate joked about not following instructions to stay home and practice social distancing. It isn't even known if she washed her hands or even bathed. As far as is known, she did not, I repeat, did not lick any toilet seats as some have done on Instagram.

But Tate fell sick, news station WZTV reported. Who'd a thunk?

In a social media video, the Nashville nincompoop told her followers that she is “aware that we’re supposed to be self-quarantining and social distancing” to “keep everyone safe” — but that she wasn’t worried. If she sadly succumbs to the virus, she will be in high contention for the Darwin Awards.

“Cool. I get it. I just don’t think that I’m going to get the virus,” Tate bragged in the video.

But just days later, the cockeyed optimist found herself suffering from symptoms associated with the dangerous virus and tested positive.

“It feels like someone is sitting on my chest at all times,” she said. “It’s really hard to breathe, I’ve coughed until my throat has bled.”

Tate said she probably got the virus from an infected buddy in her group of friends and she’s now warning other young people to stay home. 

But at least she didn't lick any toilet seats. Can we at least give her credit for that?

“While it may not be affecting you, you could be affecting someone’s grandma or grandpa or aunt or uncle or sister,” Tate told the outlet.

I would hope her friends and others didn't need to listen to her words of wisdom before taking precautions. 

Clearly, as science shows, the brain is almost, but not fully developed by age 21, but in Tate's case, she has a very long way to go.

I wish her a speedy and complete recovery and that she will grow up and smell the Starbucks.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.






Tweet

Chelsea Mishandler calls for military coup

Proudly displaying her stupidity

Chelsea Handler (aka Life's Mishandler; aka Miss Handler) has called for the military to overthrow the duly elected President Trump on Friday. It wasn't clear if she was referring to the United States military or the North Korean's.

It's no secret Life's Mishandler hates President Trump and the United States as she has made the opinion of her one existing brain neuron known in a tweet.

"To all the generals surrounding our idiot-in-chief . . . the longer U wait to remove him, the longer UR name will appear negatively in history," she wrote and actually believed that she spelled 'you' and 'your' correctly.

The hysterical comedian's comments were met with virulent negative responses by Americans who actually respect the office of the presidency and have, at minimum, a modicum of patriotism.

If Life's Mishandler (aka Chelsea Handler) thought about what she was asking the military to do, then she needs to be questioned by the Secret Service to determine if she has her own plan in mind for removing or harming our president.

One person tweeted:

"Man Chelsea. Do you think before you tweet? You really want the military to overthrow the President? Think about that for a moment."

The person was asking a lot of Miss Handler when suggesting that she think about the outcome of a military coup.

Of course there were those who agreed with the unfunny feminidiot. They generally comprise the same group of miscreants who suppress free speech at colleges where conservatives are scheduled to present their ideas--Ben Shapiro comes to mind.

Miss Handler posted a photo on Instagram on Thursday wearing a tee-shirt that read: "Sorry about our president" in many different languages, not just limited to Korean, Pashtun, Chinese, Russian and Arabic.

The photo caption read: "The shirt I wear now when I travel. Thanks to whomever sent it to me."

It was likely sent to her by Kim Jong Un or Putin.

And what is it about some people named "Chelsea"?


Tweet

Gray Lady goofed again--corrects editorial about Palin, sort of

The paper of record (LMAO) New York Times, had to correct their Fake News editorial in which they stated as fact a debunked load of garbage that Jared Loughner, the schizophrenic who shot Gabby Giffords in 2011, was inspired to do so by a map circulated by Sarah Palin showing a bullseye.

The editorial titled "America's Lethal Politics," was posted on Wednesday and social media went bonkers. 

The editorial read, in part:

"Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin's political action committee circulated a map targeting electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs."

The Times ran the editorial after Wednesday's shooting at a GOP congressional baseball practice, leaving 4 wounded, including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and Matt Mika.

The rag posted a correction at the foot of the editorial online, rather than prominently posting it at the top:

Correction: June 15, 2017

An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established.

Loughner's home was searched by authorities after the shooting and documents were found showing he had planned the shooting in advance.

"I planned ahead," a signed note left in a safe by Loughner read. "My assassination."

A letter was also found in the safe that Giffords wrote to Loughner on August 30, 2007, thanking him for attending a "Congress on Your Corner" event, according to an FBI affidavit.

The FBI said at the time of the shooting that Loughner had targeted Giffords, while The Times keeps targeting the truth. Now both sides are calling them out for being Fake News.

A tweet by New York Post editor John Podhoretz said, "The NYT editorial falsely claims Loughner shot Giffords dueto a target on a photo. It's not yet 11. They can change it. Let's see."

Even far left-wing Mother Jones senior editor Ben Dreyfull tweeted, "This NYT editorial is, in fact, stupid. Palin didn't make that loon shoot Gabby Giffords. "Rhetoric" didn't make today's whacko shoot either."

So maybe the left is slowly coming around and seeing that the real blame for these horrific acts need to be placed squarely on those who actually perpetrate them.

But I doubt it. Give it a few weeks and we'll see.


Tweet

One happy happy religion

"Kumbaya m'lord, Kumbaya . . . "

Islamagood, Pahkeestahn -- Ah, the sound of students voicing their love for their religion. Chanting slogans at a rally, supporting their love of sharia and its call for the upholding of blasphemy laws. The photo above of the sweet munchkins was taken on March 8, 2017. They are calling for someone, anyone to be killed.

And just this week, three bloggers, guys like me, were ordered held while blasphemy charges are being investigated by kangaroo sharia officials.

Here's an oxymoron for you: an anti-terrorism court in Pakistan has put three online bloggers in the custody of a federal agency for a week in order to conclude whether or not they committed blasphemy and be formally killed to death, or maybe just whipped until there's no skin left on their backs.

The Islamic punishment for not going along with the program is death. That's what countries under theocratic rule do--anything the leader wants them to do.

Pakistan's Federal Investigation Agency (aka FIA; aka Kangaroo Court) arrested the three free-thinkers this week as part of an ongoing crackdown on suspects who refuse to fall into lockstep and post things online that express their beliefs.

Heads may roll (literally) if authorities investigating the laptops seized from the trio say stuff like: 'Mohammad is a pedophile;" or: 'Religion of Peace--more like religion of pieces;' or: 'There is no such thing as Islamophobia--it's a made up term to shut people up who have different opinions.'

As stated above, Pakistan's anti-blasphemy laws carry the death penalty or life in prison for insulting the terrorist-prophet, Mohammad. Thus far, nobody has been put to death, but it's just a matter of time until someone's head is struck off by another guy named Mohammad.

The latest crackdown on saying truthful things about the prophet of Islam was launched by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (no relation to Omar) when he ordered his henchmen to do what needed to be done to rid social media of any anti-Islam content posted by non-believers in Pakistan.

Imam  bin Flippen-off

The new Sharif in town directed authorities to root out those responsible for exercising their desire to express an opinion contrary to Islamic teachings and bring them to swift justice. 

An example of a contrary opinion of something, say, written in the Koran, might be: "Don't kill them wherever you find them;" or, "Muslim, there's a Jew hiding behind that tree; kiss him."

The crackdown has alarmed rights groups. Five bloggers critical of Pakistan's military and spy agency mysteriously vanished in January and were eventually returned to their families. They accused Pakistani security institutions of being behind the kidnapping. 

Soon after they had gone missing, radical clerics and orthodox Muslims went on Islamic TV interviews and Islamic talk shows where they accused the bloggers of committing blasphemy through online activities.

The five free-thinkers fled Pakistan because they valued the continuity of the bodies they were born with. 

Even accusing someone of blasphemy can provoke the more religious of Muslims to kill the one suspected of it. That's because for some people, it's fun to be able to kill someone, get away with it, and be praised by what may be a hot woman under that cloth cover.

A provincial governor, a federal minister and members of the infidel minority communities have been just a few who have been killed in Pakistan for simply seeking reforms in the blasphemy laws, or for being wrongly accused of insulting an inanimate ideology that can feel nothing by an insult.

Pakistani officials have contacted Facebook and Twitter, asking them to identify Pakistanis outside the country who are posting anti-terrorist (aka Islamic extremist) material so the government can bring them back to Pakistan and bring them to Islamic justice.

In fact, Nisar Ali Khan, Federal Interior Minister, announced this month that a Facebook dhimmi delegation will visit the lovely country of Pakistan to discuss the issue with them. Hopefully the Facebook crowd will not be sharia-compliant and allow those bloggers to live.




Tweet

ISIS threatens: 'Stop deleting our accounts'

We're looking for a few good sheep

ISIS is upset over their social media accounts. The accounts are being systematically deleted by the social network administrators and it's twisting their skivvies in a knot.

One group of scumcrumpets took to an encrypted Telegram channel to cry over the constant deletion of their propaganda channels. They also mocked intel agencies, accusing them of infiltrating ISIS channels to obtain "real and credible information about the Islamic State."

Well that's what intel is supposed to do--to mock them means they're being successful and that's a good thing.

The idiots wrote: "We are not dumb nor stupid not to know that you are monitoring our Channels! . . . Reporting our Channels to be Disabled cuts off your source of information therefore rendering you useless and naive," the post reads.

I have a feeling that people who think that by blowing themselves to smithereens they are doing God's work, are not all that intelligent. Our intel agencies know what they're doing.

The dummies also suggested that without news and propaganda reports from them, the social media platforms would have a harder time generating revenue. What they're saying, in other words, "Please don't shut us out--it's good for you too."

"Reporting our Channels to be Disabled means You will run out of Business because Our Channels are Your Sources of income," the post says ungrammatically.

Twitter announced last year that it had shut down 360,000 accounts that were promoting or threatening terrorist acts, and who knows how many pro-Trump tweeters.

YouTube and Facebook also deleted thousands of videos and social media accounts promoting jihad.

Telegram, the 'app of choice' by the Islamic barbarians, created an ISIS 'watch-bot' that tracks the number of ISIS-affiliated channels and bots removed every month.

ISIS, however, has created a bot that generates random email addresses, temporary mobile phone numbers and pin codes required by many social media accounts for sign-up. They've also resorted to 'invite only' groups on Facebook to avoid deletion for several weeks before being discovered.

On Twitter, the jihadis set their tweets to protected viewing, which only allows 'vetted' followers (aka fellow scumcrumpets) to see their posts.


Tweet

Turkey arrests 1,656 social media users

Istanbul -- Authorities have formally arrested 1,656 people over the past six months for allegedly supporting terrorist organizations or insulting government officials on social media. They are also investigating over 10,000 others, according to the Interior Ministry.

Turkey does not have the same rights that we sort of still have here, as presented in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and freedom of speech or expression isn't protected. Of course, with the way liberals are trying to call all free speech 'hate speech,' it may merely be a matter of time when the U.S. will resemble other European or even Middle Eastern countries.

In a statement released by the Interior Ministry, it said that legal action had been taken against 3,710 people identified by police. Of those arrested, 1,203 were released on probation, 767 were released and 84 are still being held.

The charges include: provoking hatred among the people; praising terrorist organizations; disseminating terrorist propaganda; openly declaring allegiance to terrorist groups; insulting statements (such as: "Erdogan's breath smells like a bicycle seat on a hot summer day") and targeting the indivisibility of the state or safety of citizens.

Personally, I have no problem how they're dealing with issues regarding actual terrorism or those groups involved in it, but it looks as if Turkish leadership wants to take away all rights to free expression.

Turkey declared a state of emergency after a failed coup in July. Thousands of people were detained, and tens of thousands of public servants were purged over alleged ties to outlawed groups.

Human rights groups and Western governments have expressed concern over the crackdown, which some believe is targeting political opponents and critics, much like American college campuses target straight white conservative students, free speech and Israel. But Ankara claims the action they're taking are necessary precautions in the fight against terrorism across the country.

As global immigration soars, we will likely see more crime and acts of terrorism in the future.


Tweet

Lena Dunham apologizes, sort of

Mentally impaired "actress" Lena Dunham is taking back her comment she made on her podcast "Women of the Hour" in which she said: " . . . I still haven't had an abortion, but I wish I had." 

The reason she's taking it back is obviously due to the huge backlash she received from normal human beings who, even if they don't oppose abortion, see it as something not to wish for and viewed her remark as offensive.

Dunham explained in an Instagram post that her "latest podcast episode was meant to tell a multifaceted story about reproductive choice in America."

She hoped that by using a big word, 'multifaceted' people would be fooled into believing she is intelligent.

"I truly hope a distasteful joke on my part won't diminish the amazing work of all the women who participated [in the podcast]. My words were spoken from a sort of 'delusional girl' persona I often inhabit, a girl who careens between wisdom and ignorance . . . and it didn't translate. That's my fault. I would never, ever intentionally trivialize the emotional and physical challenges of terminating a pregnancy."

But she did, so that's a lie.

And her cop-out is to pretend she has multiple personality? "Delusional girl"? 

No wonder this woman was big on Hillary Clinton. They're cut from the same pitchfork.

She's no better than the MTV racists and sexists who attack all white men and after the backlash say it was a joke.

Go to hell, Dunham and MTV .  .  .  just joking.

Tweet

Twitter censoring conservatives, one huge tcot quits

Conservatives are what make liberals possible. Twitter doesn't have the brains to understand this and now some top conservatives on Twitter are packing it in, never to return to this social media platform. 

With their one-time super stock taking a dive into the toilet, you might think they would be smart enough to realize how stupid they are. But stupid is blind to stupidity or else they wouldn't be stupid.

Adam Baldwin (the conservative Baldwin brother) has left Twitter never to return, he says, now that they have created what they laughingly call a "Trust and Safety Council."

Composed of radical leftist pant-loads, the purpose of this council is to police the "twitterverse" and shut up thoughts they don't like.  Since these scumcrumpets came to kick the First Amendment in the groin, several prominent conservatives have had their accounts suspended or "de-verified."

Adam Baldwin, current star of TNT's The Lost Ship, told Independent Journal Review that Twitter is punishing users for "offensive speech."

The purpose of the First Amendment is to allow for speech we both like or find offensive, and if we find it so, more speech is the answer, not less. 

"I've had enough. Twitter is dead to me," Baldwin said. "I'm going to find greener pastures elsewhere and I'm not coming back."

As much as liberals say they hate capitalism, ergo conservatives, they need us in order to have the ability to have the luxury to be liberals. If Twitter loses enough conservatives, their policies and libtard behavior will have to change or there will be no Twitter. 

You gotta love the name: "Trust and Safety Council." They don't trust anyone but their own, and safety from opposing viewpoints is not safety at all--it's called ignorance.


Tweet

Hillary to come out and say it tomorrow

Hillary, of the Clinton line, plans to announce her turn as absolute monarch of the United States on Sunday. She'll be doing it on social media which, for her, is a good idea as it affords her the opportunity to delete that which she doesn't want the American public to see.

After the announcement, don't be surprised if she goes ahead and deletes her entire account--it's how she rolls.

Hopefully, the announcement will be done on Twitter. It's hard to listen to her drone on and on with lie after lie in that flat voice of hers. She talks as if she's trying to make her own echoes in a large stadium. But she can't do that on Twitter in 140 characters and no sound.

Many conservatives may even choose to block her on Twitter and report her for nuisance tweeting or harassment.

It seems as if the presidency has become like a sporting event. Instead of saying, "I was at the stadium when Derek Jeter hit the game-ending single at his last "at bat" of his career;" you might have said, "I voted in the election that the first black man, a devout communist, had won, unfortunately." (If you're a liberal, you`d probably word that a bit differently and you'd be more likely to be reading Slate than Brain Flushings.)

In the horrifying event that Hillary actually gets elected, you could one day say to your grand kids that you were alive when America's first, extremely white woman was elected to the monarchy. By then, however, you might have to tell them this in Farci.

Hillary`s win would be a first in political history, and that's what sports is all about--the statistics is the historical side of sports. Being the first woman, black man, Muslim, or gay, (but never a gay Muslim) would be historical. People want to be part of that nonsense because it makes them feel that they too are a part of the history that took place.

President Obama, on the other hand, is meeting with Cuba's supreme dictator, the very communist Raul Castro. This will be the first time in 50 years an American president has met with a Cuban commie dictator, an event Obama calls "historical." It should bring back fond memories of his parents, both of the same political leanings as Raul.

Gee, isn't it great to be able to announce to the world that you're making history? I mean, how cool is Barry?

Do you think he'll wear his "Che" tee shirt?














Tweet

Girl 9, shaves head to support friend with cancer: barred from school

You've heard the expression "you can't make this stuff up," well you need to hear this one.

The semi-prestigious Caprock Academy in Grand Junction, Colorado banned little 9 year old Kamryn Renfro from school because she shaved her head in support of her friend, Delaney, who's undergoing chemotherapy for cancer.

Wendy, Delaney's mom, said the school's move surprised her, but in a time in history where a kindergarten child chews a cookie into the shape of a pistol and is banned for that, nothing surprises me anymore. Wendy stated: "I didn't realize that hair was such an important aspect of a child at school. For a little girl to be really brave and want to shave her head in support of her friend, I thought that was a huge statement and it builds character in a child."

Privacy Piracy

You can't swing a cat without hitting someone on a cell phone, either on a call, texting, or listening to Lady Gaga singing something semi-annoying. It's surreal to see three or four people walking along, apparently having a schizophrenic episode, where each is talking to an invisible person, speaking out loud about such things like: who's dating whom, who's sleeping with whom, who's coming to the party at Tommy's tonight, what you think about Mary and Billy now that Mary is pregnant with Stevies child and Billy has just come out of the closet and his mother doesn't know it yet, and so on and so on. Then you realize these people who you thought were crazy, are all on cell phones using Blue Tooth techology and you have the epiphany that privacy has been pirated by our modern toys and past times.

Making a call was simple back then

Cell phones have come a long way since the days when they looked like military radios used to call in air strikes against the Luftwaffe. Not only are they sleek, thin, and light, they can play music, go online, text, take photos, do the math, store thousands of phone numbers and personal information, and even record messages. One thing that cell phones could do, that the cell phone companies didn't advertise so much, is their ability to physically track your whereabouts through an internal GPS (Global Positioning System) that is now accurate within three feet of your location.


But this is only one aspect of how our privacy has been pirated by others.

Facebook and other social media sites know more about you, in many ways, than your own family. But Facebook isn't Faceless, it's a site where people can read all about you, and other companies can learn about your preferences and shopping habits. This is also true with internet providers who can track your web address travels and share it with their advertisers. Flickr, the photography site owned by Yahoo, displays your personal photos, and if you don't secure your privacy on this site, it can be pirated by anyone coming across your location.


We complain about our lack of privacy, but it is we who give it away freely. We're the one putting out our information, and then we're surprised when someone steals it and uses it to steal even more from you.  

Post-truck accident with dismembered hand

There are, of course, situations where your information is literally stolen from you using electronic piracy. I'm referring to those devices that can read your credit card information and the thief can use your account to buy anything from toilet water to islands in the Caribbean. That's why I bought an "As Seen on TV" aluminum wallet for a mere $9.99. It's so strong a truck can run it over and it still keeps on walleting. If it happens to be in your pocket when the truck runs over it, well, who cares, eh? But those electronic credit card readers cannot zap your wallet's contents and read your card--until you take it out of your wallet to actually use your card to pay for something, which, to my way of thinking, may be a flaw in the idea. Besides, those aluminum "As Seen on TV" wallets can't hold very much--maybe one credit card, a library card, health card, and a paper dollar.


I'm no security expert, but I understand the importance of our personal privacy--some things just aren't anyone's business. 

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet