YouTube removes video supporting Trump's statement

The leftists at YouTube removed a video showing how UV light treatment can kill the Chinese Communist Wuhan Coronavirus in the air. There was no reason given for the removal, but it might have something to do with the fact that President Trump mentioned it, and therefore, it is bad, not good.

The medical team at Cedars Sinai and Aytu Bioscience showed how the treatment for the virus is effective and safe for humans, but "Orange Man" likes it, and thus, it was removed.

The video was flagged by New York Times "reporter" Davey Alba to Youtube. She flagged the video because people who were sharing it showed scientists were actually developed the idea that President Donald Trump had mused about during a briefing and giving him kudos is out of the question.

Alba tweeted [brackets are my thoughts]:

I contacted YouTube about this video, which is being shared on tons of replies on Twitter & on Facebook, by people asserting that it backs up Trump's idea throwing it out there that UV rays kill coronavirus.
YouTube just said it removed it for violating its [whatever we say is their] community guidelines. pic.twitter.com/gbs5Igq0yy
— Davey Alba (@daveyalba) April 24, 2020

YouTube apparently would rather disrupt treatment efforts of the virus than give Trump even one iota of credit for his musings. The so-called community guidelines seem to be whatever Trump or conservatives assert must be a lie or harmful in some way and must, therefore, be removed.

Nobody was being endangered by the medical team and the video, it merely explained the science behind the treatment, and it was not possible to duplicate so again, nobody could possibly get injured in any way by the video.

The team tweeted:

Many are now talking about UV light being used as a treatment for COVID-19. We are proud to have teamed up with @MarkPimentelMD and his team at @CedarsSinai. They developed Healight. Peer-reviewed data will be published in days, but here's how it works: https://t.co/9E6dyOkwhI
— Aytu_BioScience (@BioscienceAytu) April 24, 2020

Lifesaving ideas are only permitted on YouTube if they and the New York Times, a former newspaper, approve. And if the idea in question is provided by Trump, you can forget about it.

The situation has deteriorated even more, however.

YouTube is not only going along with requests from the envious left, they are pulling anything that "goes against WHO recommendations,” according to Youtube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki.

#YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki says anything that goes against the W.H.O. is a violation of YouTube policies. All content that isn't "medically substantiated," such as advising people take Vitamin C, will be removed by the platform.
This is called CENSORSHIP folks.#smh pic.twitter.com/9cnB2dnS7O
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) April 21, 2020

If social media platforms are going to censor information they don't like, then they need to be considered publishers, not merely platforms, and as such, they need to be held accountable for what they publish.

Nasheed is right. When these social media platforms are political and biased, they need to be called out on it, particularly when they spew crap that WHO [aka Wuhan Health Organization] is the final arbiter of what is "proper."

YouTube and the New York Times would rather give credit to an organization that on Jan. 14th said that there was no evidence the Wuhan coronavirus was communicable between humans, despite Taiwan saying it is. And then not including Taiwan as a separate nation.

WHO also said toward the end of January [when Trump halted travel with China] that there was no reason to halt travel with the Communist nation, allowing many thousands to travel all over the globe to spread the virus.

YouTube is obviously not neutral but is grossly political. They choose what to promote and what to censor and need to be treated as such.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet