Trump team tries for more debates but Biden's team afraid

President Trump's campaign team tried to get the presidential debate commission to host four debates before the November election. They would like the first debate to be held just after Labor Day, nearly stirring Joe Biden out of his coma.

According to The New York Times, currently substituting as birdcage liner, three Trump associates, including Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's personal attorney, and Brad Parscale, Trump's campaign manager, told the Times the campaign was looking for "fair debates" and wanted them sooner rather than later, and on a "bigger schedule."

“As many Americans as possible need to see the stark differences between the accomplishments and leadership of President Trump and the failed record and sleepiness of Joe Biden,” said Parscale, which is exactly why the Biden campaign will do all it can to avoid having Biden blather on in public.

The Trump campaign also reportedly requested to share influence with the Biden campaign over who would serve as the debate moderator for each event, a move the debate commission has rejected, according to The Washington Post.

Kate Bedingfield, deputy campaign manager for Biden, suggested to The Times in a statement that the Trump campaign was trying to “change the subject” to debates as a way of distracting from unfavorable polling. But the real point is, if Biden does debate with Trump and the public finally recognizes his serious cognitive decline, they might be inclined to vote for Trump and this scares the hell out of Biden's team.

Some people may have to hold their nose and pull the lever for Trump at the voting booth, but to put the nation in the hands of Biden, a guy who cannot complete a thought or a sentence without being confused or distracted, is just wrong.

The Post reported that the Trump campaign requested that no debates be held on the same evenings as NFL games, [especially any game in which Colin Kaepernick may "take a knee" in his cops are pigs socks during the playing of our national anthem].

Biden is currently leading Trump by 12 points in a Fox poll, proving that most people wouldn't know a case of senile dementia if it bit them on the butt. If Biden goes through with having one or more debates, hopefully people will realize just how much his addled brain is screwed up.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Columnist for former newspaper NYT implies Trump lied in unemployment report

The nice thing about being a leftist is that you never have to let facts get in the way of your claims. You can keep your doctor. Colin Kaepernick is a true American hero. Joe Biden is a brilliant and fully sentient human being. And Paul Krugman has the inside scoop on the Labor Department jobs report, thus knowing Trump falsified the numbers.

The economic genius tweeted:

This being the Trump era, you can't completely discount the possibility that they've gotten to the BLS, but it's much more likely that the models used to produce these numbers — they aren't really raw data — have gone haywire in a time of pandemic 3/
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 5, 2020

Does Krugman think for one second that the Bureau of Labor Statistics would protect Trump if he made a false claim?

The May jobs report, released last Friday, was expected to show a 19.8 percent unemployment rate.  Instead it revealed a rate of 13.3 percent.

Even Jason Furman, an Obama-era chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, blasted Krugman within half an hour, saying Trump could not have doctored the report. He added that Krugman's implication undermined the integrity of career Labor Department officials.

It also shows us that Krugman is a liar or a total fool. Of course, both of these things can be true at the same time.

There is absolutely no way that Trump could have compromised the BLS. None.

Furman tweeted:

BLS has 2,400 career staff of enormous integrity and one political appointee with no scope to change this number. https://t.co/Cden6rQyN6 

— Jason Furman (@jasonfurman) June 5, 2020

New York Times contributor and Brookings Institution fellow Justin Wolfers also denounced Krugman's claim:

This is a bad tweet.
Paul, you're right to point out that the underlying models/processes used to produce jobs numbers are less reliable during a pandemic.
But these data weren't tampered with and Paul knows it. The economic debate doesn't need this garbage innuendo. Do better https://t.co/R6tLHldF00
— Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) June 5, 2020

Krugman, realizing nobody was taking his part even on the left, later apologized:

"I was just covering myself, because so many weird things have happened lately," he wrote.

Getting a lot of outraged pushback over even allowing the possibility of something amiss at BLS. I was just covering myself, because so many weird things have happened lately. But I apologize for any suggestion that a highly professional agency might have been corrupted. 1/
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 5, 2020

President Trump took to the bully pulpit to announce the jobs numbers. Who could blame him?

"They thought the number would be a loss of nine million jobs, and it was a gain of almost three million jobs," the President said. "This leads us on to a long period of growth. We'll go back to having the greatest economy anywhere in the world … and I think we're going to have a very good upcoming few months."

Or a very volatile upcoming few months, as the market seems to indicate.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

YouTube removes video supporting Trump's statement

The leftists at YouTube removed a video showing how UV light treatment can kill the Chinese Communist Wuhan Coronavirus in the air. There was no reason given for the removal, but it might have something to do with the fact that President Trump mentioned it, and therefore, it is bad, not good.

The medical team at Cedars Sinai and Aytu Bioscience showed how the treatment for the virus is effective and safe for humans, but "Orange Man" likes it, and thus, it was removed.

The video was flagged by New York Times "reporter" Davey Alba to Youtube. She flagged the video because people who were sharing it showed scientists were actually developed the idea that President Donald Trump had mused about during a briefing and giving him kudos is out of the question.

Alba tweeted [brackets are my thoughts]:

I contacted YouTube about this video, which is being shared on tons of replies on Twitter & on Facebook, by people asserting that it backs up Trump's idea throwing it out there that UV rays kill coronavirus.
YouTube just said it removed it for violating its [whatever we say is their] community guidelines. pic.twitter.com/gbs5Igq0yy
— Davey Alba (@daveyalba) April 24, 2020

YouTube apparently would rather disrupt treatment efforts of the virus than give Trump even one iota of credit for his musings. The so-called community guidelines seem to be whatever Trump or conservatives assert must be a lie or harmful in some way and must, therefore, be removed.

Nobody was being endangered by the medical team and the video, it merely explained the science behind the treatment, and it was not possible to duplicate so again, nobody could possibly get injured in any way by the video.

The team tweeted:

Many are now talking about UV light being used as a treatment for COVID-19. We are proud to have teamed up with @MarkPimentelMD and his team at @CedarsSinai. They developed Healight. Peer-reviewed data will be published in days, but here's how it works: https://t.co/9E6dyOkwhI
— Aytu_BioScience (@BioscienceAytu) April 24, 2020

Lifesaving ideas are only permitted on YouTube if they and the New York Times, a former newspaper, approve. And if the idea in question is provided by Trump, you can forget about it.

The situation has deteriorated even more, however.

YouTube is not only going along with requests from the envious left, they are pulling anything that "goes against WHO recommendations,” according to Youtube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki.

#YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki says anything that goes against the W.H.O. is a violation of YouTube policies. All content that isn't "medically substantiated," such as advising people take Vitamin C, will be removed by the platform.
This is called CENSORSHIP folks.#smh pic.twitter.com/9cnB2dnS7O
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) April 21, 2020

If social media platforms are going to censor information they don't like, then they need to be considered publishers, not merely platforms, and as such, they need to be held accountable for what they publish.

Nasheed is right. When these social media platforms are political and biased, they need to be called out on it, particularly when they spew crap that WHO [aka Wuhan Health Organization] is the final arbiter of what is "proper."

YouTube and the New York Times would rather give credit to an organization that on Jan. 14th said that there was no evidence the Wuhan coronavirus was communicable between humans, despite Taiwan saying it is. And then not including Taiwan as a separate nation.

WHO also said toward the end of January [when Trump halted travel with China] that there was no reason to halt travel with the Communist nation, allowing many thousands to travel all over the globe to spread the virus.

YouTube is obviously not neutral but is grossly political. They choose what to promote and what to censor and need to be treated as such.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet

Orlando nightclub jihadist's wife arrested by FBI

Noor Salman, the 30-year-old wife of Omar Mateen, who massacred 49 people and wounded dozens more last June at Orlando's Pulse Nightclub and was killed by police in a shootout, has been arrested in California, Brain Flushings has just learned. Mateen had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (aka ISIS).

The shooting is considered the deadliest in modern U.S. history.

The charges against the hijab-clad Noor Salman include aiding and abetting her husband's attempts to support ISIS and obstruction of justice. The U.S. Attorney in Florida along with Department of Justice attorneys wanted to charge Salman with material support of the terror group, but Acting Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord refused to support additional charges, perhaps having a 'leftist moment' and feeling hasn't this poor girl suffered enough?

Salman was picked up at her home in Rodeo, California by FBI agents from the San Francisco bureau office. She didn't put up any resistance.

In April of last year, Salman and her now dead husband, Mateen, took their 3-year-old mini-jihadist son Walt Disney World, but they behaved suspiciously and Disney officials contacted the FBI to alert them that the pair appeared to be scouting the theme park as a venue for a future attack.

So the lovely couple and kid went to another Disney location, Disney Springs, in June.

On June 12, during the attack, Mateen placed 16 calls and used SMS to text. Three calls were to 911, one was to a local news service, at which time he did the ISIS pledge and said he supported the Boston Marathon bombers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

Mateen also texted Salman during his shooting rampage, posted to Facebook (possibly "unliking" a bunch of infidels, one can imagine) and again proclaimed his allegiance to the "Black Flag Insect Scumcrumpets" of ISIS, pledged more attacks, used SnapChat to communicate with at least one more person, and cancelled his dentist appointment (just kidding).

Salman is to make her first federal court appearance Tuesday in San Francisco. After the shooting she moved to Contra County. The charges were filed in Middle District of Florida, the same jurisdiction where the Pulse Nightclub massacre occurred. After the San Francisco appearance, she is due to fly back to Florida where she will continue through the judicial process.

The New York Times was the first to make the report.

Salman said in November that she didn't have a clue about what her now dead husband was planning. "I was unaware of everything." She also claimed that her husband became increasingly violent as their marriage got more and more explosive, even to the point in which she said he punched her in a fit of rage while she was pregnant, and they were out buying camouflaged baby clothes. The child is now four and is named after his mujahideen dad.

The DoJ released transcripts of Mateen's 911 calls after the shooting. In one call he said, "Praise be to Allah, and prayers as well as peace be upon the prophet of Allah. I let you know, I'm in Orlando and I did the shootings." All of this crap was said in Arabic, the language of Mohammed. 

So more is to follow about Salman and her case.




Tweet

The Most Transparent Thing About Obama is His Lack of Transparency

Exclusively using a private email server as secretary of state is perhaps illegal, but if not, we undoubtedly can agree that it's wrong and downright stupid. Hillary Clinton's judgment is clearly analogous to that of a liberal tweaking Chuck Norris's nose and then calling him a pussy. It's stupid and it's going to get you hospitalized with only Obamacare to depend upon. Good luck.

But the Obama administration has stepped away from Hillary on this latest scandal and as "the most transparent administration" in the history of the United States, wants to get to the bottom of this.

So, is the Obama administration the most transparent one ever to grace the White House?

The answer is clearly: hahaha hahaha NO!