Posts
 |
| 2020: "Would you like to supersize that meal?" |
But Comatose's freak-out was merely proof that she had not actually read the article because Kaczynski didn't write it.
Two reporters from The Washington Post both having uteruses, wrote the piece. And while it was rather pointless piece of trash, it wasn’t, nor dared to be, an attack on Warren.
Ironically, it is usually AOC who attacks people for making the megabucks.
“Sen. Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters during her career as a professor at Ivy League law schools, charging as much as $675 an hour to advise a variety of clients, from people with asbestos disease to a corporation facing possible liability over ruptured breast implants,” explained The Washington Post article. All that Kaczynski did was to share it.
"While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour,” Kaczinski captioned in his posting of the article.
But AOC mindlessly tweeted accusingly about Kaczinski:
Washington Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold highlighted the blatant stupidity of AOC’s mindless tweeting:
As highlighted by Twitchy, others commented on the problems with the freshman Congresswoman’s tweet, including her typical disdain for “the rich.” But it's more likely that socialists have more than simple disdain for the rich, they clearly have high levels of envy and want to punish the rich for their success.
“BREAKING NEWS: Communist Who Considers Wealth a ‘Policy Failure,’ & ‘White Supremacy’ Nation's Biggest Threat, Exempts Perpetrator of Racist Fraud b/c She's Female,” said radio host Ben Crystal.
“Is Elizabeth Warren a smart, hard-working woman who deserves to be compensated at 80X the minimum wage, or is she an exploitative wage-thieving capitalist? Did she pay her 'fair share' of taxes, or no?” asked popular political Twitter account @notwokieleaks. “Why defend Warren here while calling most other high-earners monsters?”
“Sen. Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters during her career as a professor at Ivy League law schools, charging as much as $675 an hour to advise a variety of clients, from people with asbestos disease to a corporation facing possible liability over ruptured breast implants,” explained The Washington Post article. All that Kaczynski did was to share it.
"While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an hour,” Kaczinski captioned in his posting of the article.
But AOC mindlessly tweeted accusingly about Kaczinski:
“BREAKING NEWS: Lady Had A Job, Got Paid More Than Me. Nice work.”But the "genius" wasn't finish as she added:
“Now do the amount of Wall Street, Big Pharma, & Fossil Fuel presidential candidates accepted over their careers & how much they’re taking now.”AOC was obviously implying that it was Kaczynski’s “sexist” scoop when he didn’t even write the report.
Washington Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold highlighted the blatant stupidity of AOC’s mindless tweeting:
“AOC tweeted at a male reporter and strongly implied sexism was his motive for the piece. In fact it wasn't his piece. In fact, the piece was written by two women.”Griswold noted that it’s “a pretty low bar for most people, and most people are not freaking U.S. Representative” to actually go ahead and click the link of an article they’re commenting on. She didn't even bother to do that simple task, and now we can wait for AOC to attack him for attacking her idiocy.
As highlighted by Twitchy, others commented on the problems with the freshman Congresswoman’s tweet, including her typical disdain for “the rich.” But it's more likely that socialists have more than simple disdain for the rich, they clearly have high levels of envy and want to punish the rich for their success.
“BREAKING NEWS: Communist Who Considers Wealth a ‘Policy Failure,’ & ‘White Supremacy’ Nation's Biggest Threat, Exempts Perpetrator of Racist Fraud b/c She's Female,” said radio host Ben Crystal.
“Is Elizabeth Warren a smart, hard-working woman who deserves to be compensated at 80X the minimum wage, or is she an exploitative wage-thieving capitalist? Did she pay her 'fair share' of taxes, or no?” asked popular political Twitter account @notwokieleaks. “Why defend Warren here while calling most other high-earners monsters?”
Why indeed. It all depends which side of the aisle you sit on.
“He didn’t write the article. 2 WaPo women reporters did & the article does everything it can to flatteringly portray her work on Chapter 11 bankruptcy creditor committees. There is, literally, no attack in the entire piece,” another Twitter user noted.
“He didn’t write the article. 2 WaPo women reporters did & the article does everything it can to flatteringly portray her work on Chapter 11 bankruptcy creditor committees. There is, literally, no attack in the entire piece,” another Twitter user noted.
If AOC should have attacked anyone, it would have to be Warren and her money bags.
And AOC isn't innocent as she pretends to be--in March, it was reported that a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission alleged AOC's chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti funneled over $1 million in political donations to private companies he owned.
“The cash transfers from the PACs — overseen by Saikat Chakrabarti, the freshman socialist Democrat's chief of staff — run counter to her pledges to increase transparency and reduce the influence of ‘dark money’ in politics,” The Washington Examiner reported. “Chakrabarti's companies appear to have been set up for the sole purpose of obscuring how the political donations were used.”
How do you like them big apples, New York?
Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment