Guess who John Kirby blames for Iran's attack on Israel

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Of course you guessed it: former President Donald Trump is responsible for the attack on Israel by Iran. Yes, it's all Trump's fault like everything else that's wrong in the universe. And it's almost believable by the Left because it's obvious Joe Biden has little to no effect on anything, so nothing is his fault.

Except that it is.

It's obvious that anything that negatively reflects on the Biden administration can somehow be blamed on Trump. Never in the history of mankind has one man had such an effect on the planet, in spite of Biden bragging when he first tripped into the White House that "the buck" stops at his desk. He was lying through his dentures.

Even when Biden clearly screws up, he always finds someone else to blame, and when he can, that someone is Donald Trump. 

But this time he and his administration went too far, even for the left. 

On Sunday, White House National Security Communications Adviser and side-of-the-mouth talker, John Kirby went on the political shows and his goal was to blame Trump as the person responsible for Iran's assault on Israel. 

Anyone with even half a brain, and that's most of the Democratic Party, knows that claim is totally ridiculous, considering that Biden is as impotent as a sighted person in bed with Whoopi Goldberg.

Kirby spoke on "Fox News Sunday" with Shannon Bream where he rejected criticism that the Biden administration was weak on Tehran, noting sanctions, the word "don't" and other measures did nothing to stop the attack. 

"It's hard to take a look at what President Biden has done and say that we've somehow gone soft on Iran," Kirby said, hoping someone other than "The View" would believe him. "It was the previous administration that decided to get us out of the Iran deal. And now Iran is so much dramatically closer to potential nuclear weapon capability than they were before … Mr. Trump was elected."

But that's because the Iran deal sucked and would only delay Iran's ambitions for nuclear weaponry. 

When he was asked about the billions [so called sanctions relief] given to Iran and how the regime used it, he said, "It's not even sanctions relief but the additional funds that have been made available to Iran due to [the] sanctions relief program that the Trump administration put in place can only be used for humanitarian goods. It doesn't go to the regime."

Bull crap.

 

Trump was the only president since Obama who was tough on Iran, which also included taking the U.S out of the Obama and John Kerry deal where Kerry would have handed over his ketchup baroness wife to reach a weapons deal with the lying terrorists of Iran. 

What was proposed would have never helped the U.S. goals but Hair Plugs Kerry didn't care because his unearned ego and blowfish brain got in the way. When Trump saw what was on the table, he walked away from the Iran deal, and even refused to give Iran pallets of cash as Obama did when he left office.

Obama and Kerry are traitors; for Kerry, his disdain for America began in Vietnam, and for Obama, it probably began in college. Communists parents often have that kind of influence over their kids.

"Don't" was Biden's warning to Iran. And it took Biden a week to memorize the line and see how that worked out.

Tweet

Iran likely to attack Israel as US admits the threat is 'credible' and Biden remains confused

The U.S. is keeping close watch on what it sees as a "credible" threat of an Iran attack on Israel in response to Israel's strike on Iran's Damascus consulate where plans were likely being made to attack Israel. 

That's what is known as a preemptive strike, boys and girls.

"I would just say that we're watching this very, very closely," U.S. National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications (USNSCCSC) John Kirby (D) told reporters Friday. "We still deemed the potential threat by Iran here to be real, to be viable, certainly credible, and we're watching it as closely as we can."

"Right now, our focus is on having a conversation with our Israeli counterparts and making sure not just conversations, but making sure that they have what they need and that they're able to defend themselves," USNSCCSC Kirby (D) added. "We're also clear it would be imprudent if we didn't take a look at our own posture in the region to make sure that we're properly prepared as well."

Never underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up, someone once said.

Kirby assured that the U.S. remains in "constant communication" with Israeli counterparts to make sure they are ready for attack but refused to "armchair quarterback … in a public way in terms of the conversations we’re having or what we’re seeing in the intelligence picture."

Tehran threatened to respond against Israel now that they have an excuse that goes beyond mere anti-Semitism, after they struck the Iranian consulate in Damascus, killing seven Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) terrorist scum, including not one, but two generals. 

Over last weekend at the Quds Day commemoration, the Hezbollah leadership bragged about their willingness to attack Israel in retaliation.

U.S. CENTCOM Gen. Michael Kurilla has been in Israel, where he met with the IDF Chief of the General Staff Lt. Gen Hezi Halevi and the cool-named Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant to assess military preparedness. He moved up his plans due to the imminent threat that comes from Iran which was confirmed by Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, although specific threats were not speculated on.

Travel advisories were also issued by the State Department for Israel on Thursday. U.S. government employees and their families have been restricted from travel there.

Iran has signaled to Biden's handler[s] that it will respond to Israel’s attack on the Damascus consulate, but may do so in a way that aims to avoid major escalation and will not act hastily, Reuters reported Thursday. It's like a guy punches you in the face and you go after his younger brother, or have someone else do it for you. 

Tweet

Reporter calls out Biden's balderdash blather at White House briefing

White House National Security Council John Kirby danced around a question regarding alleged President Biden's frequent battles with the truth, after Biden lied about having been at Ground Zero on September 12, 2001, the day after the attacks.

[H/T New York Post]

“The president has lied about being at Ground Zero the day after the Sept. 11 attacks, falsely claimed he saw the Pittsburgh bridge collapse, claimed his grandfather died in the hospital days before his birth. What is going on with the president? Is he just believing things that didn’t happen did happen, or is he just randomly making stuff up?” Washington Times reporter Jeff Mordock bluntly asked Kirby in a real journalistic moment during Wednesday’s White House press briefing.

Kirby, a retired Navy rear admiral [the same rank as the very Rear Admiral Rachel Levine] and veteran military public affairs officer, waltzed around the question, highlighting Biden’s Monday trip to visit troops in Alaska and clarifying the 80-year-old president’s Ground Zero lie.

“The president was deeply touched and honored to be able to spend 9/11 with military members there in Alaska and some families and was honored by their presence and the chance to make an important set of remarks about why we need to continue to remember that day. And he did that,” Kirby, who has no sense of shame, said.

“And he spoke about a visit to Ground Zero, which he did participate in about a week or so after the event, and what that looked and what that smelled and what that felt like. And it had a visceral impact on him as it did so many other Americans on that terrible day.” After all, the human sense of smell is the last thing to go when we're older than dirt, but not when it comes to smelling young, human hair, it seems.

“What is going on with the president?” Jeff Mordock asked.

Biden, who is now older than what's left of his IQ, described the scene from Ground Zero one day after the collapse of the World Trade Center in remarks to military service members in Anchorage, Alaska, on the 22nd anniversary of the terrorist attacks. He is the first alleged president to break with tradition and not attend Ground Zero in New York because he was told not to do so by some unelected bureaucrat--possibly the same one who dressed as the Easter Bunny last year and interrupted him from blathering on about something in the jasmine of his mind.

“Ground Zero in New York — I remember standing there the next day and looking at the building. And I felt like I was looking through the gates of hell,” Biden said. He wasn't joking--he was simply lying.

“It looked so devastating because the way you could, from where you could stand,” he mumble-added.

A White House official who reads minds told The Post on Monday that old Joe was thinking about his Sept. 20, 2001, Ground Zero visit, as part of a 38-senator delegation nine days after the attack.

Kirby added that the president is “focused on making sure that an attack like that never happens again,”  by reducing the budget of the military, using a drag queen to entice recruitment, and basing everything on equity and inclusion, rather than killing any enemy that messes with us.

Unsatisfied with the White House official’s response, Mordock noted that Biden has “had a string of saying things that happened didn’t, things that are easily debunked. Why does he keep doing that?”

“The president was grateful to spend that time with those family members and those troops,” Kirby responded and walked off in a Bidenish shuffle.

Tweet

We're out of ammo and the world is pondering what to do as we tap dance to get more

Thanks to President and Commander in Chief, Joseph Robinette Biden, every Tom, Dick and Mohammed knows that the United States is low on ammunition. For some inexplicable reason, the potted plant POTUS had to blurt out that information on the Creative News Network, telling far-left host Fareed Zakaria this little factoid. 

“This is a war relating to munitions. And [Ukraine]… is running out of that ammunition, and we’re low on it,” Biden mumbled coherently enough for all the world to hear the obviously classified information.

Babbling Biden also claimed that the shortage was one reason behind the controversial decision to send immoral cluster munitions to Ukraine, in his clusterfrack way that he has when off teleprompter.

The U.S. is now scrambling like "River Dance" being played at 1.75 speed to increase stockpiles, if you believe John Kirby, the coordinator for strategic communication [aka ministry of propaganda] at the National Security Council.

Kirby appeared with Fox News' Shannon Bream on "Fox News Sunday" and described their River Dance:

"We’re working very closely with the defense industry to try to ramp up production, particularly for artillery shells…

"You saw that we gave some cluster munitions to Ukraine as a bridging solution here while we ramp up production. We’re having very, very strong conversations with the defense industry and we believe that we’ll be able to get there."

Cluster munitions are smaller anti-personnel bombs inside a bigger bomb that gets distributed along larger areas and are intended to kill whoever is in the area. Cluster bombs do not distinguish between soldiers, women, children or babies. They just kill folks.

Bream mentioned a think tank report that estimated it could take years to get back to where we were in terms of our munitions.

It's hard to know what or who to believe, but in any case, war sucks and people die. Why isn't it okay to not take sides on this one?

And when all is said and done, nobody is going to do anything to impeach our cognitively impaired, child-hair-sniffing criminal in office. But boy, what they are doing to Donald Trump.

It’s infuriating.

Tweet

No Joe as balloons go to and fro

"Freehadfrakafronitz, I'm serious"

How many unidentified flying objects will be found over the U.S., and perhaps get shot down at our leisure, before out so called President comes out of hiding, changes his Depends and deals with the situation? It almost feels like he's running for president again because he's nowhere to be found.

The Biden team [aka the actual leadership] reportedly had to give "private assurances" that it isn't cis gender Martians, but NORAD Commander Gen VanHerck was asked about that at a briefing on Sunday. His response was not reassuring.

A reporter asked VanHerck, "Have you ruled out aliens or extraterrestrials?" to which he replied, "I haven't ruled out anything at this point."

GENERAL GLEN D. VANHERCK: "I haven't ruled out anything at this point." pic.twitter.com/rT0freDQyC

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 13, 2023

Well that's a load off our collective mind.

VanHerck said he'd leave the answer to that question to the "intel community," which has tended to be more of an oxymoron than intel. He said they are continuing to rule out every possible threat, but if that were true, President Biden would not be in the White House. 

True to form, the White House sent out their Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre who spoke about a place she called "Canadia," as she blathered and bumbled trying to explain what NORAD is.  It's pretty sad that our White House Press Secretary could not even get the name of Canada right. But at least she's gay and Black--that makes her qualified in Joe Biden's eyes.

And when MSNBC says that Biden's team has a lack of transparency, you know the end of times is near.

Biden has been invisible since he had an interview that ran Thursday prior to the downing of the three "objects" and in which he downplayed the Chinese spy balloon that was shot down the prior week after it got all the US data it needed.

Biden says the Chinese spy balloon he let traverse the entire country gathering surveillance was "not a major [security] breach." pic.twitter.com/dnMFciOJRB

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) February 10, 2023

Which just proves that it is Biden himself who is a security breach.

He had actually been in D.C. for a black-tie dinner over the weekend but when questioned by so called reporters, he had nothing to mumble on Saturday. He refused to act presidential, maybe because he still thinks Kamala Harris is the President.

On Monday National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications Blah Blah, John Kirby, was questioned about Biden's refusal to address the situation. The former disgrace to the uniform of the US Navy lied claiming that they have been as "transparent as can be."

No Kirby--they might have been as trans as they could be, but certainly not transparent in any shape or form. Seriously, this administration pees on your leg and tells you "Welcome to Niagara Falls."

Even though Biden has not publicly addressed the multiple "objects" found over the United States and Canada, spokesperson John Kirby claims the Biden administration has "been as transparent as we can be." pic.twitter.com/MT4CTw5fCy

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) February 13, 2023

Either they are clueless about what's up there in our skies, or like Joe Biden, have no idea what things are.

Clearly, this is the most incompetent administration in the history of the nation. Nobody seems to have been appointed to this administration based on abilities, but on identity politics.

And it's the President's job to assuage the fears of the American people and bring clarity to the situation. But let's face it, with Biden as President, they know putting him in front of a microphone to explain what's going on would be a political disaster. If a duck had his brain, it'd fly north for the winter.

Tweet

Iraq Presidential Palace Breached but US Denies Embassy Evacuation

Haydar Karaalp/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Iraq's presidential palace was breached Monday in response to a Shi'ite cleric announcing his resignation from politics to pursue a career as a standup comic at a Gaza Strip club. [He has been working on an opening line joke: "A Jewish guy walks into a mosque."]

A video appears to show U.S. Embassy employees in Baghdad being airlifted by a helicopter.

John Kirby, the empty-suit coordinator for strategic communications at the National Security Council, later claimed that there was no evacuation of U.S. Embassy personnel, in contrast with earlier reports.

“There’s no evacuation going on at the embassy and no indication that’s going to be required at this time,” Kirby told Democrat note-takers, [aka reporters] according to The Hill.

Concerns of unrest have grown recently, with the U.S. Embassy in Iraq releasing a statement last week urging calm among all parties.

“We are closely monitoring reports of unrest in Baghdad today at the Supreme Judicial Council,” an embassy spokesperson said.

“We urge all parties to remain calm, abstain from violence, and resolve any political differences through a peaceful process guided by the Iraqi constitution. We also call for those demonstrating to respect the proceedings and property of Iraq’s governmental institutions which belong to and serve the Iraqi people,” the spokesperson added, tongue-in-cheek. 

The Iraqi government has been in controversy since October when cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s party won the most seats in the election but failed to reach the number needed to form a majority government, kind of like what happened in Canada with Trudeau. The Shi'ite leader refused to negotiate with Iran-backed Shi'ites to create a consensus government because only no good can come from that.

Al-Sadr’s supporters staged a government sit-in over the past four weeks to prevent political/religious rivals from forming an opposing coalition government. His party members have also announced their resignations, with al-Sadr joining in solidarity. "I will do comedy now," said al-Sadr.

The leaders’ statement was in response to the retirement of the Shia spiritual leader Ayatollah Kadhim al-Haeri, who counts many of al-Sadr’s supporters as followers. The Ayatollah plans to open a university in Italy calling it "Ayatollah U." It will specialize in Critical Racist Theory and chemical engineering.

On Sunday, al-Haeri announced he was stepping down and called on his followers to support Iran’s main Shi'ite leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei instead of the Shia spiritual center in Najaf, Iraq.

In response, several hundred crazed protesters breached the concrete barriers outside the palace gates and stormed the building. Iraq’s military issued a curfew and has called on protesters to leave immediately.

Some protesters have decided to stay despite the warning, with video surfacing of intruders enjoying the palace swimming pool, much like the Jan. 6 "insurrectionists," in which Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed female "insurrectionist" climbed through a window and was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer, with a questionable history regarding his use of his firearm.

Outside of the palace, other protesters ran from gunfire The Jerusalem Post reported .The gunfire was believed to be from the Iran-backed Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) firing to stop demonstrators dead in their tracks.

Iraq’s Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has reportedly been evacuated as a safety precaution.

As of this posting, some outlets are reporting that the U.S. Embassy is evacuating the building via helicopter, proving just how empty John Kirby's suit really is. Also, Reuters reports that thus far, 10 people have been killed and dozens injured in clashes, and various groups are throwing rocks at each other.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Joe Biden has not yet refused to answer questions by reporters but he hasn't been asked any as of now as he appears to be on another well-deserved vacation.

Tweet

BREAKING: Up to 8,500 US troops on alert over Ukraine crisis

As many as 8,500 US forces are on "heightened alert" for potential deployment to eastern Europe as 
growing tensions between Washington and Moscow over Ukraine, the Pentagon announced Monday.

Defense Department press secretary and Democratic puppet, John Kirby at his regular briefing made it clear that no final decision was yet made about whether to deploy our troops as part of a NATO response force (NRF) as part of the 40,000 that would constitute the NATO's military response to Russia should they invade Ukraine.

This appears to be Biden's way of distracting the American public from the consistently poor job he is doing here at home. The administration is calling for the evacuation of the US embassy in Ukraine, and those Americans not on the government payroll are asked to leave but they are on their own to find a way out.

Doesn't this embassy evacuation remind you a little bit of another one? Oh yeah, Afghanistan. That two evacuations by our embassies in one year. Great job, Joe.

It's horrible to think that Biden would get us into a shooting war with Russia just to help his poll numbers, but let's not put it past him.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

“We’ll continue to provide updates in the coming days about these decisions,” Kirby said, inspiring great confidence in people who eat Tide pods. “But specifically this will ensure that the United States and our commitment to the NRF has – is consistent with their readiness for rapid deployment again, if activated.”

Kirby clarified that the troops would likely be considered “ground forces,” [aka grunts]. The NRF can only be activated by NATO rather than President Biden who cannot be trusted to activate an Alka Seltzer tablet in a gallon of water.

“It is our contribution to the response force,” Kirby said, “and we want to make sure that they’re ready to go.”

Meanwhile, Putin is shaking in his shoes over Biden's threats, but let's not forget that while he's a scummy dictator, he's certainly no Corn Pop.

Tweet

Report: US knew about Kabul bomber, had him in drone sights but didn't pull the trigger

According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for western hemisphere affairs, Roger Pardo-Maurer, in an interview with Director of MRC Latino Jorge Bonilla, he was told that the Department of Defense already knew the identity of the Kabul bomber before the bombing in Kabul. Also, the DoD had intel as to when the attack would take place but did nothing to stop it.

If true, this is damning to the Biden administration and the intelligence community for sitting on their hands and doing nothing to stop the killings of 13 American military and almost 200 Afghans looking to flee the country.

[H/T Redstate]

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Per former Deputy Assistant SecDef Roger Pardo-Maurer, the DoD had foreknowledge of the Kabul bomber AND denied permission to fire to the Predator drone that had a lock on the bomber. pic.twitter.com/ZDh27drdwu

When asked about the report of intelligence communications showing we had general knowledge of when and even the gate where the attack would take place at Kabul airport, The Abbey Gate was at "highest risk."

Pentagon spokesman and propaganda distributor John Kirby refused to discuss it and complained about leaked intelligence, which should give you some clue as to the veracity of the claim.

Pardo-Maurer went further in his interview. He said not only did they know where and when it would happen, but that they had a Predator drone lock on the bomber, but that “they” refused to grant permission to take the guy out. “[Permission] was requested and was denied,” he said. Why? “Because we are in this process of negotiating with the Taliban who aren’t even in control of their own government or their own people.”

Remember, the Taliban offered to allow the US to control Kabul airport and the perimeter but the Biden administration refused. If I were a conspiracy theorist [which I'm not], I would posit that we were afraid to anger the Taliban if we took the shot on the suicide bomber to protect our people and the Afghans. If I had to guess, I'd call it Joe's "risk averseness."

Kirby needs to be grilled by the press and asked what the intelligence community knew, when did they know it and who the hell told them not to take the shot. Heads should roll, but hey, that's going to happen anyway, just not by us.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Creative News Network blasts military in Iraq for their MAGA hats for Trump to sign

There is absolutely nothing that President Trump can do that will ever be supported by the leftist media. It's almost funny if you don't allow it to bother you.

If Trump did not visit the troops overseas at Christmas they'd call him a heartless creature. But now that he did visit them they're not only going after him, they're even going after the troops!

On Wednesday, POTUS visited our troops at the al-Asad airbase in Iraq, much to the chagrin of many in entertainment who engaged their Twitter finger before engaging their brains, like Montel Williams and Alyssa Milano.

After they learned that he was in Iraq, the Creative News Network (CNN) took a shot at the troops who asked Trump to sign their "Make America Great Again" hats or their embroidered patches reading "Trump 2020.” 

The leftists at the network discussed whether the service members might have violated Department of Defense guidelines against partisan political activities, and later implied on its website that the troops had indeed violated the rules. 

But the liars at CNN left out a key part of the guidelines when they quoted the guidelines.

On CNN’s “The Situation Room,” [the room where they discuss every situation that Trump should have done differently] the network turned to a leftist military expert to determine whether the actions of the troops was inappropriate. Rather than selecting an unbiased military expert, CNN used Retired Rear Adm. John "Obama Boy" Kirby, an actual spokesperson for the Obama administration. 

You just knew he was going to be the voice of reason on this or any Trump-related issue.

Kirby theorized that the troops’ actions were indeed inappropriate, saying in that cute, teasing way he has, "It is in fact a campaign slogan, that is a campaign item, and it is completely inappropriate for the troops to do this.”

Jim Acosta loving him some Jim Acosta

The segment began with CNN’s Chief Narcissist, Jim Acosta, asking the "Never Trump" Kirby, “And John, what would the concern be if something like that is going on, do you think? Or is this just a soldier’s there, he’s got a hat in his locker, and he runs over and says, “Hey, when am I gonna have another chance for the president to sign one of these things?”

Kirby answered, “Yeah, look; it kind of blurs the line, because Trump is his slogan; where is that line? But Barb’s right; it is, in fact, a campaign slogan that is a campaign item, and it is completely inappropriate for the troops to do this.”

CNN wrote on their website, “Video footage and the written report of Trump's visit with service members in Iraq showed the President signing "Make America Great Again" hats and an embroidered patch that read "Trump 2020." CNN then warned, “But troops' requests for the autographs could brush up against Department of Defense guidelines for political activities.”

They forgot to compliment Trump and Melania for going to a war zone to be with the troops around the holidays.

CNN noted that the Department of Defense guidelines state: 

“Active duty personnel may not engage in partisan political activities and all military personnel should avoid the inference that their political activities imply or appear to imply DoD sponsorship, approval, or endorsement of a political candidate, campaign, or cause.”

What CNN "forgot" to quote from the guidelines was:

 “Active duty members may, however, express their personal opinions on political candidates and issues, make monetary contributions to a political campaign or organization, and attend political events as a spectator when not in uniform.”

And let's not forget that President Trump is not only their president; he's their commander-in-chief. Supporting him the way they did, was both respectful and appropriate.

There is no doubt that President Trump has character flaws, but when the media continuously goes after him and those who support him, with the insatiable hatred they show, it only brings him more support--as it should.


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.



Tweet

Russian ambassador killed by Muslim jihadist

Ankara, Turkey -- a news photographer captured a photo of a jihad attacker screaming "Allahu Akbar!" ("Allah is greater") and shot Russia's ambassador to Turkey in an Ankara art exhibit. 

Three others were also shot in the apparent Islamic terror attack. The ambassador has since died.

click to see the graphic video

Russian Ambassador Andrei Karlov was giving a speech when the Muslim gunman suddenly shot him in the back. 

Still and video cameras caught the cowardly attack as Karlov fell to the floor and the Islamist moved toward him shouting Islamic slogans that may have gotten him laid in the afterlife as he was soon thereafter killed by Turkish forces. 

Flipping the 'shahada' finger

Turkish media reported that the gunman had been killed and Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova announced that Karlov had been killed in a live television statement.

The Muslim assassin was identified as a Turkish special forces police officer, Ankara mayor Melih Gokcek said. This was probably why the gunman was able to be armed and to be so close to the ambassador. 

The mayor told the media that the attack was aimed at ruining relations between Turkey and Russia now that the two countries had started to normalize ties in June.

The Islamist gunman could be heard screaming in Turkish: "Don't forget about Aleppo, don't forget about Syria! Don't forget to have my 72 virgins waiting for me, Allah, for I'm ready to make the trip to your promised land." (I made parts of that up.)

Russian officials told Turkish newspaper Hurriyet, that the shooter was believed to be an Islamic radical and could be heard yelling "Allahu Akbar."

Wow, ya think?

U.S. State Department puppet, John Kirby, said U.S. officials were aware of reports about the shooting. Then pulled out his worn index card and read: "We condemn this act of violence, whatever its source. Our thoughts and prayers are with him and his family."

Yadda yadda.

Ambassador Karlov was 62 and has been Russia's ambassador to Turkey since July 2013. Prior to that, he was Russia's ambassador to North Korea from 2001-2006, indicating that Russia gave Karlov the crappiest ambassador assignments.

He is survived by a wife and son. 

The condition of the other wounded is not yet known.


Tweet

It wasn't the video, it was State hiring the terrorists

The State Department under then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hired an obscure private security firm to protect U.S. diplomats in Benghazi in spite of internal objections by those in the agency who were not incompetent and lazy like Hillary Clinton. 

It has just been discovered that the company, the Wales-based Blue Mountain Group, staffed their ranks with hastily recruited terrorists who helped carry out the Benghazi attack, according to multiple sources telling Fox News.

One source, who spoke on condition of anonymity (perhaps in fear of Clinton "payback") said Blue Mountain used local newspaper ads to assemble a team of 20 guards, many with terror ties, once the company was paid $9.2 million. The source is an independent security specialist who has set up training programs at U.S. Consulates around the world and obviously knows what he's doing, whereas Hillary Clinton does not.

"The guards who were hired were locals who were part of the Ansar al-Sharia and Al Qaeda groups operating in Benghazi," the source said--his own contract ended in Benghazi in November 2011. He added, "Whoever approved contracts at the State Department hired Blue Mountain Group and then allowed Blue Mountain Group to hire local Libyans who were not vetted."

A great number of the terrorist scumcrumpets were members of the Libyan government-financed February 17th Martyrs Brigade, an Islamist militia previously used to guard Americans before Blue Mountain replaced them.

One of the CIA contractors who fought the terrorists in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, John "Tig" Tiegen, confirmed that the locals who attacked the consulate that night included guards working for Blue Mountain.

Hillary Clinton confirmed the next day that a video about the prophet Mohammed was what started the whole thing.

"Many of the local Libyans who attacked the consulate on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, were the actual guards that the State Department under Hillary Clinton hired to protect the Consulate in Benghazi," Tig said. "The guards were unvetted and were locals with basically no background at all in providing security. Most of them never had held a job in security in the past.

"Blue Mountain Libya, at the time of being awarded the contract by our State Department, had no employees so they quickly had to find people to work, regardless of their backgrounds," he said.

How can anyone think that Hillary Clinton (with her illegal email server, a maid who printed out her sensitive documents and had access to the Presidential Daily Briefing, and who did nothing to help Ambassador Chris Stevens after he made literally hundreds of requests for more security) would be a president capable of keeping America safe?

A former Benghazi guard, Weeam Mohamed, also confirmed in an email sent to the Citizens Commission on Benghazi that at least four of the guards hired by Blue Mountain took part in the attack after opening doors of the complex to allow their confederates in.

"In the U.S. Mission, there were four people [who] belonged to the battalion February 17," Mohamed said in a written statement to the Commission, an independent group formed with Accuracy in Media whose purpose was to investigate the attack and how the administration [mis]handled it.

"Always armed, and they are free to move anywhere inside a building mission.

"And therefore, they had a chance to do an attack on the mission's headquarters. They have all the details about the place. At the same time they have given the United States a painful blow," he wrote.

Blue Mountain officials did what Hillary Clinton did during her campaign--they made themselves scare and weren't available for comment.

The State Department officials, who were not there at the Benghazi complex when it was attacked, acknowledged in emails obtained by FoxNews.com that the local recruits fell short of their duty, but denied the claim that any of the guards took an active role that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

State Department spokes-puppet and former man of honor John Kirby said "While the Accountability Review Board report and other reports were critical of our local guards' performance, we are not aware of any evidence that they participated in the attacks themselves."

So the account given by John Tiegen, one of the men who was there, doesn't count.

The source told Fox News: "We kept asking for additional support, including a 50-caliber mounted machine gun, but the State Department would not give it to us, because they said it would upset the locals. Instead, the State Department hired a company that doesn't have employees, which then hired terrorists."

But who are we kidding? Nothing is going to change and Hillary Clinton will very possibly be the next Barack Obama.

Her incompetence is cringe-worthy.



Tweet

National security--what, Hillary worry?

A "senior aide" to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton left classified material unattended and unsecured in a hotel room in China in 2010. This incredible violation was confirmed as Hillary Clinton is under a renewed FBI investigation (yes, the Federal Bureau of Investigation actually investigates) of mishandling classified and sensitive information on a private server of her closest aide, Huma Weiner Abedin, who is also under investigation.

The aide who left this information unattended has not been named.

State Department spokesman John Kirby told Fox News in a statement issued after a FOIA request was filed with the agency: 

"In May 2010, Secretary Clinton was on official travel in Beijing, China, accompanied by senior staff. Upon Secretary Clinton's departure, a routine security sweep by Diplomatic Security agents identified classified documents in a staff member's suite."

Diplomatic Security wrote up the incident on Form 117, and Marine Security Guards (Semper Fi) filed a separate formal report, according to Fox's source.

The information about the mishandling of classified information came into the light of day when the FBI investigated whether Hillary Clinton or her staff violated the US Espionage Act by mishandling classified and top secret information. 

Obviously they had violated the law, at least we know Hillary did based on public knowledge that she used a private server for her job as secretary of state, and the fact that sensitive information was found to be contained on the server. That's all it takes to be indicted, but James Comey, FBI Director, apparently acted politically by not recommending indictment of behavior that clearly was indictable. He is trying to undo that now, it appears.

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, (R-Calif.) cited a whistleblower who came to him with an allegation that it was Hillary Clinton herself who left the material out, and he wrote to the FBI seeking more information.

Nunes wrote to Director Comey: "I . . . understand that former Secretary Clinton left unclassified documents in her hotel room in China and that U.S. Marine Corps security officials filed a report related to the possible compromise of the documents."

In another instance, Nunes said in an email released in response to a FOIA request, described Huma Abedin asking another Clinton staffer to remove "burnstuff" Abedin had left in a car during a trip to India.

You cannot make this stuff up.

Kirby told Fox News that the incident with Abedin may not have involved classified material. Perhaps it was a recipe for chicken biryani.

Kirby insisted, however, that the China incident had nothing to do with Clinton because, well, nothing negative ever does.

"To be clear -- this was not Secretary Clinton's hotel room and no citation whatsoever was given to Secretary Clinton, nor were any reports written about Secretary Clinton's conduct." 

Evidently, everyone knew what happens to someone who crosseds a Clinton.

When the security sweep was made, the suite in question was still inside of a Diplomatic Security-controlled area, Kirby claimed, and under direct control of a Diplomatic Security agent posted outside the room.

"Ultimately, Diplomatic Security concluded that classified information had been improperly secured, but that the evidence did not support assigning culpability to any individual [which is a universal problem with Clinton and her ilk]. Furthermore, the Diplomatic Security investigation concluded that due to the fact that the documents were found within a Diplomatic Security controlled area, the liklihood that the information was comprised was remote."

Just like it was remote that Hillary Clinton's mobile devices and private server with classified state department emails would be compromised.

Leaving out classified or top secret information is a serious offense. 

"Diplomatic Security and the Marine Security Guard takes exposure of classified information very seriously," said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy research at the Center for Immigration Studies. "You can lose your security clearance if you're caught more than once, and that means you might lose your job. It's a big deal."

We wish Hillary Clinton would have taken it seriously and we all wonder if she does now.

In 2013, Monica Hanley, a top aide to then-Secretary of State Clinton, got into trouble with the agency's security and law enforcement when she lost classified information while accompanying Clinton on a diplomatic trip to Moscow, normally a friendly country not interested in our secrets. This little incident was also revisited by the FBI earlier this year when it looked into Hillary's own incompetence in handling sensitive data that could easily compromise national security.

Hanley was given a good talking to and "verbal counseling" by Diplomatic Security.

Personally, I believe Clinton should have her security clearance yanked and not be allowed to run for the presidency. Not only is she incompetent in dealing with classified information, she has compromised the integrity of her position as secretary of state and as a presidential candidate by accepting huge sums of money from foreign nations for her "charity front."

Tweet

Is it possible Hillary lies about everything all the time?

'Crooked' Hillary looking as tired as a wet breadstick

The State Department will now be turning over all of Hillary Clinton's planning schedules to the Associated Press from when she "served" as secretary of state. They should all be in the hands of the AP by mid-October and will outline all of Clinton's scheduling in great detail.

The documents will show a detailed view of Clinton's daily routine during her 4-year gig of flying a zillion miles and accomplishing systematic, record-breaking air pollution between 2009 and 2013. 

The State Department had previously provided the AP with some of Clinton's official calendars from her time in the department, but they were edited after the events, just in case the public wanted to actually know why we paid her salary. In some cases, names of those she met with were omitted but that may have just been a slip of the 'Delete' button.

So, for all we know, Hillary Clinton may have been working with ISIS and we'd never find out because they may have gone 'unlisted.'

I don't really believe Hillary was actually working for that terrorist organization, she and Obama simply helped them to flourish to where they are today.

To date, the State Department has released about half of Clinton's more complete daily schedules.

"As stated in today's court filing, the Department had no objection to shifting its resources as long as its overall processing burden was not increased," State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement. "Consequently, the Department plans to complete its production of former Secretary Clinton's schedules not later than October 17."

The original plan by the Democratic State Department was to release the schedule on December 30th, after the elections. However, the AP objected to the delay and, in spite of that media outlet's left-leaning predilections, it was in the Democrat's best interest to comply with the AP to avoid losing the support of the media.

It was noted that in the schedules which had been turned over, more than half the people outside of members of the U.S. or foreign governments that Clinton saw a secretary of state were donors to the Clinton Foundation. 

What the mainstream media did not note was that of all the emails recovered by the FBI from Clinton's illegal private server, none of them were about yoga lessons or Chelsea's wedding planning.

That brings up the possibility, remote as it may seem to the average liberal, that Hillary Clinton lied about every single issue that may have gotten her in legal, or, at the very least, political trouble. In fact, it is conceivable that Hillary Clinton lies whenever she speaks.



Tweet

Obama paid Iran $400 million ransom and "does a Clinton"

The Obama administration believes Americans are stupid as John Kerry and Marie Harf. They are claiming that the $400 million they airlifted to Iran this past January--the same day four American citizens being held hostage by the terror nation--had nothing to do with the release.

It's called ransom, regardless of what Josh Earnest and the other Obama liars tell you, and Republican lawmakers are angry.

Big deal--nothing will happen and over time, nobody will care. Our distraction to other political scandals will grab our attention. That's always what the left counts on and it works.

The money transfer was reported by the Wall Street Journal. The first installment paid out by the U.S. was reportedly $1.7 billion ostensibly to resolve a failed 1979 arms deal dating just prior to the Iranian Revolution.

The money we gave to Iran was in euro, Swiss francs and other currencies because our laws forbid transacting US dollars with Iran. So it's like giving them a Glock 9 mm to shoot us instead of a Colt 45 mm. 

Obama denied it was ransom, and John Kirby, spokesman for the State Department, said it was a coincidence. But anyone who is toilet-trained and can feed him-- or herself, should know better. 

Even Iran knows it was ransom. That's how they portrayed it to their people, and that's how their people see it.

"Paying ransom to kidnappers puts Americans even more at risk," Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said in a statement. "While Americans were relieved by Iran's overdue release of illegally imprisoned American hostages, the White House's policy of appeasement has led Iran to illegally seize more American hostages."

Kirby did his typical tap dance. "We don't pay ransom . . . this was not ransom," he lied. He then went on to add to the lie saying there was "no secret" about the payment.

Then why did we have to find out this way? Why didn't the Obama administration tell us the plan?


Tweet

Another American held by Iran: what will Obama do?

"We condemn the actions of [blank] in the strongest possible terms."

The Obama administration might as well create a template (or perhaps they already did)j to use whenever a foreign country does to our citizens whatever it wishes to do.

Our State Department said that it is looking into reports that another American has been detained in Iran ["U.S. Navy style"]. 

State Department spokesman John Kirby, a man who has traded his honorable past to become an Obama mouthpiece, would not comment on the detention of San Diego native Robin Shahini. 

Shahini's girlfriend said that his sister told her he was taken into custody on July 11th while visiting his mother who suffers from Alzheimer's disease. He has not been heard from since that time.

The girlfriend asked to remain anonymous as she has family in Iran and fears for their safety, unlike the Obama administration fearing for ours in light of the Iran nuclear deal. She believes he may have been detained because of his online comments criticizing Iran's deplorable human rights record. (Calling it human rights in Iran is an oxymoron.)

Secretary of State John Kerry declined to comment on the detention of Shahini because he obviously isn't sure how he feels about it or how his comments may effect the Iranian nuclear deal. After all, if he showed the Ayatollah he was upset with Iran kidnapping Americans, they might get mad and re-open the nuclear facilities they agreed to close--oh wait--they already did.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard, the elite military force whose duty is to protect the Islamic Republic (i.e., Iran) has been increasingly targeting Westerners ever since the nuclear deal was agreed to limit uranium enrichment in order to have the sanctions upon them lifted. Officials at the Interests Section of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Washington D.C. could not be reached for comment.

But you can bet that if and when Iran releases Shahini, John Kerry will thank them and Obama will apologize for inconveniencing the Islamic Republic.

Shahini, 46, left Iran in 1988 and lived in San Diego for 16 years. He graduated from San Diego State University with a degree in International Security and Conflict Resolution and had been accepted to the school's graduate program in Homeland Security. 

How ironic. He is neither secure nor has the conflict been resolved.

He left for Iran May 25th and his girlfriend communicated with him on July 19th but did not hear back from him the next day, as expected. She reached his family who told her that intelligence officials came to their home and removed him from the premises. They also searched the home and removed his personal belongings.

Shahini was to return to the U.S. July 25th and start classes in August.

A close friend, Denera Radoonanan, said he wasn't politically active in Iran. "I really don't know what could have caused this," she said.

Perhaps it's true: Iran really hates us no matter how hard Obama and Valerie Jarrett try to get them to like us.


Tweet

Kerry: all hair, no head

War hero, by his own admission, and current Secretary of State for not much longer, John Kerry has pleaded with the Syrian government forces to please stop bombing the city of Aleppo moving forward.

"At the end of the day, there's gonna be lots of dead civilians if you keep bombing indiscriminately, and that just is not good. It isn't good. It's bad. So please stop," Kerry begged in the short, powerful sentences he is known to lob at our enemies.

The bombing has been devastating this week, with heavy civilian casualties that included a Doctors Without Borders hospital that killed scores of people one of whom was one of the last pediatricians left in Syria.

Russia has sat on its collective hands, doing nothing to pressure chinless Assad's bombing campaign.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said the increased fighting has caused a humanitarian disaster for millions of people and issued a statement that four medical facilities on both sides of the city were hit by bombs. The ICRC appealed to both sides "for an immediate halt in the attacks."

Kerry is planning to have a sit-down with UN envoy Staffan de Mistura in Geneva on Sunday. He will include the foreign ministers of Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Interestingly, Aleppo was not part of the original "cessation of hostilities" agreement, so for Assad and Putin's way of thinking, "nobody said we couldn't."

Kerry uselessly expressed "deep concern" about Aleppo to de Mistura and Riad Hijab, the chief negotiator for the High Negotiations Committee.  The Secretary of State made it "crystal clear" that ending the violence in Aleppo and returning to a total nationwide ceasefire, would be 'tremendous'. 

Donald Trump, the frontrunner in the presidential race, said, "I really hope the shooting will stop. I really do. It would be fantastic if those folks could shake hands like men, and end this nonsense. They've got to end it. I mean, folks, it's crazy that people are killing each other over what? A crappy country that doesn't even allow beauty contests and the women, and I love the Syrian women, wear head scarfs in that heat? All those dead folks, and I love dead folks, are a total waste. So let's not do this anymore."

Kerry calmly disagreed with Russia's claim that the airstrikes were targeting Al Nusra in Aleppo. "Oh please, who are you kidding?" he said. "You are bombing civilians. You always bomb civilians. That's no right. That's not fair. That's not the American way."

The other State Department "John," Kirby this time, using longer sentences than Kerry said, "The Assad regime continues to escalate the conflict by predominantly targeting innocent civilians and parties to the cessation of hostilities--not Nusra, as the regime falsely claims. Such attacks are direct violation of the cessation and must stop immediately."

Both Putin and Assad chuckled and said in unison: "Oh yeah? Whattaya gonna do about it?"

What happens going forward, down the road, at the end of the day, remains a mystery. Will Obama allow Aleppo to be thrown under the bus is anybody's guess.



Tweet

Obama gives free pass to religious freedom violators

If you're an Islamic nation and not a direct enemy of the US, you're allowed to violate the religious freedom of non-Muslims because Obama said so, International Religious Freedom Act  (IRFA) be damned.

Thus, if you're a Christian in Saudi Arabia, and your Bible is discovered, the Islamic government can take it from you and burn it, as they do with all non-Islamic religious items entering the country. 

Obama and his Islamophiliacs have waived punitive restrictions for violating religious freedom in Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. But restrictions remain in place for Iran, Burma, China, Eritrea, North Korea and Sudan. The reason Obama's administration gave for the waivers is that national security concerns trumps the IRFA.

State Department spokes-puppet John Kirby said Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan would be re-designated as Countries of Particular Concern under the IRFA.

"These designations help us shine a spotlight on countries and conditions that require the international community's attention," Kirby said before going to the ground and facing Mecca. Then he got up and lied: "Today and every day, as you know, we are committed to working with governments and civil society organizations, and individuals to achieve our shared interest in promoting peace and stability through, in part, the promotion and protection of all human rights including religious freedom."

Of course this lie flies in the face of women in Muslim countries who are treated worse than cattle, and Christians who are often killed, their churches torched and gays who are thrown from buildings or beheaded by these theocratic countries, because that's what it says to do in the Koran.

But Kirby and his ilk lie for Obama and do it with a straight face.


Tweet

Secret talks by "President Transparency"

The "most transparent" administration ever in the United States secretly met with North Korea with the goal of formally ending the Korean War. 

In the past, we have had the condition that Pyongyang begin to curtail its nuclear arsenal. Obama has since dropped that condition because, evidently, he trusts North Korea to do the right thing even though they have been lax to do the right thing in the past. They scoff at agreements.

Now we are calling for their atomic-weapons program to simply be part of the negotiations, but Pyongyang flipped Obama off and went ahead with a nuclear test on January 6th.

In a weak attempt to save face, State Department spokespuppet John Kirby said, "To be clear, it was the North Koreans who proposed discussing a peace treaty. We carefully considered their proposal, and made clear that denuclearization had to be part of any such discussion."

North Korea rejected it. 

"Our response to the North Korean proposal was consistent with our longstanding focus on denuclearization," Kirby said.

It's obvious that North Korea respects us as much as Iran does., as much as the Middle East does. Even as much as our allies do. But along with the loss of respect under the Obama administration, comes lack of trust.

The next president is going to have to do a lot of global repair work and regain that trust and respect.

I cannot imagine that happening with a liberal government.


Tweet

Muslim attacks patrons in Israeli-theme restaurant: what could it be?

Columbus, Ohio -- a Muslim jihadist wielding a machete injured at least 4 people, one of them critically, in a restaurant where inside an Israeli flag is hung to greet patrons. The restaurant, called Nazareth, is owned by an Israeli Christian who makes no bones about being pro-Israel.

The attacker, whose first name is the most popular among all Muslims, Mohammad Barry, was shot and killed by police. 

Hamas and leftist college professors likely consider Mohammad Barry as a martyr for the cause.

Columbus police Sergeant Rich Weiner claims that "right now there's nothing that leads us to believe that this is anything but a random attack." 

Rich Weiner is a simple-minded dhimmie who honors the uniform of the police department like John Kerry and John Kirby honor the uniform of the United States Navy. 

At the very least, Sgt. Rich Weiner is as knowledgeable about Islam as Anthony Weiner is about loyalty. 

The fact that Mohammad Barry later lunged at the police should give Weiner a clue about the intent of this scumcrumpet: Jews, Christians and cops. It's part of their jihad--it's how jihadists roll.

The reason Israeli airlines rarely have terrorist incidents is because they can't afford the luxury of being politically correct and pretend young Muslim men and women should not be more carefully scrutinized than an 89-year-old nun from Little Sisters of the Poor in a wheelchair.

According to police, Mohammad walked into the Nazareth Restaurant and spoke with an employee, then left. About 30 minutes later he returned and approached a man and woman who sat in a booth near the entrance door. 

The jihadist started the attack at that time.

After he engaged in the Hamas-inspired fatwa he fled in a car going southwest when cops tried the PIT maneuver but were unsuccessful. But a short while later they had better luck and the jihadist slammed into a curb near Montclair Drive.

As cops surrounded the vehicle, Mohammad got out of the car with a knife in one hand and a machete in the other. Cops fired a taser at him but, like the PIT maneuver, it was unsuccessful. He lunged again across the hood of the car and that's when he was shot dead and sent on his way to Paradise.

No police officers were hurt in the shooting and the four victims were sent to the hospital where they are all expected to recover. 

Mohammad Barry had a Somali background and may have traveled to Dubai in 2012. Law enforcement is now saying that incidents like this appear to be the type of "lone wolf terrorist attacks they're trying to stop."

If you really think about it, there's no such thing as a "lone wolf attack" because the Islamic ideology that is feeding the wolf is becoming universal. The inspiration behind ISIS or ISIL is no different from that of Al Shabaab, Al Nusrah, Al Qaeda, the Taliban and Hamas. It's the jihad mentality found in the religion of peace, which it never, ever was.

The FBI is now assisting in the investigation. 


Tweet

Islamophobia is a sign of intelligence

How many people have to die at the hands of Islamic terrorism before Islamophobia is seen as a sign of intelligence?

When we hear someone shouting "Allahu Akbar!" it means several things: 1) Allah is great; 2) hit the deck; and 3) run like hell.

A deadly hostage situation at the Radisson Hotel in Bamako, Mali finally came to an end, but not after at least 27 people were murdered for no other reason than being an infidel in one way or another. Infidels are deemed as such if they are not Muslims; are Muslims of a different sect; are gay--whether Muslim or infidel; are lesbian--whether Muslim or infidel; and the list goes on.

John Kirby, the State Department spokesman who will say anything Obama orders him to say, announced the siege "has concluded." He said that about 12 Americans were rescued from the hotel and none were hurt.

Amadou Snagho, a Malian spokesman said that "They are alone with the Malian special forces who are trying to dislodge them," which is a fancy way of saying "Malian special forces are trying to kill them so dead they'll be in so many pieces that the 72 virgins will look for better prospects."

Al Qaeda (no relation to Al Gore, a fat guy who made quite a few bucks selling them Al Jazeer) are claiming responsibility for the Islamic jihadist attack.

It is beyond stupid to hear people like Juan Williams of Fox News try to convince viewers that these Islamic organizations are not really Islamic. They quote the Koran and if you get caught by one of these scumcrumpets, they make you recite a verse from the Koran or you die. I'm not clear as to whether you must already need to know a verse by heart, or they let you read from their "holy" book.

Maybe it's a test and they say to you: "Hey, you wanna live? Let's hear Sura 2: 5." And you go, "Then when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them (captive) and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free, Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."

You've studied the Koran and know your stuff--no way are they going to kill a believer.

But instead of letting you go free, they know you're one of them because you perfectly recited the "Sura of the Sword." So they give you a weapon, probably a Russian model Kalashnikov, and this is your golden opportunity to blow the dickwads away.

Of course it's about Islam. The terrorists are simply more religious, more orthodox, than the average Muslim. But until such time the average Muslim starts fighting against terrorists, or turn them in, or let authorities know about this kind of chatter in their mosque, I believe they must be watched just as carefully as the usual suspects.

One of the hotel guests said that the terrorists told him to recite a Koranic verse before he was allowed to leave--it doesn't get more Islamic than that, or are we conservatives missing something? Al-Mourabitoun, a militant group from Mali, is said to be behind the attack on the Radisson hotel. This has not yet been verified, but I'd bet dollars to gum that if not, then another Islamic group is.

Remember, a phobia is an irrational fear. Being afraid of people who would kill you for not being like them is a sign of intelligence, not irrational fear.


Tweet