Poll finds majority of Americans say Biden got "special treatment" in Special Counsel probe

Be aware, some of this content is satire. If you cannot tell what is real and what is satire, you're my kind of person.

A full 53% of Americans say that so called President Biden received "special treatment" in the Special Counsel probe that investigated his mishandling of classified documents, according to a new poll. 

Classified documents in Biden's possession go back to when he was a U.S. Senator. In that case he didn't have the authority to declassify them. There were classified documents also found by the White House when Biden was vice president at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C. and other classified documents found by Biden's personal attorneys that were stored in a locked closet at the think-tank. And we all know about the classified documents that were found in his garage, which his son, Hunter Biden, had assess to, and were visible to an observer when the garage door was open.

The searches for Biden's classified documents lasted nearly three months after the Penn Biden Center discovery.

Anyway, the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that beside the majority of Americans believe Biden got special treatment, about 29% of Democrats also agreed with that statement. 

The results from the poll comes after Special Counsel Robert Hur did not recommend charges against Biden for his blatant mishandling of classified documents, mainly because the cognitively impaired POTUS could present himself to a jury as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," [who is supposedly the leader of the most powerful country on Earth and whose decisions could prove catastrophic].

The Hur report mentions Biden's significant memory deficiencies, saying the old man couldn't even remember when his son, Beau, died, when he served as vice president, or Hunter's drug of choice. Sometimes he confuses his wife, Doctor Jill Biden, with his sister, Valerie, as their hair has a similar odor.

Biden, being an old-timer, along with what's left of his mental capacity, has become an issue for voters who pay attention. According to polls, most Americans believe he's too old to run for another term and the Reuter's poll showed similar results with about 78% polled saying he's too old to run again, and even 71% of Democrats agreed.

Robert Hur

Biden and his handlers poo-pooed concerns about his fitness for the presidency. DEI-hire White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Monday that Biden's upcoming physical exam will not included a cognitive test, "and look how the President is able to jog a few steps in public."

Jean-Pierre stated that Biden's physician, Dr. Kevin O'Connor, believes Biden proves his cognitive ability "every day [in] how he operates and how he thinks," which is why the nation is worried in the first place.

Biden himself attempted to laugh off his memory impairment on Monday, although he thought it was Tuesday. 

"Ha, ha, ha," he began. "My memory is like a steel trap--nothing can get in or out. I don't care what Ben Hur said about me, I'm fine."

Tweet

Our vegetable speaks: calls Netanyahu vulgar names in private then gets angry over his Snickers bar

In an effort to pander for the Muslim vote our alleged President, who now qualifies to have his likeness on paper money, has privately insulted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as per a recent report.

He also went on national tv to attack potato chip bags taking out a chip or two as a way to cope with Biden's economic clusterfrack of an outcome. Snickers too was on the list along with ice cream. He attacked corporate greed, not presidential incompetence, in spite of the fact that it is his policies that caused the economic decline [not to mention the social and moral decay we face].

Left-wing outlet NBC News reported Monday that our Vegetable-In-Chief is whining that Netanyahu is "giving him hell" despite his attempts to push for a cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war. 

One has to wonder what the United States would have done if a foreign nation, in the spirit of Hamas, attacked the country and killed our people. Oh wait, we bombed Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden, killing tens of thousands of Japanese and German civilians. I almost forgot.

"He just feels like this is enough," one secret source told NBC. "It has to stop."

"His descriptions of his dealings with Netanyahu are peppered with contemptuous references to Netanyahu as ‘this guy,’ these people said," NBC reported. "And in at least three recent instances, Biden has called Netanyahu an ‘a-----e,’ according to three of the people directly familiar with his comments."

A source told the Biden-supporting outlet that while Biden has said that he liked Netanyahu early in his speeches, more recently he has started to use harsher language about the Prime Minister, calling him "a pain in my ass" or that "he’s been killing me lately."

This is likely due to Biden's need for the Muslim vote as we saw him pander to the Michigan Muslims. They're upset with Biden because he was providing the Jewish State [oh dem Jews, dem terrible Jews] with military funding to fight the anti-Semitic Hamassholes, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other Iran-backed terrorists. 

NBC's report comes one day after Netanyahu said in an interview on ABC that Biden was "very clear and focused." Of course Bibi lied because late stage dementia doesn't improve or go into remission, it continues to eat at the brain, but he doesn't want to "rock the boat" that helps fun the IDF.

"I found him very clear and very focused," he said of Biden, who has faced increased criticism over his cognitive ability after Special Counsel Robert Hur released a controversial report on the president. Hur described Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Others describe him as meatloaf with dentures.

"We managed to agree on the war aims and many things. Sometimes we had disagreements, but they were not born of a lack of understanding on his part or my part," Netanyahu said as a way to schmooze Biden.

Biden spokes-cis-gender man Andrew Bates also shared a tweet of Netanyahu's remarks on his X account, hoping to dispel what people see and hear of the demented old man we call our own.

Biden has faced anti-Semitic/anti-Zionist pressure from within his party and even the White House itself to press for an immediate cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war now that the Jews are winning. 

Tweet

Biden vows to take Ben Hur "behind the barn" after Hur hurled truth bombs about him

Finger-sucking good

Alleged President Joe Biden was livid after learning that Special Counsel investigator Robert Hur reported that the president's memory was as reliable as a Hamas reported death toll. 

But when it was mentioned that Biden could not recall when his son, Beau, died, or when he was Vice President, Joe's wife, Doctor Jill Biden stepped in to defend him. She offered an explanation on Saturday for why Joe forgot when Beau died and said that Hur only wanted to score "political points," which makes no sense. 

She said that the grief of losing a son is not measured "in years." 

"We should give everyone grace, and I can’t imagine someone would try to use our son’s death to score political points," the elder abuser wife wrote in the email.

"If you’ve experienced a loss like that, you know that you don’t measure it in years -- you measure it in grief," she added. "Believe me, like anyone who has lost a child, Beau and his death never leave him."

Actually, when someone you love dies, you tend to remember when it was because of the deep impression it makes on your life. 

When Joe heard about the report Hur made, he went ballistic and mumbled at a press conference last week when reporters asked him about the Special Counsel report.

"Who the hell does this Ben Hur guy think he is?" Joe began. "I'll take him out behind the barn and beat his ass," the President of the United States mumbled. "And I'll do the same with that Mexican guy, Al Sissy."

He ended the presser by shaking hands with the jasmine of his mind.

Tweet

Biden and his crack team worry about Special Counsel's classified Doc report

Biden's crack team didn't worry back in November that special counsel Robert Hur was going to pursue charges against the alleged President for treating classified documents as if they were old magazines he was going to read when he had the time. But that seems like it's about to change.

The team is sweating bullets about Hur's soon to be released report. It could come as early as this week, as "they believe Hur's report will include embarrassing details — possibly with photos — on how Biden stored documents," according to an Axios report.

And while they don't expect Biden will be biding his time in the slammer, they know that there's a good likelihood that it will damage his political chances this November. [Like his dementia doesn't bother Democrats, nor does his open border policies.]

At the time when the Biden administration approved of a raid on former President Trump's home, where classified documents were KEPT IN A SECURE ROOM, with full knowledge of the National Archives, nobody knew that Biden also had classified documents stored on shelves in his garage, protected only by his Corvette. Biden tried to defend himself by saying, “[B]y the way, my Corvette is in a locked garage, so it’s not like they’re sitting out on the street.”

No joke.

In late 2022, the classified documents were found in Biden's private office at the Penn Biden Center as well as in his garage at home, but it didn't get reported until January 2023, after the midterm elections. Coverup much?

"Biden aides believe that Donald Trump, Biden’s likely foe in November, will try to use Hur’s report to create equivalency with the felony charges Trump faces related to his keeping classified documents after his presidency," Axios reports. "Biden aides believe Hur’s probe is done and that his final report could come any time — even as soon as this week — but the final timing is unclear."

Well, why wouldn't any political opponent use Hur's report if it's true and will win them an election?

Some of the documents must be yellowing by now as they go back to when he was a U.S. Senator when Lincoln was shot. More importantly, and this really is serious, at the time these were confiscated by Biden, he did not have the authority to declassify them and there is evidence his whoremonger, drug-addled son, Hunter, had access to them and potentially used them for foreign business leverage. 

In fact, some of the documents pertained to Ukraine. Hunter had emailed his former business partner, Devon Archer, and detailed 22 points of "research" on Ukraine, points that he probably would not have known without access to the classified documents.

So why in the world should Trump not use this scandal to his advantage?

Biden's team may not need to worry so much because it's doubtful his in-the-pocket DOJ will even release the report. Very doubtful.

Welcome to your latest republic. Please pass the bananas.

Tweet

Jake Sullivan involved in former Clinton shyster lawyer indictment

Jake "the Fake" Sullivan, Biden's  White House national security adviser, is the "foreign policy advisor" referred to in the John Durham Special Counsel indictment  of Michael Sussmann, the presidential lawyer for Hillary Clinton's campaign. Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI on Sept. 16 regarding his connection to the Clinton campaign. 

He has pleaded not guilty.

The Durham probe continues to shine a light on the Hillary campaign and is moving deeper into the Biden White House. Thus far, this is the closest Special Counsel John Durham's investigation  has come into the origins of the Russia investigation to anyone directly associated with the Biden-Harris White House.

The indictment alleges Sussmann told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a September 2016 meeting in which he provided evidence of a purported secret communications channel between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia.

In fact, Sussmann even billed the Clinton campaign for the meeting, according to Durham’s indictment. Subsequently, the FBI found the story of the alleged link between Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian bank to be complete balderdash.

And the legacy media doing yeoman's work for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party, either never checked their reporting or were lying through their capped teeth.

The indictment paints a picture where an unnamed Clinton campaign lawyer "exchanged emails with the Clinton Campaign’s campaign manager, communications director, and foreign policy advisor [Jake Sullivan] concerning the Russian Bank-1 allegations that Sussmann had recently shared," with an unnamed reporter, most likely from either CNN OR MSNBC. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

There is no indication that Sullivan is a target of Durham’s investigation, only that he received information from Sussmann. But if it turns out that he is a target, this will not bode well for Joe Biden's next term, if someone decides for him that he should run.

Additionally, the Durham indictment alleges that Sussmann was working on behalf of a tech industry executive, an American internet company and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

Prosecutors say Sussmann's "lie" is important because it "misled the FBI General Counsel and other FBI personnel concerning the political nature of his work."

Another grand jury indictment was returned on Nov. 4 for Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who is accused of being the primary sub-source in the creative work of political theater known as the Steele Dossier. He is charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI and his next court appearance is scheduled for Wednesday.

BleachBit may be sponsoring the Democrats' next presidential election campaign.



Tweet

Missing Flynn document in Mueller file could be a problem in sentencing

A key document from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's latest filing regarding the [former national security adviser] Michael Flynn case could be a problem at Tuesday's scheduled sentencing hearing.

Special counsel has been ordered to turn over all government documents and "memoranda" related to Flynn's questioning by the FBI after his attorneys claimed the agency had discouraged him form having a lawyer present when he was interviewed on January 24, 2017 at the White House. It appears that U.S. District Judge Emmett G. Sullivan is rather miffed over the missing document.

Mueller met Sullivan’s Friday afternoon deadline and provided documents, some of which were heavily redacted.

Mueller's team defended the way the FBI handled the interview with Flynn and claimed that nothing about how it was conducted "caused the defendant to make false statements to the FBI." How they could get into Flynn's mind and know that was the case had not been revealed, but evidently, the FBI has some scary stuff going and can read minds.

The filing in question, known as a "302", [to memorialize interviews] detailed the July 19, 2017 interview with Peter Strzok, the paramour of Lisa Page.

Strzok, who was in the throes of an extra-marital affair with a lawyer for the FBI, Lisa Page (whose affair with Strzok was also extra-marital) was one of two agents performing the interview. It was revealed that Strzok and his paramour were texting each other over their hatred for Trump and Strzok wanted to do something to stop him. Since Flynn worked for Trump, there was no love lost between Strzok and Flynn, in which case the former could direct all his love to Page. Anyway, Flynn described the meeting in the document filed Aug. 22, 2017.

If this sounds confusing, imagine having to go through life with a name that's spelled "Strzok" but pronounced "Schmuck."

But not included in the filing was an original 302 from the period of the January 2017 Flynn interview.

Anyway, we shall see tomorrow whether Flynn is handed down a sentence, walks away a free man, or has a sentencing delay.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Manafort sent to the slammer

Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was sent to the slammer Friday after a federal judge revoked his $10 million bail. New witnesses tampering charges were brought by Special Counsel Robert "Gonna Git Trump" Mueller.

Washington, D.C. Federal District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Manafort to jail pending his trial moment before pleading not guilty to the charges brought against him and his Moscow associate Konstantin Kilimnik.

Mueller accused the dynamic duo of obstructing justice in the Russian meddling investigation and potential collusion with Trump campaign associates in 2016.

Mueller alleged in a filing last week that Manafort and Kilimnik "knowingly and intentionally attempted to corruptly persuade another person . . . with intent to influence, delay, and prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding."

This third superseding indictment against Manafort came days after the special counsel accused him of witness tampering, which is almost as bad as a high ranking government official keeping an illegal private server with highly classified material on it in a Colorado toilet.

Manafort's spokesman said that the former Trump operative was "innocent." And even Manafort, 69, has also maintained his innocence.

They're always innocent.

The spokesman, Jason Maloni, said that Manafort and his team of lawyers were reviewing the new charges. "Mr. Manafort is innocent and nothing about the latest allegation changes our defense," Maloni said. "We will do our talking in court."

Court documents state that Manafort reached out to potential witnesses in February after his superseding indictment was unsealed and allegedly tired to make at least three phone calls and send two encrypted text messages to a potential witness "in an effort to secure materially false testimony . . ." the special counsel claimed.

The court documents state that the potential witness was trying to avoid contact with Manafort and "understood Manafort's outreach to be an effort to 'suborn perjury.'"

Like those who oppose President Trump, there's a special place in hell for people who witness tamper.


Tweet

Sanders mum on claim Russians backed his presidency

Photo: Getty Images

Sen. Bernie Sanders (Socialist-VT) decided it was wise to stay mum on the Russian indictment situation and claims by the FBI that the Russians backed him in the 2016 presidential primaries against Hillary Clinton while trying to sink her campaign hopes [that she believed were her rights].

"It has been clear to everyone (except Donald Trump) that Russia [where he went on his honeymoon] was deeply involved in the 2016 elections and intends to be involved in the 2018 elections," Sanders said in a statement. "It is the American people who should be deciding the political future of our country, not Mr. Putin and the Russian oligarchs. It is absolutely imperative that the Mueller investigation be allowed to go forward without obstruction from the Trump administration or Congress."

That's like saying Sanders should not beat his wife nor kick babies. Nobody is stopping the investigation and Bernie is just trying to blow smoke.

But how long does the Mueller special counsel investigation need to go on? 

I believe that while the FBI said that there was no evidence of collusion with the Trump campaign and the 13 Russians who were indicted for messing with the election process, that doesn't prove anything. That said, it appears more fruitful for the special counsel to look into the Clinton campaign, the FBI and the DNC in the matter of the Steele dossier on Trump.

Sanders urged that Mueller's special counsel be protected, and I agree with the statement, but don't see how it isn't being protected. Even Trump has said he supports Mueller.

Yet isn't it remarkable that the news of the 13 Russians involved in screwing around with the 2016 presidential campaigns came out a mere 40 minutes prior to our learning that the FBI knew about the Parkland, Florida shooter long before he went on the shooting rampage? 

The FBI knew about what Russia was doing since 2014.

And we know that former President Obama tried (unsuccessfully) to undermine Israel's election against Benjamin Netanyahu, because Obama was, and is, anti-Israel and pro-Islam.

The Mueller indictment said that the efforts by the Russians included "operations primarily intended to communicate derogatory information about Hillary Clinton, to denigrate other candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and to support Bernie Sanders and then-candidate Donald Trump."

Hillary Clinton hasn't yet commented on the indictments but it's a good bet she's going to imply that this was why she lost, rather than looking in the mirror that she wiped with a cloth to clean it.



Tweet

Dems make stuff up over prospect of Mueller firing

What if the Trump administration fires Robert Mueller? What if the one third of the American public who don't know who Robert Mueller is found out that he's leading the Special Counsel investigating the Russian collusion delusion?

But worst of all, what if President Trump, who said that he will not be firing Mueller, actually does not fire Mueller?

There will be a tremendous explosion of Democratic heads all throughout the land.

Those who are familiar with the relationship between Mueller's office and President Trump's legal team say that Democrats are "manufacturing a crisis" over the possibility of Mueller getting fired. 

These same sources assert that Mueller is not going to be fired and the discussion is nothing more than spit-balling and tweets on the streets. In fact, they say Trump's legal team has an "excellent" and "very professional" relationship with Mueller and his team.

"The fact is [Democrats] have been caught red-handed manufacturing a crisis and all the phony allegations," one source told Fox News.

It was the Democratic lawmakers and liberal activists who warned of Mueller's potential firing and they called for protests, just in case their delusions came true, to defend the "Republic" if Trump actually does what he say he isn't going to do.

Mueller's probe is appropriately called a 'probe' because it's similar to a proctology exam that finds little of value and mostly waste in both time and substance. 

The GOP is frustrated over the probe, but let's be clear: Trump was pretty emphatic is his denial that he would fire the Vietnam war hero, man of great character, a fair and balanced man, a professional who could do no wrong in the eyes of the Democrats, just as long as he eventually finds something negative on Trump so that they can finally impeach him and then go after Mike Pence.

Sure there's reason to ditch Mueller. Complaints have pointed to the disclosure of anti-Trump text messages between two FBI investigators on Mueller's team who sound as if they planned to do something to thwart Trump's presidency if he should beat Hillary Clinton.

For the one third of Americans who apparently don't know who Mueller is, they should also be informed that Donald J. Trump actually defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election, which make Trump our president. They should also be informed that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. 

But despite denials from the Trump team, special ed Democrats still don't get the message. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Duh-Ill.) comes to mind. He's the low functioning Democrat who, when he appears on Fox News, doesn't allow the conservatives to finish a sentence. 

Gutierrez wrote a letter with the help of Spell Checker and Grammarly advising the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee to be prepared to call the panel back to Washington--and consider impeachment--if Trump ousts Mueller.

"Every Democrat on the Judiciary Committee should be ready to launch an immediate investigation into obstruction of justice if the President takes this action over the holidays and be prepared to fight to impeach him," the idiot wrote, obviously not understanding the criteria for the obstruction of justice and the president's official rights in his position.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D.-NY) spoke Thursday through his nostrils: "If the president were to fire special counsel Mueller, our country would face a constitutional crisis."

And if the president were to shoot Mike Pence in order for the Speaker of the House to take his place, we would face a constitutional crisis. But President Trump has assured us he would not shoot Mr. Pence nor fire Mr. Mueller. 

Sheesh!

What a bunch of stooges.

Tweet

More Clinton ties on Mueller's team

More Clinton connections have come into the sunlight for members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe as Republican complaints about potential bias inside the office of the investigative team.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that Mueller investigator Andrew Weissmann, attended Hillary Clinton's election night party at the Javits Center in New York City last November. Weissmann is a former partner at WilmerHale.

You may recall that Weissmann's the guy who in January praised outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who was fired for refusing to defend President Trump's travel ban. He had also donated thousands of dollars to former President-from-behind Obama's campaign and the DNC.

Now, at least two Mueller investigators' past legal work for Clinton-tied liberals are getting careful scrutiny as Republicans search for signs of bias.

Aaron Zebley, another former WilmerHale partner, and a former chief of staff to Mueller when he served as FBI director, represented Justin Cooper, a significant person in the Hillary Clinton illegal email scandal for which she was never brought to justice. [Just sayin'].

Cooper is the Bill Clinton aide responsible for helping set up the illegal private email server and later admitted to "two instances where he destroyed [Hillary] Clinton's mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer."

He too has escaped justice and is walking the streets of Washington, D.C. in his swamp boots.

Jeannie Rhee, another former partner at WilmerHale, represented Ben Rhodes, an ex-Obama National Security Adviser. She also represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case. And hey, she even represented Hillary herself, in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.

"You've got Donald Trump being prosecuted by Hillary Clinton's fan club--that's inequitable," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R.-Fl.) a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News on Friday. "Many of the members of Mueller's team donated to the Clinton campaign. We have a lot of highly qualified federal prosecutors in the Justice Department and we could have found a bunch of them who didn't donate to either candidate. But that didn't occur, and that's troubling."



Tweet

GOPers allege DOJ 'double standard' in Mueller probe

There are allegations by Republicans of anti-Trump bias within Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigative team and that a "double standard" exists at the Justice Department. 

GOP critics say that Hillary Clinton received "special" treatment when she was under so-called investigation over her illegal personal email server when she was the incompetent secretary of state. 

"Hillary Clinton gets special justice, and at the same time we're siccing people who hate the president . . . on him and that's deeply unfair," Rep. Matt Gaetz (R.-Fla.) told "Fox & Friends" Wednesday.

Gaetz and other House Republicans now want the FBI Director Christopher Wray to investigate the FBI's treatment of Clinton and then-candidate Trump during the 2016 campaign, and compare them. 

Gaetz has specifically sought information on former FBI head Andrew McCabe who said in an email last fall that the Clinton case was referred to as "special." And what we have recently learned about Mueller's team of liberal Hillary donors and Trump-haters, only adds to these concerns.

It was just learned this past weekend that FBI official Peter Strzok (pronounced "Strzhzhokztlmfk") was removed from the Mueller probe over the summer after he allegedly sent anti-Trump texts to his mistress, an FBI lawyer.

This past Tuesday, Judicial Watch, a conservative advocacy group, released an email showing a Mueller deputy singing the praises of outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates after Trump fired her in January for refusing to defend his travel ban.

The Mueller deputy, Andrew Weissmann wrote in an email to Yates:

"I am so proud. And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects."

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the Weissmann document an "astonishing and disturbing find."

President Trump called the Strzok views regarding his role in the Clinton email investigation as "tainted" and "very dishonest." It could have been worse--President Trump could have called it "very, very dishonest."

Strzok oversaw the FBI interviews with Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. Hillary Clinton and her minions also lied to the FBI, but they are "special."

Strzok (aka "Petey Consonants") was also present during the July 2016 interview with wicked Hillary at the close of the email investigation, right before James Comey, the then-FBI showboat director, called her grossly negligent actions "extremely careless." Because of this wording, he recommended no criminal charges.

Gaetz called that a "double standard" and joined other House GOPers who also want answers to what role Strzok played in the controversial anti-Trump dossier. He called for cleaning out the "deep state" of people "who are so biased against Donald Trump."

Remember, both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills didn't get charged with lying to the FBI when they told them they were unaware of Clinton's private server when, in fact, there were email exchanges between the three stooges.

Special Counsel spokesman Peter Carr claimed Mueller's office removed Strzok from the Russia probe "immediately upon learning of the allegations" of the anti-Trump texts.

In a separate issue, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) has threatened a contempt resolution against leaders in the Justice Department and FBI if they continue to withhold key information related to the dossier and other issues. 

The DOJ is in the process of handing over Strzok's anti-Trump text messages. The agency also contacted the office of House Speaker Paul Ryan to establish a date for Strzok's appearance before the House Intelligence  Committee staff. There will also be two additional witnesses who had been sought after by the Nunes team.

A DOJ spokeswoman said Sunday that the agency will "continue to work with congressional committees to provide the information they request consistent with our national security responsibilities."

And if they do, chickens will darken the sky.


Tweet

House Republicans prepare contempt actions v FBI, DOJ

Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

The U.S. House of Representatives said Saturday that they will draft a contempt of Congress resolution against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray. The claim is that they stonewalled in producing material in the Russia-Trump probes and other matters.

It is believed that Rosenstein has an old photo of Hillary Clinton on the ceiling above his bed, according to my investigative reporter Vinny Boombots, and corroborated by ABC's Brian Ross.

"Unless all our outstanding demands are fully met by close of business on Monday, December 4, 2017, the committee will have the opportunity to move this resolution before the end of the month," said Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, in a statement.

This action has been under consideration by Nunes along with other Intelligence Committee Republicans for several weeks, but Democrats want to see Rosenstein and Wray get away with the stonewalling, much like Jose Garcia Zarate got away with the murder of Kate Steinle. 

Dems say "You wouldn't understand . . . it's a liberal thing."

The action is moving forward after press reports Saturday revealed why a top FBI official was removed from the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller. 

Specifically, it was Peter Strzok who was the FBI agent taken off the investigation after it was discovered he exchanged anti-Trump, pro-Hillary Clinton text messages with his mistress, Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer working for Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe.

Thus far, Nunes said the FBI and DOJ have failed to sufficiently comply with the August 24th committee subpoena by specifically refusing repeated demands "for an explanation of Peter Strzok's dismissal from the Mueller probe."

Strzok was also involved in the Clinton illegal private server investigation, so the relationship of both cases is very sketchy and smells like an old Democratic congressman in heat.

"In light of today's press reports, we now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously refused to make Deputy Director McCabe available to the Committee for an interview," Nunes said.

Nunes continued: "By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress' constitutional oversight responsibility."

Nunes said that this has been part of "a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee's oversight work," and also withholding subpoenaed information about their use of an opposition research dossier targeting President Trump in the 2016 election. 

The dossier was paid for by both the DNC and Clinton through a law firm. Nunes and Speaker Ryan want to investigate to see whether the DOJ and FBI improperly relied on the dossier to begin their federal surveillance on Trump and his associates without independently confirming the information they received in the dossier to justify such spying.

"The DOJ has now expressed--on Saturday, just hours after the press reports on Strzok's dismissal appeared--sudden willingness to comply with some of the Committee's long-standing demands," Nunes said. "This attempted 11th-hour accommodation is neither credible nor believable, and in fact is yet another example of the DOJ's disingenuousness and obstruction." He then added that those agencies "should be investigating themselves."


Tweet

Mueller dismisses FBI agent in probe over anti-Trump texts

Robert Mueller has dismissed FBI agent Peter Strzok (pronounced "Ski" by his friends) from the special counsel for the Justice Department's Russia collusion probe. The reason for the dismissal is reportedly due to anti-Trump tweets, Fox News has confirmed.

Strzok is one of the most experienced and trusted counterintelligence investigators of the agency according to the New York Times, which first reported the story.

The Justice Department's inspector general began examining Strzok's messages when the anti-Trump sentiments came to light. 

"Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel's Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation," a Mueller spokesman, Peter Carr, confirmed to Fox News.

Thankfully, Brian Ross of ABC News was not involved with the story as he likely would have blamed President Trump for sending anti-Strzok tweets rather than the other way around.

Photo: Getty Images

Strzok also worked on the FBI investigation last year into the possible mishandling of classified information of Hillary Clinton through her use of an illegal private email server which apparently wasn't illegal enough for Comey to recommend an indictment. 

While working on the Clinton investigation, Strzok was allegedly involved in an extra-marital affair with Lisa Page, an FBI attorney who cheats. An article by  Heavy.com lists five facts about the couple that you might want to know.

"Lisa Page completed her brief detail and had returned to the FBI weeks before our office was aware of the allegations," Carr sais in his statement, but it wasn't known to which allegations he was referring--possobly the anti-Trump tweeting.

Strzok was reportedly reassigned over the summer from the Mueller investigation to the FBI's human resources department, a clear demotion akin to being assigned to grease-pit cleaning duty at a Popeye's Restaurant. 

A lawyer for Strzok declined to comment.


Tweet