Obama appointed judge fired over sex scandal

FOX Business contributor Katrina Campins broke down the mess of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis's personal relationship with Nathan Wade on Jesse Watters Primetime.U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon dropped a motion on Friday to get Atlanta U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross tossed from a major election integrity case. Why? Because Ross admitted she went to a partisan Democrat fundraiser for Fani Willis, which is flat out illegal and screams she is anything but impartial.

But that is just the warm up for Ross's greatest hits album of judicial disgrace. 

Turns out that Ross, who is married, has been carrying on for years banging Atlanta deputy police chief Kelley Collier right there in her chambers during work hours. Staff overheard the sexual noises. When she got caught, she lied about it and then retaliated against the people who reported her.

This is textbook workplace sexual misconduct, lying, and obstruction of justice, folks. 

And what did the federal judiciary do about it? Gave her a freaking private reprimand. Yes, a private reprimand. That is the judicial equivalent of a participation trophy for being a sleazy embarassment. Ross should resign immediately or get impeached by Congress. She should also face federal criminal charges for lying to investigators.

The Atlanta Police Department has tons of cases in front of Ross's court. 

Collier, her regular courthouse hookup, is a nearly thirty year veteran who runs the Community Services Division and, oh yeah, he is also married. 

The Eleventh Circuit Judicial Council actually said it was only by pure happenstance that Ross never got assigned any cases from that division while she was banging the deputy chief. Relying on luck to avoid a screaming conflict of interest does not make you ethical. It makes you lucky and gross. Nothing indicates she would have ended the affair if a case had landed on her desk. 

Ross is  married to DeKalb County Circuit Judge Brian Ross. I wonder how he's taking it.

This went on right under the noses of her law clerks, young lawyers who were supposed to look up to her as a role model as opposed to a "Fans Only" woman. One former clerk had to blow the whistle to disciplinary authorities. She turned her fancy judicial chambers into a cheap love shack for several years, from 2023 until 2025. 

When staff pushed back on her illegal behavior, she cursed them out. Retaliating against whistleblowers has zero place in the federal judiciary.

Ross, an Obama appointee, also showed up at the victory party for Fani Willis, the same legal train wreck who brought that ridiculous, politically motivated indictment against President Trump and nearly twenty other defendants in 2023. Courts eventually booted Willis after it came out she was sleeping with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. 

Judges are not supposed to attend these partisan Democrat love clusterfracks. Ethical canons exist for a reason.

Ross showed zero integrity when Eleventh Circuit Chief Judge William Pryor confronted her. She flat out denied everything and called the allegations outrageous. She knew she was lying through her teeth. If a lawyer pulled that stunt in court, they would be disbarred and possibly prosecuted for contempt. But the Judicial Council went soft on Ross, kept the reprimand private, and refused to name her. That lack of transparency is garbage. The public has every right to know which judge is abusing her office, lying about it, retaliating, and trying to cover it up. 

She is a caught liar with no business on the federal bench. This fiasco is exactly why Congress needs to pass Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley's bill for an independent inspector general over the federal judiciary. These judges cannot police themselves, and for one in particular, don't even mention the word 'police,' it gets her all steamy hot.

Her eventual confession changes nothing. 

The council made her skip being chief judge of the Northern District and say sorry to the staff she screwed over. Big whoop. These are pathetic slaps on the wrist. As it stands, Ross keeps collecting that sweet lifetime federal paycheck and benefits. Other judges with half a spine have resigned over less. She should do the same. The Justice Department needs to prosecute her, and the House should impeach her.

Funny how Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff has been completely MIA on this. 

Ross sits on the bench in his home state. Her antics have humiliated the Northern District of Georgia, the whole state, and the federal judiciary. Ossoff, a full-blown coward, has not called for her resignation, has not demanded transparency, and has not said a single public word about why they shielded her from accountability. That silence is deliberate, and Georgians should remember it come election time. 

Ross is a complete disgrace to the judiciary. She should slink away with whatever dignity she has left and be replaced by someone who understands that judicial chambers are not a Motel 6 for afternoon delights that the whole staff has to hear. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee, where Ossoff ought to be leading the charge instead of playing hide and seek, should demand answers on why her name stayed secret. Most important, the Justice Department needs to open a criminal investigation into the false statements she made to Pryor and her obstruction of justice. The judiciary and the country deserve way better than Eleanor Ross.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Judge blocks Fani Willis [again] from collapsed RICO case as Trump fights to regain millions

A Fulton County judge just delivered another stinging defeat to the left's favorite partisan prosecutor, Fani Willis. 

In a ruling handed down Monday, Judge Scott McAfee barred Willis from inserting herself into the ongoing battle over reimbursing President Donald Trump and his co-defendants for the millions in legal fees they racked up fighting her now-dead racketeering case.

The judge made it crystal clear: since Willis was already "wholly disqualified" from the prosecution thanks to her improper romantic entanglement with lead prosecutor Nathan Wade, she has no business sticking her nose into this reimbursement fight. The defendants are seeking around $16.8 million under a 2025 Georgia state law that allows recovery of fees when prosecutors get booted for misconduct. Trump alone wants more than $6.2 million back from Willis' office.This is a solid win for Trump in his long-running clash with Willis, whom he has repeatedly blasted as a "rabid partisan" running a "witch hunt."

The defendants, charged by Willis with scheming to illegally flip Georgia's 2020 election results, are leaning on that new law to get their money back after the case imploded.

Fulton County could still be on the hook since the cash would come from the county budget, but Willis' team insisted she deserved a seat at the table.

"Without intervention by the District Attorney, any award would violate basic fundamental notions of due process by denying her an opportunity to be heard or even challenge the reasonableness of the claimed attorney fees before it is taken from her budget," her lawyers argued in court filings.

Trump's lead attorney, Steve Sadow, wasted no time calling the ruling spot-on.

"Judge McAfee has properly denied DA Willis' motion to intervene in POTUS' action for reimbursement of attorney fees because her disqualification for improper conduct bars Willis and her office from any further participation in this dismissed, lawfare case," Sadow said in a statement.

Willis launched her massive RICO indictment against Trump and 18 co-defendants back in August 2023, claiming they conspired to mess with the 2020 election. But the case steadily unraveled, plea deals, dropped charges, and suffered its fatal blow in 2024 when the Georgia Court of Appeals disqualified Willis over her secret relationship with Wade, creating an obvious conflict of interest.

That kicked the case over to the Georgia Prosecuting Attorneys' Council, whose director, Peter Skandalakis, moved to dismiss everything.

"In my professional judgment, the citizens of Georgia are not served by pursuing this case in full for another five to ten years," Skandalakis said.

McAfee signed off on the dismissal, and with this latest order, Willis is officially sidelined from the cleanup fight too. Another chapter closes on one of the most politicized prosecutions in recent memory.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Tweet

Fani Willia loses her stuff, even pulls race card when GA Senate Committee questions her re: Trump case

The Fani Willis circus is back in town, and it's a clown car riding over a cliff.

Last time we checked in on this ongoing Democrat disaster, the ridiculous election interference case against President Donald Trump had finally been put out of its misery and officially dropped last month. That came after Willis got herself booted off the thing last year for her, ahem, "improper" romantic entanglements.

Trump scored a massive victory there, but Willis is still knee-deep in her own mess. She finally got dragged in front of a Georgia state Senate committee to answer for her antics in that witch hunt.

And let me tell you, she was not thrilled to be under the spotlight on Wednesday. She had multiple meltdowns as they grilled her, starting with questions about how much cash her boyfriend-turned-special-prosecutor Nathan Wade raked in like he had a money printing press.

Willis claimed she didn't review the invoices Wade submitted, but that she "allowed him to bill 160 hours a week." Yes, 160 hours a week. Funny, there are only 168 hours in a week so it looks as if not much sleep was had by Wade, or maybe he was just padding the bill.

She praised him for showing up first every day and straightening out the slackers in the office. (Why exactly did they need that kind of "correction"?)

Then Willis completely lost her stuff: "Why don't you investigate how many times they called me the 'n word'?" she ranted. She insisted she didn't review those invoices and dodged giving a clear answer on who did.

(Reports say she later "corrected" that 160 hours a week slip to 160 hours a month—nice recovery, Fani—but it sure showed how rattled she was getting. Wade reportedly pocketed around $700,000 while he was on the gig.)

Willis feigned anger again when pressed on Wade's involvement in meetings.

She demanded they show her whatever Wade had said about it. "I don't really trust you," she snapped at the committee, using indignation to mask her behavior.

She went completely off the rails at one point, accusing the senators of "trying to intimidate me."You think that you're going to intimidate me! You all have been trying to intimidate me for five years, which is why I have not been able to live in my house for five years, because the n word has been written on my house!"

Again, the indignation ploy.

She even took a swipe at Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), declaring she wasn't going to "quit in a month." (Greene's heading out of Congress next month, by the way.) Sure, Willis hasn't quit, but she got disqualified, and the Trump case got tossed. Maybe keep the victory laps to yourself, lady.

On questions about contacts between her team and the Jan. 6 Committee, she stayed vague, like a politician.

Jan. 6 committee letter: Willis acknowledged a Dec. 17, 2021, letter (with her signature) seeking documents from the Jan. 6 committee; she said she recalled no nonpublic documents being provided and said she has never met Rep. [Bennie] Thompson [the J6 committee chair].

D.C. trip acknowledged, purpose vague: Willis confirmed Wade and staff traveled to Washington and said it was connected to "this investigation," but she said she could not recall the purpose or who they spoke with, a case of convenient amnesia.

Bottom line: Willis somehow managed to come out of this hearing looking even worse than she went in—and that's really saying something. The gift that keeps on giving from the left's lawfare playbook.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. Imagine, you could be the first on your block to do that and your friends will thank you . . . for some reason.

Tweet

Fani Willis ordered to pay $54,000 for violating open records laws

You remember Fani (pronounced "Fanny") Willis. She is the Fulton County District Attorney who violated the state's open record laws in the prosecution of U.S. President Donald Trump. Now she has been ordered to pay $54,264 for violating those laws.

The money Willis was ordered to pay is for attorney's fees and litigation costs after she "intentionally" failed to provide records requested by attorney Ashleigh Merchant, who filed a motion to disqualify Willis from prosecuting Trump on charges that he allegedly interfered with the 2020 presidential election.

The county’s Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause formalized her ruling Friday,  stating that Willis’ office failed to provide documents related to the employment of Nathan Wade, the former special assistant district attorney forced to resign from the Trump case due to his romantic relationship with Willis.

Merchant believed that Willis and Wade may have financially benefited from Wade’s appointment as the special prosecutor in the case as they went on lavish vacations together and bought expensive items that pointed to Willis' sneaky miscreant behavior.

"Defendants — through the Open Records custodian, Dexter Bond — were openly hostile to counsel for Plaintiff, Ms. Merchant, and testified that Ms. Merchant's requests were handled differently than other requests," the court order said, as reported by Fox News Digital.

Bond, who testified that his usual practice was to call a requestor to receive additional information to fulfill requests, indicated that he refused to communicate with Merchant by telephone, according to the order. 

Highly suspicious.

"While there is no requirement under the ORA for Mr. Bond to call any requestor about a particular request, Mr. Bond's handling of Ms. Merchant's requests in this manner indicates a lack of good faith," the order said. "Defendants’ failures were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious."

Dexter then went on to become a serial killer--just kidding.

Ms. Merchant, who reacted to the ruling in a post on X Friday, said she was "proud that we have judges willing to hold people in power accountable when they ignore the law!!!!"

If you would like to support my work, you can Buy Me A Coffee or subscribe. Thank you.

The DA’s office has 30 days from the court’s order to pay the penalty. The plaintiff also received injunctive relief directing Willis to finally provide the requested documents.

It's high time this arrogant DA got what she deserves.

Tweet

Court rules that GA lawmakers can subpoena Fani Willis for information related to Trump case

A Georgia judge has ruled that state lawmakers can subpoena Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis as part of an inquiry regarding whether she engaged in misconduct during her prosecution of President-elect Donald Trump.

In his Dec. 23 order, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shukura Ingram gave Willis until Jan. 13 to file a list of claimed privileges and objections to anything that has been subpoenaed.

Willis plans to appeal the decision. "We believe the ruling is wrong and will appeal," former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes, who is representing Willis in the case, wrote in an email to The Associated Press.

Earlier this month, an appeals court removed Willis from the Georgia election interference case against Trump and others, citing an "appearance of impropriety." The panel also cited the romantic relationship between Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

"This is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings," the court said.

At the time, Trump called the case a "disgrace to justice." "It was started by the Biden DOJ as an attack on his political opponent, Donald Trump," he said, "They used anyone and anybody, and she has been disqualified, and her boyfriend has been disqualified, and they stole funds and went on trips."

In August, the Republican-led Senate committee sent subpoenas to Willis seeking to compel her to testify in September. She skipped a hearing that month when lawmakers hoped to question her.

The committee was formed to examine misconduct allegations against Willis during her prosecution of Trump over efforts to overturn the former president’s 2020 election loss in Georgia.

Barnes, Willis’ attorney, argued the subpoenas were overly broad and not related to a legitimate legislative need and that the Senate committee didn't have the power to subpoena her in the first place.

One issue raised is that the Georgia legislative term will end when lawmakers are sworn in for their new term on Jan. 13. Republican state Sen. Greg Dolezal said last week that he plans to file legislation to re-establish the committee at the beginning of the 2025 legislative session.

"The law is clear, and the ruling confirms what we knew all along," Dolezal wrote in a text Friday. "Judge Ingram rejected every argument made by Willis in her attempt to dodge providing testimony to the committee under oath. I look forward to D.A. Willis honoring the subpoena and providing documents and testimony to our committee."

Tweet

Fani Willis ordered to turn over communication with Special Counsel Jack Smith, J6 Committee

Fani [aka Fanny] Willis is to the American justice system as Al Sharpton is to Reverends.

A Georgia Superior Court on Tuesday found Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in default for not providing records requested by Judicial Watch related to her communications with Special Counsel jack "Get Trump" Smith's office or those regarding the J6 rally.

Judicial Watch (JW) sued Willis under the Open Records Act (ORA) and the court granted the default judgment motion JW filed.

The motion said the lawsuit against Willis was filed in March 2024, but by May, when Judicial Watch asked the court for a default judgment, Willis still hadn't responded. She was supposed to file an answer within 30 days of being served, which was on March 11. Although the proof of service was filed just two days after that, it didn't show up in the court's online records. Because of this, the court thought Willis hadn't been served yet, so in April, they ordered Judicial Watch to serve her again. Judicial Watch then resubmitted the proof that Willis was indeed served on March 11 (Post Millennial).

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must forfeit any and all communications with Special Counsel Jack Smith and House Democrats' Jan. 6 Committee, a state judge ruled on Tuesday.

In his six-page order, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney ruled that Willis is "in default" for failing to file court documents responding to a legal challenge brought by Judicial Watch.

The conservative watchdog group filed a lawsuit against Willis in March after the Democrat district attorney denied having any of the records the group sought in an August 2023 open records request. That request aimed to obtain communications between her office and the special counsel and/or the Jan. 6 Committee.

“We’ve been doing this work for 30 years, and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records lawsuit,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “Judicial Watch looks forward to getting any documents from the Fani Willis operation about collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”

Now let's hurry up and wait to see what will transpire. Many people think Willis needs to go. 

What do you think? 

Fani Willis must pay Trump co-defendant's lawyer after ruling

On Tuesday, the Georgia Supreme Court made a decision that allows a lawyer for one of Donald Trump's co-defendants in the election interference case to make Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis give them documents and money.

In a different case, the court supported a decision from a lower court made on Monday that was good news for the Merchant Law Firm. The firm argued that Willis' office wasn't following the Open Records Act (ORA). Ashleigh Merchant, a lawyer from the firm, claimed that even though they asked for documents about 20 times in the last year, Willis' office didn't give them what they needed and now will suffer the consequences. 

"She is the elected DA. It's her office. I think that every government agency has a duty to respond to open records requests. I think when you have an elected official that they are the ones who are held accountable by the public. They are the ones who set the policy," Merchant said at the hearing Monday.

Tweet

Fani Willis' mouth in the GA State Senate probe may get her into actual trouble

Fulton County District Attorney Fani [aka Fanny] Willis made headlines on Friday when the state senate Special Committee held its third hearing into allegations of possible conflicts of interest and misuse of taxpayer funds by Willis. Specifically, the Committee is investigating multiple scandals over her relationship with the special prosecutor, Nathan Wade, she originally hired in the Trump election case, and with whom was bumping uglies. [H/T NY Post.]

Both Willis and Wade admitted to the relationship, although they denied it took place before she hired him. The evidence that came out in the judge's probe on the matter was basically conclusive that they were already having an affair (Wade was married at the time) but the witness and friend of Wade who knew it existed, suddenly developed amnesia. 

Georgia Sen. Bill Cowsert (R) asked financial officers about the many “enhancement requests” for extra money Willis has made, including one for roughly a million dollars in 2023 for general trial expenses. Fulton County Chief Financial Officer Sharon Whitmore said the money was a "lump sum not specific with line item details," in explaning what it was used for, according to the Washington Examiner.

Cowsert wanted to understand just how much "oversight" there was in Willis' office saying that it “sounds like it’s very loose as far as employment practices and expenditures for independent contractors.” He also criticized Willis for going after former President Trump in spite of the backlog of actual criminal cases that her office needed to address. He added that they likely would be calling her in the near future.

 

“She’s [Willis] a key part of the investigation and her viewpoints are valued by us. We need to hear what she has to say and her explanation and what she thinks the appropriate rules ought to be going forward so that we don’t have this kind of scandal giving Georgia a black eye in the future,” said Cowsert.

Cowsert said they would subpoena her, if necessary, if she did not comply with their request.

Willis skipped the hearing but responded, claiming, “They can look all they want. The DA’s office has done everything according to the books.”

While attending a community event on Friday, Willis pulled out her tattered Race Card once again.  “Isn’t it interesting when we’ve got a bunch of African American DAs, now we need daddy to tell us what to do.” This crap is getting progressively weaker and people are fed up with being labeled a racist when holding others to normal standards. 

It's very possible the judge on this case, who already ripped her a new one over her racist "church speech," is not going to be happy with that comment. But people with poor excuses and verbal skills tend to pull the Race Card when they have no actual defense. 

If ever anyone might reminds us of a DEI hire, Fani Willis is the poster woman. As Tim Fargo once said, "arrogance is the camouflage of insecurity." Willis is clearly arrogant but has nothing to justify that attitude.

Willis is also facing a probe by the House looking into her office's alleged misuse of federal grant funds after a whistleblower came forward. Willis has claimed the whistleblower is a "disgruntled employee." 

I would be surprised if there is even one 'gruntled' employee in her office.

Tweet

Fani Willis and the new whistleblower

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is in contact with another whistleblower from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ office who intends to expose Willis's misuse of federal funds, he told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo. [H/T Fox News Business.]

Jordan said that a woman informant has come forward and is ready to tell the House Oversight Committee what she knows.

"Now the Justice Department reportedly finding inconsistencies in Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis' use of federal grant money," Bartiromo said. "Willis fired the whistleblower who warned the D.A.'s office was attempting to misuse $488,000."

"This was a federal grant," she continued. "She wanted to use it to pay for computers and travel. I don't know if she was traveling with her boyfriend or not, but the D.O.J. told the Washington Free Beacon the grant is plagued with reporting discrepancies, Mr. Chairman."

"God bless the whistleblower who came forward," Jordan said. "We've talked with the whistleblower. She's given information to the press, to us. Now the Department of Justice is looking into this."

Jordan explained that former Fulton County special prosecutor and Willis' former paramour Nathan Wade had met with the January 6 Committee before resigning his post.

"He was traveling to Washington to meet with the DOJ, the White House, the January 6th Committee, all in this effort to go after President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said. "And now we have this. It looks like misspending federal grant dollars."

Jordan has also subpoenaed documents from Willis regarding the prosecution of Trump for election-related crimes.

"I am in receipt of your letter dated March 14, 2024. I categorically reject the assertion that this office is deficient in responding to the Committee's subpoena dated February 2, 2024," Willis wrote to Jordan last month, having to look up the spelling of 'categorically.'

A spokesperson for the Justice Department informed the Washington Free Beacon of an ongoing investigation into the misuse of federal funds by Willis' office. If it turns out that her office did indeed misuse the money, she will probably not only be off the case, but in the slammer.

The spokesperson noted, "We have noticed some inconsistencies in what Fulton County has reported to [the Federal Subaward Reporting System] and we are working with them to update their reporting accordingly."

The Justice Department did not provide any further details on the nature of Willis’s reporting "inconsistencies" on the $488,000 federal grant, which was earmarked for the creation of a Center for Youth Empowerment and Gang Prevention in Atlanta. The grant ended in September 2023, but the center never opened. 

This sounds a lot like Willis' office was taking their cues from Chirlane McCray, the wife of former Democratic New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who couldn't account for $850,000,000 of taxpayer money her husband gave her for a mental health project.

Something smell fishy.

Tweet

Fani Willis may have new problems she didn't anticipate

Fulton County District Attorney Fani (pronounced "Fanny") Willis somehow got past the disqualification process in the Georgia election case against President Trump and his co-defendants, but she isn't out of the proverbial woods yet. She is looking at multiple complaints from the Georgia state Senate, the state bar, and the House Judiciary Committee.

Moreover, there is a new accusation by the lawyer of one of the co-defendants, and that could spell some serious legal trouble for the woman who puts her dresses on backwards, much like she practices law: have a target [Trump], then find a crime.

In an interview with legal analyst and Townhall columnist Phil Holloway, and the lawyer for Trump's co-defendant Harrison Floyd, attorney Christopher Kachouroff alleges that Willis recorded a phone conversation between herself and one of his colleagues.

"She did reach out to us, one of my colleagues in Maryland, and was rude, abrupt with him on the phone, and he was dealing with the Maryland case and I was dealing with the Georgia case, and she ended up recording him," Kachouroff said.

The trouble for Willis is that she never told the other party that she was recording him.

He explained that Maryland is a "two party state," whereby both parties must consent to the recording. When asked by Holloway if he was saying that Willis illegally recorded the phone call, he said, "Oh, yes" and noted it was a felony in Maryland.

Floyd posted that part of the conversation:

Fani Willis ILLEGALLY recorded a 📞 call with my lawyer.

Its a felony!

She is a DEI thug with a law license.

Will anyone in GA stand up to her❓#fultoncounty #corrupt #Georgia pic.twitter.com/2ZPqckPVzD— Harrison Floyd 🇺🇸 (@hw_floyd) April 4, 2024

Holloway also noted that Floyd followed that up with another tweet calling on Willis to recuse herself by Monday, saying otherwise he would pursue legal remedies.

So far Willis' office has remained unresponsive for comment on this allegation. Perhaps she needs to kick it around in church to see what others think. She isn't very bright, it seems, but it appears that she intimidated Scott McAfee, the judge in the disqualification hearing that got her paramour, Nathan Wade kicked off the case, while she remains on it for now.

McAfee turned down the motion to dismiss the charges on First Amendment grounds without prejudice, meaning the defendants could give it another try.

It's likely that this latest allegation regarding the recorded phone call is going to be a matter of concern for him, if he doesn't allow her to intimidate him again, in my opinion.

Tweet

BREAKING: Trump Appeals Fani Willis Non-Disqualification Decision

An Application for a Certificate of Immediate Review was filed by the Trump team and his co-defendants to appeal Judge Scott McAfee's decision to keep Fulton County DA Fani Willis and her office on the RICO case against the former President and the co-defendants.

Under Georgia law, you typically do not appeal for whatever reasons at pre-trial. You usually wait until the trial concludes to appeal the outcome. That means you must wait until the end of the case if you lose.

However, there are times when things are so important that you need to get them out of the way early in the case. This is, according to the Trump team, one such time.

This appeal tells Judge McAfee that his March 15 order is extremely important to the case regarding due process of law.

The document essentially says that since an outsider can reasonably think the District Attorney is not exercising her independent, professional judgment, totally free of compromising influences, that she should be taken off the case along with her office.

Naturally, this works in Trump's favor and anyone of fair mind would agree that Willis is not exercising independent, professional judgment and is compromised.

Now it's hurry up and wait to see what happens next.

Tweet

Fani fan Wade resigns in disgrace and takes one for the team

Special prosecutor and former paramour of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, Nathan Wade is resigning in disgrace after Judge Scott McAfee's decision to disqualify either him or Willis in the case against former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendant's.

Rather than making his former lover have to make the obvious choice of dumping him, Wade chose to resign from the case and is actually the sacrificial goat.

Wade sent Willis a resignation letter telling her that he is throwing in the towel, as if she didn't know this before the letter arrived.

"I am offering my resignation in the interest of democracy, in dedication to the American people, and to move this case forward as quickly as possible," Wade wrote.

"Seeking justice for the people of Georgia and the United States, and being part of the effort to ensure that the rule of law and democracy are preserved, has been the honor of a lifetime," Wade's resignation letter written late Friday afternoon concludes.

It is unknown as to whether or not the letter was actually written by AI, but it did sound official. 

"I am sure that the case, and the team, will be in good hands moving forward and justice will be served," Willis told Wade. "You, the team on this case, and the entire office have my prayers for your safety and your success in pursuit of justice."

Willis has since accepted Wade's resignation and praised him for his "courage to accept the role." 

She also complimented him for "the professionalism and dignity you have shown in over the last 865 days."

"Please accept my sincere gratitude on behalf of the citizens of Fulton County, Georgia, for your patriotism, courage, and dedication to justice. I wish you the best in your future endeavors," Willis said, adding, "Call me."

Though she responded to Wade stepping down, Willis has yet to issue an official response to the judge's ruling. It's predicted that she will appear in church where she will call upon Jesus to forgive Judge McAfee. 

In Friday's ruling, Judge McAfee said the prosecution "cannot proceed" until the Willis-Wade ultimatum is resolved. Well, it looks like he resolved it in a cowardly way as no charges for perjury were filed against either Wade or Willis. Perhaps they are to come in the near future.

Tweet

BREAKING: Justice is broken as judge rules as predicted

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee ruled that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is not going to be held accountable for what appears to be perjury, and will get to keep her law license and arrogant attitude. All she has to do is either step aside from the case against President Trump, or fire her former paramour, Nathan Wade.

McAfee, as predicted, issued the ruling as his re-election to the bench looms large. He heard evidence presented by attorneys for the co-defendants in the 2020 election interference case and did not allow it to interfere with his personal ambition, much like President Biden is doing in the case of Israel v. Hamas.

Four co-defendants accused Willis of having an "improper" affair with Nathan Wade, the lover she hired to help prosecute the case and with whom she enjoyed lavish vacations paid for by Wade.

The co-defendants alleged that Willis benefited financially by hiring Wade because they were in a pre-existing relationship when he was hired in 2021 and would vacation together. She claimed to have repaid the tens of thousands of dollars he spent on her in cash she keeps lying around in her apartment because she is black and that's how she rolls. Evidently, that was good enough proof for McAfee.

Wade and Willis both denied they were kicking boots prior to his hiring and that the couple would split the costs of their shared travels. 

On Wednesday McAfee issued a ruling that quashed six counts in the Georgia election interference case and Trump's 18 co-defendants. The judge said the state failed to allege sufficient detail for "solicitation of violation of oath by public officer."

There is no accountability anymore and McAfee is a self-serving coward--it's all theater.

Tweet

BREAKING: Fani Willis investigation will hold Wednesday hearing with key witness testimony

Townhall independently confirms that on Wednesday [tomorrow] Georgia State's special committee will hold a hearing with a key witness to testify on the RICO case against former President Trump and his co-defendants. 

Although Professor Alan Dershowitz isn't certain that the hearing will go forward, it appears Townhall may have information Dershowitz does not have.

If the hearing takes place, Fani Willis' fanny will be on the line. But Townhall sounds confident that it will take place and will be  publicly livestreamed, per Townhall columnist Phil Holloway, who broke the news Monday.

Professor Dershowitz does not believe Willis' claim that the affair began after she appointed her paramour, Nathan Wade, but he is speculating . . . but most thoughtful people who have followed the case agree.

One of the Trump co-defendants has since asked McAfee to consider additional witness testimony before he decides Willis's fate. The witness, a senior prosecutor from a neighboring county, felt the need to correct the record after watching Bradley's testimony.

According to the eleventh-hour request filed Monday, Cobb County Deputy DA Cindi Lee Yeager had "numerous" conversations with Terrence Bradley, Wade's divorce attorney [on paper] discussing the Willis-Wade affair. "Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley's testimony before the Court and became concerned [...] that what Mr. Bradley testified to [...] was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person," the filing says.

Bradley allegedly told Yeager information that corroborates what former Willis staffer Robin Bryant-Yeartie testified during the disqualification proceedings, specifically that Willis and Wade began dating around the time they met in 2019. The filing also alludes to Yeartie's condominium, where Willis was subletting, being used as a sex hub, as Wade's cell phone data shows. 

In September 2021, while Bradley was visiting Yeager's office, he received a phone call from a frantic Willis, Yeager says, after a damaging article was published pinpointing how much money Wade has been paid by the county for his work on the Trump case.

Yeager allegedly heard Willis tell Bradley: "They are coming after us. You don't need to talk to them about anything about us."

Tweet

Fani Willis warned paramour's divorce lawyer to keep his mouth shut: "They're coming for us"

The Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fani [the 'a is pronounced like an 'o'] may be in up to her neck in you know what. A new witness might testify that Willis warned Terrence Bradley, the friend and divorce lawyer of Nathan Wade and Willis' paramour, to keep his mouth shut at her hearing, according to a new court filing.

“They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us,” Willis is alleged to have warned Bradley in a September 2023 phone call.

The call was overheard by Cobb County, Georgia, prosecutor Cindi Lee Yeager, according to court papers filed Monday by Trump co-defendant David Schafer. If Yeager is allowed to testify at this point in the hearing, Fani Willis and Nathan Wade could make hula skirts out of their butts, because that part of their anatomy will be, as they say, grass. [Only old people and ex-military will get that reference.]

Willis is currently fighting to remain in her position in overseeing the election interference case which charged Donald Trump and 18 others in a RiCO filing.

She stands accused of carrying on a relationship with Wade, prior to her appointing him special prosecutor, but hiding it from the court, presenting a conflict of interest and possible perjury for lying in court.

Willis and Wade have said under oath they were only romantic between 2022 and 2023, long after the case started. But there is very strong evidence that this is a lie as there are texts, phone records showing Wade in close proximity to Willis' condo at night then leaving in the wee hours of the morning. It's possible they were discussing law, but just not with their clothing on.

At a hearing over whether to disqualify Willis last week Bradley said on the stand that he had no “knowledge” of when the two prosecutors started dating, but even he had evidence against him showing that he knew.

But the filing says Yeager would swear under oath that the claim was at odds with what Bradley told Yeager in person — that the romance began in 2019, during Willis’s DA campaign.

The call was overheard by Cobb County, Georgia, prosecutor Cindi Lee Yeager.

Bradley also texted a lawyer for another Trump co-defendant the pair were “absolutely” dating before Willis hired Wade to manage the Trump prosecution in November 2021 — and then muttered, “Oh, dang” when the evidence was shown to him on the stand.

Yeager is willing to testify Bradley told her Wade “had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020,” Monday’s filing says.

So heads should roll but not Trump's nor those of his co-defendants.

After watching Bradley’s testimony, Yeager “became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person,” Monday’s filing says.

Judge Scott McAfee has said he hopes to rule on whether Willis can stay on the case in the next two weeks, but we don't know if he'll re-open the can-of-worms hearing for additional evidence.

If he rules to keep Willis and/or Wade on the Trump case, the law has not been served.

Tweet

BREAKING: Judge decides if Nathan Wade's former lawyer will take the stand again

Her dress is on backwards

BREAKING: Judge Scott McAfee has determined that Terrance Bradley, the former lawyer and friend of Nathan Wade will take the stand again and testify on information in the case that is not protected under attorney-client privilege. This will likely be a huge deciding factor in how McAfee will rule.

The Fulton County, GA District Attorney, Fani Willis insists vehemently that her "personal relationship" with her former paramour Nathan Wade, did not take place before she hired him on the Trump RICO election interference case. But telephone records strongly suggests otherwise. The outcome of Judge Scott McAfee's decision will determine whether Wade will try the case as charged and possibly have either Willis, Wade, or both disbarred and the case thrown out altogether. In other words, what Willis claims about Trump et al, is what she is on trial for. She says she is not on trial, and technically she's right, but let's face it--she's on trial for her career and possibly later charged with perjury.

Right now the issue is the cellular data from AT&T by Trump's attorneys. Trump is just one of the 19 defendants charged by Willis in her sprawling racketeering case, and her lover, Wade, has no experience with these types of cases yet is being paid over $650,000 for his time--more than her own attorneys under her.

The phone logs show almost 12,000 texts and 2,000 phone calls between Wade and Willis, prior to Wade being hired by her. That is definitely a bad look.

The phone data also allegedly shows no less than 35 wee hours visits by Wade to Willis' apartment in Atlanta's Hapeville neighborhood.

Willis, who seems to think people are gullible, says the analysis  “was not filed in good faith but instead is nothing more than another attempt to garner salacious headlines in the media.” So facts don't matter, eh?

Incredibly, she speculates whether former President Trump “illegally obtained cell site location information, which is generally only obtainable after a finding of probable cause and issuance of a search warrant.” 

Trump’s legal team says a private detective in their employ gained the phone records through a lawful subpoena. [Can we get an LOL?]

The content of the texts remains private, but if the correspondence proves an affair that antedates Wade’s appointment, that would contradict the claim both prosecutors have made — under oath — that their intimacy began only after Wade was named special prosecutor and could not have been the motivation for his hiring. Trump and other defendants said that the outlandish payments Wade has received — and spent on joint trips — amount to an incurable conflict of interest.

The decision as to whether the phone records will be entered into evidence is Judge Scott McAfee’s to make, and he will likely do so ahead of a March 1 hearing he has called for further argument on the disqualification question. Willis, in a Friday filing, argued that they “do not prove anything relevant” and “do not prove, in any way, the content of the communications between Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis.”

In legal terms, this is what is known as "grasping for straws."

Willis labels Trump’s submission, which is founded on an analysis by a private investigator, Charles Mittelstadt, as “unqualified opinion evidence.” She also claims that Mr. Mittlestadt’s qualifications have not been fully vetted but it turns out that he's fully qualified. [See legal term definition above.]

Trump’s attorneys responded that the analyst’s credentials are not at issue — instead, the ballast of the claim that Willis and Wade are lying are “data that was produced by AT&T in response to the lawfully issued subpoena.”

Sensing the danger to her stewardship of the case shown by the phone logs, Willis writes that the “records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located.”

So perhaps he was getting drunk, getting laid, or having a bite to eat at 3 a.m.

Willis adds that the proffered pieces of evidence “do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis were ever in the same place during any of the times listed.” Her filing also notes that “on multiple relevant dates and times” Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade were “VISITING THE THREE CRIME SCENES WHERE A MASS MURDER MOTIVATED BY RACE AND GENDER BIAS HAD TAKEN PLACE.”

And if you believe that, you might be a woke liberal.

On Monday, Judge McAfee met in camera, with a former law partner of Wade, Terrence Bradley. 

Bradley also handled Wade’s divorce from his wife of 26 years, Joycelyn, who just wasn't doing it for Wade anymore. 

The defendants maintain that Bradley possesses information showing that Wade’s extramarital affair with Willis predated his appointment to the case. Bradley admitted on the stand that he left Wade’s employ due to accusations of sexual harassment.

There might just be a "Perry Mason Moment." Stay tuned.

Tweet

You won't believe the number of texts Fani Willis and Nathan Wade sent to each other, casting doubt on sworn testimony

Ah . . . love. There are songs about love; poems about love; letters about love; and even texts about love. Sometimes there are thousands of texts.

Former President Donald Trump's attorney filed phone records in a Georgia court that suggests the Fulton County District Attorney [and apparent DEI hire] Fani Willis, and her guy hired to investigate Trump, were in constant contact during 2021 while both testified their affair began in 2022. 

[By the way, I refer to Willis as a DEI hire because after hearing her testify on the stand, she sounds like a bitter, defensive pro se defendant rather than an accomplished DA. She actually seemed to reveal that she spend some of the campaign funds on herself, which is indictable.]

The Willis and Wade partnership texted 12,000 times and spoke by phone nearly 2,000 times in the first 11 months of 2021, according to the filing Friday. That's more than most happily married couples some might say.

Charles Mittelstadt, a private investigator hired by the defense, said in an affidavit that he subpoenaed Wade’s cell phone records from AT&T Inc. and obtained them February 15, the same day Willis and Wade testified under oath that they didn't knock boots until after Willis hired Wade in November 2021.

Several defendants, including Trump, are seeking to have the case dismissed or have Willis removed as prosecutors over what they claim is a conflict of interest and alleged financial benefits from their romance. 

Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee hasn’t said when he’ll decide on the request to dismiss the indictment or disqualify Willis, Wade and the district attorney’s office from the case. He can do all three and even have Willis indicted for campaign fraud, but that would be too much to hope for.

In the filing, Mittelstadt claims his geolocation analysis of the AT&T data concluded Wade’s phone was near Willis’ address at least 35 times in the first 11 months of 2021, and we know it didn't get there by itself. And on at least two occasions, Wade was in the area of Willis' house in the wee hours of the morning.

The investigator is “available to testify at the court’s convenience,” Trump attorney Steve Sadow said in the filing. The filing said it included a report of all the calls and texts, a “heat map” reflecting the prevalence of calls, and a PowerPoint presentation of “geolocation highlights.”

Willis gave two hours of angry, amateurish, combative testimony last week. She said Michael Roman's attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, was lying when she claimed Willis benefitted financially from giving Wade the case. Merchant and her husband run their own law firm in Atlanta, and she is president of the Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

“You’re confused,” Willis said. “You think I’m on trial. These people are on trial for trying to steal an election.”

Wrong, Fani. You are on trial as to whether you are qualified to handle the case, and wether you should keep you license to practice law and maybe even go to prison for perjury and unethical behavior [with the funds you benefitted from by paying your lover].

At the hearing last week, a former law partner of Wade, Terrence Bradley, claimed that attorney-client privilege prevented him from testifying whether the romantic relationship started before or after November 2021.

Defense lawyers claim Bradley, who represented Wade in his ongoing divorce, has knowledge not covered by the privilege that the relationship began before that date. McAfee, who must decide who’s telling the truth, said he would question Bradley privately in his chambers and decide how to proceed. 

In a filing on Thursday, Wade’s attorney Andrew Evans urged the judge to cancel that private interview, which defense lawyers say is scheduled for Monday.

“The court should not conduct the examination under any circumstance,” Evans wrote. “Georgia law clearly prohibits compelled disclosure of the attorney-client privileged communications at issue, even in camera.”

So now we shall see where this non-trial trial goes.

Tweet

Judge McAfee to rule in Fani Willis--Trump Georgia case

Final arguments are being prepared in the Trump election interference case as to whether Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis should be disqualified due to her intimate relationship with the special prosecutor Nathan Wade. 

Willis hired Wade rather than using the lawyers in her own office, and it is alleged that Wade was romantically schtupping her since 2019. She is paying Wade over $650,000 which is more than any of her lawyers are paid, and the kicker is that Wade has relatively no experience in RICO cases as this one happens to be. 

It is also alleged that Willis personally benefitted from what she paid to Wade having taken elaborate and frequent vacation cruises with him, which may account for her rather full figure because it's always "all you can eat" on cruises. She claimed to have paid Wade back for her part of the expenses, but doesn't have a shred of evidence to prove that, claiming she always paid cash because she's black and you just don't understand.

After an excruciating drama-filled two-day hearing on the motion to disqualify Willis, we now await for the next steps.

There will now be an on-camera hearing with Judge Scott McAfee and the defense's "star witness" Terrence Bradley, the former divorce lawyer for Nathan Wade. This hearing is set for Monday February 26, according to Fox News.

On Friday, when Bradley testified, every question he received was immediately followed by an objection by the state and even his own lawyer.

The arguments centered on whether Bradley’s testimony would violate attorney-client privilege, since he was Wade’s divorce lawyer for a time. It's probable that not all the questions would violate that issue because Bradley was also Wade's friend and not everything is privileged outside of court when it doesn't directly involve Wade's divorce case.

Despite that, what is said on-camera, behind closed doors, could open things up in Bradley's testimony. Judge McAfee will determine how much of Bradley's testimony would violate attorney-client privilege and how much weight should be given the testimony that is admissible.

The next step expected would be a final hearing. The state and defense would sum up their evidence and give final arguments. That should be scheduled for next week if the source is correct. The exact date is to be determined.

Even if there is no conflict of interest in this case, which I suspect there is, just the appearance of such a conflict is enough to get Willis thrown off the case on her substantial duff. But it will be up to McAfee to decide what to do with what he hears.

It it was up to me, I'd throw her off the case, indict her for misuse of campaign funds [which she unintentionally revealed via her motor-mouth] and throw out the case overall. It's obviously a witch hunt, but it's the witch who's doing the hunting in this case.

Tweet

GA whistleblowers to testify against Fulton County DA Fani Willis

The misconduct investigation began Friday against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, the woke DA who brought the election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

State Sen. Bill Cowsert (R) chaired a meeting of the Georgia Senate Special Committee on Investigations. He revealed incredible information that multiple whistleblowers from Willis' office have come forward to testify against their boss. 

The senator alleged that Willis misused the state and federal funds, which comes after she admitted to having a sexual relationship with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she hired and who had no experience in the type of case he was hired for--RICO cases.

"This is not a political witch hunt; this is a quest for the truth," Cowsert said at Friday's meeting, as reported by FOX 5 Atlanta.

Trump and attorneys also agree that Willis needs to be disqualified over the allegations, and believes that all charges against them be dismissed.

Last month, Michael Roman, a co-defendant in the case, filed court documents alleging that Willis had been having an "improper" affair with Wade, whom she hired to help prosecute Trump and others. Roman and his lawyers argue that the relationship with the married Wade created a conflict of interest. Moreover, Willis benefitted financially from the relationship with expensive vacations she and Wade too using the legal funds her office paid his firm. 

Golly gee, it sort of sounds reminiscent of the Biden family situation.

Willis has called the allegations "salacious" and said they have no "merit," though she admitted in a court filing that she and Wade have been "professional associates and friends since 2019." 

House Republicans have now subpoenaed Willis to testify on separate allegations that she misused federal funds and fired a whistleblower in her office. Responding, her office said, "These false allegations are included in baseless litigation filed by a holdover employee from the previous administration who was terminated for cause. The courts that have ruled found no merit in these claims. We expect the same result in any pending litigation."

Georgia Republicans are leading their own investigation over the objections of Democrats who say Willis' critics are politically motivated. [Democrats would defend the late Osama bin Laden if he had been a Democrat.]

"I think a political witch hunt or show trial would damage Georgians' faith in both our political and legal system," Democratic state Sen. Gloria Butler said, according to FOX 5 Atlanta.

But Republicans have moved the case forward. 

"You lose the confidence of the public and the fairness of the criminal justice system if they think prosecutors are engaged in prosecution so their lovers can get rich," Cowsert said, and indicated that Willis may be called on to testify to the committee. "It's not a given. I will certainly give her the opportunity, and if I were her, I would want to be heard," he said.

Tweet

FL lawmaker introduces legislation to remove Fani Willis for her political persecution against Trump

Republican Rep. Cory Mills (FL) introduced legislation called the "Against Federal Funds for Allowing Inappropriate Relationships Act," [or the AFFAIR Act] designed to stop federal funding to the office of "any state or local chief prosecutor if any individual in such office has been convicted for engaging in corruption or any other unlawful activity.”

The bill sends a clear and direct message to Fani Willis, the Fulton County DA that her political games against former President Trump will not be tolerated.

Mills blasted Willis for her relationship with the special prosecutor Nathan Wade who she appointed to prosecute the Georgia election case against Trump, accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election. It happens to be a RICO case which Wade has no experience trying. Willis is also  facing accusations that she personally benefitted financially from her relationship with Wade.

In a statement, Mills called on Willis to recuse herself from the investigation against the former President.

"Not only was Fani Willis’ relationship with Nathan Wade extremely inappropriate and created concerns around a conflict of interest, but it also potentially shows violations of bias against political opposition and lawfare for election interference,” Mills told the Washington Examiner in a statement. “Under no circumstance should federal funds be sent to a state or local office if there is unlawful and unethical activity taking place. Our nation was founded on the steadfast tenets that liberty and justice — including the fair and equal application of the law — are crucial to ensuring the preservation of our constitutional republic," Mills continued. "I’m proud to introduce the AFFAIR Act to ensure American taxpayer dollars will not be misappropriated or weaponized due to unlawful and unethical activities."

Trump’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case against the former president after learning of Willis’ affair with the adulterer Wade.

In a letter to the State Bar of Georgia, Mills argued that any alleged relationship between Willis and Wade could “give rise to possible violations of bias, conflict of interest, and potential kickback.”

On the contrary, Willis seeks to dismiss subpoenas that focus on her alleged misappropriation of county and federal funds.

A nine-page motion filed by Willis says, “each of these subpoenas appears transparently to be an attempt to conduct discovery in a (rather belated) effort to support reckless accusations made in prior court filings,” adding that the subpoenas should be “quashed.”

Tweet