Pipe bomb suspect in court as his family cries wet tears

The January 6 pipe-bomber saga just took the most predictable turn imaginable, and the regime media is already memory-holing it faster than Hunter Biden's laptop.

After FIVE YEARS of the FBI pretending this guy was the Zodiac Killer crossed with Carmen Sandiego, they finally drag in one Brian Cole Jr., 30-year-old Woodbridge, Virginia man who, believe it or not, allegedly confessed in a four-hour interview the very day he was arrested. 

And how does the family greet him in federal court? Not with shame, not with silence, but with the waterworks and the full-throated: "We love you, Brian! We're always here for you!"

Yeah, nothing says "wrongly accused patriot" quite like your female relatives turning the courtroom into a Hallmark movie the second the pipe-bomb suspect shuffles in wearing Crocs and a mustache that screams "I peaked in 10th grade."

The same FBI that could find a noose-shaped garage pull-down rope in Bubba Wallace’s stall in fifteen minutes somehow needed half a decade, a $500k reward (renewed by Trump, by the way), and God-only-knows how many man-hours to catch the guy who was, checks notes, buying bomb parts at eight different Home Depots and strolling around Capitol Hill the night before J6 like he was on a Pokémon Go route.

Kash Patel already went there: FBI Director Kash Patel blasted the FBI under the Biden administration for allegedly sitting on evidence that could have led to Cole's arrest sooner.

Translation: The same people who swore the pipe bombs were the work of some MAGA mastermind couldn't find their own backside with a flashlight and a search warrant when it meant actually solving the case before Trump got back in office.

Brian Cole, Jr., the man who Jake Tapper called 'a white man'

And then there's Grandma Loretta, still swinging for the fences: "He did not do it. He did not," she insisted, in spite of his confession. "He’s a good kid. He's a 30-year-old man, and he has the mind of a 16-year-old. They are railroading him. I'm with him every day, and I've never seen any evidence of this. I'm really floored. I don't know how to take it."

Lady, the evidence is apparently a four-hour confession, surveillance footage, cell-phone pings, and receipts from half of northern Virginia. But sure, “railroading.”

The same judge handling this, Moxila Upadhyaya, is the one who oversaw a parade of J6 trespassers before Trump pardoned them. Funny how that works.

Bottom line: The FBI sat on this for years while Nancy Pelosi's January 6 committee milked the 'unsolved pipe bombs" mystery for every drop of Trump-is-Hitler propaganda they could squeeze out. 

The second Trump wins and Kash Patel takes over? Poof, suspect in custody within weeks.

Almost like someone didn't want this solved until the political timing was… convenient. 

Ya think?

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you.

Tweet

BBC is sorry for 'misleading' editing of J6 Trump speech: apologizes vociferously

Oh, the humanity. Or should I say, the BBC-ity? 

The once-mighty British Broadcasting Corporation, that bastion of impartiality (stop laughing), has slunk into a full-throated apology to President Donald Trump after one of their dusty old documentaries got caught with its pants down in a blatant case of video voodoo. You know, the kind where they stitch together clips like a mad tailor on a bender to make the Orange Man look like he's auditioning for a sequel to The Purge.

It all stems from a 2024 Panorama special titled "Trump: A Second Chance?"  And let's face it, nothing says "second chance" like dredging up January 6th a week before the election to remind everyone why you hate the guy. Trump's legal eagles spotted the hack job and fired off a salvo, calling the clip "defamatory and false." It took Trump's actual words, calm as a sloth on tranquilizers, to then splice them together with "fight like hell" rhetoric to paint him as the pied piper of pitchforks. 

Classic media malfeasance, served with a side of crumpets.

In the reality of unedited glory, PresidentTrump said: "We’re going to walk down,  and I'll be there with you. … We're going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave Senators and Congressmen and women," before adding: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

But in the BBC's funhouse mirror version it becomes: "We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell you're not gonna have a country anymore." They didn't just edit; they Frankensteined three clips, yanking one from nearly an hour later like it was all one seamless call to arms. Subtle as a sledgehammer.

Enter Michael Prescott, the ex-independent watchdog for the BBC's Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee (EGSC), because nothing screams "trust us" like acronyms that sound like rejected Bond villains. He dropped a 19-page takedown, concluding that "in the worst-case scenario, it does appear to be an attempt to influence the election," though he charitably noted it's unlikely many Yanks tuned in before voting day. (Pro tip to Beeb: If you're meddling in American politics, at least make it binge-worthy.)

Trump, never one to suffer fools or fuzzy edits gladly, rattled the saber with a $1 billion lawsuit threat unless they yanked the doc and groveled. His attorney, Alejandro Brito, fired off the missive: a demand for a "full and fair retraction of the documentary and any other false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading, and inflammatory statements about President Trump," plus an apology, compensation, and a hard deadline of 5:00 p.m. EST on Friday, November 14th.

CNN, in a rare moment of not being the story, reported on it Monday. "Overwhelming financial and reputational harm," the lawyers warned, because nothing says "libel" like turning a taxpayer-funded outfit into Trump's personal piñata.

The fallout? Two BBC bigwigs, Director-General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness, bailed on Sunday, presumably to polish their résumés for openings at MSNBC. 

The BBC's mea culpa dropped Thursday: "The BBC acknowledged that their edit unintentionally created the impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

Not an accident.

And get this: BBC chair Samir Shah penned a personal "sorry-not-sorry" to the White House on Sunday, vowing no rebroadcasts. A spokesperson added the fine print: "While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim."

Balderdash, BBC. It was obviously intentional--you don't edit by cutting out the middle and make it sounds like Trump was calling for a civil war.

What the BBC was saying was: "We goofed, but sue us and we'll see you in court, cheerio!" Even the Brits are in a tizzy. Labor MP Lisa Nandy defended the Beeb in Parliament, cooing: "It is by far the most widely used and trusted source of news in the United Kingdom. At a time when the lines are being dangerously blurred between fact and opinion, news and polemic, the BBC stands apart." (Said the woman from the party that thinks "trust" is a four-letter word.)

Meanwhile, furious callers jammed a BBC radio show, one bellowing: "If we have to pay a penny to Trump, then I'm sorry, I'm not going to pay my TV license. The world just seems to be frightened of him. I think the BBC needs to stand up to him."

Frightened? Sweet-cheeks, the BBC just learned what happens when you poke the Trump bear with a rusty editing bayonet. In the end, this is peak establishment panic: a global media giant reduced to whimpering apologies because they couldn't resist one last swing at the man who refuses to stay down. 

Trump needs to see this one out to the end and sue.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Woah Nelly! FBI to investigate Liz Cheney

The House Oversight Subcommittee, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), has issued a 127-page Interim Report that outlines various questionable activities connected to the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and the investigation that followed by the Democratic Select Committee, which was supposedly set up to uncover the truth about the events of that day but turned out to be a witch hunt.

Of special note are the report's findings regarding the actions of former Rep. Liz Cheney (RINO-WY). She was a member of the Committee and allegedly leveraged her role to criticize President-elect Donald Trump. According to the report, she exerted excessive control over the Committee's activities to focus on the president-elect, pushing the idea that he was responsible for inciting the violence on January 6, which was proved to be a lie as anyone who listened to what Trump said that day to his followers knows.

The report wraps up by suggesting that the FBI should investigate Cheney's conduct, which men of good faith all feel she should go to federal prison for a long time.

The Oversight Subcommittee points to Cheney's public comments as proof that her primary concern during her time on the Select Committee was Trump, rather than addressing the broader security lapses that took place on January 6.

"Representative Cheney mentions President Trump eighteen separate times in her four-page Forward to the Select Committee’s Final Report—including her statements that 'no man' who behaved as President Trump 'can ever serve in any position of authority in our nation again,'" the report pointed out.

The authors noted that Cheney didn't "mention any of the tangible failures of that day" and "spoke of law enforcement only twice, and never mentioned the National Guard or the multi-agency intelligence failures."

One staff member told investigators that when the J6 Committee "became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged."

"Representative Cheney’s influence on the Select Committee’s work and the conclusions it drew cannot be overstated. Before the Select Committee published its final report, fifteen current and former staffers approached the Washington Post to express deep frustration with Representative Cheney’s heavy-handed oversight of the Select Committee’s work. The article states that 'committee staff members were floored' when told that the final report 'would focus almost entirely on Trump.'"

The Subcommittee also addressed Cheney’s supposed attempt to influence former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony before the Select Committee. The report claims that Cheney "communicated directly with Cassidy Hutchinson without her attorney’s knowledge, despite Cheney knowing it was unethical."

The report notes that Hutchinson acknowledged receiving "contact information for multiple attorneys at various firms" from the former lawmaker.

"It is unusual—and potentially unethical—for a Member of Congress conducting an investigation to contact a witness if the Member knows that the individual is represented by legal counsel. Representative Cheney is an attorney, and an attorney who circumvents an individual’s legal representation would violate well-established attorney ethics standards."

The Subcommittee also found evidence of frequent communications between Hutchinson and Cheney without her lawyer’s knowledge. It alleged that Cheney helped Hutchinson find new legal representation and compromised her testimony. However, the former lawmaker, in her book, made it appear as if she "passively waited for Hutchinson to fire her attorney and find new counsel on her own," according to the report.

Cheney allegedly played an instrumental role in shaping Hutchinson’s testimony. "Her first two interviews, though consistent with one another, were significantly different than the narrative she told in her four subsequent interviews and live testimony," the report stated, also stating that the former lawmaker’s "decision to rush Hutchinson’s testimony caused 'unforced errors' and did not afford staff the 'opportunity to thoroughly vet the line of questioning.'"

"Hutchinson testified to a series of specific, outrageous claims about President Trump on January 6, 2021. Nearly all her allegations involve incidents to which she was not an eyewitness, and the parties she credited for relaying those alleged events to her categorically denied her claims."

In one instance, Hutchinson made the outlandish claim that Trump had tried to lunge past Secret Service agents and grab the steering wheel as he was being transported from the Capitol building in a limousine.

The Oversight subcommittee suggested that "numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney". It recommended that "these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation" because the former lawmaker "tampered with at least one witness."

The report argues that the FBI should investigate Cheney for violating laws against "procuring another person to commit perjury."

Of course, it is doubtful that Cheney will face any kind of accountability for her alleged actions. But the report clearly demonstrates what many already knew: Cheney saw the Select Committee as an opportunity to boost her popularity by positioning herself as the ultimate anti-Trump figure.

Cheney made the mistake of basing her entire political platform on going after the president-elect, an issue that contributed to her ignominious defeat in the 2022 midterm primaries.

Tweet

Fani Willis ordered to turn over communication with Special Counsel Jack Smith, J6 Committee

Fani [aka Fanny] Willis is to the American justice system as Al Sharpton is to Reverends.

A Georgia Superior Court on Tuesday found Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in default for not providing records requested by Judicial Watch related to her communications with Special Counsel jack "Get Trump" Smith's office or those regarding the J6 rally.

Judicial Watch (JW) sued Willis under the Open Records Act (ORA) and the court granted the default judgment motion JW filed.

The motion said the lawsuit against Willis was filed in March 2024, but by May, when Judicial Watch asked the court for a default judgment, Willis still hadn't responded. She was supposed to file an answer within 30 days of being served, which was on March 11. Although the proof of service was filed just two days after that, it didn't show up in the court's online records. Because of this, the court thought Willis hadn't been served yet, so in April, they ordered Judicial Watch to serve her again. Judicial Watch then resubmitted the proof that Willis was indeed served on March 11 (Post Millennial).

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must forfeit any and all communications with Special Counsel Jack Smith and House Democrats' Jan. 6 Committee, a state judge ruled on Tuesday.

In his six-page order, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney ruled that Willis is "in default" for failing to file court documents responding to a legal challenge brought by Judicial Watch.

The conservative watchdog group filed a lawsuit against Willis in March after the Democrat district attorney denied having any of the records the group sought in an August 2023 open records request. That request aimed to obtain communications between her office and the special counsel and/or the Jan. 6 Committee.

“We’ve been doing this work for 30 years, and this is the first time in our experience a government official has been found in default for not showing up in court to answer an open records lawsuit,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “Judicial Watch looks forward to getting any documents from the Fani Willis operation about collusion with the Biden administration and Nancy Pelosi’s Congress on her unprecedented and compromised ‘get-Trump’ prosecution.”

Now let's hurry up and wait to see what will transpire. Many people think Willis needs to go. 

What do you think? 

Ex-FBI Agent Convicted of Stealing Money, including a J6er

Nicholas A. Williams, a former FBI agent, repeatedly stole money during searches, including a search on a January 6 protestor.

Williams, a former FBI agent, stole over $10,000 while conducting searches. He's now looking at up to 10 years in federal prison and could be fined as much as $250,000. He was found guilty in September and will learn his sentence next month. This case sheds light on the corruption issues within the FBI, pointing to the urgent need for changes in the agency. It also brings attention to how January 6th protesters have been treated unfairly.

Federal court documents, as reported by Houston Public Media, reveal that Williams, serving in the criminal violent gang and counterterrorism squads, "embezzled and wrongfully converted" $1,200 during a search warrant execution in December 2020 in Houston. Then, in March 2022, he stole over $4,000 while carrying out another search at a residence.

One of the victims was the aforementioned peaceful J6 protester who was just inside the Capitol, The People's House, without causing any disturbance:

The third theft happened on Jan. 12, 2023, when Williams took over $1,500 and several silver bars from someone under investigation for being part of the Jan. 6 protest at the U.S. Capitol. In February, Alexander Fan admitted to a federal misdemeanor charge for being inside the U.S. Capitol during the protest and was sentenced to 12 months in prison.

Williams pulled off two more thefts in July and September 2023. The FBI reported that he also took several phones from the department in 2022 and wrongly used a government credit card.

The total value of the cash and items he stole was over $10,000. He used this money to purchase firearms and their accessories.

According to Houston Public Media, Williams has entered a plea agreement. As part of this deal, he must fully cooperate with any future federal investigations.

And now, with Kash Patel set to head the FBI, maybe he can get the agency squared away.

Tweet

Lyin' Joe and the pardoning of Hunter's crimes

"They can't touch you now, son."

Alleged President Joe Biden said that nobody is above the law but he left out the word 'almost'. As most people know by now, Joe has pardoned his son, Hunter, 54, of every crime he has committed for an entire decade of committing crimes.

Here are the crimes Hunter has been officially charged with: 

1. Tax Evasion. He had been indicted on nine counts, including not one, not two but three felonies for tax evasion including filing a false or fraudulent tax return for tax years 2016 through 2019. Also he failed to file and pay taxes and was accused of not paying $1,400,000 in self-assessed federal taxes and using funds for his 'high' lifestyle. 

2. Illegal firearm possession. He was convicted on three felony charges regarding the purchase of a gun in 2018, and this included making a false statement on the question as to whether he used drugs. [And you may recall that Hunter disposed of the weapon in a dumpster located near a school, which is another crime.]

Alleged Crimes that did not result in formal charges:

1. Money Laundering, tax fraud, and additional financial misconduct. His laptop, which turned out not to be Russian collusion, had information on it that show possible violations like money laundering and tax fraud. 

2. Violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). It had been alleged that Biden needed to register as a foreign agent based on his business dealings in China, Russia, Ukraine and Romania. Being above the law and possibly knowing Daddy would pardon  him, he did not register. 

3. Drug offenses. Reports, claims and photos suggest Hunter's involvement with drug [and prostitutes] but this has not been formally charged because he is the son of the U.S. President.

4. Sex related crime. Hunter's laptop depicted him as a whoring drug-addled son-of-a-president, but no charges have been filed, and if there had been, his daddy would pardon him anyway.

Although Biden previously said he would not pardon Hunter, he now claims that his son was "singled out," [unlike the J6 protesters who were not]. 

The pardon came before Hunter was expected to be sentenced on the gun and tax evasion crimes that he was convicted of in December. 

No prison time for the friends and families of the elite.

“No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong,” President Biden said.

In other words, if you or I evaded paying our taxes to the tune of millions, bought a gun illegally and lied on the federal form for the purchase, then disposed of it in a dumpster near a school, and laundered money from Russia, Ukraine, China and Romania as it was earmarked for political influence, we would be forgiven by the President, even if we were not related to him or were his pal. 

If you believe that nonsense, then you might also believe that snakes have hips.

Tweet

House Committee has the goods to prove Pentagon ignored Trump's J6 Nat'l Guard request

If it wasn't for Nancy Pelosi, the J6 [Leftist] Committee and sundry Democrats, there would be no allegations, disinformation, and lies about the events that took place on January 6, 2021. This may have been the longest-running hoax, specifically, that former President Trump knew there would be violence that day and did nothing to stop it--in fact, he may have been the catalyst,

Chairman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) of the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight has newly released transcripts to back it up. In a press release Friday, Loudermilk said the Pentagon mucky-mucks simply ignored Trump’s requests, saying:

“Pentagon leadership prioritized concerns of optics over their duty to protect lives. President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders and directed them to make sure any events on January 6, 2021 were safe. It is very concerning that these Senior Pentagon officials ignored President Trump’s guidance AND misled Congressional Leaders to believe they were doing their job, when they were not. The DoD IG’s report is fundamentally flawed. It does not draw conclusions from the interviews they conducted, but pushes a narrative to keep their hands clean. We have many questions for them, and we will continue to dig until we are satisfied the American people know the truth."

President Trump directed senior DoD leaders to ensure events on J6 be safe but they ignored him and put optics over security in order to push a fake narrative in their IG report.

The American people deserve the full truth.https://t.co/2sAxqsvoZe— Rep. Barry Loudermilk (@RepLoudermilk) September 20, 2024

This comes as no surprise, but the transcripts are mind blowing, basically telling then-President Trump to take a hike:

🚨BREAKING: Transcripts obtained by the House Oversight Committee CONFIRM that President Trump DID INDEED ask for the National Guard on JANUARY 3, 2021 to make sure JANUARY 6 would be safe.

Gen. Milley, not the best buddy of President Trump, confirmed that he said this:

“Make sure that you have sufficient National… pic.twitter.com/MKx66oEuRw— ᴊᴀᴄᴋ ᴅᴀɴɢᴇʀ (@AmericazOutlaw) September 20, 2024

MILLEY: The President just said, "Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th. Make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event."

[POTUS said] “Hey, I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make it safe.”

Obviously, Milley couldn't give a rat's nether regions to listen to his boss and it all hit the proverbial fan.

Then-Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s comments are very shocking as he recalls Trump asking for troops but just assumed it was simply "presidential banter." He clearly made an ass of himself by ASSuming:

[On January 6, 2021] everyone was like, “Did you listen to the President’s speech?” I’m like “the guy speaks for 90 minutes like it’s Castro or something.’ I’ve got work to do."

Anyone who speaks that way about the commander-in-chief while serving under him is disgusting and should have been summarily fired or perhaps had some legal action taken against him. He clearly said that regardless of his orders, he was going to do whatever the hell he wanted to do:

“There was absolutely – there is absolutely no way I was putting U.S. military forces at the Capitol, period.”

That is pure disobedience and insubordination. It was the decision of his superior, the commander-in-chief, and he refused to comply.

And finally, the then-Chief Steven Sund of the Capitol Police said the Pentagon cared more about “optics” than keeping people safe. When he requested assistance, the Secretary of the Army's representative said,  “I don’t like the optics of the National Guard standing in a line with the Capitol in the background.”

No heads will roll, I suspect, and that is the most unfortunate part of all this, besides the probability that the legacy media will never expose what happened back then.

Tweet

Pro-Hamassholes try to storm White House grounds: DC cops and Secret Service engage

They waved Palestinian flags atop American memorials and did their monkey-see, monkey-do chant, "from the river to the sea, yadda yadda yadda yee." Some even did the "hey hey, ho ho, something something's gotta go." All were ant-Israel/anti-Semitic and supported the terrorists as they did the "March on Washington for Gaza."

They threw objects at the police and the rioters engaged in "destructive behavior," and while no staff member in the White House was injured, they had to be relocated, the Secret Service revealed. Biden was at Camp David at the time of the riot.

Fences were damaged and the so called peaceful demonstrators chanted "Cease fire now," and "Free, Free Palestine." Other chants were "Yemen, Yemen make us proud--turn another ship around." 

It's highly likely the pro-Hamasshole demonstrators were being paid to partake in the antics, but the source of their funding isn't known, nor is it a fact.

"During the demonstration near the White House complex Jan. 13, a portion of the anti-scale fencing that was erected for the event sustained temporary damage," the statement read. "The issues were promptly repaired on site by U.S. Secret Service support teams."

"As a precaution, some members of the media and staff in proximity to Pennsylvania Avenue were temporarily relocated while the issue was being addressed," the statement continued. "The Secret Service made no arrests associated with the march and there was no property damage to the White House or adjacent buildings."

Julio Rosas posted the riot on X and provided the video below:

🚨: DC police and Secret Service had to rush to one part of the security fence to prevent a breach from the Palestinian crowd. pic.twitter.com/CQFkE6q9nn— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) January 13, 2024

NBC reported that “people in the U.S. capital held aloft signs questioning President Joe Biden’s viability as a presidential candidate because of his staunch support for Israel in the nearly 100-day war against Hamas.” Some of the signs read: “No votes for Genocide Joe,” "Let Gaza Live, and"“Biden has blood on his hands."

These idiots obviously don't know the meaning of the word 'genocide.' 

The network also pointed out that capitalism was alive and well, however, as  “vendors were also selling South African flags as protesters chanted slogans in support of the country whose accusations of genocide against Israel prompted the International Court of Justice in the Hague, Netherlands, to take up the case.” Of course NBC didn't mention capitalism but you get the point.

Non-essential employees at The White House have been told to leave the building and pro-Palestinian and Pro-Yemen protesters are saying, "Break it down!"

Meanwhile, the January 6 protesters are languishing in prison as anti-Semitism along with anti-America marches on.

Tweet

Steve Cohen beclowns himself

Dum. Rep. Steve Cohen (TN) is living proof that many politicians are as bright as a black hole. Remember, this is the same dummy who ate a bucket of fried chicken in the House of Representatives during Bill Barr's hearing and has the self-awareness of a stone.

So Cohen sharing a photo of himself on X that makes him look like a complete putz, should not come as a surprise to anyone. But the online response to the post was, as the kids say, priceless.

Now all you have to do is look at the photo above to conclude that Cohen is an idiot. Who puts a see-through condom on their head while trying to make a serious point, albeit a false one? Steve Cohen, that's who.

Anyway, his tweet was attacked on the platform immediately upon the posting:

If you almost died that day it was only due to the bag you were wearing over your head— Meghan Maureen (@Keggs719) January 6, 2024

Why would you post this photo lol— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeacefull) January 6, 2024

What a freaking human dildo. https://t.co/kmyCcowm5N— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) January 7, 2024

And this was just the tip of the floating Tootsie Roll in the pool.

Tweet