Comedy News Network's (CNN) Stelter does it again

Brian Stelter appearing on "CNN Hoes"

They don't call it the Comedy News Network for nothing. Their "Reliable Sources" [hahahahaha] host, Brian Stelter told a knee-slapper on Sunday when he criticized conservative pundits and talk radio hosts for speculation about presumptive Democratic nominee Joe "C'mon, Man" Biden's cognitive ability and fitness for the presidency after he, the bald-headed dolt, did the same with President Trump for years.

And if you think that Biden isn't being told to hide away from the public, ask yourself why is his wife, Jill Biden, appearing in public, but not the presumptive nominee.

Stelter joshed with the American public when he called recent criticism of Biden's mental health "mind boggling," "offensive" and then went on to label that kind of rhetoric "negative partisanship."

Really? Has he not been listening to Biden's blather? His forgetfulness? His lack of orientation to person, place and time? Does Stelter think that just because Biden went on a bike ride [sans helmet, by the way, but wearing a mask ON A BIKE RIDE!] that this makes him fit to run the most powerful nation on the planet?

“At some point, don't Stelter’s bosses have to recognize what an absolute embarrassment he is to their network?” conservative strategist Chris Barron told Fox News. “Stelter spent weeks wildly spreading baseless conspiracy theories about Trump’s mental health and now he has the audacity to question others asking questions about Biden?”

“It is so hateful,” Stelter whined, a tear slowly meandering down his chubby cheek, claiming that “negative partnership” directed at Biden from the right is more extreme than anything the left says about Trump.

C'mon, man. Give me a break.

Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson said he couldn’t fathom what he was hearing and told Fox News that Stelter’s commentary and show raises a very serious question.

Perhaps it's Stelter whose cognitive decline needs a looking into.

“Has Brian Stelter ever watched CNN, which demeans Trump around the clock as a racist, mentally unstable Putin puppet? Or any of the other major networks that spread Russia collusion conspiracy theories for years, and whose reporters go to White House press conferences for the sole purpose of trying to bait Trump into a reaction so they can get retweets on Twitter?” Jacobson asked.

Evidently not, if he isn't being dishonest.

When even the Young Turks, the far-left lunatic podcast, questions Biden's brain, as did other liberals like Joe Rogan, you know that Stelter is just being funny. And let's not forget that The Babylon Bee has gone after Biden's mental health recently after his gaffes were no longer funny but an area of concern.

Photo: Babylon Bee

Stelter told his 32 viewers on Sunday that only far-right conservatives would ask such questions [of a presidential candidate who may be demented].

“Is the president of the United States a racist? Stelter asked to open an episode of his show in 2017. “Is he suffering from some kind of illness? Is he fit for office? And if he is unfit, then what?”

Is Brian Stelter a self-loathing racist? Is he suffering from an incurable mental illness? Does he lose a hair follicle every time he lies? Although he is fit for CNN, is he he fit for TV? If not, then what? If not him, who?

Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor mocked the segment as “four liberal journalists sitting around pretending liberal journalism doesn’t exist,” simply to make a point.

“Brian Stelter spends every show like he’s trying to do a remake of the movie ‘Clueless’ but for a much smaller audience,” Gainor told Fox News. “He complains about ‘negative partisanship’ when he runs the most negatively partisan show in the history of television.”

“This is the same Stelter who said Trump’s actions could be described as ‘crazy,” Gainor said. “Now he’s incensed that anyone might question Biden’s diminished mental ability and calls such comments ‘offensive and otherworldly.’ What’s offensive is that Stelter claims his show is about journalism.”

Hahahahaha. So true. Stelter is a bald-headed dolt.

Stelter then tried to gaslight his meager audience and said that “entire media companies essentially exist to tear down Joe Biden,” and asked if there is “an equivalent to that on the left to tear down Trump.”

Hmm. I can think of a few "equivalent" media outlets, Brian. Where do you keep your head when you're not being a moron? I think I know.

Consider following Brain Flushings, it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Communist News Network's Jim Acosta tries to divide America and hurt COVID-19 efforts

CNN's Jim Acosta has once again proven that not only is he not a journalist but a useful idiot for the Communist Party, but that he would want to see President Trump's efforts at getting the government to deal with the COVID-19 [coronavirus] fail and allow Americans to die in the process.

There's little doubt that this is the Communist News Network's latest attempt to weaponize coronavirus against President Trump. [H/T Fox News]

Acosta’s story headlined, “Source: Trump is concerned about coming into contact with people infected with coronavirus,” cited a single source “close to” the president who said Trump is worried after coming into contact with a Brazilian official who tested positive for coronavirus. The president of Brazil also later tested positive for the virus.

"See, I'm touching you; I'm touching you."

Acosta, on the other hand, says that he welcomes contact with those infected with the virus that has now become a pandemic. "I touch strangers; I touch children," he said, "and I'm going to continue touching people no matter what the cost to my personal safety. Trump doesn't have the guts to touch people with coronavirus because, unlike me and Brian Stelter, we enjoy the touch and contact with strangers."

Reacting to Acosta's words Media Research Center Vice President Dan Gainor told Fox News: "This is them most idiotic thing I've seen all week. And this week that's saying something. Of course, ‘Trump is concerned about coming into contact with people infected with coronavirus.’ We all are. And we're all supposed to be. That's how you stop a virus, by being concerned about who you interact with and taking precautions.”

“I know Jim Acosta hates Trump. But this is even stupid for one of the most ridiculous figures in the history of journalism. What's amazing is Acosta isn't even good at trolling Trump. All he does is embarrass CNN and further degrade the news industry,” Gainor said. “CNN is trying to hurt Trump and divide our country in a time of national crisis.”

DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall said that Acosta’s story “clearly falls into the category of ‘this is not news’” and simply the latest example of CNN’s anti-Trump business model.

“That CNN and it's White House correspondent want to make a big deal out of a normal concern is just more indication of their wide-ranging agenda to pester the Trump administration,” McCall told Fox News.

But Acosta doubled-down: "I welcome a fight with COVID-19. I'm not afraid a little microscopic organism can hurt me--I'm Jim Freaking Acosta."

The O Estado de S. Paulo newspaper reported Thursday that Fabio Wajngarten, met with President Trump in Mar-A-Lago on Saturday, tested positive for the virus early Wednesday. Health officials confirmed the diagnosis. 

Friday, Fox News confirmed that Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil's president who also met with Trump on Saturday, also tested positive. This may be a factor in President Trump's concern--he is, at the age of 73, within the parameters of those most highly vulnerable to the virus.

This story is what is known as a CNN "scoop."

“Any sensible person would prefer to avoid the virus, so reporting that Trump is concerned is really a ‘so what?’ moment journalistically,” McCall said. “Using an unnamed source to leak this story when there are plenty of on-the-record sources available to the media to discuss the matter is also curious. Given the many other important aspects of the COVID-19 situation that need attention, this comes off as a real journalistic tangent and waste of time.”

Gainor’s colleague, MRC director Tom Graham, joked that the alternative headline could have been, “EVERYONE is concerned about coming into contact with people infected with coronavirus.”

It's time for Jim Acosta to do what he is more suited for: becoming a test pilot. Yes, he can test the pilot light of old gas stoves that still use a pilot light rather than the modern day igniter. If Acosta can blow out the tiny flame, the stove is considered defective . . .  like his thinking.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet

ABC News' take on Trump at Bush funeral 'despicable garbage' says critics

It's getting disgusting. The state of this divided nation is horrible and it's being spearheaded by what is supposed to be the voice of honesty and reason: the media.

ABC News cretins kidded about President Trump’s vision for his own state funeral on Wednesday as he attended the funeral of George H.W. Bush. The insensitive leftist "reporters" joked about what Trump would expect compared to the services for George H. W. Bush.

“Probably a different tone in that funeral… first he’s going to choreograph it, so there might be more trumpets and fanfare,” ABC chief foreign correspondent Terry Moran [aka: "The Moron"] said on the network's livestream of the Bush funeral.

ABC correspondent Devin Dwyer [aka: "The Moron's Dumber Bro"] chimed in, “Yes, he would do it bigger, one would imagine.”

Moran then parroted what he imagined Trump would say, declaring his service would be “the best presidential funeral ever.” He probably doesn't realize that if it was Trump's funeral, he would not be saying anything--he'd be lying there dead. Now you know why they call him "The Moron."

“No one will ever have seen anything like that funeral,” Moran continued, sounding like a high school kid in a locker room.

TheWrap, which quickly noticed the exchange, stated that ABC’s coverage took an “uncomfortable turn” when the discussion shifted to President Trump’s eventual funeral.

Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor told Fox News that Bush’s death “has to be seen through the eyes of journalists who use every single event to attack Trump,” but he found the ABC's segment particularly appalling.

“To mock him during the coverage of the president’s funeral is just despicable garbage. I would say ABC News should apologize, but it wouldn’t be sincere if it did. This is about the billionth example of unprofessional journalism in their attacks on Trump. It’s only more outrageous because of the solemn occasion,” Gainor said.

“It's in bad taste to joke about any of our current leader's future passing,” political comedian Tim Young told Fox News. “But what this highlights again is the media outrage double standard where you can say basically anything you want about a Republican and get away with it.”

Young said that public reaction would be much different if the ABC News reporters joked about Obama's potential future funeral. [You bet your sweet bippie it would be.]

“There would have been full blocks of TV dedicated to 'how disgusting they were' on CNN and forced apologies from their own network,” Young said.

The insensitive moment began as ABC News' livestream waited for the plane carrying the 41st President's remains to depart from Joint Base Andrews after the funeral service at the Washington National Cathedral. The idiots were killing time and lacking actual insight into the Bush presidency, attacked the current one.

“It is, in fact, a repudiation of much of what George Herbert Walker Bush and George Walker Bush stood for, because the people who voted him wanted that repudiation,” Moran said.

ABC News, cowards all, declined comment.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow or not. I hope you do. Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah.

Tweet

Will Disney CEO fire ESPN's Jemele Hill or will he 'let her slide'?

Bob Iger, Disney CEO is being pressured to fire an obvious racist whose racially charged words have angered conservatives and now maybe some NFL bosses.

Iger, like Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Mark Cuban, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Andrew Cuomo, Al Franken, Kamala Harris, Jay Inslee, Tim Kaine, Terry McAuliffe, John Hickenlooper, Martin O'Malley, Howard Schultz, Mark Zuckerberg, George Clooney, Rosie O'Donnell, Ozzie and Harriet, may have designs on running against President Trump in 2020, and he might be risking upsetting the leftists. 

Photo: Reuters

And hopefully, those who already ran against Trump, will still be alive in 2020 as the Democratic Party is made up of old men and women who love illegal immigrants more than they love the National Anthem.

From a business standpoint, it would be wise for Iger to ditch the racist Hill. She's definitely bad for business and cannot be too bright for making those remarks.

Calling the president a "white supremacist" and saying that if he "were not white, he never would have been elected," wasn't very smart. One could make a case that if Barack Obama were not black, he'd have not been elected president because he got well over 90 percent of the black vote, and according to Harry Reid, he is clean and well-spoken. [And Democrats don't have a problem with Harry Reid having said that.]

Hill was merely suspended for two weeks on Monday after she violated the company's social media guidelines for the second time in less than a month.

Al Sharptongue defended Jemele Hill because he too is a racist and she is black and Trump is a white Republican. Sharptongue said that Hill's suspension "should NOT go unanswered."

Photo: AP

If there's a buck to be made out of a racial issue, Sharpton's on it like wet on water, or the other simile that I'm not going to write. 

Hill also went after Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones' new policy that his players must stand for the National Anthem. She said that her audience should boycott the team's advertisers. Not smart.

Dan Gainor, the VP of Media Research Center believes Hill has shown sh has "no ethics: and if Iger wants ESPN to remain successful, she needs to go.

"She falsely claimed that President Trump is a white supremacist. She wasn't fired or suspended. She didn't have to apologize to Trump or even take down the posts. But let her say something about lefty ESPN's advertisers and she is suspended instantly," Gainor told Fox News. "If ESPN wants some return to credibility, she can't stay. She wouldn't fit in. But if ESPN wants to stay as what critics call MSESPN, the 'woke' version of sports, then Hill certainly fits in well."

Iger has become more political lately and some are speculating that he, like other people on TV or in politics, has his eyes on the White House. And according the the failing New York Times, Iger is "emerging as a credible contender in the 2020 presidential speculation game," and the left-wing Washington Post has him listed as a top contender to make it onto the Democratic ticket.

Jennifer Saba of Reuters, said Iger's "priorities are all out of whack" because he runs a huge media company ($155 billion) and if he's serious about running against Trump, it shouldn't be at the expense of Disney or Mickey.

Iger admits he was directly involved in the decision to keep Hill on board, mainly because, while he hasn't experienced racism directed at his whiteness, he understands that black Americans are not happy with Trump because of the bull crap his type of media puts out there. It isn't as if the KKK and neo-nazis were laying low while Obama was president--they just refused to report on it.

This post could go on and on about Hill and Iger, but I won't bore you with the same garbage details about Hill's lame excuses, other than to say that Clay Travis, a Fox Sports radio host, labeled Hill's actions as "one of the dumbest things" he's "ever seen in his life" and wondered if she is "intentionally trying to get fired" in order to get another job.

"If you are in the business that we are in," Travis said on 'Outkick the Show', "your salary is either paid by advertisers or the NFL. Especially at ESPN . . . her entire show is underwritten by these same sponsors."

So it seems as if ESPN endorsed Hill's first tweet about Trump but not the tweet involving the bottom line.

Disgusting!

Tweet

Daily Beast hack apologizes for sexist tweet attacking Huckabee Sanders

The Daily Cesspool Beast "writer" who called White House Press a "butch queen" on Twitter Friday got too many negative responses that forced him to apologize for being a dickweed.

Ira Madison, an uncouth culture writer issued his apology on Twitter on Monday.

Madison, who evidently hates women and gays has written for Gentleman's Quarterly (in spite of his having no idea what a gentleman is), and New York Magazine.

The weasel tweeted:

"Apologies to Sarah H. Sanders for the ill-judged joke tweeted Fri, deleted this AM. I didn't mean to offend anyone & I'm sorry that I did!"

 Twitter users kept calling him out anyway:

"Apologies are great, but not doing in the first place is even better. Try to put your nice cap on next time."

Others, like myself, weren't buying in to his heartfelt sorrow over his bile, and using the term 'butch queen' refers to a gay man who's "neither extremely feminine, nor extremely masculine and can easily portray both mannerisms."

Another tweet read: 

"So sexist and misogynistic comments are acceptable as long as they're aimed at Conservative women. Thanks for clarifying those rules."

Dan Gainor, vice president of business and culture at the Media Research Center, spoke to Fox News. 


"Since the Daily Beast says it values 'an inclusive culture, committed to the public good,' I assume this is the last time Ira Madison III will be writing for them. It goes to a larger point. Liberals get away with personal attacks that would ruin the careers of people on the right. This is demented, but watch how little attention it gets from the national press."


Ira Madison III is a brave man to attack a woman from afar, using Twitter, "The Angry Folks' Social Media Platform." 

The Daily Beast was too cowardly to comment but that's to be expected.


Tweet

Lester Holt: a closet liberal or a full-blown liberal?

Lester Holt may be a registered Republican, but it looks more like a coverup than his true political philosophy. He complied with the wishes of the Clinton campaign and while Trump blew it all by himself on several occasions, Hillary skated.

Holt called out Trump and interrupted him repeatedly, while Clinton got no questions about Benghazi or her emails. Trump, on the other hand, didn't bring it up when the issue of national security came up--that was his golden opportunity and he blew it.

The Clinton campaign gamed the system, according to the MRC (Media Research Center). Holt was in total compliance with their wishes. He pushed the birther issue, Trump's tax returns, and asked him about Clinton being "the first woman nominated by a party" and not having "the look."

The issue of the "deplorables" never once came up and Donald never went there--another big mistake.

It almost felt as if there was a conspiracy going on of a secret agreement between Trump and Clinton whereby he promised to give her the debate. Of course that's nonsense but Alex Jones will probably jump on that idea if it occurs to his paranoid brain. Can't you just see his lede: "Trump purposely throws the debate for Clinton--does she know something about him that she isn't telling?"

Dan Gainor of the MRC discussed six ways in which Clinton got to skate the debate and Holt was in the tank for the former Worst Lady.

First there's the issue of jobs. Holt shot two questions at Trump on how he planned to add jobs in spite of the fact that the first answer talked about renegotiating trade deals.

Next, Holt depicted the liberal tax plans where Clinton wanted to tax the rich and Trump supposedly was "calling for tax cuts for the wealthy." Trump had to correct him, which clearly showed Holt's bias.

On tax returns, Trump got slammed by Holt with questions on "business conflicts" but Hillary was never asked about her emails, her Goldman Sachs and other corporate speeches, or anything about Clinton Foundation business conflicts.

She was also never asked about money the Foundation received from misogynistic countries.

Fourth, Holt asked Trump about the "birther" question which went longer than Clinton's email answer and then asked Trump three separate follow-ups.

And fifth, he attacked Trump for supporting the Iraq War, never discussing how Clinton had voted to do the same. Also, it's important to realize that Trump wasn't privy to information about the Iraq situation whereas Clinton was and still voted for it. Holt never made that distinction either.

Finally, Holt asked Clinton about whether the police in the US are biased against African-Americans. She answered "I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police." Holt ignored the gaffe rather than challenge her wide brushstroke about everyone being bigoted.

I believe that Holt must have taken his cue as moderator from Candy Crowley. He was like a third debater and failed miserably, but so did Donald Trump.

Trump missed golden opportunities to destroy Clinton's position in the debate. When she accused him of being chummy with Putin, he might have replied, "I think he knows more about you, Hillary, just from reading through your emails."

It should never be the role of journalists to be the ones to make the news, anymore than an umpire or referee should determine the outcome of a game. Both sides need to be prepared, know the facts and challenge lies. It is never up to journalists to determine what is truth and what is lie.

Sometimes I wish the candidates could bring along YouTube video to prove their points. Both sides would be proven liars and the public would then have more information to make better informed decisions.

I think Clinton won this debate and I wish it wasn't so. But I'm not going to pretend that she didn't, in my opinion. Trump needs to monitor his narcissism (all presidential candidates need to be narcissistic in order to run for that office) and anticipate her strategy better than he did this time. He also needs to be able to use her attacks to his advantage--there's so much dirt on Clinton that just got swept under the carpet this time.

Finally, Trump's excuse to lay off Clinton because her family was in the room, and that he thinks Chelsea is a nice person, is not a good reason to throw the debate. 

Just lift the carpet and you'll easily show us the dirt. Chelsea knows it's there--she probably helped put it there.

Tweet