San Jose to hang gay flags near new Chick-fil-A

The woke folk of the San Jose City Council voted to hang rainbow flags next to a future location of a Chick-fil-A to support the city's gay community. If history tells us anything, it's saying, "Great. This should generate tons of business the Chick-fil-A way." The fast, delicious food chain has faced previous boycotts over people who oppose Judeo-Christian beliefs and this has led a huge increase in business.

Chick-fil-A has been blocked from opening up in airports in San Antonio and Buffalo, N.Y., in recent weeks, and this seems to be unconstitutional.

The San Jose City Council voted unanimously to post the flags near the airport Chick-fil-A after the idea was suggested by Santa Clara County’s first openly gay elected official, Ken Yeager, according to NBC News. Yeager appears to be using his gayness to satisfy his needs for approval--the election win wasn't enough.

"I made the suggestion to put the flags next to the restaurant, and council members liked that idea but also said that maybe put flags elsewhere, too, like outside,” Yeager told the news outlet. The airport [?] will decide where the flags will be placed, an airport spokesperson told NBC.

Chick-fil-A does not have an anti-gay agenda: it serves and hires gay people and all members of the LGBTQRSTUVW community and said this contributes to “an inaccurate narrative about our brand.”

"We want to make it clear that our sole focus is on providing delicious food and welcoming everyone — not being a part of a national political conversation," the fast food chain said in a statement last week. "We do not have a political or social agenda.”

They simply have a CEO who is a Christian and does not believe in same sex marriage. He's allowed to have his religious beliefs and should not have to be attacked for them.

He denies nobody gay rights. Why do they deny him his religious rights?


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Trump supporters can sue San Jose cops after 2016 attack as they stood by and let riots ensue

Screen-grab/Fox News

Trump supporters were pelted with eggs, punches, had their clothing ripped off and now they plan to sue the San Jose police who allegedly failed to protect them and added to the danger they faced.

The Trump supporters were attending a rally at the McEnery Convention Center, many wore MAGA hats. They were met with hundreds of anti-Trump trouble makers as they were shepherded out of the building via a single exit to ensure an easier target for the miscreants to attack them as a group.

The suit's 20 plaintiffs claim in a lawsuit that the cops knowingly ordered them to leave through an exit where the scumbags were waiting for them, despite the existence of a safer route and other exits where they could avoid a conflict, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The plaintiffs say they were beaten or struck by objects thrown by the [cowardly] protesters. Initial accounts said that at least one woman was struck by an egg after she was surrounded by the brave pussywillows.

One plaintiff alleged that an officer told her police were instructed to not intervene in the scuffle.

Screen-grab/Fox News

The lawsuit said three people were allegedly arrested for assaulting the brave police officers at the scene, but no arrests were made for attacking the Trump supporters--that was not only allowed, apparently it was the design of the city.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said on Friday that if the allegations are true, "the officers acted with deliberate indifference to a known and obvious danger" and violated the constitutional rights of Trump supporters [aka Americans].

San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia praised his cops after the rally for "their effectiveness and their restraint," while city lawyers said cops did not create [nor ameliorate] the danger and should not be second-guessed for legitimate law enforcement decisions.

What a load of garbage. Even the court said the cops on duty, according to the allegations, knew about the violence at past pro-Trump rallies.

"The attendees allege the officers shepherded them into a violent crowd of protesters and actively prevented them from reaching safety," Judge Dorothy Nelson said in the 3-0 ruling that upheld a federal judge's refusal to dismiss the suit. "The officers continued to implement this plan even while witnessing the violence firsthand."

They should really be ashamed of themselves.

If the plaintiffs can prove their allegations, they would demonstrate police increased the danger to Trump supporters and knowingly exposed them to risk.

The San Jose City's shyster lawyer, Dick Doyle, told the Chronicle that the city disagrees with the court's view of the law on police liability and his office would consult with the City Council on a possible appeal. Thus, this case may go as far as the Supreme Court, which would likely give a fair judgment now that there will be a conservative majority soon.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and feel free to take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

Protesters try to trump Trump

Pelted by eggs by anti-Trumpers

Protesters at a Donald Trump rally in San Jose attacked supporters of the GOP presumptive nominee and created a rowdy scene in which over a dozen people were punched and one woman was pelted with an egg.

According to the leftists, this is all Trump's fault. This has to be due to the fact that leftists have no control over their own behavior and take no responsibility for their actions. Another name for them might be "zombies" or "Clinton Clingons," but Donald Trump is not responsible.

Thinking like that is similar to the abusive husband who blames his wife for "making [me] beat the crap out of [you]."

I could go on with how the anti-Trump rioters grabbed Trump hats from supporters and set the hats on fire; or how they threw eggs at a young woman (cowardly pond scum), but the point is missed. The point being about assigning blame.

"Do you think Hillary Clinton knew of Bill's affairs?"

You cannot make me hit you unless you grab my hand, ball it into a fist, and throw it toward you against my will. Even then, I suspect you wouldn't be successful in making me punch you.

Fox News, in their quest to look fair and balanced, invariably has a libtard on the programming to make the leftist point of view (see Geraldo Rivera, Alan Colmes, Robert Zimmerman and Juan Williams, for examples). 

I believe many conservatives already know their point of view and are becoming weary of hearing it over and over. If we want to hear something over and over it ought to be the conservative point of view (as long as it isn't Sean-Women-in-Saudi-Arabia-Can't-Drive-a-Car-Hannity).

Finally, I would not be in the least surprised to learn that George Soros is behind these protesters. If he could help the Nazis in WW2, he could help a socialist like Sanders or a felon like Clinton.


Tweet