Potty-mouth protesters have no points to make so they scream vulgarity at Pete Hegseth

Another day, another high-strung meltdown in the nation's capital.

A brave new world of elite defense strategy met the fragile world of professional outrage on Wednesday as a handful of self-appointed hall monitors tried to shut down War Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Association of the United States Army’s annual conference in Washington. 

Senior military leaders had gathered to discuss the Pentagon’s plans for autonomous warfare, but the proceedings were repeatedly interrupted by foul-mouthed performance artists posing as protesters.

At least five times in the first half hour of a panel, potty-mouthed anti-war agitators hollered at Hegseth, treating a defense trade show like an open-mic night for emotional catharsis. They hurled sophisticated policy critiques such as calling him a "f---ing Nazi," a "war criminal," and a "coward." It is believed that their collective IQs add up to 14.

Hegseth responded with chuckles and sarcastic comments, at first, maintaining the composure of a man who has heard better insults from third-graders. But his reactions became increasingly short and irritated as he slammed the semi-coordinated ambush as one-by-one malcontents popped up around the room like caffeinated prairie dogs in Washington, D.C.

"You’re not a warrior you’re a coward!" one demonstrator shouted at Hegseth. "Children in Gaza are starving! He is a war criminal!"

"She thinks highly of me," the Pentagon chief quipped after one outburst, which led to brief applause from a crowd that actually knows what a defense conference is for.

The disrupters were scattered strategically throughout the room, carefully pausing for dramatic effect between tantrums to maximize their screen time. As Hegseth spotted the pattern behind the chaos, he noted: "Appears we have a bit of a tactic."

"The protesters are spouting off slogans, Iran really will never have a nuclear weapon," he later added. [He might have also pointed out that Iran is supporting the Democratic Party.]

Event security eventually escorted the theatrical geniuses out, with at least one dedicated activist needing to be carried bodily out of the venue while keeping up a valiant, high-decibel rodent sounding squeal for the cameras.

"The First Amendment right to protest is fundamental. However, everyone who registers to attend the Annual Meeting and enters the convention center does so after agreeing to abide by a code of conduct, so the protestors’ outbursts were certainly not appropriate during today’s forum," the Association of the U.S. Army said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

"The acting Army Secretary organized, and we were honored to host, a historic forum to discuss a critical issue that directly affects national security. We’re grateful for the swift action of security and the Metropolitan Police Department to ensure this important discussion could continue."

"Mommeee"

The panel alongside Hegseth featured acting Army Secretary Adam Telle, acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink, and Assistant Secretary for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict Derrick Evans.

Hey patriots! Please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.

As the background noise dragged on, the speakers simply decided that America’s national defense is slightly more important than catering to adult temper tantrums, stopping their pauses and talking straight through the noise. It remains a profound mystery how individuals with such utter disdain for military readiness managed to secure credentials for an event explicitly designed for Army brass and defense contractors.

The panel focused on Project Agincourt, the Pentagon’s high-tech initiative to accelerate the development and deployment of autonomous weapons systems. Hegseth joined senior leadership to discuss how America plans to integrate drones, robotics, and advanced autonomous technologies to keep the nation safe, secure, and light-years ahead of any adversaries who prefer actual fighting over indoor screaming.

Tweet

Biden drops "F Bombs" when his age is brought up

November 20, 1942. The Alaska Highway officially opens, Soviets attacks German southern flank in Stalingrad; the British Eighth Army takes Benghazi but discovers the Nazis destroyed the port; Gen. Paul von Kleist becomes the commander of German Army Group A on the Eastern Front, and Joseph Robinette Biden is born.

Biden is the oldest and most incompetent president to ever hold office and he's hoping to run again in 2024 if he's still alive. As it is, his health, particularly his obvious cognitive downward spiral, has become an issue for voters.

Biden has routinely given public appearances where his senility and self-censoring inability are as obvious as Lizzo's adipose tissue, and as time goes by, Joe gets observably worse.

However, when Biden's age is brought up in public, he often begins launching into potty-mouth tirades, due to that lack of self-censoring ability.

Nov. 30, 1942 cover of Life Magazine

Old Joe recently vented to his friends, as Politico reported Tuesday, "You think I don't know how f**king old I am?" [It's possible he doesn't.] 

If this senile old fart of a political hack runs in the next election, [should he still be turning oxygen into carbon dioxide] he will be closer to 90 than 80. And let's be honest, should her run, and should he win a second term [heaven forfend] it's really unlikely he would finish out the term if his cognitive decline continues along the same vegetative path.

One thing that's obvious: Joe Biden cares more about some bull crap Biden legacy than he cares about the nation. If he had any self-awareness and love for the country he pretends to love, he would not run. In fact, he would have never ran for the job in the first place. The problem is, stupid people don't know that they're stupid.

Joe cannot string two coherent sentences together unless he's reading them from a teleprompter, and even then it's a crapshoot. He has the memory of a special needs goldfish and would be better served, as would the nation, if he was put into a retirement home where his only care would be what flavor of ice cream is being served after his blender-ized supper.

His wife, the world renown doctor, Doctor Jill Biden, should be arrested for elder abuse.

Tweet

Liberal hypocrites still stuck on a word they all use to dump Trump

Hypocrites in the Democratic Party said Friday they will try to censure President Trump next week for saying something similar to what other presidents have said, like when President Obama called Libya a s**tshow. 

Or when Lyndon B. Johnson was asked why he didn't take a speech by Richard Nixon more seriously when he was Senate majority leader and Nixon was Vice President and responded, "Boys, I may not know much, bit I do know the difference between chicken s**t and chicken salad."

Or in 2003 when then Sen. John "Hair-plugs" Kerry told Rolling Stone about his decision to vote for the Iraq war, said, "Did I expect George Bush to f**k it up as badly as he did? I don't think anybody did."

Or in 2008 when former president Clinton was upset as Obama overtook Hillary in the primaries. He didn't know anyone could hear him, after an interview with a radio station in Philadelphia that put him on the defense over racial equality issues. Clinton said, "I don't think I should take any s**t from anybody on that, do you?"

So Rep. Cedric Richmond, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus that doesn't allow black conservative congressmen to join, and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, rank Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said they're going to pursue the censure after the MLK Jr. holiday.


Tweet

Maine Rep.Scott Hamann threatens POTUS

Scott Hamann, a Maine lawmaker, posted his opinion and threatened President Trump on his social media account which he has since deleted because he is the p*ssy that he labeled President Trump.

In a rant that sounded more like a high school bully grabbing his crotch and challenging the president of the chess team, Hamann called Mr. Trump a "joke," a "rapist" and a p*ssy, and he ended his rant with what clearly sounds like a threat of bodily harm and perhaps even a death threat.

This so-called public servant (more like an idiot savant) posted a rambling diatribe laced with profanity and disgusting language referring to not only Trump, but also to his supporters. 

The keyboard hero posted on Facebook: "Trump is a half term president, at most, especially if I ever get within 10 feet of that p*ssy.

One FB user replied to Hamann's post asking: "Scott Hamann you plan to kill the President?"

The U.S. Secret Service knows of the situation, but officials gave no comment which means there's an investigation into the matter ongoing.

Regarding Trump supporters, Hamann wrote: "I just can't deal with you ignorant people anymore."

Hopefully he won't have to deal with U.S.

Hamann kissed up to Obama saying he "ran quite possibly the classiest 2 term presidency in US history."

Not counting, of course, Solyndra, Benghazi, the Iran deal, Muslim Brotherhood visitors in the White House, doing the "testicle" Pledge of Allegiance, and so much more--just ask any corpse man in any of our 57 states.

The twit deleted his posts but screen grabs of his rants were forwarded to Conservative talk radio host Keith Hanson on WNTK and WUVR in New Hampshire and Vermont. Hanson shared the images with Fox News and Hamann's bosses the statewide hunger relief organization, Good Shepard Food Bank, where Hamann is program director.

The real Good Shepard wouldn't be happy with Hamann's remarks.

Hanson spoke to Fox News: "I had somebody reach out to me and passed screenshots on to me saying that they were concerned about this. . . . This is a Democrat, a liberal, who was threatening the president," Hanson said.

He also said that Hamann confirmed to him, in a private FB message chain, that he did, in fact, post those comments.

So Hamann messaged Hanson with: "Hi Keith. Contacting my employer over a facebook comment I made to an old friend? I'm sorry if the truth triggered you so much that you felt it was a good idea to send a screenshot to my employer. 
"'Profanity-laden'?? Are you kidding me? The only swear words in the image you posted were a**, pr*cks, and Trump. Too much for a snowflake, then don't read comments between me and my childhood friend."

Then like a true hero Hamann added, "if anything negative comes from your attack on my employment, my attorney will be in touch. Cease and desist."

Hanson was shocked that an elected official could say such hateful things against the president. "When you are selected to become the voice of an electorate, you have a huge responsibility to be policing your words and representing your constituents at the best of your ability," Hanson told Fox News. "What was surprising to me was that anybody with half a brain would have said 'those aren't my comments.'"

Maine Republican Party Chairman Demi Kouzounas posted Hamann's vitriol to the Maine GOP Twitter page on Wednesday which was soon followed by the Maine State House Majority Office's release of Hamann's apology b*ll s*it:

"While the tone of the post was born out of frustration with the vile language currently surrounding politics, I should not have responded with the same language. This is not language I typically use, it does not reflect my personal values, and while misguided, it was intended to make a visceral point about the developing political discourse in America [which then discredits his statement that he "should not have responded with the same language]."

Evidently Hamann is taking the Democrat's lead in vile language, but to blame his frustration on "language currently surrounding politics" is a cowardly copout. 

Then to disown the fact that he threatened to harm the President because it "doesn't reflect (my) personal values" is at best admitting he's a liar, and more probably, a person of interest to the U.S. Secret Service. 

I hope for the latter. 

We should all be sick and tired of people threatening a U.S. President, whether you like Trump or hate him. If you don't respect the office of the President, then you really don't respect the country that voted the President into the office.

Tweet

Flushing out the potty-mouth Dems

(Photo: Heat Street)

Sinister Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Dummycrat told The Hill in 2014 "I try very hard not to swear at home," dammit.

But now she swears everywhere, even in her dreams of becoming THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Oh wait, that was Hillary Clinton's line.

It's 2017 and now the feisty foul-mouth femme has been dropping the "F-bomb" like a Clinton drops his drawers. Gillibrand does it publicly and privately. 

Her friends think there's something wrong with her, and they may be on to something.

She spoke to the Personal Democracy Forum last week and used the "f" word three f**king times. That's f**ked up. Last month, in a New York Magazine interview she dropped three "F-bombs."

This has become a recent trend among Dummycrats. 

The Democratic National Committee Chairperson Tom Perez, made a speech with children both in the audience and on stage. 

Children.

Perez attacked President Trump as someone who "doesn't give a sh*t about healthcare," and said, "you're g*damn right," Trump is a liar.

Then there's the Texas Dummycrat Congressman Beto O'Rourke who is challenging Sen. Ted Cruz for the job. He said that Cruz is "sure as sh*t not serving" his constituents.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) dropped an "F-bomb" at a public event in San Francisco while children were within f**king earshot. 

This foul-mouthed language is the new normal for the leftists who obviously have done careful analysis and focus group studies to see how it would play. It appears to be aimed at millennials and people with low self-esteem who don't believe they deserve to be spoken to with professionalism and respect. And they also don't give a rat's a** if their kids hear it too.

It used to be that whenever a politician used profanity, it was by accident and part of his or her passion about an issue. Now it's calculated, fake and demeaning of the audience to which it is addressed.

Yes, President Trump used it when he said, for example, that he would "bomb the sh*t out of ISIS." In fact, that's why the left is using it today--because it worked for Trump.

The profanity of the left is intentional and designed to show outrage to their donors and activists in order to demonstrate their strong resistance to Trump. It's also designed to get them headlines.

There is a total lack of honesty behind these bawdy words. These Democrats are as authentic in their emoting as a prostitute's vow of love. 

The question is, how naive are the voters who listen to this dreck? 

When you hear Gillibrand, Perez and the rest of them drop expletives, the phoniness oozes through their naughty words. Many voters aren't as stupid as Democrats would hope them to be. They can spot the ploy as well as the hypocrisy.

When Trump swore, the Clinton campaign put out an ad saying that 'Our children are listening." Now they're selling t-shirts about Perez's comment: "Democrats give a sh*t about people."

If the message the Democrats used in the campaign was that Trump was too vulgar and callous to be President, what does it say about the Democratic Party?

Wouldn't it be great if the party with an ass as its mascot wouldn't act like such asses themselves?



Tweet

FCC:a not guts, no ethics

Showing his holster

You can't even write in a blog what Colbert said on the air about President Trump, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is letting him get away with it. That sucks.

And if I can say 'that sucks' and get away with it, you can imagine what Colbert actually said. If you don't know, you might be living in a box in North Korea.

The FCC said on Tuesday that it isn't going to take any action whatsoever against the foul-mouth scumcrumpet, Steven Colbert because they work for the government and they're here to help. 

They will not do anything against "Late Show with Stephen Colbert." They do not care that they received thousands of complaints from viewers who were appalled over Colbert's homophobic and generally disgusting reference to oral sex involving Trump and Putin. They are from the government and there is nothing you can do about it.

"Consistent with standard operating procedure, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau has reviewed the complaints and the material that was in the subject of these complaints,"  said a statement by Neil Grace, an FCC spokesman. "The Bureau has concluded that there was nothing actionable under the FCC's rules."

And they had to admit, they found the joke against Trump rather funny.

Colbert also criticized Trump for abruptly ending an interview with CBS News. "Face the Nation" hosted by John Dickerson.

"Sir, you attract more skinheads than free Rogaine," Colbert ignorantly said, thinking that skinheads would actually want to grow hair, or aren't able to grow hair. 

Then he went into a profanity dump and I'm not going to go there.

Suffice it to say, Colbert has the right to say whatever he wants, but not necessarily on national television. But the FCC  does not have the right to be impotent in doing the job we taxpayers expect them to do. 




Tweet

FCC will "investigate" Colbert and his homophobic potty mouth

The Federal Communications Commission said they will "investigate" the rantings of Stephen "Toilet-Mouth" Colbert, but said nothing about DNC head Tom Perez whose mouth spews forth words that usually go down toilets.

Both leftists use vile, disgusting language on national television, and are unapologetic about the disrespect they show toward their audience. Perhaps they don't see it that way because they aren't capable of empathizing with the common folk.

The main reason the FCC is doing anything at all about Colbert's garbage-mouth rant against President Trump on Monday is because they received "a number of complaints" over Colbert's 12-minute monologue on CBS' The Late Show. Some are calling the monologue homophobic, disrespectful and not funny.

FCC commissioner and Trump appointee, Ajit Pai, promised to take "appropriate action" once an investigation is completed. What exactly has to be investigated is unclear, unless it's the actual letter of the law since it's clear what was said. Colbert's show is pretaped and the word "cock" was bleeped out by CBS when it was used to describe President Trump performing oral sex on Vladimir Putin.

Personally, I don't believe that Colbert should be fired, as many are calling for on Twitter, nor do I believe in boycotting Colbert's sponsors because I don't think it would make a real difference and it isn't fair to put the onus on them. 

But I do believe in the free market. If people refuse to watch his show, and his numbers are down, the sponsors would leave on their own.

However, it's possible that Colbert has broken the law and the FCC will have to decide if it finds a violation. "A fine, of some sort, is typically what we do," Pai said.

Due to the fact that Colbert's garbage airs at 11:35 p.m., there is a lower standard of decency since the children are tucked away in bed.

FCC regulations, as per their website, says that all content on broadcast TV must meet a three-tier Supreme Court test to be considered "obscene."

The FCC says: "It must appeal to an average person's prurient interest; depict or describe sexual conduct in a 'patently offensive' way; and, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value."

Anyone who believes that it passes all of those tests is a leftist fool.

In 2004, CBS was fined $550,000 by the FCC when Janet Jackson had her "wardrobe malfunction" during the Super Bowl Halftime Show, exposing her breast. Unfortunately, the fine was appealed and thrown out.

I believe that everyone should be entitled to freedom of speech and expression. Personally, I'm going to express my beliefs with my TV remote.

Tweet

Fareed Zakaria and his potty mouth rant

Liberal commentator who goes by the title of journalist, Fareed Zakaria, went on a potty-mouthed meltdown on live TV.

Zakaria, who may have been secretly in love with Barack Obama, as may be determined by a video (below) that illustrates this possibility. 

Zakaria spoke on the Don Lemon Show where he discussed the President's wiretap claim. He said live on air: 

"I think the President is somewhat indifferent to things that are true or false. He has spent his whole life bull sh***ing. He has succeeded by bull sh***ing. He has gotten into the Presidency by bull sh***ing. It's very hard to tell someone at that point that bull sh*t doesn't work because look at the results?"

When people like Zakaria pretend to be journalists, they are lying to the public. It's disrespecting your audience and it's disrespecting the office of the presidency. Both sides do it, but it's wrong.

Don Lemon didn't know how to react to Zakaria, but as long as he didn't say it against Hillary Clinton, no foul, no harm.

The video of Zakaria's salty language is in the video below. Get the kids out of the room.

This only gives credibility to Trump and his calling out CNN for fake news.



Tweet