Romney Beats Santorum, Paul Beats Gingrich, Gingrich Should Beat It

So Illinois has voted and Romney has won with a clear margin of victory over Santorum and Ron Paul is laughing it up because he doesn't care a fiddler's whatever if he wins anymore delegates because he isn't in it for the presidency--he's in it to send a message and that message is: even an old fart who gave up his medical practice to practice the art of politics can have his own roadies.

But Newt, that dear old genius with the silver tongue and sharp mind, should pack it in and ride off into the sunset. He's done, and he knows it, but his ego has taken over his reasoning and his anger with Mitt has become more important than his party, and I believe he's damaging the GOP's chances of beating Obama in November.  I hope I'm wrong.

The same can be said about Rick Santorum. He has the social conservative vote, but he doesn't have the fiscal conservative nor the independent vote and that bodes poorly for his chances against our divisive socialist leader. And he still looks like he's smelling something funny when he tries to smile.

Well, on Saturday it's on to Louisiana where Rick is slated to win, Paul is slated to be the Constitutional rock star that he is, Mitt is slated to run second, and Newt is slated to have the best darn "we're still going all the way" speech you've ever heard. And all the while this circus keeps playing on and on, Obama is thinking his chances of stealing a second term, a term where he can really go for socialist broke, is getting to be a foregone conclusion.

Peace out. 

If you are interested in Islamic terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--I have provided the links below.  A New York City reporter is taken hostage by terrorists and must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe      

click here for ebook version  

Tweet

Our Horrifying Marines, Shame Shame

In case you haven't guessed it, the title of this piece is pure sarcasm.  I'm a former Marine and I'm totally horrified at our government for being horrified at Marines, in a time of war, with an enemy who has defined the word "horrify" by it's terrorist acts against humanity. I believe it's okay to be angry at those who would kill you, kill your family, and destroy civilization as we know it in the West--I'm funny that way.  After a firefight, one comes away with incredibly strong emotions, much of which is anger and relief, some of which is revenge toward those who tried to kill you.

Of course those Marines were foolish to have recorded and displayed what they had done. But is that worse than the recording of Daniel Pearls being beheaded on YouTube? The pregnant woman being shot in the back of the head by a Taliban "hero"? The children suicide bomber recruited by the Taliban?

The left is going to say that when we commit atrocities, we are no better than our enemies.  This is blatant BS of the highest order.  We are above and beyond better than the Islamic jihadists who would kill you for calling Mohammad a pedophile just because he married a 6 year old child and raped her when she was 9.

Peeing on a dead Taliban terrorist is certainly not worse than shooting women trying to get an education, or hanging gays for being what they cannot help being; or killing Jews for being Jews.  I don't condone what the Marines did, but I certainly understand their release of pent up testosterone.

It's interesting that the media condemns this and will not let the story go away, but when an OWS protestor defecated on an American flag, and another slime ball defecated on a NYC Police vehicle, this was a non-story.  When the same protestors made anti-Semitic statements, both verbally and on their posters, the media, except for Fox News, never even covered it. This is why the left hates Fox News:  "They distort the truth," they say.  The only thing they "distort" is the leftist, anti-American message the media loves to tell. To this day, The New York Times still refuses to admit Alger Hiss was a Communist spy, even though he admitted it!  Then we have Newsweek ragazine with Obama's arrogant pose on the cover asking us "Why Are Obama's Critics So Dumb?" The inside story by Andrew-I'm Proud-to-Wash-Obama's-shorts-Sullivan, tells the lefty reader how liberals aren't at all as retarded as they act, but conservatives are dumb. So, if you criticize Obama, you're dumb. Nyah nyah nyah. 

"Four more terms"

I predict for the coming election, the left is going to claim Republicans are racists, stupid, and only out for the rich.  If you look at history you will see that this isn't true. If you know anything about psychology, you will realize that making these claims about Republicans, is something called "projection."

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for both the hard copy (soft cover) edition and the eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  Zed must somehow escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Free Ebook "Conservatweets"  http://tinyurl.com/6p69cb7

Tweet

George Stephanococcus Disease: Why the Right is Stupid

 If Obama gets re-elected, buy gold. If Ron Paul gets elected, move to a safer country. If Huntsman gets elected, learn Chinese, because what he didn't do as Ambassador to China was challenge them when they hacked into our nationwide power grids, thereby having the same capabilities as a nuclear pulse bomb would have on the nation's electrical output.

But seriously, weren't the last debates the absolute most boring debates you've seen thus far?  George Stephanococcus, the new disease that spreads liberally throughout the land, should not be taken seriously by conservatives, and the fact that the Republicans entertained ABC by agreeing to a debate where the panel obviously tries to ambush them with their questions, is ridiculous.  

Josef Pulitzer scratching

At least Diane Sawyer was too stoned to be an effective Democratic party campaigner, although she tried. At least she didn't throw out some unconfirmed statistic on Mitt's job creating numbers, and she didn't ask "what if" questions about birth control, like Georgie boy did. It is un-freaking-believable how transparent their agenda is--and they used to call it journalism.


Journalism is dead--as dead as Josef Pulitzer, as dead as the credibility of the "Gray Lady.

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

 http://tinyurl.com/6p69cb7    FREE Smashwords version of “Conservatweets “

Tweet

A Cain Mutiny on the Horizon?

Sharon Bialek: "Just trying to help other women"

A man is innocent until proven guilty. A politician is guilty until proven innocent. This is a classic case of his word against her word--the case of Sharon Bialek against Herman Cain. There had been previous anonymous allegations, but now we have an actual person making the accusations. Mark Levin asked if Cain was a Democrat, would these allegations have been made? I doubt it. Whether these allegations are true, is almost irrelevant to what the outcome will likely be, which will be the sinking of the Cain ship, and there likely will also be a Cain mutiny by his staff.

Allred doing it her way as Hillary Clinton

Bialek is being represented by Gloria Allred, a twice-divorced, high profile attorney who is often seen on TV commented on legal cases. She represented Amber Frey, a witness is the Scott Peterson case, and sued the Boy Scouts of America for excluding an 11 year old girl in a case referred to as "gender apartheid." She also sued the Sav-On Drugstore chain for having the audacity to have a separate seciton for boys and girls. There are other cases, too numerous to mention, but for those interested, you can Google Gloria Allred and read all about her pursuit of blurring the gender differences between boys and girls, men and women. After completing your research of this litigation machine, you may wonder whether her middle name might be Sue.


I don't know how Herman Cain is going to go on campaigning from here, but perhaps he can consult with Bill Clinton and be provided with some pointers. Perhaps if Mr. Cain became a Democrat, all would be forgiven.  Herman has denied these allegations, but it doesn't look good for the guy.

What hypocrisy.



Tweet

Vetting Cain--What About Obama?

Welcome to the big leagues, Mr. Cain. Now that the left believes you're a viable candidate, you will be their favorite target. You wisely pointed that out when you said you have a target on your back, but now everyone can see it and you might just be feeling the arrow sticking out from the bullseye.

I have always believed that our system of justice is the best in the world, that a person is innocent until proven guilty, but how many people will give Cain the benefit of the doubt? It seems to be human nature to believe a person is guilty of what he or she is being accused of, or else, why would they be accused of wrongdoing in the first place, and that's the shame of it. 

Many conservatives will probably write Herman Cain off as a potential candidate for the Republican presidential nomination due to accusations that he made two unidentified women "uncomfortable" over what seems like, in one case, an innocent comment about the woman's height, and  for reasons unclears as yet, in the other case. This is incredibly ironic and if it weren't, would be comical.

If Cain happened to be a Democratic president, these charges would be laughed at, considered trivial, and not worthy of discussion. After all, look at the list of Bill Clinton's girlfriends and mistresses: Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Gina Gershon, Belinda Stronach, Julie Tauber McMahon, Naomi Robison, Maria Furtwangler, Elizabeth Hurley, Heidi Klum, Eleanor Mondale, Markie Post, Sharon Stone, Patricia Duff, Sally Purdue, Elizabeth Gracon, and Dolly Kyle Browning, just to name the ones we know about, according to Ranker.com and National Enquirer. It is only when the target is a conservative that charges of ethical misconduct grows legs. 

Socialist or Marxist? You decide

Republicans need to learn how to fight back and call out Democrats on their hypocrisy. We never seem to do that--we avoid it  to avoid looking petty. Maybe we need to become petty and call out the left--like Obama for saying he should be a one-term president for not improving the economy, for passing policies that have not worked, even though he complains about not being able to pass policies. The employment rate in this country is worse with the stimulus of Obama's, than it was before the stimulus. 

2008 White Voter Intimidation Squad 

But more importantly, was Obama ever vetted before he became president? Do we know his college grades? Who paid his Harvard tuition for him? Who his relationships were with prior to marrying Michele? What his college thesis was about? His relationships with Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, and the New Black Panthers? 


No--somehow the mainstream liberal media did not vet Obama at all. In fact, once he became the Democratic nominee, they blindly got behind him, and look what he has done to our country, and how he has treated our allies.

Tweet

Libya's Head--Shot Dead in the Head

Sort of like a death photo

Gaddafi is dead, a bullet to his head and photos of him are all over the news. I wonder why it is okay for the American press to show the gruesome photos of Gaddafi, but not Osama bin Laden. It makes me think that Obama took all the credit for bin Laden, but was worried the Islamists would have sought revenge for killing the scumbag, so he had to show respect for the "sensitivities" of the Islamic nation of insensitive terrorists. 

Gaddafi (CNN spells it as 'Gadhafi', but they also spell Obama as 'God' so choose the spelling you think is most accurate ) is another story. Obama was slow to do anything to help the rebels in their fight against the Libyan leader at the outset, and the credit should go to France and England for their swift reaction to the Libyan rebellion while Obama was playinng golf and Michele was flying to her African vacation.  As I write this, it is about 1:30 PM and Obama is scheduled to speak in the Rose Garden (Obama calls it his "Weed Garden") about Gaddafi in a half hour. I anticipate that he will manipulate reality and take credit--he isn't afraid of Libya, he's afraid of Islamists. 

Osama bin Hurtin'

As you probably know, in 1988, Gaddafi ordered the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 that killed Americans, 35 of them Syracuse University students, and many others over Lockerbie, Scotland. He was a very bad man. This dictator had been diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder, a disorder most easily diagnosed by clinicians when they feel animosity for their client and wonder why.  His disorder does not excuse him for what he had done and it is a good thing that he is dead. But Obama had nothing to do with it and his administration has allowed the death photos, even a video, to be aired today, but nothing at all on Osama. Perhaps it's because there is only a one letter difference to their names.


So my next paragraph will deal with the Obama speech. We are now only 5 minutes away from his brave new world words.

Done. The speech lasted about 6 minutes and did not mention France or England's role in their initial support, but gave credit to Americans. Obama called on Libyans to "secure their dangerous weapons," which has to do with those thousands of SAMs that were stolen, and he called for fair and free elections, and to treat their prisoners with compassion. He said that we did all this without having to put American boots on the ground, which I guess excuses him for not going to congress to request permission to do this. But had Obama made an earlier move, many more lives would have probably been saved.

You're next, GOP

Somehow I expect the Democrats make this a mighty victory for Obama, but that would be stretching the truth--a specialty of the liberals who don't need facts to make factual statements.

Wait!!! I just got word on Fox News that it was a US drone that hit the convoy and made Gaddafi flee into the sewer pipe where he was captured and later 'capped'. So Obama did it after all--I am so freaking surprised. I don't care if Obama is a socialist-Marxist corporatist or whatever. I don't care if he wants to be king of America for life. I am just so proud that my brave president had the audacity of hope to believe that we, as Americans, can defeat the forces of evil and endure.  Just kidding.

Jay Carney spoke at a press conference. His hair was neat and he wore a pastel purple tie, and a clean white shirt. He sounded tired and said nothing new or interesting--"Libya is in a far better place now," and yadda yadda yadda.

Tweet

6 Reason Why Liberals Suck

First of all, let me be very clear, not all liberals suck. There are unborn liberals, that is, liberals yet to be born, and to say they suck is unfair to the unborn. But the issue of the unborn is precisely one of the reasons liberals who have been born do suck.

1. Abortion: liberals will hold vigils through the night; they will march and chant, all to protest the death penalty and save the lives of murderers. They say all life is precious and to take a life, in spite of the fact that the sentenced has taken life, is wrong. But these very same liberals who would save the life of a murderer refuse to march and protest to save the lives of the unborn. Many liberals feel that it is a woman's right to choose whether or not the baby she is carrying should live or be killed; the baby has no right to be part of that decision, nor is a lawyer called forth to speak for the child because the law is on the liberal's side. Just because the law allows for abortion does not make it right; it simply makes it legal. If the life of a murderer is precious, and all life is precious, why doesn't the life of the unborn fall into the same category? Why does a woman have more rights than a baby? Since Roe v Wade there have been around 45 million babies put to death, in most instances because the baby was "inconvenient" or otherwise "unwanted." That isn't the baby's fault; it's the fault of the people engaged in creating the life. Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion. In fact, adopted children do better than children coming from single parent homes, and even better than many coming from two parent homes. If adoption were not a viable alternative, and abortion was the only way to go, you would not have the iPhone--Steve Jobs was adopted, and he did pretty well for himself.

6 Reasons Why Barack Hussein Obama CAIRS

You are probably aware of a Muslim organization known as CAIR--the Council on American-Islamic Relations. You may also be aware  that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trials that found the Muslim Brotherhood had funded terrorism across the globe, including right here in the USA. CAIR is their sister organization as are practically every Islamic organization in North America.

The Obama administration has had a love affair with Islam and organizations that exist in the name of extending Islam around the infidel world. You are probably aware that Obama, like GW Bush, has claimed Islam to be a religion of peace, and you might also know that when the opportunity arose again to indict CAIR, our Attorney General, Eric Holder, declined to pursue this indictment. 

What follows are some things about Obama's administration and CAIR that you may not know. 

On June 5, 2009 CAIR announced that it "Welcomes AG Holder's Statement on Muslim Civil Rights." 

"The President's pledge for a new beginning between the United States and the
Muslim community takes root here in the Justice Department where we are
committed to using criminal and civil rights laws to protect Muslim Americans.
A top priority of this Justice Department is a return to robust civil rights
enforcement and outreach in defending religious freedoms and other fundamental
rights of all of our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the housing market,
in our schools and in the voting booth.

"There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear - to pit our
national security against our civil liberties - but that is a false choice. We
have a solemn responsibility to protect our people while we also protect our
principles."

On the surface, this seems downright American--protecting the rights of our Muslim brothers and sisters, and making sure they have the religious freedoms they apparently deserve.  Our president has pledged a "new beginning," a term that bothers my sense of reasoning, but I know what he was trying to say. "We are sorry that we mistreated you--please forgive us as we forgive you for 9-11." Or something along those lines.

Let us look at what CAIR has been working on in our country since Muslims killed almost 3,000 innocent civilians in the name of their religion of peace.

The start of the Patriot Act

1. CAIR wants the Patriot Act to be repealed. The USA Patriot Act was instituted by G.W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in response to 9-11. The words are an acronym for: Uniting and Strengthening America (by) Providing Appropriate Tools Required (to) Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorism. The purpose of this act was to reduce limitations on law enforcement agencies' to search telephone, e-mail communications, financial data, and other records.  

Isn't it odd that an organization claiming to be supportive of the USA and its values want to repeal a presidential act that can protect us from our enemies who just happen to be the same religion as the members of CAIR?

2. CAIR actively lobbies for a weakening of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. In October of 1978, an Act of Congress (and signed by Pres. Jimmy Carter) passed an act which prescribes procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance as well as the collection of 'foreign intelligence information' between 'foreign powers' and 'agents of foreign powers' and may include American citizens and permanent residents suspected of espionage and violating US law.


Again, here we see how CAIR would like to stay 'under the radar' from American scrutiny. It should concern us all that we even entertain these ideas.


3. Outlawing anti-terrorist profiling by police. Why profile when we can check the shoes of children and wheelchair bound cancer patients for explosives? Israel has found that profiling, asking good questions, and keen observation has worked to make El Al the safest airline in the skies--and this is the airline the terrorists love to hate.


4. Abolish post-9/11 restrictions and quotas for Muslims from high-risk Islamic countries. CAIR would love to see more of its jihadists living in the United States, the new caliphate projected to go Muslim by 2050. That is their goal; we must stop this from happening. Look at London, Oslo, France, and the Netherlands.

Muslim fun

5. A speeding up of the process of background checks on Arab/Muslim immigration applicants. That should help get more questionable immigrants into the country. I think that would be good for the mattress companies because boy, there would sure be a lot of sleeper cells.


6. Purging FBI terrorist watchlists and 'no fly' lists. Why don't we just have the airlines hand out complimentary box cutters to all Middle East and Arabic-looking passengers to save time.


According to FEC records, Obama received a $1,000 campaign contribution from Jamal Barzinji. No, Jamal is not an NBA player, he is a Muslim Brotherhood leader and has been the subject of Federal terror money laundering investigations. Other Democrats, to their credit, returned the dirty money when they received campaign contributions from this scumbag, but Obama kept his donation.  On November 3, 2008, our new president received a small donation directly from CAIR for $250. Do you think this may have any bearing on the fact that Eric Holder refused to move forward to indict these people?


If anyone thinks Obama and his cronies are free from sin, they just might be in need of intervention. 

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet