Bernie counterpunches Debbie Downer

Bernie Sanders came down hard on Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic Party head, for "working against" him for "personal reasons" in the Democratic presidential campaign. Tensions between the socialist and the progressive left came to a head in a raucous weekend at the Nevada convention. 

Sanders' supporters threw chairs, shouted over speakers and harassed the state party chair with death threats, making the convention resemble an Occupy Wall Shhtreet movement or a liberal protest over a conservative speaker.

Democrats pressed Sanders to denounce the violence but he sounded as perfunctory as the Obama administration denouncing an extremist attack. In other words, the cute little old fart is a lot more dangerous than people would like to believe.

Sanders said that accusations that his campaign was propping up the violence "is an outrage and unacceptable." Obama said the same thing about the Paris attacks and the same results were had for both socialists. Nothing new, nothing to see here.

Jeff Weaver, Sanders' campaign manager said to MSNBC that "It's been pretty clear . . . almost from the get-go that [Schultz] has been working against Bernie Sanders. I mean there's no doubt about it, for personal reasons."

Weaver listed a load of complaints in charging 'Debbie Downer' with her negative behavior toward Bernie-It's-Free-Sanders, using the debate scheduling as an example. Debbie had debates scheduled on weekends, sometimes coinciding with big playoff games, and times when the only people who'd be watching the debates were the cameramen taping them and Chrissy Matthews and his leg.

Schultz is no stranger to Hillary-love and faced tons of criticism from her own leftists who claim she busted her butt boosting the felon's bid for the presidency. Of course, like Hillary, who denied having a private server, then admitted to it, Debbie W. Schultz denied the accusation of wanting to share a Chardonnay with her by a quiet fireplace in a cabin in the hills, like Huma do.

After the Nevada debacle, Debbie joined with other Democratic "leaders" in urging Sanders to take a stronger stand against the unrest in the party. Sanders said that he's "awlready taking a shhtrong stand," and sat down to demonstrate. 

Schultz is facing pressure for how she mishandled the Nevada situation. Communist commentator Van Jones told the Certainly Not News Network (CNN)  on Wednesday that he wishes RNC Chairman Reince Priebus was leading the Democrats, saying "He did a better job of handling the Trump situation that I've seen my party chair handle this situation."

Vladimir Putin did not comment on Jones' remark.

Sanders issued a statement about the Nevada event.

"Our campaign of course believes in non-violent change [revolution, revolt, uprising] and it goes without saying that I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals." Then he ranted about how the Democratic establishment is screwing him over.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (Duh-Calif.) was booed when she spoke at the convention and told the liberal media that she feared for her safety and plans to "carry" for self-protection. "But you can't," she said with a smirk. She said that Sanders should give a "major speech"calling on his socialist supporters to reject violence and opt for unity.

She had to stop mid-sentence when she got cut off by a unicorn being ridden by a spider monkey in a tuxedo.



Tweet

Occupy Bye Bye

Cleaning up body fluids & body waste of pigs

Occupy Wall Street is being evicted. They were told to leave Zuccotti Park and the NYPD is finally removing them.  An odiferous woman with oily hair commented: "All my friends are in there--this is my f***ing home," When asked to produce a legal deed for the property, she flipped the reporter "The Bird." The smell of feces and sewage is gone and now the park smells like disinfectant. Tonight, the protestors are allowed back into the park, but the police are checking them to ensure that they brought no sleeping equipment.

You can evict our bodies but not our message: "Um"

The protestors believe they have the right to "live" in Zuccotti Park. Some guy who looked like a Vietnam War protestor, spoke out on the news about how it was a victory that they were being allowed back into the park--a private park--and he said that he is willing to sit upright all night, since sleeping gear is no longer going to be permitted.  Mayor Michael Moneybags Bloomberg spoke about the Constitution and how it is clear that the protestors have no Constitutional rights to continue to be in the park. He said that it is unconstitutional.  It's as if the Constitution was written last week and Bloomberg is upholding it. What about when these idiots first arrived? What about the Constitution at that time? What about the Democruds and their take on the Constitution? Did it just now become valid? Lucy Billings, a judge who worked for the ACLU, told Bloomberg, the smellers could occupy the park as long as they want, but she was rightfully overruled by a higher court, and a judge with a brain.

In my mental travels along lower Manhattan, I was fortunate to run into my old buddy, Michael Mierda, who provided me with a live, albeit emitic interview:

Me: So, Mr. Mierda, the police have orders to ask you all to leave. How do you feel about that?
Mierda: Right now I'm not feeling nothin' but the freak. I got my freak on with some of the best s**t you can get here, man, and ain't nothin' gonna screw my freak.
Me: Are you saying you're high on drugs now?
Mierda: (begins singing "Rocket Man," by Elton John) An' I think it's gonna be a long, long time . . . yeah, man, you could say that I'm feelin' high.
Me: But you're going to have to go elsewhere tonight, Mr. Mierda. The park is being closed to the Occupy movement. What are you going to do? Where will you go?
Mierda: Dude, if I gotta sleep on Bloomberg's fu*kin' lawn tonight, so be it. Hey, ha ha, I never ever used 'so be it' man, that's cool. So be it.
Me: Mayor Bloomberg is saying that you'll be able to return to Zuccotti Park after it's cleaned up, but protestors aren't going to be allowed to have sleeping bags and tents there anymore. Where will you go?
Mierda: F**k, if it comes to that, man, we'll sleep sitting up, leaning against each other, like brothers and sisters, and our bodies will keep each other warm, man. You know what I'm sayin'?
Me: Once this protest is over, what will you do and where will you go?
Mierda: Easy, man. I'll go back to my old lady's basement and sell my foodstamps. I'll be cool. If I can get rid of my school loan, like the movement advocates, hey, that's another cool word, well, if I can dump the loan, then maybe I'll get a job. Don't want no job if I gotta pay back the loan, man.
Me: Thanks for your time, Mr. Mierda. It's always an adventure talking with you.
Mierda: I think I just crapped myself again, man.

Michael Moore's Lake House: where he goes when he laughs at the "99%"

Tweet

OWS Throwing Feces

Michael Moore is angry at the media for asking him questions about his wealth and how he sees himself as part of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Personally, I thought he was going to get his rotund butt kicked by a reporter who asked the question and who he verbally attacked, but all he did was huff and walk away pretending to be macho, but looking more bovine than a man on a mission.

Moore is becoming increasingly irrelevant and he loves this OWS movement because it gives him press.  But he's the most insincere person out there with his assets around $50 million. At least the anarchists know they are nihilists and hate everything. Some protestors, who aren't too drugged out, know they hate the cronyism of Wall Street, (although they haven't put it together where Obama is involved), but Moore pretends that he is "one of them." He says he wants to pay more in taxes and nobody is stopping him, but he only will pay more if others do the same.  If it's the right thingn to do, then why will he not do it even if others fail to do the right thing? Because he has no principals.

Juan Williams think the protestors want capitalism. He's wrong--they want handouts, and there is no doubt about that as they said so not in so many words.They also want LSD and other pharmaceuticals to further cloud their brains. 

The left is saying that only a few "nuts" are the problem there--with several thousand arrests, I think it's time to admit that the problem is larger than the left will admit, and that it's time to get out the water cannons and clean up the streets. I suggest water cannons as they will serve the dual purpose of pushing the protestors out of the area while cleaning them up somewhat. Seriously, this is anarchy in the making and the longer we allow it to continue, the more likely it will worsen to the point that Oakland is experiencing now. To deface property, small businesses, to use drugs openly, commit crimes such as rape, to be openly hostile and clearly anti-Semitic, is disgusting. And this all was brought on by Obama's use of class warfare.

Obama has gotten what he wants, and if you think this is presidential, well you might be an anarchist too.

Tweet

Occupy This

The occupiers are losing it. They are not playing well with others, especially the 53% of the nation who goes to work, pays their taxes, raises their family, and loves their country. No, these occupiers are as angry as a Greek mob on steroids, and quite frankly, if you see the videos of what's taking place in Oakland, you can't really tell the difference between the two countries.The video in today's blog was shot a week ago, but nothing much has changed except the air quality by the tents--it has worsened. I wonder if Nancy Pelosi still thinks these cute kids are speaking for her and her left-leaning, bailout providing, Arab Spring loving, racist party. I know they still speak for Michael Moore, but he's only anti-American in voice, not in spirit, because he would not have his $59 million in a non-capitalistic society if he wasn't a capitalist.  In fact, if he was in any other country and made documentaries aimed at making money by denouncing that country, he likely would not have a job, and more likely not even have his testicles on board. It is because of our freedom and Constitution that these cretins can protest and denounce the country, without being sent to a gulag when they do it. 



But those who remain in New York's Zuccotti Park, or Oakland, Detroit,Chicago, and all the other cities in America since this began, are not people with legitimate gripes, but people with anger, a propensity toward violence, drugs, casual public sex, and a soap deficit. These are the anarchists who want to see our freedoms end, but who are unwilling to move to a socialist or communists country where they can get what they claim to want. They are supposedly the 99 percenters, those who fall into a salary category below that elite one percent, but globally, they are the one percent whom they protest against. The global average salary is about 2 dollars a day--the OWS clowns average far above that because America is, per capita, one of the wealthiest nations in the world, although it is also true, that one in 15 of people in the US are living in abject poverty. I suspect none of these poor people can even afford a tent to pitch alongside the protestors. 


I believe Americans have the right to protest. I believe in the First Amendment, along with the rest of the Constitution, but I do not believe that sedition should be rewarded with praise like the left is giving to the Occupy movement. I believe it's time to bring out the water cannons and to round up the rabble, take names, and put those who have destroyed property or committed any criminal act, in jail. The rights to protest are one thing, but people who are affected adversely by these protestors also have rights. Small business has been adversely effected and nothing has been done to help them. It isn't fair--the protestors want their "fair share" of other people's money. That sounds like socialism or Marxism to me.

Marx: Stinky learns to count, but not to bathe

Isn't it ironic that Karl Marx bathed about as much as the occupiers have since stinking up the place?

Tweet

Occupy Wall Street is Tax Exempt:--Are We Stupid or What?

Since the Occupy Wall Street protestors squatted (in more ways than one) in Zuccotti Park on September 17th, similar protests have begun in about 70 major cities in the USA, and around 900 cities worldwide. The tactics used to organize these protests reminds me of the tactics used on 9-11, in a way. Here we have a group of protestors upset with corporations and big business, using their corporate gadgets to communicate and coordinate their protests. Isn't this similar to the Islamic terrorists, who hate the ways of the West, using our jet planes as weapons of death against us? 

But now the OWS movement (again, the word 'movement' can be taken in more than one way) has become a tax-exempt entity. These demonstrators have received over $500 thousand in donations, which are now being sponsored by Alliance for Global Justice, a far left organization. If you hurry, you can get a discount on their courses that boasts it will change "beginners into activists, activists into organizers, and to help seasoned organizers develop new skills and areas of expertise . . . " I figure these areas include bombmaking and becoming President of the United States of America, but I could be slightly wrong.

Comparing atrocities on their people

Chuck-I'd-French-kiss-Hugo-Chavez-Kaufman is the AFGJ's National Co-Coordinator wrote on the website: "The Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ) and its predecessor and founder, the Nicaragua Network, have been well-known grassroots organizations withinthe Central and Latin America solidarity movement and the anti-corporate globalization movement for over three decades. For probably 25 years we've used our 501(c)(3) non-profit tax status to fiscally sponsor projects that do not have their own tax-exempt status . . . " and the garbage gets deeper.

Chavez says Obama "smells like hope." He's half right

If you go to the afgi.org website you'll find articles such as: "A Sustainable Agriculture Delegation to Nicaragua"; "One Last Stand Against Free Trade"; and "We Know Free Trade Kills Jobs"; for starters. If you believe that these articles are not leftist propaganda with Communist undertones, you might be an Obama supporter.  Delve deeper into the writings of Kaufman and you will find his book review on Hugo Chavez that makes the man out to be a hero of South America. This is the idiot who is praising OWS along with George Soros, The View, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama. 


What concerns me is that OWS is likely to be less peaceful than the leaders of the left seem to believe. I tend to lean toward Glenn Beck's thinking that this is anarchistic and will get worse--we are simply seeing the first step in the movement. If Obama is re-elected next year, I believe we will see changes that will have our founding fathers doing the macarina in their graves.
 

Tweet

OWS Goes Viral and Fungal, Plus More Random Thoughts

A fungus among us

Occupy Everything has become a fungal problem. The media talks about crony capitalism as the driving force of OWS, but that's a mistake--it's an oxymoron to put the two terms together. Cronyism is the problem, capitalism is not. Capitalism is the system where goods and services are provided for more money than it takes to provide them; it's that simple. Cronyism, like Obamaism, is when a system that is in place is abused--in the former, it's capitalism being abused, in the latter, it's the presidency.

Do you know what hypocrisy looks like?

People who protest capitalism are losers. Worse, they are spoiled losers because they are used to being handed things by mommy and daddy and are not used to actually going out and working for "stuff." They have iphones, computers, Kindles, maybe even student loans, and a place to live--often at their parents' home, but they never actually went out to work themselves to pay for their "stuff." They are not willing to hunt the food they eat--they expect to be able to shop for it (more likely have their benefactor parent shop for it) and cook it for them in a mass produced oven or microwave oven. Everything they own or eat is obtained by them through the vehicle of capitalism. Yet they condemn the system that feeds, clothes, and entertains them. They protest at Rupert Murdock's home but not George Soros, the leftist, anarchist, anti-American atheist who has bet against the American economy at the expense of it.

Ms. Amerika

This only goes to show what idiots the OWSers are--but if you're reading this, you likely already are aware of that fun fact.


The big question is, will the fact that the Democrats are supporting and kissing up to the OWS full metal jackasses, hurt them or help them come 2012? I believe it depends on how many confused liberals will vote. (I know that confused liberals is an oxymoron, but I had to say it.)

Obama said that he wanted to bring the country together, not split us apart. He seems to often do the opposite of what he says. Just a few days ago, he praised a judge's approval of a $1.2 billion settlement for black farmers brought by a judgment against the USDA, which he called "another important step forward in addressing the unfortunate chapter in the USDA's civil rights history." This call to color awareness is common with Democrats as they so frequently use the race card with Republicans. But Democrats never admit anything about their racial issues when it makes the media. When Shirley Sherrod made the news (Fox News, that is), with her racially motivated statements about a white farmer, this tidbit was glossed over by Democrats. You may remember her words, but I posted the video here to refresh your memory, in case you forgot what she said. Racism is an ugly thing that goes both ways, and Obama and his administration, exploits it to the max.


Since Abraham Lincoln first began the USDA, which he called the "people's department," it has had a strong Democratic leadership, especially of late. Dan Glickman, a Democrat, headed the agency under Bill Clinton's administration.  In 1997 a class action lawsuit was filed by Timothy Pigford, a black farmer, for discriminatory practices. So if Obama is going to speak to racial discrimination, he ought to speak about his party, the party responsible. That isn't to say Republicans are blameless, but certainly in these cases, the Civil War, and most others, they are.  But Obama would never want to split Americans apart by party, so I suspect he just forgot to mention that little piece of information.

I heard that Herman Cain has come back in support of his 9-9-9 plan. I think he's right to defend it as such. To tweak is weak, I always say. Well, okay, not always, but in this case I believe he needs to stand by his idea, even if it isn't exactly the numbers that will work--the public doesn't want a wishy-washy flip-flopper--we have one already. I also like that Cain stood behind Martin Block, his campaign manager, who took a drag from a cigarette at the end of an ad for Cain. Obama might have thrown the guy under the proverbial bus, as they say, but Cain simply said that it was "Martin being Martin." The guy has character.

I strongly believe that whoever wins the Republican nomination should be supported by all of us who want to get the country back on track. Socialism is not working, in spite of what our fustian leader says, and splitting us apart as a nation is not going to make our country better. 

Tweet

Toilet Trees at the Wall Street Flea Market

Ironically, a Jewish man has the flag concession

Not your father's beauty contest

We are a nation that respects the right of dissention and individual freedom. But what about the freedom of those who choose not to dissent, those who just want to be left alone? Do people who live near the demonstrations have the right to live in a neighborhood where there is peace and quiet--where they can come home after a day's work and have a little quiet time and simply kick back and relax?


It is one thing to allow for demonstrations, and totally another to allow those demonstrations to interfere with the rights of others. I believe the time has come when the law needs to step in and send the demons-traitors back home to their parents where they can continue the practice of whining and sponging off of them. The occupy movement has become like a huge occupied toilet. Zuccotti Park is overflowing with toilet trees, the odor of unwashed socialists, communists, Islamists, Nazis, and other forms of anti-Semites, nihilists and assorted people whose life only has meaning when they are angry about something, even if they're uncertain about what it is exactly, and how to express it in words.

Islamic call for peace and death to Israel

They spent all their tuition on courses in Peruvian Underwater Jewelry Stringing, and Capitalist Anger Studies. It's time to round them up and send them packing. If George Soros and all the rest of the OWS cronies don't like it, let 'em protest--they already have a foot up on the protestors--they stank before it started.

Tweet

6 Reason Why Liberals Suck

First of all, let me be very clear, not all liberals suck. There are unborn liberals, that is, liberals yet to be born, and to say they suck is unfair to the unborn. But the issue of the unborn is precisely one of the reasons liberals who have been born do suck.

1. Abortion: liberals will hold vigils through the night; they will march and chant, all to protest the death penalty and save the lives of murderers. They say all life is precious and to take a life, in spite of the fact that the sentenced has taken life, is wrong. But these very same liberals who would save the life of a murderer refuse to march and protest to save the lives of the unborn. Many liberals feel that it is a woman's right to choose whether or not the baby she is carrying should live or be killed; the baby has no right to be part of that decision, nor is a lawyer called forth to speak for the child because the law is on the liberal's side. Just because the law allows for abortion does not make it right; it simply makes it legal. If the life of a murderer is precious, and all life is precious, why doesn't the life of the unborn fall into the same category? Why does a woman have more rights than a baby? Since Roe v Wade there have been around 45 million babies put to death, in most instances because the baby was "inconvenient" or otherwise "unwanted." That isn't the baby's fault; it's the fault of the people engaged in creating the life. Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion. In fact, adopted children do better than children coming from single parent homes, and even better than many coming from two parent homes. If adoption were not a viable alternative, and abortion was the only way to go, you would not have the iPhone--Steve Jobs was adopted, and he did pretty well for himself.

Iran is our Biggest Threat, Obama is our Biggest Loser

After seeing our response to Iran's plot to kill the Saudi Ambassador in Washington DC, how should we classify our president? Is he a tabby or a siamese? A calico or a balinese? What kind of pussycat is he? Personally, I go for American shorthair.

Not his bar mitzvah photo

We are quick to deploy troops to Uganda. Fast to send drones to Afghanistan. But the real threat in the world today is Iran. When they finally develop a nuclear weapon, it will only be a matter of time before they use it, first against Israel, then against us.  It's kind of an Islamic mafia thing--it isn't so much that they're angry at us, it's just business--Islamic business. They are commanded by Allah (who is really Muhammad without the drag) to destroy the infidel, the nonbelievers, and particularly the Jews. This has been going on for fourteen hundred years, and it doesn't seem like it's going to stop until the whole world is saying Allahu Akbar with butts to heaven and heads toward hell.

Obama has claimed that one of the reasons we are sending troops into Uganda is for security purposes. I find that a hard stretch--what will the Ugandese do to our national security--threaten us with intercontinental ballistic blow guns?  Lord's Resistance Army doesn't seem to pose the same kind of threat that Iran poses. There is more of a threat from the unwashed hoardes on Occupy Wall Street than there is coming from Uganda, and Obama actually supports the latter socialist movement because, well, he's a socialist.  George Soros is even more dangerous than Uganda.  Actually, Soros is more dangerous than most nations when you think about it.


So let us keep a sharp watch on Iran--they are like the proverbial banana peel and we are the unsuspecting peripatetic oblivious. We cannot afford to slip up where they`re concerned.


And let`s see if we can get Occupy Wall Street to shower. No justice, no soap.

Tweet

Occupy Wall Street Smells Fishy

Honk if someone else caused your debt

Nancy Pelosi continues to compare the unwashed mobs of Occupy Wall Street and other cities of our country to the Tea Party. So let's look at the differences and similarities, if they exist, and you decide if they're similar.

Tea Party rallies broke no laws and did no damage to the scenes where they gather. Occupy Wall Street has stolen from local merchants, ruined washrooms, and are in the process of making a mess of the sidewalks of the cities where they are camping out.
Tea Party has a clear message--limit the size of government, reduce spending, and get rid of wasteful entitlements
Occupy Wall Street has confused messages that are incoherent at best. They want their own debts, like college loans, to be forgiven. They want to get rid of big business. Make the rich pay their "fair share" of the taxes, which, if they did, may actually pay less than they currently pay, and cause the 47% of those who pay zero taxes, to pay their fair share, if you get technical about it.
Tea Party loves America and holds our Constitution in the highest regard--so high, in fact, that they resent the way our current president has practically disregarded it. They do not believe in the Obama czars who are not being held accountable by congressional oversight, and they do not believe in policies like the Dream Act where illegal immigrants get a better fiscal deal than legal immigrants and even American-born citizens.
Occupy Wall Street has Democratic approval because the dems know these protestors are too dense to realize that the current administration has made the country's debt and fiscal crisis much worse and hope to gain more sympathy from socialist/Marxist voters. Obama refuses to condemn them and has said that the demonstrators express "the furstrations that the American people feel." He pretends they are feeling frustration due to something other than his failed policies, regulations, and insane spending. He is hoping to also fool the other Americans who actually take showers.
Tea Party had the media treat them as "crazies," "fringe," "racists," and "mobs." But now Nancy Pelosi is comparing the Occupy Wall Street mob to the Tea Party, but not in a negative way. She is trying to elevate the unwashed (literally) mob as a movement with a real message. At this time, it isn't very clear what their message is.
Occupy Wall Street has are the darlings of the media, in part, because of organizations like MoveOn.org and labor unions. George Soros is behind some of the positive publicity too.


How many of these protestors have jobs? How many sincerely want jobs? How many get government subsidies? It's significant that they can protest for so many days and not have a job to go to--the Tea Party people mostly have jobs. They didn't protest for weeks at a time because they had to go to work. They don't have the luxury of these protestors whose mommies and daddies pay their way.

These idiots believe there should be salary caps on professions. For example, doctors should only make $28 thousand per year; this is idiotic. They believe that people who have worked hard for their wealth should share it with them. They do not believe in the free market but they believe things should be free for them, like education, health care, and maybe even food.             

Obama will try to use Occupy Wall Street to his advantage. As Saul Alinsky said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste." He and the Democratic party are aligning with this movement because it camoflages the reasons they are angry in the first place. This do nothing president is, if anything, crafty and sneaky. He is the most devisive president this country has ever known and he will continue to divide us because he cannot run on his record--he never did in the first place because he had no record to run on.

Something smells on Wall Street and in Washington DC.
Tweet

Wall Street es Occupado

Michael Mierda prior to interview

Well, they're still out there, just a marchin' and a blowin' in the wind. Kumbayah. Who are these young people who want their student loans paid off  and other free stuff? Let's find out.
  
In an interview with 24 year old Michael Mierda, I had the chance to ask some pointed questions. His answers should illuminate any questions you might have had about the commitment and intelligence of these rabid protestors.

Me: Can you tell me what you and the other protestors are out here to protest? 


Mierda: Like the beginning is near, man. We are everywhere throughout the nation. I was like, you know, forget about it. The system's gotta go. My freakin' college loan's gotta go. Close the banks, stop the wars, give us jobs, man. Capitalism sucks and it's time to tax the millionaires and billionaires, and maybe even some of the thousandaires. Share the wealth, man.


Me: Are you currently working?


Mierda: Me work? No way, man. Like I'm not gonna work for a bunch of corrupt fat cats. If I work, I'll be payin' more in taxes than they do. It isn't fair, man. 


Me: Actually, the rich pay significantly more taxes than the poor. The top one percent pay ten percent of the taxes, and the top ten percent, pay something like forty percent of the taxes. Where did you learn that you would have to pay more in taxes than the rich?


Mierda: What are you, some kinda tea party dude? Everyone knows it's true. The guy handing out this newspaper said so, and that's good enough for me. There are no good jobs either, man. Like what's Wall Street doin' about that?

Surprised? Check out their rooms

Me: Well, I'm not sure Wall Street has anything to do with that problem, but do you see any connection to the jobs problem and President Obama and his fiscal policies?

Mierda: It's like the power brokers, man. They're the ones with the power and the money and they're makin' us all go broke--maybe that's why they're called power brokers (he then laughs so hard a bubble of mucous emerges from his left nostril). You know, man, this is a revolution. Occupy Wall Street began on September 17th and we're like goin' strong, man. We are like those Tahrir Square guys and stuff, and we will put an end to corruption and capitalism. We are, like, you know, gonna take back this country, man.


Me: How are you going to take it back?


Mierda: We're workin' on that, man. We'll have it all figured out and when we do, we're all gonna be the same and equal.


At that point, his mucous bubble burst, and so did the bubble of my belief that these people actually had a clue as to why they were here. I came to realize that what they were really protesting was the success of their parents.

Moore and date at Capitalism Party-really man

I guess you could sum up what is going on with the Occupy Wall Street movement in one word: hypocrisy. There are celebrities, like Michael-Pass-the-Ketchup-Moore, who have made their fortunes through our  good old capitalist system. But Moore is more despicable than most because denouncing capitalism is precisely how he made his fortune. He reminds me of the '60's folk singers whose songs about poverty, war, and the system, is what made many of them wealthy-- Bob Dylan and Joan Baez come to mind. So the only thing besides anarchy that I can tell is blowin' in the wind, is the sour odor wafting along Wall Street and a silent message: take a shower, people.

Guess what the "S" stands for

Michael Moore and the rest of the leftists parasites who make their money from people like these protestors (and then jump on their anti-capitalist bandwagons pretending to actually care about their plight), will go on to feed off the meager earnings of these liberal robots--which brings to mind the words of an old folk song Where Have All the Flowers Gone "When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn?"




Tweet