OWS Goes Viral and Fungal, Plus More Random Thoughts

A fungus among us

Occupy Everything has become a fungal problem. The media talks about crony capitalism as the driving force of OWS, but that's a mistake--it's an oxymoron to put the two terms together. Cronyism is the problem, capitalism is not. Capitalism is the system where goods and services are provided for more money than it takes to provide them; it's that simple. Cronyism, like Obamaism, is when a system that is in place is abused--in the former, it's capitalism being abused, in the latter, it's the presidency.

Do you know what hypocrisy looks like?

People who protest capitalism are losers. Worse, they are spoiled losers because they are used to being handed things by mommy and daddy and are not used to actually going out and working for "stuff." They have iphones, computers, Kindles, maybe even student loans, and a place to live--often at their parents' home, but they never actually went out to work themselves to pay for their "stuff." They are not willing to hunt the food they eat--they expect to be able to shop for it (more likely have their benefactor parent shop for it) and cook it for them in a mass produced oven or microwave oven. Everything they own or eat is obtained by them through the vehicle of capitalism. Yet they condemn the system that feeds, clothes, and entertains them. They protest at Rupert Murdock's home but not George Soros, the leftist, anarchist, anti-American atheist who has bet against the American economy at the expense of it.

Ms. Amerika

This only goes to show what idiots the OWSers are--but if you're reading this, you likely already are aware of that fun fact.


The big question is, will the fact that the Democrats are supporting and kissing up to the OWS full metal jackasses, hurt them or help them come 2012? I believe it depends on how many confused liberals will vote. (I know that confused liberals is an oxymoron, but I had to say it.)

Obama said that he wanted to bring the country together, not split us apart. He seems to often do the opposite of what he says. Just a few days ago, he praised a judge's approval of a $1.2 billion settlement for black farmers brought by a judgment against the USDA, which he called "another important step forward in addressing the unfortunate chapter in the USDA's civil rights history." This call to color awareness is common with Democrats as they so frequently use the race card with Republicans. But Democrats never admit anything about their racial issues when it makes the media. When Shirley Sherrod made the news (Fox News, that is), with her racially motivated statements about a white farmer, this tidbit was glossed over by Democrats. You may remember her words, but I posted the video here to refresh your memory, in case you forgot what she said. Racism is an ugly thing that goes both ways, and Obama and his administration, exploits it to the max.


Since Abraham Lincoln first began the USDA, which he called the "people's department," it has had a strong Democratic leadership, especially of late. Dan Glickman, a Democrat, headed the agency under Bill Clinton's administration.  In 1997 a class action lawsuit was filed by Timothy Pigford, a black farmer, for discriminatory practices. So if Obama is going to speak to racial discrimination, he ought to speak about his party, the party responsible. That isn't to say Republicans are blameless, but certainly in these cases, the Civil War, and most others, they are.  But Obama would never want to split Americans apart by party, so I suspect he just forgot to mention that little piece of information.

I heard that Herman Cain has come back in support of his 9-9-9 plan. I think he's right to defend it as such. To tweak is weak, I always say. Well, okay, not always, but in this case I believe he needs to stand by his idea, even if it isn't exactly the numbers that will work--the public doesn't want a wishy-washy flip-flopper--we have one already. I also like that Cain stood behind Martin Block, his campaign manager, who took a drag from a cigarette at the end of an ad for Cain. Obama might have thrown the guy under the proverbial bus, as they say, but Cain simply said that it was "Martin being Martin." The guy has character.

I strongly believe that whoever wins the Republican nomination should be supported by all of us who want to get the country back on track. Socialism is not working, in spite of what our fustian leader says, and splitting us apart as a nation is not going to make our country better. 

Tweet

Biden's Frightening Rape Predictions

Don't forget to mention rape

 Joe Biden, our eloquent Vice President, said that if Republican lawmakers refuse to pass that part of the Obama jobs bill that allocates more money for cops on the street, there will be more rapes and more people killed because of them. This is, of course, true, for as we all know, whenever a woman is in danger of being raped, a policeman will be close by to fend off the rapist, even though most rapes occur in the privacy of an indoor location, or areas where rapists know are secluded and free of police.

"Debbie Downer" Schultz and NOW Yelling

In response to this piece of Biden wisdom, Republicans called on women's groups and the media, to condemn this blatant idiocy, forgetting that the media might as well be Obama's press committee, and women's organizations, like NOW, besides being totally leftist, have done nothing to actually help women who really need their help. Islamic countries come to mind when thinking of NOW--countries like Saudi Arabia, where women don't have the right to drive, or wear clothing that doesn't make them look like they're walking around in a cloth coffin, or have the same legal rights as their male counterparts. Women, under sharia law (or Islamic law), can be beaten by their husband, and are often "honor-killed" for many reasons, which disgust me to enumerate.

The RNC responded to Biden's campaigning by saying: "No victim of violent crime would ever wish that others were forced to experience the same trauma they went through--especially to make a brazen point. So why would the sitting Vice President of the United States?" Beyond the fact that Biden is an idiot, the answer to that question should be obvious--he wants the bill passed, and he wants Obama to rule the USA for 4 more years.

"His brain? About so big."

Jay Carney, the White House press secretery said, "It would be hard to find anyone who doesn't agree with the simple equation that fewer police officers on the street has a direct effect on the crime rate."

Well, let me be the first--or at least be one of the many--who does not agree with Carney. It was found that even when $19 billion was added to the anti-crime budget to fight rape, it did not decrease, but actually increased significantly. Demographics can be misleading--we need to consider the changes of the number of cops on the street versus those flying a desk. In 2010, the FBI found the crime rates were down sharply, with murders down 4.2% from the prior year; rape down 5%, amd robberies down 10% compared to 2009.  These rates came down at the same time when massive budget cuts were made, showing the lack of relationship of money thrown at the problem versus other tactics employed.


Speaking of other tactics, why do we need the jobs bill to dictate where this money must come from? We can easily cut those porky programs like the Department of Education--a total waste that has produced no positive results since its inception. We can stop the corporation favoritism that Obama has shown to money-pitfailures like Solyndra, and use that money to put more cops on the beat. But let's not pretend that this will lower crimes like rape. Core conservative values, rather than liberal secular values, will lower the crime rates, because morals and honest hard work are more valued and respected by conservatives. 

 
Joe Biden can say what he wants to liberals because facts are not as important as feelings--and it feels right to say that since Republicans will not support that part of a jobs bill calling for more funding of "cops on the street" it must mean Republicans want women to be raped, and crimes to be committed. But when you look at the party differences in an honest way, it's the conservative Republicans who want our laws and Constitution taken seriously, not the liberal Democrats. The differences are clear and the lines have been drawn. Liberty and freedom versus a nanny state that will clean up the garbage behind the unwashed, confused, and agry brats who occupy too much time and recognition.

Tweet

Something Smells Fishy

A Democrat

Solyndra, Fast and Furious, and the testimony of AF General William Shelton who said the White House pressured him to change his testimony regarding Lightsquared, a communications company whose CEO was a heavy contributer to Obama's campaign, has brought questions about this administration's honesty. The proposed jobs bill and economic stimulus attempts by Obama bring more questions about our president's ability not only to run the country, but to even run a small company. But his shady relationships with people within these companies leads one to question our president's honesty. Gee, it would  have been nice if he was vetted before he being nominated by his party.

Barry has dreams of a world where the air is clean, the grass grows green, and there is total equality among men--so much equality, that the rich will no longer have more than those who have never worked a day in their lives. Cars will run on electricity, homes, for those who still have one, will be heated by something other than coal or oil, (maybe sunlight on sunny days, and wind power on windy days, moon power at night), and our great nation will remain as great as other nations like Greece and Italy, Spain and Saudi Arabia, where Islam, the religion of peace, is the rule of the day. 

And there will be those people who will vote for him in 2012 because they have always voted Democrat (ends in 'rat'), never Republican (ends in 'can') in their lives. They do not follow politics because they don't have the time or interest and believe it doesn't effect their lives. These people, of course, have very little going on between their ears.

Then there will be those who believe the Democratic party is morally superior to the Repubican party. They don't really know the history of both parties and how Lincoln, the first Republican, was elected to put an end to slavery. These same people who think they're better than Republicans morally, do not have a clue that it was the Democrats begat the Jim Crow laws. They don't know much about Dixiecrats and their racist beliefs, and their social club called the KKK. They even believe that Martin Luther King Jr. was a Democrat--he was a Republican. 

The reality is, the White House is having problems because incompetency breeds concomitant problems. When a community organizer/associate professor who has never had the experience of actually holding a job in the free market but has made his living in academia, is elected president of the United States, and is arrogant enough to discount the advice he has been given by his "experts," we have blatant incompetence. But he sounds good. He gives good word. He convinces young people that his dream of a "better America" is their dream--as if the America that his wife had not been proud of, for the first time in her adult life, was a bad country. 

Tweet

Obama Kicks off NFL Opening Day with a Speech

Freaking Irene

I suspect Obama never has to use bathroom freshener after he does, as they say in India, a "big job" in the little boy's room. That's because his s**t is weak--an old Marine Corps saying referring to people who are passive, weak, timid, shy, and pussies, a word which may be another Marine Corps term. By the way, Obama pronounces Corps with the "s" as he did in a speech about Navy Corpsemen, whatever they are. He may be erudite and loquatious, but he's not the brightest bomb on the suicide vest.


But worse than being timid and shy, and leading with his behind, he is incredibly arrogant--perhaps that is because he believes, as I said above, that his s**t doesn't stink--he thinks that he is better than the rest of us plain folk. He is arrogant to think that the American public has the luxury to wait for him to get his lazy ass back from the greens to grace us with his wisdom about how he plans to get jobs for Americans. Hurricane Irene, unfortunately for him, cut his vacation in Martha's Vineyard short by five hours and still he had the audacity to hope we would tolerate his doing his version of a big job on us. Then he had the brilliant idea to announce today that he would make his illuminating speech on the same day and time as the GOP presidential debates, and I am happy to report that John Boehner called him on it and told him that he should make other plans. Of course, Jay Carney, his bespeckled and highly arrogant Press Secretary who Obama found on Angie's List with a B rating, said that it was a mere coincidence that the president's busy scheduling conflicted with the debate, but I finally believe the American public has had enough of this crap, which is why Boehner said no go to Obama's show.

In his presidential wisdom, Obama agreed to speak on Thursday and another coincidence was revealed: it's opening day for the NFL and the competition is going to be fierce--not between the teams, but between Obama and the game. What a crew of idiots he must have to miss this little detail. Maybe Carney was telling the truth about the original plans for the Wednesday confilct--nah, he's an ivy leaguer--the only mistake he made was to be a libtard and be on Obama's staff. At least that's the only mistake we know about the guy. Holder, well that's another story.



So what are you gonna do--watch Obama make another campaign speech where he blames the lack of bipartisanship, (read Republicans) for our country's woes, and tell how he inherited this problem from Bush, and yadda yadda? Or are you going to watch the Packers kick butt?

I know what I'm going to be doing Thursday-I can always watch Obama re-runs on the PajamasTV.


Comments? Don't be shy or timid--it doesn't become you.


 

Tweet

Joe Biden: It Takes a Village Idiot

Go ahead, pull my finger

 When Hillary Clinton visited Africa during her husband's administration, her famous, albeit falsely attributed, African saying was "it takes a village." After the 2008 campaign for president, which she lost to the then junior senator Obama, she owed over $20 million for her campaign debt. President-elect, Obama picked up the tab for this debt, and for this gesture of "no hard feelings," Hillary owes him big time.


Obama knowing how popular Hillary was to the liberal women's vote, wanted her aboard, and he appointed her Secretary of State. Historically, this was a position of high importance and enormous public exposure, but for Hillary Clinton, it seemed more like a position of Obama's Secretary, than it was Secretary of State, and the only thing missing from this picture was Hillary holding a steno pad.


So instead of Hillary gaining political exposure, it was Vice President Joe Biden who has been the stand-up guy for Obama; and Obama couldn't have chosen from "the village," a better village idiot to make him look like a genius in comparison.

One, two, seven, fifteen . . .

 First of all, Biden cannot count beyond two. Here's an example: "Look, John's last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number-one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs." Joe Biden, Athens, OH, Oct. 15, 2008. His math also came into question in February 2009 when he spoke to members of the House Democratic caucus in Williamsburg, VA. "If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, there's still a 30% chance we're going to get it wrong." I did not vote for this man.


Just before the brilliant J-O-B-S remark, Biden was interviewed by Katie Couric in September. In speaking about the economy Biden is quoted: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'" Well of course Roosevelt didn't do that since the market crashed in 1929 and when he was president there was no public television as it was still in the experimental phase. And of course, Roosevelt wasn't even president when the market crashed, but that's just one of those facts liberals don't bother checking.


Of course we all remember it when he asked Sen. Chuck Graham to "Stand up, Chuck, let 'em see ya," not realizing that the senator is confined to a wheelchair.  It would be a lot to ask such a busy Vice President to do a little research before engaging his mouth.


When Obama was at the health care signing ceremony in March of 2010, Biden never bothered checking to see if his mike was on when he congratulated Obama: "This is a big fucking deal!" he said for all the world to hear. Just shows his street smarts too, eh, because this is not the first time this has happened to our village idiot. He was speaking to a former Senate colleague after arriving at D.C.'s Union Station in March, 2009, when he said, "An hour late, oh give me a fucking break." Now there's a guy you could have a beer with, and hey, maybe cut a few beer farts for old times sake.


But my favorite statement is the one that shows Biden's true colors on those people of color when he said, "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man." So we have to assume that Joe Biden sees African-Americans as inarticulate, dull, dirty and ugly, and Obama breaks the mold. Very interesting, because the Democrats say it is Republicans who are racists, not them, in spite of their causing the Civil War, segregation, and Jim Crow laws. If Biden is an example of Obama's judgment in choosing a VP, maybe it's time for both of them to go--and that doesn't mean I'm racist.

Mine's this big

Since the village idiot's visit to China in which he refused to voice any concern over their one child policy, a law which is the catalyst for female genocide and forced abortion, the administration is going crazy trying to undo the damage the idiot has done. Specifically, when taking questions at Sichuan University, Biden launched into his Bidenisms about China's demographic crisis. "Your policy is one which I fully understand--I'm not second-guessing--of [allowing only] one child per family. . ."  Now spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff issued a statement stating that "the Obama administration strongly opposes all aspects of China's birth-limitation policies."  My question is this: did anyone in the administration know what those policies were before the idiot went there, and if they did, was he not prepped about what to say in its regard? I imagine they knew what they were, and that Biden was told not to make any waves.


Ah, America--what have they done to you?

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet