First of all, let me be very clear, not all liberals suck. There are unborn liberals, that is, liberals yet to be born, and to say they suck is unfair to the unborn. But the issue of the unborn is precisely one of the reasons liberals who have been born do suck.
1. Abortion: liberals will hold vigils through the night; they will march and chant, all to protest the death penalty and save the lives of murderers. They say all life is precious and to take a life, in spite of the fact that the sentenced has taken life, is wrong. But these very same liberals who would save the life of a murderer refuse to march and protest to save the lives of the unborn. Many liberals feel that it is a woman's right to choose whether or not the baby she is carrying should live or be killed; the baby has no right to be part of that decision, nor is a lawyer called forth to speak for the child because the law is on the liberal's side. Just because the law allows for abortion does not make it right; it simply makes it legal. If the life of a murderer is precious, and all life is precious, why doesn't the life of the unborn fall into the same category? Why does a woman have more rights than a baby? Since Roe v Wade there have been around 45 million babies put to death, in most instances because the baby was "inconvenient" or otherwise "unwanted." That isn't the baby's fault; it's the fault of the people engaged in creating the life. Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion. In fact, adopted children do better than children coming from single parent homes, and even better than many coming from two parent homes. If adoption were not a viable alternative, and abortion was the only way to go, you would not have the iPhone--Steve Jobs was adopted, and he did pretty well for himself.
Posts
