MSNBC's Maddow has numbers lower than a sunken ship's head

The numbers tell the story--Rachel Maddow the MSNBC prime time anchor has viewership ratings lower than sunken ship heads. [Look up the meaning of a ship's head for more information on the analogy given.] And she is maintaining a trend in which her numbers continue to plummet every month this year.

Maddow’s show has dedicated years and viewer time to intensive coverage surrounding the Mueller investigation. She averaged 2,608,000 viewers per night with 410,000 in the key 25-54 age demographic in May, according to Nielsen Media Research. That's about the same number of New Delhi riders on the roofs of buses in their morning commute.

Maddow's show came in third for cable news behind Fox News prime time hosts Sean "Thirty Million On Food Stamps" Hannity and Tucker Carlson. 

Hannity’s average audience was 3,138,000, with Carlson’s coming in at 2,761,000. The Five and The Ingraham Angle rounded out the top five.

The supercilious silly Maddow hit her peak in January this year, averaging 3.3 million viewers. Then in February, that number dipped to 3.1 million and again to 2.9 million in March. 

Her March coverage included the beginning to the end of the Mueller probe, when his office submitted his report to Attorney General William Barr and the investigation went public. 

Maddow’s numbers continued to circle the bowl. 

In April, her show averaged an audience of 2,630,000 people when Barr released a full and mandatory redacted version of the Mueller report revealing that there was no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russian officials to win the 2016 presidential election.

Now she's pushing for the Democrats to poop or get off the pot with impeachment. Why not? It doesn't affect her and could only help her anemic numbers. 

But of course, Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi knows that impeaching a sitting President is political suicide and she has a lot more to lose than Maddow.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and don't be shy about visiting the ads on these pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

Will Hannity be blowing the lid off Mueller report

The following is satire.

Sean Hannity asks the tough questions, especially those related to the Mueller probe. On his Fox News show, where he promises never to be a Trump basher and always be kind to our president, he spoke about the Mueller report and how it's becoming increasingly clear that people "up at the top" are likely involved with going after the president.

"Here's a question I'd pose to you, James Comey, if you had the guts to come on my show: How did you know that you knew what you knew and when did you know that you knew it?" he asked of the former FBI director who was unceremoniously fired by President Trump.

Comey didn't respond to Hannity's question but merely replied to George Stephanopoulos on his show: "I knew what I knew when they said what they said when the dossier was given to me."

Hannity promises us, the American public, that there's going to be a lot more to follow and it's going to be BIG. So BIG that it's going to blow the lid off the FBI and its corrupt leadership, according to investigative reporters John Solomon and Sarah Carter.

Meanwhile, there are still 30 million people on food stamps, and women still have half the rights of men in Saudi Arabia.

More to follow . . . or not.


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.





Tweet

Federal judge orders portions of Mueller report unredacted & made public

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan has ordered portions of the special counsel Robert Mueller’s report to be unredacted and made public in the criminal case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Sullivan issued the limited order on Thursday and it pertains to portions of the report relating to Flynn are redacted and would be made public under the order.

This is the first time a federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to make public portions of a report the agency had kept secret.

After almost two years, Mueller  finally concluded his investigation in March. Attorney General William P. Barr released a redacted version of Mueller’s report in April but the Democrats want the report to be totally unredacted, which is against the law. Several members of the House Judicial Committee, led by Jerry "Eyebrows" Nadler, want the report fully unredacted but that is not going to happen and is just a distraction by his party.

Gen. Flynn is awaiting sentence after admitting to lying to the FBI about his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States.

Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

BREAKING: Deputy AG [and Wally Cox lookalike] Rod Rosenstein resigns

Known for his pencil-neck like look and eerie resemblance to the late Wally Cox, Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein submitted his resignation to President Trump Monday, effective May 11th.

Attorney General William Barr in a statement said that Rosenstein served the Justice Department "with dedication and distinction." Trump may have disagreed, but he has not as yet tweeted about it.

"His devotion to the Department and its professionals is unparalleled," the statement read. "Over the course of his distinguished government career, he has navigated many challenging situations with strength, grace, and good humor."

Rosenstein previously served as deputy assistant attorney general and U.S. attorney.

Wally Cox

In February, Fox News reported that Barr picked Jeffrey Rosen, who currently serves as Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, to take over for Rosenstein should he leave office.

A source told Fox News in March that Rosenstein had reached an agreement with Barr to stay at the DOJ "a little while longer" after it was reported he planned to leave by mid-March.

The deputy resigned following the conclusion of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into the Trump administration and alleged involvement in Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election which was lost by Hillary Clinton and she can't get over it to this day.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

'Adam Stepped In' Schiff doubles down, calls POTUS's behavior 'deeply unpatriotic and corrupt'

Rep[ulsive] Adam Schiff (D[weeb]-CA) is once again condemning President Trump and claims he has evidence of collusions with the Russians, which in itself is not illegal unless there's evidence of a conspiracy to go along with it.

Schiff[less]'s comments come in light of Attorney General William Barr's four-page summary of Robert Mueller's investigation, which Barr wrote found no evidence beyond reasonable doubt that President Trump colluded with Russia to swing the 2016 presidential election.

The House Intel Committee chair-dweeb continues to insist that, despite the fact that there aren't anymore indictments, President Trump committed acts that were "deeply unpatriotic, unethical and corrupt," which is almost as bad as accusing a sitting president of something that is factually groundless, at least by what is clearly known.

“There is plenty of evidence of collusion and corrupt co-mingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians,” Schiff claimed during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Wednesday. “But I fully accept that as a prosecutor that he couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that crime.”

There is also no proof that Adam Schiff beats his wife and nobody could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he does so on a regular basis . . . or maybe the other way around, but maybe he does. I don't know for sure and I accept the fact that there's a lack of evidence, but I suspect that he just might be beating the hell out of his wife or she's beating him.

Schiff added that although he accepts Robert Mueller's ruling that President Trump could not be legally implicated in corruption, but does not necessarily believe that means the president didn't commit a crime, anymore than Schiff may or may not have committed treason. But all this negative talk about a sitting president gives me pause and I have to wonder if Schiff is working for the Russians. There seems to be some evidence that he may be working for them because he is doing exactly what they would want him to do under the circumstances.

“I always said, well, there was ample evidence of collusion in the public record,” Schiff claimed. "Whether Bob Mueller could prove the crime of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt would be up to him and I would accept his judgment and I do.”

In addition, Schiff addressed the allegations put forth by Trump's former lying lawyer Michael Cohen.

Cohen said that Trump was aware of Roger Stone's efforts to work with Wikileaks to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Again, Schiff is falling right into Putin's pocket. He also lied to the Mueller investigation, is a known liar, and is going to prison for lying, so take whatever he says as a lie unless he can prove otherwise.

“There is no doubt about how the president touted the Wikileaks releases,” Schiff claimed. “All of this is in the public domain, and whether it is criminal or not, as I said the other day in committee, it’s deeply unpatriotic, unethical, and corrupt.”

Schiff and other House leaders have demanded Attorney General Barr provide the full, un-redacted Mueller report, and voted to authorize a subpoena for the documents on Wednesday. Naturally, this is a political ploy because it is unlawful for the names of the innocent and other sensitive material to be released until it has been reviewed and properly redacted to protect them and the sensitive information.

Many conservative figures have argued that a judge will likely not issue a subpoena for the documents because it contains sensitive information about individuals who are not going to be indicted on any crime.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet