Biden: "Rational" gun 'policy' is to ban '50 clips in a weapon' and more gibberish

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden knows as much about weaponry as Alexandria Obviously-Comatose knows about psychocypernetics and the branches of government.

Regarding guns, he believes we need a "rational policy" that ensures people cannot have "50 clips in a weapon," which illustrates that he doesn't know a clip from a round, a round from his butt, and his butt from AOC.

"Middle class Joe" as he claims people call him, added that a person would need a lot more than an AK-47 to take on a tyrannical government. He made his brilliant observations on the New Hampshire campaign trail while discussing why children learn active shooter drills in schools, saying, 'because we're unwilling to have a rational policy that says you cannot have 20, 30, 40, 50 clips in a weapon."

The Biden Special

And like the broken clock analogy that's right twice a day, the clip analogy is correct--you absolutely cannot jam even 2 clips in a weapon at the same time.

Biden also tossed out the claim: “I now have over 58% of the NRA members acknowledging that you cannot own an assault weapon. There is no need for it. You can’t have a magazine that is more than 10 rounds in it.”

The NRA told Daily Wire that Biden's claim is pure bullcrap because as a private organization, they do not give out private information on its members, and certainly not for polling purposes.

At a different point in his spectacular town hall, the Democratic rear-runner said, “Those who say, ‘The tree of liberty is watered with the blood of patriots’ – a great line, well, guess what: The fact is, if you’re going to take on the government, you need an F-15 with Hellfire Missiles. There is no way an AK-47 is going to take care of you if you’re worried about the government knocking down your door.”

F-15's don't use Hellfire missiles in their arsenal. Helicopters and drones are the main users of this air to ground missile. But c'mon, man . . . it sounds macho.

Biden’s remarks drew instant mockery online from critics who attacked his abject ignorance on weaponry.

Federalist co-founder Sean Davis wrote: “Joe Biden is so dain-bramaged that he thinks ‘The government will bomb your house if you get out of line’ is an A+ argument against the 2A in the state whose motto—’Live Free or Die’—was coined by a militiaman who personally defeated the British Empire.”

Biden’s ignorant gun control policies includes banning semi-automatic firearms and “magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them,” which effectively would ban the overwhelming majority of firearms.

Not only do Biden’s views on guns go against the U.S. Constitution, they are also non-nonsensical and only work in favor of miscreants who own illegal firearms.

For example, last September Biden attacked Texas Governor Greg Abbott for signing a bill into law that made it easier for Texas to carry firearms into their places of worship.

“Dealing with firearms, it is irrational, with all due respect to the governor of Texas, irrational what they are doing,” Biden told reporters on September 2. 

“On the very day you see a mass shooting … and we’re talking about loosening access to have guns, to be able to take them into places of worship, it’s just absolutely irrational. It’s totally irrational.” Which is why Biden is an idiot who is consistently falling in the polling because it was Jack Wilson, a good guy with a gun, who saved lives in a church shooting several months later.

But maybe the Democrats don't want to stop mass killing. After all, every one of them agreed that killing a mass murderer terrorist, Cassem Soleimani, was something we should not have done.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Florida school shooter wants inheritance to go to charity says his lawyer

Miami -- The 19-year-old scumcrumpet who is accused of killing 17 people at the Parkland, Florida high school on Valentine's Day had inherited an $800,000 trust left to him by his adoptive mother. Now his defense lawyer is claiming on Wednesday that this piece of garbage wants to donate the money to charity.

It's so nice to hear the shooter had a change of heart [or in this case, actually grew a heart] and wants to pay for his sins.

The accused shooter appeared at a hearing in Broward County Court to determine if he needs a court-appointed lawyer or can afford one through the trust he and his 18-year-old brother received.

"He wants that money donated to an organization that he believes would facilitate healing in our community," his defense attorney, Melissa McNeil told the court. Judge Elizabeth Scherer did not yet make a ruling on the matter.

Perhaps the shooter should leave the money to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the site of the shooting. 

The funds could go directly to David Hogg, the 17-year-old who, by virtue of being at the school during the shooting, is considered by the mainstream media of being a gun-control genius [in spite of his inability to be accepted to any of the four colleges to which he applied]. The money could fund his transportation across the nation for his profanity-laced TV appearances in which he bullies conservatives and claims victimhood.

I believe the charity offer is a ploy for this heartless shooter to avoid the death penalty and I hope the public isn't fooled by it.

We need to keep their names and photos out of the news of the mass murderers. And when people like David Hogg stand on the graves of his fellow students to push a political agenda, we need to push back. 

If Hogg has an opinion that says, for example,  anyone who disagrees with him wants to see more dead children (e.g., Dana Loesch, an NRA spokesperson) we have the right and obligation to push back on such an immoral and disgusting accusation.



Tweet

Bad guy dead, good guy triumphs

A bad guy with a gun shot and wounded two students at Great Mills High School in Maryland. The bad guy with a gun was confronted with a brave good guy with a gun [not to be confused with the Broward County Sheriff's deputy who had guns but were afraid to go into the fray to stop a massacre] and was shot and killed. 

The brave guy is Blaine Gaskill.

The bad guy was the only fatality but a female student and a male student were also shot and are in stable condition.

"Our school resource officer [SRO] was alerted to the event. He pursued the shooter, engaged the shooter, fired a round at the shooter," St. Mary's County Sheriff Tim Cameron said. "The shooter fired a round as well. In the hours and days to come, we'll be able to determine if our school resource officer's round struck the shooter."

Meaning that it's possible the bad guy was so scared of being shot and not immediately killed, that he quickly killed himself to avoid the pain.

Blaine Gaskill

I suspect the good guy with a gun hit his target--he has a lot of firearms experience and the bad guy with a gun was, thankfully, a lousy shot.

The Maryland State Police, the FBI and agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms are on the scene helping with the investigation. In all probability, tobacco had nothing to do with the crime.

The school has about 1,600 students and is located near the Patuxent River Naval Air Station, about 60 miles from Washington D.C. The scene there is said to be "contained."

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) tweeted that his office was "closely monitoring the situation at Great Mills High School."

"Maryland State Police is in touch with local law enforcement and ready to provide support." Then he pulled out his bipartisan political talking points flashcard and tweeted: "Our prayers are with [fill in the blanks] students, school personnel, and first responders."

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md) who was en route to the school to probably give his thoughts and prayers and use gun control as a solution, tweeted that he'll be at a press conference regarding the shooting.

A POS self-described "reporter" named Jeff Pearlman labeled the SRO "a gross, despicable human being." 

Of course, for Pearlman to say something so disgusting and despicable only shows that he was self-revealing and has to be as stupid as a dead bottle fly.

Perhaps Pearlman was simply trying to become relevant, but it isn't working. He's as relevant as algebra to a blowfish trying to decide on what to have for

dinner.

Last month, St. Mary's County Sheriff's Office arrested two teenage boys for "Threats of Mass Violence." A 39-year-old scumwafer was also arrested on related charges after the teens threatened a mass shooting at Leonardtown High School, which is only 10 miles from Great Mills High.

 Police obtained a search warrant that led them to find semi-automatic rifles, handguns and other weapons along with ammunition.




Tweet

Is Trump right about video games?

On the heels of the Feb. 14 Parkland, Florida school shooting, President Trump told gaming industry leaders on Thursday that video games have been linked to real-world violence. The shooting also launched a predictable political debate over gun control laws.

But is Trump correct? Are video games a contributing factor, a catalyst, to armed violence?

The science is not "in." The issue remains unsolved, and opinion goes both ways. 

Trump spoke with the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) less than a month since the shooting which killed 17. It was the latest mass shooting in the USA with over 30,000 gun-related deaths, mostly from suicide followed by handguns, many of which are obtained illegally and used in gun violence in Democratically controlled cities with tough gun control laws that are often not enforced by law enforcement.

After the mass shooting, Trump said that video games might be a possible contributing factor in firearms violence.

In a January 16, 2018 paper in Science Daily, researchers found no evidence to support Trump's belief that video games make players more violent.

The series of experiments had over 3,000 participants and demonstrated that video game concepts "do not 'prime' players to behave in certain ways and that increasing the realism of violent video games does not necessarily increase aggression in game players."

The dominant model of learning in games is that by exposing players to concepts, such as violence in games, makes those concepts easier to use in 'real life.' This is known as priming. 

The left-leaning CBS News released a study by The Radiological Society of North America that showed playing violent video games might actually produce temporary neural changes that help control emotions, rather than cause violence though priming.

Brain scans in 11 young men who shot at video game characters for about 10 hours in a week's time had decreased activity in areas of the brain associated with inhibition, attention, and decision-making.

After the Florida shooting, Trump said that he's "hearing more and more people say the level of violence on video games is really shaping young people's thoughts," and rather than exploring the data and making an informed decision, he believes that speaking to interest groups will help decide what he hopes to do.

Let me be the first to say here, I do not play violent video games nor would I want my family to play them. I think they're horrible, but I also believe in the First Amendment, and there is no conclusive proof that they cause people to act violently. 

Oh, and another point, most mass shooters are over 21. The real problem with the last tragedy wasn't the gun nor the shooter's age; it was clearly law enforcement's failure to do its job.

Freaking period!

Tweet

Top GOP donor threatens to stop funding if they don't do as he says

"I will not write another check" unless GOP candidates support assault weapons ban, threatened Al Hoffman Jr., a Florida-based real estate developer, according to The New York Times. 

In an email to six Republican leaders on Saturday, Hoffman denounced the spate of mass shootings across the United States over the years and demanded that GOP politicians do what he tells them to do: go against the Second Amendment and take away the American citizens' right to self-defense.

"I will not write another check unless they all support a ban on assault weapons," he wrote in an email to The Times. "Enough is enough!"

Interestingly, Hoffman did not implore former President Barack Obama to do the same regarding what he labels 'assault weapons' when the Democrats had control of both the House and Senate.

Somehow the left, and some like Hoffman, believe that tighter gun laws will put an end to these horrific mass shootings. It turns out that the gun laws are as effective as "gun-free zones," a place where shooters go where they know that nobody will shoot back.

In an interview with the ultra-liberal Times, Hoffman said he reached the "end of the road" supporting candidates who refused to back tighter gun laws. He did not mention exactly how tighter gun laws will decrease the number of mass shootings because they can't.

It seems that one way to begin dealing with this problem should begin at home. Parents teaching their kids to respect all life. Parents being parents instead of buddies, getting rid of violent video games that normalize killing, monitoring their kids, having 'family time.'

And the media needs to stop putting up photos of the killers and saying their names over and over, analyzing the crime all day long into the night. [You know who you are, Fox News.]

Schools cannot be "gun-free zones." The kids need to be protected by trained people with guns, particularly concealed guns carried by security and teachers who know how to use a firearm. It would be wise to limit entrances to school and have exits that only open from inside the building. Yes, and airport-style detectors with armed security would definitely limit the danger to students.

Consider how Israel does their security--they have virtually no mass shootings at their schools because they can't afford to be politically correct. 

The same is true at their airports--when have you ever heard of an El-Al flight being blown up?

When someone suspicious is identified, be it face-to-face or on social media [as in "see something, say something"] there must be follow-up by law enforcement. If agencies such as the FBI fail to act as they did in Parkland, Florida, people are going to become complacent.

Learning to profile potential mass shooters needs to become "Mission One" to authorities, and political correctness needs to go by way of the dinosaur.

Hoffman, like most liberals, see gun control laws as a simple solution. That's a fool's way of thinking. We need to change the culture and ensure the perpetrators remain a footnote in the media.

It should go without saying that people who go on shooting rampages are mentally ill or carry out a mentally ill religious belief. 


Tweet