Cop fired for exercising his First Amendment rights representing Kamala Harris as a watermelon

A part-time sheriff's deputy in Oakland County, Michigan was fired for posting a photo of a carved watermelon effigy of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), [who may or may not be the Vice President-elect, depending on the official election results] as   WXYZ Detroit reports.

The Facebook post included a photo of three carved pumpkins meant to represent President Donald Trump, President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President Mike Pence. A second photo shows a carved watermelon meant to portray Harris. The post has since been removed, the report said.

The firing occurred the day the post was brought to the attention of the Oakland County Sheriff's Office.

The Rev. Dr. Wendell Anthony, president of the NAACP Detroit Branch said that relating African Americans to watermelons "is linked to buffoonery and to less than." He added, "I believe that the intent was purposely structured to diminish and to dilute the significance of the first African American … as vice president of these United States.”

But, on the other hand, I believe it was more likely a mindless attempt at humor and a display of disapproval of Harris, a far Left Democrat whose political record is fraught with questionable behavior, and whose laugh can put off and anger the saints among us.

Of course, I could be wrong and the deputy is a racist, however, I believe that losing one's employment is rather drastic and I wonder if the deputy was questioned about why he posted this on Facebook and what he was thinking when he did. When the left calls every Trump voter a racist, you have to wonder who the real racists are. 

Maybe the deputy is a racist, maybe he isn't. You don't know and neither do I.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Pence slams slimy NY Times

A fake news report in The New York Times claiming that Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans are running 'shadow campaigns' to defeat President Trump in 2020 was dismissed by Pence as "disgraceful and offensive."

His White House statement said: 

"Today's article in The New York Times is disgraceful and offensive to me, my family and out entire team. The allegations in this article are categorically false and represent just the latest attempt by the media to divide this administration."

The Times, once known as "The Paper of Record," is now known as "The Canary Cage Liner," published the story on Sunday and posits that Mr. Pence and Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) and Gov. John Kasich (R-Oh.) are visiting early voting states and acting as if they're running in 2020.

Pence also said: 

"Thanks to the President's leadership, we are rebuilding the military, ISIS is on the run, and we've seen more than one million jobs created while the stock market hits all time highs.

"The American people know that I could not be more honored to be working side by side with a president who is making America great again.

"Whatever fake news may come our way, my entire team will continue to focus all our efforts to advance the President's agenda and see him re-elected in 2020. Any suggestions otherwise is both laughable and absurd." 

The Times has always been far left-leaning even going so far as to defend and lionize Alger Hiss, an alleged Communist spy for Russia. 

Now The Times is claiming that it's due to the Russia controversy regarding election meddling and the Trump administration's collusion with them, the Republicans are jumping ship on Trump. "Pence's schedule is so full of political events that Republicans joke that he is acting more like a second-term vice president hoping to clear the field than a No. 2 sworn in a little over six months ago."

It's understandable how people no longer trust the media--they make stuff up to suit their political agendas. 

Oh, my canary just gave The Times a gift.

Tweet

Almost 2 million non-citizens illegally registered to vote

A huge number of non-citizen Hispanics, perhaps as many as 2 million, were illegally registered to vote in the US according to a nationwide poll. Guess for which party they voted.

Why is it that only conservatives really want voter ID and immigration laws that are on the books to actually be followed?

The National Hispanic Survey provided more evidence for anti-voter fraud conservatives and supported an analysis by Old Dominion University professors who said non-citizens illegally voted in potentially large numbers.

President Trump said he's going to appoint a task force to uncover voter fraud and Vice President Pence will head it. The task force will focus on inaccurate voter registration polls, which are maintained by each state and the District of Columbia.

White House adviser Stephen Miller told ABC News that "It is a fact and you will not deny it, that there are massive numbers of non-citizens in this country who are registered to vote. That is a scandal. We should stop the presses."

The Hispanic survey was conducted in June 2013 by McLaughlin and Associates but didn't get much press. The purpose was to analyze the opinions of US resident Hispanics on a number of different issues.

The sample size consisted of 800 Hispanics, 448 of whom said they were non-citizens and of those, 13 percent admitted they were registered to vote. Presumably, the 448 non-citizens would consist of illegal immigrants and non-citizens who are in the country legally, such as visa holders or permanent residents.

It is a felony based on 1996 federal law, for non-citizens to register. The poll didn't ask if they actually voted.

Mathematically, if the 13 percent of the 2013 US Census numbers for non-citizen Hispanic adults were applied, that would amount to about 1.5 million illegally registered Latinos, claims James Agresti, the director of the research nonprofit "Just Facts."Accounting for margin of error, the range is from 1.0 million to 2.1 million.

That's a lot of illegal Democratic votes.

Of course not every illegal voter would actually vote Democratic. At least one to 200 would possibly vote conservative--most likely, one and he would have probably hit the wrong lever.

"Contrary to the claims of many media outlets and so-called fact-checkers, this nationally representative scientific poll confirms that a sizable number of non-citizen in the US are registered to vote," Mr. Agresti said.

In 2013, another 8.3 million non-Hispanic non-citizens lived in the US, according to the Census. One can only wonder how many of them were registered to vote.

As our immigrant population, both legal and illegal, keeps growing, the problem of non-citizens voting illegally has caught the attention of grass-roots conservative groups. Democrats stand to gain with the alien vote and they haven't really complained about the problem--in fact, they deny it exists.

In 2014, two professors at Old Dominion University (ODU) and one at George Mason University collaborated to do a data-driven analysis of non-citizen voting. Their data came from the biennial Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), headquartered at Harvard University.

Using CCES responses to citizenship questions, the ODU team estimated that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in the 2008 Obama election. They projected a range as low as 38,000 and as high as 2.8 million.

Of course, the CCES authors at Harvard (where they teach young men to wash their hands after they use the urinal) reacted with outrage, claiming the small number of respondents among a sample of 38,000 made the responses meaningless. They picked at their numbers and came to the leftist Harvard conclusion that zero non-citizens voted.

That should give everyone pause, in spite of the liberal media proclaiming the ODU study was now "debunked." The ODU professors stand by their work and have filed counter-rebuttals.

It should be noted that Harvard professors, all but Alan Dershowitz, believe Al Gore is a global warming genius.

The 2013 Hispanic Survey tends to confirm the ODU work as the survey's 13 percent registration rate is totally in sync with what the CCES data indicates in multiple elections.

The ODU paper found that in 2008, 2010 and 2012 between 14.5 and 15.6 percent of self-declared non-citizen adults were registered to vote. Thus, the CCES and National Hispanic Survey data align very nicely with each other.

But don't tell that to the liberal media.

In spite of the stupidity of the liberal media, the White House is not backing off from the issue. Stephen Miller made the case on Sunday's "ABC's This Week" where he totally pissed of former Clinton towel boy, George Stephanopoulos.

"An issue of voter fraud is something we're going to be looking at very seriously and very hard," Miller said. "But the reality is, is that we know for a fact, you have massive numbers of non-citizens registered to vote in this country. Nobody disputes that."

"The White House has provided enormous evidence," he added, "with respect to voter fraud, with respect to people being registered in more than one state, dead people voting, non-citizens being registered to vote. And, as a country, we should be aghast about the fact that you have people who have no right to vote in this country, registered to vote, canceling out the franchise of lawful citizens of this country."

Stephanopoulos didn't deal with that, however, he went after President Trump for claiming there were 3 to 5 million illegals voting November 8th and that voters were bused in from Massachusetts to vote in New Hampshire.

Then George's cell phone rang and he put Bill Clinton on hold while he finished his "fair and balanced" attack on Miller.



Tweet

Snowflakes plan a fun blockage on Trump trump of Clinton

The snowflakes want to crash the inauguration party. The anti-Trump group plans to disrupt the inauguration with "blockades" at security checkpoints to a "dance party" by VP-elect Mike Pence's house.

They call themselves #DisruptJ20 and they held a press conference Thursday announcing their various plans to kill the fun and wreak havoc on Trump's January 20 inauguration as well as the days leading up to it, which would be now.

A conservative group shared with FoxNews.com what they claimed was a #DisruptJ20 meeting at a Washington church. It was recorded by Trevor Loudon with Capital Research Center, and it details a member of the group detailing plans to "do everything we can to try and stop people from being able to access the inauguration."

The audio discusses how on January 18, there is to be a "pure dance party at Mike Pence's house. "It's his last few days living in Chevy Chase before he moves into the vice presidential residence, and we're going to send him off with a bang," the woman on the audio says.

She goes on to say the group will turn its attention to the pro-Trump "DeploraBall" on January 19. She describes the event as an "alt-right neo-Nazi . . . party to celebrate Trump."

"We're gonna crash it," she brags.

On inauguration morning, which is the following day, members say they plan to block entrance points, transportation and roads leading to the inauguration.

"We're going to be doing blockades," the woman says. "We're going to [be] blockading checkpoints into the security zones. We're also going to be blockading roads and other modes of transit into the city."

On inauguration day, the fascists group plans an "anti-Capitalist [a term coined by Karl Marx], anti-fascist bloc" that "will be an unpermitted [sic] march that will be leaving from Logan Square."

Defending the group's agenda the woman on the audio said: "We're exercising our freedom of speech and really want to set a tone for the next few years that there's a massive body of people . . . who are very concerned about the dangerous direction Donald Trump is taking our country in."

Imagine what's going to happen when Trump is actually the President, not just a person waiting to take over the job from the most divisive incompetent president we've ever had. A president who lead this country from behind and always finding something racist about every white person not marching to the beat of his drum. A president who would quicker defend a thug like Michael Brown, or a phony "Clock Boy" over those who defend us against them.

One #DisruptJ20 member described plans to blockade checkpoints and he hope to "turn the inauguration into as big of a clusterf*** as possible."

If #DisruptJ20 impedes on the rights of people to attend the inauguration they need to be stopped. They have the right to protest, but supporters of Trump have the right to enjoy his inauguration.

A fascist is a dictator with complete power, forcibly putting down opposition and criticism. Trump has a U.S. Constitution that prevents that from happening, and I believe he's aware of this. 

Insofar as him being a racist, there is nothing he has said that supports that claim, but that's always the left's claim about everyone they don't like, because that's all they've got.

Having the vote of a moron (and plenty of them voted for Obama) does not make the candidate a moron, anymore than it make Trump a racist because racists support him. 

If a rabbi supports Trump, does that make him Jewish?

Hitler was a vegan, does that make all vegans Nazis?




Tweet