Pence slams slimy NY Times

A fake news report in The New York Times claiming that Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans are running 'shadow campaigns' to defeat President Trump in 2020 was dismissed by Pence as "disgraceful and offensive."

His White House statement said: 

"Today's article in The New York Times is disgraceful and offensive to me, my family and out entire team. The allegations in this article are categorically false and represent just the latest attempt by the media to divide this administration."

The Times, once known as "The Paper of Record," is now known as "The Canary Cage Liner," published the story on Sunday and posits that Mr. Pence and Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) and Gov. John Kasich (R-Oh.) are visiting early voting states and acting as if they're running in 2020.

Pence also said: 

"Thanks to the President's leadership, we are rebuilding the military, ISIS is on the run, and we've seen more than one million jobs created while the stock market hits all time highs.

"The American people know that I could not be more honored to be working side by side with a president who is making America great again.

"Whatever fake news may come our way, my entire team will continue to focus all our efforts to advance the President's agenda and see him re-elected in 2020. Any suggestions otherwise is both laughable and absurd." 

The Times has always been far left-leaning even going so far as to defend and lionize Alger Hiss, an alleged Communist spy for Russia. 

Now The Times is claiming that it's due to the Russia controversy regarding election meddling and the Trump administration's collusion with them, the Republicans are jumping ship on Trump. "Pence's schedule is so full of political events that Republicans joke that he is acting more like a second-term vice president hoping to clear the field than a No. 2 sworn in a little over six months ago."

It's understandable how people no longer trust the media--they make stuff up to suit their political agendas. 

Oh, my canary just gave The Times a gift.

Tweet

Trump to Russians: Firing 'Nut Job' Comey eased pressure from investigation

Washington --The New York Times reported that President Trump told Russian officials in the White House that firing former FBI Director James Comey, relieved "great pressure" on him, according to a document summarizing the meeting.

The document has not been verified, was "read by an American official." Nothing has been confirmed so the Times jumped right on it without checking facts.

Mr. Trump allegedly said, "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off." He then added, "I'm not under investigation."

The White House document that supposedly contained President Trump's comments was, according to The Times, "based on notes taken from inside the Oval Office and has been circulated as the official account of the meeting."

The irony in this is the abject indifference to the leaking of the document itself, which is illegal and seditious. 

Wanting a president to fail, any president, is wanting the country to go down the wrong path, to fail just to selfishly appease the egos of the haters.

The New York Times was never fair to conservatives, even though President Trump isn't actually a conservative. But any paper that tried to cast doubt about the guilt of Alger Hiss, an admitted spy, isn't going to treat any Republican fairly.

I just wish Mr. Trump would stop complaining about it and just fulfill his promises.


To follow Brain Flushings click the Follow tab in the margin.

Tweet

The suicidal left

If the New York Times is correct, the NRA is responsible for the Orlando terrorist attack Sunday. that killed 49 and severely wounded 53 others.

Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the NRA,  must have conspired with Omar Mateen who then slaughtered 49 and severely wounded 53 others at the Pulse Orlando nightclub that caters primarily to the LGBT infidel crowd. 

If you don't believe that and don't believe the New York Times, you must be homophobic and Islamophobic.

Sadly, the LGBT community is blaming the guns for the killing of fellow LGBTers. That makes as much sense as going after pressure cookers and box cutters for the Boston Marathon bombing and 911, respectively. 

Using this logic, they should go after cars being used by Hamasshole sympathizers because some of them are using cars to run down Jews. in Gaza.

And why don't they ever go after knives? Knives are everywhere and can kill just as dead as a gun .  .  .  like a baseball bat.

Sure, focus on the weapon, not the person using it. That's liberal logic and it works like a lifetime Food Stamp recipient.

The New York Times hates conservatives and doesn't appear to love America all that much. The Old Gray Lady defended convicted Alger Hiss, saying that he was innocent of spying for the Soviets. But even after Hiss confessed before he died, the Times still didn't want to believe it.



To The Times, Communists are heroes and everything is America's fault.




Tweet

The NY Times: America's Most Red Paper

Chelsea Manning had an Op Ed in the Gray Lady, aka The New York Times. You should remember Chelsea as Bradley Manning, but he has since changed his name to fit his self-image of a woman trapped inside a traitor's body.  It seems fitting that someone like Chelsea would write for America's most red paper.

Back in 1996, The New York Times did an obituary piece on another American traitor, Alger Hiss, who died all too soon at the age of 92. The evidence of Hiss's guilt was overwhelming but the paper referred to Alger Hiss as: " . . . the erudite diplomat and Harvard trained government lawyer who was convicted of perjury in an espionage case that became one of the great riddles of the Cold War . . . " in an article by Janny Scott. 

But columnist, George Will said that Hiss's claim to innocence up to the time of his death had become "one of the long-running lies of modern American history." I tend to believe Will and those who testified against Hiss who had no ax to grind.

It seems that the Times always goes out of its way to defend or glorify those who hate America. 

Back to Miss Manning. on August 21, 2013 the editorial board wrote that they believe the 35 year sentence Chelsea received was too severe (see New York Times ).

"He had previously pleaded guilty to lesser versions of those [Espionage Act] crimes that exposed him to 20 years behind bars. For a defense lawyer, a sentence of one-third the potential maximum [90 years] is usually not a bad outcome. But from where we sit, it is still too much, given his stated desire not to betray his country but to encourage debate on American aims and shed light on the "day to day" realities of the American war effort."

So Chelsea gave over 700,000 classified government documents to Wikileaks, the largest cache of secret material ever made public in American history for all our enemies to see, He broke the law, betrayed his oath as a military intelligence analyst, helped the enemies of the United States with information, and The New York Times thinks 35 years is "too long by any standard." 

No, 35 years is too long by The New York Times' standard because they believe Manning's intentions supersede his behavior. That makes as much sense as a drunk driver claiming he didn't mean to jump the curb and kill those people.

Mad Magazine once made light of the Times with a masthead that read: "For all the news that fits we print," a take-off on their actual slogan. The trouble is, that is no longer true of the Times, and most of the mainstream media. They often do not print what they don't want you to read. You have to get your real news from the blogs and a few conservative news outlets.

Tweet