Tyler Robinson’s Trans Furry Boyfriend Spills the Beans on Those Engraved Bullets"[

"[I] told him to make sure he doesn't set off the bullet on accident in the house."

In a twist straight out of the clown world newsroom, Lance [Twiggy] Twiggs, the trans-identifying former boyfriend of accused assassin Tyler Robinson, took the stand in audio form during Thursday’s preliminary hearing.

He revealed that Robinson had been planning to engrave bullets ahead of a so-called “hunting” trip that somehow ended with Charlie Kirk, the late Turning Point USA founder, in the crosshairs.

The police interview with Twiggs, taped months after the assassination, finally got its big courtroom debut.

According to trans-identifying Twiggs, Robinson casually mentioned a family hunting excursion and wondered if he could borrow a Dremel tool to customize some ammunition with personal messages.

Twiggs, ever the helpful sort, confirmed he had the tool, pointed out its location, and issued the single most comically oblivious warning in recent memory, all about a month before the shooting.

“He said he was going hunting with his family and he asked if we had a Dremel he could borrow because he said he wanted to engrave messages on bullets,” Twiggs explained. “I just told him where the Dremel was and told him to make sure he doesn’t set off the bullet on accident in the house, but I didn’t really think about it until then."

Twiggs added that the day after the killing, Robinson looked restless, like a man trying very hard to pretend he hadn’t just turned a conservative icon into a headline. When Twiggs pressed him in person about those late-night texts confessing to the shooting, Robinson reportedly cracked.

“[He] didn’t go into detail. I just asked him in person if what he said was true the night before and he said it was, starting crying a little bit, and he says he wishes he hadn’t done it," Twiggs said.

Some chunks of the interview were redacted on orders from Judge Tony Graf to protect the delicate rights of the defendant while the rest of America wonders how many warning signs can pile up before someone connects the dots. Robinson, 23, now stares down the possibility of the death penalty if convicted, a fitting end to what the left will no doubt call “one isolated incident” involving a trans furry’s gun-engraving roommate. Business as usual in 2026.

The chances of Robinson getting the death penalty is as slim as a police captain forgoing a doughnut, but if he does, it will take decades before it's carried out, unless some Democratic socialist in power comes along and dismisses the charges.


Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Judge rules on defense's attempt to disqualify prosecutors in Charlie Kirk murder case

In the Fourth District Court in Provo, Utah, Judge Tony Graf presided over yet another hearing in the grim aftermath of what can only be described as a political assassination. Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of murdering conservative activist Charlie Kirk, appeared remotely from his jail cell on September 16, 2025, a detail that underscores the gravity and the spectacle of the proceedings.

A Utah judge has now firmly rejected the defense's attempt to disqualify the prosecutors in the case against Tyler Robinson, the young man charged with the killing of Charlie Kirk.

On Tuesday, having considered the arguments aired at a hearing on February 3, Judge Tony Graf ruled decisively for the prosecution. He stated that the court was unpersuaded that a prosecutor’s relationship with his daughter, who had been present at the event, had improperly influenced the decision to pursue the death penalty against Robinson.

The defense had pressed their case with considerable vigor. They insisted that because Chad Grunander's daughter had attended the Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University, the very scene where Kirk was fatally shot, the entire Utah County Attorney’s Office ought to be removed from the prosecution. This familial connection, they maintained, created at least the appearance of impropriety, and that alone was sufficient to warrant disqualifying the whole office from the matter.

The county attorney’s office countered with clarity and restraint. Neither the office nor the deputy attorney in question labored under any conflict of interest, they argued, because AC (the adult child present at the college event) “did not see Charlie get shot” and “did not see anyone [in the crowd or elsewhere] with a gun.” Moreover, “nearly everything [AC] knows about the actual homicide is hearsay,” according to filings submitted by the office.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Robinson’s preliminary hearing is now set to commence on May 18 and is anticipated to span three days. Only upon its conclusion will he face arraignment, and he has yet to enter a plea.One cannot help but observe the deeper irony here. In an age when political violence has become a grotesque currency, the attempt to recuse an entire prosecutorial office on grounds so tenuous speaks volumes about the lengths to which some will go to muddy the waters of justice. Yet the judge, in his measured ruling, has reminded us that the rule of law demands more than mere appearances or speculative bias; it requires actual evidence of impropriety. The prosecution may proceed, and the grim business of determining guilt in this assassination will continue unimpeded.

Tweet

Accused Charlie Kirk Assassin Set for First In-Person Court Appearance Amid Battle Over Media Access

Well guys, here we go again with the circus surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk, one of the strongest conservative voices this country has ever seen. Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old scumcrumpet accused of gunning down the Turning Point USA founder back in September, is finally dragging himself into a Utah courtroom in person for the first time, nearly three months after they slapped the cuffs on him following that 33-hour manhunt.

This hearing in Provo is supposedly all about whether the media gets to keep cameras rolling or if the judge is going to slam the door shut even tighter. Back in October, the Utah County Sheriff's Office whined about the case being a "content tornado" that could torpedo Robinson's "fair trial." Give me a break. Judge Tony F. Grant Jr. already banned cameras from showing the suspect walking in, out, or just standing there, as if that's going to undo the mountain of publicity this creep has already generated.

And who’s calling out this nonsense? Charlie’s widow, Erika Kirk, the new CEO of Turning Point, called out this garbage. She's been fighting tooth and nail for transparency. 

In a blistering Fox News interview, she laid it out plain: "There were cameras all over my husband when he was murdered. There have been cameras all over my friends and family mourning. There have been cameras all over me, analyzing my every move, analyzing my every smile, my every tear. We deserve to have cameras in there," Erika stated. 'Why not be transparent?"

Exactly. The victim's family gets hounded relentlessly, but heaven forbid we see the accused in the dock. Media outlets like Fox are pushing back hard, demanding advance notice if the defense tries to seal anything else. Their attorney, Michael Judd, nailed it: an open courtroom "safeguards the integrity of the fact-finding process" while strengthening public confidence in judicial proceedings.

Legal analyst Roger Bonakdar called Thursday's hearing a "one-trick pony" focused on rolling back coverage, pointing out the bizarre flip-flop: "It has been pretty odd that the information tap was at full blast for a little while and now it's completely shut off," he said. "It's really kind of inconsistent with how you see cases move forward typically."

Remember, early on the feds were blasting out surveillance pics and begging for tips. Now? Total blackout. 

They're even fretting over whether Robinson shows up in civilian clothes or shackles, his team claims prison garb would prejudice people. Bonakdar again: "Courts oftentimes will prohibit the media from depicting the defendant in shackles or in jail clothing because it creates this inference of guilt."

But come on: "Anybody who does a Google search will know… at some point it may be an exercise in futility. Is the damage already done?"

Prosecutors aren’t hiding their plans; they're going for the death penalty. And right from the jump, President Trump was crystal clear: "With a high degree of certainty, we have him. I hope he gets the death penalty."

This isn't about fairness for the killer; it's about shielding him while Charlie's legacy gets dragged through the mud by the usual suspects. The American people deserve to see justice play out in the open. No more games.

What do you think?

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you.

Tweet

Nexstar’s Still Shunning Kimmel’s Smirkfest, Even After Disney’s All-Clear

Well, folks, the late-night clown car is back, but not everyone's ready to buy a ticket to the circus. 

Nexstar Media Group, which runs 32 ABC affiliate stations, is keeping Jimmy Kimmel Live! on the bench, despite Disney cowardly waving the green flag for its return. You'd think a corporate giant like Disney could strong-arm everyone into compliance, but Nexstar's not budging, not yet, anyway. And honestly, it's refreshing to see someone stand their ground against the Hollywood sanctimony machine.

Nexstar dropped the hammer in a statement Tuesday, saying, "We made a decision last week to preempt 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' following what ABC referred to as Mr. Kimmel's 'ill-timed and insensitive' comments at a critical time in our national discourse. We stand by that decision pending assurance that all parties are committed to fostering an environment of respectful, constructive dialogue in the markets we serve." 

So, Kimmel's mouth got him in trouble, and we're not here for it until he learns to play nice. They added that Kimmel's show can still be streamed on Disney's platforms, while their stations will stick to local news and programming that actually matters to their viewers. Smart move, less sanctimonious snark, more real-world relevance.

Sinclair Broadcast Group, which controls 30 ABC affiliates, is also keeping Kimmel's smug mug off their airwaves. Their statement was equally no-nonsense: "Beginning Tuesday night, Sinclair will be preempting 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' across our ABC affiliate stations and replacing it with news programming. Discussions with ABC are ongoing as we evaluate the show's potential return." Sounds like they aren't holding their breath for Kimmel to suddenly become a beacon of civility.

This whole clusterfrack kicked off when Kimmel, in his infinite wisdom, decided to weigh in on the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10. Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two little girls, was fatally shot in the neck by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson during a college event.

Robinson, reportedly linked to a gender confused partner, allegedly confessed via text messages, according to the FBI. Kimmel, never one to let facts get in the way of a good narrative, went on a rant last Monday, accusing conservatives of hitting "new lows" by trying to "characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." 

Classy, Jimmy. Nothing says "thoughtful discourse" like baselessly smearing a grieving conservative base while a family buries their loved one. It is definitely time for conservatives to consider boycotting his sponsors now that he's going back on air.

The backlash was swift. Disney yanked Kimmel's show last Wednesday after Nexstar and Sinclair pulled it from their stations, and even the FCC's Brendan Carr called Kimmel's remarks "some of the sickest conduct," hinting at potential consequences. Kimmel, doubling down like a true Tinseltown titan, reportedly told execs he wouldn’t apologize. The left cried "free speech!" while conservatives pointed out that falsely tying Kirk's killer to MAGA wasn’t free speech; it was reckless defamation.

Disney announced Monday that Kimmel, [who is also known for his blackface when he did a Karl Malone imitation] is back on ABC Tuesday night, is likely to address the controversy with his trademark smirk and zero self-awareness. 

Kimmel doing blackface

But Nexstar and Sinclair aren't going along with their crap, and good for them. 

Nexstar, the biggest local TV broadcasting group in the U.S., reaches 220 million people across 116 markets. They're not some small-time operation, they have real clout, and they're using it. Just last month, they inked a $6.2 billion deal to acquire Tegna, which will expand their reach and boost political ad revenue in key election markets like Phoenix and Atlanta. That deal is still pending FCC approval, but it shows Nexstar's focused on real priorities, not Kimmel's ego trip.

Clay Travis, the OutKick founder, weighed in on The Will Cain Show, and you can bet he didn't mince words about ABC's handling of this fiasco. Kimmel's return might thrill the blue-check crowd, but with Nexstar and Sinclair holding firm, it's clear not everyone is ready to forgive and forget. Maybe Jimmy should take a cue from the affiliates and focus on "respectful, constructive dialogue" instead of cheap shots. 

But hey, I'm not holding my breath.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure.

Tweet

DNA evidence on Charlie Kirk's shooter is in

FBI Director Kash Patel dropped a bombshell on "Fox & Friends" Monday, claiming they have the goods on Tyler Robinson, the guy fingered for trying to take out Charlie Kirk. DNA evidence, straight from the scene.

Patel didn't mince words: "I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the suspect in custody." 

The probability that the DNA belongs to someone else rather than Robinson, is practically zero. Profiling, which compares genetic markers, is very precise. The probability of two unrelated people sharing the same DNA profile using the standard 13 to 20 markers used in forensic analysis, is less than 1 in a billion! So in addition to visual evidence, the shooter's father's statement, and his LGBTQ partner's statement, the chances that Robinson is not the shooter is slim to none.

Cops say Robinson pulled a stuntman move, leaping off a roof at Utah Valley University right after the shooting, then hightailed it through some woods into a nearby neighborhood leaving behind a DNA-drenched towel and a screwdriver. The only thing missing was an inscription with his name on these items.

Right now, Robinson is cooling his heels under "special watch" in Utah, giving cops the silent treatment. He might not be talking, but that DNA's got plenty to say.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

Another hater arrested for disgusting act outside Turning Point USA headquarte4rs

In Phoenix, outside the headquarters of Turning Point USA, a scene unfolded that could only be described as a grotesque parody of dissent. A young man, draped in the irony of a black t-shirt emblazoned with the American flag, was caught desecrating a memorial dedicated to Charlie. This act of vandalism, on a somber Sunday, was not merely an assault on stone and sentiment but a calculated affront to the very ideals the memorial sought to honor.

The scumwafer, later identified as 19-year-old Ryder Corral, was seen rampaging through the tribute, kicking over flowers, vases, and flags with the petulance of a child toppling a sandcastle. 

His rampage, spanning some 15 yards, was mercifully cut short when onlookers, no doubt incensed by the spectacle, wrestled him to the ground. The police, swiftly intervening, carted him off in handcuffs, a fitting denouement for such a craven display likely inspired by a media with a leftist agenda. 

One cannot help but note the grim coincidence: Corral's attire bore a striking resemblance to the t-shirt worn by Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the September 10 shooting of Kirk. A pattern, perhaps, or merely the uniform of a certain strain of reckless defiance?

The Phoenix Police Department, with characteristic efficiency, issued a statement: "Corral will be booked on multiple charges to include criminal damage and disorderly conduct," they declared. "An updated media advisory will be sent out once Corral is booked and a booking number is available." One wonders what animates such acts, whether it is ideology run amok or simply the thrill of destruction. What is clear, however, is that this was no mere tantrum; it was a deliberate desecration, a middle finger raised not just to Kirk but to the broader cause he represents. In an age where memorials are battlegrounds and symbols are weaponized, Corral's actions remind us that the fight for meaning is as fierce as ever.

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet