And so the plot sickens between Clintons and Epstein: Report

A report published on Tuesday alleges that former President Bill "I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton, and his wife, the two-time presidential Democratic loser Hillary Clinton, visited the New Mexico ranch of convicted pedophile and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The visits were reported to have taken place nearly every year since Bill Clinton left office after his second term.

“Bill and Hillary Clinton stayed at Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious ‘baby-making ranch’ almost every year after they left the White House, according to the disgraced financier’s estate manager,” The Daily Mail reported.

“The former president was Epstein’s closest ‘celebrity mate’ and the Clintons, along with daughter Chelsea, visited Zorro Ranch "a whole bunch of times," a former contractor who ran the IT system at the property told DailyMailTV in an exclusive interview.”

The Clintons never stayed in the main mansion on the sprawling 10,000 acre property but stayed in one of the guest houses.

“This is all according to security expert Jared Kellogg, who was brought in by long-standing ranch manager Brice Gordon to improve security and set up a camera system at the main house and ‘cowboy village’,” The Daily Mail continued. “Kellogg said that at the time of his site walk of Epstein’s property, he had barely any knowledge of Epstein’s reputation but he said Gordon spent most of the time boasting about the Clintons’ frequent appearance at the estate.”

“My access was very controlled," Kellogg said. "During the site walk, it was dictated where I could and couldn’t go. There were certain facilities I wasn’t allowed to go in, which was odd, as they were boarded up, and they looked like they could have big parties in them, but I didn’t think much of it. They wanted to put very, very limited camera coverage on the main house itself.”

The New York Times reported over the summer that Epstein allegedly wanted to turn his ranch into a place where he would impregnate vast numbers of women in what The Times described as “transhumanism,” which “critics have likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding.”

Epstein, who may or may not have killed himself, was arrested by federal law enforcement officials on sex trafficking charges in early July after returning to the United States and supposedly committed suicide in a New York City prison approximately a month later.

When asked for comment by The Daily Mail, the Clintons pointed to a statement that they released over the summer which “denied he had ever visited any of Epstein’s residences, apart from once at Epstein’s home in New York City.”

That is apparently a big fat lie.

Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.





Tweet

NY Times stands with Sarah Jeong after racist tweets surface

The New York Times is standing with its decision to hire tech writer Sarah Jeong despite a Twitter history of derogatory tweets aimed at gays, blacks, lesbians and transgender people.

Oh, wait. I got it wrong--it was aimed at white people, particularly old white men, but not limited to age.

"Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men," Jeong wrote in July 2014. That was merely one of many messages that have gone viral.

On Wednesday social media went ballistic with images of racist tweets sent from an unverified account appearing to belong to Jeong, soon after the Gray Lady announced she was joining the rag.

The Times issued a statement Thursday saying they reviewed her social media history and since finding nothing negative about women, people of color or the LGBTQ community or any other intersectional group of privilege, [Mexicans, little people, Muslims or illegal immigrants] they were going ahead with the hiring.

"We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done . . . her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers," the Times unashamedly said in a statement. "She regrets it, and the Times does not condone it.

So let me get this straight . . . if, say, a guy named Solomon Bernstein tweets: "South Korean hack, Sarah Jeong, writes like crap," she would have responded, "Oh boy, how I love to piss off the Jews" and the Times would be okay hiring her because she was responding in kind?

And how did she know on Twitter that her harassers were "old, white men"? That makes no sense unless she can come up with tweets where they reveal their ages, and melanin levels.

But not all of Jeong's "exceptional" work was about police and old white men--she wasn't too happy with all men in general and white women weren't her cup of tea.

The Times can say whatever they want and hire whomever they want, but let's not pretend they would have hired her if she made racist remarks about the acceptable groups the left holds dear.

Jeong tweeted in 2016 that  "dumbass f***ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants." She also called "old white men" "lemmings" and said that white people will "go extinct soon" using the hashtag "CancelWhitePeople.

So please don't try passing that crap off as 'imitating the rhetoric' of the harassment she experienced.

"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins, she wrote in 2014. She also added a graph claiming that "whiteness" results in being "awful."

Hard to believe that generalizing to her harassers by globalizing all white people in such racist terms, makes it impossible to believe that she was merely responding to the harassing rhetoric she received.

Oh, and wouldn't it be nice to actually see the 'harassment' she has faced as a dumbass so-called journalist?

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

BOMBSHELL: Comey's leaked memos contained classified info

Oh, Comey's going to be in soooo much trouble. 

The former FBI Director James Comey is being accused by the President of illegally leaking classified information to his 'friend' at Columbia University who was then told to leak it to the New York Times, which he did.  

More than half of the Comey memos detailed Russia-related conversations with President Trump.

The Hill reported overnight that Comey wrote a total of seven memos describing his conversations with Trump on the Russia case, and four of the memos had markings indicating they contained classified material at the "secret" or "confidential" level. The information obtained by The Hill was supplied by "officials familiar with the documents."

The memos were recently shown to Congress, according to the report, and the FBI claimed they were all government documents, despite Comey, "the-Boy Scout's"saying they were personal.

President Trump booted up his presidential computer and tweeted: "This is so illegal!" using his signature exclamation point.

If President Trump is correct, then James Comey will be going to prison. . .

Where he will be visited by a unicorn ridden by Kim Jong Un. 

Comey's "illegal" release of classified memos will likely receive the same treatment that Hillary Clinton received for her illegal email server. The claims in The Hill about Comey's memos are reminiscent of Hillary's, and the irony regarding who investigated her actions aren't lost on us.

There seems to be a 'special class' of individuals who can literally get away with murder . . . or, in this case, violation of the Espionage Act.




Tweet