Rep. Lauren Boebert performs bilateral orchiectomy with a dull blade on Yoel Roth formerly of Twitter

Don't let her sweet face fool you--she will cut your balls off and put them on display for the world to see. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) blasted former Twitter twits during the congressional hearing over the exposure of the Twitter files.

The feisty congresswoman was exposing Yoel Roth, the former head of Twitter's oxymoron known as Trust and Safety, and also Vijaya Gadde, the former chief legal officer at Twitter. Boebert was addressing the issue of unfair [aka unconstitutional] censorship toward conservatives. She asked these two scumcrumpets if they had ever shadow banned her in particular.

Shadow banning, also called stealth banning, ghost banning and comment ghosting, is defined by Dictionary.com as: a practice used in online moderation that consists of preventing a user’s content from being seen by others—either partially or totally—without the user being notified or aware of it. This is typically done as a consequence of violating a platform’s rules.

But in Twitter's case, they own the sandbox and make up the rules as they go along--even when there are no rule violations.

Both Roth and Gadde denied ever having shadowbanned Boebert, but she was prepared for the lying denial. She checked her notes and explained that there absolutely was interference with her account as she was provided with proof of that fact by Twitter's new leadership.

“Well, let me refresh your memory,” Boebert began. “On March 12, 2021, Mr. Roth, I know you looked at it because fascist Twitter 1.0 had a public interest exceptions policy which means for members of Congress to be shadowbanned, it had to go before you, Mr. Roth. So I’ll ask again: Did you shadow-ban my account? Yes or no?”

Roth made a second denial as his tiny testicles ascended in self-protection, but there was no real denying it as the cat was out of the bag, thanks to Elon Musk’s staff. 

She had the information that they had indeed shadow banned her and that she made a simple joke about Hillary Clinton being angry because she couldn’t rig her election. 

Roth’s response, according to the information provided to Boebert by the Musk crew, was to place a 90-day filter on her account so she couldn’t be found in searches and prevented notification for non-followers.

“This is considered an aggressive visibility filter,” said Boebert. “You silenced members of congress from communicating with their constituents. You silenced me from communicating with the American people over a freaking joke.”

“Who the hell do you think you are?” she asked.

Testicles continued to climb as Boebert continued to tongue-lash the former Twitter execs, showing what they did was clearly election interference. She also blasted them for suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story and the banning of a United States President.

Boebert noted that they thought they were safe under Section 230, but she reminded them that this protection was for publishers, not editors and that the former staff of Twitter was acting as editors BECAUSE THEY WERE EDITING!

Boebert ended her fusillade of facts saying that she was angry, not for herself, but for the American people they had silenced.

“I am angry for the millions of Americans who were silenced because of your decisions, because of your actions, because of your collusion with the federal government,” said Boebert. “They can’t reach out to Elon. They can’t sit here today and hold you in account.”

Twitter shadow-banned millions of conservatives, including myself! They must be held accountable. pic.twitter.com/i5360gXPzl

— Rep. Lauren Boebert (@RepBoebert) February 8, 2023

During these hearings, Roth claimed he was “surprised” by the visibility filters put on elected officials, but Musk revealed that claim to be absolutely false seeing as how Roth placed many of them there himself.

Yoel Roth is a fake as the giant prosthetic breasts of the Ontario shop teacher. But by now, Roth must be singing in falsetto.

Tweet

Now that the 2020 election is over, ex-Twitter safety chiefs fesses up

Ex-Twitter safety chief, Yoel Roth, spoke with journalist Kara Swisher about the then pre-free speech social media site, specifically focused on the company's decision to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020. He confessed that it was a "mistake," making it sound like a simple math error in subtraction rather than the manipulation of a presidential election.

During the interview, Roth said that despite concerns about the veracity of the laptop story, it did not reach a point where he wanted to remove the content—which was later censored anyway. It was first reported that Roth blocked the user's ability to access the October 2020 story, but he claimed that the decision wasn't up to him but didn't mention who made the decision (which may have come from the same person who went balls-to-the-wall with the Russian disinformation story that was in itself, disinformation).

"We didn’t know what to believe, we didn’t know what was true, there was smoke—and ultimately for me, it didn’t reach a place where I was comfortable removing this content from Twitter," Roth said. "But it set off every single one of my finely tuned APT28 hack and leak campaign alarm bells."

Funny how censorship on social media only works in one direction, but now that Elon is at the Twitter helm, the left is having a cow.

Roth repeatedly reiterated that despite Big Tech companies' high-alert status and his personal feeling of responsibility to protect the "integrity of conversations" from foreign governments attempting to interfere in elections, it never rose to the level where he believed the story should be censored, which again calls into question as to who was the decision maker at the time.

"But—so it was a mistake?" Swisher asked.

"In my opinion, yes," he responded, pretending to be unbiased.

Roth planned to meet with the Department of Homeland Security’s now-defunct and anti-free speech Disinformation Governance Board, where the government was expected to ask Twitter to become more involved in efforts to monitor 'misinformation,' as determined by the Democrat Party.

Both Roth and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed they were approached by the FBI prior to the 2020 election, warning the platforms about foreign propaganda and misinformation. "You got a nice website here--it would be a shame if something were to happen to it."

So when the New York Post reported on Hunter Biden's laptop, just weeks before the 2020 election, both Facebook and Twitter quickly blocked the story from being shared on their platforms in an incredibly well-coordinated anti-free speech move.

Now that Joe Biden is wandering the halls of the White House, it was safe for former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to admit that his platform was wrong to intervene in the Hunter Biden laptop story, which turned out to be true. 

Nobody has since apologized to the New York Post for blocking their reporting.

Still, the left is going after Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter who has since reinstated accounts that had originally been removed, such as our former President Donald Trump and the Babylon Bee, a conservative satire publication. Now that Musk is in charge of Twitter, he said that he might release more information regarding the company's past censorship, and this is scaring the crap out of the left.

Let's not forget how the legacy media and Big Tech labeled the laptop as Russian disinformation and published it knowing it wasn't vetted. Along with that, about fifty FBI and other former intelligence heads also signed a letter stating they believed the story that it was part of Putin's disinformation campaign.

There are currently many news organizations that have independently verified the laptop as authentic because the election is history.

Tweet