AOC lied, 4 died and they had voted for Trump

Failed math: "simple addition is racist"

Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (socialist-NY) claims that the January 6th "terror attack" left almost 10 people dead but admits she wasn't a math person. Almost 10 = 9 or perhaps 8, but it turns out that 4 people died in the "terror attack" that ended up with all of the victims being former Trump voters.

Admittedly, the idiots who entered the Capitol were engaged in a politically motivated riot, but out of the masses of people involved, a significantly small minority actually entered the building, while far away at a safe location AOC believed her life was in danger and communism would never come to America because of it. 

The evidence of the "terror attack" does not support AOC's claim that it was a terrorist attack. She may have been able to hear the shot fired that killed the unarmed Ashli Babbitt, a military veteran who was entering the Capitol Building, but she was blocks away and was in no danger being accidentally killed by a Capitol Police officer.

Nobody in the crowd carried a weapon except for the Capitol police and Babbitt was the only person killed by a weapon. 

But for Rep. Obviously-Comatose, facts don't matter as she tweeted on Sunday her ditzy take on Jan. 6.

The socialist math wizard came up with the number "almost 10" by including the deaths of people who died from reasons having nothing to do with the actual Capitol Hill riots. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

There were 4 deaths of any significance in regard to Jan. 6, not "almost 10." Every one of those four dead were pro-Trump demonstrators:

Brian Kevin Greeson, 55, and Ben Phillips, 50, both died of heart attacks. Roseanne Boyland, 34, died of "acute amphetamine intoxication." And as mentioned, Ashli Babbitt, 35, was murdered by a Metro cop.

The "almost 10" deaths AOC speaks of is the fake news stories by The New York Times and The Associated Press. The forwarded the false claim that Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by the pro-Trump mob--hit over the head with a fire extinguisher.

Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died at the hands of the mob that besieged the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, will lie in honor next week in the building’s Rotunda. Sicknick was hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the riot. https://t.co/GiS7nueVoe

— The Associated Press (@AP) January 30, 2021

Bull crap. 

In reality, Washington’s medical examiner found the officer had suffered two strokes on Jan. 7 — the day after the riot — and had died of natural causes totally unrelated to the previous day’s events.

But the leftists media outlets and even President Biden himself have all forwarded the claim that Sicknick was murdered on Jan. 6.

In her fuzzy math, AOC attempted to also include Capitol police who committed suicide that occurred months after Jan. 6. According to Reuters, four officers who responded to the Jan. 6 riot have since killed themselves and we don't know that their motives had anything to do with the riot.

So the AOC math genius added 4 [suicides] + 4 [dead Trump supporters] + 1 [Brian Sicknick] = "almost 10." Brilliant! 

And calling what happened on Jan. 6 an "insurrection" is as accurate as AOC's math. The size of the group going into a building without weapons, sitting in the Speaker's chair, wearing horns, and carrying no weapons is about as much an insurrection as 4 = 9. 

Tweet

DC top cop gets no confidence vote after newly appointed

Acting US Capitol Police Chief Yoganada Pittman replaced former Chief Steven Sund after his resignation resulting from the January 6th Capitol incursion. [H/T CBS News]

In spite of the fact that Pittman fits the intersectional victimhood criteria as a woman of color, she received a no confidence vote in her inherited role. 

The U.S. Capitol Police Labor Committee, which represents Capitol Police officers, announced that 92 percent of those participating in a recent ballot voted that they had no confidence in Pittman, as reported by CBS News. Other top leaders also received a no confidence vote after the Capitol incursion.

“Capitol Police offers have delivered an overwhelming vote of No Confidence in the senior leadership of the U.S. Capitol Police,” the union said in a news release.

“The Executive Board of the Capitol Police Union called for rank-and-file members to consider a vote of no confidence late last week following the senior leadership’s mishandling of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th,” the union said. “The board took this unprecedented step after reviewing details of the events on, and leading up to, January 6th and the subsequent deaths of 6 people, and injuries to approximately 140 Capitol and Metropolitan Police officers.”

“[O]ur leadership clearly failed us. We know because we were there,” union chairman Gus Papathanasiou said in a statement, according to CBS News.

“The past week of the impeachment trial showed members of Congress and the entire country, devastating details of the violence that Capitol Police officers faced during the insurrection,” Papathanasiou said, according to Fox News. “It was the darkest day in the history of the department.”

Papathanasiou said there are leaders within the department who are better suited for leadership than Pittman and the rest of the current leadership team.

“We hope Congressional leaders and the entire Capitol Hill community understands that continuing with the current USCP leadership is not an option,” he said.

“The current leadership is just a continuation of the past regimes on this Department and there needs to be accountability. Their failures are inexcusable. This vote, which the majority of the officers in the bargaining unit participated in, shows they have lost our trust. The anger in this department is widespread and the trust that has been broken it is not going to be regained.”

Pittman has said the department knew before the pro-Trump rally that took place Jan. 6 that the demonstration would not be a typical protest. Democrats accused then-President Donald Trump of “inciting an insurrection” with his speech that day, but that wasn't true if you listened to his words.

It isn't clear, however, how much they knew and when they knew it and is the subject of a letter from House Republicans to Speaker Nancy "Frenetic Hands" Pelosi, according to Fox News.

The letter was submitted by House Administration Committee Ranking Member Rodney Davis of Illinois, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan of Ohio, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member James Comer of Kentucky and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes of California. 

It seeks to understand what was done about Sund’s early warning about the Jan. 6 rally.

Sund said that on January 4th, he approached the House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving asking for National Guard support but Irving seemed more concerned about "the optics" of a Guard deployment and didn't believe the "intelligence supported it."

Now we have thousands of National Guard troops at the Capitol for an interminable amount of time before Pelosi has them relieved of their post and return home to their families and jobs.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

CNN lawyer doesn't know the First Amendment due to TDS

Jennifer Rodgers, the Comedy News Network's so-called legal analyst, apparently understands the U.S. Constitution to the same degree a spitting cockroach understands Einstein's theory of relativity in its application to the existence of black holes.

Rodgers spoke during a discussion about this week's scheduled Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump and attempted to discredit Trump's lawyer's legal argument that impeaching someone who is no longer in office is "unconstitutional." The grounds, the Left is using stems from Trump's Jan. 6 remarks at a rally which preceded the Capitol riot, which his lawyer says is protected by his First Amendment right to free speech.

"Yeah, those are wrong," Rodgers pontificated about that argument. "I mean, you don't have a First Amendment right to lie. You don't have a First Amendment right to put people in danger. And he did both of those things."

Bong! Rodgers is wrong. 

While you don't have the right to call for violence and put people in danger, you sure as hell have the right to lie. CNN and the rest of us do it all the time. This isn't about truth in advertising, which is a totally different animal; it's about having the right to say what you want to say as long as it doesn't call for violence or put people in danger, such as yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater.

And Trump was crystal clear before the protest when he called for a "peaceful" and "patriotic" protest. Most people at the rally were, in fact, peaceful and were not calling for a coup [an overthrow of government] but were calling for the government to look into the election proceedings that seemed questionable. 

The idiots that were rioting were outliers and nobody on the right, outside of they themselves, support what they did, in spite of how the Left is trying to put all conservatives, libertarians and Trump supporters in the same category.

For now, all we can do is pray for Reps. Alexandria Obviously-Callow (D-Twitter) and Rashida "Aunty Semitic" Tlaib (D-MI) who, while they were nowhere near the action at the Capitol, nevertheless believe they deserve the role of victim in order to forward their agenda, an agenda they laughingly call democracy.

Please consider subscribing to this free blog, Brain Flushings, and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help feed my backyard squirrel and help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Lix Cheney censured for her impeachment vote

The Republican Party Central Committee in Carbon County, Wyoming, has unanimously voted to censure Rep. Liz Cheney (D-WY) after she voted to impeach President Trump. 

[H/T The Daily Wire.]

“The censure resolution passed in a unanimous vote by the 45-member central committee,” The Washington Times reported. “It included a demand that Ms. Cheney appear before the committee to explain her actions.”

Carbon County Chairman Joey Correnti IV told the Times: “Our representative did not represent our voice.”  Thus she failed the Party by going rogue.

The resolution says Cheney defied the will of most Wyoming Republican voters when she voted in favor of the Democrats’ rushed impeachment article, denying President Trump due process.

Due process of the law is the idea that a person is presumed innocent until proved guilty, a process revered by Republicans and shunned by many on the left.

“The wind in Wyoming has been horrendous today—with gusts up to 65 miles per hour. That is nothing compared to the whirlwind created by Representative Cheney’s announcement that she would be voting to impeach President Trump, and her subsequent follow-through of doing just that,” the party said in a statement, to The Daily Wire. 

“There has not been a time during our tenure when we have seen this type of an outcry from our fellow Republicans, with the anger and frustration being palpable in the comments we have received. Our telephone has not stopped ringing, our email is filling up, and our website has seen more traffic than at any previous time. The consensus is clear that those who are reaching out to the Party vehemently disagree with Representative Cheney’s decision and actions.”

“This insurrection caused injury, death and destruction in the most sacred space in our Republic,” Cheney herself said in a statement last Tuesday, blaming the President for the behavior of others.

“Much more will become clear in coming days and weeks, but what we know now is enough,” she continued. “The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack.”

Except the siege of the Capitol was planned prior to Trump's speech about a "peaceful, patriotic" protest [Trump's words].

“Everything that followed was his doing [unlike the time when a gunman was inspired by Sen. Bernie Sanders (Communist-VT) to shoot Republicans at a ballgame and nearly killed Sen. Steve Scalise]. None of this would have happened without the President. The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. [This part is true, but you cannot blame him for what others did unless he specifically directed them to do it.] There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution.”

“I will vote to impeach the President,” she announced, before all the facts were available.

Last Monday, House Democrats released their single article of impeachment against President Trump for allegedly inciting what they claimed was an “insurrection” at the Capitol.

Again, no Republican, no conservative, and no independent voter who voted for Trump believes the attack on the Capitol was anything but horrible. But Democrats always try to lump all Trump supporters in the same category, like Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables" categorization of all his supporters. 

And Liz Cheney gave the left exactly what they want.

Trump's words at the speech were: 

“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Today, we will see whether Republicans stand strong for the integrity of our elections.”

These words sound very typical of how political people speak and they clearly do not call for violence or insurrection.

I believe Liz Cheney voted her conscience but I also believe she needs to be voted out of office in the next primary election.

Finally, please consider subscribing to my free blog, Brain Flushings. I can be satirical, sometimes angry, and generally fair. Sometimes I can even be funny--at least to myself and hopefully you. The only ways I get paid is by knowing I've made a difference in the world and also when you click on one of the ads on the page. Just one click does the trick.

Tweet

Left-wing anarchist arrested for inciting Capitol riot

Utah resident and left-wing anarchist John Sullivan, 26, was arrested by the FBI and DOJ for inciting a riot inside the U.S. Capitol. There is video evidence of him agitating the crowd and encouraging violence. He obviously was not inspired to do this by President Trump, but perhaps was trying to have fun because anarchists just wanna have fuh-un, yes anarchist just wanna have fun.

Based on public information and information provided by Sullivan in a January 7, 2021 interview, Sullivan is the leader of InsurgenceUSA, a group that organizes leftist protests.

Back in July 13, 2020, the scumcrumpet Sullivan was charged with rioting and criminal mischief by local law enforcement in Provo Utah in regard to a violent protest on June 30th of that year in which a civilian was shot and injured. The case is still pending.

There is another video which seems to have been removed from YouTube that shows a protest in Washington, D.C. where Sullivan is seen telling the crowd over a microphone “we about to burn this s**t down,” “we got to rip Trump out of office . . . f**king pull him out of that s**t . . . we ain’t waiting until the next election . . . we about to go get that motherf***er.” 

Sullivan then can be seen leading the crowd in a chant of, “it’s time for a revolution.”

Finally after the last barricade was breached, Sullivan and others approach the Capitol Building and the scumbag is heard at various points in the video: “There are so many people. Let’s go. This s**t is ours! F**k yeah,” “We accomplished this s**t. We did this together. F**k yeah! We are all a part of this history,” and “Let’s burn this s**t down.”

But as mentioned above, YouTube does not want you to see how the Left "protests," and they removed the video.

Now let me be clear: most of the rioters appear to be Trump supporters and they do not in any way represent Trump's majority nor condone the Capitol breach. Many also agree that Trump should have immediately diffused the situation if he could, but he is no more responsible for it than Bernie Sanders supporters are for the baseball field shooting by one of his supporters that nearly killed Steve Scalise.

It's disgusting that some on the left say that all of us who voted for Trump should have known what was going to happen. Ridiculous. They also say that those of us who voted for him are white supremacists and Nazis. 

Does that mean that since some pedophiles watch Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Anderson Cooper  that these hosts are pedophiles? 

Using Lemon logic it would be so.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Clowns at Comedy News Network see good riots vs. bad riots

The two half-wits at CNN just don't add up. Together, adding both halves, you'd think they'd make a full-wit, but no, they're still nitwit half-wits.

Comedy News Network's (CNN) hosts Don LeMon and Chris "Fredo" Cuomo believe that there are good riots and bad riots, it all depends on which side of the political aisle you're on.  

Somehow these cretins believe that Black Lives Matter and Antifa destroying public and private property, burning and destroying businesses, attacking non-rioters including Andy Ng, a reporter, is justified, while rioting as a Trump supporter should be punishable by death or something far worse. Sure, I'm exaggerating, but only slightly.

Speaking with Ken Cuccinelli on his "leftist light" show Tuesday night, Fredo posited that trying to overturn an election is “different than being pissed off about being shot by the cops.”

He apparently believes that breaking department store windows and stealing TVs is justified when someone who wasn't there, and doesn't care, uses the shooting, justified or not, as an excuse. This has to mean that Chris Cuomo is actually the dumber Cuomo brother, but all the results are not in.

If you don't think Cuomo is a schmuck, then you're not up on your Yiddish.

Later, when passing the schmuck baton off to Don LeMon for the night, the two CNN hosts tried to convince their viewer or two on how the riots do not compare.

“That was a very important interview. And listen, I’m glad you mentioned about being shot by cops because you cannot compare. And I’m sick of people comparing. You can’t compare what happened this summer to what happened at the Capitol. It’s two different things,” said LeMon, trying to look intelligent.

“One is built on people, on racial justice, on criminal justice, right, on reform, on police not beating up – or police treating people of color differently than they do whites. Okay? That is not a lie. Those are facts. Go look at them. What happened at the Capitol was built on a lie perpetrated by the president and the people who support him,” he continued. “So, just on that one merit, if you want to call it, it’s not comparable. That things are not comparable. So they should not be doing it. And stop this whataboutism.”

Of course, they didn't mention the innocent victims in all riots. But if I mention it now, they call it whataboutism. Innocent victims are not only comparable, they are measurable. You can count the number of people victimized by both the Capitol breach riots and all the riots over the summer that resulted in billions of dollars in damage, loss of livelihoods and lives, but with the blessings of some folks on the left like Kamala Harris, Ayanna Pressley, Maxine Waters, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [aka Alexandria Obviously-Commie] and others who either refused to condemn the BLM and Antifa rioting or condoned it with excuses.

Fredo even said that whenever conservatives bring up the BLM riots they mean to say that they “do not care” about what happened at the Capitol last week. 

That's total bull crap. No conservatives believe the Capitol riots were okay. None. But conservatives call for law and order in all cases--that's what makes us conservatives, you dolts. It isn't "apples to oranges" as LeMon claimed. It's riots to riots.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Capitol Police requested DC Nat'l Guard assistance prior to riots but it was denied

According to Fox News, the FBI visited known Trump extremists and urged them not to attend the Capitol protest in Washington, D.C. They along with the NYFD warned them of possible riots, but the warning was as useful as teaching a catfish to shave.

Steven Sund was the U.S. Capitol Police chief during the deadly riots last Wednesday, but he has since resigned. Prior to the protests and riots he reportedly asked his supervisors for permission to request the D.C. National Guard to be on standby in case the protests escalated. 

Sund's request was denied. He revealed this in an interview with the Democratic newspaper The Washington Post.

"If we would have had the National Guard we could have held them at bay longer, until more officers from our partner agencies could arrive," Sund said, and described how the riots of January 6th might have turned out differently.

The Washington Post reports that on the Monday before the riot, Sund asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request the Guard be placed on standby in case he needed hasty backup.

But the House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving argued that he was uncomfortable with the "optics" of such a move. [It is unknown Irving's comfort level with the "optics" of the riots.]
 

Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger told Sund that he should informally reach out to his contacts at the Guard and ask them to "lean forward" and be on alert, he told the outlet.

Sund followed Stenger’s advice and called the head of the D.C. National Guard that night, who allegedly told him he believed he could get 125 personnel to the scene quickly if needed. 

The police chief then briefed Irving and Stenger on that information Tuesday and Stenger said the backup – which also included the Metropolitan Police Department offering to potentially lend a hand -- seemed sufficient, according to Sund’s interview with the soft-news, hard-Left Washington Post.

Since the cluster-fritz of a riot went down, Irving and Stenger also resigned from their posts and are salting fries and burgers at McDonald's.

The D.C. National Guard finally arrived when the coast was fairly clear at 5:40 p.m., or 1740 for you ex-military or European folks. By that time, four people had died, security was breached, and AOC was having a cow.

Pentagon officials said last week that Capitol Police never requested D.C. National Guard backup before Wednesday and later made an urgent request as the pro-Trump mob was about to breach the Capitol building, the newspaper adds.

"We rely on Capitol Police and federal law enforcement to provide an assessment of the situation," Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said. "And based on that assessment that they had, they believed they had sufficient personnel and did not make a request."

And these are the folks who protect our leaders.

Sund told former newspaper The Washington Post, that now he believes the suspected pipe bombs found in D.C. the same day as the breach, were deliberately placed as a way to draw police away from the Capitol building, and it worked like chum in a swimming pool of hungry sharks.

"As soon as they hit the fence line, the fight was on," Sund told the newspaper. "Violent confrontations from the start. They came with riot helmets, gas masks, shields, pepper spray, fireworks, climbing gear -- climbing gear! -- explosives, metal pipes, baseball bats. I have never seen anything like it in 30 years of events in Washington."

In other words, they learned from Antifa and BLM, and honestly, my first thought when I heard the news about the rioting was that it was those two groups of anarchists doing the breach. I was wrong, although some of the rioters may have been from the left.

The Capitol Police has since been facing well-earned, bipartisan criticism for its mishandling of the riots.

But to their credit, the USCP was able to escort 99 Senators, Vice President Pence, journalists [it's unknown whether Jim Acosta was among the so-called journalists, but if he had been, watch out rioter--he would have taken yiz all on] out of the Senate Chamber to safety before it all went downhill.

However, lawmakers are frustrated that they haven’t been given a full explanation as to why the situation became as dire as it did.

Perhaps Jim Acosta can fill us in on the scoop.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Tenn. rioter allegedly seen in Senate Chamber with zip ties: held without bond

The breach of the Capitol and Senate Chamber last Wednesday was disgusting and unconscionable. Conservatives are consistent in that belief, while leftists forgave the rioters over the summer who burned, looted and destroyed private property and businesses and also causing grave bodily harm to many individuals.

What happened Wednesday, however, ought never to happen again.

One guy from Tennessee, an alleged rioter and insurrectionist who stormed the Capitol and entered the Senate Chamber had brought along plastic restraints, implying the possibility that he was planning to kidnap Senators and/or other personnel. He was ordered held in police custody Monday.

The Nashville anarchist in question, Eric Munchel, 30, known as the "zip tie guy," appeared before a federal judge, and was held without bond pending further hearings. He is one of two rioters who had restraints with them in the chaos going on around them in the Capitol building, where Trump supporters were rioting. The other rioter caught is Larry Rendell Brock who was arrested in Texas on Sunday.

Munchel faces charges of knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building on grounds without lawful authority, and one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. 

Since there was no kidnapping, he cannot be charged for that crime.

Eric Munchel is believed to be a man photographed [see above] carrying zip ties into the Senate Chamber during last week's riot, the FBI said.

Prosecutors asked that he remain in custody pending extradition to Washington, D.C.

The FBI said photos of someone believed to be Munchel was carrying the restraints, an item in a holster on his right hip and a cellphone mounted to his chest with a camera facing outward.

"In my experience, flex cuffs are used by law enforcement to restrain and/or detain subjects," FBI agent Carlos Fontanez wrote in an affidavit.

Munchel has not been charged in connection with allegedly using the zip ties because he apparently didn't get the opportunity.

Law enforcement encountered Munchel at a Washington, D.C. hotel the day of the Capitol breach. They observed him carrying a "Taser Pulse," a device that emits electrical shock. He claimed he had it with him for self-protection at the Trump rally.

According to authorities, he attended the rally with a woman who was also pictured with him inside the Capitol, they said. Their relationship was not disclosed.

A hearing on Munchel's case is scheduled for today Tuesday.

"I want to remind you that it's very important that you communicate with them (attorneys) about your case. You need to speak openly and freely with them," U.S. Magistrate Judge Chip Frensley told him, according to the newspaper. "You don't talk to them and communicate with them, it's real hard for them to represent you. We have challenges in the COVID era, and they're going to work through those things, and I need to work with them so that they can do everything they can to represent you."

It is highly doubtful that Kamala Harris or any other Democrat will post bail for him if it is permitted after the hearing, as they did for Antifa and BLM thugs.

Stay tuned to this blog for more as the story develops--if they don't censor my free speech.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

AOC : "Close to half of the House nearly dying" in Capitol breach

If Democrats in general, and socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) in particular, had no double-standards, they'd have no standards at all. The young leftist believes that the point of protests, when the ones protesting are in agreement with her politics, is to "make people uncomfortable."

But Sandy Cortez only applies that "logic" to those on the left who have rioted, looted, burned and even killed people in violent protests.

On Sunday, in response to the unacceptable attempted breach of the Capitol, she sang a different tune. Blaming the disgusting behavior of pro-Trump supporters, and perhaps others who merely pretended to support the President, the congresswoman blamed Trump for the behavior of those people and said that he should be removed from office.

No excuses can be made for the people who rioted. No excuse can be made for the President who did nothing to quell the attempted breach and stop the violence. But you don't blame a parent for their offspring who commits a crime and you don't blame a person who did not actually call for a riot.

The left has made hypocrisy an art form. 

I know of no conservatives who were accepting of the Capitol riot last Wednesday. We don't condone violence nor any form of rioting. We do condone peaceful protests and make no excuses for either side that goes beyond that. 

The left refuses to see the violence perpetrated by their side as wrong and interpret it as righteous frustration.

The freshman socialist, who never had an original thought, quoted Tom Clancy's book on ABC News, saying that Trump is a "clear and present danger." 

“If we allow insurrection against the United States with impunity, with no accountability, we are inviting it to happen again. That is how serious it is,” AOC said.

“We came close to half of the House nearly dying on Wednesday,” she exaggerated, adding, “And if … another head of state came in and ordered an attack on the United States Congress, would we say that that should not be prosecuted? Would we say that there should be absolutely no response to that? No.”

And "no" means "no," except when it's BLM or Antifa doing the rioting.

“It is an act of insurrection, it’s an act of hostility, and we must have accountability because without it, it will happen again,” she said mostly through her nasal cavity.

It's amazing how the left has many people convinced that their side is the side of virtue and the conservatives are the evil doers. They are even calling for the resignation of Republicans in Congress who called for an investigation into the election process.

But they never called  out the riots over the summer.

And not the left is trying to stop free speech by conservatives. They have removed Parler from their app stores. They are kicking people [including the President of the United States] off Twitter, Facebook and other platforms. 

With Biden as President, and Harris waiting for him to leave one way or another, we are not going to get better before we get worse.

UPDATE: As I tried posting this on Parler, the site "cannot be reached." The left is trying to silence us and I don't know if they'll try to do that with this blog. 

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Shirtless man in horned helmet at Capitol identified: not Hunter Biden on crack

Not Hunter Biden on Crack

You may have seen him on TV during the Wednesday riots at the U.S. Capitol wearing a horny helmet and no shirt. Well, no shirt it was not Hunter Biden, so don't be saying it looked a lot like him and insinuating it was the President-elect's son of whom he is so proud.

It turns out the guy who did his thing on the dais fo the U.S. Senate has been identified as a QAnon believer and a regular at far-right rallies in Arizona.

But don't confuse far-right with conservatives, Republicans or Libertarians. They are more closely related to far left scumbags.

The guy is Jake Angeli, 32, who was seen posing in the chair occupied moments earlier by Vice President Mike Pence at the beginning of the election certification proceedings, until he and his colleagues had to leave due to the rioting, which had just gotten started.

The shirtless conspiracy guy – known as the "Q Shaman" – wore red, white and blue face paint and brandished a spear from which hung an American flag.

QAnon is a group of conspiracy theorists who believe that a huge network of powerful people are behind an enormous pedophile ring, including the viral "pizzagate" conspiracy that falsely claimed a pedophile ring ran in a pizza shop in Washington, D.C.

So breathe easy, Hunter. Now that Daddy's confirmed, you have nothing to sweat except perhaps child support, or when you're looking for that guy who gets you the thing.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Narcissistic WV lawmaker records himself rioting at Capitol

You have to be an idiot or so narcissistic that you don't realize that what you're doing is being an idiot. A West Virginia Republican Delegate Derrick Evans videoed himself and fellow rioters as they were storming the U.S. Capitol Wednesday. He later deleted it from his social media account but not before being outed by the public and calls for his resignation came in.

The video shows him wearing a helmet 

A West Virginia state lawmaker recorded video of himself and fellow supporters of President Donald Trump storming the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, triggering calls for his resignation. In the video by Republican Delegate Derrick Evans, later deleted from his social media page, he is shown wearing a helmet and shouting at the door to breach the building after Congress met for an expected vote to affirm Joe Biden's election win.

"We're in! Keep it moving, baby!" he said to no baby in particular in the packed doorway. Along for the riot were apparent Trump supporters hold flags and complaining about how uncomfortable pepper spray makes them feel. 

Once inside, Evans could be seen on video wandering around the Capitol Rotunda, where historical paintings depict the republic's founding, and knowing his video would be going out to the world yelled "no vandalizing."

Lawmakers from other states also traveled to Washington, D.C. to protest the results of the Electoral College on Wednesday., but it's unclear if any other elected official forced their way into the U.S. Capitol because they weren't stupid enough to video themself and tweet or Instagram the sucker out.

Pennsylvania state Senator Doug Mastriano helped organize a bus ride to protest in Washington, D.C., and said he left the Capitol area after the eruption of violence, which he called "unacceptable." A Democratic colleague called for his resignation nonetheless because Mastriano is a Republican and his colleague is an ass.

In West Virginia, Democratic party leaders said Evans should resign and "be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." About 10,000 people have signed an online petition calling for him to be removed from office, a month after being sworn into a first term. 

He should resign based on his stupidity alone.

On Wednesday night he said in a statement on social media that he was returning to West Virginia and "was simply there as an independent member of the media to film history." Video shows him chanting President Trump's name before entering the Capitol building.

The more intelligent politicians such as Republican Senator Shelley Moore Capito strongly criticized the protest. "This is the United States of America," she said in a statement. "We don't do this. It's not who we are."

Sadly, it seems as if that is what we are becoming.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

Biden admits if Capitol was stormed by BLM, 'they'd have burned it to the ground'

Biden shows unity with the Ayatollah

Nobody was angrier than President-elect for real, this time, than Joseph Robinette Biden after the Capitol was overrun by what he called a 'riotous mob' of 'domestic terrorists.' "But they did a lousy job of rioting, no joke," Biden told Brain Flushings ace reporter Scoop Mierda del Toro.

"Trump's people riot like a bunch of Nancy boy pansies, if you ask me," he went on. "If my guys in Black Lives Matter or Antifa did the same rioting, the Capitol rotunda would be looking like a giant Frisbee laid out on the grass. I'm not joking.

"What did Trump's people do? They broke a few windows, scared a few politicians, but the damage they did was nothing compared to my troops. And no cop or other law enforcement official had the audacity to stop them.

"I mean, look at Portland. Look at Seattle. Look at New York. C'mon, man. The cops just stood by and watched the rioting, burning and looting because, not only were they told to stand down, they knew full well that if they stopped my guys, they would have been out of the force on their ear. I'm not kidding.

"And the best part is that I still got to be President-elect after all they tried to do to stop me. Trump supporters have no right to protest the way they did against federal property. It's a blow to our democracy."

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet