People go ballistic online after Minnesota paper praises Tim Walz's clemency for child sex offender

In the upside down world of progressive journalism, the Minnesota Star Tribune has decided that pardoning a child rapist is cause for celebration. Their columnist went out of her way to defend Governor Tim Walz for shielding an illegal alien who spent years assaulting a ten year old girl. The piece even tried to equate the crime with January 6 to make the whole thing seem reasonable.

Laura Ingraham and former Acting ICE Director Jonathan Fahey have spent plenty of time pointing out how Democrats handle illegal immigration and criminal justice these days. They keep running into cases where the rights of victims, especially children, get pushed aside while illegal aliens who commit serious crimes receive soft treatment.

One recent example involves a lenient sentence for an illegal alien truck driver in California. This Minnesota pardon fits right into that pattern.The paper's columnist, Rochelle Olson, wrote a section titled "Cheers to Gov. Tim Walz." She praised the governor and failed vice presidential candidate for refusing to back down from his vote.

The Minnesota Board of Pardons, made up of Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and Chief Justice Natalie Hudson, voted unanimously on June 10 to grant clemency to Tou Lue Vang. Vang is a Laotian national who between 2002 and 2004 repeatedly raped a child. He was set to be deported when the pardon came through. Olson noted that Vang needed only two of three votes but received unanimous support. She mentioned a letter from the victim to the pardon board that supported clemency. She left out the details that the victim was a minor and that the assaults happened multiple times over two years.

A spokesperson for the paper defended the decision by saying the Star Tribune regularly publishes a wide range of opinions across the political spectrum. In this case, the columnist simply agreed with a unanimous pardon by the Minnesota state board of pardons, including Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison and state Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson.To drive the point home, Olson compared Vang's crimes to January 6.

"Vang’s actions 20 years ago were awful, but so were the violent protests at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and those folks received presidential pardons," she wrote.

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer saw it differently. "The Minnesota Star Tribune is cheering on Tim Walz protecting an illegal alien monster who raped a 10 year old girl. No one should read this depraved rag. They are sick," he said on X.

Online reactions were swift and sharp.

Dennis Neale wrote, "The Star Tribune likens repeatedly raping a 10-year-old girl to protesting in the Capitol on Jan 6. You fluppin’ idiots."

Another commentator observed, "Minnesota’s largest paper actually figured out a way to shove January 6th into this as a way to excuse an illegal immigrant who sexually assaulted a child. One of the most insane things I’ve ever seen."

Dustin Grage called the column "Absolutely disgusting." Claremont Institute senior fellow Jeremy Carl captured the larger problem. "The degeneracy of the modern left would be impossible to exaggerate because it is impossible to exaggerate infinity." Nick Freitas added, "Every time I think I despise the main stream media enough, they triple their efforts."

None of the pardon board's work or the column's defense mattered in the end. On July 10, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the illegal alien had been deported to Laos anyway.

Rubio laid out the facts plainly. "Just weeks ago, a foreign child rapist was freed to once again endanger America's children after receiving a pardon from Minnesota Governor Tim Walz," he told Fox News Digital. "Tue Lue Vang admitted to committing heinous crimes against a 10-year-old girl in Minnesota. He attempted to pay his victim for her silence and dismissed his acts of child abuse as a 'minor thing.'"

"Just days before he was scheduled to be deported, the Minnesota Governor pardoned him, setting him free to endanger American families once again," Rubio continued. "That's why I terminated his legal status in the United States. Vang has now been removed from our country and will never pose a threat to any American ever again."

Walz was not finished defending his choice. Days after the deportation he asked, "Did that make us any safer? Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable? Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day?"

The question answers itself when the worst day in question involved years of raping a child. In the progressive mind, that apparently counts as something everyone should just move past, especially if the perpetrator is an illegal alien the government was ready to remove. The Star Tribune cheered the effort anyway. The rest of the country noticed the moral confusion and said so.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Feds investigating family who allegedly attacked conservative reporter at anti-ICE protest

Nothing says "peaceful protest" like an entire family deciding to assault a female journalist who had the audacity to film them in public, where expectations of privacy do not exist.

Federal investigations are underway after TPUSA reporter Savanah Hernandez was attacked by a family while filming an anti-ICE protest in Minneapolis over the weekend.

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon confirmed the Department of Justice and FBI investigations on Tuesday after the Ostroushko family clashed with Hernandez at the protest outside the Whipple Federal Building, a local ICE field office, and a detention facility. The Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office has reportedly arrested several people, three of them in connection with the alleged assault.

The three individuals arrested include Chris Ostroushko, his daughter Paige, and Paige’s boyfriend, Lorenzo Garcia, 20, Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office told conservative outlet The Daily Caller.

Chris and Garcia were arrested for obstruction with force, while Paige was arrested for disorderly conduct. Chris’s wife, Deyanna, was also identified on video confronting Hernandez but was not among those charged.

Hernandez caught several of the attacks on video, where she could clearly be seen being harassed and shoved by the protesters. Paige, a sophomore at University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, was shown blowing a whistle in Hernandez’s face before physically attacking Hernandez. [That seems like an assault to me.]

One video shows Chris pushing Hernandez to the ground.

In another video, the Ostroushko family is seen discussing the attack beforehand, in which Chris can be heard telling his daughter to “Blow the whistle right in her f*cking ear.” 

What a dad.

Chris Ostroushko was previously known to law enforcement, as Crime Watch Minneapolis reported that he was convicted of defrauding the state after he illegally received unemployment benefits of nearly $7,000 in the early 2000s.

In an interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on Monday, Hernandez said she believes the incident escalated because the protesters found out who she works for. 

“Since Charlie Kirk’s assassination, this is now the third time that people have come up to me . . .  figured out I work for TPUSA, and have made a point to confront me, to threaten me, to harass me, and now brutally assault me, to prove a point. I’m scared to report, Laura,” Hernandez admitted. “This is my job. It’s what I’ve been doing for the last six years.”

“I can’t even interview people properly on the street because I get brutally assaulted and pushed to the ground by a 250-pound man for simply going and reporting on anti-ICE activities,” she added.

It sounds as if they have something to hide.

“For far too long, the violent left has been allowed to get away with repeated attacks on journalists,” Hernandez posted to X. “I’m looking forward to justice being served after what happened yesterday.”

Border czar Tom Homan echoed Hernandez on the show with Ingraham, “We cannot give up on this. We have to keep prosecuting these people . . .  We cannot accept this as a norm in the United States of America.”

Clearly, this is what happens when the left's tolerance mob realizes the rules don't apply to them anymore. A dad, his daughter, and her boyfriend turning a "protest" into a family bonding exercise by roughing up a female reporter on camera. And now the feds are involved because apparently some people still think this kind of thuggery is how you win hearts and minds in America.

The left has spent years pretending their side doesn't do violence, but videos like this keep ruining the narrative. Time for actual consequences instead of the usual slap on the wrist and a return to the streets.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, you can Buy Me A Coffee or click on the ads alongside this page--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Homan Vows to Expose Lefty Agitators: Reveals New Plan to 'Make Them Famous'

White House Border Czar Tom Homan just dropped the kind of line that makes red-meat conservatives want to stand up and cheer. He told Laura Ingraham on Fox that he's pushing the Trump team to build a database of the street radicals who think harassing ICE agents is a personality trait. His words? Straight fire.

"These people who want to say 'follow ICE' and 'film ICE,' you know what, you can protest, they have that right," Homan said. "But when you cross that line ... if you interfere or impede (with) some ICE officer, you will be prosecuted."

"And one thing I'm preaching for right now, Laura, we're going to create a database," he continued. "People that are arrested for interference and impeding, assault, we're gonna make them famous."

"We're going to put their face on TV. We're going to let their employers and their neighborhoods and their schools know who these people are."

Inject that directly into my veins, please, we need more of this.

Here are a few of the fine upstanding citizens we're talking about, the ones who apparently think pointing cameras at federal officers is the height of civic engagement.

Homan chuckled as he pointed out the obvious: a lot of these heroes are probably calling in sick to their day jobs. "A lot of these people, they say they're taking time off work to protest—I betcha a lot of them are calling in sick," he said. "I bet you a lot of their employers don't know what they're doing."

"But we're going to make sure everybody knows who they are."

Can't wait for the moment these brave souls start scrambling to put their masks back on after spending years mocking law enforcement for wearing them. The irony is so thick you could spread it on toast.

Speaking of masks and hypocrisy, take a look at these masked marvels who suddenly discover the value of anonymity when the consequences come knocking.

This all kicked off because Tampon Tim Walz decided to pour more gasoline on the fire. The governor posted a video egging on the mob to "film ICE agents" so they "can create a database of these atrocities against Minnesotans ... to bank evidence for future prosecutions."Homan's response: two can play that game, Governor. And we're better at it.

And the man himself, Tom Homan, who clearly isn't in the mood for any more poppycock.

Whether the administration actually follows through on the "make them famous" plan remains to be seen. But why not? If you're getting arrested for impeding federal officers, your mug deserves the same viral treatment you tried to give ICE.

President Trump already warned Walz on Truth Social: "If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of ICE, who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT."

Homan called it "certainly an option. A viable option." He added, "I think it's something that needs to be on the table because this cannot continue. There is going to be more bloodshed. I'm telling you. I hope I'm wrong ... There's going to be more bloodshed if something isn't done."

The Democrats' outrage machine runs on exactly that: more chaos, more headlines, more fundraising, more calling those who disagree with them 'racists'. They don't want calm. They want blood and ballots.

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, and check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free.

So yeah, Homan will be meeting with Trump. Maybe they'll talk databases. Maybe Insurrection Act. Maybe both.

One thing is for sure: the lefty agitators who thought doxxing ICE was cute are about to find out how it feels when the spotlight swings the other way.

Famous? Oh, they're gonna be famous.

Tweet

Boasberg's Reign of Terror on the Bench Could Be Coming to a Screeching Halt as GOP Rep Drops Impeachment Hammer

Oh, the sweet sound of accountability finally catching up to a partisan hack in a black robe. Leftist poster boy Judge James Boasberg is learning the hard way that you can't just play fast and loose with the Constitution forever without someone swinging back. Texas Rep. Brandon Gill (R-26), who's reportedly gearing up to file articles of impeachment against this clown in the fallout from the latest bombshell on Biden's dystopian spy op, Operation Arctic Frost.

Fresh off a chat with Fox News' Laura Ingraham, Florida Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19) spilled the beans that his Texas counterpart Gill is knee-deep in paperwork to boot Boasberg, who moonlights as chief judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., right out of his cushy gig. This all blew up after this week's gut-punch reveal: a whopping 197 subpoenas targeting conservative heavyweights and everyday Americans in Biden's fever-dream surveillance scheme via Operation Arctic Frost.

Exhibit A is a sneaky subpoena for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) from then-Special Counsel Jack Smith to AT&T, rubber-stamped by Boasberg himself, who slapped a gag order on the telecom giant to keep the Texas senator in the dark. As conservative platform RedState laid out, it's peak weaponization.

"He should be impeached. This is why I'm glad that my colleague out of Texas, Rep. Brandon Gill, is actually filing those documents to have him impeached," Donalds fired off. "You can not have a judge just be rogue in our system of justice, helping to abet a rogue prosecutor like Jack Smith to start targeting any American, let alone United States senators."

"This is outrageous! And once again, it demonstrates the length to which the Democrats would stoop in order to keep political power in the United States," he added. "This is not about the Constitution. This is not about the American people. This is about their craven desire to remain in power."

"And you can look at this shutdown or anything else that's going on this year to demonstrate the fact that the Democrats do not care what lever they have to pull or where they have to go to," Donalds continued. "It's about power for them first, second, and third, not the American people, not the Constitution."

Cruz, naturally, was the first Republican voice roaring for Boasberg's head on a pike after this Arctic Frost fiasco came to light. He dissected the judge's deranged order to AT&T, accusing Cruz of being a flight risk for evidence-torching.The report read:

"'The court finds reasonable grounds that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence,'" Cruz read, speaking about the order. "'Intimidation of witnesses and serious jeopardy to the investigation.'"

"There is precisely zero evidence to conclude that I am likely to destroy or tamper with evidence," he added. "Or to intimidate potential witnesses. Zero evidentiary basis for that. This order is an abuse of power. This order is a weaponized legal system."

Cruz demanded the House impeach Boasberg for "abuse of power," all while issuing subpoenas against Republicans on zero probable cause.

Not to be outdone, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) piled on, declaring it the first time in his career he's ever bayed for a judge's impeachment. "This is the first time I've called for a judge's impeachment. Normally, appellate courts and the Supreme Court rein in rogue district judges. Not Boasberg--he's truly lawless. He's openly biased, gone rogue, and likely broken the law."

Buckle up, folks. We will see if Boasberg's house of cards finally topples under the weight of his own arrogance. 

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Trump admin refers NY AG James for possible prosecution over mortgage fraud

You know what they say about payback that it's something that sounds like beach. This may be what is happening with New York Attorney General Letitia "Get Trump" James.

AG James has been punched with shocking allegations by the Trump administration, having accused her of mortgage fraud. That's bigger than Watergate!

In documents obtained by Fox News Channel's The Ingraham Angle, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice, accusing James of mortgage fraud.

Holy moley!

FHFA Director William Pulte dropped a bombshell in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, accusing Letitia James of cooking the books to game lending requirements and snag sweeter loan deals. Pulte’s pointing fingers at a Virginia property James allegedly claimed as her main crib—despite being a New York elected official—and a New York building she called a four-unit structure when it’s supposedly five. Why? To score a cushier loan, that’s why.

Fox News contributor and GWU law professor Jonathan Turley, who’s never short on sharp takes, told Laura Ingraham the irony here is “perfectly crushing.” 

He didn’t hold back: “This is a person who prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress, and among the charges that were brought in New York, in just the civil but the criminal case, was making false or misleading statements to financial institutions.” 

Turley’s basically saying James is hoisted by her own petard. “As for James, if we apply the Letitia James standard that she created, there’d be little question here. This seems pretty straightforward.”

It gets weirder. James allegedly listed her dad as her husband to file as a married couple. Yeah, you read that right. Turley’s like, “The Supreme Court just stated earlier in March, in a case called Thompson, that they want to see knowing false statements under sections like 10-14, not just misleading statements. These are misleading statements: either it’s your principal residence or it’s not. Either you’re married to your father or he’s your father.” 

Mic drop!

The New York Post dug up documents showing James and her dad listed as “husband and wife” on a property buy in 1983 and 2000. Pulte’s not letting that slide, writing, “While this was a long time ago, it raises serious concerns about the validity of Ms. James’ representations on mortgage applications.” 

James, who’s been Trump’s legal kryptonite, led the 2022 civil fraud suit against him and his crew, gloating through the courtroom drama and cheering when Trump got slapped with a $454 million judgment (now on appeal). In 2025 alone, she’s unleashed at least five legal assaults on the Trump admin, including a push to block DOGE from Treasury systems and another over slashed research grants. Busy lady.

But now? The tables have turned, and the DOJ and James are dodging Fox News’ calls. Turley, back on Ingraham Angle, called the documents “quite damning.” This isn’t the first time someone’s been prosecuted for this kind of thing, and if James’ own standards are applied, she might be in deeper than she’d like. 

Stay tuned—this one’s got legs.

Loving the blog? Toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee if you’re feeling generous – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure.

Tweet

Stanford students want woke Dean who led heckling of federal judge fired

Students at Stanford Law School blasted the school and its woke Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion deans in the school's publication, "Stanford Review." The headline went straight to point: “Fire Tirien Steinbach.”

Fire Tirien Steinbach https://t.co/imVeG5Usgy

— The Stanford Review (@StanfordReview)

Here's what happened that led up to the students' ire. Steinbach is Stanford's Law Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Judge Kyle Duncan at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals was attempting to give a speech at the school and was ruthlessly heckled and screamed at by students. When he asked for the administration to intervene, Steinbach went into a 6-minute diatribe stating that Judge Duncan was "literally denying the humanity of people."

Duncan's crime? 

He refused to retroactively change court records to reflect that a child porn scumcrumpet and repeated sex offender Norman Varner decided after his trial to identify as female and demanded to be referred to as “Kathy Jett.” Duncan refused to change the record to accommodate him.

Although the university belatedly delivered a written apology to Duncan, many felt that it was weak, like an Ilhan Omar apology for an anti-Semitic statement, for example, and Steinbach suffered no repercussions for her unacceptable behavior.

The real kick in the gonads came after the university issued a letter to students who were upset about the interruptions, and were advised to seek mental help. 

The letter was written by Tirien Steinbach!

Judge Duncan had to be escorted from the intended speech by armed marshalls to ensure his safety. This is what is happening to our so-called "elite" universities.

Fox News' Laura Ingraham host of the  eponymous "Ingraham Angle" tweeted:

Imagine if Tirien Steinbach was a conservative white male Stanford dean who had berated a federal judge appointed by Pres. Obama. Yeah, I can’t either.https://t.co/DrZj80Ggl3 pic.twitter.com/ZSbecohqcV

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 11, 2023

The Stanford Review is a student-run independent newspaper. The outlet’s article, credited to “multiple authors,” described their disgust with how the situation went down at a school that falsely touts its commitment to free speech:

Perhaps the only thing uglier than the Stanford Law School building is the events that took place there on Thursday. The Stanford Federalist Society’s event with Kyle Duncan, a judge on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, was disrupted by a mob of unruly law students and a Stanford DEI Dean who prevented the judge from speaking entirely.

The article did not forget to include the part about Steinbach:

… at the center of the debacle was not the group of unruly law students, but Stanford Law School’s own Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Tirien Steinbach.

These future lawyers say that this DEI Ass[ociate] Dean should suffer consequences for defaming Stanford's reputation. It also stated that the university's claims that it values free speech are baseless if the administration doesn't actually protect free speech.

The apology said that Stanford would take steps to prevent this from reoccurring again, but didn't say what those steps were going to be to keep this from happening in the future. One thing is certain, getting rid of Steinbach is a good first step.

The article also noted that Steinbach clearly planned for this whole thing to take place:

Someone who is so eager, at the behest of an unruly mob, to shut down free speech, which Stanford itself considers “a bedrock principle for the law school, the university, and a democratic society,” has no place as a Stanford dean. She helped engineer chaos with her email before the event, delivered prepared remarks interrupting his speech, took the spotlight for herself, and has shown no remorse since.

At least some Stanford students (hopefully the majority of them) recognize tyranny when they see it and are standing up against the woke leftists who are obviously unaware of what their tyrannical goals would achieve in the long run, because once those in power get what they want, the underlings lose what they had--unalienable rights and freedom.

The piece closes with a powerful argument:

If these law students are to be trained for bench and bar, it certainly should be with a deep respect for the bedrock principle of free speech. Steinbach’s actions not only degrade the principles of free speech but degrade the prestige and reputation of Stanford Law School itself.

This is a good case of where the children are teaching their teachers.

It's time to get rid of Steinbach and anyone else who would take away our free speech. Consider forwarding this on to a friend, especially those who care about this issue or may be affected by it.

Tweet

Comedy News Network's edgy use of the word "bulsh*t"

In an effort to sound edgy and maybe even a tad relevant, the Comedy News Network (CNN) called out "bullsh*t on the air, using the word itself and hoping to cause jaws to drop and children to be told to leave the airport.

Erin Burnett wasn't even bleeped when you used that word. It's as if CNN is trying to hard to pretend they're hard news that pulls no punches, takes no dog tags, and makes no sense as the host went after vaccine-skeptical conservative politicians and journalists.

Burnett was not the first CNN fake news "journalist" to use the naughty word, "bullsh*t." Jim "Dear Diary" Acosta called Fox News a "bullsh*t factory in a May 1st broadcast, showing how little he knows about how bullsh*t is actually made. He also revealed just how jealous he is of the cable network that's eating CNNs lunch.

And host Fredo Cuomo went after then-President Trump a year ago using the same bovine fecal-focused language as Burnett and Acosta when Trump showed off Goya products during the COVID-19 pandemic. "You tell me how a president in the middle of a pandemic has got time for this bulls**t? Are you kidding me?" the dumbest narcissist on TV said.

But even earlier in the 2020, proudly gay host Anderson Cooper in an interview with Rod Blagojevich used the taboo word heard by many American Airlines passengers waiting to board, calling "bullsh*t" on Blago for claiming he was wrongfully convicted of public corruption.

It is also believed that Brian Stelter may have once used the word "cocky" in the same regard.

But Burnett did these men one better decorating her expletive with a cherry on top.

The potty mouth began her segment by highlighting "deadly disinformation about COVID vaccines, much of it coming from Republican lawmakers and right-wing media." Then she showed clips of GOP lawmakers such as Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado stating their disagreement with getting the shots.

Afterward, Burnett chimed in, saying "it's not just skepticism and fear mongering from lawmakers, of course — right-wing media reaches millions of Americans." 

A hell of a lot more than CNN, that's for sure.

Then more video showed Fox News' hosts Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham calling the idea of forcing vaccines on Americans a "scandal" and "anti-Democratic" and "anti-freedom," which of course it is.

Burnett was clearly pissed off: "It's stunning. All of those people are smart enough to know that what they're saying is complete bulls**t, and that's the problem. They should be ashamed."

One has to wonder, however, if Burnett's children were ashamed or proud of their mother's garbage mouth.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

The Crreative News Network gets slapped for calling D.C. carjacking death an "accident"

Washington, D.C., -- The Creative News Network (CNN) reframed a botched carjacking in which two teenage girls used a taser on a Uber Eats driver but that resulted in a serious vehicle accident that caused his death. 

Rather than calling the incident what it was, a carjacking, they referred to the driver Mohammad Anwar's death merely as an "accident."

The reason CNN apparently left out the important detail about what caused the "accident," might have something to do with the fact that the girls are Black. In fact, carjackings among young people in Washington, D.C., has increased significantly of late, and most have been committed by young Black men.

The fake news network received a butt-load of backlash over the weekend as a result of their selective methods of reporting what police called "felony murder" as an accident.

The girls — ages 13 and 15 — were charged with felony murder. Police officials say they attacked Anwar with a stun gun during the attempted carjacking, the car later crashed, flipped on its side, and Anwar died from his injuries after being thrown from the vehicle. The girls, for their part, were more interesting in what happened to their respective cellphones in the accident, not so much what happened to Anwar, 66, who came to the U.S. in 2014 to create a better life for his family.

The enhanced murder charges against the teens stem from a legal doctrine that "allows a killing that occurs in the course of a dangerous felony, even an accidental death, to be charged against the felon as first-degree murder," according to Nolo's Plain-English Law Dictionary.

Video of the carjacking incident made the rounds on social media. It shows the event in progress as the car speeds off with Anwar hanging outside. It crashes and the videographer races toward the scene. Meanwhile nearby National Guardsmen pull the girls from the wreckage with Anwar's body twitching nearby on the ground as onlookers just kept looking on, doing nothing to help him, as most onlookers are wont to do.

One of the teen girls can be heard saying, "Please, my phone is in there. My phone is in there," as Anwar was dying nearby. She cared more about her freaking phone than a human being she was responsible for killing.

This is what our society is devolving into.

CNN reported:

"Police said the girls, 13 and 15, assaulted an Uber Eats driver with a Taser while carjacking him, which led to an accident in which he was fatally injured"

It did not lead to an "accident"--it led to a felony murder.

By Sunday morning, CNN's verbal calisthenics of the murder as an "accident "was one of Twitter's top trending topics with more than 100,000 tweets.

Comedian Tim Dillon mocked:

"These girls made a whoopsie when they murdered this man. Total accident. They were in wrong place at wrong time! They're good kids! Kids murder in cold blood/ make mistakes."

 Fox News host Laura Ingraham reacted:

"Wonder what took CNN so long to report what the rest of us did days ago. Doesn't advance their poisonous race narrative, that's why."

Another Twitter user said.

"A white man shoots 6 Asians and 2 white people, and he is a white supremacist. A middle eastern man shoots up a store, and well, 'Don't jump to conclusions,' they say. 2 young black girls assault a man with a taser and murder him, and it's an accident. Oh, the hypocrisy."

Yet another user said:

"If these girls were white, this headline would be worded much differently and the outrage factor would be dialed up."

It would have led to a CNN party if the two girls were White men.

As one person rightly noted:

"It's always interesting how CNN and other news organizations are highly selective when determining whether or not it's worth mentioning the demographics of those involved in incidents such as this."

The trouble is, no matter how much outrage the Crappy News Network receives as a result of how they report stories they aren't going to change as long as the outlets have the backing of rich leftists who propagate such crap.

The only bright side to this horror is that more than $400,000 had been raised for Anwar's family by Sunday afternoon.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

AOC argues with Laura Ingraham and proves how smart she isn't

When she isn't destroying the possibility of new jobs for New Yorkers, or calling for a Green New Deal that would destroy the economy and the entire character of the nation, socialist Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-NY) is destroying her credibility as a person with even a shred of practical intelligence.

Comatose, whose other name is Ocasio-Cortez, would have more credibility if she kept her leftist ideas to herself. She is a person who believes that all student debt should be forgiven, while punishing the lending institutions that loaned them the money in good faith with the promise to repay the debt. If you read the Green New Deal, you will see that it was written by a cock-eyed idiot who doesn't know the first thing about the subject she claims to have majored in at college: economics.

And now she got into a kerfuffle with Fox News' Laura Ingraham after she tweeted: "COVID deaths are disproportionately spiking in Black + Brown communities. Why? Because the chronic toll of redlining, environmental racism, wealth gap, etc. ARE underlying health conditions. Inequality is a comorbidity. COVID relief should be drafted with a lens of reparations." [HT Twitchy]

.

To which Laura responded: "The Doctor of Mixology will save us!"

When you accuse a virus of being racist, you have lost every argument you have ever made about racism. The virus obviously doesn't give a rat's you know what, who it infects. New York City is a highly densely populated town where people are packed into public transportation like sardines. And when you have the Mayor of New York, Comrade Bill de Blasio, telling everyone to go about their business in March, the Chinese Communist Wuhan Wet Market Coronavirus has a field day.

Of course, Comatose would not allow Laura's remark to go unchallenged as she made an even bigger fool of herself with: "Didn’t you just put a doctor on your show who faked their employment at Lenox Hill hospital and touted a COVID “treatment” that you tweeted & Twitter had to remove because a man may have died trying self-administer it? I’m sorry, why are you on TV again?" https://t.co/Lfc6RvtBDS

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) April 3, 2020

Ingraham returned fire:

"Typical liberal. Doesn’t know the meaning of the phrase “admitting privileges” versus “employed by”—maligning a man who has spent his life teaching and saving lives of late stage cancer patients." https://t.co/omIV4IMlM7

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) April 3, 2020

So the genius we know as AOC also believed the media spin that President Trump touted a fish tank cleaner rather than the drug currently used to treat malaria and appears to have clinical efficacy in treating COVID-19. The former bartender doesn't understand the difference between the two. 

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

David Hogg mocks Laura Ingraham and looks really stupid

Soon-to-be low-end Harvard student and gun-control activist David "Wart" Hogg sent a mocking, albeit misinformed, New Year's wishes to Laura Ingraham of Fox News.

The triangular face twit used a Daily Kos headline about Laura's media situation. Being that it came from the Daily Kos, you know it's as accurate as Blind Willie Bland Pea Pod shooting at scared rabbits with a slingshot.

Hogg tweeted Monday:

“Happy new year @IngrahamAngle,” he wrote Monday, while re-tweeting a Daily Kos article from earlier in the afternoon headlined “Laura Ingraham’s Radio Show Cancelled Due To Advertiser Boycott.”

Mr. Hogg came to national prominence  by using the deaths of fellow students and thus leading anti-gun students among the Parkland High School student body in, among other things, a boycott of Ms. Ingraham’s advertisers. 

Ms. Ingraham had mocked his having been rejected by several public universities in California and Florida because his grades aren't good enough, and he, in turn went ballistic, if you can say ballistic about an anti Second Amendment weasel.

Ms. Ingraham will no longer do a live radio show in 2019, but she announced that fact in early November, saying she no longer could do a daily live radio show along with her Fox News program. 

This had nothing to do with anything Hogg tried to accomplish, which is to ruin everyone who disagrees with him that the Second Amendment should be abolished, guns removed from the hands of all citizens, and only the government should have the right to have firearms. Kind of what happened in Nazi Germany.

Instead, Ingraham will host a daily podcast series “The Laura Ingraham Show” on PodcastOne. The Daily Kos article mentioned those facts, though the headline didn’t, which is absolutely their intention. [Kos in Russian means "crap"--probably.]

Ms. Ingraham explained it thus to the Washington Examiner in November:

“But listeners demanded a more flexible listening experience, and my kids need more of my time. Podcasting is where all the action is happening now, and I intend to inject my own brand of humor and substance in the national conversation with in-depth interviews, conversations and even more audience interaction.” 

Certainly not to Hogg's doing, she  also continues to host one of the highest-rated TV shows in cable news.

Good luck at Harvard, you weasel whisperer.

I wish you a Happy New Years, my fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.




Tweet

Code Pink's Gold thinks Linda Sarsour is the greatest ally to the Jews

On "The Ingraham Angle" earlier this week, Laura Ingraham interviewed Ariel Gold, the national co-director of Code Pink.

According to Wikipedia, Code Pink is an international NGO that describes itself as a "grassroots peace and social justice movement working to end U.S.-funded wars and occupations, to challenge militarism globally and to redirect our resources into health care, education, green jobs and other life-affirming activities."

The organization has also gotten involved with trips to meet with drone victims in Pakistan and Yemen, bringing them to the U.S., as well as Guantanamo Bay prison in which they perform a protest yearly in front of the White House.

But most importantly for this discussion, Code Pink advocates for the Boycott, Sanction and Divest movement (BDS) against Israel. Their love of so-called Palestine and hatred of Jews, even from their secular Jewish national co-director, Ariel Gold, became apparent in the Laura Ingraham interview. It also displayed Gold's lack of knowledge of what she was espousing.

Gold said of the known anti-Semitie and supporter of Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan, that he Jewish community has "no greater ally" than she.

We call that 'gaslighting' because it's exactly opposite of the facts.

Laura Ingraham asked Gold: "You say that Linda Sarsour is an ally of the Jewish people, then why would Jewish Americans like Jonathan Greenblatt--he is the head of the Anti-Defamation League--have a real problem with her statements?"

The Sharia sycophant responded by saying that Greenblatt is "disgraceful" and is "spending his time going after people who are our real allies. After the attack on Jewish cemeteries, Linda Sarsour raised over $100,000 after the Pittsburgh massacre, she raised over $200,000."

"We have no greater ally in the Jewish community in this time where anti-Semitism is dangerously on the rise than Linda Sarsour," Gold claimed.

Except that according to Jihad Watch, Sarsour gave $10,000 to the synagogue and $150,000 of that money was given to an Islamic Center. So as far as Sarsour is concerned, the joke's on the Jews.

Gold then accused the ADL of being on a "witch hunt" against Sarsour because she is a "strong, Palestinian, Muslim woman," instead of "dealing with the fact that we have white nationalism in the Senate, in the House, and in the White House."

Ingraham laughed and asked her to clarify what in the world she was talking about. "Name three white nationalist Senators," she challenged.

"What about Shaun King?" Gold said.

"Why, is he a white nationalist? In the U.S. Senate? Shaun King?"

"In the House," Gold clarified.

“He is an activist for Black Lives Matter,” Ingraham explained.

“Sorry I might be referring to…”

“That’s all right,” Ingraham responded.

Gold later explained that she was referring to Rep. Steve King (R-IA).

Gold also went on to idiotically defend Marc Lamont Hill, who was recently fired from CNN for implying Israel should be eliminated when he used the slogan “free Palestine from the river to the sea,” a quite commonly used phrase by Hamas and other terrorist organizations that call for the elimination of the state of Israel, which is why his words got a round of applause from the anti-Semitic anal sphincters in attendance at the UN where he had spoken.

“Marc Lamont Hill was clear that what he was discussing is that Palestinians deserve freedom, equality, and justice, just as Israelis do,” Gold said. Either she is stupid or just covering up for her own anti-Zionist views.

Ingraham asked, “Why is he hanging out with Farrakhan, would you hang out with Farrakhan?”

“I have no love for Farrakhan,” Gold answered.

“Okay, so why is the head of the Women’s March posing with him and why is the trio of fools at the Women’s March showing up at his Nation of Islam conferences? Why?” Ingraham asked the empty vessel made of Gold.

“Linda Sarsour shows up for Jews. No one showed up after the Pittsburgh massacre,” Gold said.

Gold took to Twitter later to call it “ridiculous” that she was the only Jew in the conversation and that Ingraham and the other guest, Michelle Malkin, “argued they, not me were the authority on protecting Jews.”

But Gold believes herself to be Jewish based on a knish she once ate long ago.


Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, if you would visit the ads on this page it helps the economy grow and it does a world of good for me.

Tweet

WOW: Kavanaugh's mother foreclosed on accuser's mom and dad

Looks like Christine Blasey Ford didn't think they would find out about the real relationship between her and Brett Kavanaugh, the nominee for Supreme Court Justice.

Court documents show that Kavanaugh's mother presided over a foreclosure case involving Blasey Ford's parents, the woman who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault 36 years ago. Laura Ingraham tweeted about this:

Accuser Christine Ford's PARENTS Were Defendants in a 1996 Foreclosure Case, Presided Over by Kavanaugh's Mother

Judge Martha Kavanaugh sat on the Montgomery County Circuit Court bench, issued the order against Ralph and Paula Blasey, the parents of sexual assault accuser Christine Blasey Ford, Mediaite reported.

Mark Levin of Fox News, tweeted:

Looks like the Kavanaugh accuser has some explaining to do, as do the Democrats who sat on the accuser's letter for months.

Something smells fishy.


Click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page.



Tweet

Parkland shooting opportunist goes verbally attacks war hero

David Hogg skipping high school

Parkland shooting opportunist David Hogg, 17, stands on the graves of the victims killed on Feb. 14 by a mentally ill shooter and he used his unearned "expertise" to attack Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for being the top recipient of NRA funding in Congress.

"Why do you take so much money from the NRA?" Hogg asked in response to McCain's tweet about the Phoenix-area "Rio Reimagined" redevelopment project.

While McCain had not yet responded to Hogg's question, perhaps he should tell the teen something along these lines:

"I am the number one recipient for NRA money among all members of Congress for a reason. First of all, I support the Constitution of the United States and that includes all of the Amendments therein. The Second Amendment isn't about hunting--it's about a citizen's God-given right to defend him or herself and their family.

"Second, I support the traditions and ideals of the NRA--they teach gun safety and responsible gun ownership. They were never against background checks, but the left would have you believe that lie. 

"In 2013 I took a lot of guff from my side of the aisle because I supported a bipartisan compromise on gun-purchase background checks, even though it never cleared the Senate floor. My heart was in the right place but you were 12 years old and probably too busy playing violent video games to follow politics.  In fact, I was one of only four Republicans to vote for that legislation. 

"Finally, I don't know why you and others in your school are attacking the NRA instead of going after those in law enforcement and mental health who didn't do their jobs, which would have stopped the shooter before he could have ever gotten his hands on a firearm. The Broward County Sheriff's Department, the FBI and the mental health facility who deemed the young man "not a danger to self or others" dropped the ball in this case--the NRA had absolutely nothing to do with the shooting, but they are the 'go-to' organization liberals go after before the dead are even buried.

I am not a big fan of Sen. John McCain on many issues. Some say he's a RINO because they don't like that he's often willing to work both sides of the aisle. I believe that's true, but I also know that McCain has done a lot more for the country than this teenage bag of bull crap has done, and I offer no apology for my opinion, unlike Laura Ingraham who apologized for tweeting that Hogg whined about not being accepted by four colleges.

After Ingraham apologized, Hogg tweeted to boycott her sponsors and one sponsor, Hulu, complied. That should give you an idea as to what to do with Hulu and with Hogg--just pay them no mind.


Tweet

To deputies: 'Don't go into school without body cams'

Laura Ingraham of Fox News, said Monday in an exclusive report that the Broward County deputies were ordered not to to into the Stoneman Douglas High School to confront the shooter as he killed 17 people, mostly students on Valentine's Day.

The reason they were told to stand down was due to them not wearing body cameras. 

It sounds as if Sheriff Israel was concerned that if they shot the shooter without photographic proof that they did the right thing, his buddies on the left would blame the department for an unjustified use of lethal force.

"Now, our sources near the Broward County sheriff's department are telling us that the deputies who arrived at the scene of the shooting were told not to enter the school unless their body cameras were turned on, and then we found out that the deputies did not have body cameras so they did not enter the building or engage the shooter," Ingraham said. 

"Curiously, police also lost radio communications during the Parkland shooting. And our source claims that radio communication also went dead during the Fort Lauderdale airport shooting in 2017 that he also go a lot of criticism for," she added.

Ms. Ingraham didn't say who issued the order not to go into the school, but I suspect if we investigated deeply, we'd find that Sheriff Israel, the vile, arrogant leftist political wannabe, had something to do with it.


Tweet

Nuclear Options, Nuclear Iran, Friday Brain Flushings

I'm Making You An Offer You Can't Refuse

It has been quite a week in the wacky world of politics. Reid goes nuclear; Iran is currently doing the same under the guise of efficient energy production for peaceful purposes; Obamacare doesn't just cover abortions, it has become one; and Ed Schultz has gone beyond calling Laura Ingraham a "slut," he has become a presidential confidante along with a host of MNSBC hosts and Juan Williams of Fox News.