Boasberg's Reign of Terror on the Bench Could Be Coming to a Screeching Halt as GOP Rep Drops Impeachment Hammer

Oh, the sweet sound of accountability finally catching up to a partisan hack in a black robe. Leftist poster boy Judge James Boasberg is learning the hard way that you can't just play fast and loose with the Constitution forever without someone swinging back. Texas Rep. Brandon Gill (R-26), who's reportedly gearing up to file articles of impeachment against this clown in the fallout from the latest bombshell on Biden's dystopian spy op, Operation Arctic Frost.

Fresh off a chat with Fox News' Laura Ingraham, Florida Rep. Byron Donalds (R-19) spilled the beans that his Texas counterpart Gill is knee-deep in paperwork to boot Boasberg, who moonlights as chief judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C., right out of his cushy gig. This all blew up after this week's gut-punch reveal: a whopping 197 subpoenas targeting conservative heavyweights and everyday Americans in Biden's fever-dream surveillance scheme via Operation Arctic Frost.

Exhibit A is a sneaky subpoena for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) from then-Special Counsel Jack Smith to AT&T, rubber-stamped by Boasberg himself, who slapped a gag order on the telecom giant to keep the Texas senator in the dark. As conservative platform RedState laid out, it's peak weaponization.

"He should be impeached. This is why I'm glad that my colleague out of Texas, Rep. Brandon Gill, is actually filing those documents to have him impeached," Donalds fired off. "You can not have a judge just be rogue in our system of justice, helping to abet a rogue prosecutor like Jack Smith to start targeting any American, let alone United States senators."

"This is outrageous! And once again, it demonstrates the length to which the Democrats would stoop in order to keep political power in the United States," he added. "This is not about the Constitution. This is not about the American people. This is about their craven desire to remain in power."

"And you can look at this shutdown or anything else that's going on this year to demonstrate the fact that the Democrats do not care what lever they have to pull or where they have to go to," Donalds continued. "It's about power for them first, second, and third, not the American people, not the Constitution."

Cruz, naturally, was the first Republican voice roaring for Boasberg's head on a pike after this Arctic Frost fiasco came to light. He dissected the judge's deranged order to AT&T, accusing Cruz of being a flight risk for evidence-torching.The report read:

"'The court finds reasonable grounds that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence,'" Cruz read, speaking about the order. "'Intimidation of witnesses and serious jeopardy to the investigation.'"

"There is precisely zero evidence to conclude that I am likely to destroy or tamper with evidence," he added. "Or to intimidate potential witnesses. Zero evidentiary basis for that. This order is an abuse of power. This order is a weaponized legal system."

Cruz demanded the House impeach Boasberg for "abuse of power," all while issuing subpoenas against Republicans on zero probable cause.

Not to be outdone, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) piled on, declaring it the first time in his career he's ever bayed for a judge's impeachment. "This is the first time I've called for a judge's impeachment. Normally, appellate courts and the Supreme Court rein in rogue district judges. Not Boasberg--he's truly lawless. He's openly biased, gone rogue, and likely broken the law."

Buckle up, folks. We will see if Boasberg's house of cards finally topples under the weight of his own arrogance. 

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

SCOTUS grants Trump request to lift stay halting Venezuelan deportations

Well look who just notched a huge win in the Supreme Court sandbox. On Monday, the justices—by a razor-thin 5-4 margin—gave President Donald Trump the green light to dust off a 1798 wartime immigration law and start deporting Venezuelan nationals, including some alleged Tren de Aragua gangbangers, faster than you can say "muffins de escoria."

The high court granted President Trump’s request to vacate a lower court’s ruling that had tied the administration’s hands, handing a temporary victory to the MAGA faithful and their border-hawk agenda. 

Cue the liberal tears.

At the heart of this legal cage match? The Alien Enemies Act—yes, a law so old it predates indoor plumbing and Nancy Pelosi's parents. 

Passed by Congress in 1789, it’s been dusted off just three times before Trump decided it was his new favorite toy: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. Apparently, the fourth time’s the charm when you’re trying to remove certain migrants out of the country at warp speed.

Trump’s legal eagles swooped into the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court’s meddling “rebuffed” their immigration playbook—specifically, their sacred duty “to protect the Nation against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations.” [Translation: “Let us do our job, you robe-wearing buzzkills.”] The justices, or at least five of them, nodded in agreement and lifted the stay. Score one for Team Trump.

This whole clusterfrack kicked off when U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—a guy who clearly didn’t get the memo about Trump’s second term—slapped a 14-day timeout on the administration’s use of the 1798 law last month. A federal appeals court backed him up in a 2-1 call, because of course they did. During that appellate circus, Obama appointee Judge Patricia Millett sniffed, “Nazis got better treatment” than some of these deportees. 

Oh, please, spare us the melodrama, Your Honor. 

Boasberg and the appeals crew grilled the administration over Trump’s proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act to ship out Venezuelans—and over the three planes that hauled hundreds of migrants to El Salvador the very next day like it was a FedEx overnight delivery. At least 261 people got the boot, including over 100 Venezuelans kicked out “solely on the basis” of this ancient statute. 

The flights touched down right around the time Boasberg dropped his temporary halt, which raises a fun little question: Did Team Trump just thumb their noses at the judge? Boasberg sure thinks so—he’d ordered any planes already in the air to turn around “immediately.” Spoiler: They didn’t.

Fast forward to April 3, and Boasberg’s still having a hissy-fit. He’s considering contempt charges against Trump officials for playing hide-the-ball with info about those flights, even after he asked nicely—multiple times. 

The government’s excuse? “National security concerns.” Yeah, right. 

But then Deputy Assistant AG Drew Ensign let slip in court that the flight details probably aren’t even classified. Boasberg’s response? “Pretty sketchy,” he mused, likely while side-eyeing the feds like a disappointed dad. He’s also demanding names, locations, and interoffice gossip about who was calling the shots—and whether they were watching his rulings go down while sipping coffee and ignoring him.

This Supreme Court smackdown might’ve cleared the runway for Trump’s deportation push, but don’t pop the champagne just yet. Boasberg’s still got contempt on the table, and as of today—April 7, 2025—a preliminary injunction hearing’s looming tomorrow. Buckle up, folks; this legal rollercoaster’s got more twists than a pretzel factory.

"I pour my heart into these posts, and if they’ve sparked something for you, I’d be thrilled if you’d treat me to a coffee over at Buy Me a Coffee – totally optional, of course!"

Tweet