The Mizzou Three issue apologies for denying reporter his Constitutional rights

It's about time Constitutional antagonists were made to pay for their un-American behavior. Three of them, all members of the University of Missouri faculty, are facing repercussions after a video showed them taunting and harassing student journalists during a campus protest last week. The ironic thing about this is that one of them, Melissa Click, had a courtesy appointment with the Missouri School of Journalism, from which she has since resigned.

The face of anarchy

Another culprit (the guy with whom Click shares an address, according to the St. Louis Dispatch) Prof. Richard J. "Chip" Callahan, chairs the Religious Studies Department. He might have majored in Radical Islamic Studies because he is about as sensitive as ISIS mujahedeen to a Bar Mitzvah boy. He joined the Mizzou mob and stopped Tim Tai, a photojournalist, from reporting on the protest.

When Tai was being menaced by the students, he complained and Callahan responded with "Don't talk to me. It's not my problem."

Janna Basler, director of Greek life and leadership on campus, was also part in the suppression of Tai's First Amendment rights, and she was caught on video like the other two bubble-wiffers. She refused to respond to questions about her role in the mess caught on video.

Click was reported to have "shut herself in her university office on Tuesday afternoon and sobbing could be heard through the door." 

She slithered from her office by 5 p.m. Tuesday and released a written statement apologizing for her inexcusable actions, adding that she also apologized to Tai and expressed regret that she had shifted attention from the 'students' campaign for justice. "From this experience I have learned about humanity and humility," Click clucked.

I doubt it. Some liberal somewhere will tell Click that she had every right to keep Tai from taking photos, in spite of the fact that it is public property and Tai even attends that school.

The campus chanting has now gone from "Hey hey, ho ho, reporters have got to go," to handing out leaflets urging the anarchist protesters to respect journalists' First Amendment rights and welcome them.

Isn't it ironic, not only about Click teaching journalism, but for her and her fellow scumcrumpets to be exercising their First Amendment rights while denying the same rights to others? This can be used in the definition of hypocrisy.

Janna Basler

"Chip" Callahan apologized to Tim Tai, and the young man had more class than Callahan will ever have by accepting the apology.

Janna Basler was placed on administrative leave and she too issued an apology to Tai for being a censoring ass, although she didn't word it quite that way. She said that she allowed her emotions to get the most of her "while trying to protect some of our students." 

That isn't an apology--where I come from, we call that an excuse.


Tweet

Terror Alert! It's the weather, stupid

As President Obama flies from place-to-place, while Air Force One burns fuel as fast as the BT Gulf oil spill, while husband, Michelle, flies separately to go on yet another "free" vacation,  somehow the earth keeps getting warmer. 

Maybe the Obamas, Al Gore and the rest of those jet-set liberals ought to follow their own "green" agenda. That would make them "heroes" in their own mind.

You would think that ISIS would take heed to the global warming crisis and desist from immolating infidels, it pollutes the air and heats the earth, but they just keep doing the same evil crap all over again while the warnings about climate change fail to dissuade them from their religious obligations.

If the earth would only listen to Barack Obama, the place would cool down, the seas would separate for him, and the ISIS mujahedeen would lay down their weapons and sing Kumbayah (in Arabic).

Alaska refuses to go along with global warming. It just experienced the third highest snowfall for the month of November. Even the polar ice caps aren't obeying our Supreme Divider because it seems that they are growing, not shrinking.

In any case, terrorists still need to get on board because Obama said that climate change is the driving force behind their hideous actions. (And all along we fools thought it had something to do with Mohammad, the Koran, Hadith and Allah's terrorist commands.)

"Whaddaya want to do today, Mahmoud?"
"I dunno, Ali, whadda you want to do?"
"Hey, I know. Let's behead a few Jews and stone a few chicks for dressing up like Western sluts."

"Okay, sounds like a plan."

"But wait--it may get too hot outside to do all that heavy work. Maybe we should think about waiting for Obama's climate change ideas to kick in and in the meanwhile we can recycle."

"Okay, sounds like a plan."

Tweet

Was Dear gunning for Planned Parenthood?

I cannot imagine what would be more hypocritical than a person who is opposed to killing babies in the womb but would kill people who abort babies. Yet, there are some people on the far right fringes that might go so far as to commit murder. Not many people, but some. We call those people mentally ill.

In spite of the sadness and anger felt on both sides of the political aisle over the senseless killing of three people on Saturday in Colorado Springs, there will be some liberals who are going to use a very wide brush to paint all conservatives as crazies, and will feel satisfied in their self-righteous indignation and false moral superiority over those of us who oppose abortion.

Vicki Cowart, the CEO of the Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic is claiming that the shooter, Robert Dear, held anti-abortion views. "We are learning that eyewitnesses confirm that the man who will be charged with the tragic and senseless shooting that resulted in the deaths of three people and injuries to nine others at Planned Parenthood's health center in Colorado Springs was motivated by opposition to safe and legal abortion."

Cowart calls the Planned Parenthood (PP) clinic a "health center" because she may be motivated to paint the abortion clinic in a better light--just a guess, not a fact. And to say he was "motivated by opposition to safe and legal abortion" gives Robert Dear credit for brain cells he doesn't possess.

It makes sense to question the validity of the claim that Dear was a champion of the conceived but yet unborn. He might be, but I don't trust the claim at this time. His thinking, I suspect, was influenced by the latest media videos showing PP selling baby parts. He spoke to that after he was arrested. 

There's an interesting article about Dear in American Thinker. It may shed some light on who he is.

However, if Dear killed people to stop them from killing people, then it is highly probable he is mentally ill and does not represent those of us who are pro-life. 

Cowart said, "This is an appalling act of violence targeting access to health care and terrorizing skilled and dedicated health care professionals." 

Of course it's an appalling act of violence. But to say it targeted access to health care is to stretch the definition of health beyond its meaning. Just ask the babies. Oh wait, you can't--they're dead. 

Another question is whether Dear actually targeted the "health care professionals" or the access to the abortion clinic. (See, when you call it by its major reason for existence it sounds different than the way PP would want you to hear it.) 

A law enforcement official told the Associated Press that Dear made a "no more baby parts" remark following his arrest, so yes, this gives credence to the claim that he was targeting PP. The official could not be identified due to the fact that this is an ongoing investigation--therefore, we too should be slow to judge the motivation of this deranged man.

I am in no way defending Robert Dear. He is crazy, dangerous and does not in any way, shape or form represent pro-life conservatives. I am extremely sorry for the loss of life. It's just that the soundbites of politics seems to be making an appearance. 

And just because Dear is apparently mentally ill does not change my beliefs concerning abortion and gun control issues, but normal people write about them or protest about them, they don't kill about them.

Even U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch has politicized the incident saying that the Friday attack was a crime against women receiving health care services. (Not from the baby's perspective.) It is not the job of the AG to make political statements, but trying to stop a liberal from doing that is like getting a liberal president to stop a BP Gulf Coast oil spill.

Finally, people who knew Dear said he never spoke about religion or abortion, and he had few religious or political leanings. Perhaps if he had positive religious views, he would have seen his actions in a different light.

In any case, Robert Dear does not represent conservatives or any normal person.



Tweet

Obama's Love Letter to ISIL

The Washington Free Beacon was told by an official of U.S. Central Command that warning pamphlets were dropped on ISIS (aka ISIL) targets 45 minutes before bombing sorties were to be flown. This was done "to minimize the risks to civilians."

This disclosure comes soon after it was learned that U.S. pilots were forbidden to drop 75 percent of their ordnance on targets lest they harm innocent civilians. The most recent dropping of warning pamphlets was on a convoy of trucks near the city of Al-Bukamal in Syria.

The leaflets read: "Get our of your trucks now and run away from them."

The original text, which was penned by President Obama, and only disclosed on this blog, read as follows:

Dear ISIL:

Unlike you, we do not wish to harm civilians in your un-Islamic war. And unlike you, our brave men and women who proudly serve in our armed forces wear uniforms to distinguish them from defenseless, unarmed civilians.

Since we cannot tell an ISIL mujaheddin fighting for the cause of the Caliphate, from a civilian member of "The Religion of Peace," we are dropping these WARNING LETTERS which will allow the civilians among you to LEAVE THIS AREA IMMEDIATELY! as our next dropping will be bombs, and we do not want to hurt of kill them.

If you are still reading this letter at this time, you have 45 minutes to get out of the area. But if the time frame we are giving you is insufficient, please let me know--you have my cell phone number.

Our bombs will only seek out empty buildings, the occasional U.S. armored vehicles you unlawfully stole from our Iraqi allies, and, Allah willing, some loaded oil tankers.

We wish no one in civilian dress any harm, and we will avoid targeting mosques and any Christian churches you have razed and plan to rebuild as a conquest mosque.

Finally, I want to assure you that our ordnance is "environmentally friendly" and will not hurt wildlife or cause undo distress.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely yours,

Barack Hussein Obama, Supreme Leader of the West

Going home

This is how we are "fighting" the war against ISIS. This is how we are going to lose if things don't change.

This is like going on a job interview and being asked: "What is your worst quality?" and you answer, "I'm lazy except for when I beat my dog."

We are not going to end up with the outcome we want and desperately need when we have a JV president who is clueless in the saddle.



Tweet

Robert L. Dear, the Colorado shooter, and what we know

Now we know more about Robert L. Dear, the gunman who fired upon a Planned Parenthood (PP) clinic on Friday, killing Garrett Swasey, a six-year veteran officer at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, and two civilians. Nine others were also injured in the shootings.

Dear has a long criminal history, having been accused of domestic abuse by his wife in 1997, when they lived in Walterboro, S.C.  There is also a peeping tom charge and one for animal cruelty. Obviously, Dear, 57, is a very disturbed individual.

Dear's arrest followed a standoff with police that lasted over five hours after he began firing near a PP clinic. The charges he now faces will make the others look like jay walking offenses by comparison.

Not allowing a tragedy to go to waste, liberals, including the "Divider in Chief" are jumping on the anti-gun bandwagon and the abortion issue. The first issue is understandable, but if PP isn't merely in the business to provide abortions, why are liberals in a huff over the shooting? It probably had nothing to do with Dear being upset about PP killing babies--in fact, he doesn't seem the type. 

There is, however, clear evidence that we need to look deeper into the issues of gun laws and gun control.

If Colorado gun laws were Constitutionally in sync and civilians were able to carry (concealed or open), there might be three people alive today and Dear would have been stopped or have been smart enough not to have started in the first place. We will never know.

"We have to do something about the easy accessibility of weapons of war on our streets to people who have no business wielding them," Obama said in a statement.

You simply cannot get more dramatic than calling long rifles "weapons of war." Obama wouldn't know war unless it actually involved the White House. Bows and arrows, stones and fire were weapons of war too. 

The problem isn't the instruments that can kill--that can be almost anything--the problem is our ability to monitor those who would have "weapons of war."

Dear is probably as nutty as an MSNBC anchor. People who know him say he is mostly a loner but when he spoke, he rambled on nonsensically and avoided making eye-contact. Although liberals tend to do the same, it appears that Dear is substantially crazier and should have not been able to exercise his Second Amendment rights.

One neighbor, James Russell, told the AP that he didn't recall Dear ever talking about religion or abortion, so the PP involvement may have been serendipitous talking points for liberals.

Obviously, there will be more to learn about Dear in the near future.

Regarding the criminal charges that we know of from Dear's past, the June 1997 domestic abuse charge came when his wife claimed he pushed her out of a window, and though she didn't press formal charges, she wanted it on the record.

In June 2002, he was seen by husband and wife neighbors lurking in their bushes outside their home and Dear was arrested on the peeping tom charge. He followed up by allegedly making "unwanted advancements" toward his neighbor but those charges were dropped.

In Nov. 2002 a neighbor alleged that Dear shot his dog with a pellet gun. And though Dear denied the shooting, the genius then told police that his neighbor "was lucky that it was only a pellet that hit the dog and not a bigger round."

In Sept. 2004, the same neighbor reported to police that Dear phoned him and accused him of knocking over his motorcycle and then threatened him with bodily harm.

Dear eventually moved to Swannanoa, N.C. and was charged in two other incidents, one in 2007 the other in 2011, but the police records do not specify details of those charges.

Anyone crazier than a liberal should not be allowed to own a weapon of any kind.


Tweet

Our Racial Divider in Chief

Our Divider in Chief is still talking about slavery and how it is "still part of our DNA." Why is it that there are some among us who cannot stop talking about race? Why is everything they see in terms of race? 

Because it is a form of psychological projection whereby these people defend their own impulses by attributing them to others while denying them existing within themselves.

When those 9 black church members were killed by a crazy racist white man in Charleston, S.C., Obama said in an interview "Racism, we are not cured of it. And it's not just a matter of it not being polite to say nigger in public. That's not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It's not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 or 300 years prior."

His race consultants

Nobody on the right is arguing with him that racism still exists. In fact, it probably, and unfortunately, will always exist in the human experience. But he, as the first black president (yes, I know he's "half white," but he doesn't seem to push that so much on the public) should show pride in the American people for electing him.

Is it okay for a black president to use the "n" word? Does his black skin give him the license to utter a racial slur?

No more than a Jew making anti-Semitic comments or a Christian calling a "Piss Jesus" a work of art. It's legal, but it doesn't feel okay.

Sure, there are racists in America, but not all of them are white. Many of them are people who talk about "white privilege" and hate us for being born with less melanin. That's as crazy as the slime ball who killed those dear church goers in South Carolina.


Tweet

GOP warns Obama not to screw around with the climate

The Islamic State is growing in leaps and beheadings while Democrats and President Obama plan to fight the scourge of terrorism at next week's international summit in Paris on global climate. This is their number one priority in spite of the rest of the country. 

"Uhh"

The so-called commander-in-chief wants to push for a global climate deal as he and other world leaders charge ahead at the two-week U.N. conference starting Monday. Since the balderdash will be in Paris, extra security on heightened alert will finally be on alert and in greater number after the fact of the attack that killed 130 and wounded several hundred more.

The GOP has warned our "U.S. Constitutional Circumventer" that if he tries to do any circumventing this time, they will block vital funding. Why they haven't blocked vital funding for other illegal actions Barry has taken is a mystery and the biggest reason Donald Trump is leading in the polls. People are fed up with politicians.

"I'm doing tremendous in the polls," Donald said recently. "Tremendous, Bill. Tremendous."

"What a powerful rebuke to the terrorists it will be when the world stands as one and shows that we will not be deterred from building a better future for our children," President Obama hallucinated.

What planet is Obama living on? While his failure to contain ISIS, ISIL, Al- Qaeda, Al Nusra and Al-Shabaab grows, we have a president doing an "Al Gore." Americans aren't as concerned about cutting emissions and going green as they used to be, before all the killing escalated, now their biggest concern is terrorism.

I can hear Obama liberals saying: "You think you can scare us by burning pilots, killing nuns and priests, destroying churches, killing Jews and Christians, throwing gays and lesbians off tall buildings in a single bound, destroying Christian religious artifacts, attacking us at malls while we shop? 

You can't scare us one bit . . . we recycle, dammit.

Anyone who equates the dangers in climate change with the dangers in radical Islamic terrorism isn't a serious person to even waste your time discussing the situation.

Right now, the nation and Congress is divided over Obama's plans for cutting emissions. Doing so will seriously hurt the economy and particularly hurt the poorest of us as the cost of transporting goods will make prices climb. It will destroy many jobs in the coal industry, and industry that is already suffering from the myriad regulations it must comply with.

If Obama tries to draw an international agreement without seeking Senate approval, the GOP plans to stop him. Obama's goal of $3 billion for the Green Climate Fund, including $500 million in the near future to help developing nations with climate change (which, if you're a betting person would be wise to put your money on Islamic countries), would be withheld by the Senate. No vote, no money, lawmakers are telling the "Annoying One."

"Without Senate approval, there will be no money--period," Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said at last week's hearing. He stressed that any legally binding agreements must come before the Senate for a vote--something Obama would like to circumvent.

One can anticipate Obama's snide public reaction: "These folks, these Republicans, uhh, don't want clean air for, uhh,  poor folks. Maybe they're afraid of poor folks because they uhh, tend to see through those Republicans and how all they want is to bomb other folks and want to see me fail."

No, Mr. President, we don't want to see you fail. We want to see you go. And we can hardly wait.




Tweet

Black Eye Friday

Black Friday is not without a number of black eyes across this great nation of ours as fights broke out in shopping malls across the country. Check out this video from Fox.

President Obama blames the brawling on the drastic changes in climate as temperatures soared into the high 30s and even the low 40s leaving no doubt that we are in for big trouble in the very near future unless we recycle and use paper in lieu of plastic.

At one mall in Florence, KY, two groups of teens went at it and a big kerfuffle broke out in front of a Forever 21 store, which coincidentally, matched the super high night time low-temperature. Video was taken of this incident which, for a change, had nothing to do with radical folks who have nothing to do with Islam. That's two "nothing to do's" in one sentence, so it must be a liberal factoid.

Elsewhere in the Bluegrass State, fists flew between two unidentified men at the St. Matthews Mall on Thanksgiving night as a crowd of fight-lovin' folks looked on. A woman who was simply looking to get a good deal of a flat-screen TV was knocked to the floor as the men fought, then finally a mall cop broke up the fracas. One of the brawlers was led away by people in the crowd and it is currently unknown if anyone will face charges.

At a Springfield, VA Best Buy, a woman was arrested the day before Thanksgiving after she attacked another shopper who was waiting in line for the store to open, police said. Apparently, the other shopper, had grabbed the last copy of "Hard Choices."

One man, a guy named Ahmad, was attacked by a woman with a chair after she tried to jump the line trying to get her hands on "Divorced Barbie." The doll normally sells for $350 but was going for $155. (The reason for the high cost is because it comes with Ken's house, car, and bank account.) The woman was later arrested after knocking Ahmad to the floor shouting "I'll Allahu Akbar your a$$, you terrorist bas#@rd!" 

So there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that as global temperatures soar, so do tempers. This is one reason Bernie Sanders and Barack Hussein Obama see climate change as the cause of terrorism and the world's biggest threat. The other reason is they happen to be idiots.

So don't forget to recycle, go green, and always remember: "if it's yellow let it mellow, but if it's brown, flush it down."

Hope you had a great Thanksgiving.

Hey! Give me that! I saw it first--it's mine.


Tweet

Obama: "I have spoken!"

Al, Lou, and Akbar

Our Supreme Exulted Monarch has decreed Wednesday that all "57 states" do not have the right to refuse potential Islamic terrorists (aka refugees) and if they go against his orders, the leaders of his caliphate will suffer the consequences.

The decree letter from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) tells American governors that they are not permitted to deny taxpayer money to provide services and benefits to refugees based on their country of origin or so-called religion of peace and otherwise. In other words, it used to be your money and your rights but now it belongs to Big Brother.

"Accordingly, states may not categorically deny ORR-funded benefits and services to Syrian refugees. Any state with such a policy would not be in compliance with the State Plan requirements, applicable statutes, and their own assurances, and could be subject to enforcement action, including suspension and termination."

Even Canada is smart enough to realize how most of these so-called "refugees" are men of military age, as well as the age that fits terrorist profiles. So Canada is only admitting families and women with children. 

But we don't profile in the USA because that would be politically incorrect. Instead, we have a president who is going against a significantly large majority of Americans who believe that the nation's security trumps political charity. 

Even many Democrats agree, except for the hard-line robots like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.

The ORR letter discussed the 1964 Civil Rights Act which prohibits discrimination based on race and national origin in all programs that receive federal funding. The Democrats like to take credit for the Act but while 6 Republicans opposed it, 21 Democrats also opposed it.

And speaking of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, you may recall a Democratic president, Lyndon Baines Johnson who discussed the '64 act with several southern governors. (WARNING: STRONG LANGUAGE.) 

Johnson is alleged to have said: 

"These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference . . . I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years."

Furthermore, Democrats like to say the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the brainchild of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but actually, it was an extension of the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts created by the Republican Party. Barry Goldwater, one of the six Republicans who voted against the 1964 version didn't like the idea that the 1964 version was totally Republican policy with Democrats taking the credit.

Back to the Syrian "refugees." Last week the House overwhelmingly approved a bill that would improve the screening for Syrian (and Iraqi) refugees. It would require a more comprehensive background check on every one of them before they can be admitted to the US and a certification that they do not individually pose a threat.

The ORR followed the administration's line saying Syrian refugees are subject to even more precautionary measures than other refugees, referring to the measures as "a multi-layered and intensive screening and vetting process involving multiple law enforcement, national security, and intelligence agencies across the Federal Government."

When Democrats have these "refugees" living in their neighborhoods, only then will I have a modicum of trust for their claims that they pose no danger to our citizens. But I will still wait eagerly for any possible repercussions that may occur based upon their poor judgment, as the results of those repercussions will impact directly upon them.

Tweet

Suicide bomber to ISIS: Badahbing!

Haifa, Israel-- President Obama not only has Russian President Putin to thank for going after ISIS, now he has Al Qaeda to thank as well. A suicide bomber blew himself to pieces and took out an ISIS brigade leader in the process.

The religious act of Islamic jihad too place in southern Syria showing just how much of a rivalry exists between ISIS and Al Qaeda.

May have been killed for looking Jewish

The exploded body parts hit the proverbial fan on the ides of November during a top-level meeting of the Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade. These bearded first cousins to camel dung are known for their bloody hold over much of the Golan Heights. Six of the top scumcrumpets were sent to meet their virgins, including Muhammad (really, who would've guessed that name?) "Abu Ali" al-Baridi, head of the group and also know by the sobriquet "The Uncle." This may have been due to all the intermarriages that take place among the more religious families of these pious men, and Abu was, indeed, their uncle.

Al Qaeda's Syrian affiliate, the Al Nusra Front, immediately took credit on Twitter calling the attack "heroic." Obama would have disagreed. He sees men and women who have their gender changed and strive to use toilets normally used for the opposite sex as heroic. He sees black gay basketball players as heroic. He sees traitors like Bowe Bergdahl as heroic.

"The Islamic State [ISIS], that controls the closest area to the Israel border in the Syrian Golan Heights, suffered a severe blow and lost its entire top command in the area in one fell swoop," said Alex Fishman, writing for Yediot Aharonot, an Israeli newspaper.

In spite of the fact that Al Nusra and ISIS share a common religion and common beliefs in jihad as part of that religion, and also both groups hate the same people, especially the Jews and everyone else not believing in Allah the same way they do, they are fighting the crap out of each other south of Damascus along the Israeli border. It's like junk yard dogs going at it while the cats cheer them on.

It took a while for word to get out about the bombing as it came around the same time as the Paris attacks. "We heard the sound of a strong explosion coming from the Baath Party headquarters in the village," said Abu al-Ezzam, a Jamleh resident and another Abu. "We ran to the place, and there were body parts scattered everywhere," Abu noted, speaking of the religion of pieces and what can happen to you if you're involved.

The Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade Tweeted a macho crotch-grabbing statement: "The martyrdom of the leaders will only make us more determined. Blood and sacrifice is welcome for God's sake."

Yes, they love their blood sport, don't they?



Tweet

"First they came for the tanks, then they came for . . . "

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--  Because I was not a Socialist.
  Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--  Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
 Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
 Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."                            Martin Niemoller

The Obama abomination is taking vehicles and equipment from law enforcement agencies across the nation. We can thank the Ferguson debacle to thank for this, as lawmakers and sheriffs believe that this action will put the officers and the communities they serve in danger.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) spoke to Fox News and said "These things are useful tools and the president taking them away will put more officers in jeopardy and at risk of harm or even death. I don't know how he can sleep at night knowing his actions will have those repercussions."

He can sleep at night because he has no problem with their being any repercussions--in fact, he uses racial or anti-cop repercussions as his divisive political tool. Also, if you slept next to Michelle, wouldn't you at least pretend to be sleeping?

Our so-called president issued the Executive Order 13688 in January 2014 after the Ferguson, Mo. riots due to concerns about the "militarization" of the police dealing a heavy-handed response to minorities in the process of trying to kill them.

And it should be crystal clear that if there's one thing Obama does not want as a response to violent behavior, is a heavy-handed response (see Syria, ISIS, and Russia, for examples of his light-handed, somewhat foppish [see the Urban Dictionary] responses).

If there is anything president Obama is good at, it's demoralizing the military, disrespecting the law and those with the task to uphold it, putting Muslims before Christians while denying the existence of 'radical Islam,' leading from behind--way behind, and refusing to stand with our allies, particularly Israel, and "Poo--the card game." Obama loves Poo.

After the 2001 9/11 attacks, America realized that if we wanted to fight this war on radical Islam, we would need the equipment to do so, and it would need to be dispersed throughout the country in order to have the means to deal with terrorism.

Well, now that Obama has declared ISIS the JV team and denies the existence of radical Islam, treating terrorism as if it were a crime being perpetrated by mere criminals, he wants to further remove our retaliatory capabilities should radical Muslims attack on our soil.

This proves to me that our so-called president has no intentions of beating ISIS or stopping the creation of a world caliphate. I know how "conspiracy theorist" this sounds, but I have yet to see an instance where Obama has shown the same respect for whites, Christians and Jews as he does for Muslims and people of color.

Thankfully, Mike Rogers will attempt to get the weapons and equipment back in the hands of law enforcement once our incompetent president is gone.

Tweet

If you don't comment, don't say anything

I want my readers to know that in respect of recent events, I will leave (below) a "safe space" where readers of color, gender challenged, or whatever you think is wrong with the way you think and/or do, can write whatever you would like. I will call this section of my blog "THE COMMENT SECTION" and you can find it in the comment section (below).

If it's good enough for the myriad of progressive college activists, those who are jealous of those of us who have lived during the 60s and know how cool it is to protest, then it's good enough for me. Not.

College kids actually having an idea of his or her own seems to be as common as a simultaneous lie-free day for Hillary and Bill Clinton. Suddenly, all across the nation, kids have independently became aware that black lives matter and white lives don't because of white privilege.

California's Claremont McKenna College official newspaper announced that it will be setting aside some of its column inches to give "people of color" an unfiltered voice in the media, according to Fox News.

"So for those who don't feel all the messages of solidarity are enough, or who feel the mainstream media is misguided in representing people of color, or who feel compelled to speak and be heard, we would like to re-purpose its influence by providing a space in next week's issue for students of color to voice their experiences," the Nov. 13th editorial in The Student Life stated. "We will proofread, but we will not edit your voice or content."

The reason they will need to proofread the comments is due to the caliber of English proficiency colleges are graduating of late. Not only are many students writing like grade schoolers, they have no sense of American or foreign history or current events. (Even Harvard graduate Barack Obama thought there were 57 states.) This is not a racist comment, by the way, because it has nothing to do with melanin.

I repeat, dear readers, if you would like to comment, please use the space my blog provides below to freely express yourself. I am particularly looking forward to people of color because we all know how stifled our society has made them--just ask Barack Obama.

Isn't it ironic how, for the first time in American history, we the people, elect our first black president--for two unfortunate terms--and this president has the audacity of dope to divide us along racial and political lines?

That was a rhetorical question.


Tweet

Clock Boy Sues for $15 million

Ahmed Mohamed, the 14-year-old Muslim kid with the clock that looked like a bomb, wants to make money from his staged event. It's his way of waging jihad, I suppose.

The little creep and his scumcrumpet family want $15 million in damages and also demand that several school officials bow down and kiss the youngster's butt in Macy's window just because Mohamed brought a homemade "clock" to school. A teacher, concerned about the welfare of non-Islamic human life, flagged the device because it looked as much like a clock as Mohamed looks like a prophet.

Naturally, our so-called president, Barack Hussein Obama, invited Ahmed to the White House with his "clock," and the Secret Service was able to determine upon close inspection that it was safe to bring into the same room as our fearless leader.

A letter was sent by one of Ahmed's fee-chasers to the school district saying "As American citizens, all of us--even the ones with 'Muslim-sounding' names like Ahmed Mohamed--are entitled to have public officials with whom we come in contact to respect our rights."

Nobody disrespected this kid's rights. If he were white, the school staff would have done the same thing--in fact, they have done so in the past in the state of Texas; nothing new there.

The kid was detained and held on suspicion and suspended by MacArthur High School. So, was he detained for his name of the device?

After Obama tweeted the kid, saying that he liked the clock's design, the kid contended that he built it to show his love of electronics. Of course it turns out that he purchased a pre-built clock and the whole thing was to gain attention just as his father has done in the past, with cries of Islamophobia.

The young jihadist's Tom Sawyers claim that the kid's name and likeness will be "forever associated with arguably  the most contentious and divisive socio-political issue of our time," but they have not counted president Obama's divisiveness, which clearly wins the prize.

After meeting with our Islamophilia POTUS at the White House, the kid's family said it was leaving the U.S. for Qatar, where spreading jihad is the national pastime.

Mohamed's shyster lawyers issued demand letters on Monday seeking $5 million from the Irving Independent School District and $10 million from the City of Irving. The also demand written apologies from the Irving ISD and the city's mayor and police chief.

(Many Muslims love to play the victim as they behead you for all the misery you cause in the world.)

The letter also claims that little Ahmed suffered "severe psychological trauma" and was harassed by officials, but the only trauma he really suffered comes from the religion of peace (like when your vest fails to work properly). That's why the funniest part of the mouthpiece's letter was the mention that Ahmed's "reputation in the global community is permanently scarred."

Here, have some clocks

Are you kidding me????

Ahmed now has street cred with all the jihadists around the globe. The only reputation that's scarred is his reputation of being a patriotic American. Why else would Obama invite this little jihadist to the White House? He never celebrates our patriots and their heroism--he blames them for all the misery in the rest of the world.

Ahmed Mohamed wasn't singled out because of his name for bringing a strange looking device to school and refusing to explain what it was. He was no more treated as a threat as anyone standing in the middle of a shopping mall and screaming "Allahu Akbar!"

That's Arabic for "cut and run."



Tweet

Will these attacks happen today?

You know them as Anonymous, a group of online activists who recently have vowed to fight against ISIS.

Yesterday, Anonymous said they discovered intel claiming ISIS plans an assault at the WWE Survivor Series event at the Philips Arena in Atlanta, GA on Sunday, today, at 7:30 pm EST. They also plan other attacks including multiple events in Paris and the hacker group lists them (see below).

Anonymous wrote in this statement: "The goal is to make sure the whole world, or at least the people going to these events, know that there have been threats and that there is possibility of an attack to happen. Another goal is to make sure Daesh knows that the world knows and cancels the attacks, which will disorient them for a while."

The list is as follows: 

1. Demonstration by Collectif du Droit des Femmes (Paris)

2. Concrete Invites Drumcode: Adam Beyer, Alan Fitzpatrick, Joel Mull at Concrete (Paris) 

3.  Cigales Electroniques with Vocodecks, RE-Play & Rawtor at Le Bizen (Paris)

4. Feast of Christ the King celebrations (Rome/worldwide)

5. Al-Jihad, One Day Juz (Indonesia)

6. Five Finger Death Punch (Milan)

7. Universal Pastoral Day (Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Lebanon)

Anonymous said: "We only appeared now because our goal was to remain undercover and report everything to the right authorities and let them take all the action. But when authorities do not take action, Anonymous does. This part of the op started last Monday and has [been] and will be active 24 hours a day as long as the op is going on."

The group said they have informed the CIA, FBI, MI5, and the Australian government. They have not released the proof they used to make their findings. Of course, it is entirely possible that the proof is bogus and they are being manipulated by ISIS. 

But who knows?

If the attacks happen, Anonymous is proven right. If the attacks do not happen, was it because Anonymous helped prevent them from happening?

Like I said, who knows?



Tweet

Obama the Poseur POTUS

President Barack Hussein Obama did his one finger Shahada-like pointing as he announced that the U.S.-led coalition "will not relent" in the fight against ISIS and believes that they will be defeated.

He's probably correct, but the defeat of ISIS will be in spite of Obama, not because of his so-called leadership.

The way things currently are, 75% of the time our fighter planes return without dropping any of their ordnance. And the fact that we fly so few sorties each day is obvious proof that Obama is sitting this fight out, waiting for his replacement to take over the task. 

Obama spoke at the close of the ASEAN summit in Malaysia, pressing Russian President Vladmir Putin to go along with him in the U.S.-led coalition, especially now that ISIS has been fingered as the group responsible for bringing down a Russian passenger jet last month, which killed all 224 people on board.

"He needs to go after the people who killed Russia's citizens," Obama said, referring to Putin.

Putin should have responded with "Sure, I'll go after ISIS without joining your make-believe military actions, and maybe you can go after Iran for refusing to release your citizens, Comrade Obama. You draw red lines line dog crap draws flies."

Obama said Moscow has been focusing on the rebel forces who are fighting against Syrian President Bashar Assad, a new ally to Putin. He called on Putin to make a "strategic adjustment" and stop supporting the chinless dictator, saying that as long as he remains in power, the violence in Syria will continue.

For those who aren't familiar with the term "strategic adjustment," it is the opposite of "strategic patience." The former requires action, the latter requires sitting back while pretending that the act of sitting back is doing something. Obama champions the latter.

"It will not work to keep him in power," Obama whined. "We can't stop the fighting."

Putin could very well have replied: "Comrade Obama, you drew that red line and you allowed Bashar to cross it. If you had the testicles you would have stopped him from gassing his people and your leftist followers would have a legitimate cause to take in those so-called refugees. But you chickened out and now you want Russia to clean up your mess. You better call on your Muslim Brotherhood friends and get them to help you out of this jam."

French President Francois Hollande will meet with Obama on Tuesday at the White House to discuss ways to fortify the fight against ISIS. But Hollande is smart enough to know that little effort will come from Obama because ISIS isn't part of the GOP, therefore, he will also meet with Putin in Moscow.


Tweet

What it's going to take to beat ISIS

A lot of people in the West believe that every Muslim ought to be either monitored, shipped off to another country (or planet), incarcerated, or killed. I don't think that's a good strategy because it's never going to happen and it will not solve the problem with Islamic terrorism.

The majority of Westerners also believe that more should be done by Muslims themselves, to help the world deal with the problem of Islamic terrorism. I happen to be one of those people, but I think many of us may not realize that there are some Muslims who are doing everything they can to dismantle and discredit this horrible jihadist ideology.

After the Paris attacks on Friday the 13th of this month, Muslim human rights activists (yes, they do exist) are fighting back against radical Islamic ideology and also going against those idiots who deny the relationship of the Islamic State to Islam.

Mohammed Amin, the chairman of the UK Conservative Muslim Forum, slammed the Muslim groups that refused to do anything beyond lip service, saying "condemning terrorism is not enough if you are unwilling to acknowledge its cause."

That takes spherical biological equipment.


Amin said that condemnations of terrorism from groups like Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Council of Britain left him "feeling frustrated--because they look so incomplete." He went on to add "I am utterly fed up with hearing people, both Muslim and non-Muslim, argue that the religious views of the terrorists are irrelevant."

It's about time someone of the Islamic faith spoke out like this.

Another activist, Maajid Nawaz said on Facebook that "None of us Muslims deserves an infantile pat on the back merely for condemning ISIS, which even al-Qaeda does."

Anti-extremism activist and journalist Felix Marquardt stepped it up a notch writing in The Telegraph that "We Muslims must hunt down these monsters who make a mockery of our religion." He called out Muslims who, like Obama and liberals in general, say that ISIS has "nothing to do with Islam," despite that this is the Muslim knee-jerk reaction, labeling it "dubious intellectually and altogether irresponsible to keep our reaction at that."

There are other Muslims, like Dr. Zudhi Jasser and Raheel Raza, the latter who implore both Muslims and non-Muslims to "connect the dots to get to the root of terrorism." She argues that "Since 9/11, the West has been waffling in the quicksand of political correctness and refuse to call a spade a spade."

Perhaps this is a start to how we can eventually defeat Islamic terrorism. We aren't going to do it by simply expressing our anger and only do what Trump promised: "I will bomb the shit out of them."

Yes, if we bomb them, then we ought to bomb the shit out of them and stop playing PC games with our rules of engagement. It prolongs war and increases the body count.

But I believe we need to show potential ISIS recruits and their ilk, dead jihadists, torn apart or burned to a crisp from our weapons. We need to make a horrible display, like they do whenever they behead one of our own, by being as graphic as they are. This is the reality they need to witness that might make them think twice before they go all 'guns n glory' on us.

In other words, we need to use shock and awe that will show them what losers they are.


Tweet

Illegal fun in the sun

Aruba may be "One Happy Island" but St. Maarten, also in the Dutch Caribbean, is becoming a Syrian tourist destination--especially for Syrians who travel on forged passports.

Authorities have detained three Syrians traveling with fake Greek passports. They have been held since November 14th and have not asked for asylum, but in spite of the fact that they did not sport bathing suits, swim fins, or fishing gear, they were not believed to be terrorists of the non-Islamic kind.

One happy POTUS

The illegal Syrian travelers arrived in St. Maarten on Insel Air flight from Haiti, and although no further details were available, President Obama still swears he will veto any bill that makes it difficult for anyone of the Islamic faith to be kept from coming to the U.S. He also said that he feels "offended that any island, Caribbean or otherwise, should be named after a Christian saint, after the terrible things Christians did to Muslims during the Crusades."

He then shouted "Allahu Akbar!" as journalists ran for cover.

Just teasing . . . the journalists didn't run.



Tweet

Belgium at Highest non-Islamic Terrorist Alert Level

Belgium--Americans were told to "shelter in place" after a warning by local authorities that an attack by terrorists, who aren't true Muslims and do not represent Islam, is serious and imminent.

The threat level is at "4" which rings the proverbial bell and warns that an attack can occur at any time.

The U.S. Embassy in Brussels, the capital of Belgium, ordered Americans to stay home as the city was placed on lock-down in response to the "non-Islamic" terrorist threat, and the national crisis center raised its "having nothing to do with religion" terrorism alert to its highest level as Belgium police look for a suspect in the Paris attacks that killed 130 non-Muslims.

Islamophobic checkpoint

The embassy said to Americans in a statement that "if you must go out, avoid large crowds," knowing that these terrorists not only look to kill non-Muslim individuals, (especially those of the genus American), but particularly try to kill as many of them as they can while mistakenly believing that Islamic jihad will get them into Paradise and "virgin-heavy" once they settle down and get a massage from the "young boys who never age."

The Embassy warning also urged U.S. citizens to "exercise caution in public transportation systems, sporting events, residential areas, business offices, shopping malls, [going to the toilet] and tourist destinations."

If you see something, say something. If you hear "Allahu Akbar!" duck, hide, or run like hell.

And remember, Islam is a religion of peace. The Islamic State is not Islamic, and the bad parts of the Koran do not count.


Tweet

DNC ad attacks GOP on term "radical Islam"

Awad quotes Sura 9:5 "Sura of the Sword"

The DNC (evidently standing for Department of Nut-jobs and Communists) has made an ad denouncing the GOP's use of the term 'radical Islam.' A post in mediaite.com "DNC Ad Attacking Republicans for Saying 'Radical Islam' Is Laughably Stupid" discusses the new ad.

The DNC is attempting to convince people, whose intelligence they have no respect for, that to use the term 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. This is as laughable as Bill Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman  .  .  .  Monica Lewinsky."

As pointed out by Robert Spencer, this move by the DNC is an attempt to make the willful ignorance of Islamic jihadist terrorism appear as if it's a virtue. Spencer argues: "The DNC claims that to say 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. That is tantamount to claiming that to say 'Italian mafia' is to assert that all Italians are mafiosi."

The DNC used George W. Bush, a president they've hated for his 8 years in office, as "exemplary" in his "denial of the nature of the jihad threat." You might notice Nihad Awad, National Board member of CAIR standing behind Bush nodding his head to Bush's dhimmie statement.

We know that CAIR is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. The MB was convicted of funding Islamic radical terrorism. They were not convicted of funding Muslim terrorism, as the DNC would try to convince you.

Derp

Most Americans, 56% of Democrats included, are clear that we are at war with "radical Islam." Only 24% of the nation agrees with our JV president, a man who says he is not a Muslim (as if he even believes that this would be a bad thing to be) but shows clear preference for Muslims over Christians, including in cases of immigration, cases where Christians are being killed by radical Islamists and deserve true refugee status.

It's clear that the DNC is run by people who are totally out of touch with the pulse of America (see Debbie Wasserman Schultz, for moron that).


Tweet

Pelosi calls herself a "lioness" while others call her something else

National terrorism expert, Nancy Pelosi, believes that when it comes to national security, she is a "lioness," and will claw the hell out of anyone who tries to harm one of her own cubs.The only exception she has is with Syrians whose backgrounds we cannot possibly check, and anyone else Obama allows into our great country.

Pelosi (her friends call her "Bo" as in Botox) has vehemently opposed a House bill, 289-137, meant to increase screening criteria of potential Syrian refugees, some of whom are likely to be terrorists as we have no data on these refugees and ISIS has promised to infiltrate the USA.

If you have a bag of 100 M&Ms, and 2 of them are poisoned, would you eat from the bag? A friend of mine suggested that example and I stole it from him--you can find his blog on my page--it's Quincy Quarry and it's about Quincy, Mass. I recommend it.

The bill mentioned above is the American Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act of 2015, and states that no Iraqi or Syrian refugee will be admitted in the US unless the FBI director "certifies the background investigation of each refugee" and the secretary of Homeland Security, the FBI director and the Director of National Intelligence "certifies to Congress that each refugee is not a security threat to the United States."

The DHS inspector general would be required to independently assess any approvals given to refugees.

What else does our government need to do other than insure our safety and take care of our infrastructure?

Two Republicans, who need to be voted out of office said "no." They are Reps. Walter Jones (N.C.) and Steve King (Iowa). Their objection was about the no amendments closed rule, but that still doesn't make them GOP material in my way of thinking.

Bo Pelosi was upset her left wingers didn't get to vote on a "better idea" amendment. The idea that Democrats could have a "better idea" about anything is like saying the Islamic State isn't Islamic and Islam is a religion of peace. " .  .  .  we have a responsibility to keep the American people safe. It's the oath of office we take. Count me as a lioness. Anybody comes near my cubs, you're dead," the tough lady from California warned organizations like ISIS and Al Qaeda.

Then she said, "We gotta let 'em all in to see if they're terrorists or not."

Okay, she didn't say it, but she's still the poster grandma for Bad Judgment.


Tweet