John Kerry vs a bag of rocks

Secretary of State John Kerry is a very stupid man. He's stupid because he thinks the American people are gullible and will actually believe what he just said about the media and terrorism.

Kerry wants people to be unaware of what's going on in the world of terrorism so that they don't band together and demand real action from the government. He doesn't want the public to take an honest look at the ideology behind jihad terrorism. For Kerry and the administration, it's better for them that the public is ignorant and complacent so that we don't question Obama's suicidal tactics dealing with the Islamic jihad threat that will obviously worsen as we take in more Islamic "refugees."

During Kerry's first official visit to Bangladesh and meeting with top government officials and maybe picking up a few casual shirts at a great price, he held a press conference at the Edward M. Kennedy Center in Dhaka.

There have been recent terror attacks in that country and Kerry addressed the problem of terrorism with a dramatic demonstration on how stupid he is but still is vastly overpaid. 

He preached about how the media could "do us all a service" by reducing coverage of terror attacks.

Shahada finger or his IQ

"Remember this: No country is immune from terrorism. It's easy to terrorize. Government and law enforcement have to be correct 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year," he said, using a tired, worn out cliche as if saying it for the first time. "But if you decide one day you're going to be a terrorist and you're willing to kill yourself [as if that's how Islamic jihadist think], you can go out and kill some people. You can make some noise. Perhaps the media would do us all a service if they didn't cover it quite as much. People wouldn't know what's going on."

Idiots applauded.

It sounds as if Kerry is taking his cues from the Hillary Clinton book on the media. The less we hear from them and deal with them the better.

In a free society we can laugh at John "Hair-plugs" Kerry because part of that freedom we enjoy is freedom of the press. People in power hate the scrutiny of honest journalism. Some, like Hillary Clinton, avoid it. Others like Kerry ask to see less of it.

It's getting progressively more difficult to understand how people who actually follow politics could consider voting for a liberal party who would shut down freedom of the press, free expression and our inalienable rights overall.




Tweet

ISIS tells India convert, pay up, or die

Imitating Obama's shahada finger-point

The Islamic State has warned India that "It is strictly prohibited to worship anyone except Allah. These Kafirs [non-believers] worship cow, sun, and moon. There is strict prohibition to maintain ties with those who are against Allah. Either accept Islam, pay Jizya (a medieval tax for non-believers of Islam) or prepared [sic] to be slaughtered. If the Indians claim themselves to be smart and intelligent, spending immense amounts of money in researching and trying to find out what we really want. Then I would like to let them know, that they have three options and they can choose one, they either accept Islam, pay jizya and be prepared to be slaughtered."

First of all, the jizya in not a medieval tax, it's a Qur'anic tax for all non-believers in Islam, especially for the Jews and Christians, known in the Qur'an as the "People of the Book." While this was intended originally for them, the Hindus are now cheerfully included in the Islamic carnage or pay off that would be inflicted upon them by the religion of peace.

Sura 9:29 says "Fight those who believe not in Allah and the Last Day and do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, and do not practice the religion of truth, even if they are of the People of the Book--until they pay the jizy with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."

Indian Muslim jihadists are talking about avenging the Babri Mosque destruction and the alleged Muslim killings across India. I would predict that heads will roll, but that goes without saying. 

Doesn't Islam remind you of organized crime? If not, what are the differences?



Tweet

Boko Haram has to go along with ISIS and all terror groups

Boko Haram and Shahada finger sign

The United States and our allies need to do something about this scourge, this horrific cruelty that's being carried out in many parts of the world, all in the name of Islam. 

Boko Haram Muslims firebombed huts killing 86 people in Dalori, Nigeria. There were children among those immolated in the attack and the atrocity was witnessed by a person who fled and hid in a tree.

Dozens of charred and bullet-riddled bodies were strewn in the streets from the attack, about 5 kilometers from Maiduguri, the place where Boko Haram first began.

Shahada finger sign

Beside the burning and shooting, there were explosions from three female suicide bombers, all with the belief that by killing infidels, they would attain Paradise (aka Jannah). The male suicide bombers get rewarded with 72 beautiful brown-eyed virgins, the females get rewarded with being close to their dead husband in the afterlife. 

Journalists who spoke to survivors afterward were told that help took too long to arrive from nearby Maiduguri, the military HQ for fighting Boko Haram.

Shahada finger sign

At least Hillary Clinton wasn't involved--nothing would get resolved.

This has been going on for 6 years and to date, the total dead is around 20,000 and millions without homes.

Boko Haram means "Non-Islamic education is a sin."

And killing people who are educated in a non-Islamic way is okay.

This must be stopped dead in its tracks before it's too late.


Tweet

Jim Kenney: "If it bleeds, it ain't Islam"

Philadelphia-- a police officer, Jesse Hartnett, was shot in an execution-style ambush, by Edward Archer, a Muslim man, who told police after his arrest that he shot the officer in the name of Islam on behalf of the Islamic State.

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Richard Ross told the media that the weapon used by Archer was stolen from a police officer's home in 2013.

Police are not calling the shooting a terrorist attack [because Archer forgot to yell "Allahu akbar!" or "my god is greater"] but the suspect told detectives "I follow Allah, I pledge my allegiance to the Islamic State. That is why I did what I did," homicide unit commander, Capt. James Clark, said.

Archer told them that he believes police enforce laws that are counter to Islam.

The suspect's mother said that he is mentally ill and Ross said that at this time they don't know if Archer was radicalized or tied to terrorism. "We will see where the investigation leads us," Ross said.

If he isn't tied to terrorism, what kind of Islamic attack was it?

Newly elected Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney (Democrat, naturally) said "in no way, shape or form does anyone in this room believe that Islam or the teaching of Islam has anything to do with what you see on that screen." He was referring to a police video showing the actual shooting.

During a press conference today, Kenney said, "this is a criminal with a stolen gun who tried to kill on of our officers, has nothing to do with being a Muslim or following the Islamic faith."

Methinks that Imam Kenney doth protest too much.

Archer's mother, Valerie Holliday, said her son was the eldest of 7 children and suffered head injuries from playing football and a moped accident. "He's been acting kind of strange lately. He's been talking to himself, laughing and mumbling." his mother said. "He's been hearing voices in his head."

I believe the prophet of Islam also heard voices, mumbled to himself, and cut off heads. 

Kenney demonsrates the "Shahada finger"

Ms. Holliday added that her son is a devout Muslim who has practiced the faith "for a long time."

So tell us, Imam Kenney, what part of Archer's actions fail to conform to Islamic jihad? Can you please help us all understand why he isn't practicing Islam the old fashioned way--the way that Islamic State practices it?


Tweet

Obama the Poseur POTUS

President Barack Hussein Obama did his one finger Shahada-like pointing as he announced that the U.S.-led coalition "will not relent" in the fight against ISIS and believes that they will be defeated.

He's probably correct, but the defeat of ISIS will be in spite of Obama, not because of his so-called leadership.

The way things currently are, 75% of the time our fighter planes return without dropping any of their ordnance. And the fact that we fly so few sorties each day is obvious proof that Obama is sitting this fight out, waiting for his replacement to take over the task. 

Obama spoke at the close of the ASEAN summit in Malaysia, pressing Russian President Vladmir Putin to go along with him in the U.S.-led coalition, especially now that ISIS has been fingered as the group responsible for bringing down a Russian passenger jet last month, which killed all 224 people on board.

"He needs to go after the people who killed Russia's citizens," Obama said, referring to Putin.

Putin should have responded with "Sure, I'll go after ISIS without joining your make-believe military actions, and maybe you can go after Iran for refusing to release your citizens, Comrade Obama. You draw red lines line dog crap draws flies."

Obama said Moscow has been focusing on the rebel forces who are fighting against Syrian President Bashar Assad, a new ally to Putin. He called on Putin to make a "strategic adjustment" and stop supporting the chinless dictator, saying that as long as he remains in power, the violence in Syria will continue.

For those who aren't familiar with the term "strategic adjustment," it is the opposite of "strategic patience." The former requires action, the latter requires sitting back while pretending that the act of sitting back is doing something. Obama champions the latter.

"It will not work to keep him in power," Obama whined. "We can't stop the fighting."

Putin could very well have replied: "Comrade Obama, you drew that red line and you allowed Bashar to cross it. If you had the testicles you would have stopped him from gassing his people and your leftist followers would have a legitimate cause to take in those so-called refugees. But you chickened out and now you want Russia to clean up your mess. You better call on your Muslim Brotherhood friends and get them to help you out of this jam."

French President Francois Hollande will meet with Obama on Tuesday at the White House to discuss ways to fortify the fight against ISIS. But Hollande is smart enough to know that little effort will come from Obama because ISIS isn't part of the GOP, therefore, he will also meet with Putin in Moscow.


Tweet