8 Questions That Aren't Funny

Juan Williams  of Fox News says the terrorists who bombed the Boston Marathon were not tied into any radical organization. Thus, we can view them in terms of "radical Islam." Obviously, Williams isn't counting Islam as a radical organization--the largest radical organization on earth--nor sees how the Koran, their marching orders, to be radical in what is written therein. .

Some of the thoughts I had about this bombing might sound offensive because they are ironic, which might be mistaken as humor, but I only mean the following to be sarcastic.

1. When Islam wins a battle, they often build triumphal mosques at the site where the battle was waged and won by them. Will the Muslim world now consider building a triumphal mosque on Boylston Street like they wanted to do at the Twin Towers sight? All they need to do is wait a few years until the heat is off them and Americans forget what it felt like on April 15th, when 3 innocent race spectators were killed and over 160 were maimed and otherwise injured severely.

2. In light of the Fort Hood shootings in 2009, where 13 people were killed by Nidal Hasan while shouting "Allahu Akbar," meaning, "My god is greatest," and President Obama had this incident labeled "Workplace violence," will he soon declare the Islamic terrorist attack to be "Sports place violence," and the injuries suffered, "Sports injuries?"

3. Since the latest terrorist attack happened in Boston, will the liberals blame it all on the Tea Party? While liberals consider cutting down a tree as terrorism, the English considered the Boston Tea Party an act of terrorism.

4. Will our talking about the Boston Marathon terrorist attack in terms of Islamic terrorism, will CAIR insist that we are merely being "Islamophobic" as if this is an actual phobia rather than a fear that is totally rational? 

5. Female DNA was found on pieces of the bomb. Does this mean that the pressure cooker that was the container for the bomb, once belonged to a female who used it for making basmati rice, sambar, or some other Indian food? Could it have belonged to a sales clerk?

6. Will terrorist #2 (I refuse to use his name) beat the death penalty, get out of prison after a decade or so, and write a book which will become a movie and make him rich? Will part of the movie earnings go to the Muslim Brotherhood and eventually come back to bite us? Will the movie be a Michael Moore documentary?

7. Will terrorist #2 be forced to repay the SNAP benefits he and his family were given if he, in fact, becomes wealthy from the movie about his life? Will Barack Hussein Obama play himself in the movie?

The people who were killed by these jihadist scum-bags will never get their loved ones back. The people who lost limbs, vision or hearing, will never be the same for the remainder of their lives. I hope we never forget and that we change our policies on Islamic terrorism and immigration. I am angry at how we've been doing business in the USA under Obama. Our enemies see us as impotent, weak, and all bark with no bite. Obama believes the FBI did all it could do, in spite of the Russian information they gave us about the terrorists, but "this is hard stuff," he added.

Sadly, I believe that terrorist #2 will not get the death penalty and will give us no real information in the war against jihad. (I don't call it the war against terror because it's pointless to have a war against a tactic rather than an enemy.) The terrorist, will have the very high profile lawyer, Judy Clark, to defend him and try to keep him from getting the death penalty. You and I will pay for her services, just as we did for the terrorist's family's welfare.

8. Finally, will we learn the truth about Benghazi before the movie on terrorist #2 is released? Obama promised to punish those involved, but Obama makes a lot of empty promises and I'm not holding my breath.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Holder Tells Us to Not Overreact to the Terrorists: Never Calls Them Muslims

Now Eric Holder is warning the American public to not react to the Boston terror bombing with violence against Muslims. I can't blame him--have you seen all the shootings, beheadings and stonings that have taken place since April 15th? You haven't? Wow, I wonder why.

Holder made these statements at the Anti Defamation League, an organization created to combat anti-Semitism. It's as if he's warning the Jews, the group most hated by Islam, Muhammad, and his cohorts, to not take revenge on the killings that Muslims have done and will continue to do in the name of Islam.

How appropriate is that--Holder talking to the public as if we're school children unable to contain violence against those who did violence upon our innocent public. If there's one thing you have to say about we Americans, it's that we are so non-violent against those who would kill us, that it's getting to look a lot like suicidal behavior. 

As time goes by, it's slowly being revealed that the momma of terrorist #1 and #2 has jihadist leanings. When she spoke on TV, she made it clear that if they killed her son, it would be okay; if they killed her, she would shout "Allahu Akbar," which means "my god is great"--implying that "my god beats your god." 

Initially, terror momma said that the whole affair was a setup--the blood of the victims was paint, and that we killed her son (sob sob). Not once did this vile woman show any sense of grief for those her sons killed. Unfortunately, Russia will not extradite her to face pending charges for theft against the very same store chain that video taped her sons planting their bombs, Lord and Taylor. We would have many questions to ask her.

Now that terror suspect #2 has been Mirandized, he's clammed up. We lost a great opportunity to learn more from him and we have Eric Holder to thank for that. Is it just me, or does it seem to you that Holder does everything he can to protect the wrong people? He uses the Constitution to the letter when it suits him, but when it comes to the 2nd Amendment in particular, and the Bill of Rights in general, he pretends that this great document is outdated.

Personally, I'd like to see Holder led out of office in chains to serve time in prison followed by all of those involved with the cover ups such as Fast and Furious, and Benghazi, just for starters. The chances of that happening are about as good as winning the Powerball Lottery while being struck by lightning while attending a converted Muslim's Bar Mitzvah.

Mazol tov.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Individuals Hell-Bent on Spreading Hell and Barry

Let's say that you are the leader of a land and there are a group of individuals that are hell-bent to kill your citizens. You want to protect these people because you are a good, kind and caring leader. A popular annual sporting event takes place where many thousands of people take to the streets to watch the athletes, but this year two of those individuals who are hell-bent to kill your citizens detonate two bombs that kill three people and injure many scores of bystanders.  Many have lost limbs, hearing and vision. They will be scarred for life.

Your dedicated law enforcement troops eventually find and shoots one of these individuals in a gun battle. His brother flees in a stolen car, dragging his brother fifty feet or more, finishing the job of killing him. Law enforcement eventually wounds and captures the other individual, and now you have the opportunity to find out whether there is more information that you can gather which may serve to prevent other individuals who, like these two, are hell-bent to kill your people. 

These individuals have been terrorizing your people and others around the world, for years. They wear no uniforms. In fact, they try to fit in and look like your people, dress the same way, shave their facial hair that is normally not done because they want to look like their prophet and maybe score a bunch of obedient wives as he did.  They are even willing to kill themselves in order to kill your people because to them, it is not death that happens when their vest bomb goes off and rips their bodies into pieces of meat that look anything but human--to them, it is eternal life in a place they call Jannah--paradise. This is a place where they can get 72 virgins, and even after having consummated their sexual lusts, these virgins once again become virgins. This is what they believe because their twisted scripture tells them so. And if you question their scripture, they might kill you.

So as leader of this land, what do you do about these individuals hell-bent on killing your people? If you are Barack Hussein Obama, you do nothing to point out why these individuals want to kill your people--this might upset those individuals and they might want to kill your people--wait, they already do, so why worry? Be honest. 

If you are Barack Hussein Obama, you never use certain words to offend them. Words like "terrorist" just sets them off on a random killing fest. You call them "freedom fighters." And what freedom are these freedom fighters fighting for? They fight for the right to rule your country and call the world their caliphate. They fight for the right to take away your rights and force you to pay them a tax, called a jizyah if you refuse to convert to their so-called religion. They fight for the right to kill you if you leave their religion or are gay, or commit adultery, or insult their concept of god--a god who hates Jews, Christians and all non-Muslims. 

And when they have taken over the world and only their god is the accepted one, only then will there be peace, and Islam will be the religion of peace.

So, Mr. President, do you really think it's wise to be politically correct or do you have a master plan you will not share with us?

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

The Boston Terrorist, Islam, and a Nice Jewish Hospital

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 19 year old Boston terrorist, is lying in an American hospital, ironically receiving care at Beth Israel, a Jewish medical facility. Dzhokhar, was the younger brother of the terrorist duo. His older brother, Tamerlan, age 26, died in a shootout with police and FBI, and was run over and dragged about 50 feet under the getaway car used by Dzhokhar, which obviously finished the job. 

In the meantime, the Muslim terrorist who killed 3 innocent people is being treated and kept alive in a Jewish hospital. Ironically, the Koran refers to Jews as being descendants of apes and pigs. Imagine how upset his father must be and those who helped train him knowing that the Jews have him--how un-Islamic. 

If he receives a civil trial, he will be dealt with in a civil manner--we will not give him the same fate as he gave 8 year old Martin Richard, Lu Lingzi and Krystle Campbell. There is no death penalty in Massachusetts--he will become a jail house star by his Muslim co-slammer dwellers.

Our government uses the term "Islamic Extremists." How very politically correct that is. One would think from hearing this term that being a jihadist, killing infidels, goes against the Koran--it doesn't--it only conflicts with the Mecca Koran, the early life of Mohammad, but follows the Medina Koran, that came later in life. And the Koran is very clear with its law of abrogation, that the stuff that came later, supersedes the earlier nicey-nicey stuff.  Thus, terrorism, killing the infidels, pleases Allah's blood lust, and this is not an Islamic extremist position; it is an Islamic religious position. In other words, a good Muslim is a better terrorist than a bad Muslim, which is not to say that bad Muslims love Jews and Christians any more than their Islamic counterpart, but they simply want that counterpart to do the heavy lifting. 

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Captured, Bleeding But Alive

They got him. Tonight, at around 8:40 PM in Watertown, MA, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev gave himself up to the police. He was hiding in a boat but he didn't have a paddle and the

boat was on land. He was taken to Massachusetts General Hospital bleeding and having a bad day.

Dzhokhar's father said the whole thing was a setup and the cops who killed his older son were cowards. He made no mention of his own kids killing an 8 yr old boy and two young women as well as injuring and maiming over 160 others. 

The suspects aunt, a loud woman who lives in Canada and claims to be a lawyer in her own land, said that she has no proof that these sweet young men did what they were photographed doing, and she ranted on about this.

The boy's uncle, living in Maryland, said that he should give himself up and ask forgiveness for what he did. He actually said he was proud to live in America and supported the efforts to capture his terrorist nephews. CAIR and other Islamic groups in North America, had no comment as far as I know, but if they did, they would have said that if they had a son, he would look like Dzhokhar. It should be noted that in Jordan, Islamic leaders were joyful of the carnage that took place at the Boston Marathon.

I think we ought to stop sending money to Islamic countries. All of them.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover           

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Boston On Lockdown

Well, one of the Islamic terrorists is dead; the brother of the 19 year old who's still on the loose. They came here about 10 years ago from Chechnya. The older brother, age 26, is dead, riddled with holes and shrapnel while his younger brother, Dzhokahar, is still out there--he's 19 years old. Authorities are asking residents of Boston and surrounding areas to stay at home if possible.

Dzhokar (pronounced "Joecar") Tsarnaev went to a prestigious school where he excelled in wrestling, and is currently at large. Fox News reports that he was a pre-med student.

An MIT peace officer was killed as he sat in his patrol car. This takes the total to four people killed for jihad.

I was not at all surprised to learn that these terrorists are Muslims; the fact that they placed one of the bombs next to an 8 year old child at the race, and were willing to randomly kill Americans, is often the jihadist signature. They are willing to kill infidels in order to selfishly attain Jannah, or heaven, for themselves.

Fox News wonders what we should call the terrorists. Should we call them domestic terrorists or foreign terrorists. After all, they've been in the United States for about ten years. I don't believe it's a question of where they come from to determine how they should be labeled; they're Islamic terrorists and geography cannot change that fact. 

When people are not insane, are Muslim, and are willing to kill and die for their beliefs, they have a more "spiritual" agenda. known as jihad. I hope we will recognize this for what it is and not stick our collective head into the sand like frightened ostriches. We must know who the terrorists are and not pretend they are otherwise.

As I conclude this article, Dzhokar is still out there with an "assault rifle" and explosives. I wonder how he was able to get them in Massachusetts, a state with the strictest gun control laws.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover          

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

More About Boston Marathon

Two men have been identified by the FBI as the probably scum bags who planted the bombs at the Boston Marathon. They are both carrying back packs, wearing baseball style lids with logos of some sort, and seem to be carrying a heavy load. They both have dark hair and the public is being asked to call the FBI if they know anything about these monsters.

Finding these men will be difficult, I believe. A good detective needs to be a bit paranoid--did the computer blackout of American Airlines have another meaning? Were any manifests ruined or erased in order to delete the names of the terrorists who  might have been on a flight? Highly speculative but possible. 

Conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones, claims that the government was behind the bombing. He said the same thing about 9-11 and just about anything else controversial of which you can think. There are no medications that can help a person as mentally ill as this idiot. I can imagine he'll have a lot to say about the West Texas fertilizer plant explosion near Waco, and somehow blame it on Bush while another conspiracy theorist will claim that he's blaming Bush to throw us off from Obama's culpability. And as I mentioned in yesterday's blog, there will always be some political hack who will find a way to make these tragedies an issue that will support their ideologies. Republicans sometimes do this, but Democrats have PhD's in dickwadism. 

My final thought for the day is that I was a bit disturbed how the crowd at the memorial service in Boston clapped at Obama's words and those of Gov. Patrick's. A memorial service isn't a place for applause, I think. Maybe you disagree, but I'm old fashioned that way.

I wish you all peace and love this horrible week.

Tweet

Three Horrors in One Week

The Boston Marathon bombing, ricin mailed to the president and several US Senators, and an explosion in a fertilizer plant in West, Texas near Waco that thus far has killed 15 people and injured about 160 others, has made for a horrible week in the USA. It has the feeling of the weeks following 9-11 in New York City. 

The crowd belted out a hearty singing of our National Anthem to start the Boston Bruins game, and this morning I tweeted: "I'm a New Yorker, this is not about baseball; we love you Boston." I believe I speak for the entire country in that tweet. 

This is not about politics, although some have tried to make it so; Barney Frank and Chris Matthews immediately come to mind. It is disgusting that they would do so, and I hope the liberals who listen to Matthews realize that his agenda does A  not trump events and maybe they will stop taking him seriously. Frank talked about how lowering the tax rate would not have helped these victims or prevented it from happening. The insensitive Frank forgot to mention that raising taxes would have done nothing to have prevented it either. 

David Sirota, a "journalist" for Salon.com, said he hoped the Boston bombing was committed by a white American--this would support his liberal agenda and take the onus away from Islamic terrorists. The sensitivity of this cretin and the others aforementioned is non-existent; they left their humanity at their mothers' breast. 

President Obama is at the memorial service in Boston this morning and the church bells are chiming "America the Beautiful." Let's hope that our memories aren't short about this. Let's hope we continue to sing our National Anthem with the same gusto they sang it in Boston. And let us find the terrorist killer or killers and bring them to the same justice they deserve and serve as a message to others about what their fates will be if they mess with US.

Tweet

Ricin a Roni

From the mouth of morons

I never liked Castor Oil as a kid--I imagine it must taste like a garbage can lid, but I bet Chris Matthews loves it; but I digress.

The president and several senators have received letters laced with ricin and fortunately, nobody was killed. As you may recall, Mr. Obama has food tasters who he would prefer die in his stead should his food be poisoned, and the post office has sophisticated methods of detecting toxic substances in the mail. The FBI had a press conference tonight stating that they believe they caught the person who sent the letters. As Martha Stewart says about apple pie, "It's a good thing." I'm certain this gentleman will do some seriously hard time.

Ricin Communis

Just a short while ago, there was a serious explosion at a fertilizer factory in Waco, Texas and there were injuries. I suspect this is not connected to the Boston Marathon bombings and the ricin incident, but what horrible coincidences to experience so close chronologically. We seem to be going to hell in a hand basket.

Tweet

The Saudi Student and Deportation: fact or fiction

As you probably know, there was a Saudi national, a student, who was running from the scene of the explosion at the Boston Marathon, and was tackled by a bystander. The Saudi is a 20 year old student studying English, we were told, but we later found that that he was no longer considered a suspect. A lot of stories came out throughout the day where it was confirmed that a suspect was arrested, only to be later denied by the FBI. There was a media frenzy that seemed to get out of hand.

So it is with caution that I report that Steve Emerson, a terrorism expert who runs the website Investigative Project on Terrorism, and is said to have many contacts in law enforcement, said that the Saudi national is being deported back to Saudi Arabia. This was made public and brought to my attention on The Hannity Show on Fox News Network tonight.

Now there are questions we need to consider regarding this story. The first question, is this story true, and if it is, why is he being deported? Assuming it's true, the only reason I can surmise that they would deport him is if he was somehow involved in the terror bombing and due to our relationship with his country, and to avoid risking embarrassment over the situation, they want him out of the picture. 

Remember, earlier in the day, the media was reporting that there was an arrest made. Later it was denied. Is it possible they learned the Saudi student was involved, planned to arrest him, but instead, decided to deport him? In the interim, perhaps there was an information leak about the arrest. I don't know, and obviously nobody is talking.

Again, everything is speculative and I have no more information than the rest of the public. I just wanted to put some thoughts out here for you to consider. I certainly hope our government would not let any perpetrator of such a heinous crime, and horrible act of terrorism, be allowed to go unpunished, no matter which damn country he comes from.

Tweet

The Latest on Boston Marathon

It seems that most people who are not at the office today (me included), have been glued to their TV sets to follow this horrific story about the Boston Marathon bombing. Those of us from New York City, in spite of being rabid Yankee fans, feel the pain of those who are suffering and the incredible sadness for the families of those who died in the cowardly murders.

1:52 PM: Fox News has just reported that there is a suspect in the bombing who is about to be placed in custody. WFXT in Boston, a Fox affiliate, had marathon video along with video from Lord and Taylor's surveillance camera. 

1:56 PM: an arrest has been made, Fox confirms. Now the big question remains for the public: who is this guy? I have to admit that I hope the guy is a Muslim because if it's home grown terrorism, that would be horrible. If it's a Muslim on a jihad mission, that might wake up the liberal ostriches with their heads buried in their butts. But even if he isn't a Muslim, al Qaeda and most of the Islamic world is passing out candy in celebration of the fact that Americans were killed. 

The youngest victim: RIP

If they Mirandize this guy, we'll never get the intelligence we need to find out more about this bombing. They need to wait to do this, or not do it at all. I say give him a military trial, but water-board him first, just to relax him and get him to talk about the bombs and B-B's.

2:10 PM: CBS claims that no arrest was made. (Maybe Rather should be in Philadelphia.) I trust CBS with telling the truth as much as I trust Obama with my wallet. But perhaps I'll have to eat crow in a little while if it turns out they're correct. I hope not--it's probably just wishful thinking on their part (which is incredibly cruel of me to say so, I admit).

2:22 PM: The status of the crime is still unclear--it's beginning to look a lot like a royal cluster coitus. 

So we shall see what develops and whether I'll be eating crow. 

Stay hungry, my friends.

Tweet

Liberals Label, Lie and Expect Little From Obama

Words have power. Liberals know this and are better than conservatives at using words to win arguments. Maybe they're better at it because we conservatives are nicer people so we don't fight back hard enough. It's like when someone that I know lies to me--I often believe the lie; not because I'm gullible, but because I don't tend to lie so it's almost taken for granted that others feel the same. So I'm not gullible yet maybe I'm naive. (Liberals would say I'm stupid, but I'll discuss name-calling later).

When a liberal wants to argue about, say, gun control, she, he or it, (say that fast and leave off the word 'or') will say that if you don't believe in gun control, you want kids to be killed, or simply don't care if they are murdered by guns. If you don't believe in abortion on demand, liberals accuse you of not believing in a woman's right to choose. Clever use of words. Conservatives need comebacks to these nonsensical claims. I would suggest you discuss the rights of the child they want to kill with abortion, while discussing the facts about gun control and how useful it is in stopping school shootings.

But I've yet to meet a liberal who'd let facts stand in the way of her feelings, or deter her from calling you a racist every time you disagree with the president. If you disagree with Obama, that doesn't make you a racist. If you see nothing that he is doing wrong with our country, that makes you a racist of low expectations. Only Obama was re-elected for a second term with an economy and employment rate that is this incredibly poor--no white president ever was--that's racism of low expectations. And what do we call black people who voted for Obama "because he is black,"? When you vote for someone based on skin color, that's just as racist as voting against someone based on skin color.

Tweet

Boston Terrorist Attack

If you see something, say something. That really sounds good. It sounds like we with all the eyes, are going to find all the terrorists with all the bombs, and prevent what happened in Boston from happening. But it happened and with all our eyes, we were not able to say something to stop it. Slogans can be so comforting though, can't they?

President Obama spoke for a few minutes a little while ago and said nothing new. He vowed to find the person or people who did this, and extract justice. One wonders if justice would be via civil court if it ever gets that far. One wonders if justice will be merely the words without the actions, much like Benghazi, much like OJ Simpson's mystery killer claim.

6:45 PM: the White House does at this time believe the Boston bombings were an act of terrorism, but the president has not yet declared that because he's being cautious--I don't blame him. But I will blame him if it is discovered that this was, indeed, an act of terrorism (of the Islamic persuasion) and he white washes it like Benghazi. 

I am a native New Yorker and remember 9-11 vividly. In fact, I worked as a psychotherapist with 9-11 victim's families. I was just going into session when the first plane hit--we all thought it was an accident. When the second plane hit, we all knew it was terrorism. In Boston, the runners knew by the second explosion that it was terrorism--the first responders were fantastic. People lost arms and legs, two were killed. And I just learned that one of the dead is an 8 year old child.

America is resilient, but we are sometimes too forgiving. If anything positive can come out of this, I hope it will be that liberals open their eyes and say something, but I hope they will say something different from what we're accustomed to hearing from them. It is time for us to react to these attacks and show the terrorists what real terror can look like.

Tweet

Boston Marathon Bombings

Monday, April 15th, 2013, Patriot Day.  

4:50 PM: At about 2:50 PM during the running of the Boston Marathon, two bombs went off within a minute of each other. Two people at this count, were killed, and 23 injured. Late word states that a third device has detonated at the John F. Kennedy Library at around 4:00 PM. One man at present, is in custody. The two who were killed, were decapitated by the explosion. 

5:15 PM: Hotels in the area have increased their security. The White House Secret Service staff have pushed back the barricades away from Pennsylvania Avenue, keeping observers a safe distance from the building.  Police are asking people to stay home and if they have to be out, to stay away from large groups. One person of interest, a man with severe burns, is being held by police. At this time, we are not certain if he is a victim or a terrorist. There is a Penske truck that is surrounded by the police, and we are not yet clear what involvement it has in the tragedy.
: 
Cell phone service has been shut down to prevent any more devices from being detonated via cell phone. This may indicate that the bombs were detonated in this manner.

5:26 PM: It was just learned that the JFK Library incident was actually not related to the bombing but was the result of a fire.

If this turns out to be an Islamist attack, will Obama call it "sports place violence"? If it is not an Islamic attack, will Muslim jihadists feel sad for the victims?

Tweet

Cuban Rap Song on Jay-Z Beyonce Visit

They lived in the ghetto and had their ghetto gear, 
They tripped out to Cuba; Obama he knew where. 
They met with Raul, Fidel and poor folk too, 
People with no freedom, not even food or shoes. 

Jay-Z flashed his cash and Beyonce, she felt fine,
While Obama stayed home and he partied on our dime.
Jay-Z and B saw Cuba like they were a king and queen
While Raul could only smile at the money he had seen.

Obama likes to party, Michelle she likes it too,
But pay for it they do not like we all know this is true.
Jay-Z he was happy that he really did some good
But this was only Cuba with no Muslim Brotherhood,

"Hello, My Fellow Commies"

Tweet

Everything is Our Fault, Not Obama's

The sequester, while it was the brain child of Barack Hussein Obama, is not his fault. It is the fault of Republicans because, well, it just is, so there you go. Because of the cutbacks ordered by the sequester, the Blue Angels, the Navy's precision flying team, cannot perform, the White House cannot remain open for public tours, cancer patients cannot get the chemotherapy drugs they need and might therefore die, over a million federal workers will have to take unpaid furloughs, and James Clapper, the Director of Intelligence, warned that the sequester will leave us more vulnerable to terrorism. (I used to think that our not calling it Islamic terrorism or identifying the real cause of terrorism made us more vulnerable to it). 

In fact, due to the sequester, all fun things you can think of that is under the auspices of the federal government is cancelled until we on the right of Obama's leftists, give in to his demands.  What's next, flushing toilets? But what isn't next are Obama vacations and golfing, and Biden spending about half a million dollars a day for his hotel stays with his staff.

Benghazi was not the fault of Obama--he was too busy with other matters when he heard about the attack. It was the fault of that video guy--you know, the guy who made that horribly accurate, albeit crummy video, about the prophet of Islam . . . you know who I'm talking about . . . starts with the letter M, but if you say his name without adding some Arabic mumbo jumbo, you might get killed on YouTube. So Benghazi definitely wasn't Obama's fault--he went back to sleep knowing he had people that would handle it. You can't hold someone responsible for something that happened when they were asleep when it happened.

Solyndra, that solar panel company that went bankrupt after Obama gave them hundreds of millions of our tax dollars, wasn't his fault. It was our money so it must be our fault--simple math.

Fast and Furious, where our government supplied guns to Mexican drug cartels, wasn't Obama's fault, nor was it the fault of Eric Holder, the head of the DoJ. You remember Holder, he's the man who did nothing to indict the New Black Panthers for keeping white voters away from the polling place in Philadelphia. No, Fast and Furious was something that George W. Bush did first, (although not the same way, nor did the guns walk away, but that doesn't count), and GW is a Republican, so it's the fault of the GOP--not the fault of Obama. It's never his fault because rock stars can do no wrong.

The economy is definitely not Obama's fault. He has only been president for a little over one term and it takes a long time to straighten out what that guy, George W. Bush did to this country. The unemployment numbers have improved if you don't count those losers who gave up looking for a job, and if push comes to shove, Obama can just print more money. The only problem is that we may soon run out of material to make the actual physical money: linen and cotton; but maybe if that happens, we can just go to paper until we run out of trees.

The Chevy Volt gets a couple of miles on an overnight charge, and less if you're in a hurry. But don't blame Obama for saving GM, blame us for not buying the car that is so green it will save the planet (if you don't count the fact that the electricity it takes to charge it comes from generators that run on coal and other fuels that aren't so green).

Obamacare isn't Obama's fault, he says, and nobody can challenge that claim because nobody fully understands it. Just don't get sick.

Tweet

Weapon Control and Idiots

If you're going to try and legislate gun laws it might be a good idea to know what a gun is. Of course, if you were in the military, you never called a weapon a "gun," because one is for shooting and one is for fun, as they say, but you get the drift.

How Liberals See All Guns

Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, a Dumbocrat, hasn't a clue of what a gun is, much less what a "magazine" is, and she has even less of a clue as to how they work--but she wants to be able to regulate them. She couldn't regulate her house thermostat. Here's the dimwit's quote: ”I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”

Let us pray that people of the lawless pursuasion do not figure out that once their weapons magazine is spent of bullets (military guys know them as "rounds"), they can go to the bullet store and buy refills, just like they can for their ballpoint pens.

And let's not tell New York Govenor Cuomo that it's generally a bad idea to legislate the police out of their guns while doing nothing to stop those who might use guns to put holes in them with illegal firearms. He had to repeal his own law--the greenies must be upset about his waste of trees.

Now we have a scary term that sure to frighten the bejeezus out of folks from the left: "ASSAULT WEAPONS." These are scary looking rifles, generally semi-automatic, but they look like they can take out a platoon of Recon Marines and SEALs, and whenever a gun control advocate sees one, she or he experiences the vapors and may swoon uncontrollably. But what is an assault weapon really? Aren't all weapons assault weapons? The term is used by the left to make semi-automatics sound like granade launchers, flame throwers, and bazookas (that would be a 3.5 mm rocket launcher to you ex-marines).

If just one teacher, janitor or administrative staff had a firearm at Sandy Hook on that fateful day, Adam Lanza would not have been able to kill as many as he did. The number of rounds in his weapons had nothing to do with the number of innocents slaughtered. It was the fact that there was nobody able to retaliate. No gun control law would have done anything to have stopped him--only a firearm would have.

The problem is not gun control laws. The problem is mental health issues and the way violence has become part of our entertainment in the movies and videos. The problem is also the idiots who refuse to actually look deeper into what may be the causal stimuli to the violence because the entertainment industry makes huge financial contributions that keep these idiots in power.

Tweet

"I'll Have Gum and a Box of Day After Pills, Please"

Good news for pedophiles, their victims can now buy the "Day After Pill" of Plan B pill if they accidentally impregnate them. That means a pedophile can surreptitiously send his eleven year old victim into the pharmacy to buy bubble gum and the Plan B pill without a prescription, and nobody needs to be the wiser.

Of course the eleven year old doesn't need to be the victim of a pedophile to make this purchase, she can do it with her allowance money if her playmate, let's call him Little Johnny, happens to get her pregnant or believes she might be from their after school antics.

So why did a federal judge make this decision? You make the call.

Tweet

Joe Biden Biding His Time, Saving His Money

There is nobody in the Obama administration who I feel more sorry for than Joltin' Joe Biden. He has a tough decision to make; a decision that he will wrestle with every night in his dreams until he decides what he is going to do.

The decision whether to follow suit of the empty suits and take a symbolic cut in his salary like Obama, Jack Lew, and others have taken to show us peons how gracious and sympathetic they are to the government lay-offs due to the sequester that Obama put forth. 

It sounds like a huge coincidence that so many under Obama have decided to forgo part of their incomes, but I suspect that they'll make it up with the other perks we taxpayers give them. But Joe is having difficulty saying yes to the cut for himself. After all, his wife, Jill, is a physician and makes only slightly more than minimum wage with the Obamacare regulations, and Joe, well, as Vice President (a job he took only because he thought he'd get to deal with vice and the women who make it so), is only $379 thousand, an amount he considers only middle class. And how can we blame the guy when he spent more than that in hotel bills in one day just recently? 

No wonder he only gave about $5540 in charity last year--poor guy. Now they want him to take a salary cut? Sheesh.

Tweet

Illegal Aliens and the "Journalists" Who Love Them

As the saying goes: calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist. Words have meaning; words count.

Time Marx's On

Jose A. Vargas, a former Washington Post reporter, was one of the first who cried out against calling illegal aliens in that term. Instead, he openly declared himself an "undocumented immigrant," and the leftist press cheered him on. According to Michelle Malkin,(The Open-Borders “Journalists” Who Banned “Illegal Immigrant,” Creator's Syndicate, 2013) however, Vargas had fake documents up the wazoo, including a fake passport with false name, fake green card and a Social Security card that his grandfather doctored for him. Guess documenting runs in the family--illegal documents, that is. 

The Associated Press (Ass Press, for short), has taken the term "illegal alien" out of its  style book. You can't say "an illegal" either, unless it's in a direct quote.

Malkin believes that there may soon come a time when "border crossers, illegal visa overstayers, illegal deportatoin evaders, document fraudsters and illegal alien traffickers are referred to as "our fellow Americans." Without the quotation marks. Mark my words."

So, as long as we're not going to call people who cross the US border from a foreign country without documentation and who are breaking US law, illegal aliens, why should we call people who supposedly report the news in a fair, balanced and unbiased way, "journalists" when it's obvious they are merely shills for the vast left wing conspiracy? As Jay Leno said, "they will no longer be called 'illegal immigrants", they will now be called 'undocumented Democrats." Many a truth has been said in jest.

Tweet