CBS fires top lawyer: no sympathy for Vegas victims

The face of hate

Politics has gotten to the point where it's crazy and the people who define the opposite side of the aisle as 'evil' are mentally ill. I'm primarily speaking about Democrats, because that's how they see Republicans.

Hayley Geftman-Gold, a top lawyer for CBS, bragged that she is "not even sympathetic" to victims of the Vegas shooting because "country music fans often are Republican" [and when they aren't they should be killed for liking country music, I suppose] when she spoke about the tragic shooting Saturday night that left at least 58 dead and 500 wounded or injured.

This woman is CBS's vice president and senior counsel. Can you believe she took to Facebook after the gunman opened fire at the Route 91 Harvest Music Festival in Las Vegas.

"If they wouldn't do anything when children were murdered I have no hope that Repugs [sic] will ever do the right thing," the asshat wrote in a now-deleted message that was first captured and reported by the Daily Caller. 

The heartless sicko went on: "I'm actually not even sympathetic bc [sic] country music fans often are Republican gun toters [sic]."

Her reference is probably regarding the Sandy Hook shooting, in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012, in which Adam Lanza, 20, killed 20 children and six adults. The solution to these horrible shootings, in the minds of liberals, is to have tougher gun control laws.

How's that working out for Detroit and Chicago? Their laws are among the toughest in the country and these cities are among the highest gun-related homicide rate in the country.

And the guns that are guilty of murder, used by the gang-bangers, are illegal handguns, not 'assault weapons.'

Geftman-Gold has worked for CBS since 2016 and is a graduate from Columbia University law school in 2000, according to her LinkedIn bio. Evidently, the standards at Columbia have come way down--one need not be a Republican to think that there's something wrong with her thinking.

The heartless Hillary Clinton lover doesn't work directly for the network's news division and a company spokeswoman told Fox News that "CBS is looking into the matter."

Yes, CBS has to look into whether it's okay to say you have no sympathy for dead Republicans. I wonder what they'll decide--I can't wait.

Obviously, Geftman-Gold has the right to say whatever horrible thing she wants, just like the idiots on their NFL knees do, but their employers do not have the obligation to forgo any consequences they deem appropriate for such callousness and stupidity.


Tweet

Suing the Company that Grew the Banana You Slipped On

The Second Amendment is under attack as usual. Nine families of those killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, which occurred in Connecticut two years ago, filed a lawsuit Monday against the manufacturer of the AR-15 Bushmaster rifle and Riverview Gun Sales, the shop that sold the weapon used in the shooting by Adam Lanza. In all, 26 people were killed by Lanza, including his mother. It is truly a tragedy.

The claim being made is that the weapon was designed for the military and should not be available to the public because it is unsuited for hunting or home defense. This, of course, makes it the perfect weapon for what the U.S. Constitution meant for citizens regarding the right to bear arms. It has nothing at all to do with hunting and everything to do with the tyranny of a government that wishes to run roughshod over the people.

Why We Conservatives are Just as Wrong on Gun Control Issues

Scrape the paint off a liberal and you'll find an undercoating of denial thicker than Michael Moore's bacon, lettuce, tomato, more bacon, ham and cheese sandwich. I'm talking about their denial about guns, and the people who kill people with guns. But they aren't the only ones who make a case that gun violence is the result of the opposing political party. Conservatives can also be guilty of making artificial claims that it's the liberals who are the lunatics who actually do the shooting of the innocents., but not only is this not always the case, it isn't even the issue. Let's look at a document I got from a conservative with all the right intentions regarding the Second Amendment. I am going to quote it directly but I cannot provide a source for the original as it appears as a jpeg in her posted photos:

--In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.
--In 1964 a  communist turned Democrat killed John F. Kennedy.
--In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
--In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
--In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Representative Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
--In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
--In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people in a school.

Weapon Control and Idiots

If you're going to try and legislate gun laws it might be a good idea to know what a gun is. Of course, if you were in the military, you never called a weapon a "gun," because one is for shooting and one is for fun, as they say, but you get the drift.

How Liberals See All Guns

Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, a Dumbocrat, hasn't a clue of what a gun is, much less what a "magazine" is, and she has even less of a clue as to how they work--but she wants to be able to regulate them. She couldn't regulate her house thermostat. Here's the dimwit's quote: ”I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”

Let us pray that people of the lawless pursuasion do not figure out that once their weapons magazine is spent of bullets (military guys know them as "rounds"), they can go to the bullet store and buy refills, just like they can for their ballpoint pens.

And let's not tell New York Govenor Cuomo that it's generally a bad idea to legislate the police out of their guns while doing nothing to stop those who might use guns to put holes in them with illegal firearms. He had to repeal his own law--the greenies must be upset about his waste of trees.

Now we have a scary term that sure to frighten the bejeezus out of folks from the left: "ASSAULT WEAPONS." These are scary looking rifles, generally semi-automatic, but they look like they can take out a platoon of Recon Marines and SEALs, and whenever a gun control advocate sees one, she or he experiences the vapors and may swoon uncontrollably. But what is an assault weapon really? Aren't all weapons assault weapons? The term is used by the left to make semi-automatics sound like granade launchers, flame throwers, and bazookas (that would be a 3.5 mm rocket launcher to you ex-marines).

If just one teacher, janitor or administrative staff had a firearm at Sandy Hook on that fateful day, Adam Lanza would not have been able to kill as many as he did. The number of rounds in his weapons had nothing to do with the number of innocents slaughtered. It was the fact that there was nobody able to retaliate. No gun control law would have done anything to have stopped him--only a firearm would have.

The problem is not gun control laws. The problem is mental health issues and the way violence has become part of our entertainment in the movies and videos. The problem is also the idiots who refuse to actually look deeper into what may be the causal stimuli to the violence because the entertainment industry makes huge financial contributions that keep these idiots in power.

Tweet

An American Tragedy

Newtown, CT: Adam Lanza, twenty years old, woke up this morning, got his mother's gun and shot her in the face, killing her.  Then he went to the school where she taught and began shooting the children from her class.  Eighteen children died outright and two more died in hospital, and six adults were dead when it was all over.

Lanza used weapons that belonged to his mother, and they were legally purchased.

So what we know is that the shooter shot his mother in the face, then killed the children she loved, and then he shot himself.

I believe that this is not a matter about gun control.  This isn't political.  This is becoming a serious societal issue having to do with the devaluing of human life and the media's glorification of violence.  My heart and prayers goes out to the parents of the children and families of all the victims, whose shock is unimaginable, and whose grief has to be boundless.

Please have the sensitivity to not make this political and keep it in perspective--it was the act of a seriously mentally ill person, an act that needs to be better understood to prevent a recurrence; not to ratify or support a political agenda.

Tweet