Islamophobia avoided: Texas migrant arrives at elementary school in tactical gear, gun, released from jail

What could possibly go wrong? You don’t want Texas authorities to do something “Islamophobic,” now, do you?

An Iraqi-born man who was arrested after entering a Texas elementary school clad in tactical gear and carrying a gun has been released back onto the streets, because nothing says "all is well in the neighborhood" like letting a guy who decided to cosplay as a one-man tactical response team inside a building full of kids walk free on bond.

Kyle Najm Chris, aka Muhi Mohanad Najm, showed up at Zwink Elementary School in Spring, Texas, last Tuesday and walked into the front office wearing a load-bearing vest, a taser, and a holstered firearm, according to court records. Chris, who became a naturalized United States citizen in 2022, was arrested Wednesday and charged with possession of a prohibited weapon, a third-degree felony.

The 39-year-old has since posted his $75,000 bond and was released from custody Sunday, according to court records.

Chris allegedly walked into the school’s front office in tactical gear with a holstered firearm after another visitor failed to close the door behind them. A school employee asked Chris how he got in, and he told her the door was unlatched. [Security much?]

Chris also asked if there was armed security on school property, according to court documents. He was asked to provide an ID, but didn’t give one, nor did he identify himself. Chris soon left the school and drove away. Perhaps this was a test-run, but for now, we don't know his true motive.

Chris had a private investigator license and a Texas concealed handgun license, but did not have any ties to the school, according to local news outlet KHOU.

Chris is required to be under 24-hour house arrest with a GPS monitor and is banned from going near any Klein ISD property, according to Fox 26. It's unknown if his firearm was left in his possession, but fearing Islamophobia, it's quite possible. 

Ah yes, house arrest with an ankle bracelet. Because the same system that thought it was a great idea to let this gentleman stroll around an elementary school looking like he was auditioning for a low-budget action flick is now confident that a little electronic jewelry and a stern "stay away" note will keep everyone safe. They forgot to wag their finger at him and admonish him with strong words.

What’s the worst that could happen? He decides to test the perimeter? Or maybe he just needed directions to the nearest tactical surplus store. Either way, the kids are definitely safer now that he's chilling at home plotting . . . whatever it is guys in full tactical gear at elementary schools plot when they're not being "Islamophobic"-ed by overzealous law enforcement. 

Sleep tight, Texas, the system's got this. And if you believe that, you might also believe that cows don't fart and snakes have hips.

Hey guys--thanks for following me. Consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. You can even Buy Me A Coffee if you want. No pressure.

Tweet

CAIR & Muslim Brotherhood Money Laundered Taxpayer Dollars To Run Thousands of Muslim Candidates in America

CAIR protest at Jewish seminar in Chicago

Holy moley, folks. The mask is OFF. Fox News just dropped a nuke on CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood, and if you still think this is some fringe "Islamophobia" conspiracy theory after this, you're either brain-dead or on their payroll.

They're not just "community organizing." They’re running THOUSANDS of Muslim candidates for public office across America because that's where the real power is now: city councils, school boards, state legislatures. You take those, you own the country from the ground up.

And how are they bankrolling this stealth jihad? By laundering your taxpayer dollars, of course. "What CAIR did in California that's under investigation, they took money purportedly for Afghan refugees, helped less than 200, took half of that $7 million and put it back in their own organization. They're disclosing only small fractions of their lobbying, which they're then using to finance and support radicals on campus. So they are subverting our academic institutions in line with their Islamist goals."

Always swords or rifles 

Straight-up grift. Seven million in federal cash supposedly for refugees → fewer than 200 actually helped → millions funneled right back into CAIR's war chest to fund campus jihadis and buy politicians. And while the feds are actively investigating this scam in California, they're still getting federal funds. Because nothing says "accountability" like rewarding open fraud.

"They're using hundreds of nonprofits, charities, student groups, professional societies, undermining local government, putting in politicians that are sympathetic to their views or openly acolytes and modifying and changing our democracy. That's happening here in the United States, too. And while CAIR was being investigated in California, it's still receiving federal funds."This is the Muslim Brotherhood playbook on steroids. And they've never hidden it:

"The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s mastership of the world."

Remember when anyone pointed this out and we got called bigots? Remember when we showed you their own documents and the media smeared us as 

"hate mongers"? Yeah, about that…

For decades we’ve been screaming from the rooftops while the same people now clutching pearls called us racists. Meanwhile CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest Hamas terror-funding case in U.S. history, kept getting invited to the White House, kept getting fawning profiles, kept getting platformed by Democrat politicians who knew exactly who they were.

And just in case you forgot what these ghouls actually believe, here's their own words from the Holy Land Foundation trial:

"…eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions."

That’s not "taken out of context." That's not ancient history. That's the mission statement, straight from the Muslim Brotherhood's internal documents, and CAIR was literally named in them as part of the network.

We told you. We begged you to listen. And instead of gratitude, we got canceled, deplatformed, and demonized by the same media that spent years pretending CAIR was just a "civil rights group."

Enjoy the country you refused to defend, suckers. Because they're not coming for it anymore. They're already inside the gates, and half of them are on your dime.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you.

Tweet

Anti-Israel/anti-Semitic violent protesters at Barnard College arrested

More protests broke out on Thursday at Barnard College, in New York City, after a group of more than 50 anti-Israel Jew-hating Islamists took over a building on campus the day before.

The NYPD made several arrests after the protests reignited, with about 100 anti-Israel protesters gathering in front of the entrance to Barnard, once again wearing masks and keffiyehs and chanting, "Free Palestine," a place that only exists in their minds.

Tension rose and became more chaotic as protesters marched from Barnard to CUNY's City College campus, to protest outside Gov. Kathy Hochul's event at CUNY, which was canceled due to the anticipated protest and her fear of getting involved.

The protesters were heard chanting criticisms of Hochul and "NYPD KKK," and tried to breach police barricades and get close to officers' faces. The irony is that the Jew-hating protesters are indistinguishable from the KKK when it comes to their racist hatred.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), spoke out against the protests.

"ENOUGH IS ENOUGH," Johnson wrote in a post on X.

"Pro-Hamas mobs have NO place on our college campuses. Barnard College & Columbia University must put an end to the anti-Semitic chaos on campus."

Robin Levine, Barnard’s vice president for strategic communications, confirmed that a faculty member was injured during Wednesday's protest and sent to the hospital, but did not offer further details, in spite of her being Jewish but not wanting to get labeled Islamophobic.

"They encouraged others to enter campus without identification, showing blatant disregard for the safety of our community," Levine said in a previous statement.

The school warned that if the students were not gone by 9:30 p.m., officials would be forced to take "additional, necessary measures to protect our campus." 

Power hoses might suffice.

The protesters began leaving the building by 11 p.m., according to reports by FOX 5 New York as it was for many, their bedtime.

The students were protesting the expulsion of two students who stormed a Columbia University classroom in January and allegedly threw around flyers filled with hateful, anti-Semitic speech.

Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, a place they cannot show us on a map, displayed videos on X of masked students in a hallway on Wednesday, beating on drums and chanting on megaphones.

The account also posted a list of demands accompanied by "WE WILL NOT STOP UNTIL OUR DEMANDS ARE MET. FREE PALESTINE."

If they get arrested, they will stop.

The demands include an "immediate reversal of the two Barnard students’ expulsions" and "amnesty for all students disciplined for pro-Palestine action or thought. Drop all the charges now!" 

Sorry, children, but people who commit crimes must be held accountable, as I hope you soon find out in a more personal way.

The protesters also requested a public meeting with Dean Leslie Grinage and President Laura Rosenbury, and the abolition of the "corrupt Barnard disciplinary process," demanding complete transparency for current, past and future disciplinary proceedings.

The students vowed that they will continue to disrupt the campus until these demands are met, so they obviously need to be held accountable.

We shall see, but don't hold your breath.

If you would like to support my work, you can Buy Me A Coffee or subscribe. Thanks.



Tweet

German Interior Minister doesn't know Jack Schlift about Islam

Nancy Faeser: useful idiot

The jihadi who ran his car into a crowd of Christmas shoppers in Magdeburg, Germany on Friday and later shouted "Allahu akbar!" upon his capture, is not Islamophobic. In fact, one can easily see that he is Islamophilic based not only on what he did, but on what his background shows.

Taleb al-Abdulmohsen, 50, migrated from Saudi Arabia to Germany in 2006 and cosplayed being an ex-Muslim; he even connected with known critics of Islam and this led media outlets to present him as an "anti-Islam" terrorist.

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser, who for years has refused to connect Islam with terrorism and went so far as to criticize critics of Islam and mass Muslim migration to Germany, calling them "Nazis," claimed that “we can only say with certainty that the perpetrator was obviously Islamophobic.”

Trying to kill as many Christmas shoppers right before the holiday is Islamophobic? How does that even make sense? It's a freaking non sequitur. After all, how many Muslims was this jihadi hoping to kill at a Christmas shopping market? Why would Abdulmohsen choose such a place?

Why did Abdulmohsen lie about being an ex-Muslim [aka, an apostate] and present himself publicly as such?

Islam has doctrines that call for deception under certain circumstances. These doctrines are known as taqiyya which allows Muslims to lie for the sake of Islam. This is not just a 'one-off,' it's part of the  foundational precepts in Islamic theology across all sects and schools of jurisprudence. 

Also, jihad groups have been calling for attacks in Germany and this attack was a perfect example of one such attack. There have been recent incidents where Muslims have marched in the streets of Germany shouting "Allahu akbar!" Using vehicles to cause death, injury and destruction has been recommended by these jihadis.

So let's be clear: Nancy Faeser is either a useful idiot or a deceptive enemy of the German people. She is either looking at the cancerous spread of Islam across Germany as a mere boo-boo, or knows what will happen if you let it grow.

The Telegraph reported that Abdulmohsen wrote: "I have to admit that I was deceived by western Leftists. I thought they welcome refugees because they care for human rights. But my experience in Germany showed me that they welcome refugees because they want to Islamise Europe." There's one thing that Faeser hates: warnings about the Islamization of Europe. The German political elites are deeply worried about the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which opposes mass Muslim migration. When incessantly calling the AfD a bunch of Nazis failed, they have even considered ways to outlaw it.

Does anyone with a functioning Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex really believe that the spread of Islam via mass migration poses no threat to Western society and our values?

For Faeser and her leftist allies, the race is on. Earlier, those who supported mass migration into Europe without worrying about Islamization used mass murderer Anders Breivik's so-called "manifesto" to discredit critics of Islam that he supposedly named. Now, Faeser and other useful idiots believe they've found this decade's Breivik in Taleb Abdulmohsen.

Nancy Faeser is a danger to herself and others.

Tweet

Hate Crime Hoax of Palestinians as Victims

When three Palestinian-American college students were shot on November 25, of last year, the incident was painted as an "anti-Palestinian hate crime. Birdcage liner New York Times and other major news outlets had the public believing that lie, but as it turned out the shooter was pro-Hamas, making him a bloody Hamasshole and the leftist media anti-American information purveyors.

Whenever the meteoric rise in anti-Semitism was pointed out, Palestinian-Hamas advocates point to this Vermont shooting as proof that Arabs and Muslims are just as much victims as those, you know, Jews.

But it wasn't true.

It got to the point where some schools said they would form a committee to investigate anti-Semitism, and also investigate Islamophobia. Harvard naturally jumped on the bandwagon along with other prestigious universities. Even the Biden administration, announced its U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism immediately followed up with an announcement that it's also preparing a national strategy to counter Islamophobia, because you see how often bands of marauders go out into the night and attack Muslims.

But it turns out that Exhibit A of “anti-Palestinian hate” was just smoke and mirrors.

By December, local Vermont media reported that the alleged shooter's social media accounts showed pro-Hamas rhetoric.

Of course, the mainstream media ignored this news until now. In the March 3 edition of the New York Times Magazine, an essay by Rozina Ali, formerly a Cairo-based journalist who is writing a book about "the recent history of Islamophobia in the United States," ad is also an adjunct teacher at New York University, wrote about why we should be sympathetic for the three 20-year-old male victims. 

Buried in the 41 paragraph article, in paragraph 30, Ali took a sudden change in direction. “Hate crimes are challenging to prove in court,” she wrote. "What made this case even more tricky was that the alleged shooter, Jason Eaton, said nothing out loud before, during or after the shooting.” There were no shouts of "death to Muslims," or "this is MAGA country," for example. 

So it is obviously difficult to know whether this was a hate crime due to lack of evidence, even with the attacker's social media accounts. 

But in this case, according to author Rozina Ali, it was the exact opposite.

With regard to the Oct. 7 pogrom perpetrated by Hamas in southern Israel that killed 1,200 men, women and children, here’s what the “anti-Palestinian” Eaton wrote on X on Nov. 16: “What if someone occupied your country? Wouldn’t you fight them?” [Hint: Easton might have been defending Hamas' October 7, massacre of Israelis.]

Ali only quoted on of Eaton's posts but on Oct, 17, a post that was quoted by by Seven Days, a Vermont-based news agency, on Dec. 6:  “The notion that Hamas is ‘evil’ for defending their state from occupation is absurd. They are owed a state. Pay up.”

So Eaton clearly is defending what Hamas did on that Sabbath day in October, destroying the left's narrative that the shooting was Islamophobia. This explains why he wasn't charged with a hate crime since his social media shows he supports, not hates Palestinians.

Ali and others have reported that Eaton has a long history of personal problems. That would seem to be what was behind this crazy shooting, but that doesn't fit the narrative that Hamasshole advocates push forward. However, the truth was only exposed at first by the Vermont press so the left kept pushing the "anti-Palestine hate" because they believed nobody would know the true story. 

But now the word is out and even the New York Times had to admit that Eaton is a cretin.

Anti-Semitism is at an all-time high just a day after the October 7th blood bath of Israelis, once the public got over the initial horrors of Israeli children and adults being burned alive, mutilated, raped, beheaded and otherwise murdered. 

By October 8, it was okay for closet anti-Semites to once again show their true colors when it came to, you know, the Jews. Somehow the world forgot what Hamas and other terrorist groups had done that day, and blamed the victims of their deranged massacre in order to justify their own hatred of one of the most successful and productive groups of individuals in the Middle East.

And when Israel began to successfully beat back Hamas and take control in the war, the West hated Israel for that. It's only when Jews are being mercilessly slaughtered that the West feels brief sympathy for the Jews.

Now Palestinians are using that fact to try pumping the public for sympathy. They show dead babies [sometimes the babies are fake and made of rubber] but they forget to say that the babies and others were used by Hamas as human shields for propaganda purposes and for some protection because they know Israel will not fire at them when they hide behind children and innocent adults when they see it happening.

Hamas is responsible for every single dead Palestinian. Every last one. And the West refuses to open their eyes.

Last November, an Ohio Muslim named Hesham Ayyad tried to perpetrate a jihadi hoax. He claimed a driver yelled “Kill all Palestinians!” and “Long live Israel!” at him and then ran him over. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and similar groups yelled “Hate crime!” It would have made Jussie Smollett proud, but security footage showed Ayyad and his brother in a street corner fistfight, which caused his injuries. 

Surprisingly, Ayyad has been charged with lying about the incident, but CAIR still won’t admit that it was a hoax because CAIR is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. And there's no doubt they will fail to acknowledge the Vermont shooting as a media hoax.

Jason Eaton is pro-Hamas and his posts show it beyond a doubt. Reasonable people should be able to see the truth while extremists always believe feelings over facts and reality. Eaton's shooting of those men had nothing to do with anti-Muslim sentiments. 

He is just another damn criminal much like those in the media who commit fraud when they refuse to write the truth when they know it. Sadly, they do this with impunity.

Tweet

Canada school district cancels speech by iSIS rape victim and Nobel prize winner due to fear of being killed

A woman who had been kidnapped and became a sexual slave at the hands of the Islamic State [ISIS] was scheduled to speak of her ordeal at a Canadian school district but the educators were too frightened that her revealing what happened to her, might cause them to be in danger. The excuse they gave was that they worried about "Islamophobia," or an irrational fear of the religion of Islam, which when taken literally, calls for death to Jews, gays, Gypsies, atheists, people who leave Islam, people who call out Muhammad for being a pedophile, and so on.

What is irrational about that?

After seeing how fearful American educators have been over the COVID situation, it should come as no surprise to see the same level of fear coming from Canadian educators when it comes to speaking an uncomfortable truth.

Of course, not all Muslims are terrorists, and not all terrorists are Muslims. But let's not pretend there isn't a problem with Islamic terrorism. Islamophobia is a term invented by Islamists to shut us up, just like the term "racist" is used for the same reason.

Nadia Murad, 28, was scheduled to visit with students from 600 different Canadian schools to speak about her upcoming book, "The Last Girl: My Story Of Captivity," which documents the horrific treatment she suffered from ISIS. But she was told by the highly nervous "educators" of the Toronto School District that she could not speak at the event because it might make terrorists even madder than they typically seem to be at non terrorists of the world. They claimed her speaking to students could "foster Islamophobia," or an irrational fear of terrorists. Hmm.

The cowardly decision to prevent students from being educated about terrorism was made by Helen Fisher the Toronto School Board Superintendent. She said the book could be viewed as offensive to Muslims. 

Abu Umar al-Shishani standing next to a group of fighters

Which Muslims would be offended? The Muslims girls who had been forced into childhood marriages they had no choice but to accept? Muslim boys who don't accept antiquated ways of sharia law--laws that prescribe cutting off the hands of thieves; or throwing gays from high places to their death; or hating Jews and Christians for being born into those religions; and a law that calls for the death of those who would leave the religion of Islam?

Fisher doesn't explain.

Ms. Murad's book details how she escaped the Islamic State after being kidnapped from her home and sold into sex slavery and was raped, beaten and tortured at age 14. 

Nadia Murad won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018 and founded Nadia's Initiative, through which she is a leading advocate for survivors of sexual exploitation and genocide. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

What descent Muslim would take offense to her for telling her story? What descent Muslim would defend what happened to her in an attempt to defend Islam? 

What intelligent Muslim would think that the book is an attack on Islam as a religion rather than Islam practiced this way as a geopolitical movement?

At least one district parent, identifying herself as Tanya Lee,  criticized the cowardly school district for the fear of allowing this brave young woman to speak.

"This is what the Islamic State means. It is a terrorist organization. It has nothing to do with ordinary Muslims. The Toronto school board should be aware of the difference," Lee said.

Murad won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018 and founded Nadia's Initiative, through which she is a leading advocate for survivors of sexual exploitation and genocide. 

Helen Fisher has never won the Nobel Peace Prize nor any prizes for bravery.

Tweet

Virginia Ed Dept. tells teachers to avoid teaching about the Islamic extremism of 9/11

The Virginia Department of Education has become an oxymoron because it refuses to educate students on a particular topic that is relevant to understanding the motivation behind the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The department hosted a speaker who instructed teachers to avoid talking about the role Islamic extremism played in the suicide attacks that took the lives of nearly 3,000 individuals. 

The person who delivered the PowerPoint presentation by "Education Leadership scholar" Amaarah DeCuir, instructed to teachers to avoid using language that could [accurately] blame the events of 9/11 on Muslim extremists, people willing to die for Islam in order to forward this geopolitical religion. DeCuir pointed to the heightened anti-Muslim sentiment that allegedly increases around the anniversary of the Islamic terrorist attacks.

“School and classroom 9/11 commemorations are sites for increased anti-Muslim racism,” her presentation reads. “This year’s 20th anniversary commemorations will likely result in heightened risks of racist discourse, threats, and violence targeting Muslim students in schools and society. Educators are well-positioned to disrupt these risks by centering the socio-emotional needs of Muslims in their commemoration plans.”

DeCuir created a list of teaching standards that are “in” and “out,” according to her radical, anti-American viewpoints. 

Teaching standards that are “in” include “acknowledgment of anti-Muslim racism.” Teaching standards that are “out” include the “false assumption of Muslim responsibility for 9/11” and “American exceptionalism.” 

Of course, the truth is extremism and hatred for the West was and is the catalyst for terrorism, but DeCuir, with her twisted logic, would have us believe that the Muslims responsible for the attack were the victims of the event and the dead Americans were somehow responsible for their own fates. This is reminiscent of critical race theory which is both anti-American and racist.

The presentation gave examples of “harmful teaching” about 9/11. She gave examples that included “creating a tense classroom environment,” “reducing 9/11 instruction to death counts and fear mongering,” “assumptions of emotional distance,” “teaching about Islam and/or Muslims,” “amplifying the extremists and extremist acts of 9/11,” “demanding the condemnation of 9/11,” “failing to respond to anti-Muslim racism,” and “reproducing a single, American narrative that marginalizes other students.”

What happened twenty years ago this Saturday was tense and while the death counts in the three terrorist scenes was almost 3,000, it was only a fraction of what is known about that day. People trapped above the floors where the two planes hit had no chance of escape and many died jumping from the upper floors to escape the horrific heat--some held hands as they jumped together.

While it's said repeatedly, most Muslims are not terrorists, but all of the terrorists on 9/11 were Muslims, and all were performing Islamic jihad and were willing to die in order to practice this part of the religion of Islam. How can we not amplify the extremist acts of 9/11 when this ideology is still being practiced today, as it has been since Mohammad married a 6-year-old girl named Aisha?

And anti-Muslim "racism" isn't a thing because Islam isn't a race. But putting that aside, the larger problem isn't "islamophobia" [a term originally capitalized on by Muslim think tanks in order to shut the mouths of those people opposing the geopolitical side of Islam and its global jihad] the larger problem in the United States is anti-Semitism. In fact, it's on top of the hate crime list.

Even Democrats refuse to address the anti-Zionist/anti-Semitic rhetoric on Capitol Hill by such congresspeople as Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Cori Bush (D-MO), and Ayanna Pressley (D-OH). 

Below is the FBI's 2019 listing of religious hate crimes in the United States:

60.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.
13.2 percent were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias.
3.8 percent were victims of anti-Catholic bias.
3.8 percent were victims of anti-Other Christian bias.
3.5 percent were victims of anti-Sikh bias.
2.9 percent were victims of anti-Eastern Orthodox (Russian, Greek, Other) bias.
2.6 percent were victims of bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group).
1.4 percent were victims of anti-Protestant bias.
0.9 percent (15 individuals) were victims of anti-Mormon bias.
0.4 percent (7 individuals) were victims of anti-Jehovah’s Witness bias.
0.4 percent (7 individuals) were victims of anti-Hindu bias.
0.3 percent (6 individuals) were victims of anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.
0.3 percent (5 individuals) were victims of anti-Buddhist bias.
6.3 percent were victims of bias against other religions (anti-other religion).

So while DeCuir tries to depict Muslims as the largest victim group of hate crimes, the numbers don't lie.

According to her biography from American University, DeCuir is an education scholar who “focuses on the intersections of leadership, gender, and diverse cultural contexts to advance social justice.” In a tweet about the event, she called on “antiracist” educators to join and “disrupt” the current education of 9/11.

The term 'antiracist' means 'racist.' The term 'disrupt' the current education of 9/11, means to 'withhold information in order to foster a false narrative. This again is perfectly aligned with critical race theory and is a danger to the country as it is designed to undermine our basic principles and freedoms.

DeCuir had previously thanked the Michigan-based Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU), a Muslim interest group endorsed by Rashida Tlaib, an anti-Semite and a Hamas supporter. DeCuir once tweeted:

“My work would not be possible without the amazing research from [ISPU]! Thank you for your support,”

Tlaib also endorses the organization for its "profound" work.

Virginia State Senator Steve Newman (R) condemned the bullcrap presentation and called on educators state-wide to teach “the facts.” What a concept. 

“I lived through 9/11… This one event was due to Muslim extremists and their actions, the desire of these individuals to kill as many Americans as possible at one time. Why do we need to change history, again? Just tell the facts,” Newman said. “We have a responsibility to our children today to ensure they know the awful truth about the events of that day, and the evil intent behind the terrorists … We must teach the next generation the truth about our history.”

And lest we forget, it was Ilhan Omar who once dubbed the terrorism of 9/11 as “some people [that] did something.”

Hopefully your September 11, 2021 will be a day of reflection and a peaceful day overall. 

I still remember the burnt office papers that ended up on my Brooklyn roof on that sunny Tuesday twenty years ago. And I learned a lot about the so-called 'religion of peace' afterward.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Ilhan Omar's marriage: season two

Far-left progressive-progressive and anti-Semite extraordinaire, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) allegedly married her brother for immigration purposes, married another guy before getting a divorce from her brother, and is engaged in an affair with a married man who worked with her campaign while she was married as well.

Now there are new details from a British publication claiming that the Trump-hating trollop is paying off her ex-husband to keep his mouth shut about her alleged affair.

According to The Daily Mail, Ahmed Hirsi, Omar's husband,  “discovered the truth about her torrid affair with her chief fundraiser [Tim Mynett] when he went to her Washington D.C. apartment last spring and found the lovers lounging around in pajamas.”

Multiple sources said that Hirsi left “angry and humiliated” after learning about the affair.

“He suspected she was cheating but she kept telling him he was paranoid,” a source told The Daily Mail. “He told her he wanted to move down to D.C. to be with her but she insisted he should stay in Minneapolis with the children. Eventually he surprised her down there and his worst fears were confirmed.”

Sources told The Daily Mail that Omar allegedly agreed to a financial settlement with Hirsi that would pay him tens of thousands of dollars per year, up to $250,000 total, “but only if he did not speak publicly about the marriage breakdown.”

Sources in the Minnesota Somali community in Omar’s district say that she has “embarrassed” them and that they have lost faith in her due to her alleged infidelity, her decision to hold an event at a distillery [alcohol is forbidden in Islam except in Jannah, or Paradise where the rivers flow with wine], and her stance on LGBTQ rights [homosexuality and lesbianism is strictly forbidden in Islam and is punishable by death].

“It’s almost as if she is deliberately trying to turn her Somali supporters against her,” a source told the outlet. “She is as a figurehead for us, the most famous Somali in America and she had embarrassed us. She is the face of the Somali community.”

Omar has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars of campaign donations to Mynett, according to Federal Election Committee (FEC) records, and this has gone unpunished or even seriously examined due to fears by officials of Islamophobia.

The anti-Semitic congresswoman's new committee filings submitted Friday morning show that between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31, 2019, her committee made $215,000 in additional payments to the E Street Group, a firm run by political consultant Tim Mynett, Omar’s alleged boyfriend. The payments were reported as going toward consulting, direct mail, research services, travel expenses, advertisements, and graphic design. In other words, for services rendered. 

The committee reported hauling in $403,000 in individual contributions while disbursing $404,000 over the last three months of 2019. The $215,000 paid to Omar's alleged paramour's group for its services accounts for 53 percent of the total disbursements from the campaign during this time.

Over the first three quarters of 2019, Omar’s campaign paid out a total of $310,000 to Mynett's E Street Group. Accounting for the fourth-quarter payments, his firm raked in a total of $525,000 from Omar’s campaign in 2019.

The latest developments to emerge from her alleged marital affair are separate from the allegations that she allegedly married her brother, proving, if true, that she is a low-life.

The FBI is currently examining evidence it has obtained pertaining to the alleged marriage,  according to The New York Post.

The newspaper also reported that the FBI was planning on sharing its findings with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials and the U.S. Department of Education.

Will Ilhan Omar get convicted of immigration fraud, and/or campaign finance fraud?

Of course not. What, are you Islamophobic or something?


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Court kicks CAIR out of San Diego school district

Nihad Awad, a jihadi

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” Muslim Brotherhood motto.

Finally, in a landmark case, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land terror-funding case that pretends to be a civil advocate organization, has been forced out of the San Diego Unified School District.

A lawsuit was brought against the district for partnering with CAIR and allowing the Islamist, Muslim Brotherhood affiliated organization to run a discriminatory, unconstitutional propaganda program in its schools. [Can I get an Allahu akbar!]

The court agreed with this assessment.

The program the Islamists used gave Muslim students special privileges and gave CAIR the power to change the district curriculum to make sure Islam was looked upon more favorably, in spite of its history.

Students and parents were made to watch biased videos, CAIR officials were allowed to teach students and teachers about Islam and students were trained “how to become allies with Muslims students.”

The program began in April 2017 and was based on false evidence that, in the wake of President Donald Trump’s electoral victory, Muslim students were subjected to “Islamophobic” bullying--examples were never given by CAIR and state records indicated there was absolutely no evidence of such bullying in the district’s schools.

The court ruled that the program was unconstitutional as it violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause by favoring one religious group over another and mixing government with religion.

Under the terms of the ruling, the school district is required to permanently drop the program and prevented from allowing CAIR to be involved in school activities in the future, stifling their future goal to destroy our "miserable house from within."

Further, school officials must correct the pro-Muslim student bias and disproportionate emphasis on Islamic history in its curriculum, which were both instituted through the program.

The court further gave the following guidelines to the schools:

“Educators should treat each religion with equal respect, with the time and attention spent discussing each religion being proportionate to its impact on history.”  

“Educational material on religious subjects must be neutral and may not be presented in a manner that promotes one religion over another.”  

“Educators or other staff sponsoring guest speakers at District events must ask them not to use their position or influence on students to forward their own religious, political, economic or social views and shall take active steps to neutralize whatever bias has been presented.”  

“Guest speakers from religious organizations are not permitted to present to students on religious topics.”

“This is a tremendous victory, because CAIR intended this plan to be a pilot program for a nationwide rollout,” said Daniel J. Piedra, executive director of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF), the organization which brought the suit against the school district.

The FCDF said that other school districts similarly affected by CAIR are Seattle Public Schools, Minneapolis Public Schools, Cajon Valley Unified School District and Gilroy Unified School District.

Who are the useful idiots allowing this infiltration and brainwashing into our children's schools?

“This settlement agreement will serve as a warning to politically correct school boards nationwide to think twice about partnering with CAIR,” said Charles LiMandri, chief counsel for FCDF.

LiMandri called the court’s decision a “victory against radical Islamic indoctrination in America’s schools.”

The FBI and the Justice Department have both banned CAIR as an outreach partnerbecause of its Islamist agenda and ties to Hamas and terror funding.


CAIR was listed by the U.S. government as being among “individuals/entities who are/were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee and/or its organizations.” The Palestine Committee was a secret body set up by the Brotherhood to advance the Brotherhood/Hamas agenda in America.

A secret meeting of the committee held in Philadelphia in 1993 was wiretapped by the FBI. Nihad Awad, co-founder and executive director of CAIR participated in that meeting where members agreed that a new “neutral” entity for influencing U.S. policy and opinion was agreed upon.

Awad founded CAIR the following year and the scumcrumpet is still allowed to be in a country that he hates and hopes to convert us or destroy those who refuse.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Anti-Semite Sistah Sarsour hurries to Ilhan Omar's defense

Rep[ulsive] Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has become the darling of anti-Semites across the political spectrum after her tweeting regarding AIRPAC's "influence" on members of the federal government. Such fine scumwafers such as David "KKK" Duke from the far-right, and co-leader of the Women's March, Linda "The Hamashole" Sarsour, have been vomiting praise on Omar, and who better to receive praise from racists and anti-Semites than this congresswoman?

Sarsour is well-known for her ties to flaming anti-Semite and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan,  and other anti-Semitic leaders. She has also made her personal anti-Semitic ideas public. 

Sarsour has regularly spoken out against the state of Israel, and, in twin exposés in both Tablet Magazine and the New York Times, she was accused of confronting Jewish Women's March leaders at the movement's foundational meetings -- and eventually helping to strong-arm those same Jewish women out of leadership positions so that she could take power along with three others who spout the same anti-Semitic garbage.

Sarsour forged a bond between the Women's March and Farrakhan, and reportedly arranged for the Nation of Islam to provide security for Women's March leaders and at Women's March events. Get in their way and they will break your head.

After Omar was again outed for her anti-Semitic rhetoric, Sarsour quickly penned an essay defending her. On Sunday night, Omar had tweeted out a blatantly anti-Semitic trope, accusing the pro-Israel group, AIPAC of bankrolling lawmakers on behalf of the state of Israel, which she has regularly attacked in the past.

"AIPAC is one of the most influential lobbies in American politics - alongside the NRA (maybe not anymore), fossil fuel industry and big pharmaceuticals," Sarsour wrote on Facebook, clearly oblivious to the fact that AIPAC has a lobbying budget of only $3.5 million per year, compared to $20M or $30M for fossil fuel companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

"AIPAC connects donors to campaigns and elected officials. Trying to argue that critiquing the role of AIPAC which let’s be clear is not a Jewish organization, many of its leaders and members are Christian Zionists - is antisemitic is ludicrous," the anti-Semitic Sarsour [who refused to capitalize "Semitic"] continued. "Critiques of the State of Israel ARE NOT antisemitic. Calling out AIPAC is not antisemitic...We have work to do to dismantle all forms of racism including antisemitism. We do that under the leadership of Jewish allies who have invested in education, relationship building not vilification and harassment."

" will not be silent in the face of attacks, harassment and targeted policing of speech from a Black Muslim woman elected official, our sister Ilhan Omar in the name of combatting antisemitism. We can stand up for Ilhan knowing her record and what she stands for and also combat antisemitism. I will not be distracted by the fact that dangerous antisemitism is being peddled by the very people claiming to care about Jews and antisemítism," she concluded.

Sarsour added that she believes Republican Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is, in fact, the most anti-Semitic Member of Congress -- not Omar -- for noting that George Soros is a top donor to the Democratic Party, though McCarthy has been clear that he is opposed to Soros's far-left positions on issues like immigration, not his religion.

Yeah, Jewish like George Soros, an atheist who's about as Jewish as Osama bin Laden.

Sarsour posted twice more. She encouraged her anti-Semitic followers to contact their Democratic representative in order to prevent Democratic leadership from issuing an official condemnation of Omar's rhetoric. 

According to Sarsour, opposition to Omar's Tweet is designed to "stifle free speech in favor of Palestinians and in opposition to Israeli policies," not crack down on anti-Semitism in Democratic ranks.

But say something about the ideology of Islamists terrorists and you're called 'Islamophobic.'

Sarsour's effort failed because by the middle of Monday afternoon, leadership, including Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), had issued statements chastising Omar for adopting and propagating anti-Semitic tropes.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

CAIR is suing Texas over what??

The Council on American-Islamic Relations is suing the great state of Texas. While there are probably a few anti-Semites living there, as far as CAIR is concerned, there aren't enough. They want the entire state to be anti-Semitic.

But Texas flipped them off with legislation to ensure that it isn't anti-Semitic.

So CAIR has shown its true nature--viz., the scorpion in the pond.

Yes, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is announcing a lawsuit against the state of Texas for passing anti-BDS legislation last year.

The boycott, divest and sanction movement (BDS) against Israel aims to strangle the Jewish state economically while at the same time calls for the flooding of Palestinians into Israel to destroy the Jewish character of the state. If you don't believe this, ask Linda Sarsour and the Women's March movement or others who support BDS.

According to the definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance and officially adopted by the U.S. (along with 31 other nations), the BDS movement has been deemed to be an anti-Semitic movement.

The main reason anti-Semitism can be attributed to the BDS movement is because it "[applies] double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of by any other democratic nation."

There are no less than 100 land disputes across the globe that are not subject to “BDS” movements because they are not the land of the Jews.

In their lawsuit against Texas, CAIR says Texas’ anti-BDS legislation infringes upon their First Amendment rights. This is a BS claim, a non sequitur when one applies this accusation to its logical conclusion.

First we must ask: How is legislation against anti-Semitism an infringement on their rights? What CAIR actually means is that the lawsuit infringes on their rights to be anti-Semitic, which many believe is required by sharia [Islamic law].

While it is every individual’s right in the United States to hold and express their opinions no matter how disgusting they are (as long they do not lead to immediate violence), this is a far cry from an organ of the government expressing such views or acting in an illegal way by doing so.

In addition, the U.S. Constitution spells out clearly that it is illegal to discriminate based on religion. Thus, the United States government has made its legal opinion known on the worldwide scourge of anti-Semitism.

CAIR labels itself as a “Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization” and pretends to speak for all Muslims. A 2011 Gallup poll found that more than 88 percent of Muslims felt that CAIR does not represented their interests). 

The truth is, CAIR speaks for Islamist supremacists – Muslims who believe that sharia law--which is not at all in alignment with the U.S. Constitution--should be enacted as a worldwide system of government.

In a press release announcing the Texas lawsuit, CAIR billed the BDS movement as a movement for Palestinian rights, [like the right to terrorize and kill Israelis] in spite of the Palestinians themselves who feel the movement only hurts them by destroying jobs they otherwise had with Israeli companies forced by the movement to relocate out of the disputed territories.

CAIR was designated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terror-funding trial in U.S. history. The trial found executives of the Holy Land Foundation guilty of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas in 2008. Despite a legal appeal launched by CAIR to have this status changed, the next year, a U.S. district court upheld CAIR’s designation as an unindicted co-conspirator because of “ample evidence” linking it to Hamas.

Never forget that fact.

Another fact: in November 2014, CAIR was designated as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked entities.

Islamist anti-Semitism is as old as Islam itself. CAIR, along with other Islamists, have worked overtime to create a new strategy to introduce this long-standing bigotry into mainstream discourse, and in many U.S. universities and leftist culture, it's working.

They have done this through creating the “Islamophobia” narrative, which serves two purposes: First, it asserts that Muslims are victims of racism, in spite of the fact that Islam is not a race. But lately, the definition of racism has expanded, so take it for what it's worth.

Second, one of the worst things to be called in the West is a racist. Nobody wants to bear that title. And this is what the Islamophobia narrative tries to do.  By doing so, it immediately shuts off all criticism of Islamic ideology and the dialog is over.

Now that Islamists made Muslims out to be a privileged group because of their intersectional status as victims, they made alliances with other victim-status groups, such as the Women's March in the U.S. and the Yellow Vests in France.

Once Islamists established that that Muslims were a privileged group (because of their victimhood status), they went about making alliances with other victim-status groups, where anti-Semitism has become the rallying cry for grassroots political movements. Now the Yellow Vests and Women's March movements can  blame the country’s ills on the Jews, and it's easy to bring out this ancient canard as a rallying point.

CAIR’s latest tactic against the state of Texas should be exposed for what it really is: blatant anti-Semitism. 

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Muslim prof allowed to resign after accused of spanking female students

A Drake University associate professor, Mahmoud Hamad, is accused of making a female student sit on his lap and threatening to spank her. Rather than terminating his employment at the Iowa school, Drake is allowing him to resign, after a report concluded he sexually "intimidated female students" [plural].

Hamad was placed on a leave of absence and "has no teaching or academic responsibilities" at the school, Sue Mattison, the provost told the Des Moines Register on Thursday.

Hamad's resignation is effective June 1st. He hasn't taught since 2016 and went on a sabbatical last year--it's a good racket.

The internal investigation by Drake found Hamad "physically, sexually and verbally intimidated female students and did exploit the power differential that existed between him and his female students."

Perhaps now that he's no longer working for the school, he can get a job at NBC.

Due to the existence of political correctness and the fact that Hamad is a Muslim and the school doesn't want to be labeled 'Islamophobic,' the university did not refer the case to the Des Moines Police Department.

The first student to speak out about the randy assistant professor was graduate student Nickey Jafari, age 24. She posted on social media last year that she met Hamad, who became her adviser, in the summer of 2011 during a student trip to Egypt. Hamad was the group's leader and instructor.

She said Hamad "asked her to sit on his lap" and she did so twice. She also stated that Hamad "put his arms around her and his face was close to her neck." The kinky prof then asked Jafari to refer to him as "Dad."

Jafari said he promised her a free trip to Egypt if she had a perfect grade-point average and also claimeld Hamad threatened to "spank" her if she did not receive all A's.

According to Jafari, she decided to report Hamad because she feared he would go to another school and do the same thing with other young women students. She added that Olympic gold medal-winner Aly Raisman inspired her to come forward. [Raisman was one of the sexual assault victims of disgraced gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar.

Investigators found the claims against Hamad "credible" and found he "violated university policies through unwelcome advances and unwelcome verbal and physical conduct and intimidation aimed at female students because of their sex."

Jared Bernstein, the director of Drake's public relations, told Fox News: "Drake University is committed to the safety and well-being of all students, and especially those who have the courage to come forward with a complaint."

Evidently they are not committed to the safety and well-being quite as much, for those students too frightened to come forward, nor are they committed to terminating the employment of scum wafers who violate the school's commitment, particularly if it isn't politically correct to do so.

Tweet

New Islamophobic phrase: 'God bless you'

Simmons College in Bostonisthan says that if you say "God bless you" in their library, especially if it happens near their holy Koran, the librarians will consider it an Islamophobic micro-aggression, a made up term that has no bearing on reality.

But why should reality matter? After all, if you were born a man and believe you're a woman, poof, you're a woman. And if anyone disagrees, they can be taken to court for a hate crime. It doesn't matter that biologically, you're a dude--your body produces sperm cells, you have Y chromosomes, but in the eyes of idiotic progressives [a word that is anything but progressive because that requires actual progress] you are what and who you say you are. 

Saying "God bless you" is considered a form of "Islamomisia," or a strong hatred of Islam.

Seriously though, what's not to like about Islam?

The alleged "school" has an Anti-Oppression Library Guide containing myriad words and phrases that are considered micro-aggressions and have the potential of making some of the kids cry.

Worse than Islamophobia is Islamomisia. "In North America (and throughout much of the western world), people who follow Christianity have institutionalized power, therefore Islamomisia is a systemized discrimination or antagonism directed against Muslim people due to their religion or perceived religious, national or ethnic identity associated with Islam," the Guide says.

The librarians, particularly the gay ones who fear for their lives, warn that phrases like "God Bless you," and "Merry Christmas" and "Happy Easter" can tick off intolerant  Muslims. 

However, there is nothing in the Guide saying that Muslims who use the phrase "Inshallah," [if Allah is willing], hundreds of times a day, are being Christianomisia.

In fact this disgusting Guide warned students to be wary of "Christian privilege," perhaps referring to the Christians buried in Arlington National Cemetery.

"In the United States and many other Western nations, Christianity and its various denominations and religious practices hold institutional and cultural power. Christian privilege is the unearned benefit that Christians in the US receive that members of other faiths (or non-religious people) do not.

This isn't exactly the case in parts of the world where Islam conquered and ruled. They forced Christians to convert, ordered them to leave or be killed--and those that stayed, were killed. Christian churches were/are often burned down but even when they were left standing, in Islamic countries, Christian churches are not allowed to be renovated or receive any repair.

But being permitted to worship freely, as is the case in our Judeo-Christian country, is considered Christian privilege by leftist dhimmies.

And let's never forget the Jews.

A group of 8 Montreal dwellers attended a city meeting wearing yellow badges [curiously resembling the Star of David that Jews in Nazi Germany were forced to wear to distinguish them from non-Jews] in protest of Jewish school buses. The anti-Semites, led by Ginette Chartre, says they will not back down.

The growing Hasidic community in Montreal's Outremont borough, is the cause of the protest as they use school buses to drop off their children around the city. The anti-Semites say it causes tension and some say the constant bus traffic causes congestion, noise and pollution. 

This very well may be the case, but it doesn't call for anti-Semitic overtures to make their point. In fact, it shows their stupidity and small minds, much like the librarians at Simmons College.

Anti-Semitic hate crimes far exceed all other religious-based crimes but Simmons College doesn't even mention them, and there are a significant number of Jews living in Boston and surrounding suburbs. 


Tweet

Muslima lied about being attacked by Trump supporters, pleads guilty

Yasmin Seweid (pronounced "Yes Man, Seaweed") is a 19-year-old Muslim, a college student and liar who attends Baruch College, in Manhattan.

On Friday, Yasmin pleaded guilty to falsely reporting an incident and disorderly conduct. She lied to the police, telling them she had been harassed on the New York City subway by white men.

Seweid claimed the incident took place on the Number 6 train on December 1, 2016. She told The New York Daily News that three drunk men screamed "Donald Trump!" and made anti-Islam slurs at her and even tried to rip off her hijab from her head.

"I heard them say something very loudly, something about Donald Trump . . . I also heard them say the word 'terrorist' and I sort of got a little scared," she said. She then added that they said, "Oh look, a (expletive) terrorist . . . Get the hell out of the country! You don't belong here!"

Then when she tried to ignore them, they pulled on her bag to get her attention and the strap broke. 'That's when I turned around and said 'can you please leave me alone', and they started laughing."

She then alleged that she walked to the other end of the platform and they followed her and tried to pull off her hijab, (a Muslim headscarf that keeps Muslim men from raping women). She claimed they yelled, "Take that thing off!"

She then lied more and said, "I put my hand on top of my head to hold it. Then I turned around and screamed 'what the (expletive, but you can guess--it starts with an 'f').'"

Seweid then took a swipe at then- President-elect Trump. "The president-elect just promotes this stuff and is very anti-Muslim, very Islamophobic, and he's just condoning it." She offered no evidence for her claims.

Seweid's father, when told of the fake incident, said, "Nobody even offered to help an 18-year-old girl. That means something [for instance, it means in a liberal town like New York City, liberals did not come to her aid]. Her phone was dying. You offer help--it doesn't matter the race, religion, or the country."

Too bad Muslims don't feel that way themselves. All of their alms, all of their charity, only goes to Muslims and terrorist organizations.

A few days after the publicity, Seweid went missing, which prompted a search for her.

She was arrested on December 14th on charges of filing a false report and obstructing governmental administration. Police sources said she lied because she didn't want to get in trouble for breaking her curfew after being out late drinking with friends, [because it's un-Islamic and could get a young girl honor-killed by the same father who was angry that nobody came to her aid].

The young Muslima wrote an apology that was read in court by the prosecutor: "I was stupid. I plan to continue to find ways to better myself." She had already admitted she wasted police resources when she lied.

Seiweid is ordered to take only six months of counseling and complete three long, hot, and hard days of community service [probably removing bubble gum from park benches].

I wonder if she felt she was right in blaming Trump for the actions of her imaginary Islamophobes.


Tweet

Canada: Fake 'Islamophobia' charge dropped

Whitby -- When a Muslim falsifies a hate crime and it is discovered, the charges against the victim of the accused are dropped, as they should be. But what happens to the accuser (aka liar) in those cases?

Zilch.

There is no punishment, no downside and they are held as poor martyrs and raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in fraudulent kickstarter campaigns.

Meanwhile, innocent and decent infidels are smeared in the process.

The post reads: "Charges dropped in Whitby hate incident, police say Muslim man exaggerated interaction," by Reka Szekely, DurhamRegion.com, August 26, 2017.

Assault charges were levied agains a 57-year-old infidel from Whitby in what police originally said was a hate incident. The charges have since been dropped and Durham police believe the complainant's story was "embellished" and the Crown has dropped the assault charges.

"We're not getting into too much of the details, the story--after doing further investigation--revealed inconsistencies and also he admits to exaggerating the story," said Constable George Tudos.

A 22-year-old Muslim man said that he was approached in the washroom on August 12th and was punched in the face by the accused. The 57-year-old man was arrested on August 18th.

Const. Tudos did not provide the media with specifics regarding which aspects of the Muslim man's story was a lie, but said the police will not be charging the 22-year-old man and also gave no specifics as to why no charges would be filed over the false police report.

The 22-year-old left the police station and all he could say to himself under his breath was "Allahu Akbar."



Tweet

US imam asks Allah to "annihilate" Jews

Imam Ammar Shahin gave a sermon at the Islamic Center of Davis, California on Friday and asked Allah to liberate the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Israel from "the filth of the Jews." His anti-Semitic words, which would be called hate speech if it were against Islam instead of the Jews, were translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute and cited an Islamic text calling for a Judgment Day fight between Muslims and Jews.

Specifically the scripture says: "Oh Allah, count them one by one and annihilate them down to the very last one. Do not spare any of them," which Shahin quoted, speaking in Arabic and English during his hateful sermon. "Oh Allah, make this happen by our hands. Let us play a part in this. Oh Allah, let us support them in words and in deeds."

Jewish groups have rightfully asked Homeland Security and the U.S. Attorney's office to investigate this imam who asks his congregation to take part in the slaughter.

A video of the sermon was posted on the Islamic Center of Davis' YouTube channel on Friday. Excerpts were translated and posted on the MEMRI website.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque is on a holy site for Jews and Muslims in East Jerusalem. On July 14, 2017 three Arab terrorists killed two Israeli police officers. The shrine was closed for a few days in the aftermath of the Islamic attack and new security measures using metal detectors were put into place to prevent more attacks.

So of course the Palestinians protested the metal detectors claiming that Israel was trying to expand its control over the holy site. And the way Palestinians protested the metal detectors was to prove how much they are needed: some of the worst street clashes in years broke out.

In a statement on its website, the Islamic Center of Davis stood behind Shahin and his words, saying it was taken out of context.

In other words, they are saying that if you look at the entire context of Shahin's sermon, you will see that when he called for the annihilation of all the Jews, he didn't really mean Jews, or he didn't actually mean annihilation. Just look at his sermon, analyze his words, and see for yourself what the context was. 

Nowhere does the scumquat's words explain anything other than his call for killing Jews. Nowhere. That's what full context is--the entire sermon.

To cover their butts, the ICD came out with a statement known as 'taqiyya': "The ICD will always stand against anti-Semitism similarly to how the Jewish community has always stood against Islamophobia in our close knit community," the balderdash statement said. "We have zero tolerance for anti-Semitism or any other form of bigotry."

No, they haven't. If they had zero tolerance they would have admonished the a-hole immediately. But they couldn't because all he was doing was using Islamic scripture, which happens to be anti-Semitic because Mohammed was anti-Semitic.

The taqiyya continued: "MEMRI, an extremist agenda driven organization that supports Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, and other Islamophobic news organizations, accused Imam Shahin of anti-Semitism, quoting edited, mistranslated, passages of the sermon out of context."

Except they didn't.

And there is no such thing as 'Islamophobia'. It's a word used to shut us up, to make us feel like racists over something that has nothing to do with race, but with an angry ideology.

A phobia is an irrational fear. Being afraid of Islamic terrorism isn't irrational--it's reality. And being born a Jew in today's society must be quite difficult even in American culture where anti-Semitism has become cocktail conversation.

Free speech includes what leftists call 'hate speech'. The First Amendment protects that and it should. But this imam is going beyond what the left calls hate speech--he is calling for violence and that needs to be dealt with.

ICD had to go through verbal calisthenics to try explaining away Shahin's words, but the meaning is crystal clear and calls for violence.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, an international Jewish human rights organization in Los Angeles, has called upon the DHS to investigate the imam for "inciting to murder Jews."

Probably nothing will be done.

Tweet