Tuesday, December 18, 2018

CAIR is suing Texas over what??

The Council on American-Islamic Relations is suing the great state of Texas. While there are probably a few anti-Semites living there, as far as CAIR is concerned, there aren't enough. They want the entire state to be anti-Semitic.

But Texas flipped them off with legislation to ensure that it isn't anti-Semitic.

So CAIR has shown its true nature--viz., the scorpion in the pond.

Yes, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is announcing a lawsuit against the state of Texas for passing anti-BDS legislation last year.

The boycott, divest and sanction movement (BDS) against Israel aims to strangle the Jewish state economically while at the same time calls for the flooding of Palestinians into Israel to destroy the Jewish character of the state. If you don't believe this, ask Linda Sarsour and the Women's March movement or others who support BDS.

According to the definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance and officially adopted by the U.S. (along with 31 other nations), the BDS movement has been deemed to be an anti-Semitic movement.

The main reason anti-Semitism can be attributed to the BDS movement is because it "[applies] double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of by any other democratic nation."

There are no less than 100 land disputes across the globe that are not subject to “BDS” movements because they are not the land of the Jews.

In their lawsuit against Texas, CAIR says Texas’ anti-BDS legislation infringes upon their First Amendment rights. This is a BS claim, a non sequitur when one applies this accusation to its logical conclusion.

First we must ask: How is legislation against anti-Semitism an infringement on their rights? What CAIR actually means is that the lawsuit infringes on their rights to be anti-Semitic, which many believe is required by sharia [Islamic law].

While it is every individual’s right in the United States to hold and express their opinions no matter how disgusting they are (as long they do not lead to immediate violence), this is a far cry from an organ of the government expressing such views or acting in an illegal way by doing so.

In addition, the U.S. Constitution spells out clearly that it is illegal to discriminate based on religion. Thus, the United States government has made its legal opinion known on the worldwide scourge of anti-Semitism.

CAIR labels itself as a “Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization” and pretends to speak for all Muslims. A 2011 Gallup poll found that more than 88 percent of Muslims felt that CAIR does not represented their interests). 

The truth is, CAIR speaks for Islamist supremacists – Muslims who believe that sharia law--which is not at all in alignment with the U.S. Constitution--should be enacted as a worldwide system of government.

In a press release announcing the Texas lawsuit, CAIR billed the BDS movement as a movement for Palestinian rights, [like the right to terrorize and kill Israelis] in spite of the Palestinians themselves who feel the movement only hurts them by destroying jobs they otherwise had with Israeli companies forced by the movement to relocate out of the disputed territories.

CAIR was designated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terror-funding trial in U.S. history. The trial found executives of the Holy Land Foundation guilty of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas in 2008. Despite a legal appeal launched by CAIR to have this status changed, the next year, a U.S. district court upheld CAIR’s designation as an unindicted co-conspirator because of “ample evidence” linking it to Hamas.

Never forget that fact.

Another fact: in November 2014, CAIR was designated as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked entities.

Islamist anti-Semitism is as old as Islam itself. CAIR, along with other Islamists, have worked overtime to create a new strategy to introduce this long-standing bigotry into mainstream discourse, and in many U.S. universities and leftist culture, it's working.

They have done this through creating the “Islamophobia” narrative, which serves two purposes: First, it asserts that Muslims are victims of racism, in spite of the fact that Islam is not a race. But lately, the definition of racism has expanded, so take it for what it's worth.

Second, one of the worst things to be called in the West is a racist. Nobody wants to bear that title. And this is what the Islamophobia narrative tries to do.  By doing so, it immediately shuts off all criticism of Islamic ideology and the dialog is over.

Now that Islamists made Muslims out to be a privileged group because of their intersectional status as victims, they made alliances with other victim-status groups, such as the Women's March in the U.S. and the Yellow Vests in France.

Once Islamists established that that Muslims were a privileged group (because of their victimhood status), they went about making alliances with other victim-status groups, where anti-Semitism has become the rallying cry for grassroots political movements. Now the Yellow Vests and Women's March movements can  blame the country’s ills on the Jews, and it's easy to bring out this ancient canard as a rallying point.

CAIR’s latest tactic against the state of Texas should be exposed for what it really is: blatant anti-Semitism. 

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.



No comments:

Post a Comment

BREAKING: Trump claims win after Manhattan DA concedes in "hush money" case

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg told Judge Juan Merchan to postpone the sentencing in the falsified business records case against Pr...