Welcome to my blog. Here you will find information that is both interesting and useless. You can even see how Steve, my camera, sees the world through my eyes, or get your hands on my latest novel, Jihad Joe at:


Thanks for visiting. Hope you enjoyed the coffee and cake. Sorry we ran out of donuts.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Sunnis Killing Shi'tes Killing Infidels, Killing, Killing

Islamabad (as opposed to Islamagood) Pakistan -- a Shi'ite mosque in southern Pakistan was bombed. The death toll was 56 and 31  were wounded, during Friday prayers. As you may know, all Islamic prayers began with Al Fatiha, a prayer which praises Allah and concludes with: 

"Guide us on the straight path, the path of those who have received your grace; not the path of those who have brought down wrath, nor of those who wander astray."

Al Fatiha, because it starts off each sura, is recited a minimum of 17 times a day. In the prayer, the people who are referred to as "those who have brought down wrath" [from Allah] are the Jews. And "those who wander astray" are the Christians.

Last month, 150 people, mostly children, were killed at a Peshawar school. The school, like the mosque, was Shi'ite, and the terrorists were Sunni, a group called Jundullah claiming responsibility.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif condemned the violence, calling it a suicide bombing, but the cause is still under investigation. It may have been a planted bomb to ensure that no Islamic terrorists were hurt in making this latest attack.

Fahad Mahsud, a Jundallah terrorist group spokes-scum, claimed responsibility for the attack in a phone call to the Associated Press, but he provided no details as to how the bombing was carried out. His mother must be proud of him, along with the prophet of Islam, Mohammed, for working for such a prestigious terrorist organization.

You see, insofar as Sunnis are concerned, Shi'ites are infidels. Insofar as Shi'ites are concerned, Sunnis are infidels. The rest of the world, to both Sunni and Shi'ites, are infidels. Every Muslim of either belief is supposed to kill everyone else. Pretty screwed up, isn't it?

Shi'ites make up about 15% of Pakistan's population, but the Sunnis don't consider them true Muslims. The division dates back to the death of Mohammed and the question as to who was to take over the leadership of the Muslim nation. The Sunnis believed the leadership should go to Mo's comrades in war, and the new dude in charge should be elected among the best warrior-terrorists. Abu Bakr became the first Caliph. (This name should sound familiar--Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi head of ISIS took the name.) 

But there was another group of Muslims who believed the leader should come from Mo's own family, among those specifically appointed by him, or among imams appointed by God herself. (Just kidding--Muslims would never think that God could be a female--they see women as inferior, generally more evil than men, and stupid as goats, which sometimes became a dilemma of choice.)

So the Shia Muslims think that once Mohammed died, the leadership should have been given to his cousin/son-in-law, Ali bin Abu Talib. Thus, all through Islamic history, Shi'ites have not recognized elected Muslim leaders but chose to follow the lineage of imams they thought Mo, or God (same-old, same-old) had appointed. In fact, the word "Shia" in Arabic means a group or supportive party of people, and the term has been shortened from "Shia-t-Ali" or "the Party of Ali."

All-in-all, it's hard to imagine any group, other than their own, that Sunnis or Shi'ites like. If you're not one of them, then you're viewed as an infidel, deserving of the fires of hell, and the more orthodox of both groups would be happy to send you on your way to Jahannam ASAP.

So it's no surprise that Sunni Muslims bombed a Shi'ite mosque, or that both Islamic groups hate Jews and Christians as much as they hate each other. Well, they both really, really hate Jews. They hate Christians slightly less, and are patiently willing to kill them last.

It's quite sad that innocent people have been killed in the name of religion. But make no mistake, this is the reason terrorism exists. 
"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil--that takes religion." --Steven Weinberg
I agree with Weinberg in general, but disagree with the notion that all religions can make us do evil. Today, this premise fits best with the one religion that's doing most of the killing of those who do not follow it: Islam. 

I don't see any Amish, Jains, Hindus, Jews or Methodists blowing up schools, killing innocent people, or praying for the demise of those from religions that differ from theirs. Yes, some scripture may sound barbaric, but the only scripture that's being followed in such an orthodox manner is "the religion of peace." What a horrible joke.

Islam is far from being a religion of peace. Read the Koran, you'll see.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Mark Zuckerberg's Softer, More Frightened Side

Money can buy you bodyguards, but it cannot buy you courage or keep you from appearing a coward in the eyes of the world.

Mark Zuckerberg is like Obama in that he often says things that people want to hear, but his words are about as honest as a "Three-Card Monty" shark.

Just two weeks after Zuckerberg symbolically grabbed his crotch to protect his "boys," while saying "je suis Charlie" (following the attack on the satirical magazine) he now shows the world who he really is: an inconsistent lying coward.

His website, Facebook, is censoring, in Turkey, images of the prophet of Islam, the "pedophile of the desert,"  the one, the only, Mohammad, peas be up in him. In spite of the fact that he flexed his CEO muscles back in early January, Facebook refuses to post any images of Mohammad, and doesn't even show the newsworthy photo originally seen at Charlie Hebdo.

The Post stated that Facebook is blocking a significant number of pages that "offended the Prophet Muhammad." This has been confirmed to the BBC by a person not authorized to speak publicly on Zuckerberg's disgraceful, disgusting, and wussy move, admitting that Facebook moved to "block content so that it's no longer visible in Turkey following a valid legal request."

So it's one thing to act as if you believe in freedom of speech and expression, and quite another to back it up.

Here's what Zuckerberg said:

We are allowing Sharia law to run the way we live and do business. Soon it will be the law of the land if we continue this insanity. There are too many Mark Zuckerberg's in this world who believe that they are protected by their appeasement of the alligator, when, in fact, it plans to eat them too.

Obama al-Jazeera bin Lyin

How different is Al-Jazeera's whitewashing of Islamic barbarism from the Obama administration's? Answer: as different as identical twins.

Al-Jazeera America began by pretending it would cover the news honestly and in depth, but it apparently has as much depth as the snake oil salesman, Al Jazeera Gore, who sold them the slot in 2013 from Current.

The National Review obtained an email that directed Al Jazeera's propagandist "reporters" to not use terms such as "jihad," Islamist," and "terrorist." A top executive for the company, Carlos Van Meek, wrote to the New York and Washington newsrooms about how words can become problematic and also said, "One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter."
"Freedom fighter" shoots unarmed cop

Or "activist," if you work for CNN, as Christiane Amanpour called the Charlie Hebdo terrorists who massacred the staff at the newspaper. 

Scum buckets who kill children, behead journalists and others while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" are not freedom fighters. The children and journalists they kill are not in any way compromising their freedom. They are terrorists, and Islamic terrorists to be clear. The people who killed 3000 Americans and others on 911 were not freedom fights or militants; they were terrorists, of the Islamic kind.

Van Meek, who fits his name, said we should call terrorists "militants," or "fighters." He said that calling them extremists is forbidden. "Do not use the term Islamist," he said, because it's a "simplistic label."

Van Meek's level of political correctness has reached a point of pandering to Islamic terrorists. Al Jazeera is a champion at pandering--before they pandered in America, they pandered to Osama bin Laden and his terrorists of the Islamic kind. 

But don't fret, patriots, Al Jazeera has about as many prime-time viewers (18,000) as an Al Sharpton anti-white march.

So what about Obama and the boys on the left? Well, they're trying to convince us that Jordan's plan to swap Sajida al-Rishawi the terrorist, for Muath al-Kaseasbeh, the Jordanian pilot, is not the same as the Bergdahl trade last year. 

Bergdahl, a deserter at best, and a traitor at worst, was traded for the release of 5 Taliban terrorists at worst, and Islamic terrorists at best from Gitmo. 

Eric Schultz from the State Department made the case that the Taliban is not a terrorist group but an "armed insurgency." This Obama butt-boy claimed that "we don't pay ransom, we don't give concessions to terrorist organizations." So by this logic, the Taliban cannot be a terrorist organization because we made a concession. That's what we call an argument from fallacy:

We only make concessions with non-terrorist organizations.
We made concessions with the Taliban.
Therefore, the Taliban is a non-terrorist organization.

What we need to consider, in order to determine whether or not the Taliban is a terrorist organization, is our observations and the answers to the following questions:

1. If the Taliban was designated a terrorist organization during the Obama administration in 2010, and identified Hakimullah Mehsud and Wali ur-Rehman as specially designated global terrorists, has anything changed to declassify the Taliban as terrorists?

2. Does the killing of 141 people, 132 of them children at a Peshawar school by the Taliban, qualify them as terrorists?

3. Does the use of Improvised Explosive Devices, used to indiscriminately kill human beings, qualify the users of such devices (i.e., the Taliban) as terrorists?

If you still think the Taliban is merely an "armed insurgency," you might be a lberal.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Deal of a Life

Not even her hairdresser knows
Jordan has finally agreed to release "the sister of the Caliphate," Sajida al-Rishawi, a one-time Islamic beauty queen, whose explosive vest failed to go off and kill innocent civilians in a Jordan hotel back in 2006. She wants a "do-over," I suspect. 

By releasing the fetching hijab-covered Sajida, ISIS said it would release the Jordanian pilot held hostage, but left Japan in the dark about their journalist who they planned to behead as they did with the other Japanese man who was killed.

By dealing with the enemy of human life, the door has been left open over the issue of negotiating with puss-bags. When asked about Jordan's position, Jen Psaki, State Department spokes liberal said that every country "has the ability and right to make decisions.," but added, "we don't make concessions to terrorists."

Unless it's to trade five Islamic terrorists for a deserter and traitor. But it must not be important since she wasn't pinned down with a question about that deal.

Eric Schultz (no relation to Ed Schultz, who isn't human to begin with) said that U.S. policy insists "we don't pay ransom, we don't give concessions to terrorist organizations," tried to distinguish the current proposed trade with the terrorist scumbag-traitor trade (i.e., 5 Taliban for 1 Bergdahl) by claiming it was part of an "end of conflict interaction." He then threw more bull excrement claiming the Taliban are an "armed insurgency," while ISIS is a "terrorist group."

Honestly, how stupid does this administration think the American people are? I thought after the Gruber nailing they would have learned their lesson, not to insult our intelligence. But then again, they did fool the left into thinking Obama can walk on water. It was easy to do because Obama believes it himself.
Sajida exposes herself

To say the Taliban is not a terrorist group is an insult to terrorist groups. When you shoot a woman in the back of the head for showing her wrist, what would you call them, a disciplinary team?

I think the trade Jordan plans to make is actually a good one. Surprise! I believe so because the pilot, Lt. Muath al-Kaseasbeh, is a valuable asset with all the training he has received. That is not to minimize the propaganda value of the hottie who wasn't hot enough to go off. She may go off in the future, which would be a tragedy. Hopefully, she will go off prematurely and kill a few comrades along the way. (Does she get 72 virgin dudes when she goes?)

We don't know what Kenji Goto the Japanese journalist's fate is going to be. I don't think my making a prediction matters one iota, but I can only hope they make him part of the deal. 

I don't know how much Jordan cares if they deal for the journalist or not. After all, he is an infidel.

A reporter is abducted by Islamic terrorists and taken to a safe house where his captors demand the release three Gitmo prisoners. If the President refuses, they will behead the reporter and show it on the Internet. But the U.S. does not bargain with terrorists.

The clock is ticking . . .
Jihad Joe: a Novel  Amazon’s soft-cover book

Jihad Joe see it here e-book version 

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Islamic State Threatens Obama--Vows to Make USA a Muslim Province

In a new grisly beheading video, ISIS threatened our so-called president and said it would make our country into a Muslim province. But no worries--the Islamic State isn't Islamic so they would likely screw it up and make us into an Amish state, or maybe a Jewish state.

The dickwad in the video says they will kill Jordanian and Japanese hostages if the hostage held in Jordan is not freed. 
That isn't a girdle

Who is this Muslim, you ask. Her name is Sajida al-Rishawi, aka "sister of the Caliphate" as she is called by ISIS. She was sentenced to death in 2006 but a Jordanian moratorium on the death sentence saved her terrorist butt. She admitted her role in the deaths of 57 innocent people at the Amman hotels. ISIS wants her to be released. She has been incarcerated for 9 years.

The dirtbag behind the Kurdish hostage in the video, hidden beneath a balaclava, spoke in Arabic, the language of the Koran, and said, "Know, oh Obama, that we will reach America. Know also that we will cut off your head in the White House, and transform America into a Muslim Province."

Barack Hussein Obama did not actually reply, but if he did, he might say this:

"Know ye, oh ISIS mujahedeen. You need not fret and frown over my residence in the White House for I am personally transforming America into a Muslim Province, but it's going to take some time. I ask that you be patient, but if you have to cut off a couple of heads along the way, you have my blessings, Inshallah."

If the American people, the patriots I mean, could reply, we might say:

"Know ye, oh scumbags in rags, that we will not rest until each and every one of you is killed, put in a pigskin sack, and buried upside-down with bacon in your mouth and a Koran shoved up your nether regions.

"You might kill some of us, but you cannot kill us all, and you cannot kill our spirit and our resolve. If you think you can take over the United States of America, Molon Labe, assholes."

We don't hide our faces
I think we have all reached a point where we know who the enemy is, and it isn't simply radical terrorists. They are radical Muslim terrorists who strictly follow the teachings of the Koran. It's time to stop lying to the American public and pretend that Islam isn't the problem or that the Islamic State has hijacked Islam. 

Everything al-Baghdadi is doing would be duplicated by the prophet of Islam, Muhammed, even though al-Baghdadi has a PhD in Islamic studies and Muhammed was an illiterate, Jew-hating, slave-owning, thieving, pedophile. What is al-Baghdadi doing any differently?

Monday, January 26, 2015

The Old Gray Anarchist NY Times

The Houthi rebels from Yemen, the same Islamic jihadist terrorists known for its chant of "Death to America," is being passed off by Rod Nordland and Eric Schmitt of The New York Times not merely as moderates but possible U.S. counter-terrorism partners.

Allahu akbar
Death to America
Death to Israel
Damn the Jews
Victory to Islam
The official slogan and emblem of the Houthis reads like a love story of a schizophrenic: "Death to America, death to Israel, damnation to the Jews." Put that in your nostrils and huff it, Chuck Schumer.

But The Times reassures us they're only kidding, even though the Houthis shout it when marching, wear it on arm patches, spray it on buildings, and proudly display it in their car windows. 

The emblem is in red, framed by "Allah is greater," and "Victory to Islam" is in green on a white background. To add a little flair, they sometimes make the red part of the emblem look like it's dripping blood.

According to the idiots at The Times, "But for all their harsh sloganeering, the Houthis may be a lot more moderate than it suggests, according to many diplomats and analysts who have followed them closely. They said it would be premature to dismiss them as Yemen's Hezbollah, despite their alliance with Iran." 

Why do I get the feeling that neither Nordland or Schmitt are Jewish? I'm not even certain they're actually Americans.

Anyone who still takes The New York Times seriously, might have gone over to the dark side of progressivism.

A reporter is abducted by Islamic terrorists and taken to a safe house where his captors demand the release three Gitmo prisoners. If the President refuses, they will behead the reporter and show it on the Internet. But the U.S. does not bargain with terrorists.

The clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Amazon’s soft-cover book

Jihad Joe see it here e-book version