Welcome to my blog. Here you will find information that is both interesting and useless. You can even see how Steve, my camera, sees the world through my eyes, or get your hands on my latest novel, Jihad Joe at:


Thanks for visiting. Hope you enjoyed the coffee and cake. Sorry we ran out of donuts.

Monday, August 20, 2018

Doubled up Darwin Awards: woman tries to outrun car in her high heels

Austin -- The Darwin Awards is going to have a tough time deciding between two strong contenders as to who gets the trophy: the woman who bragged that she could "run fast in heels" or the idiot driver who proved her wrong.

An Austin half-man, half-cretin is facing criminal charges for running over a woman as she attempted to sprint across a road to prove her speed in heels.

The woman was walking back from a bar around 2:30 a.m. Saturday with her sister when an unidentified guy asked her if she could run in the shoes she was wearing. To show the stranger, who she evidently trusted not to do anything untoward to her, started to run across the road.

A maroon SUV drove toward her, hit and dragged the woman about 15 yards as she tried to get to the other side of an intersection along Interstate 35, [ironically the same number as her IQ] according to the Austin PD.

One witness told the cops the driver kept going after hitting the brilliant woman, but "continued to drive east . . . until it was no longer in view."

Police, evidently on a late-night donut run, arrived at the scene about 20 minutes later. They spotted the SUV nearby and identified the driver as Felipe Hernandez.

Hernandez, whose age and IQ are 21, told police "he knew he had hit someone, and proceeded through the northbound service road light, made a U-turn, and sat in his vehicle crying before returning to the scene," his affidavit states.

"I was like, you know, cryin' man. I mean, like, I hit her and stuff, and like that's like bad," Hernandez like said. "I wish I like didn't challenge her, you know?"

The woman was transported to a nearby hospital for a "brain bleed and needed immediate surgery," police said.

Hernandez was charged with failure to stop and render aid, which is a third-degree felony. Why he was only charged with that and not vehicular assault is a mystery.

Hopefully, due to the apparent size of the woman's brain, no serious damage has occurred.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

John Brennan lies like a Persian rug

It's almost laughable that former CIA director John Brennan wants to sue the Trump administration because the president took away his security clearance. But let's not kid ourselves, it's totally laughable.

Brennan is as believable as a Stormy Daniels climax.

Let's look at his history.

In 2011 Brennan swore to Congress that scores of drones abroad have not killed even one noncombatant; not one civilian, only the bad guys. But both Brennan and Barack Obama received many reports of civilian deaths.

Perhaps he was under presidential orders to lie, but it's still a lie and if that was the case, it also makes Obama culpable as a liar. But we knew that long ago.

In 2012, Brennan released information about having a double agent in Yemen, which put the agent in jeopardy.

As CIA director in 2014, Brennan swore to Congress that the CIA never illegally accessed the computers of U.S. Senate staffers who just so happened to be looking into the CIA's role in the torturing of detainees.

In fact, Brennan told Andrea Mitchell: "As far as the allegations of the CIA hacking into Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth . . . "We wouldn't do that. I mean, that's just beyond the, you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we do."

Even the Democrats were angry at him and called for his resignation. And it was only after months of his lies, when the CIA's inspector general report was released, did Brennan apologize to the senators he spied on because he got caught.

In May 2017, Brennan most likely lied to Congress when questioned by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC).

Brennan said that he had no idea who commissioned the Christopher Steele dossier and lied again when he claimed that the CIA did not rely on that dossier for action on the Russia investigation. But retired NSA director Michael Rogers and former director of the National Intelligence Agency James Clapper, both admitted the dossier, along with the knowledge that it was a Clinton campaign-funded product, absolutely did help shape the Obama's intelligence community interagency assessments and actions, often with the push by Brennan.

There are many reports that, while he denied knowledge about the dossier, he was a covert conduit to ensure it was widely disseminated, as evidenced in the meeting he had with Sen. Harry Reid in August 2016.

Brennan briefed Reid on the dossier's unverified content in hopes Reid would pressure the FBI to dig deeper in the investigations which Reid actually did two days later with a call he made to James Comey.

Now Brennan is complaining that taking away his security clearance will silence him. Ironically, he hasn't shut up about this since Trump yanked it from him. He threatened to take legal action, but if he does, he will be exposed as the security risk and mentally deranged Communist-voting scumcrumpet that he is.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Jewish Dem. group rejects MN lawmaker's anti-Semitic statements

What in the world is wrong with the voters of Minnesota? They voted for Keith Ellison, an anti-zionist and friend of anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, and another anti-Zionist Muslima Ilhan Omar is favored to take Ellison's seat in Congress after she won her Democratic primary on Tuesday in a heavily Democratic district in the state.

Omar will face Republican Jennifer Zielinski in the November midterms.

If Omar wins, and she is favored to take the seat, she will replace Ellison as he runs for Minnesota state attorney general. Ellison has been accused of sexual abuse by an ex-girlfriend, but as a black Muslim Democrat, the Me Too movement doesn't apply to him and he won the primary easily.

Omar isn't the only Muslim American who hates Israel and the Jews who live there. In Michigan last week, Rashida Tlaib won her primary and runs unopposed in November--she can't lose. Tlaib has called for cutting US assistance to Israel, which she has called "discriminatory" and would like Hamas to get their share of the booty. The Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA) has condemned her call.

After Omar's win, the JDCA told the media that it "strongly condemns Ms. Omar's past statements characterizing Israel as an "apartheid state," as well as her bloviating that Israel is "hypnotizing the world" to ignore it's so-called "evil doings," such as providing medical help to injured Palestinians who live in Gaza as well as providing jobs, even in the Israeli government and treating women as equal citizens. Everything opposite to what the Palestinian Authority does. No Jews live in Gaza--at least, not very long.

"Now that Ms. Omar has emerged as the Democratic candidate, JDCA will not support her candidacy--and certainly will not endorse her--because her views are not aligned with our positions and values," the group said.

Maybe Jewish liberals will eventually wake up and see that it's the GOP and other conservatives who support Israel and Jerusalem as its capital.

But probably not.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Deadly racism in S. Africa against white people

Cyril Ramaphosa [his surname means: "sex with a butterfly"] was elected earlier this year and has committed his African National Congress (ANC) to forcibly taking back land that has been worked and cultivated by white farmers.

ANC chairman Gwede Mantashe [his surname means: "an incredibly full mustache"] said last week, causing panic: "You shouldn't own more than 25,000 acres of land.

"Therefore if you own more, it should be taken without compensation. People who are privileged never give away privilege as a matter of a gift. And that is why we say, to give you the tools, revisit the constitution so that you have a legal tool to do it."

But the unions of both black and white farmers condemned the idea and predicted such a move would lead to job losses and possible starvation in S. Africa.

Omri van Zyl, head of the Agri SA union representing mostly white commercial farmers said: "The mood among our members is very solemn.

"They are confused about the lack of any apparent strategy from the government and many are panicking. So many farms are up for sale, more than we've ever had, but no one is buying."

Gee, I wonder why.

It makes you wish that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would help solve the situation, being such an expert on government control of resources.

Of course the move will destroy property rights and deter investment.

In nearby Zimbabwe, there have been violent land seizures under the authorization of Robert Mugabe in the 1990s that sent the country into a nosedive from which it never recovered.

White farmers along with their families are being forced out, often in a casket, if there's enough remains to bury.

Practically speaking, about 20 percent of SA's farms produce 80 percent of the food that feeds millions of people in southern Africa and many of those farms will be affected by the acreage cap.

Even the National African Farmer's Union (Nafu), which represents black farmers, agreed the idea of kicking white farmers off from their larger farms, would lead to job losses.

But racists care little for the outcomes of their actions beyond the hatred they are able to inflict upon those who have less melanin. It's like the story of the scorpion and the frog except the scorpion cannot help itself.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Sunday, August 19, 2018

Al Sharptongue ain't got no 'R-E-S-P-I-C-T" for Trump

Don't let Sharptongue's suit and gestures fool
you, he's an idiot and a race-baiter
R-E-S-P-I-C-T, tell you what it menes to me . . . 
It is truly amazing how anyone who hates President Trump can have a say on MSNBC. Worse, it seems as if anyone who hates Trump who fits the intersectionality requirements to be taken seriously can be a host on one of their shows.
Case in point, the very, very extremely incredible right but leftist Reverend Al Sharptongue of the We Hate Whitey Perpetual Motion Church has his own show on the far left network. It's laughingly called "PoliticsNation." It's a show where Big Al gets to say stuff off the top of his misshapen head [that would have made Queen Nefertiti proud.]

The genius was addressing the president's insults toward Omarosa, another winner who Trump evidently liked because "she said nice things about [me]." Big Al called upon Trump to be respectful in his rhetoric toward women and then misquoted the late, great Aretha Franklin in her most famous lyric.

"I think [lie] you might've learned the lesson this week, sometimes the dog bites back with a book deal," Sharptongue said.

The race baiter finished his comments with a reference to Franklin's 1967 hit "Respect," in which she spelled out the word. She and Sharptongue were friends [he is also good friends with the famous co-anti-Semite, Louis Farrakhan].

"So in the words of my late friend Aretha Franklin," he shamelessly said, using her death and her words as a prop, "show some R-E-S-P-I-C-T, and the next time you get a black woman and a beagle confused, remember this: I got you."

Rev. Al then launched into a black rendition of Sonny and Cher's "I Got You, Babe."

In the song, Ms. Franklin actually knew how to spell the word 'respect,' but Big Al forgot to study up on the sitchuasion.

Then he goes: "You know what they say about payback, it's a real, well, I'm sure you know the word I'm thinking of," Sharptongue said, not saying the word 'bitch' because he's a reverend [like Mahmoud Abbas is a Jew].

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Bolton suggest Brennan may have misused classified info.

National Security Adviser John Bolton suggested on Sunday that former CIA director John "Verbose" Bolton may have misused classified information and that the "unprecedented leaks" from this administration may be the catalyst for broader change in how security clearances are handled.

It's about time.

Bolton was in the Jewish State for the first time in his role as a Trump administration official. He was there to discuss national security issues with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu along with other top officials.

"In terms of what [Brennan] said, since he left, a number of people have commented that he couldn't be in the position he is in, criticizing Trump, unless he did use classified info," Bolton told the leftist ABC's "This Week" on Sunday. "I don't know the specifics, but I do know when he was [CIA] director, I was troubled by comments in public, and the politicization."

The mustachioed Bolton added: "My opinion is that he was politicizing intelligence," and saying that Brennan failed to keep intact the "wall of separation between intelligence and policy."

POTUS revoked Brennan's unnecessary security clearance on Wednesday, saying [Trump never suggests, he says] that Brennan has politicized his security clearance and misled Congress about CIA spying in the Senate.

He also voted for the Communist Party and called Trump treasonous, which is a death penalty offense.

Bolton suggested that a broader review of who should retain their security clearance after leaving government service may be needed.

"I think it's certainly appropriate in a time of unprecedented leaks of classified info," he said. "I don't see that there would be anything wrong if it were determined to go that way to review the policies about former officials having clearances. Sometimes it can be useful."

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

CNN guest screams at Trump supporter to 'We're done, get out!'

A debate-challenged Creative News Network (CNN) guest named Phil Mudd was on a panel with Paris Dennard, a deplorable Trump supporter. They were discussing the John Brennan situation in which Democratic operative, Brennan, lost his security clearance.

The debate got very heated over the issue of President Trump revoking Brennans's clearance on Friday night.

It went like this:

"A lot of these people that have these security clearances, and this is the secret in swampy Washington, D.C., they have them and they keep them because it's profitable for them after they leave government," Dennard said. "Because if you have a security clearance, especially high level security clearances, your contracts and your consultation gig pay you a lot more money because of the access you have."

Mudd tried to debate with: "When I am requested to sit on an advisory board, let me ask you one question, how much do you think I'm paid to do that at the request of the U.S. Government? Give me one answer, and you've got ten seconds. How much?"

Dennard was being timed by Mudd and said, "Well, I will be clear in saying that everybody in Washington, D.C. knows if you don't want to be honest about it, that's on you, but if you have a security clearance and you keep it, you get more money to have it."

Mudd, who forgot that it wasn't his show shouted: "We're done. We're done. Get out!" He looked as if he was going to spit and maybe shout the "N" word, but he held it together.

See the video below for the entire confrontation.

Dennard wasn't a bit flustered. He came back with: "It's not your show. I'm staying right here. Don't be so defensive about this. Your voice is still here. You can still do whatever you want. But the politicalization [sic] of the intelligence community under this administration with the people coming on here every day, tweeting and talking about this administration, you all have made it about politics."

Mudd reaction is no different than those of many Democrats who can't stand it when conservatives or anyone with different views try to debate them publicly. Ocasio-Cortez is a good example of this, but her reason is not that she can't stand the opposite viewpoint, she's afraid to debate the opposition. Mudd thinks by trying to intimidate the other side that he's a winner.

The only winners he has are in his nose.

Finally, notice how the host on CNN never takes a neutral position but does all that he can to defend Mudd.

Security clearances are a privilege not an entitlement. If these people are called in to discuss matters [and Brennan never will be one of those people] there can be a way to restore the clearance quickly rather than paying $20,000 every few years to renew them for each individual.

Your comments are welcome here whether you agree or disagree.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Calif. bill to limit kids' choice of drinks in restaurants

First they came for my burrito . . . 

Sacramento -- If California gets its way, and it probably will, a new bill will pass giving kids only two choices of beverage at restaurants: milk or water which will not be imbibed through a plastic straw.

Senate Bill 1192 would order milk or water to be the default beverage for kids. The reason for the bill is to reduce obesity and other bills are likely to be considered to the same end.

For example, the state senate is considering a bill to end the sale of all products containing over 15 percent of fat or sugar, and includes, but is not limited to: bacon, burgers, chicken, chips of all kinds, ice cream, donuts, fries, beer, pizza, cheeses, all fried foods, candy, chocolate, cakes, croissants, and butter.

Bill 1192 has passed the ASSembly and is on its way to Gov. Moonbeam's desk. After he signs it, California will be the first state in the nation to experience an internal revolution or exodus, whichever residents choose.
Will get you 10 to 20 years in the slammer
"Cancer is fought in the halls of government, not just in the halls of the hospital," Stephanie Winn of the American Cancer Society said. "And if we have to make laws to stop you from destroying yourselves, that's just too damn bad. Deal with it," she added.

Her group is just one of many supporting a government that knows what's best for us and will force us to make the right choices because those will be the only ones left to make.

Winn [no relation to Steve, I think] argues that kid's meals shouldn't come with a side order of diseases or flavor.

The bill still allows parents to order alternatives, but they will have to ask for it, and if they do, they will be monitored and recorded for additional child abuse behavior, such as super-sizing, which will carry significant legal penalties.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.