Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Ilhan Omar slipped another $150K to her alleged paramour's consulting firm

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) paid an additional $150,000 to Tim Mynett's political consulting firm a mere 3 months after it was revealed by The New York Post. It has been alleged, according to records, that Mynett is schtupping Omar and had been doing so while she was married, this time, not to her brother.

The 37-year-old anti-Semitic congresswoman’s campaign has funneled $146,712.63 to Mynett’s E Street Group since The New York Post reported allegations in August that she was having an affair with her paid consultant.

The latest payments to Mynett’s group were for digital advertising, fundraising consulting and video production. He did not charge her for his other service to her.

When news of the alleged adulterous shenanigans broke, Omar had already paid $223,000 through her campaign since 2018 for fundraising consulting, internet advertising, digital communications, and travel expenses to the E Street Group. The latest grand total is now $370,000.

However, the federal agency slated to probe the campaign finance complaint [against the woman who said of the 911 attacks in 2001 that "some people did something"] is unable to act due to lack of commissioners on the bench to investigate the matter. So Omar did something and apparently will get away with it.

Both Omar and her "alleged" lover Mynett have denied the allegations in Beth Mynett’s divorce papers that states the consultant dumped his wife in April because he was having an affair with the Somali-born [Jew-hater] woman.

In October, Omar filed for divorce from her husband, [who in this case is not her biological brother who she previously divorced] Ahmed Hirsi amid the affair allegations — claiming the marriage was “irretrievable.” The split was finalized on Nov. 5 of this year.

Conservative watchdog the National Legal and Policy Center filed a complaint against Omar with the Federal Election Commission in the wake of the bombshell report — seeking a probe into whether the Democrat used campaign funds to rendezvous [for coitus] with her "alleged" lover.

The Federal Elections Commission requires at least four members to vote on complaints but currently have only three of six commissioner slots filled. Thus they are impotent to do anything about the complaint.

The FEC complaint focused on the fact that more than $12,673.43 of the payments to Mynett were simply labelled “travel expenses” — a potential breach of campaign finance law which states that travel expenses be itemized.

“Our question is whether this was necessary travel or whether she was just bringing her boyfriend along for the company,” NLPC Chairman Peter Flaherty said in August.

FEC spokesman Christian Hilland on Friday said the agency was still open for business but needed the US Senate to confirm a fourth member until it begins investigating campaign finance violations again.

“We are willing to accept reports but we are not able to move forward with any investigatory matters,” he said.

Meanwhile, Omar is free to be obnoxious and anti-Semitic.



Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.







DOJ files response to Strzok's lawsuit: shows texts about wife finding his cell phone

Photo: AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok was fired from the agency and sued for unlawful termination. The photo [above] shows him testifying before a House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, on July 12, 2018. The hearing concerned "oversight on FBI and Department of Justice actions regarding the 2016 presidential election.

In response to Strzok's frivolous lawsuit the DOJ filed a response which can be seen here. The motion contains a letter dated August 8, 2018 signed by Candace Will, the Assistant Director of the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility.

Strzok was removed from Robert Mueller’s profligate Special Counsel investigation team after his covert extramarital affair with FBI lawyer Lisa Page and their anti-Trump text messages were discovered in the summer of 2017. The weird agent was then fired from the FBI in August 2018 and has since filed a lawsuit claiming that his “due process rights were infringed upon,” much like President Trump's due process rights are being infringed upon in the impeachment hearings.

In addition, his lawsuit claimed that the DOJ aimed to “humiliate him and smear his reputation when it disclosed nearly 400 text messages he had sent or received.” In truth, however, Strzok has done a fine job humiliating himself.

President Trump, never being one to shy away from a heartfelt Twitter attack, targeted Strzok at the time.

Strzok's lawyer claimed, “While many in law enforcement have faced attacks by this president, Pete Strzok has been a constant target for two years. It’s indisputable that his termination was a result of President Trump’s unrelenting retaliatory campaign of false information, attacks and direct appeals to top officials.”

See, it's okay to attack a duly elected president of the United States and try to throw him out of office, but once you go after a poor soul on Twitter, you've gone too far.

The DOJ’s motion argues that Strzok’s “allegation that his due process rights were infringed upon would be soundly rejected due to his position on FBI’s Senior Executive Service at the time of his firing” and said he’d been “given ample notice and opportunity to be heard.” They also stated that he was terminated because it infringed on the FBI's ability to be a trusted, nonpartisan institution and had nothing to do with Trump's tweets.

The 27-page document goes on to say that Strzok made numerous violations in text messages which were inappropriate political comments on his FBI-issued cell phone. He also used his personal email account [in Hillary Clinton style] to conduct FBI business and failed to diligently pursue a significant investigative lead in Hillary's email investigation.

In other words, Strzok's failure to act when informed in September 2016 that Hillary Clinton's emails were discovered on Anthony Weiner's laptop, was more than enough to get rid of Strzok.

The present DOJ filing contains new text exchanges between Strzok and Lisa Page involving his wife discovering their sordid affair after she gained access to the philanderer's phone. The wife also called Lisa Page from Strzok's cell phone and left several voicemails.

Strzok: “My wife has my phone.”

Page: “Your wife left me a VM. Am I supposed to respond? She thinks we’re having an affair. Should I call and correct her understanding? Leave this to you to address?” [It is clear that Strzok's wife's understanding needed no correcting. These two shameless cheaters were caught.]

Strzok: “I don’t know. I said we were close friends and nothing more. She knows I sent you flowers. I said you were having a tough week.”

As the saying goes: good riddance to bad rubbish.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.







Monday, November 18, 2019

Buttigieg campaign hit with scandal involving black community

Fake moderate Democratic, far-left presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg has a new scandal to deal with involving the black community. Reports bubbled to the top of the bath water over the weekend that indicate the gay Indiana mayor falsely claimed he was endorsed by the black community, but used stock photos from Africa to portray African-Americans. He then claimed that he had support of hundreds of black voters who turned out to be almost as white as Elizabeth Warren.

Buttigieg has been struggling to gain support among black voters because of how poorly the South Bend, Indiana community fared under his leadership as the mayor, and over how he handled an officer involved shooting of a black man.

According to The Intercept, Buttigieg released his campaign's main policy outreach plan to black voters called "The Douglass Plan: A Comprehensive Investment in the Empowerment of Black America." It covers everything from public health care to criminal justice reform and more and would use federal contracting policies to increase the number of contracts going to minority- and women-owned firms by 25 percent, because identity politics is the Democrat's way of life. It also offers student loan deferment and forgiveness to Pell Grant recipients who later start businesses of at least 3 people, leaving banking institutions 'holding the proverbial bag.'

Buttigieg’s campaign began promoting a list of 400 black South Carolina voters that it claimed supported his plan, but it turned out that nearly half of the list was whiter than the driven snow and Elizabeth Warren.

Of important note, the top three black people that Mayor Pete claimed supported his plan all pushed back against his claims, and said his campaign was dishonest.

The three alleged "prominent [Buttigieg] supporters" each responded in an open letter to the HBCU Times [Historically Black Colleges and Universities]. HBCU focuses on "positive news related to Historically Black Colleges and Universities."

Columbia City Councilwoman Tameika Devine:
“Clearly from the number of calls I received about my endorsement, I think the way they put it out there wasn’t clear, that it was an endorsement of the plan, and that may have been intentionally vague. I’m political, I know how that works. I do think they probably put it out there thinking people wouldn’t read the fine print or wouldn’t look at the details or even contact the people and say, ‘Hey, you’re endorsing Mayor Pete?’”
Rehoboth Baptist pastor and state Rep. Ivory Thigpen:
“How it was rolled out was not an accurate representation of where I stand. I didn’t know about its rolling out. Somebody brought it to my attention, and it was alarming to me, because even though I had had conversations with the campaign, it was clear to me, or at least I thought I made it clear to them, that I was a strong Bernie Sanders supporter – actually co-chair of the state, and I was not seeking to endorse their candidate or the plan. But what I had talked about was potentially giving them a quote of support in continuing the conversation, because I do think it’s a very important conversation. I actually had not circled back to give them a quote, so I was alarmed and very much surprised to see, particularly, the headline as such because I do think it muddies the water, I do think it was a misrepresentation, and it easily could have confused a lot of people as to where I stood. That was, from the very beginning, concerns that I expressed.”
Johnnie Cordero, chair of state party's Black Caucus:
“I never endorsed that plan. I don’t know how my name got on there. … I had some difficulties with it. It’s entirely presumptuous. I’m not going to change what I’m going to say. It’s presumptuous to think you can come up with a plan for black America without hearing from black folk. … you don’t do that. Those days are over and done with. We’re tired of people telling us what we need. You wanna find out what we need? Come and ask us.”
The stock photo Buttigieg used to promote his plan was discovered to be that of a woman from Kenya who may or may not speak English and has probably never seen snow.

The Intercept reported the following quote from the woman: “Am the ‘woman’ featured on that photo by githiri Nicholas. what’s the meaning of the message accompanied by the photo? Have no idea of what’s happening..."

Fortunately for Buttigieg, he is gay and married to a dude. Thus the leftist media will not hold him up for scrutiny and will give him a free pass as he scores high on the intersectional scale of victimhood.

Expect Buttigieg to apologize and pretend he had no idea what his campaign had done.



Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.





Sunday, November 17, 2019

NY Times refuses to use the "T" word on al-Ata

The "Gray anti-Semitic" New York Times, a former newspaper, was okay with referring to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as a "terrorist," but they refrained from using that word to describe the "Palestinian" jihadi, aka terrorist, Bahu Abu al-Ata. [There is no such country as Palestine, thus the scare quotes.]

[H/T Jihad Watch]

You see, when Hamas or Islamic Jihad lobs rockets at Jewish civilians in Israel, they are not considered terrorists--they are 'freedom fighters' in the view of the former newspaper.

One can only wonder how the Times would have handled al-Ata's death if he committed similar atrocities as al-Baghdadi, perhaps videotaping similar barbaric behavior. But he merely planned the killing of civilian men, women and children and it wasn't on video, so the Times can pretend he wasn't a terrorist.

The first versions of the article was published in the early morning hours of November 12 after the terrorist was killed. The article at that time accurately noted Islamic Jihad’s terror designation — but that information was later scrubbed from the story. You'd think that Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) or Ilhan Omar (D-MN) wrote the story, but it was just another anti-Semitic crap weasel at the Times.

Like ISIS and Hamas, Islamic Jihad is designated worldwide as a terrorist group, including by the United States, the EU, Canada, Japan, as well as others.

Abu al-Ata was a senior leader of Islamic Jihad. 

His organization is responsible for countless attacks targeting civilians. Islamic Jihad has targeted Israeli restaurants, markets, buses, and shopping malls, causing mass casualties.  

Israeli intelligence learned that he was planning another such attack in the near future, which was why he was taken out before he could kill more innocent people.

He was clearly a terrorist and a piece of human waste. Good riddance!


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.




Saturday, November 16, 2019

Pelosi goes after James Rosen, gets toasted


Speaker Nancy "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi (D-CA) called journalist James Rosen of Sinclair Broadcast Group "Mr. Republican talking points" Thursday after he asked her a whistleblower question at a press conference.

"And so I wonder if you could explain to the American people why the legal rights of the whistleblower should prevail in this political setting over those of President Trump, who should ordinarily enjoy a right to confront his accuser," Rosen asked Pelosi.

Pelosi's feathers were ruffled.

"Well, let me just say this," Pelosi responded, her acrimonious smile betraying her anger as she pointed at Rosen. "I'll say to you, Mr. Republican Talking Points, what I said to the president of the United States: When you talk about the whistleblower, you're coming into my wheelhouse."

She then bragged, while unwittingly revealing her age:
 "I have more experience in intelligence than anybody in the Congress, anybody that's ever served, 25 years on the committee as top Democrat, ex officio, as Speaker and leader. I was there when we wrote the whistleblower laws. The whistleblower is there to speak truth to power and have protection for doing that. And any, any retribution or harm coming to a whistleblower undermines our ability to hear truth about power. So, I will defend the rights of the whistleblower vehemently, vehemently."

When Rosen pushed back, Pelosi said Trump can make his case to before those overseeing impeachment proceedings, adding that "the president is not above the law, the president will be held accountable, and nobody should have the right to endanger whistleblowers, and that is the system that I will defend, and the American people understand that."

The President also has a right to face his accuser, because his accuser also is not above the law, and legally, has no right to anonymity as Democrats would have us believe.

So how did Rosen, a journalist who was spied on by the Obama administration, react? By reporting how Pelosi grew "testy" to his question, which happens to be perfectly reasonable, adding that the Speaker "attacked" him and resorted to "personal disparagement" to his question.

Perhaps she wasn't ready for a question from the press who wasn't a leftist shill for the DNC.

Twitter was abuzz with responses to Pelosi's angst. One person tweeted:
"Knee-jerk reaction Alinsky RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
Another posted:
"I watched as it happened today and had to pick my jaw up off the floor. She was way out of line. There was nothing at all wrong with your question or how you asked."
And another:
"She not used to having real journalist ask her questions."
If you noticed, Pelosi never answered Rosen's question.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.




MO man from Bosnia gets 8-year prison term for aiding ISIS


Ramiz Zijad Hodzic, 45, came to the U.S. from Bosnia to pursue the Islamic dream of a world caliphate. But the Missouri man was sentenced on Thursday to eight years in prison for supporting terrorists, including an ISIS leader in Syria.

Hodzic backed Bosnian-American Abdullah Ramo Pazara, a terrorist who left Missouri for Syria in 2013 and was sent "packing for paradise" when he was killed fighting for ISIS.

Hodzic of St. Louis County, pleaded guilty last spring of providing material support to ISIS terrorists, authorities said. He sent cash and military equipment to several Middle East countries from 2013 to 2015 in order to help ISIS in their efforts to murder kafirs.

The terrorist supporter's attorney asked for a lighter sentence, claiming Hodzic mostly sent Pazara supplies like socks and that he loved the United States, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.

Three of Hodzic’s co-defendants have already been sentenced, but his lovely terrorist-supporting wife and another defendant who pleaded not guilty await sentencing.

Hodzic will be deported to some s**hole country after his prison term, authorities said.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.




Friday, November 15, 2019

Crying Yovanovitch to put on her 'big girl' pants and testify

The President of the United States has the authority to terminate the employment of anyone he appoints as well as foreign ambassadors who may have been appointed by him or a previous administration. In fact, it's not uncommon for a new administration to put in their own people when taking office.

Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, is such a person. Appointed by the Obama administration, Trump felt that it was time for her to go, insofar as he was concerned. He has every right to replace her with someone he prefers.

But in spite of it being commonplace, Yovanovitch cried when she was fired this past May, tearing up as she spoke of her sudden firing during a closed-door deposition in October, according to sources telling Fox News.

The 60-year-old Yovanovich appeared on Friday morning at 9 a.m. ET,  for Day Two of the public impeachment hearings against President Trump.

Trump had previously described Yovanovich to Ukrainian President Zelensky in the July 25th phone call as "bad news," according to the Washington Post. He also said in the imprecise way he is known for, "[S]he's going to go through some things." What Trump meant by that is anyone's guess.

As the hearing is going on as this is being posted, we shall see what kind of bad news Yovanovich will turn out to be. One thing is clear, she did not hear the phone call that generated this latest impeachment attempt, nor was she the Ukraine ambassador when the call took place.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.




Thursday, November 14, 2019

"Bernie and Comatose sitting in a tree"


If by some crazy chance, some improbable, whacky, US-gone-to-hell-in-a-handbasket horrible chance, Communist Senator Bernie Sanders becomes the next president of the United States, he promises that fellow Commie Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-NY) would play a key role in his White House.

Now by key role in the White House it's possible Sanders meant that she would be serving drinks at parties with his administration, that would make perfect sense. If, on the other hand, he would have AOC as his economic advisor, that would be the end of the country as we know it. 

Sanders (Idiot-VT via Brooklyn) told ABC News on Monday that his campaign sidekick, 'Sandy from the Bronx,' "Wood be very impawtent to my admischtrashun."

In terms of specifics, Sanders was non-committal, but said that Ocasio-Cortez would have a significant role in shaping both domestic and foreign policy in a Sanders administration.

“Look, I’ve said this before, let me say it again," the geriatric Sanders said in his thick, silly-sounding Brooklyn accent, "and I don’t want you to hear this because your head will explode,” Sanders claimed in the joint interview with the Communist freshman New York congresswoman. “I don’t know of any person who, in the cawse of less than one year, has had more of an impact on American politics as a freshman member of Congress than she has,” he said in reference to her Green New Deal, a proposal that received not one vote from either party and calls for the killing of farting cows, upgrading every building in the country, and secretly plans for the complete government takeover of all businesses.

“It’s not only that she has focus on the real issues impacting the American people, like climate change, the usury rates that Wall Street are charging working people in this country, but she has been an inspiration to working people all across this country and to young people in particular,” Sanders gushed.

“I happen to believe that the future of this country depends on young people becoming increasingly involved in the political process and there’s nobody I know that can do a bettah job inspiring young people than Alexandria,” he continued.

“If I’m in the White House, she will play a very, very, very, very impawtint role. No question. One way or another, absolutely, positively, indubitably yeah, sure, sure . . . pass the pudding.” Sanders concluded, acknowledging that her role could be a “Cabinet-level” position or White House bartender.

AOC was among the first of the Congressional progressives to endorse Sanders, and has since brought fellow anti-Semitic “squad” members, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), along for the wild and tumultuous ride. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), the hanger-on of the squad and fourth member bucked the Bernie trend with a more logical endorsement, throwing her support behind Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Oh, and don't be fooled about the anti-Semitism comment--Bernie is as Jewish as the Ayatollah is Catholic, and he is clearly anti-Israel, which makes him cool in the eyes of the "squad."

Sanders has clearly reaped benefits from AOC’s support, commanding more headlines and drawing more supporters to his events because people love a great freak show.

Sanders' campaign re-launch came a little over a week before he suffered a mild heart attack. Bets are being taken as to whether he will live long enough to see President Trump finish out his second term.


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.



Tuesday, November 12, 2019

U.S. warns E.U. against "warning labels" for Jewish-made products

Leading U.S. lawmakers are warning the European Union that if they issue a mandate requiring Jewish products made in areas of Israel that are contested to carry consumer warning labels, this could trigger American anti-boycott laws and effectively jeopardize our trade with Europe, where anti-Semitism is becoming increasingly more overt.

The European Court of Justice (CJEU), a veritable oxymoron to the tune of 'jumbo shrimp', is expected to issue an opinion this week on a long-running case brought forth by an Israeli winery challenging a requirement that Israeli-made products be labeled as coming from "settlements" and "Israeli colonies."

The decision, according to the Washington Free Beacon, is expected to be issued early Tuesday and follows a recent opinion by the EU court's advocate general stipulating that European law requires these Jewish-made products to be labeled. Critics said the law is reminiscent of Nazi-era boycotts of Jewish products and have viewed such requirements as a win for the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, or BDS. 

Question: If the EU wants to boycott Israeli products, why aren't they also boycotting Turkish, Venezuelan, Iranian and Jordanian products, just for starters?

Answer: Because the BDS movement is an anti-Semitic, Palestinian-led movement co-founded by Omar Baghouti, a man who has  called for a one state solution and the dismantling of Israel, the only Jewish state on the planet. 

Barghouti attended Tel Aviv University but was overtly anti-Semitic. The school wanted to throw him out but it never happened and he ended up receiving a masters degree in philosophy.

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) petitioned EU ambassador to the United States Stavros Lambrinidis to raise concerns about a possible ruling in favor of the warning labels. The Senator said that if the mandate succeeded, it could create policy tension with the United States.

Rep. Juan Vargas (D-CA) sent a letter to U.S. ambassador to the E.U., Gordon Sondland warning that the ruling would lead to discrimination against Israel, but of course, that's exactly the intention.

Sens. Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) and Rob Portman (R-OH) sent a similar letter to U.S. trade representative Robert Lighthizer expressing concerns that the ruling holds Israel to a standard no other country is subjected to, as mentioned above.

The lawmakers also said such a ruling could trigger multiple U.S. anti-boycott laws and damage the nearly $1.3 trillion in trade between America and the E.U.

"The regulation in question is problematic for a number of reasons, including because it targets specific businesses based on the ethnicity and national origin of their owners," Menendez wrote in the letter he sent to Lambrinidis.

"I am deeply concerned that if the CJEU decision empowers the EU to require or allow its Member States to label Israeli and Palestinian products in the manner proposed, it will allow and encourage the politicization of EU rules of origin labeling with potential adverse unintended consequences, including by opening the door to near-unlimited use of ‘ethical considerations' in food labeling which would enable Member State protectionism and nationalism, and be unhelpful for the EU single market," Menendez wrote.

"Additionally, it could facilitate Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) tactics and de facto boycotts and discrimination against Israel, and its products, and potentially lead to discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, religion and nationality, contrary to existing EU policies and laws against BDS campaigns, Israel boycotts and discrimination," the letter states.

A decision mandating the labeling of Jewish goods also would be seen as an effort by the E.U. to interfere in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

"The U.S. Federal Government and many U.S. states have enacted strong anti-boycott provisions that impose severe penalties and restrictions on companies that participate in boycotts or other economic pressure campaigns against Israel," Menendez wrote. "If the CJEU decision empowers the EU to mandate or allow Member States to implement such labels which target Israeli businesses and exports there will be serious and far-reaching implications and unintended consequences."

So we will find out soon enough about the decision the EU is expected to make, but with the endemic problem of hatred for the Jews, don't bet on a good outcome.



Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.





Gaza Islamists fire rockets into Israel after a jihadi leader is killed

Baha Abu el-Atta will no longer be scheming to kill Israelis now that he has joined his fellow martyrs eternally cavorting with their assigned virgins in Jannah after the Israeli Air Force blew him to smithereens along with his wife.

In response to the justice served, jihadis in Gaza fired over 100 rockets into the town of Sderot Tuesday morning. The militants vowed further revenge, as if they needed an excuse to kill Jews.

“The response to this crime will have no limits,” Islamic Jihad said in a statement.

Of course, it was no crime to impose the death penalty on the person who has been responsible for imposing the death penalty on people living in Israel while being Jewish.

The airstrike killed el-Atta and his wife in their home in eastern Gaza, according to Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an Israeli military spokesman. He referred to the the jihadi as a "ticking time bomb" who was responsible for the many rocket attacks on southern Israel. 

Conricus said el-Atta was planning new attacks. "We essentially, over the last week, have been waiting for the opportune moment to conduct this surgical strike," he said. 
Conricus explained that the airstrike only destroyed the one floor of the building in which el-Atta called home, in order to minimize "collateral damage."  The building is in the eastern part of Gaza City. to minimize "collateral damage."

In mere minutes after the Palestinian terrorists confirmed el-Atta's death, they indiscriminately fired a multitude of rockets at Israel, hoping to create "collateral damage" rather than avoiding it, sparking air raid sirens in the morning as far as Tel Aviv.

At least 100 rockets were fired at Israel and of these, about 60 were intercepted by the Iron Dome system. Fortunately, there were no Israeli casualties.

Schools were closed and citizens were asked to remain at home in those communities from the Gaza border all the way to Tel Aviv, almost 60 miles away. 

At least two people were injured from the rockets, including an 8-year-old girl who is in critical condition while running to a bomb shelter, reports The Wall Street Journal.

Conricus said that Israel has no future plans to assassinate jihadi leaders, but said of el-Atta, "There was no other choice."

By mid-morning, the IDF said it made a direct hit of two Islamic jihad militants from a rocket-launching unit. The Gaza Health Ministry said a Palestinian man was killed and another wounded in the strike.

One of the rockets from Gaza hit a residential house in Netivot in southern Israel, penetrating the roof of the home, but nobody was hurt, the IDF said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has issued a series of warnings recently about alleged Iranian aggression, while he has also been criticized by Israelis along the southern border to soft responses to recent terrorist attacks. However, his Security Cabinet was holding an emergency meeting to discuss further action which hopefully will be more forceful.

But even Netanyahu's political rival, Benny Gantz, said the airstrike was "the right decision."

A successful military operation could politically strengthen Netanyahu as he seeks to hold onto power — especially if he is indicted on corruption charges.

Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.   You can also see my other blog on the Times of Israel.





Ilhan Omar slipped another $150K to her alleged paramour's consulting firm

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) paid an additional $150,000 to Tim Mynett's political consulting firm a mere 3 months after it was revealed by...