Posts
When three Palestinian-American college students were shot on November 25, of last year, the incident was painted as an "anti-Palestinian hate crime. Birdcage liner New York Times and other major news outlets had the public believing that lie, but as it turned out the shooter was pro-Hamas, making him a bloody Hamasshole and the leftist media anti-American information purveyors.
Whenever the meteoric rise in anti-Semitism was pointed out, Palestinian-Hamas advocates point to this Vermont shooting as proof that Arabs and Muslims are just as much victims as those, you know, Jews.
But it wasn't true.
It got to the point where some schools said they would form a committee to investigate anti-Semitism, and also investigate Islamophobia. Harvard naturally jumped on the bandwagon along with other prestigious universities. Even the Biden administration, announced its U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism immediately followed up with an announcement that it's also preparing a national strategy to counter Islamophobia, because you see how often bands of marauders go out into the night and attack Muslims.
But it turns out that Exhibit A of “anti-Palestinian hate” was just smoke and mirrors.
By December, local Vermont media reported that the alleged shooter's social media accounts showed pro-Hamas rhetoric.
Of course, the mainstream media ignored this news until now. In the March 3 edition of the New York Times Magazine, an essay by Rozina Ali, formerly a Cairo-based journalist who is writing a book about "the recent history of Islamophobia in the United States," ad is also an adjunct teacher at New York University, wrote about why we should be sympathetic for the three 20-year-old male victims.
Buried in the 41 paragraph article, in paragraph 30, Ali took a sudden change in direction. “Hate crimes are challenging to prove in court,” she wrote. "What made this case even more tricky was that the alleged shooter, Jason Eaton, said nothing out loud before, during or after the shooting.” There were no shouts of "death to Muslims," or "this is MAGA country," for example.
So it is obviously difficult to know whether this was a hate crime due to lack of evidence, even with the attacker's social media accounts.
But in this case, according to author Rozina Ali, it was the exact opposite.
With regard to the Oct. 7 pogrom perpetrated by Hamas in southern Israel that killed 1,200 men, women and children, here’s what the “anti-Palestinian” Eaton wrote on X on Nov. 16: “What if someone occupied your country? Wouldn’t you fight them?” [Hint: Easton might have been defending Hamas' October 7, massacre of Israelis.]
Ali only quoted on of Eaton's posts but on Oct, 17, a post that was quoted by by Seven Days, a Vermont-based news agency, on Dec. 6: “The notion that Hamas is ‘evil’ for defending their state from occupation is absurd. They are owed a state. Pay up.”
So Eaton clearly is defending what Hamas did on that Sabbath day in October, destroying the left's narrative that the shooting was Islamophobia. This explains why he wasn't charged with a hate crime since his social media shows he supports, not hates Palestinians.
Ali and others have reported that Eaton has a long history of personal problems. That would seem to be what was behind this crazy shooting, but that doesn't fit the narrative that Hamasshole advocates push forward. However, the truth was only exposed at first by the Vermont press so the left kept pushing the "anti-Palestine hate" because they believed nobody would know the true story.
But now the word is out and even the New York Times had to admit that Eaton is a cretin.
Anti-Semitism is at an all-time high just a day after the October 7th blood bath of Israelis, once the public got over the initial horrors of Israeli children and adults being burned alive, mutilated, raped, beheaded and otherwise murdered.
By October 8, it was okay for closet anti-Semites to once again show their true colors when it came to, you know, the Jews. Somehow the world forgot what Hamas and other terrorist groups had done that day, and blamed the victims of their deranged massacre in order to justify their own hatred of one of the most successful and productive groups of individuals in the Middle East.
And when Israel began to successfully beat back Hamas and take control in the war, the West hated Israel for that. It's only when Jews are being mercilessly slaughtered that the West feels brief sympathy for the Jews.
Now Palestinians are using that fact to try pumping the public for sympathy. They show dead babies [sometimes the babies are fake and made of rubber] but they forget to say that the babies and others were used by Hamas as human shields for propaganda purposes and for some protection because they know Israel will not fire at them when they hide behind children and innocent adults when they see it happening.
Hamas is responsible for every single dead Palestinian. Every last one. And the West refuses to open their eyes.
Last November, an Ohio Muslim named Hesham Ayyad tried to perpetrate a jihadi hoax. He claimed a driver yelled “Kill all Palestinians!” and “Long live Israel!” at him and then ran him over. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and similar groups yelled “Hate crime!” It would have made Jussie Smollett proud, but security footage showed Ayyad and his brother in a street corner fistfight, which caused his injuries.
Surprisingly, Ayyad has been charged with lying about the incident, but CAIR still won’t admit that it was a hoax because CAIR is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. And there's no doubt they will fail to acknowledge the Vermont shooting as a media hoax.
Jason Eaton is pro-Hamas and his posts show it beyond a doubt. Reasonable people should be able to see the truth while extremists always believe feelings over facts and reality. Eaton's shooting of those men had nothing to do with anti-Muslim sentiments.
He is just another damn criminal much like those in the media who commit fraud when they refuse to write the truth when they know it. Sadly, they do this with impunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment