Not Gov. Stacey Abrams hints she'd keep Kemp's tax cuts as actual governor of GA

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, kind of hinted that if she really gets elected as Georgia's governor, she would do what Gov. Brian Kemp (R) has done, which is to keep the current tax cuts which saves Georgia's residents $1billion.

[H/T Fox News]

But like most Democrats, if you believe their campaign promises, you might also believe that your cat won't eat you after you die. Consider Biden's broken promises and ask yourself if Abrams will "pull a Joe" on you.

The Kemp campaign and Republican Governors Association blasted Abrams on Wednesday, just 50 days after Gov. Kemp signed "the largest income tax cut in state history." She has been totally "silent" on the tax cuts because they constantly accuse the GOP as the party that wants to raise taxes. It's as if the Democrats don't know what the TEA Party stood for [taxed enough already] while they think voters are stupid.

The Abrams campaign told Fox News, "Stacey has made clear she will not raise any taxes, she has clearly laid out how she will pay for her plans, and none of her plans to date or in the future will raise taxes."

This means that she will raise taxes.

When asked specifically if Abrams will commit to maintaining the tax cuts that were passed, a spokesperson replied, "Yes."

This  means "no."

She also turned the tables on Team Kemp, pointing to the governor's suspension of the Peach State's gas tax he signed into law in May, which expires mid-July.

Abrams is calling for the suspension to extend until the end of the year, after the election, that is. 

Maybe Kemp will extend the suspension, but it's hard to believe anything Abrams says--she still insists she won the 2018 gubernatorial election, which she lost by over 50,000 votes.

"Before saying another word on taxes, Kemp should follow Stacey Abrams’ lead by supporting an extension of the gas tax suspension until the end of 2022," the Abrams campaign told Fox News. "Instead, he has indicated he will restore gas taxes to full levels next month, raising gas taxes and gas prices."

Believe the Abrams campaign at your own risk, Georgia. At least Kemp's campaign told the network that the governor will "continue to evaluate a further suspension of the gas tax" and will "make the decision soon in consultation with legislative leadership," noting that it amounts to "$170 million" saved per month.

The Kemp campaign also pushed back on Abrams' assertion that she wouldn't raise any taxes. The campaign told the outlet that "Abrams is rolling out plans to spend billions of taxpayer money and isn’t being honest about how she’d pay for it."

"Like the liberals she’s beholden to in the Biden Administration, Abrams is using fuzzy math and praying no one notices," Kemp campaign deputy communications director Reagan McCarthy said. "Hardworking Georgians struggling to make ends meet thanks to Democrat policies deserve a straight answer from her on how much their taxes will go up to pay for her campaign ‘promises.’"

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Although former President Trump did not endorse Kemp, instead endorsing David Perdue, in an attempt to unseat Kemp because he certified Georgia's election results, the governor kicked Perdue's butt in the election. He won an incredible 73.7% of the Republican vote. To his credit, Perdue conceded the election and offered his support for Kemp. Whether or not Trump will forgive and forget before November, is anyone's guess, but I guess not. As much as I like what Trump accomplished in his 4 years as president, his ego is fragile and it's hard to get back on his good side.

I hope I'm wrong.

The latest polls show Kemp having a five-point lead over Abrams, according to the average from RealClearPolitics. Why anyone would vote for Abrams is a mystery.

Tweet

Aunty Maxine refuses to blame Trump for surging economy

Rep. Maxine Waters (Dummy--Calif.) claims that President Trump deserves no credit for the surging economy. 

This statement is coming from the free-range dementia patient who, in 2011, said on Meet the Press that the United States needed to spend a trillion dollars more on a jobs program.

"The president must be bold," she told David Gregory. "I agree that he [Obama] must have a jobs program, he must create jobs. I'm talking about a jobs program of a trillion dollars or more. We've got to put Americans to work. That's the only way to revitalize this economy. When people work, they earn money [she's just so profound], they spend that money, and that's what gets the economy up and going."

Waters. who gave former President Obama an "A" grade for his first 100 days in office,  but on The View, despite a record-high stock market, low levels of unemployment and fantastic economic reports, had nothing good to say about Trump's performance.

The host Jedediah Bila asked Waters the question: "Are you willing to give him [Trump] some credit in that arena, on the economy, that he's making some progress?"

The senile dementia sufferer responded, "Absolutely not." She added, "I think," she lied, "too much credit is given to presidents about how the markets are working, and I really don't think," (which is true) "that he's done anything that he can take credit for."

The truth is, there is nothing President Trump can do, nothing, that the left will give him credit for, and the media and Maxine Waters with her one working brain cell, show that every day.

Waters is possibly suffering from senile dementia, as I implied above. She has made gaffes that make Joe Biden sound like Winston Churchill. "I was a millennial once," she said in a speech.

The congresswoman advised young leftists to "stay woke," using a political phrase made popular by neo-Marxist racial agitators to convey awareness of invisible forces such as "systemic [and] institutionalized racism."

When the health care bill was signed in April 2010, she denounced flag-waving at a Tea Party rally. "I was amazed; I really was. I didn't say anything to anybody. I just watched--the Republicans were out there--they were having a great time. They were laughing, they were waving the American flag, they were egging them on, and I thought that was outrageous behavior; I really did."

And before the health care bill episode where she showed her true patriotic colors, she was lecturing oil company executives in 2008. It seems that Aunty Maxine can't hide her socialist ideology: "Guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal would be about socializing . . . ummm . . . would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies."

Now let's take a ride in the "Way-back Machine" to 1993. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times Waters said:

"Policy, for the most part, has been made by white people in America, not by people of color. And they have tended to take care of those things that they think are important. Whether it's their agricultural subsidies, or other kinds of expenditures that are certainly not expenditures for poor people or for people of color. And so we have to band together and keep fighting back."

During the Rodney King riots in her own congressional district, Waters excused the violence, while her constituents burned building after building. The Los Angeles Times quoted her saying: "If you call it a riot, it sounds like it was just a bunch of crazy people who went out and did bad things for no reason. I maintain it was somewhat understandable, if not acceptable. So I call it a rebellion."

By now it should be apparent that Maxine Waters is a socialist who sees conservatives as white people of privilege or worse. There is nothing a Republican can do that will ever sit well with her. 

Liberals who decried harsh conservative attacks on then-President Obama, need to remember how in 2005, Waters said of then-President Bush and Vice President Cheney: "The President is a liar. Dick Cheney, the chief architect of the Big Lie, is not only a liar; he is a thief."

If Waters was not so toxic, she'd be comical.


Tweet

Lerner learned from Hillary

It looks like Lois Lerner, the IRS official investigated for Tea Party targeting scandal, attended the Hillary Clinton School of Internet Insecurity. Now the IRS admitted in federal court that Lois had a second email account.

The name Lerner used on this covert account was "Toby Miles," the same name as her pooch. Why she chose a handle belonging to a mongrel is anyone's guess.

Nostril-flaunting Lerner

The IRS admission was first reported by The Washington Times on Monday in an open-records lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, who is currently suing to see pretty little Miss Lerner's emails that were sent during her targeting of conservative groups for further IRS scrutiny. The targeting goes way above and beyond how the IRS scrutinizes liberal groups.

Geoffrey Klimas, an attorney representing the IRS, told the court that another email account in addition to her official government account, was discovered as they prepared for the hearing.

"In the process of preparing this status report and for the August 24, 2015 release of Lerner communications, the undersigned attorneys learned that, in addition to emails to or from and email account denominated 'Lois G. Lerner' or 'Lois Home,' some emails responsive to Judicial Watch's request may have been sent to or received from a personal email account denominated 'Toby Miles,'" Klimas said.

Toby is the dog, Miles is her husband's last name.

The IRS concluded that the account was a personal one used by Lois Lerner, who, like Hillary, seems to never learn. They are reviewing previous releases to Judicial Watch and will provide an update in a few days to conclude if any new searches need to be done or any documents need to be re-released with different redactions.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch said that "This is the latest in a parade of obstruction from the IRS and the Department of Justice on these issues." And like the Hillary Clinton cluster fart, he pointed out to Fox News how putting sensitive government information on a non-government account was "disturbing."

Fitton explained that a special counsel should be appointed in this case as both the IRS and DoJ knew about the Toby Miles account for some time.

Fitton then added that "the IRS scandal is not over."

Neither are the Hillary Clinton scandals.


Tweet

Contempt for Lois Lerner to be Decided

Lois Lerner  testified on her own behalf again this past March. Now a House committee will meet next week to determine whether she should be held in contempt of Congress. You see, you can't say that you're innocent of the charges brought against you (in this case, the charges were targeting the Tea Party and conservative organizations) and then refuse to answer questions to question that claim. In other words, you can't testify and then say you refuse to testify.

Hey, I'm a Liberal: Fool Me 87 Times, Shame on Me

Another Obamacare delay, but Kathleen Sebelius says it isn't a delay and like a bunch of Democrats swore, there would be no more delays. So of course they delayed the mandatory sign-up to mid-April. So Sebelius et al, lied to the American public about the fact that there were to be no more delays.

People will save, on average, about $2500 a year under Obamacare, our illustrious president said. The complete opposite is true, and in many cases people will spend thousands more to get coverage, and the deductibles are astronomical in many cases. This was a lie to the American public and still, nothing has been done about it.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, period; but the truth is only if he or she takes your new coverage. That did not work out well for tens of thousands of people. A lie, if there ever was a lie.

If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan; period. Tell that to the tens of thousands who lost their healthcare plan.

We were told that Benghazi was a spontaneous attack spurred on by an anti-Muhammad (peas be up in him) video. Hillary said this, Obama said this, Susan Rice said this, and others tried to say this but were unable to speak due to the location of their heads in respect to their butts. Big liars all.

Fast and Furious, where Eric Holder of the DoJ allowed weapons to be brought into Mexico, where straw buyers got them into the hands of drug cartels. Some ended up killing Agent Brian Terry, but Eric Holder said he was unaware of the scheme. I have no doubt that Holder ordered the scheme, and unfortunately no proof, that he's lying.

Lois Lerner and people high up in the Democratic food chain in the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups and groups with the word "patriot" in their title. Obviously, this shows that people like Lerner, and those Democrats she schemed with, do not like patriots and thereby do not like patriotism, and our nation, one might surmise. At least not our nation as it has stood for two plus centuries (and not the 400 years of Constitutional law that Sheila Jackson-Lee believed).

Harry Reid (D-UT) allegedly gave $1500 in campaign money to his granddaughter, which he denies. While trying to make this scandal go away, he is accusing the GOP of being the reason Putin took Crimea. I believe Reid should be made to apologize to the GOP for the slandering he tried to give them, and he should be made to release all documents regarding his granddaughter's contributions. Then I believe he needs to write 1000 times "I am a girly-man with a girly-man's voice."

Obama warned Syria that if they crossed his "red line" there would be terrible consequences to pay. They crossed for free. What a lie.

Obama warned America that the IRS scandal, when it originally made the news, was totally unacceptable and he was going to get to the bottom of it. He also pledged to get to the bottom of the Fast and Furious crime. In all cases, there was no bottom to get to.

I could go on and on and on, but you get the idea. Liberals lie all the time. When they say, "Hello," they're lying. 

How many times does a liberal have to get lied to before becoming aware they are lies? The answer is simple--there is no number of times because the liberal couldn't tell a lie from the definition of what 'sex' is, and what 'is', is.

Tweet

Sebelius Strong Arming

As you know, the Obamacare roll-out has been as successful as Solyndra and getting answers about Benghazi. Obama's minions are under the gun and this is especially true for Kathleen Sebelius, the figurehead of HHS, or as it's laughingly called, Health and Human Services.

Sebelius is refusing to answer the question as to whether or not she's still going around to companies with her hand out to support this chameleon law, a law that has been "tweaked" (as opposed to twerked) over 30 times. Of course, this is unconstitutional, but the Constitution is an old document, according to Obama and many leftists of late.

The problem is serious. The HHS is the regulator of Johnson & Johnson, a company held by the Robert Wood Johnson company. Sebelius is going to this company asking them for money--a company she can make trouble for via an HHS audit--and it places them in a peculiar situation. Worse, it's illegal for Sebelius to do it in the first place because it's an obvious conflict of interest. It isn't like other instruments of government have tried to make trouble for conservative groups, right? Oh wait, I forgot about the IRS and what they are doing with the Tea Party organizations applying for 501(c) 3 status; after years, they're still waiting while all of the Democratic affiliated organizations got their status. 

But I digress.

We all know Obamacare is a mess; Sebelius has a big load on her plate (picture what I'm saying here) and now she even has to defend why Obamacare enrollees have no avenue of appeal regarding unfavorable health care determinations. Maybe the administration will say "It only impacts a very small portion of the huge population enrolled in the program," implying that 22,000 people don't count all that much, but it also shows a lack of clarity in the planning of this "law." 

I watch Fox News and I hear a lot of Republicans complaining. That seems to be our national sport. What are we going to do about it, our lawmakers, that is? It's time to do something about this lawless president but congress needs to act.

Tweet

Double Standards of the Left

Tim Donnelly is running for governor of California. He is a member of the Tea Party. Former Miss Venezuela, Maria Conchita Alonso, is endorsing him and has appeared in a TV ad to do just that. Ms. Alonso gained fame for such Hollywood hits like "Moscow on the Hudson," and "The Running Man."

Ms. Alonso worked for a San Francisco arts organization and was to star in its rendition of the "Vagina Monologues," which I have not seen, but I suspect differs significantly from the Readers Digest series, "I Am Joe's Heart (Lungs, Kidneys, Eyes, and so on). Eliana Lopez, the producer of the "Vagina Monologues" spoke to KPIX 5 explaining that Ms. Alonso will no longer be appearing in the play. Ms. Lopez said, "Of course she has the right to say whatever she wants. But we're in the middle of the Mission. Doing what she is doing is against what we believe." Several Latino organizations have also criticized Ms. Alonso for the endorsement.

To be fair, in the ad, Ms. Alonso "translates" Mr. Donnelly's remarks with a few slightly off-color Spanish expressions, but let's face it, if Donnelly was a liberal instead of a Tea Party conservative, there would be no story, and Maria Conchita Alonso would be lauded by the left.

Obamalinsky

Barack Hussein Obama is clearly not the best president we’ve ever had; so far he’s our worst. But when all is said and done, you have to give him credit for his ability to implement Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals.

I like to think that Obama relies most heavily upon Rule Number Five. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” In spite of the fact that he said he will bring the country together, he has cleaved us so much that it would make Dolly Parton envious. You can’t defend against ridicule; it isn’t usually rational. It creates anger, and it’s damn mean. You can hear in his talking points how crazy the tea party is, for example, or how the GOP is a bunch of racists who want nothing more than to see Obama fail. There’s probably nothing worse than a person who is not a racist to be called a racist.

The word most favored by liberals seems to be the word “racist.” Idiots like Chris Matthews use it almost as much as Obama uses the word “uh.” But you have to wonder how many non-– whites Matthews associates with – – my guess is that he associates with his many non—whites as attended his son’s wedding. None.

The problem as I see it is that conservatives need to be more aggressive when responding to liberal lies. Perhaps we need to use Alinsky’s Rules to wage mental war. Maybe we need to use Rule 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” That is, isolate the target from sympathy. Go after specific people like Obama, Biden, and Hillary, and not the Democrats as a whole. Alinsky acknowledges that this is cruel but effective. He believes that direct personalized criticism and ridicule works.

I know that I called Chris Matthews and idiot, but I should warn you that ad hominem attacks tend to be the weakest. Of course, they are the easiest to use by liberals because there are no facts to support their wild claims. If liberals actually used facts they would be Republicans.

So if you don't mind a president whose greatest skill is that of a community organizer and his greatest love seems to be for socialism and radical change within the government, you probably don't mind with happening with Obamacare, nor the fact that our president has been meeting with Muslim Brotherhood members in the People's House. I know Chris Matthews doesn't mind – – he still gets a thrill up his leg. But I suspect that the thrill is in going as far up as it used to.

Tweet

Liberal Logic

Isn't it interesting how the Democrats are against probing deeper into the IRS scandals while the GOP is champing at the bit to do just that? First they claim that liberal or progressive groups were treated the same as tea party and other conservative groups--that is, they were also targeted by the IRS. And somehow, if this were true that would make it okay with them. So, as long as the IRS unfairly targets Americans, as long as it doesn't discriminate any particular group of American, it's okay.

Liberal logic.

8 Questions That Aren't Funny

Juan Williams  of Fox News says the terrorists who bombed the Boston Marathon were not tied into any radical organization. Thus, we can view them in terms of "radical Islam." Obviously, Williams isn't counting Islam as a radical organization--the largest radical organization on earth--nor sees how the Koran, their marching orders, to be radical in what is written therein. .

Some of the thoughts I had about this bombing might sound offensive because they are ironic, which might be mistaken as humor, but I only mean the following to be sarcastic.

1. When Islam wins a battle, they often build triumphal mosques at the site where the battle was waged and won by them. Will the Muslim world now consider building a triumphal mosque on Boylston Street like they wanted to do at the Twin Towers sight? All they need to do is wait a few years until the heat is off them and Americans forget what it felt like on April 15th, when 3 innocent race spectators were killed and over 160 were maimed and otherwise injured severely.

2. In light of the Fort Hood shootings in 2009, where 13 people were killed by Nidal Hasan while shouting "Allahu Akbar," meaning, "My god is greatest," and President Obama had this incident labeled "Workplace violence," will he soon declare the Islamic terrorist attack to be "Sports place violence," and the injuries suffered, "Sports injuries?"

3. Since the latest terrorist attack happened in Boston, will the liberals blame it all on the Tea Party? While liberals consider cutting down a tree as terrorism, the English considered the Boston Tea Party an act of terrorism.

4. Will our talking about the Boston Marathon terrorist attack in terms of Islamic terrorism, will CAIR insist that we are merely being "Islamophobic" as if this is an actual phobia rather than a fear that is totally rational? 

5. Female DNA was found on pieces of the bomb. Does this mean that the pressure cooker that was the container for the bomb, once belonged to a female who used it for making basmati rice, sambar, or some other Indian food? Could it have belonged to a sales clerk?

6. Will terrorist #2 (I refuse to use his name) beat the death penalty, get out of prison after a decade or so, and write a book which will become a movie and make him rich? Will part of the movie earnings go to the Muslim Brotherhood and eventually come back to bite us? Will the movie be a Michael Moore documentary?

7. Will terrorist #2 be forced to repay the SNAP benefits he and his family were given if he, in fact, becomes wealthy from the movie about his life? Will Barack Hussein Obama play himself in the movie?

The people who were killed by these jihadist scum-bags will never get their loved ones back. The people who lost limbs, vision or hearing, will never be the same for the remainder of their lives. I hope we never forget and that we change our policies on Islamic terrorism and immigration. I am angry at how we've been doing business in the USA under Obama. Our enemies see us as impotent, weak, and all bark with no bite. Obama believes the FBI did all it could do, in spite of the Russian information they gave us about the terrorists, but "this is hard stuff," he added.

Sadly, I believe that terrorist #2 will not get the death penalty and will give us no real information in the war against jihad. (I don't call it the war against terror because it's pointless to have a war against a tactic rather than an enemy.) The terrorist, will have the very high profile lawyer, Judy Clark, to defend him and try to keep him from getting the death penalty. You and I will pay for her services, just as we did for the terrorist's family's welfare.

8. Finally, will we learn the truth about Benghazi before the movie on terrorist #2 is released? Obama promised to punish those involved, but Obama makes a lot of empty promises and I'm not holding my breath.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Robin Hood Would Have Led the Tea Party

In today's out of control economy, it seems acceptable for government to take from those who have and give it to those who have not. While I'm not being original in how I label this, I like to call this notion the Robin Hood Syndrome.  I believe much of the American public has come to accept this as moral and ethical behavior.

The Free Online Dictionary defines syndrome as: 1. A group of symptoms that collectively indicate or characterize a disease, psychological disorder, or other abnormal condition. 2. a) A complex of symptoms indicating the existence of an undesirable condition or quality; b) A distinctive characteristic or pattern of behavior.

Robin Hood, you may remember, lived in the Sherwood Forest and his arch nemesis was the Sheriff of Nottingham. The Sheriff, with his greasy, twisted moustache, symbolized the government, and the poor people, who were hard working peons,  had to pay taxes to him. In an interesting article by John A. Wilkins (Nov. 4, 2009) entitled: Taxing the Rich to Help the Poor--The Morality of the Robin Hood Syndrome, the author discusses the problem with this kind of thinking. He cites an IRS study (2004) showing that the top 25% of wage earners paid 85% of the taxes while the bottom 50% paid a mere 3%. 

But Obama casts the rich "those millionaires and billionaires with their corporate jets and private jets," (you've heard the talking points), as the "haves," and thus, they must pay "their fair share." Does Robin Hood begin to sound relevant to this discussion?

Yet it was Robin Hood who was taking from the government coffers, and redistributing it to the workers. In other words, Robin was taking the tax money back and returning it to the people--not the other way around. 

The moral lesson here is this: money gives people power and with power comes jealousy and victimization. Those with money are seen as evil and selfish, and are therefore worthy of contempt just for being rich, whether the money was inherited or earned through hard work--and this is how Obama has portrayed those "One Percenters." 

I have no doubt that if Robin Hood were a real person, he would be a proud member of the Tea Party. Not just another guy in tights.

Tweet

Tea For Free

What the Tea Party Looks Like

What Occupy Wall St. Looks Like

When the Tea Party demonstrated in Richmond, Virginia, they had to pay the city for the right to do so, and they did. But when the OWSers demonstrated, and continue to demonstrate, they paid nothing. Now the Tea Party wants their money back and hell, I don't blame them. What audacity (what an overused word) of the left to even compare the two groups, but to treat them with disparity, favoring the hygiene impaired losers who left mommy's basement to make a stand for socialism, is unfair and unAmerican. 

OWS Mascot

The truth is that it costs cities money when a group of people protest, and while it makes sense to charge for the protest, in order to pay the police and departments of sanitation for these cities, it seems only fair to charge the OWS protestors the same proportional amount in respect to the amount of time protesting that the Tea Party paid. Who do we send the bill to? I'd go with George Soros or any of the unions supporting this mob. I would definitely not want a government agency paying for the protestors because that would merely come from our own tax dollars, and those of us who pay taxes are not represented by OWSers. Remember, the insignia of the Tea Party is the American flag; the insignia of OWS is crossed turds.




Tweet

Occupy Wall Street Smells Fishy

Honk if someone else caused your debt

Nancy Pelosi continues to compare the unwashed mobs of Occupy Wall Street and other cities of our country to the Tea Party. So let's look at the differences and similarities, if they exist, and you decide if they're similar.

Tea Party rallies broke no laws and did no damage to the scenes where they gather. Occupy Wall Street has stolen from local merchants, ruined washrooms, and are in the process of making a mess of the sidewalks of the cities where they are camping out.
Tea Party has a clear message--limit the size of government, reduce spending, and get rid of wasteful entitlements
Occupy Wall Street has confused messages that are incoherent at best. They want their own debts, like college loans, to be forgiven. They want to get rid of big business. Make the rich pay their "fair share" of the taxes, which, if they did, may actually pay less than they currently pay, and cause the 47% of those who pay zero taxes, to pay their fair share, if you get technical about it.
Tea Party loves America and holds our Constitution in the highest regard--so high, in fact, that they resent the way our current president has practically disregarded it. They do not believe in the Obama czars who are not being held accountable by congressional oversight, and they do not believe in policies like the Dream Act where illegal immigrants get a better fiscal deal than legal immigrants and even American-born citizens.
Occupy Wall Street has Democratic approval because the dems know these protestors are too dense to realize that the current administration has made the country's debt and fiscal crisis much worse and hope to gain more sympathy from socialist/Marxist voters. Obama refuses to condemn them and has said that the demonstrators express "the furstrations that the American people feel." He pretends they are feeling frustration due to something other than his failed policies, regulations, and insane spending. He is hoping to also fool the other Americans who actually take showers.
Tea Party had the media treat them as "crazies," "fringe," "racists," and "mobs." But now Nancy Pelosi is comparing the Occupy Wall Street mob to the Tea Party, but not in a negative way. She is trying to elevate the unwashed (literally) mob as a movement with a real message. At this time, it isn't very clear what their message is.
Occupy Wall Street has are the darlings of the media, in part, because of organizations like MoveOn.org and labor unions. George Soros is behind some of the positive publicity too.


How many of these protestors have jobs? How many sincerely want jobs? How many get government subsidies? It's significant that they can protest for so many days and not have a job to go to--the Tea Party people mostly have jobs. They didn't protest for weeks at a time because they had to go to work. They don't have the luxury of these protestors whose mommies and daddies pay their way.

These idiots believe there should be salary caps on professions. For example, doctors should only make $28 thousand per year; this is idiotic. They believe that people who have worked hard for their wealth should share it with them. They do not believe in the free market but they believe things should be free for them, like education, health care, and maybe even food.             

Obama will try to use Occupy Wall Street to his advantage. As Saul Alinsky said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste." He and the Democratic party are aligning with this movement because it camoflages the reasons they are angry in the first place. This do nothing president is, if anything, crafty and sneaky. He is the most devisive president this country has ever known and he will continue to divide us because he cannot run on his record--he never did in the first place because he had no record to run on.

Something smells on Wall Street and in Washington DC.
Tweet

Woodstock on the Stock Exchange

Your Taxes at Work

What's the meaning behind the protest in the Occupy Wall Street protest? Some say it's Tea Party envy and I don't disagree, but I think it's even more than that. I believe it's a way a group of people try to capture some sort of meaning in their sorry lives. Their message is incoherent, for the most part, and it's a "You, my government, owe me a job."  "I hate you, you damn rich banks."  "I hate the rich on Wall Street who have all the money, and I have nothing but loans from them, and it's unfair." 

I believe that, at a deeper level, these protestors are a bunch of unwashed hippy wannabees who are trying to recapture a primal Woodstock moment that their parents experienced. These libiots want to make history, and they even say that in their mindless chanting. They say that "this is what democracy looks like," but if they actually get what they're asking for, democracy will go down the tubes and George Soros will do the flushing of the toilet.

 Not An Irish Spring

Many of these people are socialists, and they have the right to be lazy and stupid socialists. But some of these protestors are undoubtedly communists, hate America, and love idiots like Michael Moore, a guy who made all his money as a capitalist denouncing capitalism. And the protestors don't even get it. Some of them don't get it so much, they don't even know that they actually are communists and socialists. They just want the wealthy to share their money with them. But even before that message went out, the mob assembled without a definition of what the heck they were protesting about in the first place. Usually protests work the opposite way around in America--people are upset about the way things are running, and the last straw is the protest--here is was the protest, then the discussion of why they were protesting. Sounds very insinsoros to me.

The media compares these people to the tea party but the major differences that I see between the two groups is the tea party people actually shower, have jobs, and know what it is they're upset about. When the tea party protests, nobody gets arrested, there is no violence, no traces of anti-Semitism, nor anti-America, just a real concern over the way the government is getting involved in things they aren't qualified to get involved with, and generally tend to screw up when they do.


Obama and some unions are supporting these protestors. It's just another way our president can divide us and hopefully win next year. The unions, with their Hoffaesque mentality support the unwashed because they will support anyone who goes against the managers of wealth, in spite of the fact that the union leaders possess so much of it themselves. 


So next time you're in the Wall Street area and see a mob, as opposed to a group of protestors, hold your head high as you hold your nose, and keep walking on your way to work.

Tweet