Pelosi attacks US Judiciary branch of government: "They have gone rogue"

Lip locked anger

As we all know, there are three branches of government: the executive branch, currently held by a man suffering from dementia; the congressional branch, composed of the House of Representatives and the Senate; and the judiciary, which is the Supreme Court comprised of nine justices.

During Donald Trump's first presidency, and hopefully not his last, he appointed three SCOTUS Justices: Neil Gorsuch, 2017; Brett Kavanaugh, 2018; and Amy Coney Barrett, 2020.

As with most justices, their judicial philosophies and decisions often reflect conservative viewpoints, particularly in areas such as individual liberties, regulatory powers, and social issues. Both Coney Barrett and Gorsuch are considered originalists, while Kavanaugh is aligned in that direction but he is also pragmatic in his approach.

The term "originalism" is the judicial philosophy that interprets the U.S. Constitution as it was originally intended to mean or be understood when it was enacted. Thus, the words of the Constitution should be assigned the same meaning as it did when adopted and its interpretation should be grounded in the text itself and the historical context and intent of the framers. Therefore, it limits the role of the Supreme Court and calls for the need for change to come from the legislation or amendments rather than the Court changing the law via judicial interpretation.

Naturally, the judicial philosophy of the Supreme Court with its conservative majority tends to piss off the left, who, when in power, would like to make the rules of the game to their advantage.

Former Speaker of the House, Nancy "Hands-a-Blur" Pelosi (D-CA) had a covert conniption we must assume, when Trump made those appointments to SCOTUS. The ample dentured octogenarian said in an interview on the Communist Network News (CNN) with Anderson Cooper, that the Supreme Court has "gone rogue" when asked about their legitimacy.

Pelosi [aka "Dancing Dentures"] made the remarks Monday night about the judiciary branch of American government because she doesn't agree with their rulings, and anyone who disagrees with her has no right to do so.

“No, I think they have gone rogue. It’s most unfortunate,” she claimed, when asked about their legitimacy. “But it’s unfortunate further to see what the other justices … what happened to the chief justice? Did he go weak or did he go rogue? I don’t know. And that’s the same thing with these members of Congress, if I can take it back to that, because, as tragic as that night was — and they were coming after me to put a bullet in my head. They were going to hang the — have a gallows for the vice president of the United States.”

“So, no, I don’t have confidence in the Supreme Court,” the congresswoman of the failed state of California later added. “I think that some of the decisions they have — see, I respect their point of view. If they have a point of view about a woman’s right to choose, okay, but that’s not what they’re there to do, to advocate for a point of view. Run for Congress.”

She claimed that the justices voted “their opinion on policy” rather than follow “the oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.”

“I want us to get back to a place where the three branches of government, as our Founders initiated, are respected across the board,” she claimed. “But I don’t have a lot of confidence in this court, unfortunately. I say that with a heavy heart."

The fact that Trump undid Roe v. Wade and gave the power back to the states, thus taking it away from the Supreme Court, shows exactly the opposite claim made by Pelosi. This is why we are a republic as opposed to a pure democracy. But people like Pelosi [aka "The Ice Cream Lady"] want the power of the majority to rule over the minority, even when the difference in number is nearly the same.

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." This is often attributed to Benjamin Franklin, but he probably didn't say it.

Pelosi may not like the existence of protections in the U.S. Constitution and our checks and balances in government, which protects us from the tyranny of the majority, but these safeguards are what makes the country the best we have on earth. We aren't perfect, but we are far beyond what's out there.

Tweet

BREAKING: SCOTUS rules on CO ballot whether to disqualify Trump

The U.S. Supreme Court did what they rarely do: they made an unanimous decision. In this case it was whether to allow Colorado to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state ballot.

Rather than doing what so many writers do nowadays and go into detail about the history of elections or whatever the topic is, I will tell you now, that SCOTUS ruled in Trump's favor and ultimately in favor of the country. They sided unanimously with Trump and Colorado cannot kick him off the 2024 presidential primary ballot. 

That's what they do in dictatorships, and while Biden's handlers try to rule as dictators with their alleged president barely able to toilet himself successfully, the Supreme Court did the right thing and this case will definitely impact the several other states from removing the likely GOP nominee from their respective ballots in a move that is termed "lawfare."

[H/T Fox News.]

The court considered the meaning and reach of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment for the first time. It bars former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from holding public office again. Challenges have been filed to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in over 30 states even before being found guilty as charged. [It used to be 'innocent until proved guilty in a court of law, but the Left has tried to change that concept.]

"We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency," the Court wrote.

The state of Colorado had argued that because they determined Trump’s behavior related to 2020 election interference – culminating with the Jan. 6 Capitol riots – amounted to an "insurrection," he should be removed from the state’s ballot. 

But how did they "determine" it? They used their feelings . . .  nothing more than feelings.

However, even the liberal Justices agreed that to allow a state to remove someone who has not been convicted of a crime from their primary ballot, would cause both political parties to perpetuate the harmful, un-American practice. 

Sorry Joe--you'll have to do this one fair and square.

Tweet

Biden compares himself to George Washington: he probably meant George Soros

"Who stole my teeth?"

Joey Biden gave a speech someone made near Valley Forge. His goal was to attack former President Donald Trump and simultaneously tell the American people how similar he is to George Washington, a guy whose statue he had no trouble allowing to be torn down by his woke allies.

Biden discussed the January 6 get together and how Trump was a threat to democracy [therefore he should be stopped from running against him, which, is in his demented mind, is not a threat to democracy]. If anything is a threat to democracy it's the Democrat Party doing all they can to weaponize the law enforcement arms of the government to attack conservatives.

The left continues to attack the right of citizens to vote for Trump by removing him from the ballot in several states. These attacks are unprecedented and undemocratic. They should scare everyone on both sides of the political aisle, because if they can do it to us, we can do it to them, and what will come out of that won't be pretty.

You want to see a danger to democracy--look no further than the White House and Biden's crew.

Biden tried to compare himself to our founding father, George Washington. He may have actually meant George Soros because the only thing Biden has in common with Washington is that they're both insentient. 

Imagine the undeserved ego Biden has to have to make that comparison. Someone must have told him the was speaking in Valley Forge where Washington used as one of the eight winter encampments for the Continental Army's main body. Someone must have also reminded him who George Washington was, as the houseplant was surrounded by American flags and looked lost.

Biden spoke about the extremely cold winter that Washington had to endure and how Washington could have been crowned king but rejected it. On the other hand, Biden and his cronies want to control free speech and pack the Supreme Court with Democratic sympathizing justices and take away gun rights along with other rights that he sees fit to take. 

Now doesn't that sound more like George Soros than George Washington?

Funny how Biden spoke about the brutal cold weather Washington and his men had to face at Valley Forge. Biden moved his speech from January 5 to the 6th due to the cold weather.

Tweet

Biden says "Democracy is not perfect; it's never been good"

Alleged President Joe Biden is still the gaffing machine he has always been and he made a doozy on Monday. What might be called a slip of the tongue might also be called Joe's truth when he made remarks at Arlington National Cemetery to commemorate Memorial Day.

Biden is an embarrassment to the country and to the office of President.

While he did say some good things about democracy in his speech, both before and after his brain fart, he still revealed himself to be a not very bright politician and a worse American, in my opinion.

Biden mumble-argued that there is a “perennial struggle for democracy and freedom.”

“Ladies and gentlemen, today we remember and we reaffirm: Freedom is worth the sacrifice. Democracy is not perfect; it’s never been good — perfect. But it’s worth fighting for; if necessary, worth dying for,” the Big Guy said.

JOE BIDEN on Memorial Day: “Democracy has never been good.” pic.twitter.com/Sz9qA4pVZz

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson)

“It’s more than just our form of government, it is part of the very soul of America. The soul of America,” he mush-mouthed, apparently having forgot that last year he insisted the soul of America is racist.

In his inaugural address Biden said that the government and society as a whole is systemically racist. If you believe that nonsense, you would naturally have concerns about democracy. 

But it's a lie. We fought a Civil War to end slavery in America, and the same leftists who call us racist refuse to call out the current day slavery that continues in the Middle East, China, and the African continent.

We are living in a time where white people are pathologized "and a new mania is invented every month," as Douglas Murray points out in his latest book, "The War on the West."

The United States is not a racist country, although racists exist everywhere in the world and melanin levels do not predict its existence. We passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 treating all races equally under the law, but still the haters point the blame on white people--which in itself, is a racist claim.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Biden's words past and present are often contradictory and generally bumper sticker rhetoric. Nobody with full cognitive capacity takes him serious but they have to pretend they do.

For Biden, democracy is a necessary evil but he would like to see that as a temporary evil as would the entire far left.

Tweet

Holy Bat chip Crazy, Batman! Blinken refutes Dems' SCOTUS packing plan: it's how 'democracies come undone'

Secretary of State Antony Blinken was in Quito, Ecuador this week where he delivered a speech on "Making Democracy Deliver for the Americas." The speech turned out to be critical of the subject of packing the Supreme Court with like-minded additional justices who would support the ideology of the Democrat in power. This, of course, undermines the goals of President Biden and his party proponents at the same time it undermines democracy.

Blinken met with Ecuadorian President Guillermo Lasso [who may have been at the end of his rope] prior to his speech. “Consider a country," he said, "where a leader is elected in a free and fair election and then sets about chipping away slowly but surely, at the pillars of democracy – attacking the free press, undermining the independence of the courts, threatening political opponents. Now, imagine that leader then seeks to use the levers of democracy to pass anti-democratic reforms, eliminating term limits, packing courts, firing legislators.

“That’s the story of more than one democracy in our hemisphere. And it’s one of the ways that democracies can come undone,” Blinken added before heading off to Bogotá, Colombia. 

The speech comes after the death on September 18, 2020 of the notorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the far-left Associate Supreme Court Justice who was revered by the left until she opposed kneeling for the National Anthem and thought Colin Kaepernick was an anal sphincter dipped in hot sauce. The Democrats worried that she would be replaced with a non-socialist justice and low and behold, Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed in October last year.

So the Left kept on threatening to pack the court now that they had a shrub going along with their decisions.

“Nothing’s off the table. Everything is on the table,” said then-Senate Minority Leader Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Biden was too cowardly to discuss the idea of packing the Supreme Court during the last part of his basement campaign, but that's only because Americans with more than two brain cells to rub together knew it was undemocratic and wrong to do.

The Founding Fathers of our country knew about the "tyranny of the majority." That's why they implemented check and balances in the government. Let's face it, if the population of a jungle consisted of 2 lions and one sheep, how do you think they'd vote on "what's for dinner?"

A commission, composed of 36 people was appointed by Biden and was to report back to him within 180 days to discuss and decide the fate of the SCOTUS. Last week they ultimately decided that packing the court is a bad idea.

“As a legal matter, we conclude that Congress has broad power to structure the Supreme Court by expanding (or contracting) the number of Justices,” a 28-page draft report from the committee stated. “The prudential question is more difficult, and Commissioners are divided on whether Court expansion would be wise.”

The committee on page 27 of the draft argued that former leftist President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1937 scheme to pack the court with activist jurists who would help his New Deal legislation worked to intimidate the court. FDR wanted to be a dictator, which is why he ran for 4 terms and died in the last one. Had he lived, he would have probably been considered a dictator in our history of the nation.

In 1983, Biden, who was more lucid and just as corrupt, slammed FDR over the un-American court-packing scheme, calling it a "boneheaded idea," and a "terrible mistake."

Blinken seems to agree with more lucid Biden, but he may regret to have disagreed with the shrub.

Tweet

MSNBC host thinks rural Americans are a 'core threat' to democracy

MSNBC is not run by the Russian Federation but many think it is. Their host, Joy Reid (whose first name is an oxymoron) believes that rural Americans are "the core threat to our democracy."

By democracy she means the right of the people to shut up the rights of those on the right. By rural she means anyone not living on the coasts or in a major Democratic city. By threat she means the demands by people to fully support the U.S. Constitution.

Reid pointed to a series of tweets by liberal writer Jared Yates Sexton claiming Trump supporters "do not believe in the Constitution or any founding principles unless they're advantageous" as proof of her far left theory.

Conservatives who voted for Trump and others who didn't vote for the top of the ticket, as well as Libertarians who voted for Trump, view the U.S. Constitution as one of the most important documents in existence, right up there with the Bible. 

It's ludicrous to think otherwise.

"By 2040, about 70% of Americans are expected to live in the 15 largest states. They will have only 30 senators representing them, while the remaining 30% of Americans will have 70 senators representing them," MSNBC producer Kyle Griffin tweeted.

Griffin is assuming that when people who live in rural America move to our 15 largest cities, they will all vote Democratic even if they voted Republican before the move. It seems to be his belief that cities make one a liberal--perhaps it's the crime, garbage and bad air.

That's the narrow thinking only a liberal could come up with.

Reid's Twitter finger is probably calloused from all the work it gets. She incessantly tweets against President Trump to the point of not seeing anything positive he does, which is unrealistic. Although Sexton didn't mention "rural minority" in his tweet, Reid took it upon herself to quote him and add her own commentary tied to it. 

She tweeted:

"This is the core threat to our democracy. The rural minority--the people @JYSexton just wrote a long thread about--have and will continue to have disproportionate power over the urban majority."

Reid, who is apparently unaware that we live in a democratic republic, not a simple democracy, said that she would like to see the "abolition of the Electoral College" as a way to fix the issue and get rid of the idea of an equitable representation of all states.

But asking a host from MSNBC to be equitable is like asking ISIS to be nice on Christmas Day.

Joy Reid is a mean spirited, disgusting person. She refers to Trump supporters as "deplorables" because she hasn't had an original thought in her life, which is why she's perfect for MSNBC.

Reid is still livid over Hillary Clinton's loss to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election and if Donald Trump cured cancer, she talk about how he put oncologists out of work. She said that living in Trump's America [I never knew it was his] is the "worst time to be a human." 

She's lucky on that count.

Thoughtful people cannot take MSNBC seriously, and hopefully, will even see  Fox News through a critical eye.



Tweet

The anarchists' beat goes on

Removing the coward's graffiti 

The anarchists are running the asylum.

Now that Donald Trump trumped Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the small-minded leftists cannot bear it. And while the liberal media warned the country that if Clinton won the election, Trump supporters would become violent, it looks like they're guilty of what they've accused his supporters.

The anger is so palpable that there is a flood of calls on Twitter and other social media to assassinate Trump. This coming from the party of abject intolerance of anything that doesn't give them what they want.

Fortunately, the online threats are going to be investigated by authorities. The first place they should look is the server of George Soros, but they probably won't.

It isn't that Soros would actually make the threats himself, but I have no doubt that he would pay for someone to do it for him. As it stands at this moment some people believe that Soros has other plans and that they involve the Clintons in what is being called the Purple Revolution.

Trump met with President Obama on Thursday and called the meeting a "great honor." Obama said they had an "excellent" and "wide-ranging" conversation, and he urged people to "now come together."

The urging wasn't strong enough to stop the rioting nor the calls for Trump's assassination. Twitter went viral with the hashtag #AssassinateTrump. 

His plans when Hillary would be
away are crushed

Secret Service spokeswoman, Nicole Mainor, declined to comment on the posts directly, obviously keeping it a secret as to what they plan to do, as per agency policy. "The Secret Service does not provide information regarding protective services," she said.

However, one source told The Post that they will investigate all social service media postings containing credible threats, explaining that there's a difference between saying you have a plan to actually commit the act, and to call for someone else to do it. The source explained that normally, indirect threats are not prosecuted.

Of course, everyone knows that if the Trump supporters called for the assassination of Hillary Clinton had she won, the media would go crazy calling the miscreants "perverts of democracy" or some such thing. 

And it is indeed a perversion of democracy when a fair and democratic election chose Trump to be President and some on the left are trying to stop it with violence.

Definitely not a Benghazi victime's wife
or mother

The best form of protest, obviously, is at the ballot box, but when you're dealing with people, many of whom probably didn't even vote in the election, but refuse to accept the best form of government on earth, you know the anarchists are running the asylum.

I hope this all turns out to be talk and no action. Donald Trump has been elected President and the left needs to accept it and try to make peaceful changes . . . after many of them stop weeping.



Tweet

Erdogan thinks he has Allah on his side

Recep Tayyip Erdogan remains President of Turkey because he got a "gift from Allah," he said. Now, with the help of the "big guy," Erdogan will be able to 'do a Walmart' and roll back the secularism and force people to be good Muslims as the country moves ahead to the Seventh Century.

Erdogan can now be the man he always was without having to hide it, and Allah can get more Muslims to pray toward Mecca and tell Him what a great god he is. It all works out in the end . . . if you're the type of person who wants your country to be run by a religious set of laws instead of secular ones. (

Hint: if you like democracy, allowing women to show their faces in the street and even be on the street without a male chaperone, the idea that people can believe in whatever they want, and that all people are created equal, then you're probably a secular kind of person.)

The end results of the failed coup worked out so very well for Erdogan that some are saying the event was "staged" for his benefit. He would call it "political taqiyya,' a deception perpetrated on the world for his benefit and the ultimate benefit of spreading Islam.

One has to question the idea that if Allah is so powerful and awesome, why does he need the help of human hands to do his bidding both in killing and spreading Islam? Also, why does any god feel so insecure that he wants his followers to tell him how great he is five times a day?

Under the Obama presidency, now in its final year,  change that he promised has come. But it is not the change anyone wanted, and the hope that was to accompany the change is dwindling fast. 

We now have hope for change.

The situation in Turkey will likely deteriorate our relationship with them if Erdogan has his way and creates yet another theocracy in the world.

Remember the words of Steven Weinberg: 

"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."

Peace .  .  .  but in order to have it we need to do something that we're obviously not doing.



Tweet

The Citadel: the 'Religion of Special Needs' loses

The Citadel is Dixie's West Point and has been so since 1842. Located in Charleston, South Carolina, it is one of six Senior Military Schools in the country. It has 17 academic departments, 19 major subjects and 36 minors. Students are required to live on campus for their 4-year bachelor's degree.

The Citadel is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The school combines physical challenges, academics and military discipline.

The South Carolina Corps of Cadets is one of the largest uniformed student bodies in the United States and all members are required to participate in ROTC.

The mission statement of The Citadel reads:

To educate and develop our students to become principled leaders in all walks of life by instilling the core values of The Citadel in a disciplined and intellectually challenging environment. A unique feature of this environment for the South Carolina Corps of Cadets is the sense of camaraderie produced through teamwork and service to others while following a military lifestyle.

Note the operant words "uniformed," "military" and "camaraderie." 

An American Muslim student admitted to the class of 2020 Corps of Cadets requested permission to wear a hijab, or Islamic headscarf. Religious headscarfs are against the uniform regulations of The Citadel and therefore the young woman was denied permission. 

Citadel President Lt. General John Rosa released a statement explaining that the decision to reject the request came from an "essential" need to standardize the appearance of the cadets regardless of their religious requirements.

Thus, Jews cannot wear yarmulkas, Sikhs cannot allow their hair to grow beyond a specified length nor wear their traditional turban, and Amish cannot wear their straw hats and black coats. 

And so on.

But Islam always presents itself as "the religion of special needs," and wants the rest of the world to accommodate them, rather than the reverse. An example of this occurred at Catholic University in Washington D.C. where Muslims requested that offensive crosses be removed from the school because it distracts them from prayer.

The use of uniforms, particularly at a military academy, is to bring a sense of camaraderie and instill a singleness in purpose. 

"This process reflects an initial relinquishing of self during which cadets learn the value of teamwork to function as a single unit. Upon graduation, The Citadel's graduates are prepared to enter a life committed to principled leadership in military service and civilian careers," Rosa said in the statement. 

Rosa made it clear that in spite of the rejected request, religious beliefs are respected at The Citadel and freshman cadets meet with many faith-based organizations. The school also offers places of worship as well as the accommodation of dietary and prayer requirements.

What they don't offer is Sharia compliance, but the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is doing its best to break that barrier and force all American institutions, private and governmental, to become Sharia compliant or face consequences in the future.

CAIR is an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial that linked the Muslim Brotherhood to terrorist organizations such as Hamas.

A spokesman for the family of the Muslim future student says the prospective cadet is disappointed over the rejection of being Sharia compliant.

Ibrahim Hooper spoke with the woman to tell her the hijab is off, but Hooper said the woman will not attend The Citadel this fall unless they give in to Sharia law. 

And CAIR, as is their 'go-to' move, will be suing the school.

Why we allow organizations with terrorist ties in our country is beyond belief. All they want, as the Muslim Brotherhood goals show, is to "destroy [their] miserable house from within." 

Just look at Europe and Sharia--this is their goal and "Democracy can go to hell."


Tweet

Palestinians make hypocrisy look easy

Jerusalem, Israel -- The Palestinian Authority (PA) has requested the United Nations begin an investigation into alleged not legally authorized killings by Israel. The term "extrajudicial" is the operant word here, because Israel does not follow Sharia. 

Under Sharia law, or Islamic law, Palestinians are allowed to kill Israelis (read: Jews). 

How do I know? The Koran tells them so. 

Here's the story: Last week, an Israeli soldier killed a Palestinian terrorist (who, prior to the incident, had attacked Israelis) as he lay wounded on the ground). There is video evidence of the incident. The Israeli soldier appears to have killed the terrorist in cold blood and therefore needs to be put on trial for what clearly appears to be a crime.

He is also the exception to the way Israel behaves toward the Palestinians--they are remarkable in their efforts to avoid killing innocent non-combatants. However, Palestinians see no Israelis as innocent, including children. This is why they fire rockets at school buses and into Jewish neighborhoods, hoping to kill a Jew.

Saeb Erekat, a Palestinian official, claims that past Israeli investigations have failed to "serve justice" and says that Israel has been "rewarded with impunity." Most anti-Semitic neo Nazis agree, but do facts support the claim?

AL. Democrat Gov.George Wallace

Can an "Islamic-heavy" United Nations even be thought of as impartial body in adjudicating alleged Israeli war crimes? How different is that from a Jim Crow court in a George Wallace, Bull Connor, Alabama?

Remember, the PA is in bed with Hamas (don't vomit) and that terrorist organization offers absolutely no human rights to its people. In fact, they often use women and children as human shields because they know the Israelis won't shoot at them. There's video of that too.

So we can observe how a theocratic tyranny [Hamas] maligns a liberal Israeli democracy. Palestinians have more human rights in Israel than they do in so-called Palestine. And worse, we see how the UN community can rig the system for the Arabs do destroy Israel and they can feel guiltless and pat each other on the back.

Islamic law (Sharia) frees Hamas and other terrorist groups from the obligation of abiding by international standards which they demonize as "Christian," or "Western" and thus are considered by them to be "Satanic." 

A United Nations official report in 2009 stated that a systematic and deliberate targeting of civilians violates International Humanitarian Law which is considered to be a war crime. This is just one of several such reports.

So clearly, Hamas, which is sanctioned by the PA, is guilty of war crimes many times over, and this Israeli soldier is equally as guilty. But the shooting came about after a six-month wave of Palestinian initiated attacks that have killed 28 Israelis and 2 Americans. In the same period of time, 188 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli self-defense measures, either by jihadists attacking civilians or by Israeli forces.

The Palestinians claim that attacking Israeli civilians is justified, but not when Israel does the same because Israel doesn't have Sharia law on its side.

Sharia allows Muslims to "Kill them wherever you find them, and lay in ambush . . . "

Read all about it in the Koran, their so-called "Holy" book.



Tweet

Gates on Obama being on the wrong side

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates revealed something that most of us who don't worship Obama already know: our president supports the Muslim Brotherhood.

Gates spoke on Fox News (see video) and said, "Literally, the entire national security team recommended unanimously handling Mubarek differently than we did. And the president took the advice of three junior backbenchers in terms of how to treat Mubarek."

Actually, Obama didn't really "take the advice" [from three junior staff], he just used it to do what he would have done in the absence of the advice. The three backbenchers, as Gates referred to them, told Obama that he "needed to be on the right side of history." Obama used that phrase as his own, acting as if he could know the future, but when we look back at his decisions, it's obvious that he either has no idea of what he's doing, or if he does, he's on the wrong side of freedom and democracy.

The Egyptians themselves complained Barack was supporting terrorism, and of course, he was--the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization and it doesn't take a "Constitutional scholar" to know that. But it takes a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer to deny it.

So Barack Hussein Obama went against the advice of everyone on his national security team and allowed the Egyptian coup to overthrow Mubarak. Gates believes the decision of the three stooges was based on idealism, not facts. It doesn't get any more liberal than that.

Obama 3.0 with Morsi

In Gates' interview, Brett Baier noted that once it was obvious Mubarak could not stay in power and the Egyptian military under al Sisi urged caution, Obama "pushed for his [Mubarak's] immediate removal." 

As bad as some say Mubarak was, he certainly was an ally and not as authoritarian as other Islamic theocracies. It was him who allowed our warships access to the Suez Canal and unrestricted rights to our military aircraft that helped maintain peace for Israel.

But like Israel, Obama has no allegiance to our allies. He only appears to align himself on the wrong side of history when Mohamed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood dictator, became president.

Morsi was overthrown by the people of Egypt in spite of Obama's love for the Muslim Brotherhood. They now drink tea at the White House.


Tweet

Israeli Ambassador: U.N. Ignores the Slaughtering of Christians

Yoni Hersch, in  Israel Hayom, writes about the Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor. 

Prosor spoke before the Islamic-leaning waste of an institution saying that "Israel is the only place in the Middle East where minorities are free to practice their faith." They also have the right to not practice any faith. 

Of course, we know that Israel is also the only place where Arabs actually have individual rights irrespective of religion or gender.

But what has concerned Mr. Prosor is that the UN ignores the murder of Christians in Arab states and they have fled both Hamas and PA rule in Gaza, West Bank. "Last year police in Saudi Arabia stormed a Christian prayer meeting and arrested its entire congregation, including women and children . . . In 2013, three Iranian Christians were caught selling Bibles, found guilty of 'crimes against state security,' and sentenced to 10 years in prison," Prosor said.

This is the way of governments when they are theocracies. 

In spite of the fact that Israel is considered a Jewish state, hated by Muslims because of the religious demand placed upon them by Islam scripture demand Muslims to hate Jews, the Israeli government affords Israeli Muslims more rights than they would have in their home countries.

"It's time for the UN Security Council to break its silence on the murder and expulsion of Christians and other minorities in Arab states," Prosor added.

Fat chance of that happening.

The only way there will ever be a change in aggression against non-Muslims in the Middle East and the rest of the Islamic world, is when Islam changes and becomes tolerant of other religions and of those of no faith. In order to do that, Islamic scripture needs an overhaul, and Muslims see the Koran as the perfect word of Allah.

Perfect doesn't need to be fixed. 

And in spite of the fact that the Koran discusses abrogation, (where better verses that came later in Mohammad's life, override earlier verses) Muslims aren't going to change one word of it without a fight.

Islam is a religion founded on war, not peace, anger, not love. A hard "religion" that will be hard to change.

Tweet