FBI Director Wray: classified info supports pandemic originating in China lab

Well, well, well, it looks like the left are the real purveyors of misinformation as it is becoming increasingly clear that the "China virus" came from a China laboratory, not a wet market serving up bat stew, as they originally insisted upon. 

FBI Director Christopher Wray let the bat out of the bag in an interview Tuesday admitting that the FBI assesses that a Wuhan, China lab was responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic that killed over 7 million people. Wray said that there is classified information that confirms the bureau's analysis.

Wray's admission comes after the Department of Energy came to the same conclusion, as the Wall Street Journal reported.

Fox News anchor Brett Baier asked Wray about the bureau's assessment to which he replied,  “the FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan.”

No kidding, Sherlock.

“The FBI has folks, agents, professionals, analysts, virologists, microbiologists, etc., who focus specifically on the dangers of biological threats, which include things like novel viruses, like COVID, and the concerns that in the wrong hands, some bad guys, a hostile nation-state, a terrorist, a criminal,” Wray continued. “The threats that those could pose.”

“So here you’re talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled lab that killed millions of Americans. And that’s precisely what that capability was designed for,” the feckless added. “I should add that our work related to this continues, and there are not a whole lot of details I can share that aren’t classified. I will just make the observation that the Chinese government, it seems to me, has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate the work here. The work that we’re doing, the work that our U.S. government and close foreign partners are doing. And that’s unfortunate for everybody.”

The big question is, why is the Department of Energy involved with things not in their purview?

Tweet

Comical News Network snubbed from debate moderation

CNN Moderator to Trump: President Trump, how have you coped with your abject failures as President? How ashamed are you?
CNN Moderator to Joe Biden: Mr. Vice President, it's an honor, sir. My question to you is, what is the one thing you would like to see happen in your presidency that you haven't already accomplished as Vice President?

This is how a Comical News Network (CNN) moderator would sound if that network was allowed to put in a Biden shill. Thankfully, that will not happen because the network is being snubbed for the debate(s) and this is for obvious reasons.

The whiners at CNN are now whining publicly that Chris Wallace [who is not shill for Trump, that's for certain] a Fox News host, is moderating the September 29th debate.

Speaking on CNN's "Newsroom," socialist host Brianna Keiller, seemed to be clueless as to how Chris Wallace, a person who appears left-leaning. would get the chance to moderate while working for a network that doesn't believe Trump should be thrown out of office in disgrace, incarcerated for being a wise ass, and made to give up all his wealth to Black Lives Matter and Antifa. She believes that Fox News, not the Compromised News Network [aka Comical News Network; aka Communist News Network] who "tells it like it feels."

“The presidential debates are set and Fox News’ Chris Wallace will monitor the first between President Trump and Joe Biden,” said Keillar, as reported by Newsbusters. “The debate commission giving the September 29th face-off to Fox despite propaganda, dishonesty, and the fact that some Fox hosts advise President Trump,” unlike Jake Tapper who only advises Republicans not to run against Democrats is state elections, or Donna Brazile who gave Hillary Clinton debate questions and who [unfortunately] works for Fox News.

Keillar, known for having the self-awareness of a crouton, then asked CNN senior reporter Oliver Darcy if perhaps the presence of Chris Wallace, who she admitted is a fair journalist, will somehow legitimize Fox News.

Let's be real. Fox News leans to the right but their actual reporters like Brett Baier, Bill Hemmer and several others, are quite fair. CNN, on the other hand, is extremely bias and far-right leaning. They leave out details and create hoaxes like the "good people on both sides" hoax in which they made it sound as if Trump was praising white supremacists and Antifa, when his next sentence clearly explained who he meant. CNN left it out, like they also forgot to report that President Trump has been nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Propaganda? Ha!


C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

AOC: "Voter suppression" a factor in Bernie's Michigan loss, but duh

Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-Socialist-NY) has once again proved that her Green New Deal wasn't an outlier as an indicator of her "brilliance." This is a person who treats facts as if they were coronavirus and says things that appear to have been pulled from her nether regions.

So it wasn't a surprise to hear what she claimed to Fox News' Brett Baier Thursday about Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Communist-VT) regarding the Michigan primary and his huge loss to Joe Biden in that race.

Baier noted that younger voters didn't turn out in force for Sanders [as is typical of young voters in general] in Michigan and asked her, "how can you say the progressive position is still prevailing nationwide when Joe Biden is winning so much?”

Her response was a feeble attempt at showing her intelligence. Instead, it proved my premise that if facts were food, she would starve.

OCASIO-CORTEZ: Well, I think one thing that we — that isn’t being talked about is the rampant voter suppression in this country. Right there, in Ann Arbor, where we had that rally, those kids were waiting three hours in line to vote in Michigan. And so when we talk about who’s turning out and who’s not turning out, we absolutely —

BAIER: So, just to be clear, you’re saying that you think voters didn’t get to vote that wanted to vote in Michigan?

OCASIO-CORTEZ: Absolutely. You know, obviously there’s also more that we need to do in terms of turning out youth voters. It’s — we need to make sure that we’re inspiring young people to turn out, but when you do turn out, you should not be waiting three, four, seven hours in order to vote. And that causes people to leave.

Joe Biden beat out Sanders by about 250,000 votes in Michigan (838,564 to 576,916 respectively), but more importantly, according to the Detroit Free Press, “the nearly 1.6 million Democratic ballots cast on Tuesday set a record.”

Voter suppression by an AOC definition is when her candidate loses.

And by definition, waiting to vote and then leaving because you're not willing to wait any longer is by no means "voter suppression," it is called impatience.

Like the farting cows of her Green New Deal, this claim is not going to fly.

When facts are involved, AOC avoids it like the plague, or you know what.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.





Tweet

Trump doesn't like Fox News today

President Trump's approval rating does best when he tweets less or attacks every little insult or opposition moment.

On Sunday, he was more critical toward Fox News, his favorite cable news network.  He blasted them for "moving more and more to the losing (wrong) side" and forgetting "the people who got them there" by hosting a town hall for Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg [aka Butter Judge; aka Alfred E. Neuman.]

Actually, President Trump didn't get Fox News "there," meaning to the top of the cable news charts--they were already there before he went on the campaign trail simply because they're center right position commands a larger, more normal, much more patriotic audience.

The town hall event was hosted by Fox News' Chris Wallace and held in Claremont, New Hampshire. As was the case with Fox's Bernie Sanders town hall, most of the audience responded frenetically to the gay South Bend mayor, and gave him a standing ovation, as noted by Mediaite. 

So in this case, as he was with the Bernie Sanders "Commie-a-thon Town Hall," the president was angry about Fox offering the far-left Democrat a positive platform on the network. Trump was particularly critical of Wallace and it's rumored that he put a magic curse on him.

Never one to let a miff go by without a tweet, Trump posted:

"Hard to believe that @FoxNews is wasting airtime on Mayor Pete, as Chris Wallace likes to call him." 

"Fox is moving more and more to the losing (wrong) side in covering the Dems. They got dumped from the Democrats boring debates, and they just want in. They forgot the people who got them there. Chris Wallace said, 'I actually think, whether you like his opinions or not, that Mayor Pete has a lot of substance...fascinating biography.' Gee, he never speaks well of me — I like [his father] Mike Wallace better...and Alfred E. Newman [sic] will never be President!"

Trump's jab at Wallace for praising Buttigieg is a reference to the host's comments last month comparing the mayor favorably to his fellow Democratic presidential candidate Robert [Beto] O'Rourke; Buttigieg, said Wallace, offers "a lot of substance" and "interesting, refreshing ideas," particularly compared to the Texas Democrat.

Trump could have pointed out that Buttigieg has swung so far to the left that he swallowed a mouthful of the Pacific Ocean, rather than attacking Wallace [who is left of center, for sure.]

In response to Trump's criticism of the network, Fox's Senior Political Analyst Brit Hume offered a little praise for Buttigieg and faulted Trump for not taking enough questions from the press. "Say this for Buttigieg--he’s willing to be questioned by Chris Wallace, something you’ve barely done since you’ve been president," said Hume. "Oh, and covering candidates of both parties is part of the job of a news channel," Hume added.

I understand that Trump is a fighter and tough counter-puncher, but I believe he needs to know when not to punch, especially the one cable news network that covers him fairly. Rather than attacking the network and the interviewers, Trump might try attacking the leftist positions the Democratic candidates have taken and talk about his economy.

The president's comments about Democrats "dump[ing]" Fox News from the party's debates refers to the Democratic National Committee announcing in early March that it is barring the network from hosting any of the Democratic presidential debates due to alleged ties between the network and the Trump administration. 

In response, Fox News Senior Vice President Bill Sammon issued a statement urging the DNC to reconsider. "We hope the DNC will reconsider its decision to bar Chris Wallace, Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, all of whom embody the ultimate journalistic integrity and professionalism, from moderating a Democratic presidential debate," Sammon said. "They’re the best debate team in the business and they offer candidates an important opportunity to make their case to the largest TV news audience in America, which includes many persuadable voters."

Whether you like Chris Wallace or not, Sammon is absolutely correct about that team. Even Wallace would ask tough questions, unlike the powderpuff questions the left asks of them.

Following Fox News' Sanders event, Trump also issued some critical comments directed at the network and the host of the event, Bret Baier. "So weird to watch Crazy Bernie on Fox News. Not surprisingly, Bret Baier and the 'audience' was so smiley and nice," said Trump via Twitter. "Very strange, and now we have Donna Brazile?"

Brett Baier is one of the best news anchors in the business, bar none. Trump needs to allow the other side to have a voice and to be courteously interviewed by him and others, unlike the way the left [such as Jim "Gosh, I Love Me" Acosta] asks questions of Republicans.

Trump cited "many complaints" that the town hall was "stuffed with Bernie supporters" while Trump supporters were supposedly not "let in." 

Trump tweeted:

"Many Trump Fans & Signs were outside of the @FoxNews Studio last night in the now thriving (Thank you President Trump) Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, for the interview with Crazy Bernie Sanders. 

"Big complaints about not being let in-stuffed with Bernie supporters. What’s with @FoxNews?" 

But the Daily Wire pointed out, The Morning Call's coverage of the event noted that Fox News "reached out to various political and local groups in the area and mined requests to attend after it publicly announced the event," and that the event was attended by Trump supporters, independents as well as Bernie supporters.

Hopefully, President Trump will stop "punching down" and go after the socialist policies the Democrats are calling for as well as the abortion issue and open borders, the two biggies that Americans are very concerned about. If he sticks to the issues rather than trying to soothe his ego [which all presidents have], I believe he'd win the 2020 election by a landslide.

So President Trump doesn't like Fox News today. Give him another day--he'll get over it.


Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

Bernie: Do as I say, not as I do

Socialist Independent Atheist Bernie Sanders (Vahmont) appeared at a Fox News town hall Monday where he appeared in front of a noisy "Bernie Bro" crowd of screaming fans.

He became quite ticked off when asked about accepting tax breaks that he voted against and also came close to blowing a gasket when Martha MacCallum asked him why he didn't send back part of the tax refund he received that he claims the wealthy needs to give back to the government.

Bret Baier first pressed Sanders on the issue, to which Sanders responded to beginning with a farting sound: "Pfft…come on…I am, I paid the taxes that I owe...why don’t you get Donald Trump up here and ask him how much he pays in taxes."

Yes, the taxes that he owes that he says isn't enough for the "millionaires and billionaires" to pay. Sanders is a millionaire.

Then Fox News host Martha MacCallum pressed the useless Senator again on the issue, asking: "So would you be willing to pay 52% on the money that you made? You can volunteer, you can send it back."

"You can volunteer too," Sanders responded, as if that was a good response. "Martha, why don’t you give? You make more money than I do," which is basically a non sequitur in regard to the question asked.

Having nothing to do with the tax percentage which Sanders proposes she said, "I didn’t suggest a wealth tax."

"And she’s not running for president," Baier added.

On several occasions, Sanders attacked Fox News and patted himself on the back for having the courage to appear on the right of center network.

And yes, he does deserve some credit, but let's face it, the appearance probably helped him, and even the mainstream media bragged about how he had the "Fox audience" on his side, which is nonsense--they were undoubtedly pro-Sanders all the way.



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

FBI's Chris Wray responds with a 'flip-off' to left's complaints about Kavanaugh investigation

FBI Director Christopher Wray stood up to the Democrat's claims that the his agency's investigation of  Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was not sufficiently thorough and perhaps even partisan.

Of course the left always makes claims attacking anyone who disagrees with their agenda. It wasn't long ago Democrats praised the FBI when they went forward in the Russian collusion investigation having to do with the 2016 presidential election.

Wray appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee at a hearing. The hearing was to discuss terrorism threats [Antifa not included] and he was asked by Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) about the Kavanaugh investigation. Harris, you may recall, is an obnoxious leftist who immediately and rudely interrupted the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) when the hearing first began. She has presidential aspirations in 2020 and for that, was a leader of the destroy Kavanaugh bloc on the committee.

Harris was San Francisco District Attorney from 2003 to 2010. She became Attorney General in 2010.

According to San Francisco Weekly reporter Matt Smith, Harris "rebuffed reporters' efforts for five years to view her office's files on Catholic clergy sex abuse under the state Public Records Act, despite statements by former San Francisco DA Terence Hallinan saying they should be released."

The files they referenced involve the San Francisco Archdiocese files on clergy sexual abuse and contain details of how the church handled the allegations internally. The charges involved: pederast, homosexuality, and pedophilia by priests going back as far as 80 years.

Apparently, Kamala Harris covered up the allegations by not releasing the truth. And she was "point" on the Kavanaugh sexual misconduct attack that was alleged to have taken place when he was 17-years-old, which was 36 years ago.

So Harris asked Director Wray if the FBI had latitude "to investigate whatever your agency thought was appropriate to figure out what happened," The Hill reported.

"Our investigation here, our supplemental update to the previous background investigation, was limited in scope and that is consistent with the standard process for such investigations going back quite a long ways," Wray responded.

"As was standard, the investigation was very specific in scope and limited in scope and that is the usual process and that my folks have assured me that the usual process was followed."

Wray explained that the investigation was termed a "supplemental background investigation." He said such investigations are very different from criminal investigations.

"Our only authority is as requested by the adjudicating (entity), in this case the White House," Wray said.

He added, "I've spoken with our background investigation specialists and they have assured me this was handled in a way consistent with their experience and the standard process."

Democrats hoped the investigation would last into the midterm elections in November and if they won the House, they would move to impeach Kavanaugh and Trump and Pence and maybe Collins, who cast the deciding vote to confirm Kavanaugh. The Democrats claimed the investigation should have unlimited time to investigate all sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh starting from his high school and college years, and including "Belchy Voice" Christine Blasey Ford, who made accusations, produced witnesses, and not one of them, including a lifelong close friend, corroborated her story.

Last week, Harris attacked the FBI probe, claiming it was "not a search for the truth, this was not an investigation, this was an abdication of responsibility and duty."

Harris is full of bull crap.

Ford and Kavanaugh were not interviewed by the FBI because they were already interviewed by the Committee and if their story changed, they would have committed perjury. And the FBI is not going to waste their time going over the same story.

It's time for two things to happen: one, the Democrats need to let this go and figure out a real platform for their party; and two, Kamala Harris needs to buy a mirror and look in it.


Please click the "Subscribe" button at the top and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Nikki Haley: No love? No money!

Nikki Haley issued a global warning to those countries that hate us: the Trump administration will no longer fund you if you hate us.

Think about it--why would anyone reward anyone else who hates them? Why give countries like Iran, who wants "Death to America" and to our ally, Israel, money to fund their ambitions?

A bigger question is: why is Trump the first president of the United States to think this way when it seems to be a fairly logical conclusion?

This is a promise Trump made on the Trump stump when he vowed to cut funding to countries that hate us.

U.N. Ambassador Haley appeared on the Brett Baier Fox News' "Special Report" on Wednesday. She spoke of the Trump foreign policy perspective in that blunt Haley way she is known for saying, "We are no longer going to give money to people who are against the U.S., or say, 'Death to America,' or do anything that would be anti-U.S."

Freaking Bravo! It's about time.

She began by speaking of the change in world attitude engendered by the foreign policy initiatives of President Trump:

"I think he's actually done a lot on foreign policy but in different ways. If you look at what he's done with North Korea, it's really led the international community to isolate North Korea to where they decide, they realize they have a decision to make. He led on the fact that he pulled out of the Iran deal. He's forcing the entire world to admit the fact that Iran was not behaving properly. He's led in Syria to make sure that chemical weapons are not being used and he's warned against them being used again."

Haley then discussed the president's attitude toward South American countries that are anti-American:

"I think that if you look in the Western Hemisphere, which we've spent the last two weeks focused on, whether it is Venezuela or Nicaragua, the messages are being sent that we are not going to support dictators."

She used that sentiment to globalize the new policies:

"We are now going to strategically start to work with our friends, and we are no longer going to be giving handouts for those who go against us."

Can I get an Amen.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

"Kid Qaeda'' in deep trouble with CIA

Monday was the 16th anniversary of the 9-11 terror attacks al-Qaeda waged against the United States. On that anniversary, al-Qaeda had a message for us: they released an image of the World Trade Center with a picture of Bin Laden's crapweasel son, Hamza superimposed into one of the buildings.

Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo also had a message for al-Qaeda, a person message for Hamza, a scumquat who is emerging as a possible new leader of the terror group.

Since May, Hamza bin Hiden Laden has become the poster puke for AQ. It was clear that he and other terrorist leaders were of concern to Pompeo.

Pompeo was interviewed by Brett Baier of Fox News.

"Hunting the senior leaders has always been important," Baier asked the CIA director. "Is there a hunt on the way for (Ayman) al-Zawahiri and (Osama) bin Laden's son?"

"Oh yes, sir," Pompeo responded.

"Daily?" Baier asked.

"Daily, every day. My team even as we sit here is working diligently to find them and bring them to justice."

"Any positive signs?" Baier asked.

There's a reason it's toilet paper

"If I were them, I would count my days," Pompeo replied. He said that AQ's senior leadership is weaker than it was in 2001, but the war against them and other terrorist organizations is far from over.

"The enemy gets a choice about whether this is over, and today, they have not concluded that they're defeated," he said.

Pompeo was then asked about former President Barack "Lead from Behind" Obama's statement that ISIS is the "JV" team when it comes to terrorism.

Not wishing to call Obama a moron or a Muslim sympathizer, he simply said that it had "never been the case" that ISIS is simply a "second-tier threat."

"The capacity to do a complex attack in the U.S. is diminished," Pompeo said, adding that "the threat here in the U.S. of these localized actors . . . working alongside ISIS figures remains."


Tweet

Gates on Obama being on the wrong side

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates revealed something that most of us who don't worship Obama already know: our president supports the Muslim Brotherhood.

Gates spoke on Fox News (see video) and said, "Literally, the entire national security team recommended unanimously handling Mubarek differently than we did. And the president took the advice of three junior backbenchers in terms of how to treat Mubarek."

Actually, Obama didn't really "take the advice" [from three junior staff], he just used it to do what he would have done in the absence of the advice. The three backbenchers, as Gates referred to them, told Obama that he "needed to be on the right side of history." Obama used that phrase as his own, acting as if he could know the future, but when we look back at his decisions, it's obvious that he either has no idea of what he's doing, or if he does, he's on the wrong side of freedom and democracy.

The Egyptians themselves complained Barack was supporting terrorism, and of course, he was--the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization and it doesn't take a "Constitutional scholar" to know that. But it takes a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer to deny it.

So Barack Hussein Obama went against the advice of everyone on his national security team and allowed the Egyptian coup to overthrow Mubarak. Gates believes the decision of the three stooges was based on idealism, not facts. It doesn't get any more liberal than that.

Obama 3.0 with Morsi

In Gates' interview, Brett Baier noted that once it was obvious Mubarak could not stay in power and the Egyptian military under al Sisi urged caution, Obama "pushed for his [Mubarak's] immediate removal." 

As bad as some say Mubarak was, he certainly was an ally and not as authoritarian as other Islamic theocracies. It was him who allowed our warships access to the Suez Canal and unrestricted rights to our military aircraft that helped maintain peace for Israel.

But like Israel, Obama has no allegiance to our allies. He only appears to align himself on the wrong side of history when Mohamed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood dictator, became president.

Morsi was overthrown by the people of Egypt in spite of Obama's love for the Muslim Brotherhood. They now drink tea at the White House.


Tweet

The Real Benghazi

Three U.S. security contractors who were part of the September 11th attack on the Benghazi American diplomatic mission in 2012 spoke with Fox News' Brett Baier on Friday. They gave a very different account than what the Obama administration would have us believe about what really happened those 13 hours of fighting when U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other brave Americans were killed by Islamic terrorists.

The security contractors are no longer hired by the CIA and spoke for the first time. These men were the first responders to attacks on the diplomatic compound and made it clear that they were apolitical and had no axe grind for either political party.

The men--Kris ("Tanto") Paronto, Mark ("Oz") Geist, and John ("Tig") Tiegen--were asked the big question by Baier: Was help delayed?

They got word of the attack around 9:32 p.m. and within 5 minutes were in their battle gear, ready to move out and gave the "thumbs up" to their team leader (who they refer to only as "Bob."

But they were held back and delayed from responding by Bob.

Tiegen said, "It had probably been 15 minutes I think, and .  . . I just said, 'Hey, you know, we gotta--we need to get over there, we're losing initiative. And Bob just looks straight at me and said, 'Stand down, you need to wait.'"

Then they started hearing from the men in the compound under attack. "Hey, we're taking fire; we need you guys here, we need help," explained Paronto.

It took about a half hour before the team decided to screw the orders and take matters into their own hands. They made their way to the annex, called for air support, but it never came.

In retrospect, they believe if they were able to respond sooner, and if they had the air support, Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods would have likely been saved.

The men state clearly that they were told to stand down, not once, but three times.

Obama's JV team disagrees.



Tweet

Dude, Two Years Not Too Late

Former White House Spokesliar, Tommy Vietor was interviewed by Fox News' Brett Baier a few nights ago. The interview was on the Benghazi talking points and young Tommy denied that he remembered the role he played in the now famous (and some call "smoking gun") e-mail that was sent to Susan Rice to "PREP" her for the Sunday morning talk shows that she was to appear on.

"Dude, that was like two years ago," the former chewing gum aficionado told Baier.

"Dude, it's the thing that everybody's talking about," Baier shot back. Tommy looked as uncomfortable as a bomb-defuser with the DTs. 

Tommy said that he was in the Situation Room during the attack but Obama was not there. Vietor said: "It is well known that when the attack was first briefed to him, it was in the Oval Office and he was updated constantly." But when pressed for Obama's physical location in the White House, Tommy said that he didn't know Obama's whereabouts in the night because he didn't have a "tracking device" on him.

It's easy to see the arrogance in Tommy Vietor--it's recognizable in many of those who speak for Obama. Jay Carney acts as though you're stupid for not believing him, and Marie Harf is no different. Clearly, the Obama administration treats the American public as if we are stupid, but it is only the Obama robots who actually are.

Here is the tweet that Tommy Vietor sent out before appearing on Fox: 

Tommy Vietor @TVietor08

Follow

Guessing @BretBaier invited me to come on @SpecialReport to talk #Benghazi as a #TBT thing since it happened in 2012 but tune in!

5:15 PM - 1 May 2014

#TBT is for "Throwback Thursday." How utterly juvenile and arrogant.

Tweet