Hillary on Libya: "Nobody died"

People are upset with Hillary Clinton when she said the "U.S. didn't lose a single person" in Libya during her time as secretary of state. She was wrong--Chris Stevens was the only single person killed in Benghazi, Libya--the remaining men who died there were married.

So, thanks to Hillary, we've only one single man--the Ambassador, but she obviously forgot about him, like she forgot about the others.

Clinton was in Illinois when she hollered that gaffe, as she was defending her desire for regime change in Libya, speaking at a town hall hosted by MSNBC, the far left network with tingles up their legs.

Ms. Clinton, who is more than likely a felon, guilty of espionage, yelled: "Now is Libya perfect? It isn't." She was comparing her approach in Libya with the greater bloodshed in Syria's civil war, but somehow she forgot to mention Benghazi and her "what difference does it make" approach to sending help for our Americans under attack.

Clinton yelled, "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn't lose a single person . . . We didn't have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO."

The House Select Committee on Benghazi headed by Trey Gowdy (R- SC) believes they will be concluding their investigation on the Benghazi mega-screwup by this summer. Hopefully Ms. Clinton will be wearing an orange jumpsuit (or pantsuit) when this is all over, but with her royal status and tons of bucks, I doubt that justice will be served.

On Sunday evening the former First Lady of Falsehood spoke at a CNN town hall and addressed coal jobs. "I'm the only candidate which (sic) has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business."

Several top people on the Clinton campaign wet their skivvies and one had to be taken to a local hospital with the vapors after such a stupid comment that was perhaps the first truthful thing she has said all year. 

As you can see, she cares as much for coal miners and their families as she did for the four Americans in Benghazi who died due to her ongoing and blatant incompetency.

The campaign scrambled with this statement: "Coal will remain a part of the energy mix for years to come." 

Spokesman Brian Fallon (no relation to Jimmy, or is there?) said, "no candidate in this race is more devoted to supporting coal communities than Hillary Clinton," adding "any suggestions otherwise are false." 

Fallon worked for Chuck Schumer and will be Clinton's press secretary if she doesn't go to prison and wins the presidency.

Yeah, Hillary and her minions never lie. It's only those of us who accuse her of lying who lie.

The only thing Hillary Clinton cares about is Hillary Clinton and her lust for political power. She will say anything and do anything that needs to be done for that power, and if anything, or anyone stands in her way, she will destroy it by any means necessary.



Tweet

Puppies, Hillary and Truth

Many people wonder whether Hillary Clinton can kill a puppy on national TV and get away with it. Certainly she can with her faithful followers who believe the idea of electing a woman president, whether she is honest, intelligent or qualified, is more important than anything else. It's the demographics vote, like the one our first black/gay president won, that matters to people with low information who simply want to be part of "a first."

Yesterday's hearings by the House Select Benghazi Committee did little to change the minds of those who either love the fact that Hillary has lady parts, and those who see her for the incompetent, immoral, unethical, lying scumcrumpet the Clintons have shown to be over the years.

But it may have made a difference to the independent voters who haven't yet taken stock in the Scandal Queen and her minions.

Rep. Susan Brooks (R- IN) asked Clinton if she spoke to Chris Stevens, the ambassador who was killed there along with three others (Information Officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty). Clinton began to filibuster a reply but Brooks cut her off with "Yes, or no."

Hillary believes she spoke to him once but didn't recall when, and there was no record that she was telling the truth.

Clinton also claimed that Chris Stevens could have "reached out" to her but didn't. It turns out that there were over 600 email requests over the year asking for more security for the compound (aka temporary mission compound) but no addition measures in men or material were given, not even a request for sandbags for fortification.

Clinton claimed that all security for Benghazi was handled by "security professionals," and did not see that as part of her job. In fact, there didn't seem to be very much that was part of her job except for traveling, which she appears to view as a huge accomplishment as opposed to an event.

Each Representative on the panel had three ten-minute opportunities to question Clinton and there was no sense of coordination of how the questions were generated. Nobody followed up on questions such as "Why did you continue to tell the families of the dead that it was the film that caused the riots?" "When did you know for sure that the film had nothing to do with the attack and that it wasn't spontaneous?" and then "Why did you immediately tell your family, the heads of Syria and Egypt that it was an attack and still carry on the false narrative to the families?"

Nobody pressed her.

She was not asked how she could justify arresting Nakoula Basseley Nakoula for producing the YouTube video when it's his Constitutional right under the First Amendment to do so. The charges of violating his parole was bull crap. 

Of course when an Egyptian court on November 28, 2012 sentenced Nakoula, several other Coptic Christians and Terry Jones to death, that was a lot worse, but hey Hillary, don't you respect the Constitution?




Tweet

Hillary on the hot seat at Benghazi hearing: pant suit on fire

Hillary Clinton is now testifying before the House Select Committee on Benghazi and the one thing obvious is that her Democratic colleagues are doing all they can to give her cover and attack Republicans for having the gall to question her integrity and judgment.

This is nothing like the Watergate hearings where the Republicans and Democrats equally sought to uncover the truth from the Nixon administration. That may be due to the fact it was a Republican on the hot seat and that Republicans are more interested in truth than in the politics that lies often elicit.

Adam Smith (D-CA) complained how the committee has spent $4.7 million in taxpayer money for this hearing, making it sound like the GOP is stealing money from the people. But he didn't mention that Obama's 2013 Ireland trip cost taxpayers $7,921,638.66 and the same year his African trip and Honolulu vacation cost us a mere $15,885,585.30 according to Judicial Watch's FOIA findings. And that's only a part of the expenses. Democrats spend more money on illegal immigrants than this committee has spent in all of its existence.

In true Hillary style, she told Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) the Sidney Blumenthal emails were "unsolicited." But when Gowdy read a few of the emails out loud, showing that Clinton clearly asked for more information from Blumenthal regarding Libya, she changed her tune to "originally unsolicited." 

Sounds a lot like her original "I did not receive nor send any classified information on my server" morphing to "I did not receive nor send any emails marked classified.

Gowdy even read emails from Blumenthal being less than generous to President Obama, leaving out his honorific, and basically putting him down.

One thing is obvious: Trey Gowdy and the Republicans on the committee have a lot more to go on this time, rendering all previous hearings a waste of time. This is the only committee that discovered Clinton used a private server and actually acquired emails that may prove damaging to the Scandal Queen.

It's becoming clear that when Hillary's lips are moving, she's lying.

More to follow, so stay tuned.

Tweet

America's legitimate complaint

Webb dropped out, Biden decided not to run, Bernie absolved his opponent by refusing to attack her on her weakest point, O'Malley apologized to Black Lives Matter anarchists because he said all lives matter, and Chafee is an idiot.

It looks like the only thing Hillary Clinton has to worry about at this point in her campaign is the law and what happens at the Benghazi hearing tomorrow.

At least the FBI is impartial to politics, they say, and perhaps, just maybe, they will get to the truth about her private email server that President Obama forbid her to have.

Maybe the House Select Committee on Benghazi will actually ask her about the video and who pushed it. Maybe they'll even ask her about the correspondence sent to her from Ambassador Chris Stevens and why she ignored his request. If she lies and says she never received it, maybe the committee will ask why this happened and what disciplinary actions did she take over the failure for staff to communicate this to her.

But I doubt the FBI will find anything damning and doubt the House Select Committee will pin her down.

I doubt this, not because I believe she is innocent of all charges, incompetency and lies, but because I believe people like the Clintons are immune to prosecution like regular folk.

Sadly, we have become a country that resembles a monarchy more than a democracy will equality under the law. This is why people like Hillary Clinton can laugh when asked about the server and national security. This is why politicians can be so damned arrogant, and we, the people, do nothing about it but complain.

Tweet

Just how much damage has Hillary's server done?

Heather Samuelson, 34, is a lawyer and a long-time Hillary Clinton aide. She was Hillary's campaign staffer back in 2008 when the presumptive  "Queen of the White House" lost the campaign to a terrorist sympathizer who gave good speech, but was "all sizzle and no steak."

In any case, Samuelson was tasked with separating Hillary's 30,000 'personal emails' from her 30,000 'work-related emails.' And while all Secretary of State emails belong to the American people, the 'Pantsuit Princess' took it upon herself to keep them hidden and then decide which category she was going to put them in.  

Then Hillary Clinton had the server wiped of all emails.

The person who revealed Samuelson's role in this scandal was Cheryl Mills, Hillary's State Department chief of staff. Mills gave this information to the House Select Committee on Benghazi when questioned about the emails.

Clinton lied when she claimed to have turned over all of her work-related emails. This is one of those "stubborn facts" Ronald Reagan once spoke about. 

You see, Sidney Blumenthal, a close friend/confidant of Hillary's, and a man who was not supposed to be involved with her role as Secretary of State, produced 15 emails he exchanged with Clinton and they were clearly work-related and she failed to turn them over in December. Hillary also lied when she said that she only had "one device" for her emails--she had several.

At least 2 emails Hillary turned over that Samuelson had seen had "Top Secret" information in them at the time they were sent. So Clinton lied when she claimed to have never sent or received classified information on her private unsecured server, and this was the catalyst that got the FBI involved.

But what about Heather Samuelson? Does she have a security clearance to allow her to even see the emails in the first place? And what about David Kendall, Clinton's lawyer who was given a memory stick with classified information on it?

Is Hillary Clinton simply too stupid to be our president? Is her judgment so impaired that she would compromise the security of our nation just for her convenience? Or did she have something to hide?

We the people have a right to know.

Tweet

Schiff-less in Benghazi

Adam Schiff  is a Democratic member of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. Adam (his political friends tease him with "Hey, Schiff-head!") who served the committee by attending 1 out of the 45 meetings the committee held, is from, you guessed it--California.

With the knowledge acquired from about 2% attendance, Schiff has issued the call to disband the committee, according to the New York Times in a Friday op-ed. He says the committee has lost sight of its purpose in the investigation of the September 11, 2011 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. He believes the committee is only concerned about bringing Hillary Clinton to justice (my words, not his), and should be disbanded.

"The committee is solely concerned with damaging her candidacy, searching for something, anything, that can be insinuated against her," Schiff wrote in his op-ed piece of Schiff's thinking on the matter.

Like the typical liberal you know and love to not know nor love, Schiff is coming from a place of ignorance since he couldn't find his way a second time to the committee meetings and has no clue of what he's talking about. 

"It is interesting he made this call considering Mr. Schiff himself has only attended one of the more-than-45 interviews conducted to date by the Select Committee on Benghazi," Jamal Ware, a committee spokesman said on behalf of Republicans on the committee.

"In fact, save for voting not to create the committee and then attending a press event on the now well-disproven Democratic talking point that all has been 'asked and answered,' Mr. Schiff has largely been a Member of the committee in absentia."

But Schiff "FEEEEELS" the committee is making life hard for Hillary and that isn't nice. Why can't they just leave Hillary alone?

Schiff wrote: "Whatever their original purpose, [and he wasn't around to know what that purpose was] the Select Committee's leaders appear no longer to have any interest in Benghazi, except as the tragic events of that day may be used as a cudgel against the likely Democratic nominee for president."

How would this cretin know that? Oh, yeah, he "FEEEEELS" it.

The FACT that she lied about the video to the families of the dead in the Benghazi attack when knowing full well it was a terrorist attack, should matter to Schiff. But maybe he's worried that she has to testify next month and that might not go over well if they could just get those darn emails off her wiped server.

Schiff is not in a position to make an argument about the Select Committee on Benghazi when the Democrats in those committee meetings, except for one, were "Schiffless."


Tweet